TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rob__T Archive

View 3 posts and 227 comments by Rob__T on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-18

Good for them. Dude never deserved a memorial in the first place. Anyways, about the Epatein Files?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/25 07:50 PM
2

Knowing the difference between debt and what is available in the economy is pretty basic economics, yet you missed that entirely.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 01:04 AM
0

Seems like you don't understand economics, perhaps you should learn about it, since those are both not valid responses to what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:07 AM
2

Well your idea is stupid on the face of it. And yet there are countries that do it and parents have a better quality of life. With what money? Are you not familiar with the trillions of dollars in the US economy? And that siphoning off some of that for services is a time honored US tradition? Who is the intended recipient? I love how you accuse the idea of being stupid but can't grasp who the intended recipients of assisted or subsidized childcare support would be. Collectivism has worked for so…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 03:37 PM
2

Wow, what a reasoned argument, and clearly indicative and reflective of exactly what I said and in no way misrepresents anything put forward by anyone.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:49 PM
-4

I feel compelled to point out that this person has a 100% valid point, and rather than being able to say "Hey yeah actually this is legitimate", most of this thread is turning it into being about men. Like, that's the very thing feminists do that we should all collectively agree on is wrong. Can't we acknowledge a completely gender neutral opinion on something (That happens to be a correct opinion even) without turning into something about men? Like, the point is that we should be, collectively …
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:54 PM
-1

Why should anyone be surprised that a state full of far right religious zealots would pass a law purely for optics and not defend men from harm?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 09:37 PM
-7

Twitter is a company and not the government, you're not getting punished for hate speech. No company is obligated to treat any kind of speech as equal to every other kind of speech.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/23 10:44 PM
8

So, here are the requirements to be a cop in my state: Be at least 21 years of age Have a high school diploma or GED Pass a physical fitness test, medical examination including a psychological component Have no felony convictions (some misdemeanors are also grounds for disqualification) Be official residents in the state and hold a valid drivers license Be a non-smoker I dunno where people get the idea that any police officer has to be a stable, well adjusted adult. There is none. There is no sc…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 02:50 PM
-1

Yeah but you’re calling me a dishonest liar which I don’t appreciate. Don't pretend to be a centrist while saying you'll vote for an authoritarian then. In what way is Desantis authoritarian? Literal book banning.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:37 PM
-2

It's not what I say it's what you said. I'm just tired of authoritarian grifters pretending like their positions are reasonably neutral when they objectively are not, and am gonna make it a point to call out that disingenuous bullshit when I see it.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 07:50 PM
-1

I mean you're basically conceding you're a dishonest liar.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 06:41 PM
-3

If you vote DeSantis you can never claim to be any sort of centrist. He is an authoritarian by every conceivable metric.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 12:31 AM
1

Proud lefty. Anti-capitalist, want to change the economic focus to housing first priority, want to get us all on a single payer system for medical care and make sure everyone has their basic needs met as just a bog standard of existing in America, none of this "Live paycheck to paycheck at the will of your rich employer" bullshit. Nuke private prisons from orbit, rebuild the entire legal system to be about protecting people from violent crimes, and change the function of police at a fundamental …
/r/MensRights28/02/23 12:26 AM
-8

Yeah, here's kinda the telling thing about where OP is coming from. Most of the top comments here are full of the whole "women can't" bullshit, and OP has responded with at least passive agreement and definitely nothing arguing against it. Also OP's last sentence is extremely grating, completely full of the "Men are supposed to work and provide" bullshit. I want a future where we get to pick our own goals. We live in a time where we have the ability to have our most basic needs provided for, we …
/r/MensRights26/02/23 02:58 PM
0

There are way better alternatives to killing a kid e.g foster care to a loving family who would appreciate caring for and loving a child as their own This is typical religious horseshit. Until the pro birth movement starts adopting kids en masse, it's not valid. Foster care is absolutely cram packed with kids who aren't getting adopted, your position just adds to that pile.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 05:20 AM
6

Being against bodily autonomy isn't great. Being anti-feminist because feminism embraces misandry is one thing, but you're not gonna get sympathy from me for conservative bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 05:17 AM
0

lol, after Trump's? Nobody gets to bitch about Scotus nominations after that fiasco.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 05:04 PM
64

He should sue the fuck out of the board
/r/MensRights12/12/22 03:26 AM
4

The obvious solution here is to dissolve the monarchy
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:29 PM
1

Yeah, and that's a stupid rule lol People don't take jobs just to go on leave, and honestly, even if it did occasionally happen, businesses are inhumane and already have enough money. I couldn't give two shits if some businesses lost some money to some new parents.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 03:33 PM
10

Or, and hear me out, make it so that it can't be against any rules to take parental leave. It's time to force businesses to be humane, not beg them for it.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 10:39 PM
8

Im against prisoners having dignity. There is so much wrong here on so many levels. 1) Not every prisoner is someone who has had a victim. So from the outset you are building a position based on a false pretense. 2) For people who did victimize someone, the lengths that the other person was victimized has high variance. Someone who maybe vandalized something is not the same as someone who got arrested for fighting, and that in turn is different from murder. 3) "What about the victim" does not ac…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 03:28 PM
31

which sometimes means they aren’t coming in with the same background Irrelevant as to the quality of the work. People should not be getting extra points for their work for any reason that has nothing to do with the actual work. If people are gonna say "Women can do anything a man can do", then suck it up and prove it. Lowering the bar of entry does the exact opposite and shows that women can't do what men do and need special privileges and concessions in the quality of work to get there. The hop…
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:23 PM
-40

men have zero reproductive rights in the west. ...As opposed to?
/r/MensRights26/10/22 09:41 PM
1

Ah yes, with all the woke countries in the world, this is definitely a serious question.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 04:21 PM
1

Bahahahaha, no it wouldn't. The states that had it banned before would have those bans kicked right back in, and we'd see more of Graham proposing federal bans on it just like he did with abortion, which people like you said "would never happen" with that too. We'd be going through the same rigamarole we are seeing now with Republicans trying to ban abortion. The pattern there is quite clear. Also going (basically his job) does not excuse it. He's an asshat out to strip rights of people and he's…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:37 PM
1

Except you do know the moment your science teacher offhand mentions anything about having a wife or kids. Suddenly it's not OK when the answer diverges from the norm.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:50 PM
1

Thank you for demonstrating exactly my point. "We think it's OK to be gay. We just don't want to know it." Also there's still a conservative push to reverse gay marriage in the US, so I don't buy your bullshit at all.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:47 PM
2

Until we're open about out, then it's "Why are you pushing your sexuality in our face"
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:35 PM
5

This is definitely definitely not describing modern conservatives.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:43 PM
4

You should look up world politics sometime. Democrats and Republicans are both right wing, the Overton window in the US is skewed very much to the right relative to other countries.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 01:42 PM
1

Right, you don't get to speak for the rest of us. Speak for yourself.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:12 PM
0

My money is my money. Backed and provided by whatever government of whatever country you live in, with an education and resources provided by that government to enable you to work. I work for it not you. Ok but it's still part of the same economic pool. Nobody's individual wealth exists in vacuum independent of everyone else's. Men have the highest incarceration rate. Highest suicide rate. Highest likelihood of being victims of a violent crime. Work the most dangerous jobs. Agreed. Have zero say…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:22 PM
1

Worth noting that is not a valid refutation of what I said.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:18 PM
-2

You don't get to speak for "the rest of us", plenty of people understand how bodily autonomy works and it's clear you don't.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:51 PM
-2

I fundamentally disagree with this. Public health is a public concern, "your" money does not exist in vacuum, and a healthy population with proper access to all forms of medical care benefits everyone. This take is "I got mine, fuck you"
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:50 PM
1

One. I do not read “pamphlets from anti-abortion centres”! Yet you regurgitate the same bullshit. The failure rate for condoms is actually quite high. Just like this. And four. The reason why “pulling out” doesn’t work is for reasons I outlined elsewhere. You outlining it is absolutely meaningless. It is not recognized as an effective form of birth control, so no matter how much you try and reiterate it, you're still wrong.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:50 AM
1

If pulling out was as effective as you said it would be the most recommended form of birth control. It's not, stop being obtuse.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:48 AM
1

Because it has no basis in medical science whatsoever lol
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:44 AM
1

Stop reading pamphlets from anti abortion centers.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:43 AM
3

...No, no it's not.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:01 AM
2

[Citation needed] And your conclusion doesn't follow even with citation. So you're wrong basically in totality.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:00 AM
-6

Partially correct and partially incorrect. "Common sense" is not actually a real thing in the first place, so no, the idea of "common sense" being in the courtroom is a really bad idea. But you're right about the rest of it and we need a major legal reform, especially when it comes to private lawyers.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/22 05:00 PM
4

You really need to do some research into how case law and legal theory work. It's never as simple as it seems.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/22 04:59 PM
1

Meh? Everyone should be upset over the ruling.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:07 AM
33

Unfortunately being anti feminist is about the only thing you can positively say about the US right wing. And even then it wants to enforce rigid gender roles across the board so even that positive is tainted with shit.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 09:13 PM
-2

anti-right, anti-conservative I'm fine with these.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:12 PM
2

What a stupid comic lol Anyone walking up with a gun stating their political positions should automatically be at least suspect
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:10 PM
3

Absolutely yes. He would turn it into a giant ad for himself. Not just Tesla, but his own damn talking points. Anyone critical of him? Banned. Anyone doesn't agree with his views? Banned. Turning it slowly into a propaganda machine for politics that benefit him and churning out lots of misinformation so he can keep doing pump and dumps with stock and bullshit cryptocurrencies. Fuck Musk.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:07 PM
0

Reddit needs to be overtaken by Musk. Fuck that, fuck that a million times over, fuck It every way until the end of time. I am so tired of hearing that dickweed being paraded around as though he had any sort of interest in anything but himself. He enjoys his cult of personality, he's rich not by his own efforts but because he inherited Daddy's emerald mine, he isn't the actual intellect behind anything, the actual working engineers are. While your other points may have merit, jumping to "A stupi…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:02 PM
3

You're a racist piece of shit. Go away.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/22 10:25 AM
1

"I took a metaphor literally, therfore you are dumb" Ok genius.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:35 AM
1

Are you seriously so dumb as to not understand metaphors?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 05:57 PM
0

lol, it's not. It's over and the corpse is just taking a while to rot away.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:47 AM
1

Your inability to be reasonable does not make refutations of your position stupid. You're not making valid points, just pushing dated puritan ideology. The world has moved on from that and is better for it.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:54 AM
1

I do, it's just bullshit lol
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:52 AM
2

That's stupid. Sex is fun, feeling confident is fun. People posting their nudes can be for any number of reasons, and if someone can get money out of it, good for them. "Cover it up" is stupid and someone not doing so speaks absolutely nothing to how people value their bodies. By the way your logic doesn't work consistently. You bitch about girls selling their bodies for porn, but then say "porn is free", then proceed to bitch about girls not valuing their bodies, which see above paragraph in th…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:12 PM
10

Right, typical puritan bullshit then. This isn't about men's rights to you, clearly.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:53 AM
18

Many are wrong.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:42 AM
8

The distinct lack of that in your posts and the volume of "Naked girls bad, society becoming immoral" speaks volumes to your lack of care.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:41 AM
1

I think this post reeks of puritanical conservative bullshit. All labor, all labor, is selling your body for something. People should be able to do what they want with their bodies. If some people look good enough that other people will pay for their nudes, or even for sex, cool. So long as it's consensual, it's cool. A lot of other "respectable" jobs are actually harmful to individuals and society at large, while porn is just porn. Bitching about this is just absurd to the umpteenth degree. Tak…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:34 AM
-1

Countries have a right to protect their cultures This is 100% dependent on how we're defining "culture". Are we talking harmless things like holidays, ways of celebrating different times of year, food preparation, etc? Then yes. If we're talking legit humanitarian issues, then hell no.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 01:03 PM
3

Yeah...Doesn't actually negate the completely fair criticism of Hungary's culture
/r/MensRights28/08/22 01:00 PM
17

I think the invasion of gay bars is mostly about being “with it” and boasting about how virtuous you are. There's something that's glossed over a lot in these discussions. This isn't actually the case, it's a side benefit. The truth of the matter is they feel entitled to the gay men's attention and wallets. They will nag you to buy them drinks, they will flirt and occupy your time when you're not interested, and they will grope you thinking "It's harmless fun" and be all offended if you try to p…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 02:19 PM
2

Both definitely are not, lol
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/22 03:27 PM
19

I mean, we should be moving away from the health insurance system because it is innately grade A horseshit anyways.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:03 PM
-17

This comment is dripping with incel and misogyny. What you're saying is that men should get on demand baby service and that's it. That's not how human psychology or families work, and it's kinda weird that you would want this.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 09:21 PM
-12

. Don’t act like it’s all Republicans fault it stays as is. Republicans are the biggest group of people who support gender roles. So yeah, I will, along with a host of other major issues we're facing. I am so tired of the defense of conservatism in this sub. Republicans are not our friends, they oppose our positions just as much, if not more so, than feminists.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 09:23 PM
28

When didn't it?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/22 11:50 PM
3

I don't object to the idea of paying taxes for self employed prostitution, but Do your part to stop cyber prostitution Fuck off with that puritan bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/22 06:46 PM
3

lol, nah this sub leans right but there are enough people who can think that trying to push partisan bullshit get rightfully lambasted.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 09:16 PM
0

Right right, typical conservative stupidity, snark with no useful substance.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 12:10 AM
-3

"Actually under Biden..." You may want to pat attention to world issues because it's not "Under Biden", it's literally everywhere. You're being deliberately selective. Also Republicans are anti union, so yeah they're definitionally a threat to the working man.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:27 PM
-6

lol using fox as a source
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:25 PM
3

You're free to run your company like that, and see how well it does. Nah, see, the idea that "you should be free to run your company however" directly leads to predatory behaviors like you describe in the rest of your post. Fuck that If you need people for your company (and subsequently you to live comfortably) to succeed, then those people need to be able to also live under that same model. If they can't then there's something wrong with how the company is set up. It needs to be made illegal fo…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/22 08:27 PM
2

Odds are you wouldn't like my solution. I'm not gonna get any less greedy just because you and other commies think I should. You're off to a great start. Ignorance and being an asshole. We already solved this problem lol, given the state of the country clearly not Under 30h a week, that way we don't have to pay benefits, and we have 25% more people on the books who can be called-in as needed. lol Part time workers are not a solution. In the first place, it's disgusting that you think it's cool t…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/22 03:04 PM
1

I love when people who make obviously wrong statements say "do more research", it shows they don't understand what that is either.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:59 AM
0

It doesn’t deprive anyone of choice. When states make something illegal they are depriving someone of choice. When SCOTUS removes the right to an abortion and kicks it to states where they will restrict it, it's a deprivation of choice. You are factually incorrect here. Clearly you haven’t actually read in depth what is happening. Given that you couldn't accurately state the situation, it seems more plausible that you don't understand what's actually happening. How about people choose to be resp…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 08:07 PM
0

It's a red herring, you have no justification for calling irresponsible. You not liking it does not make it irresponsible, and it's definitionally taking ownership and dealing with an issue directly. It's just not the way you like.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 07:53 PM
1

I really wish we could lose the tankie dipshits that don't realize this would be a problem in non-corporations too. A properly funded society that has safety nets built into it that is centered around helping the population at large rather than lacking the boots of business owners could handle this. Setting a standard of having extra staff on board to be able to handle unexpected situations would handle this. Your inability to conceive of a world where the population at large are at the forefron…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/22 07:18 PM
6

Not how bodily autonomy works, keep your backwards beliefs at church and quit burdening society with them.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 07:10 PM
0

And abortion is a responsible mid pregnancy choice. You're not avoiding the red herring with this statement.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 07:09 PM
-5

Yeah, abortions are personal responsibility What you're saying is a typical anti choice red herring
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:37 AM
-11

Which ties in nicely to the post you're responding to, because conservatives have actively been sabotaging public education for these purposes.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:36 AM
21

I mean, yes but the conclusion "Therefor anti choice" doesn't follow.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:34 AM
10

I really wish that we'd lose the simps for corporations, they tend to have really shit takes.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/22 03:17 AM
1

Fuck that. I'm opposed to the overturning of Roe, but that doesn't automatically make it obligatory that men become infertile for women. There are options to prevent pregnancy for women and if her solution is for you to ruin your wants in the future, your future should come first.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:00 AM
13

You're not really asking a valid question and I think you know this. Obviously the schools have the ability to solve the title 9 complaints in a way that benefits everyone, and they aren't. If you're really that outraged at the changes, blame the schools. It seems more like you're trying to concern troll though.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 07:55 PM
6

We have a larger than average amount of people here who think "Men's rights" == "Going back to the time when men were the breadwinner" and they're vocal about it. New issues become something that people don't like, and instead of having discussions on how to handle new issues and have discussions regarding these things, it tends to be "These people are bad." That said, Trans Rights Activists (As a separation from trans people as a whole) tend to be very vocal, obnoxious people who make demands t…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:24 PM
23

Yeah, so what? It's deliberately trying to make the consequences of the war be focused on women. Fuck that noise.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:53 PM
-19

The guy bought into the ivermectin bullshit. Towerhouse of intellect he is not.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 02:17 PM
1

And as a bit of a more left leaning person, please don't think we're against Men's Rights or anything idk why people even think that. I think it's because of the abortion issue. Rather than understanding the more nuanced "There's issues with a man's right to not be a parent and it's ridiculous that women get a ticket out but men are saddled with a lifetime of debt", it's "Abortion is murder and we want our women to have our babies and not get a choice" and thus project that pro birth perspective…
/r/MensRights11/04/22 01:50 PM
6

The problem here is that inclusivity generally isn't useful when talking about actual physiology. What happens when a transwoman who had bottom surgery dies and is identified? "Body with vagina" is a useless term because that body is going to have male physiology everywhere. I'm fine with the idea of accepting trans people socially I'm all areas where biology and physiology don't play a role in interaction, but that kinda goes out the window when it does (Sports, medicine). I don't think it's un…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:30 PM
7

He is literally the most knowledgeable person ever ...That is an *absurdly* bold claim.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 05:27 AM
4

He bought into the ivermectin bullshit and embraces right wing horseshit and pretends to be a christian while not actually being one. Guy's a clown.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 05:24 AM
1

Which betrays your lack of understanding on the very issue of bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 02:39 PM
1

We have societies that recognize natural rights we already possess and it's the role of government to defend those rights; they're not granted by those governments. That's exactly not how it works. You don't have rights innately. They are granted. You're saying you have them but there's no specific attribute you can point to on a person and say "See, this person has this right, it's in their genes" or anything. You're putting forth a ridiculous notion that doesn't work in reality. We can sit her…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 02:11 AM
3

You do realize that this pro birther red herring isn't an actual argument that addresses the issue of bodily autonomy, correct?
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:48 AM
1

That's where you're wrong. Rights are not granted by governments; rights are natural. False. We as a society recognize rights and have governments that grant and enforcement. The fact that you don't have the same rights when you travel to different countries alone just disproves your position. What you're describing makes up the basis of all man-made atrocities ever committed. The state doesn't own you and it's dangerous to believe so. Nobody said the state owns you. But the reality of the situa…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:45 AM
1

Appealing to authority doesn't confer objective validity. Uh, you might want to look up what the appeal to authority fallacy is. Bodily autonomy is a right, rights are granted by governments, courts are a branch of government. It's not a fallacy. Your argument doesn't have a basis in reality. It's just how you personally feel and want it to be. That's not relevant.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:05 PM
5

Read up case law and rulings on how this works in contexts regarding abortion and ones that don't regard abortion. The tl;dr is that dependency on another person to live effectively amounts to infringing on the personal autonomy of the person being depended on, even in circumstances where the person being depended on caused the dependency. Your statement is a red herring and not valid.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:50 PM
15

Unfortunately that's the nature of bodily autonomy, it's something we're gonna have to just accept as reality.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 04:45 PM
1

You're just trolling now, right?
/r/MensRights26/03/22 04:56 AM
1

We were never a democracy , we are a republic. Which is democratically elected, and restricting voting using bad reasoning based on no evidence is disgusting. The Federal government has gained too much power. Using what metrics? theories are proving themselves true. Just look at the Hunter Biden laptop Look, politics is riddled with "play down the bad things." But when you're bringing up Hunter Biden (Who, I should note, is not relevant to any political discussion because he was never running fo…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:55 PM
2

I mean, wanting to retain a functional democracy that doesn't embrace conspiracy theories, theocrats, and insurrectionists isn't a huge ask. I definitely want to see more of what we have that this thread is about, but the price tag can't be "Being OK with Republican bullshit."
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:47 PM
6

Feminists hate sexism, not men I don't believe you. I remind you that women own a fraction of the wealth A very small fraction of the population at large owns most of the wealth, and it's a detriment to society at large. I'm not particularly interested in changing the gender of who holds the wealth, it needs to be disbursed through the entire population again. Also I notice you aren't looking at the bottom performance of society either. Homelessness and poverty also is predominantly men, are you…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:39 PM
-3

That logic is, incidentally, why I will never vote red.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:32 PM
1

"The science" is clearly not in your favor. Your metric is "Does life start at conception" which is not in dispute. A fetus does not have human attributes beyond "being alive" until late in development (Yeah yeah I've seen all the pro life horseshit signs before, they certainly like to try and paint a picture but it's not accurate). Also your "good chance" has been hotly debated in the public eye but the reality of the situation is that "the science" has never been a basis for changing abortion …
/r/MensRights20/03/22 04:25 PM
1

A human life begins at conception, biologically speaking. Don't believe me? Believe the 95% of biologists who agree with me. Starting to live is not the same thing as having all the elements that would be present at different degrees of maturity. Human life begins at conception, but the overwhelming majority of biological function doesn't even exist at that point. This isn't relevant.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 04:12 AM
1

Nope, because that's not a standard you could ever set into law or make the basis for laws. Nor could you use it to deal with the rights to bodily autonomy. It completely fails as an idea.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 03:47 AM
1

That's also not how it works.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 06:41 PM
5

As does a new born baby. What would you call people who killed those? I'll answer this. A murderer. I know you think this is some sort of gotcha, but this is classical false equivalency. Not valid argumentation. My ability to legally drive under the influence of alcohol disagrees with you You be consistent in your arguments first. Make it so that I can drink and drive at whatever speed I want past through the local nursery. Again, false equivalency. You don't have a right to operate motor vehicl…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 06:31 PM
4

Being pro-life is about being pro responsibility. Patently false. developing human life So you agree it lacks many attributes of a fully formed human. supercedes all other rights. Bodily autonomy does in fact supercede rights. You have the right not to use your body to sustain another person's life in any capacity in any other situation, including if something you did caused the dependency. Until you're willing to put your money where your mouth is and subsidize a child for people who can't affo…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 06:11 PM
4

The term pro birth has always struck me as odd, because isn't birth just the natural process after someone is conceived? The overwhelming majority of "pro lifers" are all about making sure the mother gives birth and gives them support for maybe the first 6 months of having a baby. Then it's "Oh we're not here for handouts go find a job and raise this kid that's going to incur lifelong expenses and responsibilities you may never have been ready or able to handle. Oh and don't have an abortion if …
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:36 PM
-2

Being a reddit mod != being representative of a given subreddit.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/22 03:57 AM
-4

I support the antiwork movement and that interview was entirely cringe. That said, this person clearly was picked as bait and is exactly what Fox wanted to rile up its already extreme conservative base. The antiwork subreddit almost unilaterally condemned this, so take the context of the interview with like, 30 grains of salt.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/22 02:55 AM
1

Please, we live in a digital age. So? While a majority of Americans (Yeah I'll be US centric here for a moment) have a social media profile, the amount of people active on those is much lower, and the percentile of people using all those platforms is much lower, and when you also consider the amount of people subbed to any one subreddit or something, it's clear that they don't make up statistical significance within a population at large. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-me…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:20 PM
3

Well, you wear your bigotry like a badge, I guess. Definitely not barking up the wrong tree though, thanks for putting your hatred on full display for everyone to see. Meanwhile I'll keep arguing in favor of men's rights as part of a campaign for equal rights for all, without resorting to bigotry against people not like me. Also, try being online less and interacting with people in the real world. If you're shaping your opinions on what happens on fucking Twitter, you have a major case of being …
/r/MensRights02/03/22 08:15 AM
12

"You aren't like the other ones, you're one of the rare good ones."
/r/MensRights02/03/22 06:27 AM
17

Gay man here. No, we are not one and the same and nor do I spend time bashing straight men to appease women. Gay men aren't a monolith and there are those of us who despise this type of bullshit as much as you do. Maybe not be a bigot in the future.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:57 AM
49

I think they should be sending convoys out with young children and elderly. If their standard is "Abled bodied men fight" then able bodied women should too.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 06:36 PM
22

unless victory is already looking hopeless In this case it is, Russia is a major world power, Ukraine is not.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 06:35 PM
-5

False allegations are the majority. You don't need proof to see that claim 100% wrong. The burden of proof is on you, and you don't get to hand wave that away. Citation fucking needed, and your attitude sucks. I am 100% on board for more stringent handling of rape claims. What you just said is absolutely disgusting and nowhere near close to reasonable. Everyone here should be appaled.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:18 PM
0

...If we were talking "Can't make noise" or "Can't eat literally anything", yeah sure. "Hey, no nuts please" is far from unreasonable. It's really entitled to say "People who have certain needs that are the mildest of inconveniences for others should have to make ridiculous arrangements so as not to tell others they have to go without a nut based snack for a couple hourse"
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/22 05:07 PM
-2

I hardly call "Hey you need to not eat this specific type of snack on this particular flight" a burden. There are people who have severe reactions to having been in the vicinity of the food they are allergic to, picking one data point really isn't reasonable nor correct. You can't tell people "Sorry you can't fly because we serve nuts on the plane." That's an absurd standard to set.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/22 09:12 AM
-7

Like, on the one hand, yes, pussu pass denied is nice. On the other, I can't say I like that the attendants were like "Oh First Class must get their nuts." Like, sorry, but no. I don't care what class you're on, you can be told "Sorry, someone has a nut allergy on board and we can't serve these this flight." There should absolutely be a policy in place where someone can report an allergy and the foods in question taken off the snack list.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/22 10:42 PM
1

Says the person so distraught by a post on a subreddit that they have to come in trying to attack everyone responding. There's definitely personal fragility here, but it's not with the people you seem to think.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:59 PM
2

lol, The instant someone says the patriarchy is real and is "the problem", they lose all credibility. You should really heed your own advice at thr end there.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:58 PM
1

you can manipulate the truth any way you like As, seemingly, can you. This isn't an argument. however it doesnt change the fact that virtual or not, it is rape Rape requires physical contact. Virtual reality does not have physical contact. Ergo, by definition, not rape. stop trying to make this ‘virtual rape’ ok Again, not rape. so u can feel better about wanking off to it. You have no idea what I get off to. youre clearly the bigot here im afraid. And yet you're the only one who has made sweepi…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:41 PM
17

The definition of rape precludes any sort of virtual interaction, literally impossible. Also, you're clearly a bigot.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 02:06 AM
0

I mean, yes in the abstract you're right. But holding a woman as a POW is about a grain of sand on the beach when talking about spending money on taxez and isn't gonna come close to impacting anything as far as funding goes. And part of the point of paying taxes is to be sure rights are upheld, and this is exactly the type of case that should be hammered out so that there is substantive precedent in law for how to handle it.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/22 01:30 AM
-1

I hate to say it but I agree with the assessment that was put forward by the people that took her case, I don't really like the idea that governments can take away rights to a fair trial. I would have preferred to see an outcome where she is allowed to be taken into military custody in the vein of a POW and be given trial on the basis that she has armed military guards around her at all times and her, and the only time she is allowed to be outside a military facility for her trial. Or, hell, hol…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/22 05:06 PM
6

Bye, you won't be missed.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 10:16 PM
5

You really should consider rereading what happened in the thread because it's nowhere near close to what you're describing.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 08:07 PM
5

You keep saying superior gender. I'm curious which one you're referring to, because so far in this thread you're the only one who seems to have an idea of there even being a superior gender, mevermind which one it is. But beyond that, again, your reading comprehension fails spectacularly again. Feminists aren't a "cause" of not doing it. The "cause" is a lack of interest. The only point being made here is that feminist "study" is suspect because feminism itself is an ideology and that will (at b…
/r/MensRights23/12/21 08:02 PM
4

the only ones who care about studies on racism based on gender are feminists. Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, clearly.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 07:01 PM
5

lolno White Knighting is when men, who unsolicitedly, spout rhetoric or platitudes to try and earn social points and/or get laid. Literally has nothing to do with what you're saying it does and the only beating white knights can do is to their meat.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 07:00 PM
5

Literally no one cares what you men say about women. You do apparently The problem is that you’re not advocating for men’s rights. You’re just bitching about women. Pointing out double standards and where false perceptions exists is completely legitimate. Your 'summary' of what's going on here is willful ignorance and misrepresentation. You're not making any valid points.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 06:56 PM
9

Well yeah, because that would disrupt feminist narrative and the only ones who care about studies on racism based on gender are feminists. So it's not a surprise that this is the case.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:49 PM
5

Yoy clearly don't understand the term "white knight" lol
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:47 PM
10

Piss off. Women aren't above criticism. You feel free to bitch about men but when a topic comes up where demographic information shows up that suggests that women are not collectively saints, you get all offended and whiny. You should probably note I said "you" get all offended and whiny and not "women" because I don't assume all women are obnoxious cunts like you. You're just mad because someone dared suggest your personal preferred in group doesn't behave perfectly. Your opinions are garbage a…
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:44 PM
1

Breaking the status quo is a ridiculous goal. I can start shitting on car roofs and decorating it as snowmen and break the status quo of car decorations. Endorsing libertarianism would basically be the political version of breaking the status quo. I am not on board with a psuedo-anarchist movement.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:42 PM
10

You're telling me that the political ideology that embraces gender roles and societal regression is willing to promote inequality between the genders? Color me surprised
/r/MensRights08/12/21 06:36 AM
3

Share that recording if you're able. It would be a great way to demonstrate that these things are happening.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 05:55 AM
4

If you're conceding that you seem to be the exception, that's a confirmation of what the post you're responding to is saying.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:16 PM
3

US libertarians are not the same as libertarians elsewhere. Our political terms and Overton Window are absurdly fucked.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 07:55 PM
38

Can you give a link to the case? I just know I'm gonna be answering this issue later...
/r/MensRights29/03/21 12:56 PM
-2

lol sounds more like trumpism to me. Horseshoe theory be real.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/21 07:04 PM
11

It's worth noting that the decision to reverse the lower ruling seems to be a legal precedent & procedural one and not one biased against men. I'm not saying that the ultimate decision should be that men only have to sign up for the draft, but there is a valid argument to be made in court practice for "We lower courts can't just upend SCOTUS precedent"
/r/MensRights02/02/21 05:56 PM
25

...If you're a transgender man then your base biology is that of a woman. Science doesn't dispute this.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/20 06:30 PM
4

Studies aren't useful until peer reviewed and verified by other experts in the field. You should be looking for something that corroborates the study instead of accepting it at face value.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:00 PM
2

Can we get confirmation that it is, in fact, the UN distributing this?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 01:57 PM
1

Can you source this? A random jpg that says what you're saying is not actually a source.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:08 PM
2

Biology isn't the disadvantage. Legal standing is. Women get an additional right that men don't under the law. That needs to be corrected. I do not accept your suggestion that biology should give women special privileges.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 03:38 PM
3

The problem is that if only one parent does this, then the baby has only one parent and cannot be adopted because it still has the other parent. I'm not sure what the issue is here. You are all thinking you have a right to not have a kid, but no such right exists. Uh, yes it does. You're not obligated at any point to have children, I have the right to say "I don't want kids" and act on it. The issue we're having right now is that one gender is allowed to do this out of argument of personal auton…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 01:57 PM
14

It also makes sense that you need both parents consent to put the baby up for adoption. How else it would work? It's really easy. When the baby is born, both the mother and the father are required to sign a document if they want to claim parentage. Either or both may choose not to sign said document, but absent the signature, they have no rights to parentage. This solves both the issue of forced fatherhood at the woman's behest, and the problem you are bringing up. Adoption becomes the default a…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 11:38 AM
1

Uh, that's retarded. Her body is doing the incubation. The abortion process stops that entirely. It's still her body. This rhetoric doesn't actually work.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 11:31 AM
1

Can you link this?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 03:48 PM
0

False equivalency. Just because men are being denied proper agency doesn't mean women should be denied theirs. The answer here isn't "Restrict women's rights", it's "Bring men up to equal rights.". Anything less is bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:15 PM
4

Some people are lazy. Zero relevance Right back at you. "no u lol" "Gee doctor, I'm feeling stressed" "Say no more, let me get the scissors and vacuum." Not remotely how it happens. Learn how the real world operates. And it's difficult for me to process how utterly devoted to killing infants for mere convenience you people are and the sheer gusto with which you twist twist the truth and obfuscate in order to do so. I'm pro choice up until the third trimester but I'd put every last one of you in …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:27 PM
-1

Abortion access at any stage isn't extreme though. This bill is.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:20 PM
2

No, because feminist organizations routinely lobby for things that violate men's rights and freedoms. Having an issue with feminism on that ground makes it a concern of men's rights advocates.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 12:58 AM
2

I'm thoroughly enjoying you deny reality when primary sources are presented to you. Please continue, it's doing wonders for your cause.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:21 PM
1

I think it's a failing on your part to recognize that feminism has multiple meanings and usages. You don't just get to cherry pick one and say "well you guys don't get it!"
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:18 PM
3

And femists are against MRAs. And why are many women MRAs? The answer is simple. Because there is disagreement of how things are and what things are important and what needs to be addressed. Walking in and saying something as a surely and uselessly simplistic as "feminism = equality" doesn't get anyone anywhere. Preaching feminist talking points without sourcing them or accepting that there are people who are skeptical about their face value or the ways in which those talking points are raised, …
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:18 PM
2

If the definition was what you say, there wouldn't be a need to use the term "feminism" at all. You're clearly not posting in good faith.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:13 PM
5

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. You do know this, correct?
/r/MensRights19/12/18 03:54 PM
-2

I'd go a step further and say that there should be no parental obligation until you sign a form saying you accept it.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:04 PM
10

This is so beyond reality that I'm convinced you are completely delusional. This is not remotely the current state of affairs.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:15 PM
9

You're conflating past issues with present ones. Back when, yes you are right. That may have been the best way to financial freedom, and the most viable one to the point of calling it a necessity. It is not now, however. Married women with children are currently the target demographic for most businesses. Since women do not need to get married to have dependable income anymore, this should not be the case. But it is.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:12 PM
0

Have you not heard of price controls? Yes, it totally can.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:36 AM
0

You actually can't disconnect the issue because it's entirely reasonable to say a woman would abort the fetus because she couldn't support it, not because she isn't consenting to gestating it.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:08 PM
0

I already mentioned why. The scale of differences is too drastic to remotely be an accurate analogy.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 08:28 AM
1

The fact that a warrant of this nature was issued is the problem at hand. That shouldn't even be a legal option. Sure, they let it expire, but who the hell thought this was acceptable enough to request, let alone approve, a warrant to do? The fact that there's now legal precedent for this to happen is disgusting and unnerving.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:01 AM
0

It's invalid when the scale is so far off in difference as to misrepresent the issue at hand. Unless we're talking death in the hundreds of thousands and a violation of human rights that goes drastically into human experimentation that constitute torture, all done with an official denial of such events while going to war with other countries to spread a supremacist ideology, a nazi comparison is not remotely warranted.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:34 PM
1

Yes, but those laws are currently unenforceable. Keeping them on the books, though, would ensure that if the current trend of equality were to suddenly halt and reverse some, they'd be enforceable again
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:56 PM
-4

Could we not invoke Godwin's law, please?
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:54 PM
5

There are methodologies to law enforcement that are acceptable and moral and ones that aren't. Forcing a person to undergo sexual arousal in any context against their will is something I would class as immoral.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:53 PM
3

Agreed. Everyone should just file a report and move on.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 10:40 PM
27

The difference is in male feminists tend to vehemently prove they are feminists, on top of being the typical feminist you have already described. They have something to prove about themselves in that group, so they try way harder to make their beliefs known so that they don't feel like they might face ostracization from feminists.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:49 AM
10

It may have been. Frankly, I find the idea of the MRM becoming like this VERY disturbing.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:56 PM
6

Correct. Purple was an admin who blocked me. Tried submitting the last line, and found out I was banned. EDIT, no, sorry, I misread that. It's marked "deleted" as a default error message I believe. Topic is still in the group somewhere, and I was kicked out, unable to respond.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:27 PM
1

You know, ignoring the rest of everything, I absolutely love the ad hominem attacks here that you accused me of earlier. Except, y'know, unlike me you're attacking the person commenting rather than the basis of the opinion. Funny that.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:33 PM
1

Your defense was "I don't agree". No logical thought process whatsoever. My position lies solidly with the creator of the video. My text would basically have been rewriting what was stated there using slightly different wording, and that is simply a waste of time.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:27 PM
1

You came in making assertions on what we should be striving for based on nothing but your own conjecture on things that we have been actively working to debunk using evidence, with no counterevidence of your own aside from "Well I just don't agree with you". Burden of proof is on you, actually.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:04 PM
3

It's your job to source things and address points made if you want to argue your own. Everything else is pushing your opinions down our throats, quite honestly.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:46 PM
3

Right. And because you choose to disagree with them instead of show me how they may be flawed, using evidence, that tells me that your support of Sarkeesian is absolutely blind. There's nothing more to say about this because you are effectively "well my opinion is right because I say it is and you should take my opinion as self-evident of being correct." I have provided sources that use logic and reason, rather than conjecture and feeling, to counter this. Through the ENTIRE discourse on this th…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:22 PM
3

No. She just wants to create ridiculous arguments that the video game industry is there to "create your own patriarchal fantasy." Instead of something way less sinister and more like an actual business might actually do. Like turning a profit. If you paid attention to the linked video that THOROUGHLY tears apart EVERYTHING about "tropes vs women", you'd have caught this line about the Krystal one that is a "great example" Specifically, watch this segment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJeX6F-Q6…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:16 PM
3

Except her examples DON'T bear the weight of her argument. She creates straw-men and takes examples out of context. That's not an argument. That's logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:36 AM
2

I fixed the last one. And they're still way more sources than you've given to suggest affirmative action is "intuitive",
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:35 AM
3

Except...I just linked a whole other video that DECONSTRUCTS the quality of her arguments. Or are you just blatantly ignoring that and not addressing the counter-points?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:39 AM
3

There was surrounding context to the statement. I didn't just say "The point is stupid" and move on. I prefaced that with more. You're being AWFULLY picky about which sentences to read and apply. You didn't cite statistics. You actually cited...Absolutely nothing except "Name a female head of state". I challenge you then to show me all the women that have actually run and then give me rationale as to why they WOULD (rather than SHOULD) have won a race. There's WAY more to statistics than outcome…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:37 AM
3

After addressing things elsewhere, it's REALLY important that you understand something about Anita Sarkeesian. She launched a kickstarter in order to launch a series of YouTube videos that had "a lot of research" done in order to point out the "misogyny" in video games, which got her TONS of money. The result? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6p5AZp7r_Q Now, I do not know how familiar you are with video games. For the sake of keeping this comment brief and assuming a lack of knowledge for simpli…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:12 AM
2

That's not how it works from an egalitarian viewpoint. An egalitarian viewpoint is that all people have equal capacity and equal opportunity. This does not logically equate to equal results because there ARE differences in how men and women handle situations differently. I...Really can't even address this one as it is so far removed from ANYTHING at was said in the post you responded to. EDIT: I think I see better where you're coming from on that. But honestly, you're literally looking at half t…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:55 AM
1

I did not attack you, but rather your stance and the way your logic was heading. Nowhere did I call YOU anything personally. No, "The Patriarchy" is NOT a thing. It is not recognized as any type of phenomenon outside of feminist circles. It's NOT something you can legally tackle unless you want to go the Affirmative Action route, which is a VERY bad thing and each time it is used it does nothing but cause issues. Feminism DOESN'T fight for rights for women, it fights for women's privilege at the…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:47 AM
7

You really need to prove that feminism is "the other side of egalitarianism" as that argument holds no weight. This woman explains it pretty well MRAs aren't fighting to end male privilege OR female privilege. You're never going to be able to address that in laws. That's a stupid assumption to make on your part. We're fighting to end the legal and fundamental disparities in how men and women are treated. Unlike feminism, we are not worried about "overrepresentation by women" the way feminists ar…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:49 AM
2

You're confusing my opinion with theirs. If their opinion is that objectification is sexist and then practice what they are preaching is wrong, it is hypocritical. My opinion of whether or not it is wrong is irrelevant for their actions to be considered hypocritical.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 04:27 PM
5

Uhm...If they're going out and doing what they're saying is wrong and telling people not to do exactly what they're doing...How is that not a double standard?
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:16 PM
4

I see this argument all the time. Which women DO represent feminism?
/r/MensRights23/02/14 04:17 PM
2

Strictly speaking? No. But it shows the double standard of feminists whining about objectification - then going out and doing the exact thing they're saying is wrong and sexist.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 04:16 PM
3

That's pompous and arrogant. No, I am not a feminist. The word itself implies a predisposition towards assuming inequality for women, or otherwise advancing women up to and potentially exceeding the supposed advantage of being a man. Look up the word "egalitarian". THAT is what you are trying to apply here. Not feminism.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:45 PM
2

anyone that believes men and women are equal is, by definition, a feminist. Not true. I believe in that equality. I refuse to ever, EVER identify with, associate with, affirm, or otherwise promote feminism to any degree.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:03 PM
387

Guys, guys. This is one of those things to best call out, say "No, go away, get out, and stay out you horrible person" rather than to actually deliberate on. Someone like this is completely detrimental. Just call bullshit on it. If there's even a hint of "truth" (note that there is none in this, this is purely bullshit rhetoric) in the statement, expand on it and save it for later. Don't justify this shit.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 12:44 AM
1

I wasn't aware she was bisexual or genderqueer. She is actually a transexual?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 04:55 PM
4

You are, of course, assuming that "The Patriarchy" and "rape culture" exist as factual entities outside feminist circles.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 10:28 PM
0

Bigoted, anti-homosexual opinions are almost universally derived from Christian origins. Whether or not you specifically stated that you are coming from a religious standpoint, it is the nature of your argument.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 12:20 PM
3

Oh, I completely agree. I just wouldn't put them in the same category.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:18 AM
13

You're right, but that's one of the points where gay rights and men's rights conveniently overlap. Gay rights (and by extension lesbian, transgender, etc) cover a whole spectrum of things that the MRM doesn't, and vice-versa (We aren't about to go up and down the street in a pride parade with MRM signs, are we? =P) While the end-goal is the same (all people having the same rights), the problems each face happen to be entirely different in terms of where and how it's happening.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:05 AM
7

I broke it down into its lowest common denominator. It's not divisive. It's inclusive. You're dividing more than unifying, by excluding the potential possibility of relevance to his issue here.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:27 AM
12

As a homosexual man. Homosexual man. Man. Men's rights. Man. Or are you saying that he's not a man because of his homosexuality?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:17 AM
8

Exactly. And since he didn't do what you claimed he did...You stand by a lie.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:13 AM
14

It also would not have appeared if you had not typed it. He is not responsible for the words you type and submit. You are.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:10 AM
20

I fail to see how he was "shoving his gayness" to any extent. He asked a question about why the MRM pertained to him, which isn't unfair. You could try being helpful rather than vehemently aggressive.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:06 AM
50

This. I am a gay man as well. The MRM is a movement I support. The MRM focuses on a lot of things that affect men as a whole. These things include acknowledgement that rape can and does happen to men (And that's relevant to us because the help centers available are tailored to women - not men), that men commit more suicides than women, suffer from depression more, are assumed to be rapists, and that education is biased to favor women's success. Each of those affects you, as a man. Your sexual or…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 12:38 AM
7

It's not vandalism, strictly speaking, but it 100% violates W:NPOV. I hope that someone is bringing this up to Wiki staff, because this is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 11:05 AM
9

I'm personally offended at #24. As a gay man, I really don't like gay rights being equated to feminism. They are absolutely NOT related and should never be.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:09 AM
1

Then what would you suggest for men who don't want a chilld?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:15 PM
42

No, actually. This is a legitimate thing. It wasn't someone who wanted to see Taylor Swift, it was done to get some guy to ruin teenyboppers' dreams as some way of commenting about the awful music that mass media wants to stuff down peoples' throats or some shit. It's not an unfair report in this particular instance.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:51 AM
23

I'm curious. I've recently been arguing with multiple people that feminist groups are directly interfering with attempts to get men's rights recognized. If you could show me where NOW was fighting against it, I could prove an invaluable point with these people.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 12:14 PM
2

The question doesn't match the scenario. In your hypothetical situation, she would be a bad parent for shopping around to find someone who matched her beliefs, not for not doing what the first doctor told her to do. If she had done research and gotten a second opinion, and came to the conclusion that it still didn't need to be done, and then went looking around for another doctor that agreed with her because of the pressure, then no, not doing what her first doctor told her to do would be doing …
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:35 PM
11

I was circumcised. I can tell you right now that it's something I wish did not happen to me. I wish I knew what the full range of sexual feelings I'm supposed to have would have felt like. There is also an odd-shaped scar left over from the procedure, which did absolutely nothing beneficial for me whatsoever. There's no good reason that my parents did that to me, other than "Well, everyone does it and it's a religious/cultural thing, so..." Not good enough. If, for some reason, your son decides …
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:53 PM
3

Truthfully, there's almost no disparity between the statistics of men and women dying to the ratio of men and women who are firemen. The problem here is that the chances of fires happening where there are all-male units is statistically higher than mixed units. The numbers would be more evident of something awry if we had an even distribution of male/female firefighters. The numbers actually add up in this particular instance.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:00 PM
4

I've tried searching for anything that validates this story and I came up with literally nothing, Is there a better source for this?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 04:43 PM
4

If he gets punitive action for that, you deserve at LEAST as much for being an obnoxious troll. It's like you have nothing to do except prove how much of a misandrist you really are or something.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:30 PM
8

Beautiful. Please update us as more comes through!
/r/MensRights21/06/13 02:57 AM
3

I actually think this is the best idea, right here. Force them to either cope with what they're also dishing out, or force them to admit to a ludicrous double standard.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter