TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RimePaw Archive

View 0 posts and 5 comments by RimePaw on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nor does it take into account the fact that female rulers were more likely to be seen as weak Or that their society was still very patriarchal. Sure there were Queens, but not entire governments of women. The church and religion also encouraged wars, again, head authority being men.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:58 PM
0

"if women ruled the world there'd be no war women who rule still start more wars comparitively. Well, women still haven't "ruled the world". Those Queens were ruling under their patriarchal system.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:56 PM
1

Their society is still patriarchal. For example, America suddenly isn't a matriarchy if Harris is elected because our global political sphere is still male preferred/dominated. Patriarchal ideologies still reign. Not to mention religious fueled conflict, and we know men had authority in church too over women.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:54 PM
-19

A woman is obliged to be happy and nothing else. Wonder why countries are scrambling to keep their populations up. Who gives birth to the workers and soldiers again?
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:33 PM
1

Men and women’ is not dehumanizing. ‘Men and females’ is dehumanizing. Yes. OP cracks it up to "reddit hivemind" without doing basic research into sexism and language. ‘Person with a uterus’ has ‘person’ right there, so no, it’s not dehumanizing. Exactly it literally has person in the phrase. The only issue with this one is it's context specific and excludes women without uterus, but it works if it makes sense in context
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter