TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RichardRogers Archive

View 0 posts and 94 comments by RichardRogers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This sub has always been full of incels, but the women are still lying.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 02:09 AM
2

Come on, "decent human being"? Props for ditching the ethnosexual politics but attacking pro-lifers as blanketly immoral is probably the worst thing you can do to entrench them in their beliefs and convince them that our beliefs are generated by Satanic influence instead of a shared desire for human well-being. Pro-life and pro-choice are both predicated on the same uncompromisable value: that the vulnerable must be protected. That's why it's such a contentious issue, attacking the other side's …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:48 PM
2

Bruh this isn't sexual subcommunication. This is overt spaghetti falling out of your pockets.
/r/seduction21/03/18 06:47 PM
2

Fantastic post, OP! A lot of the content in this sub is jargony PUA schlock but this is solid, straightforward advice that every man has to learn at some point. Invest your attention and effort into girls who are eager and responsive, those are the ones where you'll find a genuine connection (even if it's brief and casual). The alternative is to waste your time chasing after girls who aren't really interested; it's obvious in hindsight but it can be hard to see that for what it is when your sche…
/r/seduction07/03/18 09:42 PM
7

I don't really feel comfortable pushing it when a girl acts unsure towards having sex. I know some people here say it's simply a "shit test" when a woman says she's not sure if she wants to have sex, but to me that comes off as extremely rapey and weird. You're 100% right on this one. If a girl is just worried or ashamed you can definitely ease her into it and make her comfortable to act on her interest, like you did here. But otherwise if she's interested she'll act on it, and it's irresponsibl…
/r/seduction26/02/18 11:54 PM
1

you lame is it the mid-2000's? am i in eighth grade again?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 06:18 PM
7

I don't think it's a genuine demand that we should think men have it worse, but that if we are going to play those games we should consider that when women were being forced into housework, men were being forced into combat. In other words, it's mostly about providing context. The claim that women were mistreated is true, but it's usually put forth in a way which asserts or at least unsubtly implies that women were mistreated compared to men, which is dubious at best when you consider that some …
/r/MensRights08/09/15 08:32 PM
3

I still think that we as adult men have a certain amount of responsibility to where we plant our seed as it were Again, why? We've already established that it's completely up to the gardener whether the seed grows or not. It's their land; even in the case where you recklessly scatter your seeds, why should you ever have to water their plants? To say flatly that all men are no longer responsible for supporting children they helped conceive seems a bit short sighted. Why does conception matter at …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:19 AM
10

For example, the lesser of our gender might just run rampant, inseminating anything and everything with the mind set of "Your body, your problem". Well, why exactly should that be their responsibility? The women involved in your scenario are also having unprotected sex. If the argument for abortion is that pregnancy is solely a matter of women's bodies and men have no rights involved, then why are men obligated to make the decision against pregnancy for those women who've decided not to use cont…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:56 AM
4

I'm not sure if you're joking or earnestly repeating grandpa's facebook status.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 04:08 PM
11

Yes, it is. As long as there are no children involved and everyone is consenting, the government has no business regulating the content of porn. This particular regulation is a little bit nuanced and i'm fuzzy on it; I think the intent was to control how much of the genitals could be shown in non-pornographic media, but somehow affected porn too. Regardless, it's needlessly intrusive and should be opposed.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:36 AM
20

I don't think doctors encourage it for their patients of either gender, but there's definitely social pressure in the US. Have you ever heard a woman say she thinks a circumcised penis "just looks nicer"? I won't say it's the majority since I honestly have no data, but any time it comes up there's inevitably someone who will say that, and in my experience it's usually women. Now imagine the reaction if a man supported routine labiaplasty of infant girls on the grounds that he thinks it's better …
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:30 AM
4

...that's not the subreddit you're commenting on...?
/r/MensRights23/07/15 10:52 PM
-1

Probably has some ironic tattoo? Check Wait, did you just check something off after merely asserting its likelihood? You turned out right but come on...
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:00 PM
30

They compare it to guys buying new clothes or getting a haircut and feeling good about themselves. Bitch I only do those things for dates and job interviews, otherwise those are just two annoying chores. Not every man is like that. I for one love buying new clothes and getting a haircut... ...because it makes me more attractive to my girlfriend and also to other women, thereby making me even more attractive to my girlfriend. This woman is kidding herself if she thinks taking pride in one's appea…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 08:56 PM
3

Motherfucker if you want to be on the caveman team then be my guest, but pretty girls have standards these days and they don't want to suck on sweaty hairy balls. Get your shit together goddamn.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 01:41 AM
3

everyone internalizes things from their culture, just accept that fact now. This is a motte-and-bailey argument. Of course everyone internalizes things from their culture, I'm saying that if you recognize that you've internalized something that you think is wrong, you should be able to reject it instead of letting it continue to bother her as she does. FTA: "I realize the most properly-feminist response to all of this would be to proudly declare that I don’t care, that being too old to catcall i…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 02:48 AM
5

I hate that our culture makes me miss it So she does miss it, and instead of taking adult responsibility for her own feelings, she blames society as though women's minds are so fragile that they internalize everything without a choice. Why would she want to conform to society's expectations anyway if they're as warped as she claims? If everything were as she says, her stance would be "Well, it sucks that society still doesn't value me but I'm a strong-minded, independent woman and at least they …
/r/MensRights21/07/15 02:02 AM
6

Please elaborate.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 01:19 AM
2

If that was true then why do people cover their mouth when they sneeze? Unless it's flu season and you live with children and the elderly, covering while sneezing is mostly to avoid sneezing directly on people. And rest assured, everything in your house is already covered with microscopic flecks of feces. It always will be, even if you put the lid down (it's not airtight.). You have an immune system for a reason, there's no need to worry about amounts of feces that are too small to harbor signif…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:42 AM
4

I do, however, believe (in some fields more than others; IT for example) there is an issue with women not being viewed to be as valuable in the workplace. This opinion stems from things like... Women being passed on a promotion that adds extra responsibilities to their plate because they have to have time for their families. Can you cite a source for this occurring on a systematic basis? Preferably one which excludes women who don't pursue promotions because they choose to spend time with their …
/r/MensRights08/07/15 11:15 PM
8

Excuse me, mansplainer, but social conflict theories are all the explanation we need. Statistics and economics are tools of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:45 PM
7

Ah, the ever-reliable "I know I'm right, but I don't actually have any arguments to support my position so I'm going to feign unwillingness to explain it to my stupid opponent." So many demands for societal change, so little energy to actually engage people and change minds. But even if you don't want to spend time constructing your own position, surely you could point out the glaring flaws that you obviously found in the article?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:39 PM
13

Is... is that seriously where you stopped reading? I don't believe that a literate adult could read that entire piece and retain so little from it. Here are the highlights, please try to remember that it's not as simple as "pay gap = sexism": The 23-cent gap is simply the average difference between the earnings of men and women employed "full time." What is important is the "adjusted" wage gap-the figure that controls for all the relevant variables. That is what the new AAUW study explores. . It…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:14 PM
14

Is Huffington Post a "website hosted out of some neo-con's basement"?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:57 PM
13

"Can I put my hand here?" I have cancer now.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:46 PM
3

Oberlin is such a joke, I've heard so many ridiculous stories from that school.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:41 PM
7

Facebook is full of stupid shit, there's no reason to get in a twist over this.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 11:29 PM
2

It's not inherently wrong but it's generally best for teachers not to touch students at all and coupled with the other behaviors I mentioned it is inappropriate.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 04:06 AM
1

If they were reporting on those acts, they would have called it sexual assault. "Inappropriate conduct" could be leaning in too close to help the student, touching him on the hand, keeping him after class and flirting, all sorts of things that aren't acceptable for a man or a woman but still don't merit 22 years in prison.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 02:49 AM
-3

"Inappropriate conduct" doesn't mean she fucked an 8th grader. There's a whole spectrum of things that could entail, and none of those things warrant a two-decade sentence.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 01:59 AM
11

I love that the prosecutor was far w.r.t. gender, but doing years of hard time for statutory rape of a 17-year-old is ridiculous to me. Maybe a year in jail, certainly these people should never teach again, but pubescent teenagers are not that fragile that the offender should serve a chunk of their life, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 01:02 AM
12

"Think of the children" is more effective, because it's targeted at women.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:01 PM
7

I think the important thing in this specific incident is the context. Generally it's not inherently bad to refer to groups of people by their genitals, but that's for example if you're a comedian or you're talking to your friends. It's not appropriate in professional communication, so while I love Conan's joke I think it's completely justified to criticize a representative for being crude on the job.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:58 PM
6

No no, radical organizations like NOW don't represent mainstream feminism...
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:44 PM
21

That's clearly not the issue. In context it sounds like the other comments were saying, "I wouldn't mind seeing that, he looks hot!" Whereas if a woman had her entire body restrained with duct tape, exposing only her underwear, and paraded around a campus, that in itself would be rape culture; let alone a swarm of male commenters saying, "Bring it on! She's cute!"
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:22 PM
14

Obvious troll, downvote and move along.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 07:49 PM
2

Precisely. Which is true, it's just not the sort of empowerment that makes for a free and equal society. It's framing a woman's ability to arbitrarily choose any man and garnish his wages to support her and her child as a defensible, rightful choice. If you want to reread it, take note that I excerpted those paragraphs. Take each one starting with an ellipse as making its own separate point.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 09:38 PM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:18 PM
2

...Now I can see that some men might rather welcome an end to the old-fashioned scenario whereby they find themselves held to account for the paternity of children born to girls with whom they just happen to have had sex. The actor Jude Law recently found himself in just this position, and unhesitatingly and ungallantly demanded a DNA test. By contrast, the old situation, in which women presented men with a child, and the man either did the decent thing and offered support, or made a run for it,…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:14 PM
1

From elsewhere in this thread.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:09 PM
2

I'm sorry, do you mean the countries are fucked up or the paternity tests are ineffective? You mean the countries right?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:06 PM
14

...the men of the future are going to say "don't worry dear I am on the pill" before they haul unsuspecting young maidens into bed, impregnating them and presumably disappearing into the night. ...we are in danger of losing track of the bigger issue: control of conception. The pill gives women control of the fertility tap. She decides when to turn it off but just as important she decides (after discussion we hope) when to turn it back on. ...But it is, I would suggest, quite rare for a woman who…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:03 PM
12

If there's anything more powerful than religion it's money, and the first drug company to patent a working male birth control pill is going to make a shitload of it. Men will pay out the ass to come inside a woman without a condom. It's unrealistic to think that any other interest could stop such a drug from hitting the market.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 07:49 PM
5

There's no way it's gonna scald you. S'cold, man!
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:53 AM
1

Oh god, that's a snappy comeback but imagine if your tattooist actually did something like that. The horror!
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:56 PM
0

It's a shame to see you getting downvoted for asking a perfectly legitimate question. This isn't directly concerned with men's rights, but it's a relevant submission because it showcases the type of feminism we oppose--hypersensitive, self-entitled women of privilege loudly attributing minor annoyances to male chauvinism.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:55 PM
6

I called my friend a pussy in front of my girlfriend and she got mad because it's a "gross, derogatory word". I asked her how many times she's called someone a dick and she got real quiet.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:48 PM
3

ehh, English defaults male. Let it slide.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 01:12 AM
16

Holy shit, we're not against women. We're against these women. But they're so self-centered that they'll never see that, because of course they are warriors for truth and justice.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:41 PM
30

A little bit funny but mostly sad.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 08:14 PM
7

I've been giggling at this fact for days now.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:24 PM
-6

It starts as consensual sex but half way through the video she says "Stop!" and he doesn't. From that point on it would be rape.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:04 PM
-1

a reenactment which shows just how non-rapey it was Did you watch the video? At first it was very consensual but somewhere in the middle she clearly yells "Stop!" and he ignores her.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 06:53 PM
-1

Sometimes this sub is a breath of fresh air and sometimes it's just a bunch of knee-jerk reactionism.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:47 PM
3

It's terrible advice to provoke someone like that but he's right that it's not gaslighting. Per your own definition, gaslighting is when you make someone doubt their sanity and perception of reality. Intentionally angering a violent person simply does not fit that definition.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:58 PM
2

Thanks. For anyone who wants a link, this is 20 years old but supports the figure that 8% of forcible rape reports are "unfounded", i.e. investigated and determined false (their words, this doesn't seem to include reports where no evidence can be found either way).
/r/MensRights08/05/15 11:57 PM
0

God damnit, assholes like you are discrediting the rest of us.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:20 PM
1

I've never heard 8%. Is this in reference to the fraction of accusations which are false? Can you provide a source for this?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:13 PM
1

Someone would have to define those standards if your system were to be adopted, in which case that group would become the new cabal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 02:53 AM
57

Good apology until she tries to pass the buck to Erdely in the parenthesis at the end, which negates the whole thing.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:40 PM
1

holy shit, the lack of self-awareness
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:17 PM
1

No, money is not a prerequisite to happiness. Money is the prerequisite to not starving, idiot. Not starving is the prerequisite to happiness. Your aphorism only applies to people who love subsistence farming.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:35 PM
4

You're right, but I think your parent was being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:03 PM
-12

Is this really what we're stooping to? It's annoying, but for real? This issue needed its own submission?
/r/MensRights01/04/15 09:47 PM
7

If you have an issue with the artist's other works, raise that issue instead. Don't criticize that cover where the pose was contextually appropriate for the character, and certainly don't extend that to comic books in general.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:44 AM
2

Fair enough, I agree with you and I find all these downvotes disturbing. People, if you disagree on a rational level then you have to communicate it. Silencing anything that dares to question a particular view of gender dynamics is exactly the sort of thing this sub is supposed to oppose, isn't it?
/r/MensRights15/03/15 04:48 AM
3

Are you unironically recommending Atlas Shrugged?
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:56 PM
-7

Even if it's true, and I think it's an exaggeration, the comment asserted without argument a position which is likely to resonate emotionally with many of the people on this sub. You yourself basically said, "If you felt it, you would know it's true." That's the essence of circlejerking. Even if you think the statement is correct, you should still be concerned because it's a bad habit that leads to communities adopting more and more extreme viewpoints that aren't at all connected to the real wor…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:50 PM
10

Can you elaborate on why you feel this way? To me it's obviously a snarky comment aimed at a particular, vocal kind of woman.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:34 PM
-4

Goddamnit, I like this sub. Can we please not post content from 4chan? We're already unpopular even on reddit and we don't need to give our detractors any fodder. I like 4chan too but for completely different reasons and even if the arguments in this post are valid, they should be written up as an article with proper sources for credibility.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:29 PM
1

Well we all know that every man is merely part of a sophisticated hivemind called The Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 12:51 AM
3

Uh, yeah. Your parent just explained why we can't assume everyone is perfectly rational and informed.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 12:49 AM
7

Even Elliot Rodger, who was a confirmed 100% misogynist and went on a killing spree because he hated women so much, killed more men than women.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:18 PM
9

It's a misspelling. If you had any idea how to use Google, you'd be able to follow the conveniently provided link and find 598,000 results.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:07 PM
10

"What's more important than whether it's really true or not is that it fits my notion of reality."
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:46 AM
0

Redpillers are idiots, and it bothers me that they get lumped in with us. There are some people who will always use the term "MRA" as a slur, but redpillers really aren't helping. On the other hand it sometimes seems like that's more the fault of radfem generalization, since I don't really consider TRP to be political. They're more concerned with applying their fucked-up ideology in their personal lives than with spreading it, since by definition they pursue (and think they have) an "advantage" …
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:16 AM
9

Could you please translate this to english?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 06:59 PM
-2

Can't take a goddamn joke, typical limey scum. It's a good thing we kicked you out of the union, go suck some more royal cock you fucking "wank-uh".
/r/MensRights18/02/15 10:30 PM
5

Hostility =/= persecution. Calling someone an idiot for making baseless assumptions about the universe is rude, but nobody's losing their home or life or family in America over their religion, especially not people who follow the majority religion.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:13 PM
3

Again, nobody is disagreeing with the actual content of the pictures. The point of this post is to demonstrate that women do the same thing that feminists have flamed men for doing.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:48 PM
6

-Men are held legally responsible for unplanned children even though they have no say over whether or not a fetus is carried to term (to be clear, I take issue with the first half of that statement and not the second). -Men are less likely to be awarded custody of their children after separation. -Male victims of rape are liable for child support (citing wikipedia here but you can follow the sources) -A significant proportion of domestic abuse victims are men, but the vast majority of resources …
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:28 PM
2

/r/titlegore
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:11 PM
8

Holy shit, I don't understand the amount of hatred you can get just for saying you support men's issues. Being pro-men has nothing to do with being anti-women, and the fact that your teachers have jumped to that conclusion is highly disturbing. There's plenty of room in equality for both men and women to get attention, but the backlash against the very concept of men's rights demonstrates our legitimacy here.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 01:29 AM
9

"both" lol in what universe
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:11 PM
2

It's not just Emma Sulkowicz who falsely accused him but the two others as well, as encouraged by the Alpha Delta Phi co-ed fraternity's officer! I've read a few articles about this case but I haven't heard this before. Can you give me a source to look into? Is it known for a fact that the accusations are false or do we just have the (pretty damning, but still circumstantial) evidence from the text messages?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:05 PM
-6

Wow, so now you're saying you want your daughter to have >1/4 chance of getting cancer? Fuck you, shitlord! This is why we need feminism.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:01 PM
4

"A lot of us feel like it's not even really fair that men should get to vote, considering they could be 72 and, with a little Viagra, have another baby," says Vicki Iovine, author of The Girlfriends' Guide to Pregnancy. "For us women, it's really a limited window. Holy shit. We know that boys who grow up to become men don't necessarily want to be men. They like to be boys. You're only a real man if you want to be a father? Holy shit. And so women say, 'You know what? He's gonna just have to snap…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:43 AM
5

released kek with a boatload of compensation top kek
/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:48 PM
6

Besides that, pregnancy and childbirth can have complications (even things like stretch marks that don't pose any risk) so it's not fair to force someone through that. It doesn't sit well with me that men have no say in the matter, but realistically there's no alternative that isn't even more unjust since women also have their bodies on the line.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 01:23 AM
5

I think the point is that those feminists are out of touch with reality, and we don't want to be like them. "This bad thing which happened to a woman probably wouldn't have happened to a man, see how society is sexist" is self-serving conjecture and we don't want to emulate it just because they seem to get away with it.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:27 AM
2

These are all great points, I just don't think "free speech" is the appropriate term when talking about actions in the private domain.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:09 AM
-7

This is a petition to drop a columnist, not enact a law against free speech. edit- really?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:51 PM
8

You're mistaken. The impulse at the top of the list is clearly to rape women, as we can see here. Even an 8-year-old boy intuitively knows how to molest an innocent teenage girl.
/r/PussyPass17/07/14 10:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter