TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RoflCopter4 Archive

View 1 post and 34 comments by RoflCopter4 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

RoflCopter4/r/MensRights25/12/11 10:29 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

This post is ingenious.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:57 AM
4

Because it is, by definition, victim blaming, and unacceptable.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:59 PM
3

When did I ever mention trolling? Or anything similar? That out of context quote you procured was blatantly satirical and sarcastic. I'm sorry you missed that.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 12:14 AM
2

Good to see you are aware of context. That was utterly sarcastic, it was making fun of both the stupid thing the OP had said, and also the notion contained in that quote. You people stoop pretty low sometimes, you're trying to get offended.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 02:33 PM
1

Prove it. I sound like a bigot? You're the one claiming that you are part of a group of people that is better than the rest is Reddit.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 10:45 AM
4

No, that wasn't logic. You called half of Redditors idiots, and somehow made the claim that SRS is exempt to this. No, SRS does not show this. Prove it does. From what I've seen, it's a feminist circlejerk of hatred.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 10:00 AM
1

Oh god, I winced.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 09:58 AM
2

Yes, the people in SRS are pretty stup-- Oh, that's not what you were saying. Ah, I see.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 09:45 AM
1

You best be joking.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 08:40 AM
-4

Can't the two groups come together?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:06 AM
-3

It's a big circle of stupidity. Try not to out-stupid the other side.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:06 AM
-1

That is precisely how feminists seem to think.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:01 AM
-1

I think it's far safer to say we think feminism is no longer necessary, and needs to go away. What more can feminism achieve? Wouldn't it be far more useful for people to be humanist? To promote rights for all people, rather than the subgroup in which they belong? This is our biggest quip with it, it concerns only itself, when people really shouldn't be so selfish about rights.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:49 AM
3

Posts like this make us all look bad.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:24 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/npbsn/the_choice_was_made_now_live_with_it737_or_man_is/c3avw69?context=3 Sorry for lateness.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:11 AM
1

I can tell you with complete honesty, I would be a lot more open minded if people weren't calling me a whiny racist baby based on a post taken out is context.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 05:07 AM
11

Hmm, nice to see a reply. Should I now go to SRS and find some examples of highly upvoted misandry?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 04:41 AM
6

No, but you see, it was the evil patriarchal society that taught her to lie like this. Its not her fault at all!!! /sarcasm
/r/MensRights26/12/11 04:38 AM
1

You're not getting my point. Anger and hate in /r/atheism are exceptions. Anger and hate are the only things in SRS.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 04:34 AM
4

Point out a couple of examples.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 04:32 AM
2

I do read a lot of /r/atheism, and the majority of discussion is not bullying, they discuss a point of view based on logic and fairness. I've never seen logic nor fairness on SRS. Necessary evil is a bad way of going about a point of view, it masks it in the hate it presents. Atheists hate religion, not religious people. SRS clearly hates all men, not misogyny by men.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 04:15 AM
2

Its quite alright. At that though, I can't help but notice that you didn't attempt to refute any other part of my previous argument. Do you have any thoughts on it?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:43 AM
3

Of course I understand what you're saying, and what you're trying to do, but I still disagree with your methods. Please compare to /r/atheism, where religion is regarded generally yhr same way as misogyny is regarded at SRS. The difference is, despite some angry people whom I ignore, /r/atheism does not seek to force theists into seeing their point of view through low, quasi-satirical bullying and hate, they present their point of view, provide evidence, and ask you, knowing the evidence, if you…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:33 AM
3

I tend to speak formally on the internet, when speaking about any intellectual topic. I'm sorry if it is off putting. I have not been downvoting you, I only downvote spam and hate messages, not arguments I disagree with.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:06 AM
5

I appreciate the time and care you put into that post, its a shame I don't have the time to do so myself. You make the claim that Reddit is misogynistic, which is perhaps true, and that justifies being equally misandric and hateful (what they're doing is not teasing) in return. This is quite hypocritical in my, and in many other people's, eyes, and defies justification. I must ask you too, why do you feel the need to police Reddit of sexism? Sure, Reddit makes dumb, insensitive, even mean jokes.…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 02:45 AM
3

My grammar was correct. "WITH which they disagree" not "which which." Your example ended a sentence with a preposition, which is frowned upon. As well, I was under the impression that "not a true Scotsman" was a single noun, perhaps I was wrong. I am typing on my phone as well, which is always prone to errors. You are not correct with your statement about banning, through basic observation it is strikingly clear that they ban anyone with whom they disagree, as they did with me. I was being very …
/r/MensRights26/12/11 02:34 AM
7

The admins ban anyone who presents an opinion with which they do not agree. This is utterly unacceptable, and unforgivable. The rest of your argument is a prime example of not a true scottsman.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 02:14 AM
4

Are you implying its okay for them to be hateful and sexist?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 02:09 AM
11

This does not change nor lessen the uselessness of this hateful subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 02:07 AM
2

It's their general hateful attitude and closed mindedness that gets me. Its sick.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 12:14 AM
2

Meh, SRS seems worse than what I can tell from glancing through this subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:43 PM
4

I simply don't understand this behavior. Why do they think it's okay to force people into their beliefs? They literally say anyone with different beliefs as them is a closed minded sexist fuck. Do they not grasp the hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:19 PM
19

I'm less concerned about the Karma I lost (and it was a quite a lot) than I am shocked at the amount of hatred there is there. I was raised to believe (by my feminist mother) that women are literally equals, and feminists want to bring equality to both sexes. If we all just get along everyone would be much happier. Their entire attitude pisses on everything I was raised to believe.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:04 PM
7

I sincerely tried to have a calm, rational argument about what I said that offended them. Somebody said something that basically implied that all men are dicks, and I called this misandry. My comment was linked to SRS and I was called a whiny sexist racist baby. When I asked them why they did this, they literally made up arguments from nowhere, made up and ignored all context, and thus made it seem as though I was calling lesbians misandric for not being attracted to men. Everything I said was d…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 10:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter