TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RoadsterTracker Archive

View 1 post and 64 comments by RoadsterTracker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
37

GeneralRoadsterTracker/r/MensRights26/05/21 08:05 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

By this Boy Scouts would be a good challenge. The "rite" would be the Eagle Scout Project, which teaches leadership on a project.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 03:00 PM
6

You might be able to be a friend (With a lot of boundaries in place!) to help guide her towards that, but you don't want to be in a relationship. There is far too much danger for both of you in that path... Therapy is certainly required in this case. You could consider talking to a school counselor about the situation, or something along those lines. If she isn't willing to talk to her family about getting appropriate help you should do that.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:49 PM
1

Honestly I would hope they wouldn't approve, but it is only an affiliate sponsorship. Still, they likely do not know...
/r/MensRights28/10/22 12:08 PM
14

> As a BetterHelp affiliate, we may receive compensation from BetterHelp if you purchase products or services through the links provided.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 02:49 PM
39

I find it interesting there is a well known mental health ad at the very beginning of the article. I wonder if said company would approve of this kind of article with their name on it... I would hope not...
/r/MensRights27/10/22 02:02 PM
35

There is actually evidence. The sending of money via the cash app is some reasonable evidence that something screwy happened. I would still talk with the police, explain the entire situation, and report her to the dating app service if at all possible. If you can do it sooner you'll be better, they could probably do something about it. You might even be able to reverse the transaction, saying it was done via extortion or something like that.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 07:48 PM
4

Huh, today I learned. Will remove that bit from the answer, it doesn't really add anything.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:44 PM
8

Nurse practitioners can prescribe medication in the US, and presumably in other places. They are an advanced form of nurse, basically one step below a doctor, and often times if one sees an urgent care for a cold or something relatively routine they are the ones that will look at you, and can prescribe medication as needed. Note that they won't see you for the more complicated issues.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:47 PM
13

There are religions where legitimately they preach against contraceptives. I can name several mainstream religions that do. Do you know of any that preach against helping men? I sure don't...
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:44 PM
53

Except she hasn't given the $7 million she got as a part of the divorce settlement away to charity like she said she was going to. I wonder if that's what he will end up with in the end...
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:56 PM
1

Ehh, Elon and Amber Heard haven't been in a relationship for years...
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:36 PM
38

JD will be okay, the most important thing as far as he is concerned is the public sees that he was a victim, and that will get him back in to Hollywood. Amber, on the other hand, well...
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:04 PM
46

Minus whatever the lawyers get...
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:45 PM
91

5 million is above the Virginia limit on punitive damages of $350k, and thus will almost certainly be reduced. Bottom line, Johnny Depp will walk away with $8,350,000 minus whatever the lawyers get.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:45 PM
4

I've seen it in a few groups something that is "Multi-generational" or something like that. Also, in theory, most if not all groups are open to everyone.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 09:27 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#United_States is a good summary of the laws when it comes to recording conversations. Not the end all be all, but it can be a good place to start. Bottom line, use it if you need it, and if it was legal.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 07:01 PM
45

I mean, I *might* be willing to believe this could be true if you exclude combatants, but that's a pretty significant exclusion...
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:47 PM
15

FYI, depending on the state this could actually be a legal requirement. Long story short, in the 1920s (ish) there were some really shoddy things that were done that ended up with a lot of people being sterilized without really wanting it, and so they made a bunch of laws to prevent such things from happening.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 05:22 PM
2

Didn't say that. I'm only pointing out that men benefit as well, while the advertising is target towards helping women. It's a really tough situation, but short of a complete society change, well... I'm absolutely not saying that this isn't a problem, but in the list of problems facing men, I'd say it's lower on the list.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 09:07 PM
1

https://twitter.com/WFPChief/status/1460323875804397568
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:32 PM
1

The link I included in the original reply?
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:06 PM
3

They came up with a plan, it just took a few weeks. Honestly, if someone gave me $6 billion to do something really cool, I would want a few weeks to put together a proper proposal myself...
/r/MensRights07/12/21 04:09 PM
2

There are many who are quite generous. Sure, maybe not every one, but... For the record, Jeff Bezos donated $10 billion to various causes in 2020. No doubt he will continue to donate more. https://apnews.com/article/amazoncom-inc-race-and-ethnicity-jeff-bezos-philanthropy-coronavirus-pandemic-56154051ca19fdd80c2fc003004702b0
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:38 PM
2

They aren't only providing aid for women and children, they are targeting the advertisement for women and children, but actually helping everyone.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:36 PM
2

The foundation is actually giving water to both genders, they just focus on the women and children because for whatever reason it raises more money then including men in the mix. Everyone benefits from this, there is more money so more men and women and children all get access to clean water, and the people donating get to feel good about helping women and children. Sure, there's a long term society impact, but...
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:35 PM
3

Not going to argue that. It's just not quite as bad as it seems.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:06 PM
35

Billionaire charity is still a form of charity... Still, most of the richest people in the world are quite generous, and have made a difference, but...
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:11 PM
350

Honest answer, he can probably raise more money if it is "for women". But in all seriousness, if women have access to clean and safe water, men likely will as well. If you look at the site, you can see that men are also benefiting. It just "sounds" better to mention women and children. https://water.org/our-impact/all-stories/
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:11 PM
0

I kind of want to post something here to request a stop to talking about extreme feminism here. I think the sub would be better if that were to happen.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 01:53 AM
-1

Keep in mind there are a number of types of feminism. One of those types is one that wants equality between the genders. That is a statement I can get behind. Personally I don't affiliate with the feminist movement, but in general I am all for promoting equality in the sexes. There are legitimate issues still in the feminists circle that should be addressed or at least looked at. There are also some in our camp. Despite what Wikipedia says, I don't think this is an anti-feminist subreddit.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 04:28 PM
-1

Do you happen to know how many female rangers there are? There aren't many. As of April 2020 there were 50, I doubt there are more than 60 now. There is nothing I have seen that they perform any worse than any other ranger. https://www.armytimes.com/opinion/commentary/2020/05/03/meet-the-quiet-trailblazers/ All I know is I certainly wouldn't EVER want to go against ANY of them in a physical contest of any kind... We can defend men's rights without being outright sexist.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:21 AM
4

They are actually the same for now, but there is a lot of discussion of changing them. The standards for a ranger are straightforward, and don't have a gender based role. https://www.goarmy.com/ranger/your-questions-about-serving.html#requirements It is worth noting that the general requirements for the army have gender based rules. But as I like to tell people, in general men are stronger than women, but I know more than a few women who are stronger than I am.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 09:41 PM
10

Let me say what I think you are trying to say. There are female Rangers and Green Berets, but there are vastly fewer of them because the standards are the same between men and women, and as a whole women have a harder time meeting those. Those that do qualify, however, meet the same standards as any of those in their various groups.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 06:19 PM
5

I think it is more of a symptom of it being more "okay" for women to see a therapist than men. Men aren't "supposed" to be needing things like that, so they simply don't seek it out. From those men that I know who have gone through therapy there has been none of the behaviors described.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 05:26 PM
5

Yeah, I would offer advice and friendship, and Christmas/ Birthday presents and such, but not direct monetary support. In other words, be a parent, but not their sole means of support.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 04:54 PM
9

Not too much different than YouTube, Twitch, or any other number of services. A few people who have "The right stuff" make it big, most of them (Myself included) don't do nearly as well.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:21 PM
26

If it can be proven they were lying, I'm certainly okay with that. But there are a number of instances where I wouldn't be like this. Mistaken identify would be one (IE, a crime was certainly committed, but the wrong person was accused), mistaken intent, or mental health. But in instances like the one described by OP, I very much agree with this sentiment.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 08:11 PM
6

The later 100% happened, female reporters wanted equal access and got it. And honestly, I can understand that. But I would have preferred the ban them all approach vs opening up the locker rooms wide open.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 08:51 PM
11

Seriously, how did this even become a thing in the first place...
/r/MensRights04/07/21 08:29 PM
1

Military wife's should not be given a bigger reward than their spouses, I 100% agree with that. But as written, women get a smaller benefit, and honestly, there's nothing that says that it can only be used by the women. Really effectively it is a small increase in salary to a married man in the military vs a single man, or that's the way I interpret it. I won't make a judgement call as to if that's an acceptable thing, but I don't really look at it as a sexist issue, more married vs single.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 08:18 PM
-2

First of all, most women today chose to have children, historically that hasn't always been the case. Secondly, there's a huge difference between "I am doing as much" and "share the burden". Sure, a military wife isn't in the direct line of combat, but having to worry about your spouse constantly, move around the world, be physically separated from your parent for months or longer at a time, etc is a sacrifice compared to someone who doesn't have to do those things. There is a role in this world…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 06:37 PM
8

Just because it isn't done with malice doesn't mean it doesn't have consequences. Much of the worst racism isn't done with malice either, but can have far reaching effects.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 01:21 PM
2

True enough. Still...
/r/MensRights27/05/21 12:26 PM
9

The reference that the article mentioned, Tim the Tool Man, was better than many. A bit inept at being a parent sometimes, but he worked hard and did have a relationship with his kids. It seems to have gotten worse in general since then...
/r/MensRights27/05/21 11:41 AM
30

This is an article I found interesting. The basic idea is that society has a stereotype, particularly since the 90s, that men don't do much with their families. It also mentions some of the potential harm of such stereotypes.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 08:32 PM
18

For whatever it is worth, if the roles were reversed I would do the same thing. Not going to say that a person can't make another person's mental health worse, but in the end, there are always alternatives to suicide, and the person committing the act bears the responsibility for it. I've seen many instances of people with mental health problems who blame others for their problems where it isn't justified, or more commonly not justified to the level they bring it to. Absolutely take some respons…
/r/MensRights29/10/20 01:40 PM
10

What is the OP supposed to do, post court orders and tax returns on the internet for all to see? I would really hope that such proof is available, but I don't think it is reasonable to ask for proof in this particular situation, where there are no real consequences.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 04:45 PM
18

If it is false, and we treat it as truth, then a man has received some sympathy that wasn't warranted. If it is true, and we treat it as false, then a man who has literally lost everything is losing perhaps the only people who have believed him. Personally, I'll take it as truth, there is no reason not to in our situation.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 04:25 PM
29

Considering the fact that boys typically read less than girls, a bit of encouragement could be a good thing...
/r/MensRights22/10/20 12:01 PM
61

The question really is, best for which child? The new born, or the then 13 year old?
/r/MensRights14/09/20 12:20 PM
1

I didn't find the bit of text that say that, but I 100% believe it. If this was a more mainstream site, that would be much more concerning, but this seems like a tabloid type site focused on women, and that being the case, let them use male centric language for surveys and such. Know your audience, and judge accordingly.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 08:07 PM
5

I mean, it seems like this site is very much for women. That being the case, it's hard to blame them for the male-centric language. I have nothing wrong with a specific site for a specific gender, and using language on that site as such.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 07:57 PM
81

My wife and I legally adopted a few kids, together. They send a survey out every year asking how it is going. They always include my wife's name, and never mine. It's a small source of irritation, but...
/r/MensRights22/08/20 09:48 PM
6

At most 2%. It's really hard to take a theoretical error down to 0.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 12:23 PM
1

I remember watching a TV show once where a number of teams were driving racing across the country. One of the teams featured a few Black people driving a nice car. They were pulled over at least twice during the drive across the US. At some point they switched to a not-so-nice car, and stopped getting pulled over. I can't remember the show, but... I remember the show now! Cannonball Run 2001. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannonball_Run_2001
/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:57 PM
3

If I were the OP, I would take the paper as written, add in proper sources (Journals, government papers, etc) both in the text and via footnote citations, and simply tell the teacher that I have sourced the paper and not really comment much more than that.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 10:20 PM
1

They aren't actually sure, but...
/r/MensRights29/03/20 12:25 AM
19

Men are dying at a higher rate with COVID-19 than women. Just saying...
/r/MensRights28/03/20 11:16 AM
10

You weren't the only one, BTW.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 06:30 PM
11

This should be looked at the same as if this was a 21-year-old man having sex with a little girl. The article is remarkably well balanced.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 04:08 PM
0

Creative writing and musicians are easier to understand. They get money based on how many copies they sell, so it's kind of a group think that shows their worth. It's much more difficult with art, because the prices are very subjective.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 05:24 PM
49

Honestly, I bet if you pulled the same data, while there might be a few more male artists, I bet less than 1% of the male artists account for 50% of the revenue. Getting paid in the art world is VERY strange, to say the least...
/r/MensRights23/09/19 01:22 PM
3

You would think such documentation should be available via the kids doctors...
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:03 PM
1

Even better title. 2001 study finds the majority of non-reciprocal interpersonal violence (Physical abuse) comes is perpetrated by women.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter