TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RobbenQC Archive

View 1 post and 147 comments by RobbenQC on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

RobbenQC/r/MensRights23/05/14 01:07 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Or so red pillers can red pill and PUAs can pick up chicks.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:42 PM
5

Very substantive. I'm not sure how else to explain this. On the first point, it's like conflating the American civil rights struggle with the struggle against Apartheid South Africa. Same problem, completely different circumstances. You wouldn't call Nelson Mandela an icon of the US civil rights movement. Second point, Malcolm X and Harvey Milk both fought through an unending stream of hatred, threats and violence for their respective causes. They're both historical icons for this reason and the…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:54 PM
5

You can't conflate struggles of women in say, the Islamic world, with feminism. That's an entirely different situation completely independent of circumstances in the west. Women's rights activists in those circumstances often reject western feminism for their own brand of equality which is more in line with their cultural and religious beliefs (they usually don't consider the dress codes for women oppressive for instance). Ecole was a homicidal rampage, I'm not sure how you can equate that with …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:44 PM
3

I am so proud of the MHRM today. The winds are changing gentlemen.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:49 PM
1

More in jest. It's a favourite of insane social justice warriors and if you visit /r/tumblrinaction you'll see what I mean.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:32 PM
3

See above.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:30 PM
8

It's true. Try to find a Malcolm X or a Harvey Milk or a John Brown equivalent. Feminists sometimes cite Emily Davison, but once again that's a case of rewriting history. They claim she laid down on an active horse racing circuit and allowed them to trample her for women's rights and is proclaimed a martyr to this day. However there is footage and plenty of articles from the time which say that she had women's rights flags on her person, and in the footage appeared to attempt to pin a flag to a …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:24 PM
2

Please refrain from using the word "problematic" - you could say it triggers me.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:10 PM
71

Someone once said (maybe Stardusk?) that MRA's are "on point" for the "manosphere". We're the public face which means we're just going to automatically bear the brunt of the nonsense, even when it's nothing to do with men's rights. Just look at the Elliot Rodger situation.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:37 PM
3

Have the organisers thought about contacting the press, as in bringing them in on it? It'd be great to have a journalist attending anyway to get an accurate idea of what the MRM is actually about - but if the feminists somehow manage to ruin it you'll have someone on hand to see it for themselves and tell the world the story.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:27 PM
8

No woman has ever died for feminism, a unique phenomenon among oppressed groups fighting for equality.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:22 PM
8

It's also possible that the hotel doesn't want to cause any hysteria by saying all of their staff and guests were threatened. If I were running the place I'd be concerned that this would scare away business, and lets remember that Detroit isn't doing very well at the moment. Who knows really, just speculation.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:20 PM
2

The issue with that is it isn't going to return. It's like saying lets bring back slavery (as an extreme example). Short of societal collapse to the point where women are left to completely fend for themselves, they're not going back to traditionalism en mass. That really is a pipe dream. The only other way I could see it return is if Islam really did take root in the west.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 04:54 PM
5

Even puritanical Christians think these people are insane.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:35 AM
1

That really was delicious, thanks for sharing.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 04:56 AM
-12

I don't even want a return to the days of traditionalism where every man got a wife (in theory). I think for humanity to move forward, both women and men should be completely free to do as they please. But I also think women need to start pulling their equal share of the weight (and by extension, take some of the load off the majority of beta drones), and we have a long way to go on that one. I suspect it might be some time before we see them out on the oil rigs and welding sewer pipes together …
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 04:53 AM
4

I don't usually indulge in this sort of nonsense but if every man on earth vanished for 24 hours, I wonder how the world would look. It'd be complete pandemonium. All of our technology, infrastructure, markets, systems - the very gears of civilization would grind to a halt. If every woman on earth vanished for 24 hours? We'd have take your kid to work day.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:38 PM
5

Fairly certAin exclusion and hatred towards men isn't the solution either, but feel free to shift blame from those in power to those who aren't... Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:46 PM
6

Exactly. If you're in a no-fault state, her cheating is completely irrelevant. Thank your local feminist.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 04:57 PM
8

I appreciate that she's at least attempting to point out that boys are people too, but what was with that whole ghastly picture of boys being preyed upon by one of the few male role models they actually have in gyms? Does anyone else think that was a preposterous scenario? The article discusses the lack of male role models and touches upon the assault on masculinity, then goes on to, assault masculinity? I suppose the solution is more female influence in bodybuilding culture.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:43 PM
3

Unfortunately you're just an ordinary member of the public who, for some reason, subscribes to feminist theory. I'm talking about left wing politicians, most of whom identify as feminists (thereby being primarily concerned with women's interests in these issues). The best we've heard from these people is that reform to these laws is somehow a danger to women and children. So as usual, men are deprived their rights. The conservatives vote for these bills more than any other, but they're not unifi…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:55 PM
9

4chan have been running a nonstop troll campaign on the #yesallwomen tag for about a week. I suspect they're behind this.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:40 PM
15

They pull this out all the time. "Don't you support equal/women's rights?" The next time that happens, point out that women have more rights in law than men do. This is an objective fact. Women have reproductive rights, men do not. Women have the right to bodily integrity, men do not. (Circumcision) Women have parental rights, men do not (they have obligations). Men are the only demographic in society who can be legally discriminated against, even when they are struggling or the minority (affirm…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 05:22 PM
2

You should film this and push the cops to prosecute them. I've seen some of the feminist "protests" at MRA related talks in Canada and their behaviour is completely unacceptable. These lunatics need to learn that there are consequences for behaving like an animal.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:51 PM
34

I agree. Feminism completely alienated me and I'm sure the same is true for many others. People don't respond well to being a scapegoat.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:30 PM
5

Feminists and the general left consistently block shared parenting bills, or bills which seek to reform child custody policy. Their reasons are still quite mysterious. A recent example.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:17 PM
21

I saw a great excerpt from someone on /b/ trolling tumblr posing as a lesbian "WoC" who went on to stir up the swarm by asserting that white women can't be raped, since rape is about power, and white women hold institutional power (similar arguments they make about men and rape). I actually cried. I wish I could find it.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:08 PM
2

Than the entire Anglosphere and probably most of Europe.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:03 PM
3

Really the feminists should be with us on this issue, and the fact that they're not is the greatest demonstration of hypocrisy you can hope for. They're all about getting rid of gender roles and prejudice, that's all we want to see here. I applaud the decision.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:01 PM
1

The divorce rate is around 50%. Between 70% and 90% of divorces are initiated by women depending on the area (college educated women tend to initiate the most). Men pay alimony and child support, lose the marital home and lose custody of children in the vast majority of cases (all of these statistics are in the side-bar). With custody, women have the power to estrange you from your own children and to forcibly remove you from your own home with abuse allegations. Marriage provides no benefits to…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:18 AM
1

You are discussing a hypothetical situation which has absolutely no bearing on this issue whatsoever. We're dealing with campus rape policy and how arbitrary, discriminatory and downright unfair it is. At the very least you're being downvoted for being offtopic.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 11:48 PM
12

Pretty sure those dudes who were forced to fight and die in countless horrific wars weren't having a party. We forget about them in the context of gender issues though, they were part of the patriarchy's glory days.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 11:42 PM
1

I'm really interested to see the arguments against bills like this. I can never seem to find them. I have no idea what the liberal or feminist argument is on this issue. I don't even know what we're meant to be debating. It just all gets quietly shot down without mention in the news.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:48 PM
14

All of this is inconsequential. Men as autonomous human beings reserve the right to impose any conditions they see fit on their mate selection preferences. Women are notorious for their laundry list of qualities they seek in men, we're allowed to refuse to marry promiscuous/overweight/obnoxious/etc women if we please. Considering divorce rates, and considering the fact that the vast majority of divorces are initiated by women - promiscuity seems like a very reasonable factor to consider when sel…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:05 PM
1

The difference here is kindness from within, because you have a genuine desire to be kind or show compassion towards someone else - and kindness to seek approval (specifically from women). If you catch yourself doing favours for women because you're attracted to them, you're being a beta.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 03:41 PM
18

I'm a law student, and I actually think it'd be possible in our world of gynocentric court systems. I'd make an equitable estoppel claim (mother made a financial decision on the basis of the father's promise). This would never work for any man, but a sobbing woman in court? Anything's possible. We've seen complete double standards for this sort of thing as high as the supreme court.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 02:20 PM
19

What gets me about the whole "teach men to x" approach, aside from how ludicrously insulting it is, is that women dominate teaching positions and are the vast majority of custodial parents - thanks to feminism's influences in family law and the rise of paedophile hysteria thanks to feminist theory (toxic masculinity). Men aren't teaching kids anything these days, we're afraid to be around them, but still this shit is somehow our fault and our responsibility.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 12:57 PM
8

Patriarchy, the conspiracy theory that blames all men for women's problems. Even the ones they create for themselves.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:42 PM
2

Even if it was said by an MRA, which cannot be verified and at best was deleted; in context it's just an abrasive comment which isn't PC enough for their liking. He's referring to affirmative action, where women are given a quota of jobs/scholarships/benefits/grants for no other reason than the fact that they're women. Even in areas of life where women doing significantly better than men. Bitterness at that injustice is not an example of misogyny. It's an example of anger towards unfair discrimi…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:08 PM
9

This school needs to be sued into liquidation.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:56 PM
1

I defer to your superior knowledge. Didn't realise sperm was so resilient.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 02:34 PM
1

Whether they're rejected by the feminist hive mind or not, there is a lot of literature on PUA sites written by self described feminists. Their only motive as a PUA is to improve social techniques to attract women. There is nothing political in what they're trying to do, if anything it's a self improvement movement. The argument being had is that a lot of men share some of his core beliefs. Obviously, he extruded those beliefs to the point where he considered the only course of action was to mur…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:11 PM
6

Faith in humanity momentarily restored. This whole thing is a shit storm, but any publicity is good publicity. There are going to be a few reasonable individuals like this one who will take the time to research and judge us for themselves - and that'll only swell our numbers in the end. This person appeared to be your typical "feminist by default" and immediately recognised the merit in what we're actually advocating. Thanks for sharing some good news.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:00 PM
5

This is probably fiction but destroying your used condoms is excellent advice and should become common practise for men. Most people keep antibacterial handwash in their bathrooms, I'd bet even that'd do it if your local tobasco laws are prohibitive.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 03:05 PM
7

You cannot reason with these people. This is the result of years of indoctrination and you're not going to undo it in a debate on facebook. Some women's entire worldview is dictated by feminist theory, just like a religious person. You just have to decide how much you value your principles, and if you're willing to lose friends over them. I personally am, I have no time for bigots.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:35 PM
29

How can you hope to fix a systematic social inequality if you won't acknowledge that the institution was implemented by, and is preserved by, the Illuminati. Do you see the issue here? Your belief structure is based around an unfalsifiable hypothesis which can be used to explain practically anything. It explains all ways in which women are disadvantaged, and all ways in which men are disadvantaged. It also somehow explains how both parties are advantaged and it can never be held to scrutiny by a…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:02 AM
11

I'm almost ashamed to admit that it'd work on me as well. Sad that even those of us that are aware of these boundaries are still influenced by them. I think the systematic destruction of male only spaces in the name of "toxic masculinity" is a big contributor to this as well.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:40 AM
12

Did you at least get some of our privilege on loan?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:11 AM
12

Far be it from us to defend PUA's, techniques on being successful with women have absolutely nothing to do with men's rights. Many PUA's are actually fucking feminists. But for the love of christ go and read what they actually advocate before attacking a strawman in our clothing. Elliot Rodger frequented anti-PUA sites like puahate.com and a place called Wizardchan. Despite all of this, his beliefs are immaterial by virtue of the inescapable fact that they are the beliefs of a deeply disturbed a…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:46 AM
5

Literally just examples of hysterical women. As others have said, she needs to pull up her big girl pants and grow up.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:56 PM
27

Third wave feminists have this Pavlovian tendency to demonstrate projection in their nonsensical rantings. As others have said, there is a huge difference between entitlement and desire. If most men felt entitled to women's bodies, we'd just be raping them en mass, and clearly that isn't the case. If you're entitled to something, you just take it. No, in stead we have the PUA industry, the bodybuiding community, even TRP is all about figuring out what women want, how they work, and how to meet t…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:38 PM
2

Literally spouse support within a marriage. Usually upon separation. Some jurisdictions allow this but I don't think it's done in the anglosphere.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 12:48 PM
6

It feels like the only way to deal with this is to walk around with a hidden camera attached to you at all times. Utterly pathetic state of affairs. Maybe we should start a "Teach girls not to hit" campaign?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:30 PM
61

Good christ. I'm not American but I thought the fat thing was humorous exaggeration. Clearly I was wrong.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 10:29 PM
58

What irritates me the most about most of our opponents is the complete misunderstanding or misrepresentation of what the MRM actually is. We're conflated with every imaginable male circle, even the fricken bodybuilding community. The MRM isn't even ideological, we don't have fucking tenants or theories or a single unified opinion on gender relations. We just care about addressing the mistreatment of our gender in the law and contesting the double standards in the feminist monologue.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:16 PM
9

Too add to this, the information is still floating around /b/ amongst all the bullshit they post, but much of it was drawn from puahate.com where he posted under the username "Elliot Rodger". I'm not sure if the mods there have tried to pull a coverup job to save themselves the negative publicity, but anyone interested could search his post history. They found his facebook as well which only really demonstrated his extreme narcissism. He had photos of himself labelled "Damn, I look good." etc bu…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:17 PM
15

Stop being such a bigot. If you care to investigate his youtube channel and his posts on PUA forums you'll see he had a hatred of both women for the type of men they were attracted to (for their actions) and those men for what they were, and that they were successful where he failed. Nowhere in his uncovered internet history does he even mention tumblrite gender identity nonsense, he specifically hated "alpha" males. The sort of man at the very top of your privilege scale.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:13 PM
9

He held the "alpha" men he perceived women went for with equal contempt; labelling them as "barbarians" and "brutes". In one post on a PUA forum he frequented, he talked about a hypothetical situation of releasing a virus which killed all other men on earth so that he could have his pick of women.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:06 PM
4

Assuming you're unfamiliar, that's how 4chan works. Threads 404 after a point. If you're not easily offended (and certainly not at work), just peruse boards.4chan.org/b/ for another incarnation of the thread. They've been covering it all day. I'm sure /pol/ has something going too.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 09:12 PM
3

http://boards.4chan.org/b/thread/547838331
/r/MensRights24/05/14 07:44 PM
16

4chan has dug up his youtube account and his posts on PUA forums. The guy was quite clearly disturbed and suffering from some kind of narcissistic delusion. Other posters on one PUA site were telling him to get help. One poster from Norway ironically quoted him a few months ago with the reply: "Inb4 next mass shooting". This has absolutely nothing to do with his beliefs (which are incongruent even with TRP philosophy), this has everything to do with a deeply disturbed individual losing his shit.…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 07:17 PM
6

They're a bunch of hysterical women creating drama for themselves. At least it's entertaining.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:48 PM
2

This isn't even anything to do with the PUA community which he was involved in. The guy was a psychopath and he lost it. Twisting mental illness to political ends is typically despicable.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:14 PM
2

I think we need to start blindfolding judges in criminal trials. Justice isn't blind enough for my liking.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:09 PM
1

Interesting facts, but I do think we maintain that distinction even though we use the same word. "Love you like a brother" is different to how you'd love a partner or a child. Everyone understands that, but it is a shame we lost some of the complexity in the language in English.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:41 AM
2

I can't even believe this is legal. The police and the courts have a monopoly on criminal matters for a reason. I honestly don't see how these college "tribunals" are any different from vigilante justice.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:23 AM
1

I was looking for that myself. Thank you for finding the case citation.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:20 AM
2

The college hasn't done anything wrong. They received a complaint and investigated it, and thankfully dropped it when it turned out to be nonsense. Only the girls acted maliciously here by abusing the system to punish the OP for not bending to their demands.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:27 PM
4

I know a male teacher who is retraining as an electrician right now, he's in his 40's and decided he can't deal with the environment any more. He's the only male teacher at his school.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:03 PM
4

Didn't they once use terms like "people of colour" back in colonial times in a less than respectful manner? I'm European and I'd never refer to a black person (or any other race) like that, it just sounds really demeaning. It's almost clinical. I just find the evolution of the liberal language on these things quite interesting.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:12 PM
12

Totally agree. I think the "misogyny" witch hunts are just a huge form of projection, or at least a deflection tactic. Your average man is pretty likely to literally risk his own life to save a female stranger if she were in trouble. It happens every single day, but apparently the hatred of women is rampant.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:23 AM
15

Math above secondary (highschool) level literally scares the shit out of a lot of girls. When you get to the stage where it's beyond memorising and following procedures and actually thinking in mathematical (and logical) terms, they don't want to even attempt it.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:10 AM
5

The truth about this is that someone has to pay for these fucking kids. An egalitarian and fair system would either make it everyone's right to choose when they become parents, or everyone's obligation to look after any kids they produce. Right now we have women's rights, men's obligation and that isn't going to change without taking away "choices" from women (never going to happen). Someone has to pay for women's choices, and it's always going to be us. Even men who never have kids nor marry ar…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 06:18 PM
6

That is pretty much how it used to work and the feminists put a lot of effort into getting rid of that system.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 06:09 PM
13

I hope he sued everyone.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:00 PM
9

The same phenomenon exists in countries where female genital mutilation exists, often the victims of it are the most vocal supporters of the practice and even perform it on others. I suppose it's a form of denial.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:58 PM
6

She's got to be trolling?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:55 PM
3

Do not get married under any circumstances. It provides no benefits to men beyond keeping an ordinary girlfriend, and comes with absurd risks.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 12:01 AM
10

Haha, so friendzone them?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:25 PM
2

I noticed this too years ago. It's a fun exercise you can get BP friends to do; you can learn a girl's life story without revealing a thing about yourself quite easily, because she'll never ask.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:53 PM
68

This. Sue everyone. It seems you've run into a vindictive man hater with no qualms about abusing the absurdly biased system to its full potential, so it's time to go to war. You can't let this stand, and it will come back to haunt you if you do. Get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:42 AM
2

Feminism seems to have more subsects than Christianity these days. If you don't need to believe in the patriarchy to be a feminist, then what distinguishes them from egalitarians? If it's simply a belief in equality as these people claim, then why call it feminism at all?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:18 PM
9

The majority of women didn't have it great, but they were well protected compared to the trifles of men, mainly when it came to war and disaster. "Women and children first" - fuck the men, they just went down with the ship and were happy about it. Women weren't conscripted, husbands were made suffer the punishments for crimes and debts of their wives. In any period in history, I'd have rather been a woman than a man. Women have always been valued and protected just for being women, the whole cod…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:33 PM
2

Hopefully these white knights aren't all talk, lets call it natural selection at work.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 11:22 AM
19

By what measurement? The Titanic sunk in 1912, a couple of years before the first world war, where millions of men were FORCED to fight and horrifically die in conditions which could only be described as hell on earth. And women shamed the men that refused to go, before they were executed. Men have always, always had it worse historically because they are the disposable gender. Stop comparing women to the elite classes of men, compare women to the majority of men who were work horses and cannon …
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:53 AM
34

And yet we hear about how low women's self esteem is. They all seem to think they're entitled to apex alphas!
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 11:51 PM
42

That episode is a perfect illustration of the level of mental gymnastics we're talking about here. This is the feminist have-it-all fairytale they've all been sold since childhood. Slut it up when you're high SMV, go to college to get a degree you'll never use, the settle down and marry a beta provider to pay your debts and provide for you and your children - then divorce him for everything he has if you get bored. It's the golden ticket and the men involved are just actors with a part to play i…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 11:47 PM
45

It isn't a joke, this isn't a serious example but it illustrates the paradigm we're dealing with. As mentioned, it's the same with violence. Female violence is often justified as "he deserved it", when the reverse is never (rightly) acceptable. This perpetual victim status feminism has fostered needs to be challenged.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:15 PM
8

Can't knock them for this. Everything about women is some form of deception, but thank fuck they put the effort in.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 01:12 AM
1

So you're saying legal and de-stigmatised prostitution wouldn't crash the price of pussy? It's pretty cheap to hire a hooker already, especially compared to the average date, and definitely compared to marriage. Edit: by the "sisterhood" I mean women as a collective. They artificially keep the price high in their own way, one of them is by slut shaming and opposing prostitution. Women don't like sluts because it cheapens pussy.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 11:25 PM
9

A lot of people aren't even aware that the word "misandry" exists (even our browser spell checks). I thank her for spreading awareness.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:45 PM
7

They're just pushing for legislation to force cohabitants into defacto marriage. Already in place in Canada and Australia. Their argument is that it's unfair that men can just walk out on women and leave them with nothing provided they never commit to them in writing, so they should be entitled to alimony and half your shit if they've lived with you. This isn't to do with child support, that's a different issue, they're just angry that they can't pillage your wealth if you're smart enough to ref…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 09:34 PM
3

I'd never be stupid enough to marry, but if I knew someone who was being railroaded by a woman in divorce court I'd advise him to torch his assets and donate everything to charity. He's losing everything anyway, so may as well introduce a scorched earth policy.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 09:25 PM
1

One can either get indigent about it, or one can remember 4chan exists.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:59 PM
1

The Sith were pretty RP.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 05:41 PM
2

I disagree, the price of pussy is artificially inflated by the sisterhood. Look at the huge debate going on in feminist circles over prostitution at the moment, a woman's dominion over her own body is coming into conflict with the price fixing of sex and causing a bit of a commotion. Pussy isn't a physically scarce resource, it's just regulated by the fucking female Fed.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 05:18 PM
1

This is an example of female solipsism.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:01 PM
7

Yes, don't get married. Why should you? What does it change aside from giving your partner the power to unilaterally ruin you at a moments notice? You should be afraid of marriage because the dangers of divorce court are very real. It's entirely pointless in this day and age and provides no benefits over keeping an ordinary girlfriend, but comes with absurd risks. If it works for you, I hope that continues for your sake, but you're pretty much saying smoking doesn't cause cancer because you're f…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:15 PM
9

That's the job of the justice system. If you take a woman at her word whenever they claim rape you're perpetrating the problem. I don't accept allegations as the truth until they're proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:38 PM
3

All that rape crisis shit you mention there, well they need to justify their own existence to get the funding from the government which provides the gender studies majors working there with jobs. See where the incentive for this whole "rape culture" myth is coming from? It's the same story with domestic violence and child abuse. It's called the "abuse industry". They invented the problem to sell the solution.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 12:10 AM
0

When that bubble bursts you know we (men) are going to be blamed for it.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:59 PM
14

They actually start to rewrite the events of your relationship history to make you seem abusive and evil. Seems every women describes their ex as abusive in some form or another. I used to walk around thinking every guy is an abusive asshole in their relationships, but now I know it's just the hamster.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 10:18 AM
3

What we do is some preprogrammed irrational bullshit, it's called the Blue Pill. The point of TRP as a philosophy is to recognise your nature and to overcome it.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 04:25 AM
1

I don't have the information at hand but they went to absurd lengths to encourage more women into science and engineering fields and more men into more "feminine" fields and it was a complete failure. I remember watching a documentary (subtitled) on youtube about it and even the feminists who instigated the policy were admitting defeat. They're really wrapped up in the feminist madness in Scandinavian countries.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 04:17 AM
2

Rape shield law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_shield_law
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 04:09 AM
22

It always amazes me how a lot of women feel the need to announce their gender online. They can't seem to help it. It's so telling that they feel the need to do this when we're constantly told that it's so hard to be a woman in the real world on account of all the invisible oppression. The anonymous internet is their opportunity to be treated like a man, to be judged entirely on the merits of what they say rather than what they are, and I don't think they like it much at all. It's not easy withou…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 03:22 AM
11

I see your point but assuming this guy read the situation correctly, she was literally using him as a meal ticket. This is a popular trick for young women these days, finding some guy online and making him buy you an expensive dinner when you have absolutely no intention of dating him or even having a fling. She probably intended to leave and meet up with some Alpha after dinner. Fuck. That. Shit. If I found myself in such a situation I'd make her pay for my dinner too, call it poetic justice.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 02:00 AM
11

"Rape speak" - I really hope the feminists start using that one. I won't be able to keep a straight face.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 11:06 PM
14

This is good for us, let them continue to alienate people.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:24 PM
5

This is going to continue to happen so long as we let feminists hold positions of power, especially in social work. Men account for the vast, vast majority of the homeless, and we're still giving more resources to women.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:22 PM
24

The Norwegians tried this and it failed miserably. I'm only annoyed because it's a futile waste of taxes.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:12 PM
1

This is just biology, women are their most attractive in this age range as these are their optimal child bearing years.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:49 PM
11

If we could DNA test every child in the country right now, I have a feeling the number would be a bit higher than 10-15%. The amount of women who seem to see no problem with cuckoldry is harrowing.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 07:07 AM
33

This is the big elephant in the room. Women have always hated prostitutes because they lower the price of sex, and make no mistake, all women are prostitutes in one form or another. You're always going to pay for pussy. Women do the slut shaming (but we get blamed for it). If prostitution were legalised and normalised, women lose their sexual power over men and we can't have that. I think it's only a matter of time before this happens because we're purposefully putting prostitutes at risk by kee…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 06:30 AM
1

This site is bitter red pill.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 06:00 AM
13

There is nothing psychopathic about this woman, this is hypergamy unchained in all its glory. It's just her nature.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 05:48 AM
3

It's like diagnosing schizophrenia as a demonic possession and recommending exorcism as treatment. The problem is they bring feminism, which is an ideology (based around women) into an all male problem and insist on reframing the issue to fit into their Marxist ideological paradigm. This needs to change.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 05:09 AM
-1

Are you purposefully missing the point? It is completely inconclusive, but it's being positively asserted to the tune of $50 million. Some studies suggest it helps prevent HIV, others suggest it helps cause HIV. It is clearly unethical to advise people in third world countries to amputate parts of their bodies on something we haven't proven either way, by telling them that it'll help them when it may not. That is what is going on here. We're telling them that it's a FACT that circumcision reduce…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 08:47 PM
3

You've inspired me, I'll give it a shot. That money could be spent on proper sex education or perhaps condoms which really do help prevent HIV.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 08:37 PM
4

If you look at his references you'll see the peer reviewed material. The argument is that circumcision as a means to prevent HIV transmission is dubious at best, and is being presented as fact in Africa. He correctly points out that the original study which makes this assertion is absurdly biased to almost rig the results.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 08:30 PM
3

That's a very interesting point. There was a thread on askwomen (I think) asking about the prevalence of rape in female erotica. The hamsters called it "ravishment" as opposed to "rape" when objectively there was no difference between the two, except that the female character secretly desired it in the former. It was a very insightful read into female sexuality.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 08:15 PM
0

This is a good article to start on the history of medical excuses for circumcision and it provides citations. It's a scandal. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-a-rizvi/male-circumcision-and-the_b_249728.html
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:59 PM
9

Please stop perpetrating this myth. This is heavily disputed and there are many studies showing that circumcision increases the risk of HIV transmission. Condoms are the only reliable means of preventing HIV transmission. This whole argument sounds as ridiculous to me as pre-emptively amputating a woman's breasts to prevent breast cancer.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:43 PM
12

I knew that rape was wrong long before I was ever sexually active and nobody had to teach it to me. Just like I knew killing people was wrong, or did your parents have to spell that out to you when you were a kid? These campaigns are both futile and offensive and they're part of the reason why men are labelled as predators by default. Why we're now afraid of being near children and why society won't trust us. Do you think similar campaigns to curb murder or theft would have even the slightest ef…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:34 PM
2

The FBI break it down to all sorts of categories for their own reasons but all the data is there. The point is that women are at most risk of being raped between the ages of 14 and 30, or their sexual prime. The chances of being raped as an elderly woman is statistically tiny, oddly enough this is the most vulnerable age a woman can ever be outside of infancy. This contradicts the feminist position that male on female rape is predominantly about power, it suggests that it is probably about sex. …
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:09 PM
3

I agree in principle but the current situation is that mothers have rights, fathers have responsibility and that is unacceptable. The goal is parity.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:57 PM
3

National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) - About 80% of rape victims were under age 30--about half of these were under age 18. Victims younger than 12 accounted for 15% of those raped, and another 29% of rape victims were between 12 and 17. http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/index.html
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:41 PM
16

The ridiculous radfem and SJWs on Tumblr deserve the title. I see no issue with mocking these bigoted idiots, just like I'd mock the Klan.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:26 PM
4

I don't accept that. Why then do male rapists not target the elderly, disabled or other vulnerable groups much more often like any predator? Why don't they target other vulnerable males? The overwhelming majority of female rape victims are women in their sexual prime. That's some coincidence.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:08 PM
41

So you're literally a paedophile apologist. I'm done with this discussion.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:32 AM
6

Because women are excessively coddled. The pussy pass is getting beyond a joke, women are seemingly above the law now. In fact in the UK the feminists have dispensed with all pretences and recommended that the government abolish women's prisons altogether. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13666066 The judge is speaking as if she's the victim here, she RAPED an 8 year old boy repeatedly. 50 times in fact. Imagine an adult male doing this to an 8 year old girl. This is more of an MRA issue but good ch…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 02:06 AM
58

I hope you're being sarcastic. 16 is the age of consent in the UK, this boy was 8 years old. How would you feel about a 16 year old guy fucking an 8 year old girl? Is that rape to you?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:50 AM
3

They also think the word "compromise" means "do what I want." Ask any married man.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 11:00 PM
298

We need to stop with this language of "woman had sex". She raped him. She raped an 8 year old boy 50 times.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:38 PM
11

They only know how they want to feel.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:37 PM
9

My comment was clearly hyperbole.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 12:50 AM
16

It demonstrates hypergamy perfectly and illustrates that we have completely different approaches to mate selection, which contradicts feminist dogma.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 10:30 PM
135

I found that little fact more interesting than his actual findings. Now we know how Galileo felt, dogma trumps science and the religion of our age is feminism.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 10:20 PM
5

Hypergamy isn't restricted to American females, it's universal. The fantasy this man had in his mind doesn't exist any more; and it only exited in the past because women had no choice but to restrain their hypergamy or go without provision. He should relax and enjoy his money.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 05:22 PM
3

Do you have a citation for that "forced to penetrate" statistic? Not that I don't believe you it's just something I didn't know.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:20 PM
7

It's really sinister how they've managed to conflate gender equality, an idea most people can get behind, with feminism. I'm sure we've all heard the argument; "If you believe in equality you're a feminist." Excuse me, but fuck you. Feminism doesn't have a monopoly on equality. You can believe in equality whilst rejecting this ideology and its absurd theories. Don't let them pull this trick. It's like saying all it takes to be a Christian is to believe in God.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:14 PM
3

Literally cellular rape.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 02:35 AM
9

This belongs on /r/tumblrinaction to be mocked, not debated seriously.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 10:32 PM
1

You realise that everything that makes you, "you", is just essentially chemicals? What chemicals you happen to have determines your gender, or else trans people wouldn't even exist because it wouldn't matter - they'd be the same either way. You're just taking an existentialist position on biology.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:06 PM
3

It is simply my view that going to war with feminism is a waste of energy, but gender specific issues do not need to be a militant war of attrition. We should be better than that, better than the feminists and tumblerians obsessed with their collective persecution complex and rape fantasies. In this instance, we can campaign and lobby to outlaw circumcision; feminists need not be mentioned nor consulted for their opinion. They are irrelevant when it comes to male issues as they've already proven…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:25 AM
44

Feminists are playing a zero-sum game, you cannot reason with them because they are too invested in the male oppressor/female oppressed paradigm. It's no different to the psychology behind cults or religious fanatics. I prefer to focus my energy on improving the situation for men, rather than trying to convince the bigot not to be bigoted. It isn't our responsibility to help these people.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:32 PM
4

I made an account to let you know that you don't have to live with this condition if you're willing to put some time into fixing it. There is a community of men out there who are successfully restoring their foreskins by inducing cellular mitosis (cell division) by stretching what little of their foreskin remains. If you look at the skin just below your glans (the head) you'll notice it's a slightly different shade of colour and more sensitive when you run your finger across it. That is what's l…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter