| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Fat fuck gets denied by own brotherBut... there are (ps, I have a bio degree as well) What those drugs do is basically inhibit lipase production in the intestines, so triglycerides cannot be broken down, which inhibits lipids from being absorbed into the intestines. Now of course a side effect of these drugs are terribly uncomfortable, explosive, fatty diarrhea (since all the fats from the foods you eat exit your body in poop form, instead of being metabolized). | /r/PussyPassDenied | 14/07/21 02:52 PM |
| 4 | Supporting womenSame could be said of the woman. Why should the man have to move it when the woman is the one who needs it down? You're begging the question by assuming that "toilet seat down" is the default standard for a toilet | /r/PussyPassDenied | 12/11/19 01:02 PM |
| 6 | Supporting womenI have not forgotten that. Let's run through some more scenarios. We'll define "efficiency" as "Having the toilet seat moved the least number of times" since that saves the household the most amount of work. Scenario 1 (Men always put the toilet seat down, start with toilet seat down) Man takes a piss, moves toilet seat up, moves toilet seat back down - Cumulative toilet seat moves - 2 Woman takes a piss, no toilet seat moves - 2 Man takes shit, no toilet seat moves - 2 woman takes shit, no toil… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 12/11/19 12:41 PM |
| 10 | Supporting womenNope, most efficient way is leave it the way it is after every operation, that way minimal effort is used. Take this example, a man goes pee, puts seat down, comes back to washroom to go pee again, lifts seat up, then puts seat down again. That's 2 movements of the toilet seat that never needed to happen. You're introducing inefficiency into the system just so women have to do less work l. It's 2019 ladies, men are taking a more active role in child rearing and domestic work, time to close the t… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 12/11/19 10:13 AM |
| 4 | Lawyers Representing Neymar Rape Accuser Drop Case Due to Contradictions.Yeah, but it would be negative pr for him (I don't agree with it, but you know how the media would eat that shit up "neymar suing rape victim" | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/06/19 08:43 PM |
| 3 | What about the gender workplace hours gap?Yeah, I still don't get what was really happening there. If the 15% was based on people on salary (which it sounded like?) then you still should be accounting for hours worked, because if the men are consistently working 60 hour weeks, and the women are working 40 hour weeks, then men are going to get raises much faster (even for similar positions). Now, that data could certainly lead you to interesting points (greater burden on child care for women, etc), but that should be called out and explo… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/19 08:09 PM |
| 4 | What about the gender workplace hours gap?Who are the women answering, and how do they seemingly not understand their own numbers at all? I mean, they struggled on basic comprehension of their data and conclusions. It didn't even look like they were trying to hide something, it just looked like they didn't even know what their stats were based on. At one point she starts reading a statement about the numbers and it seems like she doesn't really get what she's saying, she just started reading because that was the only source of "truth" s… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/19 07:58 PM |
| 16 | The maddest 11-year old out thereGiven legal precedent, if the teacher gets pregnant by the 11 year old, he pays child support still, so also kind of fucking with their life, but interesting point around pregnancy. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 09/10/18 09:27 PM |
| 16 | The maddest 11-year old out thereAs long as you would be cool with a 26 year old dude banging an 11 year old girl because "she wanted it". I mean still kind of fucked up, but at least you'd be consistently fucked up | /r/PussyPassDenied | 09/10/18 09:02 PM |
| 1 | California Assembly Reopens Investigation Into Groping Claim Against #MeToo Lawmaker Cristina GarciaThe problem is what you personally believe to have happened without real evidence shouldn't matter. A lot of people think that because this isn't a court, and because of the importance of the job, we should abandon innocent until proven guilty and not give him the job (which seems prudent, right?) The problem is, that's a really bad precedent to set. Let's say you wanted a job, but someone decided they didn't like you (maybe you committed "wrongthink") and accused you of something. Should you no… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 07:11 PM |
| 2 | California Assembly Reopens Investigation Into Groping Claim Against #MeToo Lawmaker Cristina GarciaThe problem is what you personally believe to have happened without real evidence shouldn't matter. A lot of people think that because this isn't a court, and because of the importance of the job, we should abandon innocent until proven guilty and not give him the job (which seems prudent, right?) The problem is, that's a really bad precedent to set. Let's say you wanted a job, but someone decided they didn't like you (maybe you committed "wrongthink") and accused you of something. Should you no… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 07:10 PM |
| 3 | California Assembly Reopens Investigation Into Groping Claim Against #MeToo Lawmaker Cristina GarciaThere's a couple possibilities though right? 1) he did it 2) she BELIEVES he did it, but is mistaken (something happened, but 36 years has created a false memory of the who) 3) she is playing you, and is just very good at it Any of these are possible, the problem is, without evidence, how do you choose? And more importantly, do you want to live in a world where no evidence means guilt by default? | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 04:31 PM |
| 1 | Woman kills husband at Walmart in front of 3 childrenHe has a good point though. There's a good chance that will happen, but unless you wait for that, in your head you will count this case as an "injustice" no matter what actually happens. That means even if things DO change for the better in society, you'll never notice because you'll just keep jumping to conclusions. I think this lost should be removed until something comes out of it that's actually a men's rights issue. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/18 04:37 PM |
| 2 | MSM is siding with Serena Williams.....and i'm actually really happy about itI'll respond to you here, since I think you were actually being reasonable in your approach, and I agree with you that you have to understand someone's motivations before really attacking the meat of the issue. So what does SW think? She thinks that woman are held to a different standard than men are, woman are not allowed to act out in the same way as men, and are punished for doing things men wouldn't be. Now, there are two main concerns here. One is that it's almost impossible to decide that … | /r/MensRights | 10/09/18 04:24 PM |
| 1 | Counter Protest to "March for Men"Globally Mens Rights Activists (MRAs) have operated as a gateway drug for the alt-right I actually believe this, or at least a gateway to more conservative beliefs, but probably not for the reasons they think. The reason it leads to people embracing more conservative, and even far-right views is because of how these groups RESPOND to those that are even CURIOUS about men's rights. If you're immediately considered the enemy from the political side you thought you were on for expressing completely… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/18 06:00 PM |
| 5 | The Humiliation of Aziz Ansari. Allegations against the comedian are proof that women are angry, temporarily powerful—and very, very dangerous.Fuuuuuck. I have two daughters, I was very happy about that, as I figured at least I don't have to deal with my sons having false accusations against them. I'm just realizing that when my daughters grow up, in the one that will be running a gauntlet. Guess it's time to throw myself into my career! | /r/MensRights | 15/01/18 11:49 PM |
| 3 | Facebook's Hate Speech Rules Make 'White Men' a Protected GroupSee, the thing is, in a test to train moderators, the "white men" question makes perfect sense. The idea there is to make sure they are making decisions based on the rules set out of facebook, and not on personal opinion. So, by putting that in they are testing to make sure they understood that concept (rules will protect everyone equally, not based on your own definition of racism and sexism). If the question had been white children and black women, it wouldn't be a good test of following the r… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/17 02:33 PM |
| 2 | The "wage gap" in action...Honestly, I think this actually brings up a different point than maybe you were intending here, but still a big flaw I have always had in feminist theory. There seems to be this believe that the MOST important thing in life is money (and not the SPENDING of money, but the EARNING of money). The second most important is power/influence over as many people as possible. Somewhere way down the line from there is enjoyment of life, time with family, etc. Now I think this is coming back up for me now … | /r/MensRights | 11/06/17 02:44 PM |
| 1 | White female privilege: Joe Biden's niece avoids prison for $100k Grand LarcenyThe thing is though, on the "privilege" scale, something that most SJWs miss is that class is SO VERY FAR above anything else. If you are rich and connected, it doesn't matter WHAT else you are, you're more privileged than anyone else, of any sex, race, etc. So this is an example of class privilege, not really race or sex. It's actually the biggest problem I have with most of the inter-sectional feminist/SJW/whatever thoughts right now. Somehow they want to completely glaze over the fact that be… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/17 02:17 PM |
| 2 | Saw this on Jezebel Facebook handle.My biggest problem with this is the "sacrifice their careers for their families". They've kind of decided at that point that a career (and not the money from it) is the most important thing in the world. Like all men are fucking partying all day at their amazing jobs and at the end of the day say "well shit guess I have to go home and see my family now" Guess what? Guys have been sacrificing time with their families for their careers (usually to provide for their family) forever! If I didn't hav… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/17 01:19 PM |
| 3 | Guys who go to the gym are pussiesWtf? Ok, which industry requires women to wear high heels? I work in the finance sector, which is very conservative in dress code, but tons of women in my office wear flats. It's been that way for at least ten years (at least that's all I have personal experience in). I've also worked in multiple fi's, none had a "women wear heels" code | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/04/17 08:27 PM |
| 1 | Kindergarten teacher finds Legos are good for cognitive development in young children and bans boys from playing with them in order to "close the gender gap"About your maternity comment, what exactly is that discouraging? Do you expect a future ceo to take a year maternity leave for every child? Do you honestly think that's what make ceos do? I've met many, and if they are married they tend to almost never see their children or wife. It is not a position you can have a good work life balance in, it never has been. Here's the dirty secret... You can't have it all. Men certainly don't, and never have. Working long hours has always meant sacrificing yo… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 06:18 PM |
| 8 | Why women need a shorter working week than menNono, you don't understand, what they mean is, they need to be paid the same amount as men, but work fewer hours, don't you see? So, what we need is Legislation saying: Women must work only 80% of the hours of their male counterparts Women must make the same amount as their male counterparts (no exceptions!) All jobs must be AT LEAST 50% women (Call it the "equal employment for women act), so if there are 2 positions, 1 must be a woman. If there are 3, 2 must be women. If there is only 1 positio… | /r/MensRights | 07/02/17 05:16 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter