TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RogerSmithOnDrugs Archive

View 1 post and 65 comments by RogerSmithOnDrugs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

FeminismRogerSmithOnDrugs/r/MensRights27/11/18 12:59 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It didn't sound like she was disparaging the boy, but merely offering condolences to someone who lost a close election.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:06 AM
-2

Except it doesn't; women abusing or killing their children are a minute minority. Unironically co-opting terrible feminist logic just makes this sub look like misogynists with an axe to grind. Nobody on the outside will realise you're doing it to criticize feminist tactics, and nobody with a brain on the inside cares.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:34 PM
1

I'm banned from r/feminism, so no. The MRM has a bad rep, and it's not helped by posting random female crimes that have nothing to do with anything. The main reason I initially complained though, is that this literally has nothing to do with this sub. Women commit crimes too; shocker.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 02:58 PM
4

You legit sound mentally damaged
/r/MensRights15/12/18 02:15 PM
5

You give r/mensrights a bad name.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 02:11 PM
10

Ah Ireland, how I love thee.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/18 02:10 PM
6

Don't become r/feminism
/r/MensRights15/12/18 02:06 PM
5

This is related to men's rights how?
/r/MensRights15/12/18 01:37 PM
3

A violent, abusive person viciously assaults someone, and you have the audacity to complain that they ended up kicking their ass? Jesus, you're fucking sexist.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/18 04:19 AM
1

What the fuck am I watching?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 11:26 PM
-6

Wtf, this is r/MensRights, not r/misogyny
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:38 PM
3

Someone replace the groups with racial groups and see how it reads...
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:53 AM
1

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/03/how-big-average-penis That even says 5.16 inches!
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:52 PM
3

Naw, many studies have it at more like 5.5.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:50 PM
3

If they're standard requirements for women, then a lot must be very disappointed. The average for all of those things is less than 6.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:48 PM
94

It's only going to get worse. Sexism against men is coming into fashion, and sexism in favor of women is already the hot thing. I predict that in ten years there will be significant workplace sexism against men, that will only subside after many high profile legal battles.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:05 PM
10

It's also not a great defense unless all consented acts are specified, and you get a follow up video afterwards. They could withdraw consent during the act, or he could do something she didn't consent to (e.g. anal).
/r/MensRights01/12/18 12:06 PM
21

The daily mail is playing the "let's scour Twitter to find a dozen people upset at something"
/r/MensRights28/11/18 12:26 PM
2

Wasn't it from like cloned stem cells, originally from a foreskin? Rather than like harvesting foreskins?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 06:56 PM
19

Dude, as someone who found the original post, it 100% sounds like she was raped twice (maybe more, I stopped reading). The second time was straight up drugging and raping someone. Even if you ignore that, the guy would upskirt grope his girlfriend in public, and immediately leave if she asked him politely to stop. The guy is a sack of shit based on that alone. I'm not sure why you posted this here and what your agenda is, cos it's very hard for me to believe you read that post and didn't think s…
/r/MensRights24/11/18 05:54 PM
1

Woman on social media != feminists.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:59 PM
14

I regret selling my car; brb, gonna file a police report for its theft.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:52 PM
1

From 2017; better article here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2017/08/11/jury-orders-blogger-to-pay-8-4-million-to-ex-army-colonel-she-accused-of-rape/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.de399588534e
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:52 AM
0

I can't backpeddle from something I never advocated. Please get rid of your black and white thinking, where things either have to be one extreme or another.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 09:18 PM
0

Complete outcast is not the option I'm advocating for. Please go back to school and brush up on your reading comprehension. And no, Americans are not all sex offenders. He wasn't just called a "sex offender" - he was sent to prison and put on the register. You can make valid points about the register being unnecessarily inflated, but grooming a fourteen year old isn't a situation where that applies.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:57 PM
0

There's not much point in even talking to you, if you either pretend to, or simply can't grasp any options between: a) Make him a complete outcast. b) Kill him. c) Completely accept him for any and every role in life, completely ignoring his conviction for predatory behaviour towards a fourteen year old. It's ironic that you bring up female sex offenders, since you probably wouldn't have any problem with this story if the person was a woman. Bonus points to you, for thinking that not showing a c…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:36 PM
0

If people don't want to interact with someone who tries to fuck 14 year olds, that is their choice. There's a pretty easy way to avoid that - don't try to fuck a 14 year old.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:11 PM
4

Or he could change profession. I mean, if he was a teacher what would happen? He'd obviously never be employed working with kids again.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:57 PM
6

I don't, but his potential employers do.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:13 PM
3

I love how the DUP are such a small party, yet get a disproportionate amount of the abuse. I'm not condoning abusive language, but the DUP are such assholes.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:57 AM
9

If you commit a sexual offence, being in a highly visible public role probably ain't gonna happen.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:55 AM
7

I was using that word in the sense of "he appears in it". Also, it's a bit more than being an extra if he's interacting with one of the stars. It's kind of irrelevant though; he could be standing in a crowd in the background, and I'd have the same opinion.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:32 AM
1

I would prefer to have him continue his life and become a productive member of society. That doesn't mean he needs to appear in major Hollywood movies, or that a studio will want him in their movie.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:23 AM
12

If someone was caught trying to groom a 14 y/o for sex online, it's not overly appropriate to feature them in major Hollywood movies.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:22 AM
4

Apparently the guy was in crisis and an ambulance called. I'm guessing that means he was having some kind of mental breakdown. The reporter thought it would be a great idea to film this guy, nearly naked, cuffed, waiting to be loaded into an ambulance. The police told her it was a HIPAA violation, but she assumed they were mistreating the man and refused to respect his privacy.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:02 PM
5

I don't understand why a lot of people automatically believe Kesha; she has a clear financial motive to lie. People sometimes falsely accuse others for very little motive, so in this case I wouldn't be able to pick a side. Either Dr Luke is a heinous sociopath, or Kesha is. One isn't automatically more likely than the other, just because of gender.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:52 AM
2

Man that sub is a dumpster fire.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:44 AM
3

Yeah, the whole thing is excessive. I don't want to be unsupportive of him if he's being truthful, but I doubt this is real.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:04 PM
-10

No, if you read the article, he's clearly referring to her essentially having a mental breakdown and then trying to commit suicide.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 01:30 PM
1

Northern Ireland has a pay gap where women earning 4% more. Nobody says it's a problem or indicative of discrimination, because that would be stupid. I don't know why there's a 4% gap, but I'm not going to jump to conclusions and pretend to be a victim. It's the same with woman 30 and under out earning men.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 12:49 PM
2

This is standard for the BBC and isn't nefarious - they're quoting someone's opinions, so they always put things in "scare quotes".
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:23 PM
1

I work a 37.5 hour week, which is already considered "full time". 50 hours is an extra 2.5 hours a day.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:21 PM
3

Probs because urinals are space efficient.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:18 PM
2

Being concerned about the misandry of an influential journalist means you support Donald Trump?! I'm a centrist European yo.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:06 PM
10

"Don't drop the soap" can be slightly amusing, but this is just saying "all men in prison are of a high risk of rape". That's just sad and sobering.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 08:38 AM
1

Toxic cultures exist; it makes no sense to link them to a gender as a whole.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:41 PM
1

I would imagine that term is used as a response to show how silly and detrimental it is to link any negative behaviour by a man to masculinity as a whole.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:40 PM
1

Average is 5'10 so yeah. 5'4 is quite small. 5'9 is slightly below average.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:18 PM
1

Ball punches.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:15 PM
1

I was pleasantly surprised that she went the "not all [lonely] men are shitlords" route, although I bet she's a tight gatekeeper of the non-shitlord realm. If you don't think Trump is literally Hitler and defer to Laurie at all times, you're just a shitlord.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:31 PM
1

How would they know? Mandatory genital checks?
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:24 PM
1

Holy shit, they're charging £225 for an event that has no entertainment: - The main stage is an open stage for attendees to perform on. - They have skill learning tents, where volunteer attendees will share craft skills with others. - They have a tent where woman (attendees) share their stories.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:21 PM
4

They make Rhiannon Brooker sound like an innocent saint, yet the BBC sound clear cut in their reporting of her as a horrifically manipulative liar, who had a man falsely imprisoned for over a month, so she had an excuse for an exam failure. Someone is deluded in their reporting, and I'm guessing it's the one called "Buzzfeed".
/r/MensRights29/06/18 11:42 PM
2

Three of them were over the age of consent, so they weren't raped. If the other was like a year beneath, and she didn't know, it'd be pretty unfair to send her to jail. I'd have the same opinion if it was a dude.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 06:14 PM
3

And yet you feel entitled to say that you feel the evidence was strong. Based on what, your psychic powers? I felt that the evidence I heard and read about was compelling, while acknowledging that since there was 42 days in the trial, I wasn't privy to the same level of detail as the jury. You clearly don't understand legal standards. A "Not Guilty" verdict means more likely innocent than not, even if it is 50% plus a hair This is absurdly false. You could believe it was 85% likely someone was g…
/r/MensRights31/03/18 11:21 AM
3

By your own admission you didn't examine "the evidence", only the cherry-picked narrative that was published by the media. Since I didn't take time off work and manage to get a seat in the court's public gallery for forty two days, yes that is correct. In a legal system that has demonstratively overreached with regards to "sex crimes" it would be fair to say that they are more likely to be innocent than not. It really wouldn't. That's an overreach. You CAN say that the UK's courts and investigat…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 06:32 PM
2

Only one of the students were underage and it's claimed she didn't know this.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 12:30 PM
5

Not guilty != innocent. I found the evidence to be compelling, but obviously didn't sit in court for 42 days. I can't say they're guilty of rape, but I can't say they're innocent, or that the woman lied.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 12:21 PM
1

I don't think I've ever eaten in a restaurant and known the gender of the owner.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 02:47 PM
6

Plus, The Queen is a hugely desirable role that will make a career, so there will be more actresses wanting to do it, and willing to do it for less.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 02:42 PM
1

It was actually $700. I'd be pissed if they paid me $200 less than the going rate for a testicle.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:09 AM
1

Hey, you can't disown us that easily!
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/18 07:16 PM
15

NI First Minister and Deputy First Minister: women (before it all collapsed because yay Irish politics!)
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/18 10:49 PM
1

5:1 female to male ratio... I'll take that ;)
/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:59 PM
5

that men, by virtue of the fact that they are the dominating gender in society In my generation, women earn more than men and out attained them educationally. I don't really think there's a dominating gender in society. That is a concept that seems to have cropped up this decade, which seems bizarre to me.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter