TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RockingMrE Archive

View 10 posts and 38 comments by RockingMrE on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It doesn't.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 05:30 AM
4

I appreciate your feedback. But I think mentioning fallacies without being specific is less helpful. For a 15 minute video, I think I provided as much context as I could. Breaking topics down into a series that covers various aspects over time is often more digestible. For example, I mentioned the intro to the Golden Mean video here.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 09:36 PM
3

Isn't that what I suggested, though?
/r/MensRights04/07/26 08:36 PM
0

So sad, and all too common in this day and age.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:24 AM
3

Thanks for your help, though I actually think I am unable to post now on reddit from this account thanks to his meddling. Maybe you could help me find out if this is the case...
/r/MensRights11/01/12 08:08 AM
1

You are an ideologue. You have no place talking about this topic - you are no better than a creationist. Spare me the agnotological propaganda. You are also too intellectually lazy to give a damn about the truth. You just let feminist theory drip it into your weak minded brain. You've rotted your sense of critical understanding. Don't comment to me again - I wont be listening to your crap any longer. You are a waste of the oxygen you breath.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 08:13 AM
2

That's why the blog has scientific studies from professors and university departments. Utterly deluded. Spare me the nonsense.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 12:33 PM
1

NOTE: I have already posted this once today and it was very quickly downvoted four times to counter the positive upvotes. It appears there are people coming onto this subreddit who do not want people to understand that gender is largely biological. It is at the heart of feminist theopry and these poeple appear to loath the modern research that proves them wrong. I experienced the same tactics when I posted a video on this topic. Despite the very positive feedback ideologues targeted it and voted…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 11:18 AM
4

Wanted to make a post stating that gender deniers have repeatedly attempted to vote down my posts on this topic. This blog clearly demonstrates solid research showing that gender is largely biologically influenced. Please crosspost and repost this blog so that others can see it. It has already been voted down, no doubt by feminist theory ideologues' who cannot tolerate modern research in this area being shown. All help would be most appreciated.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 11:06 AM
3

The gender deniers have voted down the post now. No one will see it. They did it with my video about this topic too. Absolute cowards.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 11:04 AM
1

Ha! Nice to meet you. Check out my channel some time :-)
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:44 AM
1

I agree there are physical restrictions, but there is more to it than that. If women physically can't do them then why would they want to? The fact is that the whole hunter/gatherer topic shows that men and women did evolve to carry out different tasks more naturally, something that feminist theory will not accept. Well I'm certainly not saying that guys can't be assholes from time to time. The problem we have today is that feminism and their enablers have really ruined the setting where genuine…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:28 PM
1

I'm not sure what we are disagreeing on. The on-the-job fatalities are far higher for men than women. You will find that women, out of choice, simply do not want to work in dangerous jobs most of the time. They choose safer ones, like working in offices, schools and hospitals. The jobs that men are injured or die in are all the jobs women don't do. It is an invisible issue because if 90% of on-the-job fatalities were women, of whatever class, the political will would almost certainly be there to…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 02:54 PM
2

I've heard of this before. It is something worth looking into. No doubt I will do that in the future and possibly put the info into a vid.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 02:41 PM
2

I'd just like to add that yes, men and women DO benefit from safer environments in work, but the fact still remains that it is in areas where men AND women work that safety has increased the most. It is for this reason, as well as men still doing the most dangerous jobs, that men die far more in work than women.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 02:24 PM
1

Our daughter doesn't go to daycare, we decided it would be best to try to keep her home until she was three. There is however very little, if any, support for stay-at-home dads, which is a stark contrast from mothers, who have a mountain of support and are easily accepted into many daytime communities. It is for this reason that I spend a lot of time online - it helps to keep me busy. One thing I will say is that the people at the local doctor's surgery acted as though it was novel that a man co…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 01:16 PM
5

All good points. What is important in this issue is that we break down the famale as perpetual victim and male as permanent oppressor rhetoric. It is destructive, and is anything but egalitarian in the mindset it generates.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 11:06 AM
3

Thank you for your comment. For the record I am a "dadpreneur" - a father who works from home, spending a lot of time looking after his daughter while his wife works.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 11:03 AM
3

Disclaimer - I will not interact with those who are coming at this topic from a Feminist Theory perspective because it only seems to result in passive and overt aggression - it is a waste of my time and energy. Those wishing to make genuine comments involving the agnotological falsities and biases involved in supporting patriarchal history are more than welcome to ask questions and comment. Thank you for visiting this post :-)
/r/MensRights30/12/11 10:24 AM
0

It's ridiculous, and it really shows what we have to deal with to get our message across. Then these people have the audacity to wonder why we get sick of their tactics being thrown at us ad nauseum.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:01 AM
-7

Using hair (of all things) to describe how gender is a social construct is the type of absurd argument I have heard from gays and trans completely lost to the very leftist nonsense I refute in this vid. Let me clarify for the last time before I finish here; fashion is NOT biology. If you can't make the distinction and respect the scientific data that clearly demonstrates how biology predominently shapes society then you are not what you advertise yourself to be - you are an ideologue of gender t…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 09:57 PM
0

Where do I begin? I think I'd rather have a nice xmas drink than deal with such tripe. Actually...
/r/MensRights25/12/11 08:16 PM
-1

You really aren't grasping this topic at all are you? Culture, society, and everything inbetween is based on a projection of biology. Safe societies are more egalitarian, though evolutionary traits are always prevalent in human behaviour. That's why people who sprout social construct, like a boy crying wolf, get so frustrated when men and women don't sing to the hymn sheet of their flimsy theories.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 06:50 PM
2

Majored in this material? Let me guess - some sort of Gender Studies based humanities or female-centric aspect of psychology? If you call taking evidence from scientific data radical, as opposed to philosophical bullshittery and highly questionable sample data that's dubiously interpreted, then guilty as charged.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 06:45 PM
-6

You've got it in one. It gets very frustrating to keep hearing the same circular reasoning over and over again while these people ignore the scientifically sound and basically irrefutable evidence showing that hormones are dominant in gender, and thus biology is impossible to ignore in the historical context of human history. I guess this doesn't fit the victimology meme though.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 06:11 PM
0

Gender is an interpretation of self, which is an interpretation of biology. Society can only evolve when nature allows us to. Modernity allows us to bypass the restrictions of nature, and thus we can move away from gender roles. We're one disaster away from hunter/gatherer societies so we can survive.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 05:54 PM
-7

The left is pervasive and incessant in spreading ideas of social construction. Read some leftist philosophy and you will see this clear as day. Look up Postmodernism. Yes, there is a major scientific element to this topic but it gets hijacked by political ideologues, which is very sad indeed.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 05:51 PM
-1

Circular? Is that what you call providing a scientifically sound argument proving that hormones are what develop gender behaviour? They do not simply "originate in society." There is mountains of evidence to prove this, cutting edge too, and I have tried many times to open the eyes of certain people, who simply refuse to accept anything but their own leftist (yes, leftist) inspired drivel. But it's a waste of time once the social construct barrier goes down. It would be more prudent to bang one'…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 05:44 PM
-21

I think you are suffering from cognitive dissonace to say the least. I most certainly did not say, or even suggest, that only effeminate men can be homosexual. You completely misrepresented my views in the video. I will not waste my time explaining to you why because I suspect intellectual dishonesty. Furthermore I will not continue to repeat ad nauseum why this understanding of gender is not absolute. It only becomes absolute when survival becomes difficult.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 05:26 PM
-11

Actual studies? That is what your ilk repeatedly cite. And yet your peer reviewed "studies" are all taken out of laughable left-wing humanities tripe in unviersities, like Women's Studies. If I told you the professor and his studies, none of it would make a bit of difference, though I repeatedly keep saying that people like you should check out Simon Baron Cohen of Cambridge University - a leader of this field. Also, check out Professor Gaad Saad. However, anyone that denies hormones strongly af…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 03:10 PM
2

There are things that are socially constructed in some regards, but they are all driven by biology. Women strive to look pretty because it gets them results in a competitive environment, and men get results by being good providers, or physically strong. Every aspect of our society, however big or small, is driven by our internal evolutionary psychology and physicality. None of this is fatally deterministic, but it becomes dominant if surival pressure is put upon us. The silly thing is that trans…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 03:02 PM
3

The fact is that brain chemistry and other bodily chemical functions ARE directly affiliated with masculine and feminine traits. Here's a simple example; I pump your body with testosterone and you will see a noticeable change in hair growth, visual/spatial ability, and muscle development. I pump you full of estrogen and you will notice heightened emotional behaviour (like women during enstruation), loss of hair, and a higher voice. Why do you think body builders (male AND female) take steroids? …
/r/MensRights25/12/11 02:49 PM
3

I suppose the Iron Maiden t-shirt means that I can't read and internalise scientific data.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 02:40 PM
1

Without more information and more specific detail about you it is not possible to scientifically answer your claim.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 01:01 PM
6

Who ever said that society doesn't have an influence on us? The point is that society is largely a reflection of biology, not the other way around. Of course there are times when society can put pressure on us, but this is also affiliated with biological survivalism. Men being "macho" was an important part of human development throughout history, and women being "nurturers" was also essential. As humanity has transformed it has become possible for people to relax this biological reality. You wan…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:26 AM
6

I see. I'll have to get used to these snide reddit inspired remarks.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:20 AM
0

Couldn't agree with you more, which is precisely what I keep trying to explain to the femo-fascist camp. Denial of scientific truth is a real bugbear of mine. What's so silly about these people is that they claim homosexuality is natural, and yet being masculine or feminine isn't! A little consistency would be nice :-D Merry Christmas to you by the way. Your last article on avoiceformen was particularly emotionally resonant and well written :-)
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:17 AM
3

Can you elaborate what you mean? I am new to this reddit thing.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 08:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter