Rhoubbhe Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
–	Why should women care that men don't have partners? There isn't much of a 'Left' in the United States. It was massive in the 1920's but was largely destroyed a couple of decades later by the McCarthy purges. What we have in the US are 'Liberals', who, like the simping right, just want to keep the status quo going longer, take oligarch bribes, and kick the can down the road. The biggest culprit in the loneliness epidemic is 'Social Media'. We are a tribal primate species and aren't coping well with digital isolation, which has made people feel ins…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/06/26 02:13 PM
–	What do you think about young men feeling abandoned and demonised by left? Truth. Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds. We have two parties of corporate oppression.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/06/26 11:06 PM
16	Conspiracy : We will see never seen levels off self improving in the next Years for Men, and it will get really bad. This is very likely. A small segment may become obsessed with appearance, but they won’t dent the general trend of declining birth rate and loneliness. Lay down culture will only get worse as the average man is being priced out due to economic trends. Kind of like the Beautiful Ones mouse experiment. The society had to collapse before there is a reset.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/04/26 06:41 PM
–	Women don’t owe it to society to raise birth rates No. We just more worried about 'Idiocracy' becoming reality.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/04/26 05:16 PM
5	Lauren Sanchez is the opposite of what Red Pillers are telling us that men want in women and shows that women just have to be hot and seductive Great comment. Bezos wasn't even self-made; his parents provided the initial capital for his start. The story of most billionaires is one of entitlement and inheritance from their wealthy parents that devolves into an inbred, perverted aristocracy within a generation or two. We need to tax billionaires so they stop polluting the government and gene pool with psychotic idiots.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 05:05 PM
4	Part of the growing divide between men and women comes from the idea that men should silently accept misandry as justified payback for patriarchy This is the correct answer. Most of the modern feminism gender dysfunction started as an oligarch project back in the 1960's. It had more to do with a race to the bottom, suppressing wage growth, and keeping the peasants in their place than the rights of women. The nuclear family where the wife works is at home while the husband only existed for a couple decades. For most of history, the majority of people were subsistence farmers. The whole family worked for much of the year, with downtime duri…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/04/25 04:32 PM
–	I think before anything, The system of men chasing and women choosing needs to change I was enjoying it but quickly recognized it wasn't condusive to keeping a long term marriage. I would say my experience is more common and the successful Stay-at-home Dad is very much the exception. Statistically Stay-at-home Dads are only like 18% compared to 72% for Stay-at-home Moms. We are likely at the peak. Not that it matters, (with a 50% failure rate on marriages) since our corporate oligarchs and their politician stooges have largely made the concept of the stay-at-home parent outdated …	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/02/24 11:55 AM
–	I think before anything, The system of men chasing and women choosing needs to change It will never will be normalized. There just won't be statistically enough stay-at-home Dads (in a world of declining marriage rates and birth rates) and many of those in marriages won't make it simply because of their wives losing respect and monkey branching. I was briefly a stay-at-home Dad of a newborn after losing a job and going on unemployment. My wife became unhappy being the breadwinner and the relationship started to go south. I quickly got back into the workforce with a higher paying …	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/02/24 02:13 AM
–	Seriously, how is the average joe supposed to be happy if he is never desired? Certainly people lived into old age and you are right about lifespan. Some periods were calmer than others, notably when war and plague were absent and climate was favorable. I wouldn't have wanted to live during the 14th century.... I also get choice paralysis often and can never find anything to watch, Movie or TV, anymore. I don't play video games much for the same reason. I rationalize something is too long, too short, not striking my mood, or it can wait another day. There are too many opti…	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/01/24 10:29 PM
–	Seriously, how is the average joe supposed to be happy if he is never desired? Very true. Even then it was random to find a good marriage. In the medieval period, your eligible mating pool wasn't often very large, maybe from a couple villages in a region. Life could be harsh and hard, childbirth was perilous, war and plague endemic, no antibiotics, so the average lifespan was like 31. A couple would be lucky to be married for twenty years. I am Gen X so I remember how dating was before technology, even then it could suck and finding that partner was a challenge. There was …	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/01/24 10:00 PM
–	Seriously, how is the average joe supposed to be happy if he is never desired? Chance is a massive factor. You can improve your odds in things like career, wealth, skills, dating but success is often a matter of luck but effort alone is by no means a guarantee. The average person has no control over their genetics or circumstances of their parents. Nobody really wants to give 'luck' that much credence because it threatens the illusionary notion that there is 'justice' , 'virtue', or 'merit' in this completely amoral universe. It does really sucks for the average guy right …	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/01/24 07:48 PM
1	Avoiding the Coming Demographic Collapse Agree. It is not necessary on a planet with finite resources. That is a whole another issue too.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/12/23 05:24 PM
2	Avoiding the Coming Demographic Collapse I am talking about game-changing invention and innovation, usually done by high IQ people which 8 out of 9 are men. Usually because they are near-autistic, on the spectrum, and there is a correlation with testosterone. Men can be at both extremes of the curve on intelligence while women tend to occupy the middle ground. Not saying there aren't genius women, there are women in that IQ range, but they aren't innovating society changing technologies. Most of the major advances have been invented by…	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/12/23 02:23 PM
2	Avoiding the Coming Demographic Collapse Not as many are you think. 137 to 160 is the top 1%. Einstein was a 160 IQ, those are the people that truly innovate and invent. That IQ level is like 0.03% of the population. So out of 3.5 Billion Males, that means 105,000,000 across the world at that level. The United States currently has 162.4 million males. That means roughly a pool of 4,872,000 men. How many are criminals, drug addicts, slackers, or born in poverty? How many are doing unproductive things like entertainment or programming vi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/12/23 04:17 AM
0	Avoiding the Coming Demographic Collapse The problem is with aging demographics you decrease innovation which mostly comes from a small pool of male geniuses on the spectrum. It is depressing, but our future will have many elements of ‘Children of Men’. Unstable, authoritarian, and swaths of abandoned buildings.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/12/23 01:57 AM
4	Want to solve the male loneliness epidemic? Stop letting kids play video games and promote outdoor activities instead It is well documented that two parent homes are better than a single parent as an outcome for children. https://time.com/6317692/u-s-economy-two-parent-families/ I wasn't making a value judgement which gender is at fault. You have terrible mothers that would rather party and do drugs while the father is responsible, and certainly visa versa. The more common occurrence is both parents suck and likely shouldn't be breeding in the first place but that is a completely different topic. The lower end …	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/12/23 08:43 PM
3	Want to solve the male loneliness epidemic? Stop letting kids play video games and promote outdoor activities instead It is not just the Ghetto. Broken and dysfunctional families are kind of the norm, even in those lower middle class communities as well. The marriage rate is under 50% and continuing to fall. My point was simply a woman married to a poor father is preferable to a single mother for children. I don't disagree with you and sometimes that is the case in my neighborhood. Fentanyl is a big problem and at times even parks can become unsafe.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/12/23 02:51 PM
17	Want to solve the male loneliness epidemic? Stop letting kids play video games and promote outdoor activities instead Those poor kids aren't coming from 'married' homes anymore. The majority have a so-called 'Mother' who simply has a rotation of baby daddies who aren't in any sense a 'Father' (often in prison). Likely most are barely raised by an elderly family member. Any kind of marriage with two parents would be positive for children no matter socio-economic status. That is a far better outcome than a single mother making weekly breeding decisions based on available booze, drugs, and cash.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/12/23 02:19 PM
1	From a cold, practical perspective isn't women's emancipation bad for society if it leads to low birth rates What utter nonsense. You have no idea of my career or expertise. The only longevity research you likely have done is checking the expiration dates on a carton of milk.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/12/23 01:03 AM
2	From a cold, practical perspective isn't women's emancipation bad for society if it leads to low birth rates One can make predictions of the future based on history and biology. The notion of a 'stop aging' drug is pure copium and fantasy at this point. Again, only the wealthy would be allowed access. Innovation requires a younger, more dynamic society and ours is becoming, old, tired, and depressed. It is in many ways like the rats in the 'Beautiful Ones' experiment. The more comfortable we become the more likely we will fail. Most civilizations inevitably fail, decline, and collapse. The more technic…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/12/23 09:35 PM
1	From a cold, practical perspective isn't women's emancipation bad for society if it leads to low birth rates Even if an 'aging cure' was invented, it will only affordable to the wealthy, and not for the masses. We can't even get any reasonable reforms for healthcare now. Never mind all the plastics and chemicals that are affecting sperm counts.. The thing about aging societies are they also less dynamic and decrease their chances at technical innovations. We had a long period of revolutionary innovation but now seem to be making marginal, incremental technical achievements. I don't believe you can 'inn…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/12/23 04:26 AM
1	From a cold, practical perspective isn't women's emancipation bad for society if it leads to low birth rates I already have kids. I would have liked to have more. Cost.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/12/23 12:08 AM
1	From a cold, practical perspective isn't women's emancipation bad for society if it leads to low birth rates Great comment and good analysis. I would add pharmaceutical innovations with birth control was a technical innovation that massively changed society.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/12/23 05:52 PM
4	From a cold, practical perspective isn't women's emancipation bad for society if it leads to low birth rates Unfortunately that kind of society can never last over the long haul, especially as neoliberals are hellbent on undermining civil liberties to establish a new corporate feudalism where you will own nothing. Societies that are more religious and fundamentalist will outbreed and overwhelm secular and libertarian ones. They always get undermined from within, wealthy oligarchs will even enable this process via corproate greed and immigration in the name of quarterly profits. You can have all the lat…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/12/23 05:32 PM
1	Men can't cold approach, but they can't ask out their female friends either. What options are we left with? Good comment and spot on. Aristocracy always leads to tyranny. Always.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/07/23 11:53 PM
4	What can South Korean Population collapse tell us about the future of gender and dating in the West? Sadly that isn't preventable. Aging populace will turn things more 'Children of Men' as economic decline tends to bring out violent behavior and competition for dwindling resources.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/11/22 03:52 AM
3	In terms of Women's Interests, Can Men (and Monogamy) Be Saved? All of society benefits from children. Exactly why we are on the decline. If you aren't above 2.1 births per woman, you are a declining, decaying, aging society who loses its edge and ability to innovate. The fertility rate in the US has been in the 1.78 range for a number of years, not as bad as Russia, Ukraine, Germany, or Japan, South Korea, all down in the 1.4 path to extinction, but that rate is still not good. It is a simple cost/benefit calculation. In more tribal, agrarian societies, chi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/07/22 04:37 PM
1	New article: 50% of single US adults are not looking for relationships or casual dates No one is saying society will collapse because birth rates drop due to men checking out or whatever Actually society can collapse due to low birth rates. An aging populace is less dynamic, growth halts, and society unravels as there is not enough 'youth' for manual labor. You can make exoskeletons or ass-wiping robots for the elderly, but that won't save a civilization in the end. The South Koreans and several other nations are facing extinction. https://www.wionews.com/world/crisis-of-extinctio…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/06/22 11:04 AM
3	Booh, evil Kevin Samuels follower Welfare is the reason why the United States of America is going bankrupt. I agree. It won't stop either. We are a corrupt oligarchy whose politicians can be bought legally. The vast majority of money printing is 'welfare' (CARES Act, PPP Loans) for large corporations, the wealthy, and banks; most run by psychopaths and pedophiles. Our politicians are cheap whores, who happily pulled down their pants, spread their cheeks, and bent over for Chinese Communists and Multi-National Corporations for 50…	/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen	09/02/22 12:06 PM
1	What's the appeal of women to you? The move "Idiocracy" details the exact scenario of educated people not reproducing. That movie is so damn prophetic.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/08/21 08:23 PM
2	Saying "life isn't fair" for dating inequality is the same as "life isn't fair" for economic inequality Exactly. Reaganism was about the acceleration of shipping male breadwinner jobs oversees which was a huge factor in decreasing marriage rate and breakup of the nuclear family. The best part was the Democrats under Clinton in the 90's decided to adopt Reaganism as their economic ideology. Now there could be 'bipartisanship' in the race to the bottom. The result is a plunging marriage rate, low birth rate, decaying infrastructure, outsourced manufacturing, and declining society.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/07/21 11:43 AM
2	Saying "life isn't fair" for dating inequality is the same as "life isn't fair" for economic inequality America has A LOT of uneducated trump Trump and Biden supporters who unironically vote against their own economic interests. Fixed that for you. The notion the Democratic Party, who are shameless corporate ass-lickers (that support many of the same awful neoliberal, globalist policies as the Republicans) care about the economic interest of the public is utterly laughable.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/07/21 11:28 AM
2	We are headed for a huge population cliff mainly because men and women have been conditioned to hate each other. None of those wonderful technical achievements can happen in decaying, aging, society with below replacement fertility. Innovation is the first thing that goes in an aging populace. Statistically, a lower birth rate reduces the pool of already rare autistic spectrum high IQ males that invent everything. This whole notion of robot sex dolls or artificial wombs is nonsense. We will never get there and instead look more like "Idiocracy". An entertainment and image obsessed society whose infrastruct…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/07/21 08:01 PM
11	We are headed for a huge population cliff mainly because men and women have been conditioned to hate each other. It is very fascinating and is quite ominous about our future. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-mouse-utopias-1960s-led-grim-predictions-humans-180954423/#:~:text=Sometimes%20they'd%20drop%20and,eat%20and%20groom%20and%20sleep.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/07/21 07:51 PM
1	What will be the effects of the present dating market 10 years from now? Yep. Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/06/why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group/ Christianity will actually shrink across the western world and is a slowly decaying religion. The have been bleeding men for years and increasingly congregations are women dominated. https://www.amazon.com/Losing-Good-Portion-Alienated-Christianity-ebook/dp/B086D5NXZD	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/07/21 03:03 AM
1	What will be the effects of the present dating market 10 years from now? Eventually the immigrants will simply take over. It happened with the Germanic tribes and the Roman Empire. When there are two groups in conflict, the one with more younger, aggressive males will triumph. Eventually the immigration spigot will shut off from Central and South America as those countries are decreasing in fertility. Most of the planet has below replacement fertility, under 2.1 except in Africa, which will account for most of the population growth this century. I expect climate chan…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/07/21 02:19 AM
1	What will be the effects of the present dating market 10 years from now? That trick won't work for much longer. Most Central American and South American countries are decreasing in fertility. They won't allow their young to migrate once they start falling below 2.1. The only way out is the good, old, fashioned way, otherwise watch your populace age out and economy crumble.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/07/21 01:37 AM
1	What will be the effects of the present dating market 10 years from now? (Russia, China) which are far more masculine are going to militarily and economically kick our ass. I agree with many ideas in your post but it won't be China and Russia "kicking our ass". Their fertility and demographics are even worse than ours. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/total-fertility-rate/country-comparison 140 United States 1.84 2021 est. 184 Russia 1.60 2021 est. 185 China 1.60 2021 est. China will need to start a war to simply get rid of their excess male populace do t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/07/21 01:34 AM
14	The rise of sexlessness among men is NOT NORMAL, the reasons given for that is major coping by men and female gaslighting to hide the real reason. Women are not having less sex they are just having fewer sexual partners. There certainly is a point past which excessive male sexlessness could be a problem in and of itself, as well as indicative of other, perhaps more important, problems. You correct. It is a huge problem that problem manifests itself in the demographics. Certainly technology and birth control are key reasons for the decrease, but you sort of need people having sex in order to reproduce. Why do you think many governments are utterly freaking out over the fertility rate and horrid demographics? If y…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/07/21 03:41 AM
1	If you believe the core tenant of masculinity is the subjugation of others, you can’t be upset that many thus associate masculinity negatively. Nice comment and thanks for bringing some actual biology to the discussion. Humans are a mammal and primate species and we still share some basic commonalities with other species. https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/male-reproductive-strategies-71224983/	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/07/21 11:28 PM
1	"Admitting" sexlessness or "dating privileges" are a problem or that they exist, or empathy about it, won't change the facts in any way. So why does it matter? True. It could be way worse.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/06/21 12:48 AM
1	"Admitting" sexlessness or "dating privileges" are a problem or that they exist, or empathy about it, won't change the facts in any way. So why does it matter? Then you'll need a stronger immigration program because that paradigm you are proposing will have as its immediate consequence an off-the-cliff style steep drop in childbirths That won't work. Most Central and South American countries are also starting to suffer declining birthrates and eventually the immigration spigot will be turned off. The only parts of the world with high birthrates with excess populace will be in Africa, who has a fundamentalist religious view of the world. The 'immigratio…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/06/21 11:27 AM
1	Why do people insist that only women postpone having kids when many women risk becoming single mothers to have kids? No. That is not my argument. It is the fault of largely wealthy rich short-sighted elites who decided to fuck society for profit margins. Our society chose to get rid of nuclear families led by a mother and father, just like it chose to destroy extended families and communities during industrialization from the agrarian age. Progress and technical innovation doesn't always lead to long-term success. Our elites destroyed the family but did nothing about the fertility rate...so our society will be…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/06/21 03:45 PM
2	Why do people insist that only women postpone having kids when many women risk becoming single mothers to have kids? due to a shortage of jobs for less educated men. You are totally correct. Welfare did not cause the destruction of the nuclear family. The destruction of the family goes back to the 1960's and was accelerated by the wonderous disease of neoliberalism and globalism. The United States aristocracy decided in the name of 'Bipartisanship' to export all their manufacturing jobs to the third world for share prices and profit margins. They didn't care the country would become a slowly dying, decaying sh…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/06/21 04:25 AM
3	How much does sexlessness among men have to rise for society to stop functioning? Last I checked, Homo Sapiens are still a mammal that conform to biological rules and not a fairy unicorn. This topic has been studied for years. Abundance and lack of purpose can lead to fertility rate crashes, especially when you society is poorly managed and corrupt. That leads to economic and societal decline and sexlessness will lead to eventual collapse. https://www.google.com/search?q=the+beautiful+ones+experiment&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS902US902&oq=&aqs=chrome.4.35i39i362l2j46i39i362j35i39i362l4j…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/06/21 08:15 PM
1	Hypergamy, female subjugation & male sexlesness. Good points. I liken our civilization to the Roman Empire. Augustus, the creator of the office of Emperor even during its peak lamented the young men of Rome not marrying. A neoliberal death cult has taken away meaning for most men with their globalist economic policies and literally poisoned men to reduce their testosterone. Like Rome, the barbarians will come to your gates and all the drones and gadgets in the world won't save Western Civilization. The side with younger, stronger males wins in…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/06/21 04:57 PM
3	People are underestimating the popularity of the childfree movement in Gen Z. I just want to live out the rest of my days in peace. I doubt you will get your wish to live in peace. Our declining fertility, aging populace, and decaying civilization will likely give us a 'Children of Men' future rife with more violence, turbulence, and conflict. All you can do is live your best life. You can't control the rest.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/06/21 04:41 PM
1	Hypergamy, female subjugation & male sexlesness. What we are seeing is completely unprecedented. Agreed. This was ironically foretold decades ago. I remember studying the 'Beautiful Ones' experiment my freshman year in college. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-mouse-utopias-1960s-led-grim-predictions-humans-180954423/#:~:text=Sometimes%20they'd%20drop%20and,eat%20and%20groom%20and%20sleep. "At the peak population, most mice spent every living second in the company of hundreds of other mice. They gathered in the main squares, waiti…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/06/21 12:29 AM
2	Hypergamy, female subjugation & male sexlesness. Population decline will be a reality that bites hard in about 50 years for most countries. That 'import' strategy will fail ultimately. Many of the countries in South and Central America exporting populace to the United States also have declining birth rates and at a certain point will be forced to turn off the spigot. Once you go below that 2.1 birthrate that 'Children of Men' decline turns into a death spiral. The only parts of the planet with growing populaces full of young, aggressive males …	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/06/21 11:49 PM
1	Hypergamy, female subjugation & male sexlesness. Totally agree. Our corrupt defense industry and their ass-licking politicians in both parties have for decades turned the United States military into a sad mercenary for hire outfit for dictators, criminals, drug-dealers, and multi-national corporations. Such a compulsory program would be an excuse to double the defense budget and erode what few civil liberties we have left. Why would we trust the very government who implemented all these anti-male policies in the first place to now fix them? Fu…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/06/21 11:04 PM
7	Births fall to 42-year low in U.S., new CDC data shows! China has been no more effective at solving the problem than any other first world nation. Their one-child policy was rather short-sighted and foolish. China as of 2020, depending on source, 1.6 to 1.7 births per woman, well below the 2.1 threshold. They also have the problem of a skewed gender ratio. Likely why China is belligerent to their neighbors, they need a good war to shed the excess male population.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/05/21 02:38 AM
1	This is kind of a sister sub of r/CapitalismVSocialism And we are very close to the singularity in which almost all human skills can be traded by machines, and yes, it includes creativity and imagination Nope. LooseIndication is right, resource abundance is the problem.. Human beings will never get to that wonderful place of AI singularity and will self-destruct long before that point. The more likely outcome is we tear the society down ourselves largely because our technology has outpaced biology. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-mouse…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/11/20 02:37 PM
5	Why are 30% of Gen Z women not attracted to men? What happens if males don't feel like upping their game in those terms and just do their own thing and say "fuck all this noise" instead? Society falls apart. Men either build civilization for Women or tear it down for Women. Sometimes they do both. I think there is something to having abundant resources and the removal of hardship. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-mouse-utopias-1960s-led-grim-predictions-humans-180954423/#:~:text=The%20few%20secluded%20spaces%20housed,eat%20and%20g…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/10/20 05:05 PM
4	Why do so many men believe that women prefer partners that treat them bad. It is completely a math issue. Lemon_Stealer and other women posting they can't find men are indeed running into a numbers problem. Even using the basic calculation of a generic 'Good Man' defined as 25-35, physically fit, college educated, over 6'0 tall (5 feet 9 inches tall is average for men). There are around 23,000,000 men (2019 figure) in the United States and 22,000,000 women in the 25-35 range. Sexual orientation reduces these totals down to 21,965,000 men (4%) and 20,900,000 women (5%).…	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/10/20 03:38 AM
1	What do you think is making men so unattractive to women? Good point. It is quite common for serial-killers and infamous criminals to get tons of love letters in prison.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/02/20 09:42 PM
1	What do you think is making men so unattractive to women? and if they’re reasonably intelligent and have access to birth control in their state, and hose men do not father their children. The problem is that 'reasonably intelligent' men and women are a minority of the populace. You are talking about a small slice of women who are in the upper or middle class. The picture is very different for the working and lower classes. The women from the lower classes who become single mothers tend choose poorly. They do tend to procreate with thugs and deadbeats a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/02/20 08:52 PM
2	What do you think is making men so unattractive to women? Women today are not choosing warlord-type men to father their children Not quite. Women in the Middle East and Africa are either told by their fathers which men will father their children or when their country destabilizes they get the warlord option. Violence is on the decline in the United States in part because we have an aging population but mostly due to general prosperity. We produce so much we have an epidemic of fat, lazy, and sick people. There are still women in this country who choose…	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/02/20 04:30 AM
2	What do you think is making men so unattractive to women? You are not rambling. Lack of fathers, dropping testosterone levels, educational system failing boys, etc. are factors as to the modern state of men but the 'purpose' you listed is the main reason. I think the famous Chuck Palahniuk quote sums up the problem ““We’re the middle children of history. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War’s a spiritual war… our Great Depression is our lives. We’ve all been raised on television to believe that one day we’d all …	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/02/20 04:05 AM
1	The Not-So-Great Reason Divorce Rates Are Declining Several things. 'Ass' is also by definition as 'stupid, foolish, and stubborn person'. That is a characteristic of extreme leftist activists. They are 'asses'. Leftist run hellholes are often overrun with homeless people shitting in the streets. The connection to 'ass' there is quite obvious.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/12/19 11:05 PM
1	The Not-So-Great Reason Divorce Rates Are Declining I wasn't talking about gay people. I was talking about Leftism. Leftism = Ass Cancer.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/12/19 04:09 AM
1	The Not-So-Great Reason Divorce Rates Are Declining Ass Cancer is not an alternative to religion. It is simply a terrible disease that always ends in poverty, misery, and masses of people shitting in the streets.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/12/19 03:50 AM
1	Is it time to admit that egalitarianism is a dead end for most men? There's no decline, only expansion The below replacement demographics of the first world are measurable statistics that disprove that rather foolish notion. There isn't going to be 'expansion' but painful contraction and instability due to an aging populace. The only 'expansion' will be from third world populaces whose beliefs don't give a shit about women's rights and see them little more than breeding machines.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/19 03:46 PM
3	Women Fantasising About Traditional Families -AKA WAATGM This. 100%. Hurricane Katrina was quite illuminating on 'civilization'. Things broke down pretty fast. It turns out the line between civilization and savagery is about 3 days of food.	/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen	09/11/19 04:01 AM
1	Traditional gender roles were never two sides of the same value, and talking about happiness is irrelevant No. Just calling out stupidity and low effort thinking.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/09/19 12:42 AM
-1	Traditional gender roles were never two sides of the same value, and talking about happiness is irrelevant What a dumb fucking comment. The vast majority of men were peasants, serfs, or slaves and also didn't have 'rights'. The only men with 'rights' were kings, emperors, warlords, knights, etc., a very small section of the populace. Typical feminist apex fallacy bullshit. The vast majority men and women lived harsh, short, and shitty lives. Many of the rights women gained weren't too much longer after lower class men who didn't own property.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/09/19 02:20 AM
2	Q4All: What happens to the increasingly large amount of "left behind" & undesirable men in the dating marketplace? Fallout for society? Men also need to be taught to not be losers. Too bad there are no teachers. That used to be the job of a rare species call 'fathers' that were once present in the home. A bunch of 'greedy corproate globalists' in the 70's decided to send decent jobs to the third world which eliminated many male breadwinners. At the same time a bunch of shit-eating marxist hippies felt the institution of marriage sucked and wanted to tear down the entire social-fabric like the French Revolution. The father was re…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/08/19 03:49 AM
2	Q4All: What happens to the increasingly large amount of "left behind" & undesirable men in the dating marketplace? Fallout for society? Indeed. Human beings especially turn into violent and ruthless assholes if deprived of food, shelter, and comfort. It didn't take long during Hurricane Katrina for that nasty turn to occur. People vastly overestimate human moral nature. It is entirely dependent on resources and hunger.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/08/19 02:28 AM
8	CMV: The feminization of society is not such a bad thing In nordic countries where equality is most present you really don't have these issues. The opposite is the case. Sweden is so 'enlightened' their gender-tolerant leftist idiot leaders made the stupid decision to import 10% of their populace from third world right-wing masculine cultures in the Africa and the Middle East. I guess that is why in Sweden and Germany the women have problems going to music festivals or walking alone after dark. The rape epidemic is mainly done by the very males they i…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/08/19 10:59 PM
1	Why do Red Pillers fetishize traditional masculinity? Take it back a few hundred years. Even 100 years. Every single male young and old benefits from everything in society. Your argument is utter garbage and complete nonsense. A hundred years ago it wasn't a privilege for a man to be sent into the shit infested trenches of France while his wife and children toiled even harder to survive back home. Before 1900 very few people 'benefitted' from society. Life was harsh and hard. Most people, men, women, and children, worked their asses off in the fiel…	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/08/19 10:48 PM
2	Q4ALL: Has dating in the past 10 years become easier, or more difficult? Why for either case? Agree. There is also that 'math' issue where college educated women are now 60% of graduates. The pool of educated men has shrunk and there aren't enough to go around.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/19 01:31 AM
6	Q4ALL: Has dating in the past 10 years become easier, or more difficult? Why for either case? What society doesn't seem to grasp however is that the number of losers is increasing each year, and it's largely society's own fault. This. 1000%. No advanced civilization can survive such large numbers of 'sexless male losers' as it will decline, become unstable, and eventually collapse. The only solution historically tended to be warfare to kill off the excess male populace. That is not exactly a pleasant solution given modern technology.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/07/19 01:23 AM
2	If you had to implement social policies/programs to solve the male sexlessness problem ..that doesn't infringe on people rights I really feel for all the low skill people in the future, there won't be anyway for them to make a living. Given population demographics and increasing urbanization it means more and more people will live in ghettos. They will do other things than 'work' like deal drugs, steal, vandalize, murder, loot, and rape. That tends to happen when you have large numbers of resource poor young males and lack of opportunity. Civilizations tend to go down when that happens.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/05/19 03:00 AM
3	Biological father should always be held responsible for child support, otherwise every tax payer is BB. It's women who need the lecture - especially the ones who produce these OOW kids with deadbeats and can't seem to get it right by doing it again...and again. This. 1000% with Facts and supporting evidence. Argument over.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/05/19 05:20 PM
2	The hot, attractive women who party a lot don't hit the wall, it's actually the high achieving, unattractive women Living your life with the goal of pissing others off is the height a being a loser. Wrong. It means you are a human being. Our species quite tribal and lives to piss off other human beings. Look at how easy people getting factional in divisive discussing sports and politics. The whole concept of humor was invented on the misfortune of others. There is a biological basis to distrust strangers and those perceived as a threat. If someone is in an 'enemy' tribe, the human brain does mental gymnastic…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/05/19 02:14 AM
3	British Medical Journal: "People are having less sex" I recommend that men should become more useful so you don't phase yourself out. Keep in mind that men won't just phase themselves out, they'll also phase women out as well. Civilizations become unstable shitholes when there are large numbers of sexless and poor young men. Many of the things you list about men were detailed in the rather prophetic 'Beautiful Ones' study that was run back in the 1960's. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-mouse-utopias-1960s-led-grim-predictions-humans-1…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/19 02:59 AM
1	Economist article on lack of sex amongst millennial men Good points. Tribalism is a species feature of our species. Our identity is not just tied to supporting our favorite sports team, political party, nation, or religion; it is even more so tied to hating rival 'tribes'. I think it is evolutionary. We evolved to be very hyper-competitive as early on we weren't the only hominid species. After our cousins went extinct we only had each other, and that led to where we are now..	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/05/19 02:48 AM
1	Economist article on lack of sex amongst millennial men The 'Brave New World' did win out because many of these 'guys' were raised by some shitty low quality whore lazing around dating sites who was a 'mother' in name only. The guy really didn't have a father or mother and was literally raised by a television, game console, and internet. That is all he knows. It goes to prove that for every useless deadbeat male, there is always a female who is the cause.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/05/19 02:09 AM
1	Economist article on lack of sex amongst millennial men Men not getting laid en masse is a problem, but its connection to violence is tenuous. Human morality is quite mutable and entirely depends on access to food, resources, and shelter. If oil production stopped tomorrow in about 2 weeks people will start murdering each over can goods. The percentage of men not successfully providing for themselves is increasing and any depression or severe downturn will be trouble. Most civilizations can't survive resource scarcity and large numbers of sexually fr…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/05/19 01:40 AM
1	Economist article on lack of sex amongst millennial men Women want to be able to do what men have been able to do for centuries. Have choices. That is complete nonsense. Most of your male ancestors lived short and shitty lives of backbreaking drudgery or brutal violence. A majority of men lacked 'choices' as they toiled for some lord like a mule. Most men were 'privileged' if they had food for winter, didn't get killed in war, not die of plague, not lose their wife in childbirth, and most of the children survived to adulthood. The truth is 99% of men…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/05/19 12:04 AM
1	Economist article on lack of sex amongst millennial men I'm saying Trump is a symptom of a larger social ill, in this case an increasing population of isolated, depressed, angry young men. Civilizations tend to come apart when there are large numbers of angry and disaffected young men. The solution to the problem tends to be warfare.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/05/19 09:11 PM
1	Why didn't prehistoric humans kill sexual competitors? I think humans do have more capacity for deceit and resentment for evolutionary reasons. Keep in mind, human morality is largely a mutable thing based on comfort and resources. If you shut off the gas spigot tomorrow, in about three weeks as civilization collapses people will murder each other for can goods. There were once many hominid species on this planet and when the dust settled there was only one left, us. Homo Sapiens won the 'Game of Hominids' not by being the strongest. Neanderthals by…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/05/19 03:48 AM
2	CMV: TRP is the one platform that gives low value men good advice on how to improve themselves yet instead of being promoted, it gets scorned. It is not a problem if it works. Never ever conflate 'moral' and 'attractive' because they are concepts that are independent of each other. Serial killers that are attractive receive tons of love letters from women all the time. The most successful men on this planet tend to be narcissistic, ruthless, sociopathic, and arrogant to varying degrees. Never overestimate the 'morality' of our species which is largely mutable and changeable based on food and resources.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/05/19 10:39 PM
1	You cannot be pro-male and pro-female. The sexual and relationship market places are a zero sum game. To want better for one sex, is to want things to be worse for the other. It's silly to imagine a species at war with itself. Evolution makes it quite imaginable. We were not always the only hominid species on this planet and competed with our 'cousin' species over food, resources, and land. We took their hunting grounds, food, genetic traits, and most certainly killed them as rivals. Homo Sapien evolved to be quite competitive and in the end was the only hominid species left standing. That competitive drive didn't go away as we are quite competitive against other hum…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/19 11:57 AM
1	Would single motherhood really decrease if child support and welfare were abolished? Do you really want to live in the Dystopian world you're advocating? You don't 'reward' negative behavior if you want it to stop. Enabling the behavior will create that dystopian state. These programs have to be funded. Eventually due to declining birthrates, economic contraction, and high national debt there won't be a welfare state. If you want to keep these social programs longterm it will require taking measures that will be seen as ruthless. There are women and men who genuinely fall on har…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/04/19 02:56 AM
4	We know women don’t want to sex every man, okay so now what? That is happening in Japan but isn't very sustainable in the long run. Japan right now is developing exoskeletons for middle age people to do work because they won't have enough younger people to do physical labor for goods and products. Not a good sign. As their population continues to age most of their GDP will go into developing robots to wipe elderly asses instead of things like consumer goods, exports, and innovation. The few younger people who are left won't exactly be pleased their payche…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/04/19 04:16 AM
1	We know women don’t want to sex every man, okay so now what? But won’t humanity die out if everyone stops marrying and having babies, you say? Yes. So what. I understand your sentiment. We as individuals can't change societal trends. Agree there. I disagree the phenomenon of poor fertility would ever affect the whole species. Humans evolved to outcompete other hominids after all, then after they went extinct, we competed with each other. We are a tribal species still and some will use numbers as a means to compete. It is a valid biological strategy. In th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/04/19 03:50 AM
1	Discussion: the left is incapable of dealing with the current masculinity crisis. The left did not champion policies that removed fathers from homes. There was no law that said fathers had to leave the homes. It was called the 'Great Society' and it was put into place in the 1960's. https://atlantablackstar.com/2014/12/24/ways-war-poverty-destroyed-black-fatherhood/ "The growing absence of fathers in American households — particularly in the African-American community — has been studied by academicians for decades, with liberal and conservative writers and policymakers squari…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/04/19 12:12 AM
4	Discussion: the left is incapable of dealing with the current masculinity crisis. Not quite. The left gleefully championed social welfare policies in the 70's that removed fathers from the home. The globalist right aided the destruction of the family for simple greed by sending industrial jobs oversees. It was in the 90's the so-called 'left' decided to embrace the globalist economic policies of the globalist right. This was bait-and-switch 'centrism' which was nothing more than open thievery of resources by multi-national corporations and bankers. Neither side cared about th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/04/19 04:06 PM
1	Discussion: the left is incapable of dealing with the current masculinity crisis. The fastest growing religion in the world is a regressive right-wing ideology that the left-wing wackos go out of their way defend simply because of their pathological racism and sexism towards white males and self-loathing of western civilization.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/04/19 03:26 PM
-1	Discussion: the left is incapable of dealing with the current masculinity crisis. I would say the economic policies of the left are quite a problem for 'masculinity'. There are biological and evolutionary reasons why matriarchal societies never developed beyond hunter/gatherers. Inner cities ghettos are a prime example of what happens when you force female led households. The left-wing social engineering in the 1970's to destroyed the nuclear family if the lower class through welfare. They removed fathers from the home and in combination with right-wing policies shipped indus…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/04/19 02:24 PM