TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RockyMaiviaJnr Archive

View 1 post and 279 comments by RockyMaiviaJnr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Edu./Occu.RockyMaiviaJnr/r/MensRights09/04/24 10:05 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Unsafe is better than uncomfortable. If you’re going to complain against her I would say that you don’t feel safe. You don’t have a right to comfort. You have a right to safety (in many countries) so she’s taking away your basic human rights by making you feel unsafe. Fuck HR.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 12:15 AM
10

It’s not true that 50% get divorced. 50% of marriages end in divorce. People with multiple marriages vastly skew this stat
/r/MensRights25/06/26 03:35 AM
1

Zero. No. Trans women aren’t women and trans men aren’t men. Rapists are scum. The grooming gangs and all those who enabled or allowed them to operate should face the full consequences under the law.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 03:54 AM
46

Not quite true. https://www.stuff.co.nz/timaru-herald/news/81025573/domestic-violence-study-presents-challenging-picture The Dunedin study is one of the longest running and best ongoing longitudinal studies in the world, covering 1,000 people born in 1973. They have found the domestic abuse is perpetrated by men and women at very similar rates, which people did not like but that’s what the data showed. I agree with your point that it’s not something people set out to study enough, and it’s hard …
/r/MensRights18/06/26 12:48 AM
97

Can we start using ‘breeding age’ to refer to women too?
/r/MensRights06/06/26 07:46 PM
0

So far you’ve made two claims 1) France has higher hourly productivity than USA and 2) that USA benefits from the strength of its dollar. Both are objectively false. You haven’t acknowledged that you were wrong, just doubled down making more claims which I have to assume are just as nonsense. So your claims were incorrect, right?
/r/MensRights03/06/26 07:57 AM
0

Right, so you were wrong? Productivity per hour is higher in the US than France. But also the US works 20% more hours than France, so the productivity per person, or economic output per worker, gap is much bigger - which is the most relevant given things like taking sick days impact productivity per person but not per hour. The unadjusted output per worker is $158k for US and $102k for France. Doing a PPP adjustment actually helps the French, lifting them to $127k. So again; you are just wrong. …
/r/MensRights02/06/26 10:24 PM
0

Factually not true. Hourly productivity is higher in the USA AND they work a lot more hours than the French which means their gdp per person is nearly double France ($86k vs 48k) I’m not American, I can just read data. The data also says USA productivity is accelerating faster than France, so the gap is only going to get bigger.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:11 AM
-1

That’s a narrow view about current state. I’m not talking about the current government or their policies. I’m saying that USA has crushed all of the European countries in key economic performance like productivity and GDP (in absolute, rate of growth and per citizen metrics) for decades now, going back at least 40 years and more. Therefore for any law, regulation or policy change that affects these areas, such as labour laws, it makes no sense to model the USA after Europe, unless you want low p…
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:03 AM
-5

Where did I say we were supposed to throw the losing countries away? You need to respond to what I actually said, not create emotional strawmen in your head. Why would the most successful country in an endeavor remodel itself after any country that’s significantly less successful? Which in this case is every country. Should we model ourselves after the top of the class or on two kids from the bottom of the class?
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:45 PM
-6

Who gives a fuck what France and Germany are doing? Both countries have poor productivity, weak gdp growth and have been getting killed economically by USA for decades. Why on earth would anyone take the training plan for a junior high school sprinter and tell Usain Bolt that’s what he should be doing? Germany and France should be changing their labour laws to be more like the USA
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:10 PM
1

The means of male and female IQ are the same though. So…..
/r/MensRights26/05/26 10:23 PM
2

Go ask ai if there’s any evidence men have better complex problem solving abilities in advanced mathematics. You might learn something. Why do you think men dominate women in games like chess and scrabble at the highest level? You explain it
/r/MensRights26/05/26 02:53 PM
11

Yes, high variability means specifically that there are more dumb men, that’s exactly what it means. Part of the problem here is that because so many women seem to find it hard to grasp mathematical concepts like the one you’ve misunderstood that they can’t even grasp why they are underrepresented in STEM fields where the concept you’ve misunderstood is so basic is makes me head hurt that you don’t get it.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:01 PM
3

Women do not have the same overall mathematical ability as men. Boys and girls score similarly in mathematical ability through most age groups, until you get to complex mathematical problem solving, the type that is required in senior high school and university STEM courses. In this regard males significantly outperform females. It’s not just choice, women are less capable in these fields. You are right about IQ but it’s not just at the extremes of all fields. CEOs have average IQs around 115 fo…
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:56 PM
16

Actually women still had a lot of privileges in the past, it’s just that they aren’t talked about by feminists pushing their one sided narratives. For example, wives could go into many stores and buy things on store credit, but the debt and responsibility lay with the husband to pay it. So if that debt incurred by the wife wasn’t paid the husband would be held accountable and could be sent to jail. Women were absolutely exempt from drafts into WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam etc. How many men died fro…
/r/MensRights29/10/25 12:37 AM
19

Do you think any man or woman should be allowed to murder any man or woman with no punishment if they claim the person is a rapist? Do you see any problems with this approach? You need to think more
/r/MensRights15/09/25 10:51 PM
0

See was that so hard??
/r/MensRights06/07/25 09:08 AM
0

‘It was usually about’ Stop making up stats. Links or gtfo.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 09:00 AM
2

Someone posts links to multiple studies, then you vaguely claim ‘no but other studies’ without any links or details and think it means something? From studies I’ve seen all Australians are a bit slow.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 08:58 AM
3

The 90th percentile woman is about the same strength as the 10th percentile man. A trained woman might match the average man. Might.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 04:01 AM
2

This is a men’s rights sub. If you want to ask feminists go somewhere else. Mods should delete this nonsense.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 07:25 AM
8

Rape is both illegal and socially unacceptable. Rapists are treated as social pariahs. How is that a rape culture?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 07:11 AM
2

That’s a load of nonsense. Stop circulating feminist propaganda
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:53 AM
11

Men are conscripted and dying whilst women get to leave yet are suffering ‘immense losses’? Fuck off.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:47 AM
16

Because modern women are strong, independent victims.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:39 AM
1

A lot of men have trust in their partners who carry kids that aren’t theirs. Don’t you want to help those men and those kids? Elective testing is an accusation that most women won’t take well. Making it mandatory removes that and ensures the true parents are known. The parents of children have legal rights and obligations, so it absolutely IS a state matter as to who the true parents are.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 05:42 AM
16

Such a sexist article. Doesn’t give a fuck about boys, only girls.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 12:14 AM
1

No, toxic masculinity doesn’t exist. People are toxic. Ideas are toxic. Masculinity isn’t toxic.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 02:17 AM
1

Dude is you and no you’re still wrong. People can have whatever preferences they like you dictator
/r/MensRights28/02/25 04:40 AM
1

No one gives a fuck if you’re offended.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:52 AM
5

Nope I never told you that you have to support anything.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:26 AM
3

And I believe you should mind your own business and stop trying to control other people’s preferences. I also don’t believe god exists and think anyone who believes that is a child
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:41 AM
5

Feminists are toxic and liars. But that doesn’t help your argument that you get to say what our preferences should be. Society is sexist. Again, no a reason for you to dictate our preferences
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:30 AM
5

Nope, that’s not true at all. No one has to get surgery because of anyone else’s personal preferences. They choose to get surgery. So if that’s your issue then focus on that, not the preferences. I’ll have whatever preferences I like.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:08 AM
16

What? Nah I’ll have whatever preferences I like thanks, and so can everyone else. Your name calling and preaching is arrogant and condescending
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:46 AM
1

A registry isn’t regulation. Do you not know what any words actually mean? When governments regulate markets or industries they don’t mean creating a registry lol. Unverified arguments from popularity aren’t evidence or an argument. If you want to kill babies at least have some sort of rationale. ‘Most people agree with me’ isn’t a logical, rational argument. I’m an atheist so I don’t believe in a creator. But that ‘argument’ is an argument for no laws whatsoever. Why not just let people rape, s…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 05:23 AM
1

No, they are regulating abortion. That’s different than regulating pregnancy. Stop being dishonest. You didn’t answer my questions. Again. You just spewed some absolute nonsense. Clearly a fetus is different than a sperm. A one week old baby is not capable of surviving without care. Are you allowed to kill people who have a good chance of dying anyway? No.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 05:57 AM
1

But my point that you are being dishonest by saying the government ‘regulates pregnancy’ has nothing to do with proper medicine being practiced in Texas or anywhere else so that’s totally irrelevant. I asked you some pretty clear questions. What you should be doing is answering those questions, not just ignoring them to instead ask me questions. My answers have nothing to do with your justification for your position. So then defend the lifestyle abortions that you support. Why should mothers be …
/r/MensRights18/02/25 01:52 AM
1

Right, so then you are using the rare case of medically necessary abortions to try and argue against abortion bans because you really agree with lifestyle abortions. Again, that’s just dishonest. If you support lifestyle abortions then argue for lifestyle abortions without talking about medically necessary or rape or pregnant 12 year olds or any other tiny percentage of abortions. Why should a mother be able to kill her baby at 8 weeks but not 20 weeks or 1 week after birth?
/r/MensRights16/02/25 09:30 PM
1

If a life is saved because government stopped someone killing a baby then is that government overreach? Why are you looking at only one side of the equation? The same changes did both. So you only support abortion when it’s medically necessary, not for lifestyle abortions?
/r/MensRights16/02/25 07:29 AM
1

And that’s the dishonesty from you. You could just use the actual word and say government is regulating abortion. But you purposefully choose to not do that, and instead use a related word that’s much broader and makes it sound like massive government over reach. That’s what people who don’t have rational arguments do. Every abortion prevented is a life saved, so if saving lives is your key metric then you should be against abortion. But you aren’t so you’re being dishonest. Again. No surprise.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 06:45 AM
0

You didn’t say the state was sticking their nose into reproductive health. You said they were regulating pregnancy. Again, not the same thing. It’s dishonest to only present half of the info. How many lives have these laws saved?
/r/MensRights16/02/25 01:53 AM
0

It’s also not pregnancy. It’s just abortion. ‘Regulating pregnancy’ implies government overreach into all sorts areas of pregnancy that aren’t to do with abortion. That’s why it’s dishonest.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 10:28 PM
-8

Well none of that is relevant but ok. Abortion and pregnancy aren’t the same thing. Banning abortion and regulating pregnancy are not the same thing. It’s not that complicated.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 08:39 AM
15

Banning abortion is not regulating pregnancy. Stop being dishonest by pretending they are equivalent.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 07:50 AM
27

Yes it is grossly unfair. If a woman needs an abortion for medical reasons or should be her decision, as it’s her medical situation and her life at risk. But 95% of abortions aren’t for that. They are for lifestyle reasons. Both parents consent should be needed for those abortions. Equal rights.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 06:20 PM
-1

Nothing I said was pretending like women don’t assault men. Neither was anything Peterson said. So your comments there are totally irrelevant and off topic. Most rapists are known to their victims. Most people in the modern world live in cities and towns where they don’t know everyone in their community. Sexual misbehavior is a vague and ill defined term that is clearly a lot wider than SA. Don’t try and pretend they are the same. The real issue is you seem unable to respond to what was said/wri…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 08:00 PM
16

He’s right. A minority of men want to attack and/or rape women. These men are far more likely to choose a woman by herself as a target, rather than one with men around her. Nowhere does he say nor imply that rape is the norm among men. Nor is there any logical reasoning to get from what he said to that view. The issue is your drawing invalid conclusions and putting words in his mouth with unjustified logical leaps. Stick to addressing what people ACTUALLY say, not making things up and pretending…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 05:08 AM
5

Um, no that’s the whole point. They want attention. They want people to care about the atrocities they commit. So after years of killing boys with no one caring they finally realized they have to kidnap girls to get the attention they crave. It was by design, and they got what they wanted. Not a mistake
/r/MensRights11/01/25 09:55 PM
1

Yeah but most of these are worthless nonsense degrees. Men still dominate the valuable degrees
/r/MensRights22/12/24 07:23 PM
1

But it’s voluntary for women and compulsory for men. Why post a link in a non English language??
/r/MensRights21/12/24 08:36 AM
1

Great point. Well articulated
/r/MensRights21/12/24 07:01 AM
1

So they are right. Which means you are wrong
/r/MensRights20/12/24 08:31 PM
1

Did Reuters lie? https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/serbia-moves-reintroduce-compulsory-military-service-2024-09-20/
/r/MensRights20/12/24 10:47 AM
1

So it’s not compulsory for all genders. You’re lying
/r/MensRights20/12/24 09:27 AM
2

I’d go further. These tests should be mandatory at birth to protect men.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 07:37 PM
24

Smells like bullshit to me
/r/MensRights26/11/24 08:31 PM
6

With feminism
/r/MensRights18/11/24 04:01 AM
1

No. We should let anyone speak with a different point of view to ours. Let’s not be like the rest of Reddit.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 03:49 AM
4

Why is she a despicable person?
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:24 AM
1

Only 4% of combat roles are women in the IDF. They serve mainly ‘support roles’. Thats not equality. That’s sending men to die while women organize logistics. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_Israel_Defense_Forces#:~:text=Israel%20is%20one%20of%20only,the%20Druze%2C%20and%20the%20Circassians.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:02 AM
3

Actually it impacts the child more than anyone. I’m not talking about relationship conversations, I’m talking about the law. You should need both parents permission to get an abortion. Isn’t that equality? So all you’ve done there is send men to the front lines to die. That’s not equality. Equality is women carry the same responsibility as men. Or do you only want the rights but none of the responsibility?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:59 AM
2

So when a country is at war the women should be drafted and put on the front lines the same as men? And you think both parents should have equal say over whether their child gets aborted or not? Strange how you never hear feminists complaining about things like this
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:40 PM
90

Feminists don’t want actual equality. They only want equality in things where said equality is a benefit to women. So that’s women’s advocacy. Which is fine, but call it what it is. Also, men and women aren’t equal. Equal means the same. We aren’t the same. We are different. So therefore equality will never exist.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:16 AM
-41

Women aren’t
/r/MensRights02/11/24 04:36 AM
17

1 - yes. As feminism has taken over women have got unhappier https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Stevenson_ParadoxDecliningFemaleHappiness_Dec08.pdf 2 - No. No. 3 - No, wtf would anyone?? 4 - a) women carry no responsibility for defending the country (ie the draft) yet have equal say in who our leaders are that will send us to war. b) men have no say in abortion. Both parents should have equal say, no abortion without both parents consent. So in both of these…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 05:21 AM
3

At what point is it not infanticide?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 07:32 PM
-1

At what point is it not murder?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 07:31 PM
5

Other studies have shown that working 10% more hours tends to lead to 40% more pay. So it’s quite material
/r/MensRights16/09/24 07:51 PM
4

I agree
/r/MensRights04/09/24 11:00 PM
14

It shows young women are generally clueless about the world around them and how it works. I’d suspect young men are generally the same. The real worries are the older ones who haven’t grown out of it and are even more delusional in some cases.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 10:50 PM
3

Well teenage boys are stronger than women so that makes sense.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 10:21 PM
7

Good post. I mean at the high level you can see the cumulative effect of everything men have done, both good and bad. For thousands of years life expectancies have gone up, standards of living have improved, everyone has got richer and populations have grown. Good job men.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 12:46 AM
175

Strong independent women turns out to need men. Who woulda thunk?
/r/MensRights02/09/24 08:47 PM
1

I agree strength and fitness based standards as bare minimums, regardless of gender, are needed for the safety of everyone in the army. However the reality is that puts the responsibility almost entirely onto men as women can’t compete. Almost no women have the same strength as an average man. So you haven’t created any equality. You’re still placing the responsibility on men. So sending people to die based on strength is still gender based discrimination. This is also how I know which army wins…
/r/MensRights25/08/24 09:03 PM
1

First of all you’re delusional if you think that. You clearly don’t understand the physical differences between men and women. 20,000 random dudes would demolish 20,000 volunteer women. Secondly, that wasn’t what I asked. You’re clearly trying to find an exception to the rule, which is dishonest because we both know what the rule is. The men slaughter the women on a like for like basis.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 05:53 AM
1

You didn’t answer my question. If 20,000 men fought 20,000 women and both sides had the same equipment who has the most deaths? By the way, the same equipment means both sides get 100 pounds or more of gear to carry miles into battle before they fight. So who wins?
/r/MensRights22/08/24 12:09 AM
1

So you are choosing to send people to die over your dei mindset. You haven’t addressed the added danger to men of having women serve alongside them. Not bothered about the lives of either men or women? If 20,000 men fight 20,000 women with same equipment who has the most deaths?
/r/MensRights21/08/24 10:47 PM
1

Conscription has always happened in every country. It will happen again. Leaders can legally conscript. No one is campaigning on removing conscription laws are they? So then you choose to send women to die on the frontlines at the same rates as men?
/r/MensRights21/08/24 08:53 PM
1

First of all, on your voluntary service comments. Women are weaker than men. They are significantly worse at fighting. Fighting units rely heavily on each other to survive. So by putting women on the front line you are setting them up for failure and also putting any man serving alongside them at significant risk. So you’re going to lose lives in the name of equality. Why should men deal with inferior women in their fighting units? You prioritize your ideals over peoples lives. Is that really th…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 05:49 AM
1

So then for countries with compulsory military service, or conscription during times of war like we just saw with Ukraine, there are currently no countries that give women equal responsibility to men in terms of frontline service. So to create equality, we either need to put women into front line service at the same rates as men, or to give men greater rights that go with their greater responsibility. The most sensible re balancing would be to remove the right to stand for public office and/or t…
/r/MensRights20/08/24 10:22 PM
1

Do both genders have equal responsibilities to go along with those equal rights? If not, it’s not really equality is it?
/r/MensRights20/08/24 03:23 AM
1

Good one. You got me there
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:58 AM
2

You’re right, it’s more than half
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:50 AM
-1

How is stating biological facts sexist or misandrist? Men and women are not equal. That’s a fact.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 02:00 AM
1

No it doesn’t, because strength isn’t the only reason we conscript men and not women. Yes men’s lives are worth less. Welcome to reality
/r/MensRights19/08/24 01:59 AM
0

I like having a country. If you prefer to run away like a coward that’s up to you.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 01:57 AM
0

So what’s a functional society? Humans are the most successful life form on earth. Trying to argue our societies are not functional is clearly crazy talk.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 11:47 PM
0

Then what is a functional society? How are these society’s surviving if they aren’t functional?
/r/MensRights18/08/24 10:52 PM
1

That’s not how logic works. You need to provide evidence of your claim. It’s not up to me to disprove it. It’s called the burden of proof. Claiming half the population hates men is retarded and childish
/r/MensRights18/08/24 10:51 PM
0

No I don’t. Because men and women are not equal.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 10:50 PM
2

Weak men are stronger than strong women. In strength tests the 90th percentile women tend to be as strong as the 10th percentile men. The gap is bigger than you seem to think. You have to decide to conscript or give up your country at some point. If you want to give up your country that’s on you. No, men are far more disposable than women in society. You don’t seem to live in the real world
/r/MensRights18/08/24 10:49 PM
1

That’s stupid. Men are stronger than women. Ability matters. Men and women aren’t the same.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:25 PM
1

So America hasn’t historically been a functional society?
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:24 PM
0

That’s nonsense. You need to grow up a bit.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:23 PM
-5

His post is true. wtf are you on? You want women on front lines??
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:23 PM
30

The man vs bear question is great because it helps you identify the people that are not capable of thinking rationally and only work off emotion or biases. Sounds like you outed a couple of dropkicks you’re better off not being friends with.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 08:17 PM
19

Brilliant response
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:47 AM
1

You look at the gametes. Sperm or eggs. There is no spectrum, it’s one or the other.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:54 AM
1

OR it’s the fact they FTM pose no threat to males in sports or prisons, yet MTF pose massive threats to women in those and other arenas. You also can’t change your sex, so don’t think those are even vaguely accurate terms
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:51 AM
0

I’m just advocating for data based decision making on what is best for the kids. Whether people like it or not is a different discussion.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 12:40 AM
1

As an aside I’m not big fan of the 50:50 model. It’s based around what’s fair for the parents not what’s best for the child. I believe there’s research showing children spending 70/80% of time with one parent creates stability and the kids do better. The problem is fairly assessing what’s best for the child, without bias. I have seen data showing the following facts: - children of single fathers fare better than children of single mothers. - mothers are more likely than fathers to kill kids unde…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:42 PM
1

Bro. Read the post I replied to. It’s right there. Stop being dense
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:27 PM
1

1 in 25
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:38 AM
1

‘According to various internet articles’. What is the source for the claim that 4% of fathers may not be the fathers?
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:37 AM
1

Oh no, I understood you. I just don’t see how a frame of ”I don’t care at all what’s good for the country” is ever a good one for discussion of an issue. Because in the real world that always matters
/r/MensRights30/06/24 07:52 AM
1

That seems like a good frame to make decisions through lol
/r/MensRights30/06/24 03:49 AM
1

So then drafted women have to fill as many frontline roles as men
/r/MensRights29/06/24 10:50 PM
1

Right, but that sacrifice should be equal if the rights are equal?
/r/MensRights29/06/24 10:45 PM
6

That’s no good, you just give up your country that way. So should women serve in 50% of frontline roles when drafted? I mean if they serve in logistics and flying drones while men die in mud that’s hardly equality is it?
/r/MensRights29/06/24 10:38 PM
6

Right, that’s equal. Or if women aren’t drafted they shouldn’t be able to vote for politicians that send people into war. That would also be equal
/r/MensRights29/06/24 09:40 PM
41

Why is it right that women got the vote without the responsibility of being drafted? Doesn’t equal rights also mean equal responsibilities? Otherwise it’s just privilege
/r/MensRights29/06/24 09:24 PM
3

Anyone making a claim has the burden of proof. You made a claim. Do you have any proof?
/r/MensRights29/06/24 02:17 AM
2

Still waiting on that evidence
/r/MensRights28/06/24 10:36 PM
31

Evidence please
/r/MensRights28/06/24 04:49 AM
1

That doesn’t prove humans are monogamous. There is no study or research in there that lands on that as valid conclusion. It spends a lot of time talking about the behavior of primates and other mammals, which is senseless because our behavior has evolved to be totally different from theirs. Right at the end it highlights that alloparenting (a mother letting others hold and help raise her baby) is a unique human behavior that no other primate replicates - totally invalidating all the ‘well apes t…
/r/MensRights25/06/24 08:31 PM
2

Please present the research or evidence that proves humans are monogamous.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 08:00 PM
5

Because women put a greater emotional attachment on sex than men do. So women who sleep around are always emotionally damaged to some extent, which only increases the more guys she sleeps with. The same isn’t true of men.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 07:46 PM
1

What a long irrelevant rant that has zero to do with what I said.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 06:50 PM
0

I have my own money, if all you are bringing to the relationship is wanting to be man and pay for things then what’s the point? Maybe focus on being a woman instead of being a man?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:35 AM
–

Nope it hasn’t turned into anything. Be a man and you’ll attract a woman
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:29 AM
-6

Because women want men who can provide for them. Men don’t really care whether a woman who can provide or not. Paying for the date as a man shows the woman you are a provider and you’re setting yourself up as the leader of a relationship. It’s also a great way to find out if they are super feminist about trying to pay, so you know and can avoid a second date.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:06 AM
-5

A man with a gun beats a woman with a gun. If an army of 100,000 men with guns fought an army of 100,000 women with guns, who wins? The men
/r/MensRights15/06/24 09:09 PM
-5

But men are a lot better at fighting than women are. A lot. So does having women in the front lines actually help?
/r/MensRights15/06/24 07:36 PM
1

TLDR
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:51 AM
0

If you’re still carrying on about man vs bear then you’re going to lose people. Why do you assume I’d argue with your actual Point?
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:47 AM
1

You guess wrong. I didn’t read all that nonsense. I saw man vs bear and switched off
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:16 AM
1

No, I’m just bored of this stale conversation as are most people
/r/MensRights15/06/24 08:18 AM
0

Bro no one cares. Move on.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 06:41 AM
1

Because those concerns aren’t reasonable. I didn’t see anyone dismissing sexual assault
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:41 AM
4

If you feel like you aren’t being taken seriously and want to address that, then the way to do that is to demonstrate competence. Then people start taking you seriously. In this example demonstrating gross incompetence in basic decision making is not going to result in you being taken more seriously. It’s going to achieve the opposite. No, pointing out basic facts of reality doesn’t make me part of the problem. It just means you are trying to shift blame and avoid women having any accountability…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:32 AM
67

The man vs bear nonsense demonstrates that many women are irrational, illogical and make decisions based on emotions rather than facts. Every women who answered ‘bear’ demonstrated this.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:12 AM
1

If anything it’s men who are excluded from top jobs because of what’s in their pants. This is why quotas etc are evil. Based on a fundamentally flawed worldview that every group must be equally represented at every level or it’s sexism, racism, homophobia etc
/r/MensRights10/06/24 07:33 PM
1

If it’s based on aptitude then the vast majority of CEOs will be men, because men are more likely to have the combination of traits needed for that role.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:40 PM
2

I didn’t say it was separate. I said it’s not her body. Which its not. So the ‘it’s her body’ argument doesn’t work. Why should she alone have that right when it’s not her alone that carries the responsibility when the baby is born? Rights come with responsibilities too. People tend to forget that side. If you think she should be the only one with that right then she should be the only one with that responsibility after it’s born, right? No, what’s up for debate here is anything I want to debate…
/r/MensRights05/06/24 08:30 PM
2

Bodily autonomy applies to your right to refuse medical treatment. It doesn’t mean you have the unilateral right to decide what medical treatments you get. A fetus is not her body. It’s a separate body with different DNA. If both parents have equal responsibility for the child when it is born then both should have equal say over whether it’s born. How does a woman have all the rights but then share the responsibility. The OP prefers a ‘financial abortion’ ie abdicate the responsibility given the…
/r/MensRights05/06/24 04:30 AM
1

I’m not pro life and I never said I was. I said both parents consent should be needed before an abortion was performed. That’s not pro life. So it looks like there IS a misunderstanding and it’s on your part. In fairness to you it’s not clear to me that abortions should be legal, and I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately. The arguments I’m making could support a pro-life argument, but I don’t agree with everything pro life people say so I’m not with them, but I understand your confusion. Th…
/r/MensRights04/06/24 07:40 PM
3

I wouldn’t see why the logic changes because it’s a pill vs a vacumn? It’s still not your body. Depends on the contraceptive. I would guess anything that prevents pregnancy is not an abortion. But anything that ends pregnancy is. Don’t know enough about all of them. If father is not known can’t get an abortion. Doesn’t change for rape. Sperm donors or surrogates can sign those rights over to the parents. This is based on biology, relationship issues aren’t relevant. You can do safe dna tests on …
/r/MensRights04/06/24 10:51 AM
2

You keep saying cells as though that dehumanizes it somehow. You are just a clump of cells. So am I. A person is a clump of cells. The relevant point here is that clump of cells is not her body. Different DNA. You haven’t addressed the ‘bodily autonomy’ point, which refers to your right to refuse treatment. You don’t have any right to have any medical procedures conferred by medical ethics. No, I’m arguing that an abortion is a medical procedure and therefore your bodily autonomy doesn’t give yo…
/r/MensRights04/06/24 10:44 AM
2

Other people can refuse medical treatment that you want. You can refuse treatment that you don’t want hit you don’t have the right to demand and receive any treatment that you want.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:39 AM
2

Other people can refuse medical treatment that you want. You can refuse treatment that you don’t want hit you don’t have the right to demand and receive any treatment that you want.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:39 AM
2

Other people can refuse medical treatment that you want. You can refuse treatment that you don’t want hit you don’t have the right to demand and receive any treatment that you want.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:39 AM
4

Nope, they don’t at all. Both parents have an equal say. The world is unfair. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:31 AM
2

Read the thread, these points have been addressed
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:30 AM
2

Do no harm? Don’t abort babies because people make bad decisions then. The point is you can demand surgeries and procedures as an adult and not get them. You don’t control what medical treatment you get. Doctors do. Bodily autonomy means you can opt to NOT have procedures you don’t want. It doesn’t mean you can demand them. They don’t have to have any of those medical procedures. Birth isn’t a medical procedure. lol, nursing student doesn’t understand difference between refusing medical procedur…
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:28 AM
2

Her body is just a clump of cells too. That’s exactly what a body is. A clump of cells. So it’s not just her body we are discussing. There’s another body inside hers. So is someone in a coma not a person anymore because they are not conscious or consenting? Or they don’t have a body? Um, looks like you are wrong https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780686/ If a patient wants their leg amputated because it’s got a graze on it, is a doctor obliged to perform that? Its their body right?
/r/MensRights04/06/24 12:51 AM
10

Not true at all. Children need parents permission to have certain medical procedures performed on them. And doctors can refuse to perform surgeries on patients if they don’t believe they are necessary. Bodily autonomy doesn’t mean you get to demand any medical procedure you want without another person agreeing to it. So if doctors are required to assess the father’s wishes by law then they can absolutely refuse to perform abortions on that basis.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 10:10 PM
10

See, the problem is it’s not just her body. There’s another body with separate DNA, half of which came from the father, that is the issue here. So I don’t buy any of the ‘it’s my body’ crap. If the father desperately wants the baby and is prepared to raise his child by himself then in countries with abortion the mother can still just kill the child, often without even needing to tell him, despite what the father wants. Thats fucked up. The other way to equalize abortion rights is nobody can abor…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 10:06 PM
29

I also don’t understand why men can’t have have equal reproductive rights. You should need BOTH parents permission to perform an abortion, not just one
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:51 PM
1

Right, so CEOs of big companies should be 80%+ male then. Anyone can do anything. Doesn’t mean they are actually good or it’s optimal
/r/MensRights03/06/24 12:16 PM
1

What’s ‘acceptable’? Judged by what and by who?
/r/MensRights03/06/24 03:46 AM
23

Another clueless woman who doesn’t understand that males and females are different but wants to femsplain to us. She can fuck right off.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 05:22 AM
1

Why would it be 50/50? Why would any job be 50/50 when virtually any skill, trait or attribute you can measure will either favour men or women? Fighter pilots at the most basic level need a lot of aggression. Men are a lot more aggressive than women so a lot of women would hate that job whilst more men would be into it. So why would that be 50/50? It’s important we remember there’s a lot of tasks that both genders are capable of doing but one gender is far better at it at an elite level. For exa…
/r/MensRights30/05/24 12:30 AM
1

I totally agree with everything you write here. The size and strength differences are obvious to see and obvious to know what it matters for fighting, so we shouldn’t have equality in those areas. But when you assume other areas could be 50/50, like piloting, that only works if there are no other differences between men and women apart from size and strength. And that’s ridiculous, virtually every test of ability, personality or capability that we do shows differences between men and women. So w…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 07:30 PM
2

It’s not a question about whether they were involved or helpful. It’s a question about whether we want equality or not. It’s inconsistent to only want equality when it suits you, which exactly what feminism does. Cherry picks favorable situations and demands equality in those but is happy for inequality to exist when it benefits women. So do you think we should have equality or not?
/r/MensRights28/05/24 09:50 PM
1

It is if the alternative is dying
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:38 AM
1

Or you fight and win against the invaders. Ou don’t think fighting in defence is a gendered issue?
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:30 AM
1

lol lots of invaders don’t take surrenders bro. Just all get slaughtered equally with no fight then huh?
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:18 AM
1

Well I live in an island country miles from anywhere so if we get invaded most people can’t run. So what should happen if my country or countries like us gets invaded?
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:15 AM
2

If women and men both weren’t forced but could choose to fight, do you think those choosing to stay would be 50% men and 50% women?
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:11 AM
3

Equality means either everyone goes or no one goes. Men forced to fight but women can leave is sexist
/r/MensRights27/05/24 11:57 PM
3

Do you want equality between the sexes or not?
/r/MensRights27/05/24 10:52 PM
1

I agree with you. That’s how the world does work and should work. But the reality is that’s not equality that the feminists are always taking about, which doesn’t exist.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 10:47 PM
-2

As would I and most men. Because we understand there is no real equality between the sexes.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 10:44 PM
10

Because they have the same right to vote they should have the same responsibility right?
/r/MensRights27/05/24 10:43 PM
11

Except it’s not equality. Equality is women do 50% of the fighting and dying and men doing 50% of the nursing and supply chains. Or do you not believe in equality?
/r/MensRights27/05/24 10:42 PM
9

Kind of tough when feminism blames men for all of the problems in the world. What’s the evil system called that needs dismantling? Patriarchy. Feminism had never done anything for men. Men do need to man up and be in charge. We don’t want feminized and weak.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 06:01 AM
1

When they say should ‘we’ stop men congregating who do they mean by ‘we’? Women are too going to stop men? Um, no. Men are going to stop men? Really? I don’t think so
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:47 AM
18

That’s nothing like what they are saying. Stop looking for something to be offended about
/r/MensRights17/05/24 07:21 PM
22

What’s risk a bear in the wild attacks you? What’s the risk a man in the wild attacks you? Anyone who understands the world understands how stupid these childish women are
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:50 AM
13

Which shows they are idiots with no idea about the real world and no ability to think critically
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:49 AM
1

People are toxic. Behaviours are toxic. Trying to smear that across all of men or masculinity is toxic.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:02 AM
10

Do you know what a bear is?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:15 PM
1

You’re conflating group statistics with individual situations. It’s a fact the groups without fathers are going to fare worse on average. But this doesn’t mean every individual without a father is going to do poorly. If you disagree with them then talk to them about it. Not my problem
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:55 AM
1

You’re confusing behaviors with biology. You are a man exhibiting modern feminine behaviors of selfishness and ego centricity. Its not that complicated
/r/MensRights01/05/24 04:34 AM
2

You subscribing or not to reality has no impact on reality. It still exists. Your belief is not required. Man is a noun that describes a human adult male. You see are a man. Your acceptance is not required.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 02:17 AM
2

I don’t believe in God because I’m logical and rational and care about truth. Yes, there is something wrong with men being feminine: they aren’t women. And also with women being masculine. They aren’t men.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 01:11 AM
2

Right, you are feminine because you were primarily raised by a woman without your father in the house, so you don’t know what masculinity is. Women put themselves first. Men put women first. Like on the titanic. Yet apparently this is when women were ‘second class citizens’?? Go figure. So your mindset is feminine. Despite claiming you can ‘figure out masculinity for yourself’.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:09 AM
1

Not having a father is a massive negative and risk for anyone. The stats show that. Who said it was the be all, end all? If you replace ‘driving drunk’ with ‘not having a father’ in all of your arguments then 1) it makes exactly the same amount of sense and 2) it shows how poorly thought out your ‘arguments’ are. See you don’t even understand what masculinity is. Whenever women are in danger men step up and are prepared to sacrifice themselves for women. That’s masculinity. Men are the providers…
/r/MensRights30/04/24 11:32 PM
1

I didn’t say anything about mindset at all, so that’s totally irrelevant to my points. Say something actually meaningful instead of vague meaningless nonsense
/r/MensRights30/04/24 12:32 PM
1

1). Growing up without a father IS bad for boys and can lead to bad life outcomes. The stats clearly show that. You can’t minimize that fact by saying ‘don’t make excuses for it’. The stats show that ‘you don’t need a father just figure it out for yourself’ is nonsense. The stats also show that it can be overcome and it’s not prescriptive of bad outcomes. 2) I’ve literally never heard a single man use not having a father as an excuse. Again with the strawman nonsense
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:07 AM
1

No one believes that just because you don’t have a father in your life you are going to be a loser. Stop arguing against irrelevant strawmen you created
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:46 AM
1

As the original post is written you do have a point. But in reality, if that post replaced men/male with masculine then your point evaporates. So in reality you are playing gotcha word games with technicalities, because the person said male but meant masculine, rather than actually a valid point that contributes to the conversation. Which is something women tend to do. Who were you raised by again?
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:09 AM
1

Yeah this is total nonsense. Women can’t teach boys how to be men, because they don’t have any understanding of what it’s like to be a man. And no, boys can’t just ‘figure it out’ on their own because they have a penis. Every your whole worldview is very feminine. You say in response to an earlier post ‘why do you need someone to TELL you how to be a man if you’re already biologically male?’ It’s a great example of a feminine approach. Girls are verbal and need to be told. Boys don’t need to be …
/r/MensRights30/04/24 03:24 AM
2

Won’t they have to define what a woman is to enact this law?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:31 AM
0

Then why did you just talk about ‘this election’ with no reference to what election you are talking about at all?? There’s loads of elections around the world. Your post makes no sense.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 11:30 PM
0

You know there’s a world beyond America right?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:43 PM
4

‘Shallow’ is just language women use to shame men’s natural preferences. Especially the fat ugly ones I’ve noticed
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:59 AM
2

So …. You’d run away and lose your country.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:39 AM
1

You can’t. Time to grow up.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:37 AM
5

Yep it’s shockingly small. And yes it was in an article carrying on about how awesome and brave these women were
/r/MensRights26/04/24 01:36 AM
17

The government forced men to stay and fight and die whilst women got to leave. That’s not equality. You seem to suggesting women stay behind to operate in support roles? That’s not equality. The only real equality is women have to stay and be on the front line next to men. Otherwise equality doesn’t exist.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 01:03 AM
8

So when you country gets invaded your solution is to run away?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 01:00 AM
1

About 60,000 women choose to stay and fight in Ukraine while millions fled.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 12:59 AM
6

With women obviously
/r/MensRights15/04/24 03:34 AM
23

I think femsplaining has a better ring to it. The problem is most feminists aren’t very feminine 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights15/04/24 03:33 AM
16

No, he shouldn’t have. If someone uses violence against you then you need to respond with reasonable force, not minimum force. If he releases her that quickly there’s every chance she attacks him again so he’s justified in holding on.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:10 PM
0

I’m not through it yet but it’s fascinating
/r/MensRights09/04/24 11:50 PM
13

https://fee.org/articles/harvard-study-gender-pay-gap-explained-entirely-by-work-choices-of-men-and-women/
/r/MensRights09/04/24 11:49 PM
9

Modelling and Porn are two examples of industries where women are paid more. And not just a little bit more, multiples more.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 11:47 PM
56

The issue is the gender bias here. If a physically small man attacked a larger man and got punched no one cares. But if it’s a woman of the same size then suddenly they shouldn’t get punched? Why? What about if a large women attacks a man, should she get punched? You’re also totally missing the point. Small men don’t attack large men because they know there are consequences. Women attack men because they feel like there aren’t consequences. If women knew they would get punched the same as a man …
/r/MensRights09/04/24 10:15 PM
6

Pretty sure having some things in common doesn’t mean we are the same. I didn’t say we don’t have things in common. I said we aren’t the same. It’s a fact.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 06:12 AM
1

None of these are toxic masculinity. Men bullying each other can be good. And it can be bad. Again, depends on the individual and the behaviours. Homophobia isn’t part of masculinity. Lots of masculine behaviours are misunderstood by women and feminine men and are called toxic by people who don’t know what they are talking about.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 02:02 AM
17

Totally disagree. Men spend a lot of time trying to understand women for dating purposes so I think there’s a lot of men who understand women well. Women never have to understand men at all, so they don’t. Stop thinking men and women are the same. We aren’t
/r/MensRights02/04/24 12:06 AM
3

Those are toxic behaviours not toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:55 PM
1

Nothing. There are toxic people and toxic behaviour but nothing in masculinity is toxic. Doesn’t exist.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:53 PM
1

If it’s based on physical capabilities then more men will end up in the front lines than women. By a long way.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:49 AM
1

I don’t think it’s equality if men are on the front lines as grunts dying and the women have cruisy jobs in comms and supply chain. That’s not equality. I also don’t think it’s good having women on front line as they aren’t as good at fighting as men are. Or at carrying a 120lb pack.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:56 AM
3

That’s exactly right. Bang on
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:53 AM
9

The good thing about dating feminists is that they are quick to jump into bed because it’s ‘empowering’ so it’s an easy shag. It’s also not too hard to set up a ‘come round for a shag’ situation without having to spend any real time with them and get annoyed by their nonsense. Having 2-4 of them on rotation for such a purpose is optimal. Until they get too annoying then eventually you have to ditch her and move on to the next
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:25 AM
2

You can’t fix the world my bro. You can only control you. I want a partner to stay at home and raise the kids, and I earn enough money to do so. I always pay for all the dates to set the expectations right from the start. If she wasn’t raised to be a housewife or is into feminist nonsense and argues with you about wanting to pay then she ain’t the one for you so you move on.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 07:46 PM
8

So is it sexist when feminists don’t talk about sexism against men? They clearly haven’t thought much about it lol. I’d ignore them, they are upset over actual equality and don’t have a leg to stand on.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 09:27 PM
23

So is taking a dump. Doesn’t mean you should just do it anywhere or there are no consequences for doing it in front of the wrong people.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 05:42 PM
9

You can be a lesbian trans-woman? If you feel like it that is.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 06:44 PM
6

So not equal then
/r/MensRights14/03/24 02:41 PM
-3

The problem is women are much worse soldiers than men are. Great it’s equal but in reality will weaken their fighting forces a lot.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 07:25 AM
1

Right. So then there’s no proof the conclusion is true.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 06:52 PM
1

Well your confidence is nice but do you have any actual data that shows agreeing with these statements leads to sexual violence?
/r/MensRights13/03/24 08:13 AM
1

Depending on what they mean by ‘in power’, you’re talking about a tiny fraction of 1% of men that is irrelevant to almost everyone who isn’t in power. There’s millions more men in prison and being homeless than there are women. The fact there might be a few hundred more male CEOs doesn’t offset that. I also don’t accept the ‘men have more political power and are more likely to be world leaders’ argument. Women have had the vote for generations and have more votes in than men in most countries as…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 07:25 PM
1

Is that what I said?
/r/MensRights06/03/24 09:50 PM
11

What’s worse is those women in Ukraine voted for people who made decisions that contributed to them getting involved in a war. Then don’t have to face the consequences of those decisions. Why are people granted the right to vote without the responsibility to face the consequences of those decisions.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 05:36 AM
6

Those last 3 words confuse people. Especially those brainwashed by feminism.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 03:41 AM
7

No, I am saying men don’t have the right to abort their babies. Or have any say over whether the women does. So not letting women abort babies gives them the same legal rights as men in this regard. You know what I’m saying, you’re just dishonestly reframing it. And you also know women are both anti abortion and involved in the process to restrict abortion, so saying it’s ’men taking away women’s rights’ is false. Your emotional rants aren’t an argument
/r/MensRights05/03/24 11:39 PM
11

I have 16 upvotes (and counting) because I’ve made logical, factual statements. If you disagree with me then refute my statements or make your own rational arguments to counter my points. Emotional rants don’t get you very far.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 11:35 PM
8

Why should they have that right? Should that right (to vote) be contingent on accepting that responsibility (conscription for overseas wars and barred from leaving if your country is attacked)?
/r/MensRights05/03/24 11:31 PM
12

Is it? If women have a right that men don’t and it’s equalized so that both sexes have the same rights isn’t that a good thing? Or is that only the case when men’s rights are superior to women age we equalized those? Also it was men and women that equalized those rights. Not just men. Plenty of women are anti-abortion and there were definitely women involved in those processes. Leave the emotion out and stick to the facts
/r/MensRights05/03/24 09:04 PM
47

Is it a good thing that women have the right to vote? A vote used to be one for the family, and splitting the votes was part of the degradation of the family unit that has had massive societal consequences today. Women always had a political voice before they had the vote, especially on topics seen as women’s topics such as anything relating to children. Many women didn’t want the vote at the time, for these and other reasons. A vote also could mean conscription, which most women didn’t want. We…
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:47 PM
13

These things you bring up aren’t an imbalance of rights between the genders. Men don’t have the right to abort their children. Men don’t have paternity leave when women don’t. Feminism isn’t about equality it’s a women’s advocacy movement, as you’ve just proved
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:32 PM
1

Saying things is not speech? Um, yes it is. Literally. By definition. Speech is not violence. This is something only said by people who have no experience of violence. And some countries are retarded lol.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 02:42 AM
1

Getting feelings hurt is exactly what it is and it’s not illegal in any country lol. Your post hurt my feelings so maybe you should be arrested? Also you asked what I thought the law should be. And I told you. Speech is not violence. Violence is violence.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 04:26 AM
1

No. People getting their feelings hurt is not violence. Physical harm is illegal. Emotional harm is not, because it’s subjective and impossible to police.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 07:12 PM
1

Those women are idiots. Recognizing the sexes are different is not sexist. Misogyny today just means you disagree with feminists, rather than hate women. In which case all rational people are misogynists
/r/MensRights20/02/24 10:39 PM
1

If you don’t look at data and assess rational arguments then you don’t care about truth. It’s very clear women cheating is worse because of basic biology.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 10:37 PM
1

Yes, my analogy highlights the exception does not prove the rule. Going back to why I made that point, you were choosing extreme cheating examples to try and prove the rule, which is the same as using extreme strength examples in my analogy. Doesn’t work. Glad we finally got there. Firstly, how do you know it’s the exception not the rule? Do you have any data that shows how common this is? Remembering we are only talking about situations where the women cheats and is caught or owns up. What perc…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 10:36 PM
1

All of that is totally irrelevant to my analogy, which works perfectly.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 07:21 PM
0

I mean this is generally in line with what I’m saying, so I agree. The only part I don’t fully agree with is that it’s not equally important for men and women. Leaders need a higher level of emotional self control than followers. Men are stronger so emotional self control is a safety issue that it’s not for women. Also society tend me to punish men for lack of emotional control, for example crying in the wrong place or at the wrong time, whereas women who have low emotional self control usually …
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:59 PM
1

Yes, losing control of your emotions is weak. I didn’t say showing emotions is weak. Strong men are in control of how and when their emotions are expressed, even when angry, and also who it comes out in front of. Expressing anger directed towards your women, which is what I believed the OP was talking about, isn’t a good idea. Expressing anger towards someone attacking or threatening your woman is a great idea, as long as it’s proportional and not directed at someone she cares about. Men need a …
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:52 PM
-4

You aren’t really wrong in what you’re saying you just haven’t applied it correctly. In this case here the guy was expressing anger towards his wife. That is specifically what I am saying is not a good idea. Expressing anger towards people threatening your family or insulting your wife is not a bad idea and could well make a women more attracted to you. Women want physical, financial and emotional security from men. You expressing anger towards her erodes that security. You expressing anger towa…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:37 PM
0

So they are learning the importance of emotional control from having a man in the house. Whereas men without that don’t. Which was my point…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:18 PM
-8

Give me any data that demonstrates any causality between men being called weak and suicide rates. I explicitly said in my post it’s ok for men to express emotions, but they need to be control of how that comes out and who it’s in front of. Never cry in front of your girl. Never have loud emotional angry outbursts in front of women. Doing so is weak as you are losing control.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:13 PM
-16

Men need good emotional control and self regulation. Prison is filled with men who don’t have these things, usually raised without dads around to teach them this. Annoyance is ok, but you should not be showing anger in front of your wife. You’ve lost control and that makes you weak. It’s ok to feel emotions and to express them, but do it in a calm and controlled way. And don’t express all of your emotions to women. Be very selective. Don’t listen to women that tell you how to act. They don’t und…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 09:10 AM
20

Do you mean equalizing rights so that men and women have the same abortion rights? I thought feminists wanted equal rights for women?
/r/MensRights20/02/24 05:12 AM
2

Where did I say it’s more likely a women cheating results in a pregnancy? I mean it’s a pretty simple analogy but you obviously don’t get it so let me step you through it. The vast majority of the time men are stronger than women and finding a few exceptions with an exceptionally strong woman and weak man doesn’t change that. The vast majority of the time women cheating is worse than men cheating, because it brings the origin of their own children (or future children) into doubt, and finding a f…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 05:03 AM
1

Once again, I didn’t say cheating equals reproduction. Constantly arguing against things I didn’t say just makes it obvious you can’t address what I am saying. And now you’re arguing based on the exception not the rule, which is meaningless. For example, if I say men are stronger than women, then you highlighting one very strong woman may be stronger than a very weak man doesn’t invalidate the general statement that men are stronger than women. Its like you have no concept of logic and critical …
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:24 PM
1

It’s not a whole other issue. It’s an outcome of cheating. Yes, it wouldn’t be as bad.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 10:41 PM
1

I didn’t say cheating existed in biology. I said the impact of cheating is different between the genders because of biology. Totally different claims lol. You’re just making an argument from popularity. Truth is not dependent on how many people believe something. Of you can’t make good rational arguments then logical fallacies is all you have left.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 08:00 PM
1

Biology is relevant when it comes to sex and reproduction, therefore it matters with cheating. Me laying out rational reasons why those people are wrong is hypocrisy? Explain that one to me lol.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:40 PM
2

First of all a baby switch is not the same thing. Your baby still exists and is out there. You may get your reconnect with them. Totally different. Secondly, a baby switch is an error by a stranger. That’s not comparable to a betrayal and years of lying from the person you are married to. Thirdly, even if you find out eventually that your children are still yours, the risk and immediate stress and worry adds an extra layer of pain and hurt that women don’t have to go through. Of course you would…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:28 PM
1

https://youtu.be/UH9fnRnEcr0?si=0D1ADU6MxHdemih2
/r/MensRights19/02/24 06:26 PM
1

I did mean that. Men can be made to pay for a child they can prove isn’t theirs in some states and countries. You are wrong. https://www.petrellilaw.com/paternity-by-estoppel-could-you-be-forced-to-pay-child-support-for-your-exs-child/#:~:text=You%20could%20be%20ordered%20to,v.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 06:20 PM
1

Can you imagine the heart wrenching loss of finding out your kids that you’ve loved and cared for their whole lives aren’t actually yours? And never will be. Now imagine adding that pain on top of the pain and betrayal of cheating, and all happening at the same time. There’s no doubt which is worse.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 06:17 PM
1

No, the betrayal is not equal. There is nothing that a man can do that can bring doubt over whether your kids are actually yours or not. Nothing. Women don’t understand this issue because it’s a risk they don’t face and don’t have to worry about. Can you imagine the heart wrenching loss of finding out your kids that you’ve loved and cared for their whole lives aren’t actually yours? And never will be. Now imagine adding that pain on top of the pain and betrayal of cheating that you experienced, …
/r/MensRights19/02/24 06:11 PM
0

Totally irrelevant. You claimed men could never be liable for child support on a child that’s not theirs. That is false. Stop it with the ‘yes, but…’ trying to change the topic and brush over your error.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 06:01 PM
0

Sorry, infidelity is what I meant to type. Women cheating brings doubt as to whether it’s a Manx child. Man cheating does not bring doubt as to whether it’s a woman’s child. Therefore women cheating is worse. It’s really simple.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 05:58 PM
1

No, it’s not equally awful. In the real world men and women are biologically different, which is highly relevant when it comes to sex. Everyone can ruin lives. So that’s not relevant. But the impact and betrayal of a woman cheating is far worse. The real world isn’t 50/50 on everything.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 05:55 PM
1

If you have a blended family it’s either because the woman has chosen to have a baby out of wedlock or she has chosen to leave her husband, the vast majority of the time. Women have all of the power and options when it comes to birth control, but also who they have sex with. I never said women should be ok with it. I said the betrayal is worse.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 05:51 PM
2

Women initiate 80% of divorces. So who is to blame for single moms and blended families? Overwhelmingly the woman
/r/MensRights19/02/24 03:59 AM
2

Your unverified anecdotes aren’t relevant to grown up conversations. It’s not all about you. You aren’t the main character.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 03:49 AM
8

You raised the irrelevant point of how bad absent fatherhood is. So I addressed it. Selfish modern women. I agree it’s irrelevant, but then why raise it?
/r/MensRights19/02/24 03:09 AM
8

Well, on that my point is that modern women (who initiate 80% of divorces) are selfishly putting their own happiness above their children’s welfare. Traditional women would put their kids first. Modern women don’t.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:39 AM
15

That’s got nothing to do with the paternity or maternity of a couples children. Finding out your children aren’t actually yours due to cheating is a much worse financial, legal and moral situation than finding out your partner fathered another kid. A kid you don’t know, don’t have a relationship with and have no financial or legal liability for. No reasonable person could argue otherwise
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:23 AM
12

You stated men don’t have to pay child support for children that aren’t there’s. That is factually wrong. You were wrong. Why not just acknowledge the mistake?
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:20 AM
4

So then I’m right. Cheers
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:19 AM
6

But men’s infertility is less immoral. Because it doesn’t bring maternity of children into doubt. You can not like it or get upset about it, but men and women are different due to biology. Biology matters.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:18 AM
6

None of those undo what I said above. The betrayal by a women is far worse than the betrayal of a man due to the paternity issue. The fact it’s easier for women to cheat doesn’t change that.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:16 AM
11

Yes they are. There are states and countries in which men are still liable for child support even if it’s proven the child if not biologically theirs.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 10:47 PM
15

Absolutely 👍
/r/MensRights18/02/24 10:46 PM
5

The difference is I’m saying relevant things with a clear logic to reach my conclusion. And you’re just saying stuff
/r/MensRights18/02/24 10:45 PM
16

So then women cheating is worse, for the reasons you outline
/r/MensRights18/02/24 08:44 PM
68

Not true. A cheating woman brings paternity of the children into doubt. A cheating man doesn’t bring the maternity of children into doubt. Therefore women cheating is objectively morally worse, due to biology.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 08:42 PM
0

First of all your premise that someone with criminal convictions can’t be a role model is clearly false. There are many examples to the contrary. Secondly, he doesn’t even have any criminal convictions in those matters lol.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 06:14 PM
2

It doesn’t matter why it is. It’s still hypocrisy to body shame him and get upset over body shaming women.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 02:27 AM
0

But he clearly is. So you’re wrong
/r/MensRights15/02/24 02:23 AM
1

Understandable that free speech doesn’t exist? In what world is that ok??
/r/MensRights15/02/24 02:23 AM
20

What do you mean by ‘the elite’? How specifically is it structured to not be welcoming for women? You’re making very broad and high level statements that make it hard for me to tell what you’re actually talking about or what you see the issues as. Most people have been oppressed through history. Most people are excluded from the elite. These aren’t gender issues.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 12:35 AM
23

What rights or privileges do men have in 2024 that women don’t? You realise most men have been oppressed for generations too right?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 12:00 AM
65

Feminism isn’t about equal rights for women. It’s a women’s advocacy movement. Nothing wrong with women’s advocacy, it’s just dishonest packaging to say it’s about equal rights
/r/MensRights11/02/24 11:57 PM
1

https://www.stuff.co.nz/timaru-herald/news/81025573/domestic-violence-study-presents-challenging-picture
/r/MensRights06/02/24 06:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter