TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rhiagg0 Archive

View 1 post and 14 comments by Rhiagg0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
41

OpinionRhiagg0/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:25 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Laci takes exception to sexual objectification and beauty standards...yet she herself applies a conventional beauty standard in her videos and shows her cleavage off. Its about practicing what you preach.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 11:11 PM
2

The very concept of her argument and the premise behind her points. People don't have to follow any kind of unrealistic expectations if they don't want to. It's the same issue I had with her video about sexual objectification. Moreover this is all incredibly ironic from a woman who intentionally angled the camera lower to focus on her cleavage through the bulk of her videos.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 06:24 PM
3

It's based off her videos and the fact that her arguments sound straight from tumblr. There are videos derailing her numerous fallacies and errors.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 02:10 AM
2

I watched the video and context and tone are typical with her other intellectual void nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 12:39 AM
-3

This is false by virtue that male and female athletes are separated by virtue of gender. We have a entire demographic of trained and fit men and women and the gaps in performance are not set individually but by their demographics.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 04:16 AM
-6

It does come down to gender given that if a man and woman train equally and are the same weight and height, the man will still be significantly stronger then the woman. It's the reason I keep bringing up athletic performances, in spite of these women being as athletic and as fit as their male counter-parts they are still several orders of magnitude slower and weaker. At some point sexual dimorphism is a titanium wall women can break through.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:03 AM
-3

You sort of did though with your insistence that sex isn't that big of a determining factor. Also you said on average...what exceptions exist in which female athletes out perform male athletes. To my knowledge no major sports have hsd such a result.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 01:03 AM
-4

Yeah it's called sexual dimorphism and we've known about it for quite sometime.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:52 AM
-2

Which, if you read the article, is due to differences in lean muscle mass. That's it. As well as a onset of biological factors in the way men process fat...moreover there is a reason men can get lean muscle mass more easily then men. Women's strength per unit of muscle mass is almost identical, is the point. If that were true then female athletes would have closed the performance gap ages ago. This proposition is a pointless given its application in a practical sense doesn't exist or at least ha…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:47 AM
-6

When comparing groups, yes. When comparing individuals, no. Unless you're willing to argue that you're bigger, stronger, and faster than every woman on the planet. I guess men and women cease being men and women when only talking about them as individuals. I wasn't aware of the physiologically process that renders men and women into grey skin androgynous plastic husk that are completely malleable and interchangeable the instant you call them "John"and "Jane"as opposed to "man" and "woman". Sarca…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:22 PM
-2

What you're taking exception with is based on misunderstanding the point I was making about chain of causality (or proximity of influence). Sex hormones --> body size and composition --> metabolic rate and performance. The only point I was making was that the most DIRECT influence on metabolic rate and performance when comparing individuals (NOT groups) is body size and composition, not sex itself. There are certainly strong trends when comparing male vs. female averages, but they don't always h…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:53 PM
-1

I hear the idea get repeated a lot that womens' metabolisms are slower simply because they're women (i.e. when you match for size, body composition, and activity level, women still burn fewer calories), which is simply false. A lot of weight loss studies have found men burn more fat and lose weight faster then women. It's a noted scientific fact that men do in fact lose weight more then women at quicker more efficient rates. Similarly, the notion that womens' muscles are weaker (again, comparing…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:34 PM
-9

Again: Most of the major differences in performance and metabolism between genders can be explained by size and body composition, not gender itself. It explicitly states size is more important then gender when gender is the reason the size difference exist in the first place.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:23 PM
-9

The point wasn't misses but perhaps your reading comprehension needs some work so I'll gladly correct you. Yes, there are strong trends for different size/strength/body composition between sexes. That's not even debateable. I'm not sure where the "article claims there is little gender differences" came from. It's acknowledged twice in the first few paragraphs.<<< I guess you didn't read a few sentences past that because the article explicitly states the differences are less about gender and more…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter