TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RogueTrombonist Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by RogueTrombonist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

A private website deciding what content they want to allow is perfectly reasonable.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 10:18 PM
-1

I mean... is it his right to fuck her? I understand the point of this post - pointing out a double standard. But I don't think it's arrogant at all...
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:17 AM
1

It's probably hyperbole, but this is worth looking at: https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a#.13gbiyqpl Also, as anecdotal evidence, I am a bi guy who's pretty much 50-50 men-women. I use tindr. I probably match with about 1 percent of women and at least 70 percent of men. I'm also very selective with who I swipe right on when it comes to guys, whereas I just serial swipe with women. If …
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:13 AM
1

Again, you're straw manning me. Where did I say, "not count"? Why are you putting it into quotes? You can have more productive conversations if you actually read what they write/listen to what they say.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 12:52 AM
1

Are you deliberately straw manning me? I did not mention that comment in my entire post, as I was focusing on the actual links and posts rather than the comments. I was actually asking for sexists links on the sub and OPs, rather than comments. And nowhere did I argue that that comment was not sexist. You are right. There are sexist comments that make their way onto this sub, and that is one of them. IMO, OPs that are upvoted by the community are a better barometer for the general views of the s…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 08:54 PM
1

lul
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:22 AM
4

While all of these posts have some net upvotes, I would not say any of them were very popular for this sub. Most of the posts I see in the top of the "top" section have 100 upvotes at a minimum, with the most popular posts getting past 1,000 easily. The most upvotes any of the posts you linked has received is 34. But to go through each of your posts individually: The first post had deleted text, so I can't say exactly what the OPs complete point was, but it doesn't generalize white women or bash…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:19 AM
5

Honestly, I've seen very few upvoted posts recently that directly complain about straight white women. There is a lot more about double-standards, hypocrisy and injustices. Are you talking about posts, or comments? If you're talking about posts, would you mind linking examples that are analogous to the Buzzfeed example posted here?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 12:55 AM
2

I never really got this. I mean, it's a dating/hookup app. If someone wants to ask sexual questions and jump into a sexual conversation, why can't they? If you don't like that or would not like to get so sexual so quickly, you can say so, or block them, or do whatever you want. That's your prerogative. But why ridicule someone for being sexual on a hookup app?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 12:51 AM
1

Yeah, it's the norm. It's been falling off though, just not down to the levels of EU countries yet. Kind of like how the UK is getting fatter, but isn't as fat as the US yet.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:44 PM
1

I agree that consistency is important, e.g. if women can't consent while drunk then neither can men. However, even though this is a reductio ad absurdum argument, I don't think it really follows from the idea that alcohol makes women (or anyone) incapable of consent. Unless you think the fact that women can't consent while sleeping should prohibit them from, or limit their rights, to sleep.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:34 AM
3

I'm assuming this is a reductio ad absrudum type of argument?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 10:41 PM
3

Many assault/threats of violence laws are based on averages with this exact reasoning. An action can be considered assault in many US states if a reasonable person would or could feel threatened by it. It doesn't actually matter if the specific victim felt threatened. If I am threatened with a knife and the threat of bodily harm is credible I can press assault charges, even if for whatever reason I felt perfectly safe. If I feel threatened by a leashed, well-behaved dog in a public park, however…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:44 PM
7

I commented on a post asking about male sexual assault simply saying that I was also interesting in the question the OP was asking. I'm neither a men's rights activist nor a strong anti-feminist per-say - I just like to keep myself informed on different movements and political strains of thought. I did ask the mods and they responded! They said I was banned for "off-topic content". I was then muted by the moderator. If you read the rules, they can ban you for anything which doesn't reflect a "fe…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:14 PM
1

I think the reason many people don't want to be labelled feminist is because they believe it associates them with certain counterproductive or even sexist strains of feminist activism and thought. While they may agree that the goal of the dictionary definition of feminism (equality) is laudable, they think it impossible or not useful to use the term to refer only to this rather narrow definition.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:10 PM
1

OK then, some people need to take their car to work. But would you suggest that people never use a car or fly in a plane or use any kind of transportation for any recreational purpose? Should people never go on vacations, or travel, or visit family or drive to a restaurant because there is a "non-zero" chance of getting into an accident? Most things that make life worth living involve some risk. Managing that level of risk is important, and the argument that in some cases, the risks outweigh the…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:51 PM
2

What does this have to do with feminism...? This women lost her job 20 years ago because of her religious beliefs - which is terrible. I didn't read anything I could relate to feminism though.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 04:12 PM
1

There is no benefit to marriage for any man? Do all marriages end in divorce with one spouse paying an unreasonable amount in alimony? Also, there is a thing called a "prenup" - Google is your friend if you have not heard of it. I understand that alimony ruling can often be unfair, but to conclude from that that marriage is a bad idea for everyone is pretty absurd.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:10 PM
2

If you honestly think that nobody has anything to gain from being in any possible marital or domestic relationship, then sure, I guess... You're kind of proving Tortuga's point. You might as well say, "If you drive a car there's a non-0 chance of getting in an accident to where if you don't, there's a 0% chance of this happening. You have nothing to gain and everything to lose".
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:04 PM
1

By doing this work, they were investing in a better life though. By doing housework, balancing finances and taking care of children they enabled their spouse to get an education, build up experience or a business, climb the ladder, etc. and increase their income. EDIT: To be clear, I'm not saying someone is entitled to permanent contributions to maintain their lifestyle indefinitely. The "accustomed to a lifestyle" argument in general doesn't really make sense to me. I just think that if one spo…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 01:54 PM
4

If one doesn't spend their life not doing the work which would make them able to sustain themselves on their own, it doesn't mean the spouse should be on the hook to pay for that laziness. What if, rather than being "lazy", they were doing work that helped sustain their lifestyle and was clearly of value, but isn't really economically useful outside of the marriage?
/r/MensRights30/10/16 06:17 AM
7

The situation the OP is unjust and should be illegal if it isn't already. That being said, I don't have a problem with some alimony, provided that it is reasonable. To claim that, because someone didn't work for money during marriage, they did not contribute anything of economic value, is pretty ridiculous. If one partner takes care of domestic duties, raises the children, deals with taxes and finances, and provides other services for which they are not directly compensated for, while the other …
/r/MensRights30/10/16 06:14 AM
2

Or you could just criticize her for her hypocrisy and make that criticism as visible as possible.... Which is these kinds of things should be dealt with anyway....
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:23 PM
10

I'm not sure if your post is meant to be satire, but no, absolutely not. This kind of legislation and thinking is one of my main criticisms, and applying to men is pursuing equality in the wrong direction. People's sexist attitudes and thoughts, whether they're misogynist or misandrist, from mildly disrespectful to outright hateful, are more likely to change in an environment where they can be openly expressed and then challenged.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:16 PM
2

I saw this posted on r/feminism. I commented on the post (which was just an inquiry about what feminists had to say about this discrepancy between the way boys and girls are treated when sexually abused). I expressed interest as well, saying that (and I thought I phrased this pretty carefully) "I have heard some people claiming to be feminists dismiss the importance of male victims of sexual abuse", but that I didn't think most feminists thought this way so I was interested to see what the respo…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter