TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Roosky Archive

View 3 posts and 90 comments by Roosky on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Because the court of law always punishes women to the full extent of the law?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 06:33 PM
11

Is it really tho?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 06:30 PM
14

Yeah he should really be thankful for feeling violated. Seriously, we have vaccines and antibiotics and condoms and soap now.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:45 PM
22

Basic hygiene and safe sex practices and your entire argument is useless. Seriously, let's completely deny all boys bodily integrity because some people can't be bothered to wash their dick and put on a condom.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:15 PM
27

Regardless of the label, I'd like to make the decision myself and not have someone do it for me. It's called a right to bodily integrity and currently men don't have it.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:38 PM
1

I'm a bit late to the party but I thought some words of encouragement and advice would help. First of all, I'd care less about this discussion. It's clear that you're not going to change their minds if they aren't interested in even having a discussion. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches if you just let them have their echochamber circlejerk. Let them continue being ironically racist and sexist. It's painful and humiliating, but honestly, who cares about the opinions of bigots when the rest…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:54 AM
10

I posted it as a tongue in cheek response to donglegate.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:49 AM
11

The "/s" in the title indicates sarcasm.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:48 AM
18

The "/s" in the title indicates sarcasm. Your hopes are well-placed.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:53 AM
17

I also enjoy the incredible levels of strawman this poster creates just to conform to their pre-existing narrative.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 11:53 PM
33

I'd just like to point out that this is, at best, strawman. I'm also fairly sure it's fake.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:27 PM
3

Maybe less of the visible damage... In any case, abuse is about 50:50.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:08 PM
2

I would have gone to kinkos, printed out a huge picture of jesus and brought it to school. Coming face to face with the raw hypocrisy of oneself can change at least some minds.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 01:52 AM
27

I like how mutilating a perfectly natural part of your body will make you look not weird.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 03:01 PM
31

This can't be right... This is what happens when misinformed fools are told condoms are bad and circumcision is good.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 03:00 PM
5

Is this what passes for trolling these days?
/r/MensRights22/06/12 07:46 PM
4

This article accurately describes why I dislike the dismissal of male issues by with, "what about the mens." No one talks about them, it's severely under reported, and men suffer.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 05:14 PM
8

Isn't that like every dating sim out there?
/r/MensRights01/06/12 08:31 PM
1

This is an excellent read. I feel like this should be reposted elsewhere to encourage discussion as it is succinct and hard to argue with.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:56 AM
5

So if my religion tells me I need to sacrifice my first born child to get a decent harvest this year or die, I shouldn't be held liable because I'm practicing my religion? Please tell me at what point does my religion stop being a religion and starts being child abuse.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:48 PM
3

Here's the problem. The infant isn't practicing the religion, the parents are. If a child grows up and want to get circumcised, no problem, that's their choice, but someone shouldn't be making their choice for them.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:31 PM
8

By limiting access to it you are playing the same game that right wing Christians are playing with abortion. You just stepped in some shit. That's the exact opposite of this argument. Abortion is about a choice a woman makes because it's her body, whereas circumcision is about someone making a decision for a child who hasn't made a choice about anything. You're arguing that people should be allowed to make decision about other people's bodies. You're the right-winger in this situation.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:37 PM
8

I think that every parent should be allowed to make what they believe is the best decision for their child. So a narrative like this wouldn't bother you? I believe my child should starve 5 days out of the week and doesn't need their toes so i'll be taking one off every year for their birthday. I believe this is the best decision for them. Yes, I took that to the extreme but you're condoning performing an excruciating medical procedure on an infant that doesn't need it. there is a VERY big differ…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:59 PM
22

Fuck you. NOTE TO EVERYONE! DON'T CLICK THAT LINK, IT'S JUST SCREAMING CLOWN FLASHING SHIT..
/r/MensRights07/05/12 02:36 AM
3

Anyone have a link to the blogger? Maybe some civil conversation with them can make them understand that false rape accusations are terrible for actual rape victims and innocent people who are accused. There should not be anyone on the other side of this argument.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 02:26 AM
1

Agreed that a maximum has to be determined but I think in the US my idea would work as well. We have the technology to do it and medical cards already do this. If you have know what a benefits card is, you know what I mean. Just put parameters on what can and can't be purchased and let the computer do the rest. I believe that sometimes something outside the parameters may be needed so perhaps a monthly "anytime" dollars amount can be set as well to be used on essentially anything.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:09 AM
2

no one in power cares enough Exactly. The framework is already there in the form of food stamps so adding another branch to a government agency that essentially does this already wouldn't be that difficult.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 03:33 AM
10

Why not do it like food stamps? The kid gets an account that child support is being paid into and the primary caregiver has access via credit card. The card can be used for things the child needs like food, clothes, books, etc. but not for other things like $400 shoes, jewelry etc. If anything goes on the card that's more than $100, it gets flagged and inquired into to prevent fraud. Any money left over is the kid's to keep after they turn 21. Edit: Accidentally the age.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 03:06 AM
8

I still don't understand why child support is paid to the mother. Anyone care to explain? I don't mean sarcastically, ie because mama needs new shoes, I mean how is this explained in the court?
/r/MensRights04/05/12 02:09 AM
20

There was an article about this very thing recently where the women was arrested, don't be dense.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:08 AM
3

Lucky guy. Things could have been a lot worse...
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:01 PM
1

Nah, he should really be glad to have been accused and learned a lesson about his privilege.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:59 AM
4

Wow,ok then... Record everything. Have proof of everything. Constantly have alibis.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:49 AM
3

I highly approve of a sex without consent is rape campaign. Upvoted for a clear and concise message that would be a great slogan.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:18 PM
1

That's why I said that this campaign is problematic.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:10 PM
2

Rediquette apparently.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:50 PM
19

I'm gonna try to explain the thinking behind some of these kinds of posters so please don't downvote because you disagree, downvote if I'm not adding to the conversation. I personally think these posters are wrong but a different perspective can be helpful. The men can stop rape campaign isn't against a campaign against the violent rapist that will stalk in the shadows and drag women into an alley. My understanding is that it's against more date rape kinds of rape. If a woman and a man have had …
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:28 PM
18

I just wanted to point out that I've paid traffic fines of nearly that amount.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:04 PM
3

Seeing as how the majority of the homeless are men anyway, don't you think that's the real issue?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:40 PM
2

Comics and memes aren't too bad. Might help people relate to MRAs better. Hearts and minds....
/r/MensRights17/02/12 09:16 AM
2

We've had this thread before and I'd say that the majority of us had no qualms about women going topless. The religious right obviously would though and One Million Moms' heads would explode at the thought of women being topless in public.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:19 PM
2

I'm sorry you need to be told to not be hostile.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:05 PM
2

I'm asking you to be more tolerant and less aggressive. Sorry if those are ideas that you can't get behind.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:41 PM
2

Did his content? Or anything else? Maybe he's a photographer?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:17 PM
2

But there was no indication that it was going in that direction. Also, do it in a PM. And also, most importantly, stop being hostile towards someone who didn't do anything to warrant it.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:14 PM
2

Once again, do it in a PM and don't be so hostile about it.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:47 PM
2

Then do it in a PM, there's no need to air your inquisition on every MRA who happens to be a gun owner.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:32 PM
2

Honestly, being an aggressive asshole is used way more often against MRAs than being a gun owner. Stop being pedantic.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:22 PM
2

Honestly, get over it.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:07 PM
2

But you automatically link shooting with violence which is a fallacy. It's also a handle, something most people will ignore unless it's blatantly obscene.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:58 PM
2

Probably because I'm not paranoid about every little detail.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:48 PM
2

It's not tied to the men's movement. It's a handle on a website. Donkey_Schlong isn't exactly the most endearing handle to connect to the movement but you're not giving him the same treatment.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:37 PM
2

In America, it's perfectly legal and vilifying responsible gun owners is ridiculous. So while you're technically correct, it's completely irrelevant in America where most redditors are based.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:15 PM
2

civilians that carry and use guns are generally criminals. That is a huge conclusion jump. How do you figure this? Blatant generalization that I doubt has any real facts to back that. I'll stay open minded but you have provided no data. Please do, otherwise you're being hugely biased against responsible gun owners.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:01 PM
1

Its not a wild accusation,in most western countries non civilians don't carry guns. That means nothing. Yes, they are a minority. Does being a minority automatically make someone bad or dangerous? You're being ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:44 PM
1

generally the only civilian people that have guns are criminals That is a wild accusation and more than subtly hints that there is a direct correlation between gun ownership and crimes. If you make those kinds of claims, you should be able to prove it.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:35 PM
1

That is a wild accusation that is not even close to being accurate. Also, way to derail the thread and get hung up on insignificant details.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:03 PM
1

Known troll and tagged.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:47 AM
1

Actually gay marriage would see the least amount of gender bias in the courts as both parties are the same sex.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:01 AM
4

I love how /mr was getting badmouthed throughout the thread. Here's a story of a men being fucked over by the courts for being a man but /mr is obviously full of misogynists because this sort of thing that we just read about never happens. The disconnect is astounding.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:58 PM
11

I think she was being sarcastic, or at least that's how I read it.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 02:01 AM
1

A lot of people might justify this away but many see this as a real injustice that they hadn't realized was even an issue. The point is to keep raising awareness.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:12 AM
21

I hate to be that guy but I don't see what this has to do with /mr.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:38 AM
5

I've said before that we should be outsourcing videos like these to other places where it would be relevant like r/videos. Raising awareness is, of course, only part of the struggle but many people don't even know that these kinds of things exist.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 12:54 AM
2

So is there any 100% way to not getting accused of rape? Or hell, even 51%? As far as I know, even celibacy isn't foolproof.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 06:23 PM
7

My girlfriend insists on paying for every other date and has on occasion snuck money into my wallet if I paid for something out of turn.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 06:51 PM
2

Ok, fair enough, but you're doing a disservice to the movement by not actually addressing the issue and just waving it off. To make it clearer, it would be like being asked to "check your privilege" by a feminist when confronted with an argument.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 06:48 PM
2

I've upvoted you in the past but don't be dismissive. If you have a argument to present to econguy, please present it. Just waving it off as concern troll is pretty much ad hominem.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 06:37 PM
10

While I agree with the ACLU on many things, this is not one of them. I won't denounce the entire organization but I'll be sure to make them rethink their position on this topic.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 08:36 AM
18

Doors, another thing to get offended about whether you do it or you don't. There are some women who are offended by it because they think it implies the inferior status of women–that women are too weak to open doors for themselves.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 03:46 AM
9

Not every post has to be "meaningful." Sometimes posts can just be posted to show the prevalence of a certain issue.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:32 AM
9

Is it really that hard to extrapolate?
/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:58 AM
3

I was under the assumption that it would be understood that the father is losing the children regardless.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 10:38 PM
6

Where did you get the idea to kidnap the kids? No, I meant that if you are going to lose your kids, you might as well skip town and gtfo of the country. Children shouldn't be used as ransom by an ex.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 10:26 PM
7

If the wife threatens you with divorce, why not threaten her with you getting the fuck to nicaragua or something? If you're getting screwed out of custody and you're gonna lose your kids anyway, make her work for it. Let her know that you aren't going to be financing 18 years of vacation time for her.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:26 PM
2

Manhood Academy spam, just to let you know.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 11:18 PM
10

Only men were confirmed dead but apparently women are the real victims here.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 07:02 AM
4

A lot of really well thought out points. First time I've seen her and I have to say, well done.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 03:56 AM
3

Even though the end message was pretty damn good, and I understand why you did it, it's gonna be hard to get more people to see it.They'll just claim troll before finishing, even with the precaution.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 03:35 AM
156

White knights.....a poem I accidentally wrote just now _ Oh look what a manly man I am at the beck and call of any madame even though she says it's true she won't go to police about the screw I think I'm so alpha but I'm really a shrimp When it comes to females, even the blimps.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 05:02 PM
2

Let us learn from Dan's lesson so that we may never lose our own lives.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 10:12 PM
1

I read excerpts here and there and i don't understand what this has to do with MR.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 11:37 PM
5

No upvote for reposting the youtube comment without even giving credit to it.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 09:13 PM
1

You're totally misunderstanding my point. It is impossible to completely disassociate ethics and your judgement. When you start making calls like that, you're encroaching on the pharmacists ability to do his job properly. Not to mention, ethics is one of the things we have to study in schooling, so give me a break and stop being a naive kid that thinks pharmacists just do whatever they want. They don't. They're under constant scrutiny from the state, their own company, the APA, etc. A pharmacist…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 08:42 PM
1

The problem is that often times it's impossible to distinguish the two and they are very much not mutually exclusive. I would be hard pressed to separate out all my personal beliefs about what's right and what's wrong from my professional judgement because we all have innate biases that even we don't realize we have. If you fire someone for the reasons you stated, less pharmacists would willing to not dispense for fear of losing their jobs, essentially turning them into glorified techs. The pers…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 07:00 PM
3

So you would fire doctors for prescribing lexapro instead of citalopram or for not prescribing anything at all? Pharmacists, medical professionals that go through years of schooling, need to be able to say yes or no to if a medication is dispensed. This particular example was not the right way to do it but pharmacists need to have the right to use their own professional judgement when dispensing. In cases when a doctor cannot be reached, or a prescription isn't needed the pharmacist needs to det…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 03:09 AM
5

You act like there are people out there who don't believe that that should be the case. http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/topics/healthcare/documents/2002secondchancedenied_001.pdf
/r/MensRights08/01/12 12:56 AM
3

I did not say it was law. You have to understand, however, that everything that leaves the pharmacy is essentially under the discretion of the pharmacist because they are responsible for it. In the same way that it is the doctor's discretion to write for a certain prescription and not another, it is a pharmacist's discretion to fill it. If this was not the case then all a pharmacist would be is a mindless pill counter. I'm not supporting this particular use of refusal to sell, but there are inst…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 09:07 PM
-1

Technically speaking a pharmacist can refuse to sell. It's usually based on personal ethics, religion, or professional judgement but most pharmacists do not do this. Edit: Downvotes for explaining pharmacy?
/r/MensRights07/01/12 06:50 PM
11

I used to work in CVS as an intern and in multiple others in NY and NJ and I can tell you that this is not representative of the pharmacy profession. I used to sell Plan B to practically anyone that had ID on them or looked at least over 27. I'm planning to get my license sometime next year and I wanted to say that the ethics demonstrated by this pharmacist were extremely poor.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 06:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter