TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rizzopizzo Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by Rizzopizzo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Every anthropologist in the world agreed that as soon as we had resources, we stopped be egalitarian. No. The word you're looking for is "surplus". Good God man at least read the books! Based on that answer, which is "natural" for the state we are in currently? We can only observe trends. So "natural" isn't the right word. "Dominant" works though. But if you assume that only hierarchical dominant arrangements make sense, you are engaging in the "only game in town fallacy." I don't expect you to …
/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:01 AM
1

lol cooking or BBQ has nothing to do with I was arguing, you little simp.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:56 AM
1

Straight people have raised so many fucked up kids, we should take the precautionary principle and sterilize every human being and have no more children ever. Believe it or not there's actually a whole school in philosophy devoted to this idea. It's called anti-natalism. Though the idea isn't that "straight parents raise bad children," it's just that there is theoretically more pain in life than pleasure. I disagree, personally -- not on the subject of pain and pleasure -- but the subject of the…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:30 AM
1

You haven't even learned how to read. For example you still claim that hierarchy is the "natural" order of affairs, even though every single anthropologist in the world disagrees with you.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:19 AM
1

That's a lame response. I debunked your arguments, you should adjust your position. But you're too proud to admit that you got completely owned. I don't mean to be cruel. Honestly, I think you should read a few books. Because right now you look like an imbecile. A complete, and utter, moron. It doesn't take much. A child who goes to the library!
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:02 PM
1

Are you suggesting that men and women are different? That could get you banned from some companies...
/r/MensRights01/09/17 08:17 PM
0

You sound like a fucking weirdo. Good luck with your various psychological problems. I say that honestly: I hope you are able to overcome your difficulties.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 08:15 PM
1

Your entire argument about how egalitarianism is a "natural urge on par with mating itself" only exists when humanity is barely scraping by That is clearly false. The US, for example, contains the fourth largest wealth inequality in the world; and there is constant agitation. I mean how dumb would you have to be to suggest that such extreme wealth inequality would produce a contented society? I mean that's just completely, utterly moronic. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 08:06 PM
2

"persecute" No I don't think anyone should be "persecuted." Grandmothers should do as they used to do, and warn young women about bad boys and cads. Feminists should tell young women that they won't achieve happiness by fucking endless streams of young men. Women should be honest, especially toward their children. The studies are in; the case is made. The "patriarchal" family wasn't just about "oppression"; it turns out that it was helpful to the children, the father, and even the mother. YOU --…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:58 PM
3

Women should be held accountable for their decisions, just like men. I don't think that's gonna happen any time soon, but the sooner it happens, the more happy healthy children in the world.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:36 PM
3

Noooooo, you think?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:31 PM
2

Well make a fucking policy already and stop grand-standing.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:29 PM
0

it's always preferable to be born into the privileged class (female) Well, I can't disagree with that. Thinking about it, I could have been happy born as a female. Not unless you're already "gender-fluid". I accept the oppression of males but I'm still fucking happy to have been born male. Am I crazy? Maybe so. But I love being a fucking Man.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:25 PM
5

I only "judge" women insofar as they should be judged. We all recognize that men can be irresponsible assholes. It's about time we did the same for women.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:45 PM
7

And I seriously wonder what should be done with "bad boys" Well, if you're serious about the problem -- and it is indeed a problem -- the only way of putting an end to is to encourage women not to fuck them.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:18 PM
-1

No. But there is such a thing as ying and yang. It's not true that males are invariably treated worse than females in every circumstance. Let me ask you a question: would you have preferred to be born female, rather than male? I thought so.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:15 PM
3

This is why you should read books before spouting off. Chiefdoms arose when certain tribes found food surplus and decided to stay. The classic example is the Haida Gwaii in British Columbia. So much fish. So little time. A hierarchy quickly formed, and they brutalized their neighbors. They also created what is arguably the world's greatest art. The Haida are NOT an example of a hunter-gatherer band. For 99 percent of our history we lived as nomadic foragers: the males hunted, the women gathered,…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:12 PM
7

Single mothers are neither heroes nor villains Alternatively, they can be heroes or villains. Sometimes both. The raw, UN-PC truth is that single mothers are horrible for a society. This does not mean that single mothers should be condemned. It DOES mean that women need to be made aware that males are essential for child rearing. So shouldn't they be sterilized? WTF? Women can instill morality and values too. Indeed they can and do. I'm just talking about general trends. The role of the mother i…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:46 PM
1

Depends on the definition. I mean there are philosophers who have argued that we should literally stop breeding (antinatalism) because life is so fucking unfair. And it is. Antinatalism, or anti-natalism, is a philosophical position that assigns a negative value to birth. The term "antinatalism" is in opposition to the term "natalism" or "pro-natalism". Antinatalists argue that people should refrain from procreation because it is immoral. In scholarly and in literary writings, various ethical fo…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:29 PM
1

Yeah but that's just a fact of life. Of course it will always be women and children first. But at the same time it's theoretically possible to create a society where we don't need to choose between men and women. And in fact, hunter-gatherer bands were quite patriarchal. Look at the Inuit for an extreme example.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:14 PM
3

Switzerland regularly holds "referendums" in which the entire population gets to vote on a potential policy. Switzerland also embraces a decentralized/federated model, which was perfected by the Iroquois. It's complicated by the huge wealth inequalities: so rich people get to spend about a thousand times more on advertising than poor people. But it's the closest Western societies have come to democracy imo.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:13 PM
4

What does it matter why they are single? It matters a great deal. Exhibit A: woman fucks "bad boy" drug dealer, he bails, she's stuck with a kid. That's her fault. She could have chosen the "nice guy" working hard who's a little less sexy but is a decent person. Exhibit B: woman's husband dies in a car accident. In the latter case the woman is indeed a "hero", and deserves society's support. I thought your main concern is giving boys male role models. It's not just about boys. Studies -- thousan…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:04 PM
1

Well I think above all human beings are adaptable. So we can adapt to despotic societies. But that doesn't erase the underlying urge toward equality, and despotic societies are invariably short-lived. Our species has been egalitarian for 99 percent of our history. Every single anthropologist agrees. So even in the most tyrannical societies you find groups of men trying to overthrow their rulers. As for men and women -- I think you are essentially correct. Women come before men. But if you look a…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:55 PM
4

Switzerland is probably the most egalitarian country in the world since it embraces direct democracy. In terms of gender equality -- this is actually a much more difficult question than it seems. For example, one could argue that Saudi Arabia is more gender equal than the West since both men and women get a raw deal. In the West, all of the burdens are placed on men.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:49 PM
5

wrong, wrong, wrong Human beings are extremely egalitarian. We have a competing impulse toward hierarchy and violence and despotism but that doesn't erase the underlying tendency. I would go so far as to argue that the very reason for our success is the male tendency in homo sapiens to cooperate. Nevertheless it's certainly true that our instincts also make us ridiculously biased toward keeping the females of the tribe alive. This leads to the absurdity of both males and females obsessing over t…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:44 PM
7

Equality is impossible. But egalitarianism is a human urge on par with the mating instinct itself. It's what separates us from the beasts. When men created weapons, the alpha male was dethroned. What accounts for the difference between primate bands and hunter-gatherer egalitarians? The absence of a disposition for dominance? Not likely. In Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior, anthropologist Christopher Boehm argues that we share with chimpanzees and bonobos a tendency…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:33 PM
-1

What about male children raised by one female relative (mother, grandmother, sister, aunt)? Or in a predominantly female environment? I acknowledged that by saying "and the reverse." Lots of single women (usually widows) raised boys successfully. But these boys had other male role models. Masculinity was embraced, not shunned. Nowadays there is no one rigid model of masculinity. I'm not trying to knock on single mothers. Again, I stated that some single mothers are single through no fault of the…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:17 PM
4

Great post and I entirely agree. Look, I'm not saying that gays and lesbians shouldn't raise children. I'm just saying we need to be mindful of what we're dealing with here. Clearly, we have grossly underestimated the importance of fathers, for one. The situation in schools is just bizarre. Honestly if I had a son I wouldn't send him into that female viper pit known as "public school."
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:15 PM
11

We all like to make fun of ol' Clemmy. She's an extremely unattractive woman who hates men. She's like a walking caricature of feminism. Yet some irresponsible asshole impregnated this beast. She recently gave birth to a baby....wait for it...BOY. (cue music from The Omen). I highly doubt that Clem believes even half of what she writes. She's happy to cash her checks by denigrating men and boys. Her shtick is to say something like "men should all be burned alive" then pretend she is suffering PT…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:00 PM
10

"It will be totalitarianism beyond anything Hitler or Stalin achieved when criticism is redefined as coercion and coercion is redefined as protection from criticism. Radical feminism can hardly hope to come to power, or maintain it, under any other circumstances." - Bob Black, Feminism as Fascism, 1982
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:41 PM
8

I quoted Chomsky above. Is Chomsky "alt-right"? This IS a men's rights issue, because mild-mannered MRA's are routinely lumped in with Nazi douche bags. I'm a radical leftist on most issues, but if I state my opinion on men's rights I'm likely to be banned from most quasi "leftist" subs on Reddit.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:39 PM
3

Indeed.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:13 PM
-15

Were you raised by lesbians? Perhaps you should listen to the "lived experiences" of those who were.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:52 PM
19

Paul Nathanson, who is perhaps the most important academic working on men's issues and misandry, does not believe that gays and lesbians should adopt children. Nathanson is gay. His argument is that the single mother experiment has been so catastrophic to society that we should embrace the precautionary principle: The precautionary principle (or precautionary approach) to risk management states that if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public, or to the environment,…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:46 PM
74

“Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re really in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech.” - Chomsky
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:28 PM
2

If you want to shame men who are cut, then carry on. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:25 AM
2

Golding lived before feminist propaganda was even a thing.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:27 AM
3

I'm sorry to to say that you will be probably be disappointed. The female "Lord of the Flies" is destined to create a fictional utopia; the original work wasn't really gender oriented at all; it was a parable about fear producing atrocity (fear was represented by the "beast"; the pig's head became an object of fear and then violence) No such lofty ideas are present in feminism. Feminism is dumbed down bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:11 AM
4

I have no idea what you're getting at. Try to be more specific.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:57 AM
5

What a bizarre essay. It may as well have been written by a paranoid schizophrenic, for all the logic it entails. At the end of the day, feminists will twist themselves into pretzels to avoid responsibility and accountability, aka adulthood. They want to remain as perpetual children while having the rights of adults. Sorry, but this arrangement will not last. Women either need to step and up accept the responsibilities of adulthood, or they need to state loudly that they don't want these respons…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:46 AM
16

Women don't need to be drunk, they lack agency even when they're sober. How else to explain why feminists are trying to abolish female prisons?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:33 AM
3

Dude, you got pwned. Suck it up and move on.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:30 AM
1

Cunt.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:27 AM
2

I tried identifying as a fetus but it got me absolutely nowhere. In fact people wanted to kill me!
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:25 AM
5

Noooo, women being so fussy that most men aren't even in the running has nothing to do with men's rights. Indeed.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:17 AM
6

That when a man beats on another man, a woman beats on another woman, It's called the "Duluth" model and was created by feminists. It marginalizes gay and lesbian victims of DV in order to demonize males. Duluth is essentially a grand conspiracy theory; in reality women are more likely to abuse their partners, and lesbians have the highest rate of IPV.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:06 AM
5

Let this be a lesson to you: read the papers first.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:03 AM
-2

I keep hearing rumors that this woman is going to do something positive. Well do it already or put a man in charge.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:54 AM
0

Agree with you about the term "anarchy". It derives from the Ancient Greek Anarkos "without ruler." Only pathetic simps disparage anarchy. As for girls on an island, well I'm sorry to say they probably wouldn't survive more than a week or two unless they were taught survival skills from infancy. So there wouldn't be much "violence" -- everyone would be dead. The painful truth is that females need males to survive. No one wants to admit it but there it is.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:48 AM
6

Yeah, I have a hard time believing a group of girls would turn on each other and descend into anarchy the way a group of boys would. lol what? Go watch the Dutch "survivor" episode. You have it exactly backwards: the men cooperated, the women whined and competed and weren't able to accomplish a single thing. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:43 AM
9

What does the man get out of it? If she repeats that bogus stat you know she's a feminist and run for the hills.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:35 AM
7

Nevermind the feminist weirdo. Keep posting updates :)
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:33 AM
3

He or she suggested that his fifteen year old daughter could easily debunk most of the nonsense/man-hating garbage taught in "gender studies." He or she is right. In fact a five-year-old who understands basic logic could easily refute your average feminist.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:29 AM
4

the Marxist feminists, who had been there from the very beginning of the Second Wave, were taking over the movement. Lol. They were funded by the Ford and Rockefeller foundations -- the great capitalists. The same people funding second wave feminism were funding right wing libertarianism. Urging deregulation of corporations etc. Allan Greenspan and Ayn Rand. It's all a big fucking joke.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:24 AM
2

Horrible man-hating biatch. No different than a Klansman during the 1920's. What's more to say?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:22 AM
21

This has nothing to do with mens rights. Keep it on R/incels.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:21 AM
2

The fact that only half of Canadian judges and lawyers realize the system is stacked against men is ten times more disturbing...
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:18 AM
39

Well gee whiz, good thing you came along to point that out, otherwise the police would have automatically blamed the mother with no evidence. Good for you, white knight!
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:58 PM
23

find the nearest available man and see if you can pin it on him. That's surely an exaggeration. In all seriousness, YES, women can be just as psycho and harmful as men. The fact that feminists refused to recognize this is proof positive that their movement is about supremacy, not "equality."
/r/MensRights31/08/17 09:53 PM
5

You're simply not being honest with yourself. That is all.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 09:10 PM
0

Fag.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 09:09 PM
4

Like I said...
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:41 PM
16

The UN has a "gender inequality" index. Imagine my shock when I realized they only charted areas in which females were supposedly disadvantaged. In fact discrimination against men -- up to and including death -- is actually viewed as a positive. Case in point: Rwanda came out at the top of the "equality" index after the genocide. Why? Because most of the men and boys were dead!
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:36 PM
6

And yet it was a conservative school administrator in the US that made every boy stand up during a ceremony and pledge they would never hit a woman. No demand was made of the girls that they would never hit a man. If you think this is merely a "liberal" problem you're out to lunch.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:34 PM
3

If feminism continues to "succeed", society will collapse and there will be no films, short or otherwise. If the MRM succeeds, it will one day be recognized as the heroic civil rights movement it is. The problem with the MRM is that -- unlike feminism -- it demands that people truly challenge gender roles. We are asking that women take responsibility for their actions and that men receive a certain degree of empathy. That's no small request. We are literally fighting against biology, while femin…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:32 PM
2

Touche but some Canadian women definitely recognize the problem. My cousin is a cop -- the very personification of the patriarchy -- yet got completely abused by his crazy ex with the full support of the Canadian judicial system. She made multiple false accusations, trained his daughter to hate him, and lived high on the hog while he had to move back in with his mother in order to pay alimony. If that can happen to a fucking cop imagine the fate of the average Joe. You better believe my aunt kno…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:16 PM
6

You should ask the professor if you can show a Karen Straughan or Janice Fiamengo video, or something by an evolutionary psychologist like David Buss, or even the full Red Pill documentary. In the meantime I hope you will treat us to frequent updates. I find this post highly entertaining and applaud you for walking into the lion's den. A few points that I think need to be rammed into feminist's heads: Women have always had great power. Part of that power derives from the illusion of weakness. Th…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:07 PM
10

half of participants. Apparently the other half are delusional. But yeah I suppose it's progress.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:40 PM
1

Check the sidebar. No clickbait titles, advice animals or other low-effort image or text posts. Mods may remove these at their discretion.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:36 PM
8

Wait, you think the producers actually wanted the men to win? That's completely at odds with our ubiquitous "you go girl" culture. I think you could definitely set up a quasi-experiment where the women win by picking a bunch of hapless men and a bunch of women who hunt and fish and hike for a living or as a hobby. But if you're being honest with yourself a random sampling will invariably produce the result of the Dutch survivor episode. It's not a knock on women. Women are better at some things,…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:31 PM
7

men are much better at creating hierarchies It's important to qualify this statement. Men have no problem with hierarchies of ability but they definitely have a problem with what they consider unjust hierarchy, eg hierarchies based on violent domination or nepotism.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:24 PM
7

anti-male activist Accurately describes modern feminists to a T. Even if they're too dull to figure out what their movement has become and to a certain extent always was. In fact I'm going to start using the term regularly.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:13 PM
3

Yes I understand. But in both cases it's a demand that the responsibility be placed on the male rather than the female. In other words it's entirely consistent with the history of feminism: remove all responsibilities from women, place all responsibilities on men. Advantage females in every sphere, disadvantage males in every sphere.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:03 PM
8

“It is not up to people of color and women to solve the imbalance of service work by saying no,” she declares. “It is up to white men to solve the imbalance of service work by saying yes.” lol this reminds me of "affirmative consent". It's apparently too traumatic for a woman to utter the word "no" during a sexual encounter; instead the entire responsibility is placed on the man (to the point of absurdity, ie having to obtain verbal permission for every escalation of a sexual encounter). Demandi…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter