TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Riecth Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by Riecth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." "unreasonable"
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/15 07:22 PM
3

Women have the right to vote same as men. There's also more women than men. If women wanted more female politicians they could vote for them, same as anyone.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:55 PM
-1

The was a shit post. 0/10 see me after class.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:53 PM
0

Well there is this article from the other day that, simply put, says men earn more in nursing because they try harder. http://nursinglink.monster.com/benefits/articles/11915-are-male-nurses-paid-more
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:03 PM
0

That's a pretty terrible quote.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:29 PM
1

The irony here, fantastic.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 07:27 PM
1

TL;DR: Con man cons a bunch of people and accuses an Australian NRL player of sexual assault. Player found innocent, con man still conning.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 04:05 PM
2

It must be due to my host file settings. Ah well, that is plain wrong.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:19 AM
7

My google may be different than the rest of yours; mine comes up with: the unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse. What am I missing?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 06:25 PM
2

The Fair Pay Act prohibits wage discrimination based on sex, race, or national origin among employees for work in "equivalent jobs. This means that I can not sue under this act as I am the same sex, race, and national origin. Edit: Additionally, employers are allowed to pay equivalent jobs differently if the disparity is proven to be a result of a seniority or merit system, or a system that measures pay by the quantity or quality of work. This would also prohibit any such action on my part under…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 07:08 PM
1

And promptly get told no. My options as a male with a male employer are to ask for a wage and be given that wage or not be given that wage. If I am not given that wage I can accept it or quit. If I was a woman in Israel I could sue to have my pay increased. Seems legit.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:29 PM
5

So the woman asked for a salary at 70% that of a coworker and got it... and this some how is not justification enough. My brain just broke. I guess I should be making as much as my boss. It's not my fault I didn't ask for his salary when I started right?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:03 PM
2

If someone comes at me with a stated intent to harm, maim, or kill, there is no such thing a too violent. An aggressor's life and well being means absolutely shit to me.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 10:17 PM
6

Put more plainly; People do good, men do bad.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:53 PM
2

And that would be a point on contention. Women and children blow themselves up in the middle east. This isn't something that's up for debate. They may or may not be leaders but they still could have been terrorists. The problem is that feminism instills this idea that women nor children could be anything but victims while men could be victims but probably not. In this rampage it appears everyone was a victim. Yet the article still intentionally mentions women and children while omitting any dire…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:55 PM
4

I believe the offense is being taken at the slant that women and children being dead is worse than men, women, and children being dead.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:50 PM
-1

I'm going to go out on a short limb here and say you're either trolling and have poor comprehension skills. In either event, welcome to the male reality. There is no patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:53 PM
3

"A bruised arm" is all that was "reported" as a result of this argument. A very likely scenario in which this might happen is one party beginning to storm away and the other grabs their arm. In the heat of an argument the grip may have been more than intended but most likely was not the result of some assault. If we're going to say that any physical interaction between people that results in minor bruising is assault we may as well cancel all sports. It also appears that the wife told a friend a…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:19 PM
6

This is the study that was widely debunked due to several biases on the part of the experimenter and lack of controls. Circumcision has previously been shown to have no reduction in HIV risk. [1] [2] HIV infection rate still increases in the face of mass circumcision and said circumcisions may be directly responsible for the spread of HIV because men are being told if they get cut they can't catch the disease and are therefore not using condoms and getting/spreading the infection. [3]
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:22 PM
1

Source
/r/MensRights16/12/11 03:30 PM
4

led to two anonymous student complaints Anonymous? Fuck this.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 10:09 PM
2

Every time I see a phrase like this I can't help but think of Kurt Vonnegut's short story Harrison Bergeron. Summary of the summary: forced equality is the worst idea ever.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:12 PM
1

This makes me physically ill.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 10:56 PM
6

The thing is they actually believe that there is a male conspiracy to keep women and children down. That the patriarchy convenes in secret meetings to plot the oppression of women and children. They will never acknowledge that the majority of homeless are male.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 06:52 PM
2

Yes... and you are wrong!
/r/MensRights11/11/11 04:22 PM
6

This part In an age when having a university degree matters more than ever, large numbers have gone AWOL from higher education. Even the ones who have degrees face higher unemployment than women do, coupled with this part from War Against Boys Continues Apace in Academia Girls began to be favored in college admissions, and overtook boys by the 1990s. The reasons for this are not at all mysterious; there was a concerted effort to give girls an advantage, and it worked. The hand-wringing over “pro…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:26 PM
1

I know. I was never arguing for circumcision.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 05:16 PM
1

SPONTANEOUS GANGRENE! Chop off your arms now before it's too late!
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:48 PM
-1

True facts. I only state appendix explicitly as it can kill you unprovoked, while an arm or leg is far far less likely to do so.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:55 PM
1

If this was a divorce this is the type of logic I would like applied to the situation. An evaluation of who contributed what financially and property dispensed proportionately. However this is a case of joint property ownership. No different than if my brother and I bought a property and then only one of us paid the mortgage but the other wanted half the property's worth. I expect there's already laws in place for this scenario.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:55 PM
-1

Just like an appendix.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 08:58 PM
6

What I think and what the facts are may, as a point of fact, not be the same. That being said the women we given a gag order by the court when they accepted the settlement. If we go digging in to this story they will be unable to defend themselves from any accusations per court order. Additionally Cain's camp felt their claims had enough merit to not fight them in court. Your demand for action would have been better served prior to settlement. The only real course of action available to us here …
/r/MensRights04/11/11 06:20 PM
4

I wouldn't settle. I would raise awareness as much as possible and fight it in court and sue for defamation. All that said, Cain was accused and settled. That's the whole story. What would you like us to do about these facts?
/r/MensRights04/11/11 06:05 PM
3

Yep, that is most likely what happened. Last year.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 05:57 PM
6

The 'story' is repeating one year old public records. The 'story' is Cain was accused and settled. That's all the meat in the entire story. There's nothing to do here as it is not one year ago when the accusations were leveled.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 05:52 PM
9

Cain was accused of harassment, settled out of court, and this information has been made available to the public. The media sensationalized it because Cain is the frontrunner for a major political party and for profit. There's no need to get involved in this story as there is no story.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 05:46 PM
0

Prove to me that the mother did not fully believe she would end up in a shallow grave if she intervened. Don't worry, I know you can't. Because we don't have all of the information. But please continue to make snap judgments. I'm sure you're exactly what a prosecutor is looking for during jury selection.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 10:15 PM
0

Once more, for the record books, we need more information.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 06:00 PM
0

There is exactly zero evidence that the mother isn't a victim of abuse at the hands of her husband. Once more, for the record books, we need more information. We can not condemn on speculation alone. This must be investigated and go before a court to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. It is our responsibility as people working for equal rights not to presume guilt of gender. The man may be the sole aggressor, or not. We do not know.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 05:06 PM
0

Please do not lie about my words when they are directly above yours. You appear to have a preconceived and naive notion that their is no such thing as emotional abuse. As I stated extremely plainly, if the mother is a abuser she deserves equal punishment. Her own daughter does not view her as an abuser. This is something that must be determined by a court of law. Why is it so hard for you to accept that the possibility exists that there are people who use their authority to abuse and manipulate?…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 04:56 PM
0

While I agree with the spirit of your post I have to disagree with your premise. In the video it appears the wife takes the belt in order to reduce the abuse to the daughter as she strikes less frequently and with far less force. Abusers are capable of convincing their victims that the sky is green and shit is their favorite food in a matter of months. These women were allegedly abused for years. I don't know the true circumstances of this family's abuse or lack thereof. All I do know is that th…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 04:23 PM
1

What a terrible point of view. I hope your opinion is downvoted below threshold very quickly so no else is forced to read such abhorrent speech.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 04:12 PM
8

Murdoch paper, nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:02 PM
1

I went ahead and shared my opinion there, which incidentally is the same as yours.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 11:41 PM
2

There are people who commit atrocities against the public so devoid of humanity that no amount of punishment or rehabilitation will ever make them regret or repent for their actions, no matter how heinous. Keeping those people alive and part of society even as a caged amusement kept hidden from society is a slight against the entire human race. Those types of people deserve nothing short of death. But only those people.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 09:21 PM
3

It wasn’t the whims of fate that destroyed Collingham’s life. A woman hacked into two email accounts, created a fraudulent correspondence, gave false information to three police services, and committed perjury. A police officer bullied false testimony out of a teenager. Then, relying on flimsy evidence, a police service publicized the most vile charge that can be levelled against a man. No charges have been laid against BA’s mother for her crimes. Durham police told Collingham they refused to in…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 12:11 AM
3

That's just fucked...
/r/MensRights22/09/11 08:05 PM
1

The double standard has been around since forever. No one has ever cared about the current female bias until relatively recently.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 08:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter