TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Roguta Archive

View 1 post and 251 comments by Roguta on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Roguta/r/MensRights26/08/14 12:37 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

They pretend to look for a conspiracy, while at the same time being guilty of the very same conspiracy themselves. Pathetic. And also typical.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 07:25 AM
7

The curing of cancer would probably be described as "a setback to women's equality," as different numbers of men and women suffer from different kinds of cancer (i. e. not equal). This is completely asinine. As the number and severity of actual issues goes down, the effort to find and/or invent any at all goes up.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 11:51 AM
10

Yes, this is exactly as stupid as it sounds. It's Buzzfeed, after all. It can be safely ignored. Not even worth a sigh.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 06:40 AM
3

The level of hipocrisy and complete and utter lack of self-awareness is staggerig, but does that surprise anyone at this point?
/r/MensRights24/02/20 07:18 AM
0

You dont't want to spend a second in these subs, migh as well get yourself banned. Really, you're not missing anything. It's the very bottom of the cesspool, where the insanity has crystallized into its purest form.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 07:22 AM
25

\Sensible chuckle** I don't see a reason to react to this in any way beyond that.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 09:41 AM
4

You don't deserve payment for maintaining your own home, where you and your family live. I still can't understand where this idea comes from.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:15 AM
1

What is even the point of this? Everyone already knows this is not the case, never was, never will be.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 09:05 AM
1

So do women. What's their point? The problem is the character of the individual, not their sex.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 06:39 AM
3

They literally have bots compiling lists of "undesirables" to auto-ban. If you weren't on it, you probably are now, just by making this one post.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 07:33 AM
2

I get where you're going with this, but... this is Reddit - where people are constantly looking for an outrage, going out of their way to shit on you in any way they can. The will go into your post history just to find something. Yes, there are some subs that are just an unmitigated disaster of complete idiocy, mouth-frothing hate and hipocrisy. I would suggest just don't go there. Don't go swimming in a cesspool and then wonder why you came out with a foul mood.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 07:30 AM
6

She's not sorry they intentionally hurt innocent people. She's sorry the got caught doing it.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 07:47 AM
2

The old "I'm holding a position that I'm ashamed of, but will never admit it" game. In order to ease her own conscience, she is trying rationalize it away by shifting the blame on you. Probably everyone is guilty of this kid of shit at some point. The important thing is to grow out of it eventually.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 08:17 AM
1

Yes, women, unlike men, are looking for status and success. And if they can get tall, intelligent and in shape as well, good for them. A guy like that has all the wiggle room in the world to choose whomeher he wants. What else is new?
/r/MensRights27/11/19 07:12 AM
16

People with views like this get promoted to managers in other tech companies as well. A guy I know from [redacted] views quotas as necessary to enact change. Exactly how will this change be for the better, he cannot explain.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 07:00 AM
1

Why did they post the position in the first place then, as they apparently don't need it?
/r/MensRights12/11/19 07:52 AM
716

This is proof of actual systemic oppression. Right there.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:01 AM
1

This is perfectly in line with 40k. I'm almost certain something like this is already going on somewhere in Warhammer 40k.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:37 AM
25

If you make an adult decision to voluntarily drink, you are still 100% responsible for your decisions and actions. Or - if you cannot take that "responsibility" - hand in your driver's license and your ID and have all decisions made for you by an actual adult (if only this was how it works). I can't believe there is any kind of discussion about this whatsoever. This is a non-question. There is no ambiguity here at all. None.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 06:44 AM
1

De gustibus non est disputandum.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 04:28 AM
1

This is all because of the outdated yet still prevalent misconception that sex is something a man (sic!) does to a woman, which overrides even obvious cases like this, where the woman clearly has power and/or authority over the boy.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 06:06 AM
15

Unless she was paying her own rent, food and other living expenses, she's already been compensated by living for free for 30 fucking years.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 07:04 AM
68

Women hate seeing men happy without them.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 05:44 AM
1

Every time a sentence begins with "I feel like" (and doesn't end with "shit"), I can never figure out if this is just a figure of speech that people overuse because everybody else is overusing it, or the person in question should really just try to feel less and think more.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:23 PM
5

Bitch just put on a fucking cardigan. Or a shawl. Or a jacket. Or any one out of dozens of articles of clothing, that solve the cold problem while still preserving professional attire and even fashion requirements.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 06:00 AM
1

This requires a registration => NOPE.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:22 AM
12

Accusations that never went to court, because the process was discontinued for a complete lack of evidence of any kind (effectively making it into a he-said-she-said case), probably make the vast majority of cases. It's not certain whether these should be counted as false, strictly speaking. Some publications only count those, that were proven to be false with the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard. These are as rare as the former ones are common precisely because the standards of evidence are s…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:19 AM
4

A lot of people are put off by this kind of place because of the overlap with certain other groups. There are people who actively work towards smearing the movement as a wimpy support group for pussies, a harmful hate group ("those damn PUAs/RedPillers/incels" etc.) The overlap is really not even that big, if any. But as long as the perception of it is being constantly reinforced (which it is), in the eyes of your average uninformed person, it might as well be big. a lot also bracket all women i…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:37 PM
1

If a guy can't get what he needs from you, he'll go get it from someone else. Apart from creating a bunch of miserable women, this accomplishes nothing.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 05:28 AM
12

No matter what anyone ever says to you, if you then assault someone, that is on you.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 08:08 AM
1

He just replied to a Monty Python reference with another one. Cheers.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:23 AM
3

Never in the history of any human endevour have different demographic groups been "represented equally" based on their numbers in the given population. Why would someone think that this should or even can be the case is beyond me.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 06:53 AM
5

Our chief weapon is hipocrisy. Hipocrisy and lies... lies and hipocrisy... Our 2 wepons are lies and hipocrisy... and double standards. Our 3 weapons are lies, hipocrisy and double standards... and insults... ... ... our 4 ... Amongst our weapons... uh... Amongst our weaponry are such elements as lies, hipocry- I'll come in again.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 06:47 AM
2

Unfortunately, on the internet extremism and parody of extremism become indistingushable. Yes, It's stupid, but that's why you got downvoted, as people just didn't catch the sarcasm... Edit: Although the all caps is a big hint ;).
/r/MensRights06/05/19 05:38 AM
4

Here, you lost this -> /s
/r/MensRights05/05/19 05:38 PM
1

To believe sometning that is literally the exact opposite of reality (i.e. "We are constantly bombarded with a messaging that normalises violence and sexual violence against women on a scale that we simply don’t see with men.") requires unherad of levels of doublethink. That's what I mean.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:32 PM
3

Creepy uncle Joe grew up in an abusive home where his sister had absolute power. It fucked him up irreversibly. Quite a sad story.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 09:11 AM
4

Literally believing the exact opposite of what's right in front of your eyes. Vegeta, what does the scouter say about their doublethink level?
/r/MensRights26/04/19 08:45 AM
2

It's the epitomy of hypocrisy. They attribute his success to themselves, but his failures to him exclusively.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 07:21 AM
5

You can never defeat something that doesn't extist to begin with. And so you can pretend that your continuous "struggle" is always justified, because the "enemy" has not been defeated yet.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 06:50 AM
1

"women are held at a higher standard" Women are coddled their entire lives. So when, for the first time, they are treated equally to their male peers, the view it as discrimination. This idea, of course, is not consistent with actual reality. Unfortunately "feelz over realz" is a thing and not likey to go away any time soon.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 05:41 AM
2

Doublethink and a complete lack of self-awareness is the modus operandi of feminism. It's pretty much mandatory.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:30 AM
1

Or clothes. Or gas. Or anything else, really.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:26 AM
20

All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
/r/MensRights08/04/19 07:58 AM
1

When satire is basically just a description of reality.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 01:32 PM
10

Keyword child and/or spousal support.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 06:48 AM
3

"Fantasist"? Like being delusional and making false accusations is her fucking job.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:13 AM
4

Doublethink and projection are bread and butter of feminism.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 08:02 AM
1

It's just those that came out so far, still to early. There's really no reliable way to know for sure, unless some kind of massive investigation is conducted. Even if it was like that, it would probably be just a coincidence.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 07:27 AM
2

It's the "muh vagina" "comedian", isn't it. Pass.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 12:13 PM
1

Why is beautiful in quotes?
/r/MensRights19/03/19 02:46 PM
1

*Canadian intensifies*
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:28 AM
1

Senators have time to waste with completely and utterly irrelevant, and stupid, shit like this? WTF is going on?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 06:42 AM
3

So they removed 93% of the reviews? Are you shitting me?
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:01 AM
2

Did they seriously remove 66% of the reviews? And it only increased the score by 16%? Pathetic.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:57 AM
3

It's projection. They feel bad about being the recipients of unearned privilege, but that creates cognitive dissonance with their self-professed image of morality. So they try to shift all the attention away from themselves and push all the blame onto someone else. This requires an incredible amount of doublethink. Also, liars always think everyone else is also lying.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:13 PM
3

IWD will forever be in my heart as Icewind Dale... (English is not my first language)
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:55 AM
2

There's a huge difference between the court finding that the accusations were unequivocally false, and just finding that there was not enough evidence to confirm them. This is why the false accusation statistics are so skewed - the proven false case percentages are in single digits, while the "cannot be proven false but also cannot be proven true" reach upwards of 50% (even up to 80% based on some stats). Most of these cases don't even go to trial and are just thrown out as unsubstantiated. How …
/r/MensRights06/03/19 07:52 AM
1

> apply logic ... aaaand therein lies the problem.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 06:56 AM
1

If it ever happens, it's going to be extremely tricky. Feeleings are on the line. TBH I can't see this going too well, as it essentially boils down to "you hurt me and caused irreversible damage to both my body and psyché, by being ignorant fools".
/r/MensRights27/02/19 02:05 PM
12

How can someone think that amputation of healthy body parts - of an infant child, no less - is good for them, is beyond me.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:08 AM
1

Wow, this thread is all over the place. Check out the sidebar, the faq section already has some of the answers.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:05 AM
2

I get why this was posted here, but the problem is that harmless men are universally hated by both men and women. A man cannot afford not to be "dangerous". Don't listen to anyone suggesting that harmless is desirable.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 07:01 AM
9

Hypocrisy is one of the hallmarks of these types. Don'nt expect them to have any level of self-reflection whatsoever.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 07:24 AM
16

My experience is that women are notoriously bad at telling the height of men. If you're tallen than her, you might as well be 6'4". But once she knows the number, suddenly you're "not even a real man". Fuck that noise.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 07:03 AM
1

It's true that between 70 and 85% of all consumer purchases are controlled by women. Money earned by men gets spent by women.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 06:43 AM
1

If you live alone, you still do the exact same domestic tasks yourself, just in a smaller scale. And nobody thinks you should somehow be getting paid for that. Yes, but then they're not thaught of as housewives, obviously. Like I said, if people live alone, the still do all the chores anyway, but they don't expect to get paid for that.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 06:39 AM
13

This is, of course, completely misleading, intentionally so. This whole concept is just pretending that the woman benefits in no way from cooking, cleaning and doing laundry and dishes - hence the "unpaid" nonsense. They completely ignore that the housewife lives in a house (that isn't hers) for free, eats for free, is clothed for free and basically has all her basic needs taken care of - without having to pay a penny. When she cooks, she dosn't just cook the food for the husband, she cooks it f…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 01:53 PM
1

Somehow this feels like the problem lies within the name itself - Boy Scouts. I can understand girls not being into Girl Scouts, a lame and pointless organization, as it is right now. Where I'm from, the scouts are just Scouts, with male only and female only troops for the kids. When the kids grow up into young adults, they join the Rangers and Rovers, which are basically a joint operation and become the next generation of troop leaders. Why not just change the name to Young Scouts (of America) …
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:00 AM
3

She somehow doesn't see the difference between talking about it on camera and actually doing it on camera. Unfortunately I don't think she will learn her lesson from this. She will probably try to rationalize her behavior so that she can tell a completely twisted version of the venets years later.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 08:48 AM
7

Not just verbally. In non-reciprocal instances of domestic violence (which make about 50% of all cases), women are the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Or at least in 2007 they were. These are arguably old results by now, but based on how things are going so far, I think it's reasonable to believe these numbers have gone up, not down.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:01 PM
2

I don't see why this is being downvoted. It's a legit question/concern.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 07:15 AM
8

The trouble is, when they act like that, your parental instinct kicks in, so you have the tendency to take the shit and take care of them. But you should't be fucking someone with whom you have a parent-child relationship. That's just wrong, even when they are an "adult" by biological age.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 07:10 AM
68

That's what my 4yo niece acts like. And it still pisses me off even when I know she's still a kindergartener and I shoudn't expect too much from her yet.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 07:06 AM
1

Gotta be a troll, come on. ...It better be...
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:34 AM
6

It's like the "pink tax" bullshit. Comparing two obviously completely different things while trying to pretend they are, in fact, identical.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 06:49 AM
31

This shit is probably the very reason why she was hired in the first place.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 10:57 AM
1

Some US based sites have started to simply block EU users instead of having to deal with the hassle. Well, shit.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:44 AM
8

451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons Sorry, this content is not available in your region. Damn you, GDPR.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:41 AM
2

When the reward is just temporary removal of a bad thing instead of an actual good thing, you know you're in hell.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 05:47 AM
2

the loud minority The problem is that the silent majority are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:29 AM
1

Nobody says you should't try to reform capitalism. But don't you go thinking it should be replaced with socialism.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 06:22 AM
6

Any serious form of socialism would be... Cue the "but they are not real socialists" trope. If only you were allowed to take control, you would practice The Real Socialism™. You would usher in a utopia! No, you wouldn't. The murderousness is the very core of socialism, no version of it has ever been anything but totalitarian criminal regime with gulags and famine.This IS the real socialism. It has already been proven over and over again, on every continent (except Australia, maybe, and Antarctic…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:09 AM
16

14-Year-Old Man Wat.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 08:46 AM
1

It never was. Since its conception, feminism was always, and still is, about furthering the interests of women. Peroid.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 07:04 AM
2

Fighting against something nonexistent allows them to clam that it "still hasn't been defeated", thus justifying their continuous and neverending "fight".
/r/MensRights22/03/18 07:02 AM
1

Aaaaand the comments in this thread are already a shitshow.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:14 AM
22

500? That's like half the population of Iceland!
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:37 AM
3

Aaaand she immediately flushed it all down the toilet with the inevitable Patriarchy™ comment. How predictable.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 07:01 AM
3

We need more liberty for people to choose any occupation they want. But if you fail, that's on you.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 10:56 AM
11

This is noting new. Only recently a research report was posted in this sub which states that women consume more tax money than they pay in. In other words - only men pay taxes. Sauce
/r/MensRights26/01/18 09:09 AM
3

That's not because she's a woman, but because she's a moron.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 12:34 PM
1

Ever heard of a prenup? Same principal.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:32 AM
44

Completely useless. These kinds of agreements can and will be thrown out at court. Just claim it was "signed" under duress.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:30 PM
6

Ironically the shitstorm around the memo IS evidence of discrimination by gender. Just not the gender they think.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:22 AM
1

I would wait at least until he hits puberty before making any claims whatsoever about his identity.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 12:45 PM
3

Yep. The number is different in every report, but it's still between 8 and 3 percent. The difference that remains after accounting for all the relevant factors like education, experience and hours worked, is explained by willingness to negotiate. Men get payed more, because they, on average, are more likely to negotiate for more pay. So there may really be a "pay gap", but not because of discrimination.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:42 AM
1

good thing Good one, mate!
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:31 AM
3

This will be tossed out in a second for the same reason prenups are. "Signed under duress." Moreover they will claim an intoxicated person can neither sign a legal document nor give consent. So, unfortunately, utterly useless.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:03 AM
0

This is... probably not worth anyone's attention, TBH. Unless you're into "fashion trends", in which case, still, nobody cares.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 11:01 AM
1

Phew. I was worried at first he was AGAINST "trust but verify". So I was anxious to even watch the video in the first place. Pleasantly surprised.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:55 AM
2

Arrests are made. Except it's nearly always the man, who gets arrested.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:11 AM
1

when alimony expires Haha, good one!
/r/MensRights09/11/17 07:08 AM
26

Wait, how old is this? It took them 12 years to free him when the real culprit was already behind bars?
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:52 AM
3

Women cannot handle the truth™.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 07:17 AM
2

But lo it cannot. It would have to deny its primary and only purpose, on which it was built from the very begining- the advacement of women (at all costs).
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:07 AM
1

Except the article is talking about a 31yo screwing a 15yo. Which is why it was posted to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 11:15 AM
2

How do you know they're a sexual abuse victim? So... you answered your own question there.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 10:51 AM
4

As I understand it, any kind of sexual relationship of a legal adult with a minor in the US falls under the category of statutory rape (maybe different states have different laws on this, though...). So no matter what anyone says about the maturity of either party and/or consent, the law makes it illegal and therefore punishable. The minor party becomes, as per law, a victim of statutory rape.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:45 AM
8

No kind of facepalm is enough to express the stupidity of this.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:36 AM
3

Sexism: this sign. The lack of self-awareness is mind-blowing.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:33 AM
44

The problem is that absurdities from the opposition influence laws and thus become directly detrimental to to focusing on men's issues. Like in family courts for instance.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 05:40 AM
1

It is biased to women. Just not the way they claim.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:26 AM
2

I agree. In no area of human endevour have different demographic groups in a population EVER been represented proportionally. Why would someone think they suddenly will be? Or even can be to begin with? Also real life examples of countries like Sweden, with extremely high levels of egalitarianism in every aspect of society, show us that the more liberty people have to choose what they want to do, the more they gravitate to their natural inclinations. In other words, the more you do to ensure tha…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 07:04 AM
3

If you're irreplacable, you're also unpromotable. There's a risk of getting stuck in your current paygrade.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:30 AM
2

You know you fucked up when genuine oppinions of your movement are indistinguishable from their parodies.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:19 AM
1

What you remember is irrelevant. What the law says is the one and only thing that matters.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:02 AM
1

You can never defeat a nonexistent enemy, and thus your neverending struggle against him is always justified. Be the victim without actually being a victim.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 11:16 AM
2

You don't even have an ID at 14. As such you cannot consent to sex, nor can you legally enter into contracts etc. This is statutory rape, because the law says it is. Now whether the law is set up rightly is a different question alltogether.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:10 AM
1

Just because someone has an oppinion doesn't mean it's worthy of respect. Some opinions are just plain stupid, period. You acknowledged her opinion by responding to it, instead of ignoring it.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 06:31 AM
0

The point is not that all women WILL falsely accuse you and ruin your life, but that all women CAN do it. Are you willing to take that chance?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:20 AM
2

Their assumed oppression does not require a basis in reality.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:51 AM
2

it also demonstrates a severe bias and an unwillingness to solve whatever problem is being presented. Exactly, the don't want to FIX the problems they claim to be fighting against, because then their existence would no longer be required.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:48 AM
1

Their entire existence is based upon the fight of a nonexistent enemy (i. e. the Patriarchy™). A nonexistent enemy can never be defeated, and so the neverending "struggle" is validated.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:40 AM
1

Didn't he also say that in no area of human endevour have diferent demographics ever been represented evenly acording to population size - so why would anyone expect it to suddenly be so? On the example of countries like Norway or Sweden we have seen that the more liberty individuals have to pursue any kind of activity they want, the more they tend to pursue their natural inclinations. In other words - if you remove barriers to free choice, different demographics (like men and women) tend to bec…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 12:13 PM
3

Exactly - ignore this activity (and all others like it) and go back to 1.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:54 AM
2

"Disable adblock to view content." "Enable location tracking?" Not even once.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:15 AM
5

Except they don't care about reality. They ignore actual evidence and continue to make the same bogus claims like nothing happened.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 11:29 AM
1

Who needs a mentor, when you have a mentat.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 09:52 AM
1

And note that there is no "essentially never" on the bottom scale, either.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 10:15 AM
1

For anyone from the CZ/SK region - it can be rented on google.play for less than €2 (currently 39 Kč). Buy it for approx. €6 (160 Kč).
/r/MensRights09/03/17 10:46 AM
5

Canada is FUBAR. Just burn everything to the ground and start again from scratch. The point of no return has been crossed.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:56 AM
8

It's the "women are wonderful" effect. They don't have more problems, they just whine more about what they percive as problems, even though those are objectively mostly non-issues. And men tend to believe them. If you take a look at real issues, like (mental) health, homelessness, criminal activity victimization etc., in virtually every single category men have it demonstrably worse. Not even talking about criminal justice system and family court discrimination, where you can notice all the same…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 10:29 AM
3

It's a copy-pasta. But with good sources.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:45 AM
21

None of his opponents seem to actually address any of his arguments, they just fling dirt. Or they say "your data is wrong", without explaining exactly what part is wrong and why.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:04 PM
22

equality law is not gender neutral WUT?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 12:26 PM
2

Check the sidebar. There are already some pretty comprehensive lists of resources.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:43 AM
10

So it wasn't really a settlement. Because, according to the courts, nothing has been settled, and never will.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:35 AM
2

Poe's law. This has to be satire.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 08:33 AM
1

"Comments are closed on this article". Is this common on this site?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 01:16 PM
1

Does he really hate himself and what he is - a white man - so much? I can't tell. How else can he be saying that shit so casually? I don't know. But I do believe that all his shows are designed for Americans - because he knows that what he says will strike a chord. This post is a proof of that.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 01:05 PM
2

It's his shtick. Along with "white people are the worst and all they ever did is horrible." He does this, because it works on Americans.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 10:19 AM
1

And again, they are LITERALLY the cause of the very thing, they claim to fight against.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 08:37 PM
-2

"I'm special." Sure you are, sweetie. Backs away slowly
/r/MensRights02/11/16 10:24 AM
1

They hijacked the yin-yang symbol and completely misrepresented its meaning. They've been doing this to symbols and words and their meanings forever.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 07:21 AM
2

It's not misogyny, though, It's just being an asshole.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 07:02 AM
2

They're not fighting gender inequality. They're creating it. They're literally the cause of the very thing they claim to fight.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 07:11 PM
3

a narrative without evidence or with counter evidence in 95+% of cases will fail It should fail. Yet we're wintnessing an increasing effort to do away with the pesky burden of proof. Were there not enough cases already, where the court did not care about evidence (or lack thereof), because feelz > realz?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:29 AM
97

True. And this is how courts should work in a democratic country. Protecting the innocent from unfair punishment, even at the cost of sometimes acquiting a few guilty ones.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 05:58 PM
2

I'd give my seat to an elderly person, someone disabled or visibly physically impaired, and a pregnant woman. That's about it. Though if someone asked me nicely, I'd probably give them the seat as well. But don't expect me to do shit for you, if you don't even have the manners of saying please.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 07:35 AM
1

Wow, thanks. Maybe it's because I'm not from the US *or the UK.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 10:38 AM
1

Paywalled.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 09:57 AM
3

You're overthinking this. I don't see a reason to be outraged, or even to notice these macros/memes/facebook reposts to begin with.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 09:52 AM
1

This gets reposted probably every other week. Still if anyone didn't see it yet, or read the book, it's worth it.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:00 AM
95

You know it's bad when you expect these frauds to get away with it and then when they are handed an - arguably low - sentence, you're impressed... In my opinion the intent to harm (via proxy - the justice system and the police) is what should be considered to be socially dangerous, more so than insurance fraud, and thus lead to more harsh sentencing.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:39 PM
1633

Jailed? As in she'll do hard time? Well that's a first time. And I say GOOD.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:31 AM
3

No, just let everyone sing up to whatever the fuck they want.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 10:54 AM
0

To paraphrase you: he was black so there must've been a good reason to shoot him. You mean to COMPLETELY MISREPRESENT WHAT I ACTUALLY SAID. There was a good reason to shoot him, as he assaulted the police and resisted arrest. He just happened to be black, which is completely unrelated to the individual case. Pull your head out of your ass and stop making excuses for criminals. Moron. I f you want to treat every crime as an individual case and not paint with broad brushes, you must do the same fo…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 06:06 AM
1

I'm not familiar with this case. However claiming that the police are racist in general based on anecdotal evidence, which has probably been completely misrepresented, just like the case of Michael Brown etc., is just plain stupid.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:16 AM
2

Blacks may have real grievances, but BLM and the like certainly don't contribute to solving any of them. To the contrary, they'll have you chasing non-existant problems, like racist cops killing unarmed innocent blacks, while this is categorically not the case, as demonstrated amply by criminal justice statistics.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:32 AM
1

White men lack the ability to gain anything from engaging in Victim Olympics, because Victim Olympics don't care about actual victimhood. Only members of arbitrarily determined "marginalized" groups can be viewed as victims, regardless of reality. A white man can whine all he wants, but nobodz cares or even notices.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:22 AM
0

It wasn't the undefined mystical illuminati group of "neckbeards", who build the entire narrative of "this movie sucks because there are women in it". It was the director, the cast and the distributors. And of course they did it in an attempt to cover the fact that the movie simply sucks.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:17 AM
2

If a white dude tried to do this, nobody would care or even notice. People only talk about this because she keeps playing the black and woman cards. Which is something we have seen a hundred times before.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:08 AM
25

WTF is she doing on Tinder then? FFS
/r/MensRights16/04/16 10:39 AM
1

"Well I'm not exactly lying, but I am being decietful about it..." WAT.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 12:21 PM
1

The article is full of strong rhetorics, so I'm not surprised that pieces like this one got the author on a blacklist. I still agree with just about everything he wrote. Guy is pissed for legitimate reasons.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:05 PM
1

Empathetic? They mean SYMpathetic.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 02:45 PM
1

Well I knew you can't say cunt in Canada (relevant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwBR0qwHZBA), but apparently, neither can you in the US.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 02:20 PM
3

The thing about the "unexplained gap" is that it is, well, unexplained. How did he come to the conclusion that it unambiguously equals discrimination? Just like unreported crimes are exactly that - unreported. So how do you make them into a statistic?
/r/MensRights03/02/16 01:25 PM
1

So only about 10% of all the universities have a green ranking? WTF?
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:29 PM
2

Feminism doesn't have a drak side. Feminism IS the dark side.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:19 AM
2

Wait, someone actually makes this comparison?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:03 PM
3

There has been a pee-on-a-piece-of-paper-at-home prostate cancer test for a long time now. http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/14/7/13893/htm But the drug companies just don't see it as profitable enough for mass production. So they won't do it.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 10:39 AM
4

Whoa, I didn't realize Thunderfoot works for the Czech Academy of Science at the moment. That's kinda awesome :).
/r/MensRights19/10/15 08:43 AM
4

Exactly, they just keep repeating the same washed out shit over and over again. The smug self-righteouseness is seeping through the cracks there.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 08:21 AM
1

fashionable ≠ looks good
/r/MensRights19/08/15 06:18 AM
9

I'm gonna choose practical and comfortable over fashionable any day.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 12:58 PM
5

... any prenup document would have to be honored. A significant point...
/r/MensRights14/08/15 01:10 PM
4

That very idea is, of course, fundamentallly sexist itself. But more importantly - stupid.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:50 PM
3

Who the fuck is this and why should we care? That's right, we shouldn't.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:53 AM
4

Inform your partner that you're a feminist, so that he can dump your ass immediately for his own good.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:19 PM
2

Now - let me ask a completely legit question: what were they thinking?!
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:53 PM
2

The entire piece is smear campaign with literally ZERO evidence behind it, credible or otherwise. According to thier own rules, they should have deleted it already.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:31 AM
15

She takes it as an attack on herself. Still one of the more civil presentations out there, especially when compared to pulling fire alarms etc.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:29 PM
2

The whole "because it is offensive" is what doesn't play right with me. I'm not saying I agree with the original message (it's a lame joke), but being offended does not give anyone any special rights and it souhldn't be possible to use it as a weapon.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:16 AM
7

When someone asked for it to be taken down because it is offensive That is no reason for something being taken down though...
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:40 PM
59

They probably refused because they knew something was off. Women don't come up to you in the street and ask for sex. That simply doesn't happen. Empirical experience tells us to become instantly suspicious. And even those 30% that agreed probably knew it was fake. They were just curious as to what was actually behind it.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:03 AM
2

What percentage of the 70% honestly didn't believe the offer was genuine? I'm guessing it's nearly all of them. And how many of the 30% that agreed, didn't believe it was a genuine offer? Again, probably nearly all of them.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:08 PM
7

I reminded her that we've invited the female coworkers out numerous times but none of them want to hang out with a bunch of nerdy men who talk-tech. Typical. They bitch about "lack of women", but when they are actually invited, they just ignore it.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:45 AM
5

Hypocrites gonna doublethink. Such is their nature. Dosen't mean we should not call them out on their bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 07:58 AM
1

Vegetables cannot even compare. Not even close. Read this: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/71/3/665.full. They conclude that most such societies likely derived more than half of their subsistence energy from animal foods and that because wild plant foods have a relatively low carbohydrate content, protein intake was elevated at the expense of carbohydrate (4).
/r/MensRights25/03/15 07:24 AM
1

Gatherers provided the bigger amount of food, but the bigger nutritional value was provided by the hunters. That's why it was even worth it to take the risk in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 07:35 PM
78

The prosecution should be prosecuted. The concept of shame is unknown to them.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:31 AM
3

Trouble is that laws right now are pretty ambiguous. Was there a real threat that would justify the use of force? Was the force adequate? You will always have people who believe that a women is never a threat no matter what, and to use any kind of force against a woman is not adequate in any situation.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:42 AM
6

It's just hypocrites projecting their own entilement onto other people in order not to feel bad about themselves. Don't try to apply reason to these people. They do not want a discussion.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 12:01 PM
3

The tall man would be standing in a hole to make him shorter than the fence, while the woman burns all three of the crates while complaining about lack of crates and urging the men to do something about it.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:32 PM
1

So... are they pointing out their own hypocrisy? What in the world is going on here?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:26 PM
2

It's interesting to watch the dilemma between anti-discrimination regulations and free market principles. Unfortunately, these are often mutually exclusive. Who can decide, which one of these principles is more important? Where do we draw the line? In the US, it seems, people are experts on forcing originally level-headed issues into absurdity.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:39 PM
1

Don't ask how is this fair. Ask how is it possible that someone believes it to be fair.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:41 PM
4

Most feminists are traditionalists Most feminists are contradictionists.* FTFY
/r/MensRights02/11/14 09:31 AM
1

Those dogs would have probably behaved the same even if the puppy was male.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:42 PM
4

Is it just me or are the circle sizes completely random? You can probably fit 10 of the purlple 54.1M circles in the 257.85M pink one.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:19 AM
5

She just slapped a bunch of random words together and now she's pretending like she's made a compelling argument. There is no talking to these people. Edit: So apparently she is actually a he...
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:08 AM
1

I don't know about simplistic ideas, but I sure don't remember being thaught anything about the foreskin other than that it is attached to the glans at first and becomes detached anytime between 5 and 14 years of age.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:27 PM
1

It's the idea that female circumcision is incomparably worse than male, that pisses me off. And people believe that, because that's what they have been told by the media - the horrors of FGM in Africa etc. It's a blatant generalisation and it should be downright illegal to perform amputations on anyone, when not medically necessary. I see circumcision as something negative to be avoided (at least with babies/kids), not as something neutral, like most people here.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:19 PM
5

They are just looking for a pat on tha back from likeminded people. Not looking for a discussion, not looking for confrontation, not looking to change their view. Just a confirmation of what they already believe. Does this make you the only one in the group who disagrees? Tough shit. Unless you are willing to compromise your ouwn honesty and intellectual integrity for the sake of acceptance. There is probably no talking to these people. Just dodge those topics, if you can. If a discussion at wor…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 01:05 PM
2

Women not wanting to be astronauts as much as men do is a sign of inequality? You said that, not me.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:40 PM
3

So that the society doesn't get stuck 100 years behind everyone else. If they claim to aim for equality of sexes (which they do, just like most other countries), something needs to change.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:43 AM
12

The posiion of women in South Korea is way different from the West. Even among relatively young women (~30) the cultural norm is still to stay at home and shut up. Women are safe and taken care of at the cost of personal liberty. Technically they have all the rights, but to actually use them is still socially unacceptable. At the same time it forces the men into traditional roles as well. So this astronaut probably is an ovepriced PR project, but they desperately need more of professionally acti…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:51 PM
1

It's probably the makeup style.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 11:18 AM
15

If a company's board of directors consists of 100% women, that's perfectly fine. And this is why gendered quotas are bullshit. I don't see any quotas anywhere other than boards of directors. How about a quota for the shit jobs as well? If a 90% male board of directors is not fine, a 90% female one is not fine either. It's also demeaning to women who are trying to become serious candidates for these positions. It's like the government is saying "you're all incompetent and unless we make it mandat…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:31 PM
0

I always try to look at these as fucked up actions of fucked up individuals (a.k.a. assholes). But then I have to wonder: would these assholes try it, unless they knew, they could get away with it? Assholes will do fucked up things. But when the state justifies this bullshit and FUCKS UP the lives of innocent people in order to protect said assholes, that's when I don't want to live on thes planet any more.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:13 PM
6

At the same time, traditional roles also constitute "shut the fuck up and make me a sadwich while you are being provided for". But of course, they don't want to see any of that.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:53 AM
3

it occurs to men almost just as much It actually occurs to men THE SAME, OR MORE often. It is just not believed/taken seriously.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:45 PM
3

It is not. Different people have different expectations. People have different personalities and experience the world and their own emotions in different ways. MEN AND WOMEN ARE NOT THE SAME. Anyone who wolud believe what the title says is a moron. If my libido is extremely higher than that of my so, it is probably time to find someone else for the both of us. As hard as it might be.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:59 PM
1

I've been going there and back using public transit since I was 6 years old. There is no subway in my town though (just trolley/busses and trams).
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:55 PM
1

The mom has the right idea there. But the fact that her son had to wait to be 9 to go anywhere alone just blows my mind.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:38 PM
13

I had to re-read the thing to realize it was not, in fact, a 4yo kid. In which case the reaction would have been somewhat justified.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 03:29 PM
0

Is this really worth the waste of energy (and mood) by being outraged?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:37 PM
-2

Why does anyone troll about anything? To provoke a reaction. The behavior of some of the people in the story is extremely rage-inducing and honestly hard to believe. Unbelievable assholery does happen, though. Look, didn't mean to be rude, but we have seen unconfirmed posts about similar stupendously unfair cases that turned out to be troll-bait. The mods of this sub had to post warnings not to fall for that.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:45 PM
-1

It's the language, the composition, the structure of the text... Hard to explain. Seems to me like a troll post.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:29 PM
5

It doesn't matter that the nutcase is a woman and the pro-lifers are men. No one should think they can get away with such behavior. An asshole like this deserves to get hauled straight to jail, no fucking phonecall, no fucking bail. Edit: grammar.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:23 PM
-1

Sounds like a fake story to me, sorry. I might be wrong...
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:11 PM
1

provided more food and resources for their clan than men had Nope. Women have spent MORE TIME gathering roots and berries, but men have brought in more nutritional value. One good hunt was worth a hundred days of gathering. Not to say that women don't work, but the lobby to liberate women while doing everything to prevent men from being liberated is simply undeniable.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:24 AM
6

Women can be drafted, fight and die in combat Women in a family can be expected to work just as hard as men in the workplace But WILL they actually?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:19 PM
6

I have no idea how he can remain so calm while watching those videos. I was already looking to smash things after mere seconds of that demagoguery. And her condescending face while matter-of-factly spouting downright fabrications is just pissing me off so much! This is not healthy on a Friday afternoon.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 01:48 PM
2

I had to read that twice to notice that the second time the flat was all cleaned up :). My dad would do something like this as well.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 07:19 PM
5

This is doublethink - straight out of 1984. Have two contradictory ideas in your mind and accept both of them at the same time.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:27 AM
2

I think bossy is someone, who is trying to order people around even though he/she has no mandate to do so. In other words - not natural leaders (because people don't want to be told what to do by them), but still acting as they know better. In some instances the may actually know better, but not nearly as often as they like to claim.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 12:28 PM
2

Likewise, a man paying for dinner doesn’t mean I’m obliged to be extra friendly; it’s just a courtesy that should be common practice. How about: "Likewise, a woman making me a sandwich doesn't mean I'm obligated to be extra friendly; it's just a courtesy that should be common practice." How does that sound? You reap what you saw.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:51 PM
2

any child you father You have to pay even if it turns out you did NOT actually father any children.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:23 AM
2

The problem is, that even though women are, in fact, attacked significantly less often, the are still afraid significantly more often - because they are being taught to be. Their feelings are not based upon reality, but rather on a self-reinforcing cycle of propaganda. Men are nowhere near as fearful about personal safety, even though experience tells them they should be.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:00 AM
1

a nicer prison and call it a care home insane asylum* FTFY
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:44 PM
2

Actually, it illustrates that "they" DO have a common agenda. Which is to prevent a peacefull conference from happening. Or anything organised by men for men.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 08:21 AM
8

Exactly. Intelligent doesn't mean rational at all times.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:12 PM
74

Every passenger should respect every other passenger. Don't they have something like that in the terms and conditions even? I don't get this either.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 11:38 AM
6

Enjoy what suits you, but blame all the inconvenient consequences one someone else. Is it just a coincidence, that the groups of spineless bastards and feminists shade into each other?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:24 PM
9

Not a single word about actually being the father. Just being the husband of the mother is enough. In other words - you are the father, even though you are not the father.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:17 PM
2

That would be like selling your car and then calling the cops on the buyer for car theft, because you changed your mind later.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:40 PM
10

I just cannot understand this whole "I's something completely different" thing. I simply cannot see any room for interpretation here. A part of a person's genitals is being cut off without their consent and without a medically valid reason = genital mutilation. WTF is this woman even talking about?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:16 PM
1

“Teach men the difference between the level of pleasure they’re used to, and the level of pleasure that is possible.” Dafuq kinda logic is that? If I am used to something, it's already a proof, that it IS possible.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:24 AM
8

Anytime the boy got an erection after that EVERY FUCKING NIGHT! A healthy man gets erections during every sleep cycle.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:56 AM
4

Morons gonna... more, I guess. When women are being taught from early childhood that there is danger everywhere in the form of men, of course they will grow up believing it and seeing evil dangerous men behind every corner. Even though in civilised countries women in general are the safest in the history of mankind.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:28 PM
1

That's some 12th century superstition right there. When uncut men ejaculate, they hold the semen in their foreskin (like a sort of bag) and take it somewhere to dispose of it ಠ_ಠ that one is a joke, I hope.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:22 PM
1

The thing is that that is exactly what it seems like from her point of view. She is dumping you - father or no, and she knows she will be getting your money no matter what. She doesn't even need to give it another thought.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 03:25 PM
-1

The classic "most people in power are men => most men are in power" fallacy seems to be ever so prevalent.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:03 PM
8

Isn't it nice to be treated like a human being for a change? I have never encountered any of this personally, but just reading about shit like that makes me grind my teeth and break pencils. For this to be considered "interesting reaction", things must already be pretty bad.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:00 PM
2

Maybe he was suggesting that getting a dog can help you through times of depression (just being optimistic there for a change)?
/r/MensRights29/04/14 09:25 AM
0

What's with all the "why is it okay to insert an ovewhelmingly NOT okay statement"?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:16 PM
2

It's not wrong to suggest men have had more impact on mankind's success. Even if the idea itself was wrong (which I don't say it is).
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:47 PM
22

No news there. It's women who initiate the divorce in most cases. Getting dumped always sucks. Especially after years of marrige.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter