TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rivka333 Archive

View 1 posts and 51 comments by Rivka333 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Rivka333/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, what they were saying is that SOME women will have sex for those things, and those are the only sorts of women Tate can attract.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 04:40 PM
2

Umm...pretty much anybody including any feminist would agree with calling 911 for a man dying on the side of the road after a car accident. B. They use a moral argument, "well its wrong to let someone die." Yeah. That is the basic reason for calling 911 for someone. When they say B, a very interesting opportunity presents itself...you can then ask "o, so you'd do that for me? Yes. Most of them would. a man who cant afford medical treatment die from cancer?" That's not a feminist thing, that's a …
/r/MensRights05/06/16 07:10 PM
1

we should not be forced to wear sanitary products during our period. That...is...the oddest thing I've heard all day. Yeah, no one's forcing us. Most people simply don't like bleeding all through our clothes. Yuck.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 02:39 AM
1

Because it's easy to only care about one's own group, while trampling over others, and it's important not to.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 02:37 AM
1

Her response to being told that I had evidence disproving her was to close her eyes and scream louder....She later went on to threaten a false rape claim against me if I didn't buy her alcohol... Some people...are a little bit crazy.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 02:35 AM
2

"Shit" has more to do with intrinsic essence. "Shitty" has more to do with actions and character. (I'm studying Aquinas's metaphysics, so it comes naturally to make those kinds of distinctions.)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 12:53 AM
0

male hamster I love that metaphor.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 12:02 AM
3

Most men that swallowed the pill know that humans are shit women are humans therefore women are shit too. ...that actually seems to be true. That seems to be their philosophy, I mean. (I don't actually think humans are shit. I think humans are shitty, yes, but not that they are shit. There's a difference). They despise women, but they seem to have a pretty low (though it's less explicit) view of men also.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 12:00 AM
19

I never got up in the middle of the night for any of my kids and I don't regret it even a little. For my twins, I wore fucking earplugs. I had to work and support the family. She did jack shit all day. Let her get up at 2 am If you were working, and she was staying at home, it made perfect sense for her to be the one to get up in the middle of the night. But that doesn't mean she did "jack shit" all day. Raising children is not "jack shit", and there are professional jobs that consist of child c…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 10:00 PM
1

So...OP posts a link to an article about a shelter that people opened for men in order to state that people saying men need shelters should open such shelters but that they don't do so because they don't actually care about male-shelters, and don't want to open one themselves, they just want to say that in order to derail conversations. Despite the fact that some of them clearly did just open up a male shelter. The workings of OP(not our OP, the linked OP)'s mind make no sense.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:59 PM
13

This reminds me of a woman I saw on an episode of Bridezillas. Her fiancee danced with some girls during his Bachelor's party, and she considered it cheating. She ordered a wedding cake shaped like a penis in order to humiliate him, as punishment. (Later changed the order). She was also physically abusive. In short, she reminded me of my ex-boss. (I'm female, if it makes a difference. Not all of us are think this is ok-at least I don't).
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:55 PM
3

What I think when I see an image like that (even though it's a jerk.) Crazy person, stay away. If in relationship, end relationship immediately.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:51 PM
1

No idea what you're talking about or how it's relevant to this article.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 03:35 PM
1

If I were the adoptive parents-there's no way I would keep the baby if discovering that there was a situation like this. (Yes, it would hurt to give the baby back. But keeping it would be simply wrong. As a professional Infant/Toddler caregiver, I already know the pain of saying goodbye to an infant after growing attached.)
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:38 AM
2

As a woman...it is really scary to think that a guy whom I don't think did anything wrong could suffer because of other people insisting he raped me. Wow. And even in the case of real rape victims, they should be the ones to choose whether to press charges/accuse/etc. Forcing them to do so, (from what I've heard from actual rape victims) is itself traumatic to them.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 05:21 AM
1

Because every action we take should simultaneously solve every problem in the world.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 05:11 AM
1

10 yrs is too long for animal cruelty. 50 yrs is beyond outrageous! It's for the protection of society. They did that to animals-humans could easily be next. Yes, humans are worth more. And if they'd done the same to humans, their punishment would have been longer or death penalty. Anyway, just because innocent humans are worth more than innocent animals doesn't mean that animals are worthless. The outrageous part is that she only got 10 years (though that could be because of cooperation, but ev…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:49 AM
1

Dogs are trained to behave a certain way. The loyalty of dogs is not trained-it's pretty inborn. That being said, while dogs are better than those humans who choose to act in terrible ways, I agree that they're not better than humans who live good or at least neutral lives (most humans).
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:47 AM
0

People are and can be bastards with zero loyalty. Some people are, some aren't. Dogs on the other hand love their people even if their people treat them like shit. Usually true. From a simple "goodness" perspective dogs are arguably better than people People are not all the same.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:45 AM
1

Because we are sentient and animals are not You don't know what the word "sentient" means. Sentient means having senses, having perception, having the basic kind of thought that accompanies that. Humans are "rational animals" we have a capacity for a higher level of thought. But both we and they are sentient. Read some Aristotle. No one before Descartes thought that animals weren't sentient, and after him, no scientist thinks so (except for those who think that no being is sentient at all).
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:44 AM
1

regardless, another dog isnt capable of torturing another being simply for pleasure. Most humans don't torture another being simply for pleasure, even though they're capable of it. Those who do, maybe they've lowered themself below dogs. But most humans don't do that.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:42 AM
1

This is joked about a ton, but I believe dogs and cats and chickens are above humans. Humans do some sick shit, dogs arent capable of that sort of fucked shit. Perhaps they are above those humans who do that kind of stuff. I wouldn't say that they're above innocent humans.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:41 AM
1

Do you really think the life of a dog, cat, or chicken is equal to that of a human's? Come on.. You don't have to think that the life of an animal is equal to that of a human in order to think that such a life has enough value that someone who needlessly tortures and needlesssly kills such an animal should receive a harsh punishment. Anyway, it's for the safety of humans in society for both these persons to be put away for as long as possible. Regardless of the difference in objective value betw…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:40 AM
8

In Ireland, a Roma/gypsy girl was taken from her family by the police because she looked different from them. Her parents were dark and she was blond/pale. Eventually she was returned after DNA testing showed that she was actually their daughter.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:28 AM
1

Only 18 years?
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:36 AM
1

It shouldn't be about assuming guilt or, on the other side, automatic dismissal. It should be about evidence. Actual evidence presented to the criminal justice system to determine reasonable doubt. If you can't accept that simple premise of "innocent until proven guilty", THE staple of the United States justice system, then you are damned to repeat the barbaric mistakes of unjust societies. It's really that simple. This.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:34 AM
2

like the idea that being nice in and of itself is not sexually attractive, I find niceness sexually attractive when it's part of a personality that's already sexually attractive in other ways. In isolation, if the person isn't also interesting/attractive in other ways, then niceness isn't enough. I mean, niceness is nice (couldn't resist that, sorry) I've known 87 year olds who were the nicest people on earth, I loved them platonically-no way I was attracted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 01:04 AM
1

I find that Pasteur's creation of the vaccine to be far more of a meaningful contribution to Mankind than someone else having children. Although two parents had to have Pasteur. Two parents brought Caesar into the world. I'm not saying that everyone has to have children---but everyone that exists is here because someone did have children.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 12:55 AM
0

What type of women aren't interested in someone who's confident, interesting, and in good shape? That's probably not what he/she meant by "TRP tactics." Everybody already knows that people are more interested in people who are confident, interesting, and in good shape. It's not some unique insight, exclusive to TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 12:41 AM
1

You misunderstood entirely. Actually...what he did was to exaggerate.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 12:36 AM
2

I love this post. While it is possible to make generalizations...one must have the good judgment to know when to put those aside in regards to particular persons. BTW, I never cry in front of other people-but if I do, I want space-and I will distance myself to find that space on my own.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 12:32 AM
1

Yeah, I guess my comment was worded badly but it's too late at night for me to find the mental energy to fix it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 06:29 AM
1

later in life non-sexual love doesn't even matter if you don't have the sexual kind. It is true that without a (sexual relationship) as you get older you lose your chances even for the platonic loves. For instance, I mentioned the love between parent and child. Well, without a romantic partner, you're unlikely to have kids of your own. And, as you said, friends are immersed in their own lives. So, I partially agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 06:28 AM
1

Well...her comment was vague enough that we don't know what actually happened. A simple human connection, attention and affection are not enough. It sounded to me like she was saying that there wasn't even that. But as I said, we don't really know what happened. Was it just one guy, or many? Was he truly verbally cruel, or was he simply awkward at showing interest, or was he simply uninterested (he had no obligation to be interested-just like we women have no obligation to be interested in a par…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 06:25 AM
1

Agreed. The knowledge that in philosophically everything is good is a too abstract to substitute for actual concrete love from another specific human being in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 06:19 AM
2

a lack of interest but at the same time, a lack of interest is not a turn off when the guy is attractive Yes...attractive people can get away with more. Doesn't mean a lack of interest is an effective thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 05:42 AM
1

You don't believe in non-sexual love? Not even between parents and children? Not between friends? Of course if you can't find a girlfriend or even just an ONS, nobody loves you. If you do have a girlfriend or a ONS that would be the only person in the world who loves you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 05:39 AM
1

he doesn't look as good as you SOunded like she was saying he and she looked equally good. he doesn't act as good as you That's her complaint. but you were still attracted to him? Perhaps. Or...perhaps not attracted yet, but trying to get to know him in the chance that he would turn out to be attractive, personality wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 05:37 AM
1

Which is impossible to due when you are unlovable. I have scoured the internet AND printed media looking for a way to just love and accept myself without needing any sort of external validation, but there is nothing. People like you simply can't fathom that someone can exist literally without any external validation. You think I'm exaggerating and the reality is not as I describe it. It is. I don't think anybody is objectively unloveable. (philosophy student specializing in Aquinas: i think that…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 05:24 AM
1

Yep. I agree with all your points in regards to that case.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 07:46 PM
1

Yes, we're basically in agreement. I didn't mean that she actually took away their agency in their lives...Lying about someone is taking away their agency about how they choose to be represented.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:36 PM
1

Well, here is a case, since you asked. But don't misunderstand, I do agree about the double standard. As seen by the fact that even this link just had to include a line about how "this is atypical for a female." http://fox4kc.com/2015/05/17/woman-convicted-of-breaking-into-apartment-raping-man-headed-to-prison/ I think an even more chilling example of the double standard is how some people will hear about a woman raping or abusing a man, and they might even agree that it is rape or abuse, and th…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:27 PM
1

She doesn't want to let women who've gone through whatever decide for themselves how to classify it. It doesn't help women if you take away all agency from them by forcing them into victim status. Rape is imposing your body on someone else's body, Koss wants to impose her mind on everyone else's mind.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:22 PM
1

Amen. Best comment.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:06 AM
1

Rape is when someone is forced into sex that they did not consent to. It's not a hard concept to grasp. The odd thing is...part of her argument seems to be that (according to her) men who were raped by envelopment not suffer as much as women who were raped by penetration. If this is a real argument against it being rape... wouldn't it mean that if a raped women didn't suffer as much as other raped women, she wasn't actually raped?
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:33 AM
5

"All else being equal, rape by penetration of a woman may be worse, on average, then rape by envelopment." I'm not sure how one could make that kind of judgment?
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:32 AM
1

The wording of the law could actually be interpreted either way.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:30 AM
10

I've heard that lesbian rape is usually not taken seriously. There was a really heartbreaking thread elsewhere on Reddit about it. The poster was at a party when it happened, and the hostess called it "girl drama."
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:29 AM
1

The current USA legal definition has a wording that is quite weird and could be interpreted either way.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:28 AM
2

Exactly. Doesn't the science of embryonic development teach us that the clitoris and the penis are basically the same part of the body, in two different degrees of development?
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:27 AM
14

Not all feminists are like her. But for those who are, there are no excuses.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter