TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RolandDeepson Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by RolandDeepson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Women are mainly valued because they have the ability to give children. Dude, what in the sideways APPROXIMATE fuck could you possibly THINK you mean by this? Take a damned seat.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 09:25 AM
1

Nope. Neither curious at all, nor is it in any way mere agnostic "honesty." You cleanly missed both halves of the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 11:43 PM
2

Dude. "Not all men" completely inverts the point. Yes most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 11:41 PM
1

very few felons are serial killers And every serial killer starts their criminal careers as a non-felon.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 11:39 PM
15

Such self-tattling. "A man can tolerate a piece-of-shit-personality woman with an objectively-attractive-body because men, at least initially, can disregard a woman's personality."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 08:48 AM
45

You've never encountered an objectively-attractive woman who was a total turnoff because something about her personality revealed that she was just a piece of shit human being? Does this really confuse you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:38 AM
1

Matt Rife is rp tho?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 06:51 PM
1

1) You're reducing your analysis of outcomes to a binary essentalistic criterion of orgasm$yes and orgasm$no. 2) You ignore any meta-analysis of external-to-activity societal influences. I see no mention, not even dismissal, of puritanical sex miseducation. A) This could expand the explanation of why there seems to be a cultural emphasis on PIV (puritanical emphasis on procreation as the end goal to the intentional exclusion of pleasure -- for either participant). B) Puritanicalism might influen…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 11:48 AM
6

It implies being a second choice. It commoditizes a person in an unflattering way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 01:50 PM
1

K.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 01:38 AM
1

I'd ban that stupid nonsense shit too. Because it's a stupid bullshit hyperbolic take. Anyone who would say it while genuinely believing it's true is a fucking moron who deserves to be made fun of. You had me up until that, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 01:29 AM
1

Sweet summer child, I mod a pretty active subreddit myself. I'm exceedingly willing to presume that whatever got a person banned either wasn't an isolated incident at all, or at least wasn't an innocent "hey MGM is a thing still" statement. I'm quite willing to be proven wrong, of course, but not by you and not about this. I CONTINUE to spend a lot of money repaying my student loans on my law degree, I won't litigate this case for you here on reddit for free. I said my piece, I was constructive …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 12:20 AM
–

Acceptability of MGM. Lassaiz-faire acquiescense to today's status quo. Policy prioritization implicitly based expressly upon whether an issue affects specifically boys or specifically girls. That's just off the cuff, most def some other assumptions to unpack as well. Again, I do NOT intend to mock or belittle. I'm simply saying that your admittedly-commendable level of passion for the topics you describe would be levels-of-magnitude more effective in persuasion and bringing about positive chang…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 07:03 PM
–

Dude, you need to invest a LOT of energy and time educating yourself on what feminism is. I've been learning for around two decades now, and I still don't have all the answers. Your samples are un-representative, your examples are misshapen for the points you seem to wanna make, your conclusions are poorly constructed, and your only coherent thread in your entire stance is that you're appealing to emotion, citing against doctrines of fairness without identifying what fairness is or would even be…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 11:54 AM
–

Fellow dood here. You're making a lot of assumptions in this OP and in these comments. Almost all of them are wrong. You're demonizing FeMiNiStS when they're not actually the ones with the positions you seem to be railing against. "All or nothing" politics is stupid, and if you had a law degree you'd also understand that it's just sloppy legislation. Smaller, bite-size chunks of law are preferable because if some law gets ruled unconstitutional (for example, a drafting error that messes up "shal…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 10:22 AM
1

jfc
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 02:46 AM
3

The 30% aren't... Then who the fuck is dating who?!?!? 30% of men are doing what? 70% of women are, supposedly, according to.you, doing what???
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:23 PM
2

So wait, how do you explain the gender discrepancy? Do men outnumber women ~2.5:1? Do women knowingly / unknowingly engage with men who themselves maintain multiple parallel relationships (thus fewer men "tying down" a greater quantity of women)? Are you saying that there are fewer heterosexual women than there are heterosexual men (i.e. more women in relationships because they're dating each other instead of men)?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 12:30 AM
1

Listen, if you were distinguishing consent to SEX from consent to CHILDREN then you'd be full of shit. There is no such thing as a man, consenting to sex, without also consenting to potentially child support. Just like, if a woman consents to carrying a pregnancy to term, she's consenting to EITHER be on the hook for her own child support burden, OR she's consenting to actively participating in the raising of that child (such as by somehow participating in the adoption process.) And yes, the wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 04:41 PM
1

I agree with your assertion that such double standards are odious. However, I fail to observe any commentary to suggest that a woman is definitionally incapable of rape. In the precedent case you cited, I wouldn't describe a rightful outcome for the male rape victim as "a paper abortion." A paper abortion is something entirely outside the scope of male-victim rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 03:06 PM
1

How is that case relevant to this discussion?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:58 PM
3

Flippantly whatabout-ed in reference to "a bitch gets pregnant" with some rambling autocorrect horseshit. Honestly, thinking back, they might've been redditing while drunk. Like, I'm not joking.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 05:00 AM
3

Is OP under some jeager-bomb-fueled understanding that moving out of state will prevent child support collections?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:54 AM
10

My dude if BITING DURING A BLOWJOB isn't either a dealbreaker or an explicitly-discussed kink for you, condom or no condom, then reddit is not a pathway to solutions for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:50 AM
5

What in the approximate fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:47 AM
1

Proved what point? I'm a hetero dude and I have no map to the nearest clue what you're talking about in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:00 PM
1

And MacKenzie Bezos was recently referred to as an "author" who was worth ~$27B. Leaving open the potential misread that she's a multi-billionaire as a result of proceeds from sales of books that she has "authored." That's not even touching the fact that, for some of what she's authored, she published it at a time where her husband literally owned the actual-literal Amazon ALGORITHM so, yeah, calling her "bestseller author" also mis-hypes.
/r/seduction08/02/24 06:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter