TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rockmapper_ Archive

View 3 posts and 155 comments by Rockmapper_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
46

Activism/SupportRockmapper_/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:45 PM
13

GeneralRockmapper_/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:11 PM
8

Edu./Occu.Rockmapper_/r/MensRights23/05/20 10:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Thank god I don't have that one on my shortlist, that seems a bit of a nightmare.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 02:08 PM
-2

It is statistically the best option. Women either piss or shit and men either piss or shit. Women always sit down so 2/2 is sitting down, men stand up to pee usually but sit down to shit so that would be usually 1/2. Therefore 3/4 of the time the lid would be down naturally. Therefore the seat should be down mostly because it is used as such the most. Nothing to do with preferred female way, I don't care who prefers it which way, it is basic statistics. Instead of getting angry at such a petty t…
/r/MensRights08/08/20 01:53 PM
-27

Everyone should just put it down. It isn't hard.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 07:27 AM
-38

Bro, just be a decent human and put the seat down once you are done, it has nothing to do with gender roles. It is just common decency and takes like 2 seconds.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 07:04 AM
35

Glad to hear that you had an amazing dad throughout this and of that, you being an amazing son too. You are most probably stronger than a lot of people and wish you all the best in your future endeavors.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 08:54 AM
2

A very nice evaluation bro, stay positive.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 09:18 PM
1

Who knew egalitarianism would be so difficult...
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:00 PM
2

I think most people don't care what sex you are, anyone should support men's rights and anyone should support women's rights. It's called wanting equality, keep it up!
/r/MensRights04/08/20 08:34 AM
4

That is kind of funny though. You shouldn't be trying to cancel comedy as it is subjective in nature.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 11:07 PM
3

The best English I have ever seen!
/r/MensRights02/08/20 10:13 AM
2

If that's true, both are assholes there to be fair.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 10:11 AM
18

Where's the split the bill answer?
/r/MensRights02/08/20 06:54 AM
1

Not at all, it is a common place phrase.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 06:47 AM
8

Can you at least, with evidence, justify how we precisely live in a patriarchy?
/r/MensRights01/08/20 09:54 PM
0

I may have typed it wrong, maybe type it in the search bar?
/r/MensRights01/08/20 07:28 PM
-1

Yeah, just have a look round first my man before posting stuff next time! (Obligatory I'm not associated with MRM or feminism)
/r/MensRights01/08/20 06:53 PM
-2

That would seem more relevant to r/askfeminsts my dude.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 06:49 PM
-6

In what relevance does this have to feminism apart from trying to deliberately stump them? I'm going to have to not support you on this one chief.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 06:46 PM
2

Maybe make an alt and flip the genders on everything, more out of curiosity than anything else because if they aren't biased, that should be removed too for the same reason (which isn't even valid).
/r/MensRights01/08/20 07:15 AM
9

If you want, but only if it is as an honest question
/r/MensRights31/07/20 05:26 PM
11

Oh god, no, not like that, I meant I was banned from the sub, I'll edit it. I don't place myself within any ideological group because they don't fully reflect my views of the world.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 03:13 PM
8

I know I am banned from the feminism subreddit and unsure why but I don't know about the other. Edit: misconception
/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:12 PM
28

Could you post that on r/askfeminists with the question of is this sexist because it presumes women are handicapped and need more overt help to keep a business afloat.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 01:56 PM
31

Just to check I'm reading this right... They imply only women need permission from men for sterilization and not other way round ever. You then inform them that both sexes need permission and you agree with them that permission seeking is bad but then add that both should be abolished (no permission from partner needed) and then they still disagree because reasons (inference from dislikes).
/r/MensRights31/07/20 01:54 PM
13

To be honest they won't read past the title.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 10:17 AM
1

Is it Blueorange22? I can't fully recall the number.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 06:07 PM
4

Does it start with Blueorange?
/r/MensRights29/07/20 02:17 PM
22

You suggest that women were property in the past, I guess that statement was formulated from the land ownership and how inheritance has worked. However, just as a side note, women could earn and own property as long as they were not married (then it was transferred to the husband) or widowed. In many cases of the past you are most certainly true, but it isn't totally black and white, there is always nuances to it so always try and remember that. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 12:02 PM
2

Yeah, absolutely! Nobody should be shamed about the height they have, it sucks and I'd know that for certain. However, if done in good faith and as a joke, there is no need to be serious and upset about it, I laugh about that sort of thing all the time. On the whole it is usually despicable to shame someone for a characteristic that is objectively out of their control.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 10:22 PM
2

I don't believe this height thing is entirely socially constructed, there could very much be a biological element to this. If someone is tall that can indicate that they have a) have good genetics (functionally speaking they can reach higher things which is useful in nature always) and b) can indicate a good diet throughout development. This is known because a poor diet leads to stunted bone growth which indicates being empoverished. Biology would suggest we go towards the strongest and best to …
/r/MensRights28/07/20 10:12 PM
3

To be honest, title alone, I can understand that and also just apply it to everyone because sometimes there is no good reason for someone to cry.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 05:04 PM
1

I didn't cry once when watching the whole thing... I guess I just don't cry and stuff lol. Some of the dark humour was hilarious though!
/r/MensRights27/07/20 07:09 AM
7

A good one for a bereaved husband is "After life" on Netflix.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:07 PM
2

It was taken down because it broke one of the subreddit rules, a post earlier today here asked the mods about it and the reason seemed just.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 04:12 PM
5

Well from that, "generalsing statements" surrounding a given sex is harassment, I would say most dudes are "harassed" each week at least.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 01:13 PM
7

How do you define sexual harassment so we can get some guidelines because that can be interpreted dramatically differently between different people?
/r/MensRights21/07/20 01:05 PM
37

Ah yes, adrenaline, the chemical that is also released during the fight or flight response. Horror films cause fear which can trigger such response as adrenaline is released at high anxiety inducing times. From this, we can determine that horror films cause murder! Because correlation always means causation! /s
/r/MensRights20/07/20 09:59 AM
10

Well, have they looked at the demographics of who signed up in the first place?
/r/MensRights14/07/20 11:50 AM
3

Far better worded than anything I could have produced, well done!
/r/MensRights10/07/20 10:20 PM
7

It exists in a legal, justified sense. One Harvard university study observed railway workers over a period of time. Within this time period they basically found women take more unpaid time off, more holidays, and are less likely to work on weekends. From this, the man earns more simply because he does more work. I don't have a link to the study, but it should be easy enough to find on google and what I said comes from free recall. Hope this helps.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 09:37 PM
3

Absolutely! Could not fault you there!
/r/MensRights10/07/20 06:41 PM
9

I see where they are coming from and is why that level of "feminism" may be needed, like a safeguard to prevent social stigmas. Although it not necessarily wide spread, it ultimately exists and addressing it is always good. However, it is a utopian view to fully eradicate almost anything.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 05:51 PM
2

From the title alone, I could never support that horrific man, murder is almost never an option for almost anything. That wife is also a terrible human being for cheating on the husband.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 08:01 AM
2

I can not directly comment on that "egalitarian" so I'll go into a hypothetical agreement there because egalitarianism doesn't mean everyone does the same thing, it is just equal level of opportunity and responsibility. That doesn't necessarily mean equality of outcome but equality of opportunity as different people fit into different roles better. (And this always varies within said population).
/r/MensRights10/07/20 07:37 AM
12

I don't have the exact details on me, but there is also quite a bit of evidence suggesting a heavy biological element to "traditional gender roles". This can also be seen across species where male chimps play with car models and female chimps nurture dolls.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:48 PM
2

On the notion of that, I have not said I am smarter than you. I have just said your claim of myself being "retarded" is rather wrong and localising all interaction between us to this one post would demonstrate this. Using proper technique is the only way to judge mental ability and emotional control as facts have not really come into the picture. Also, please stop with the foul language, it does no good for anyone.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:44 PM
2

If you look on the side bar, you will find many well structured citations and studies that have good value to the psychological and sociological areas of study. This is quite the contrary to your "psuedointellectual" claim.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:39 PM
4

I do not appreciate such foul language... From the context of this post alone, I think you will find quite the opposite. Now, if you don't want to learn anything but instead just bombard us with insults I will ask you politely to go away.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:33 PM
4

Once again, please post well structured sentences. I do not understand what you mean. Be accountable for yourself, you appear to be in such a sorry state in which you act on impulse rather than thought.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:30 PM
5

I'd rather you get an education. Unlike feminist subreddits (which oppose male equality), we encourage discourse of differing opinions to rationalise ideas. Nothing is good in an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:28 PM
7

It is absolutely of your own fault, you decided to click on it, you decided to write a post, you decided to hit send. Take some accountability for your actions...
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:26 PM
7

If you want to learn, we are here to help. If you want to insult, please leave. I am not an MRA but find interest in this rather unspoken area of society.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:24 PM
3

Thanks man, I'll take a look!
/r/MensRights08/07/20 08:27 AM
17

Can I get a link to the actual bill? I've been struggling to find it. Many thanks.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 09:40 PM
64

I thought it was satire...
/r/MensRights06/07/20 06:36 PM
3

I am not aware of one, apologies
/r/MensRights06/07/20 01:03 PM
10

The UK government doesn't accept change.org, only their government website.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 12:29 PM
179

Almost no discrimination is positive. Best person for the job. The only way this should be used is within primary and secondary schools where there should always be men and women as staff and that is because they create role models for the students which is essential for effective development.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 10:17 AM
596

Just a note: it wasn't because he was an MRA, it was a hate crime against his skin colour and gender perpetrated by a black women. (From what I remember)
/r/MensRights05/07/20 08:48 PM
1

Fair enough, maybe dull it down a bit and ask their thoughts on it?
/r/MensRights03/07/20 07:36 PM
1

How did it go?
/r/MensRights03/07/20 07:33 PM
2

I think a lot of people here may see them differently, especially the first "right" so I'll leave that one there. However, I would say for the most part, the second one would be in majority agreement. With hormone blockers to prevent puberty, they can ruin someone's life if they actually decide they are no longer trans and that has happened before. This may be where some people would say no to that. But in a general sense of the best healthcare, it should be no different to that of the general p…
/r/MensRights03/07/20 08:23 AM
6

https://discord.gg/exffQk There you go, I hope this link works!
/r/MensRights29/06/20 06:57 PM
13

There is a mens rights discord server, we have a few feminists on there who want to learn, but they are few and far between.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 05:59 PM
103

Human rights is essentially the same thing to what you want. It isn't justice, but it is what we have.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 09:56 PM
14

That could be due to a lack of [NSFW] tag.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 09:39 PM
3

As it is to do with uk legislation, I presume that those who are not citizens cannot sign it. Feel free to try, but the vote may not register.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 08:02 AM
3

I have not, please could you elaborate, thanks.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 11:53 PM
1

It is possible, it will be more expensive however. In my country, international students would have to pay more than those of the same country.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 11:48 PM
10

One reason could be that the whole mental health sector is orientated in a female-centric manner. There is a full argument, especially in humanistic psychology, that each person is inherently different and so a holistic approach is needed. However, in this industry, people are encouraged to talk through their problems. So, that is good right? Not always... Men have been known to find this approach to lead to further deterioration, especially if it brings up old trauma inducing memories. This cou…
/r/MensRights27/06/20 11:38 PM
2

I can't answer that, but what regions would you be looking towards to help shorten the potential results or are you looking worldwide?
/r/MensRights27/06/20 11:34 PM
7

Basically, it's all to do with the definition. As it involves penetration, a female forcing on a man is not rape under the law. It is something similar to that and I don't have the full definition on me right now so, apologies if that is not fully accurate.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 10:21 PM
53

God, those comments are just depressing to read.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 08:19 PM
9

At least worth trying again, if you don't succeed once, try and try again.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 07:00 PM
8

It's at 22,000 right now, it is worth a shot.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:58 PM
1

in all honesty, I could not give a good answer for that.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 11:21 AM
1

To be honest, most of the shots with actual weapons tend to be in comedy films. If it gets a laugh, I see no issue in it. For example, getting shot in the dick in hot tub time machine was funny as hell because of their reaction to it.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 10:41 AM
13

R/pussypassdenied is not female hate, it is just funny...
/r/MensRights26/06/20 04:37 PM
5

Yeah, I'm just finding it interesting which places have been prioritised first. Even Jordan has a lot of data.
/r/MensRights25/06/20 11:21 AM
14

That is awesome, I find it interesting how they are lacking data for India...
/r/MensRights25/06/20 11:06 AM
2

Because it's funny. The media should do and allow for stereotypes and stereotypical depictions as it can be very humorous when done right. Look to little Britain for example, that is absolutely hilarious
/r/MensRights23/06/20 01:57 PM
8

I know of one legislation that means men are technically oppressed in Scotland. This is through making a female quota of over 50% in public boards. This means that having a male majority is inherently bad (according to that society) whereas a female majority is inherently good even if the men are hypothetically better skilled.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 09:43 PM
11

This sub is mainly meant to be for the promotion of mens rights and social views as they are often neglected throughout society.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 09:41 PM
4

Discrimination against sex is sexism... This happens all around the world all the time and is disgusting. Let people have free will and chose what careers they want, this is pressure for women to go into these fields...
/r/MensRights19/06/20 02:25 PM
2

To be honest, that is kind of a funny gift...
/r/MensRights14/06/20 06:48 AM
1

I can't remember the site, but Harvard disproved the illegally paid less part.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 06:58 AM
6

Petition to remove the word "midwife" then!
/r/MensRights02/06/20 04:46 PM
7

In 2017, of all police brutality, 940 men compared to 45 women were shot by the police. This is far more a gendered issue than a race issue but both may play a role.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 07:39 PM
3

I think it's a good idea, 1 day a week. I know this is mens rights only. But it would help show that both men and women have hardships. Also, PR wise it may reduce this sub being seen as a hate group for no reason.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 09:54 PM
3

Sometimes I feel that the feminists here are only so frequent because of the anti-men tendencies they have. By addressing their men are bad narrative, it is promoting mens rights.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 11:44 AM
5

The usual response is those don't consider population size so that's how they say black people are x times more likely to be shot/killed.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 11:31 AM
2

Here talks about mens rights, but I think some of us will be rather accepting if you incorporate a bit of both in your posts =D Edit: want to just add to that my DMs are open and this is probably your best bet at not being censored, the mods seem pretty chill and awesome here.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 10:33 PM
15

That is an amazing advertisement, focusing on the positive!
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:30 PM
38

This has been taken down and the user has been banned... this just shows what happens when these issues come up.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 07:59 PM
8

To be honest, I think a normal person would just call you a rational thinker.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 10:56 PM
8

As part of the UK, this makes me very happy
/r/MensRights28/05/20 10:10 PM
9

Equal opportunities. The notion of equal outcomes is ridiculous as it removes the idea of personal choice and independent decisions. Nothing will be 50/50 split or the same. It is mathematically improbable that a 50/50 split is happening without deliberate intervention preventing someone else from a job.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 02:51 PM
1

That's deliberately hitting someone. That is abuse.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 02:49 PM
11

Almost tempted to take a screenshot of those rules and post it there. If it had a chance of staying up, that would be very funny.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 11:18 AM
2

Never heard of it... so I dont think so
/r/MensRights28/05/20 10:52 AM
2

I am very lost ;)
/r/MensRights28/05/20 10:50 AM
14

That's probably because that individual has no actual evidence to back their point up.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:46 PM
2

"Its over anakin, I have the high ground"
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:44 PM
3

Yeah, I think this was proposed by the EU initially but I'm not 100% sure so don't quote me on that.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:43 PM
7

I always wondered why they didn't change "midwife" to "midperson"
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:41 PM
3

It was less to not offend someone, it was more trying to explain my viewpoint for further understanding to get a full perspective of the belief I possess. I have a strong distaste to PC/censorship culture but I love it when people can justify what they say.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:06 PM
2

Yeah, I know that's the majority view here, just had to incorporate it into my statement just to be "safe". Side note: I would fully support/advocate for a "blind" court system where sex/gender and names are not know when making decisions.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:59 PM
2

Very interesting video. I would say we need a movement that incorporates mens rights most certainly but one that also considers the lives of others around them also meaning they are not harmed as consequence to the actions. When I say harmed, I am meaning in a sense that puts them at a systematic or social disadvantage.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:42 PM
14

An absolute darling!
/r/MensRights27/05/20 06:28 PM
9

Surprisingly, I agree with exactly 1 of their points, and that is point 2: abusers make abusers.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 05:49 PM
2

I wonder how feminists are going to make this an issue. If they are good at one thing, it's making stuff up.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 04:20 PM
33

Note to self, probably never use those sort of apps.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 08:36 AM
5

Good question, it is not sexism, the female brain matures faster than the male brain.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 07:12 AM
2

That's a good song
/r/MensRights27/05/20 07:00 AM
5

I really like the suggestion of the change they would make, it is far more inclusive.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 08:38 PM
30

I'm glad you are still here with us despite not knowing who you are. To keep it sweet and simple: just remember to be yourself and stay strong!
/r/MensRights26/05/20 07:31 PM
2

Didn't you know.? This is the new equality!
/r/MensRights26/05/20 01:05 PM
5

Look into the Duluth model. Around 26 countries use this. It essentially suggests that men will be the presumed perpetrators of domestic violence. It has even gone to if a man is bleeding it is probably because the women did it in self defense. I would say that is pretty systematic against men. Note: studies/statistics have shown that men are just as likely, or very similar to experiencing domestic violence as women.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 09:49 AM
1

So, someone with no education on basic biology and economics: the usual.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 10:10 PM
1

Oh, I'm fully against radical feminism. But the idea of women's equality, especially in the 3rd world, I'm all for. I'm hopeful some of them will go that route. I believe in free speech, de platforming people is censorship. I'm against censorship. Censorship stops societal progression. Unfortunately, feminists do that to this movement which is horrific.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 09:28 PM
1

And that's a good thing, we should set a good example, not drop to their level. You don't want to be a hate group right?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 06:31 PM
8

They are saying you can disagree if you still agree with our ideology.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:29 PM
1

Can you explain? I asked them but they just muted.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:28 PM
1

Second one: I don't see any issue with your brother. Subjective experience is not always reliable because your internal bias will skew a situation a particular way. To demonstrate an oppressive structure you have to look at the whole. If one person has a negative experience, it doesn't mean everyone does. If you can provide evidence of large groups statistically experiencing this then it would be wrong to disagree. This is presuming these statistics are accurate and relatively modern.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:26 PM
1

First one: All stereotypes usually have a level of truth to them, they have to come from somewhere. This applies to all groups of people.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:24 PM
1

Then copy text?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:22 PM
1

I'm a worthless loser because I value both male and female issues?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:19 PM
1

How do I link them?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:19 PM
1

I would do that, but I'm already banned, not sure why though.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:15 PM
1

Absolutely agree! It's just I'm against silencing a group to promote another. You add on, you don't remove.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 03:54 PM
1

Yeah, the links are there mostly because it proves that it isnt a movement based off of a fallacy.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 03:24 PM
2

I'm not a self-declared mra, but from what I can gather, this is an equality movement focused on improving mens societal issues both socially and in the law. If you are socially or lawfully recognised as a man, this is focusing about you. A common misconception is that mra are anti-female. They are not against women's rights, they just want men to be treated fairly. Note: look in the about section of this subreddit, it's very long but the first bit may show what you are trying to find.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 03:20 PM
2

So, you can only disagree if it still agrees with "our" agenda?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 01:07 PM
6

You got an up vote from me bro, unwanted dps are never reasonable.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 01:01 PM
1

Wowza, that's... aggressive Edit: nor your comment, the thingy.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:55 PM
2

Yeah, they are probably one of the people who give this community a bad rep
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:52 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:49 PM
1

I never considered myself an MRA, I'm just pro equality/equity. I don't like graffiti personally, I was talking about the message around it/what it conveys
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:48 PM
0

'm personally against this one, if it was originally "women" then it's wrong. However, if it was deliberately made like that then that's good too. Women and men are abused and so both should be shown. (Yea I know women get more attention but we shouldn't reduce that, we should rise to the same level instead of drag women down like feminists do to us men, don't stoop to that level) Edit: against the whole idea of the title for this post, this is just about the graffiti
/r/MensRights25/05/20 10:55 AM
30

And a touch of common sense
/r/MensRights25/05/20 09:17 AM
360

Ah yes, trolls are those who want equality.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 09:10 AM
2

I would suggest looking at the cereal packet family because that seems to be what you are demonstrating. It's a sociological term for a certain family structure.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 09:09 PM
30

Yay, that's a wonderful thing to see!
/r/MensRights24/05/20 07:48 PM
2

Neither because none do any good for society.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 06:07 PM
2

Ok thanks, hopefully I'm safe then!
/r/MensRights24/05/20 06:04 PM
3

If it isnt personally identifiable, can I ask which uni this is or at least which region? I plan to study criminology with sociology after my A-levels.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 05:46 PM
2

Ok then, it was just a speculation based off of what I thought the data came from.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 05:09 PM
4

Personally, I think they responded to your negativity with negativity. Was it wrong to call you an incel, yes but if someone wants to mention their gender, there isnt anything wrong.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 02:54 PM
3

Can you please check/clear your notifications.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 02:35 PM
2

That may also play a role into it no doubt. I just disagree it's the sole reason.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 10:52 AM
-4

That may not be due to a biological basis but it is because of lifestyle choices. If they are using the stats I think they are, it is based off of China. This is significant because most men smoke compared to very few women. This is the reason more men die from it: poor lung health.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 09:44 AM
2

In psychology, the bystander effect is the phenomenon where people don't intervene in a situation due to the presumption someone else will help. Look to pilliavan subway study for that. Bystander intervention, I'm guessing that is when a bystander actively tries to help someone, going against the passive norm.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 07:43 AM
4

If I recall correctly, boys tend to fare better in those subjects: especially science as it is more practical based. Personally, I would like to see a complete school reform that focuses more on life skills than academia or at least add more useable skills into the system. However, standardised tests are needed as it is a good basis for employers. But in the current system, it is difficult to tell, a part of me has no issue with this as in the working world, men tend to do quite well in some res…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 10:20 PM
11

Well, there is a biological aspect: girls mature faster than boys. That can be one explanation or a part of one. There is also another: societal change. For example, Sue Sharpe found that girls attitudes have changed since the 1980s (or around there, not got my sociology notes on me). They used to focus more on a family instead of perusing a career. This has shifted to the other way round more. This aspiration for achievement, which is good, could explain this. One other point: the introduction …
/r/MensRights23/05/20 09:32 PM
10

This person is an absolute legend, go to her youtube channel (Cassie Jaye) and watch some of her other videos!
/r/MensRights22/05/20 07:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter