TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rorschach_And_Prozac Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by Rorschach_And_Prozac on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I've been through more than one of these type of "pulled aside and try to apologize" conversations. Most recent ones as a union steward where a member of management fucked up and wanted to try to prevent a grievance from getting filed. I brief that the best solution to these conversations where the one side is clearly fucked up is to sit looking at them quietly while they talk, and then when they are done talking say "is that all?" And then leave the meeting. If they insist on more, then "I unde…
/r/MensRights03/02/26 05:45 PM
17

If she serves the absolute maximum sentence, the kid will be just old enough to drink when she gets out.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 12:12 AM
5

I'm currently raising kids. It is easy. The fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:44 PM
86

I do all of that stuff in addition to my job, since my wife works. We take turns with the house stuff. It's all SO EASY. I wish I could just do that stuff all day instead of going to work.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 08:52 PM
8

Those women can't get sex from the men they want to have sex with. They could lower their standards and almost all of them could have sex. That's voluntary. In general, women control access to sex, and men control access to relationships. In general.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:33 PM
-1

FTFY = fuck that; fuck you
/r/MensRights19/08/22 05:38 PM
199

No feminists in a house fire.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 02:17 AM
4

An unfair rule can be applied either fairly or unfairly
/r/MensRights08/09/21 12:27 AM
4

It should be removed. But if it is not yet removed, it should be applied fairly
/r/MensRights07/09/21 11:53 PM
6

You're not supposed to pronounce it. It's not spoken aloud, merely posted online.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 01:13 AM
37

Babies can't consent to anything, including getting part of their genitals cut off, you sick fuck.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 01:48 PM
3

I believe you're right, good find. But I can't tell from the product description whether that product is drywall with a fancy side, or an entirely different product. The break in the picture looks exactly like what broken drywall looks like.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 02:11 PM
42

99% that is drywall. Look at the edges of the break
/r/MensRights12/09/20 11:52 AM
6

Was Eleanor Bumpurs killed twice?
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:37 PM
1

And Barack Obama... and Bernie Sanders...
/r/MensRights14/04/20 05:59 AM
13

It's not the same as the boy scouts, if my facts are clear. The boy scouts is a private organization that made the decision to allow girls in. Their decision completely. This STEM group is a PUBLIC institution, and is not legally allowed to discriminate based on protected class (such as gender). Private organizations can exclude anyone for any reason.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 09:54 PM
133

What was the time frame there? He asked, then immediately ejaculated before they could answer? He asked, and then they just stared at him, not saying yes or no, until he got off? He asked, and while they were pondering, he quickly rubbed one out in the few seconds before they answered? This story makes no sense, regardless of him admitting it.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 12:29 PM
4

How much less could you care?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:13 PM
5

The Aristocrats!
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:08 PM
2

"It's not my job to educate you"
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:34 PM
28

You've read it all. Do you think the original person is going to respond with reasoned arguments and sources on why women have always been the primary victims of war? I mean poverty?
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:24 AM
13

13% of the population makes up 50% of the poverty?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:44 PM
0

You are literally wrong.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:21 AM
5

You are wrong. I'm not willing to put myself in much danger to save other people's kids, because I value myself and my own kid more than a bus full of not my kids.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 06:00 AM
7

I think you totally misread what I said
/r/MensRights19/10/18 05:32 AM
17

Depends on the amount of danger. I have a kid of my own I'm not willing to leave without a dad. Sorry, bus full of not-my-kids dangling over the edge of the cliff.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:16 PM
2

Why do you have women leading your all boys packs? Do you have men leading your all girl packs?
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:25 PM
2

His lack of punctuation definitely made it hard to read, and easy to misinterpret.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:08 PM
9

He said high ranking officers, like the ones you listed. Not high ranking officers, like you. He wasn't calling you a high ranking officer.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:12 AM
25

Do what? A critical thinker and logical person would look for sources in the logical place. Right under the video in the description. They are literally right there.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:35 PM
2

Oh man, this is great. It's like you're in elementary school. Top quality cringe.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:24 PM
2

You're still mixing up who you're responding to. How do you deal with the embarrassment?
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:51 PM
2

Me? I didn't admit anything. I think the guy who is accusing other people of being stupid should look at usernames before commenting. Irony
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:52 PM
3

Ayyy friendo, you've gotten mixed up on who is stupid here.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:36 PM
5

Hey maybe read the post before commenting with an opinion. Pro tip.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 05:01 PM
11

Yeah, that or ironic gilding.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:08 PM
25

No, dude, you really are just not understanding what the guy is saying. At all. Maybe go back and try to reread his comments and think about it a little more. He's saying that IF the company used something subjective like an interview. The man who sued would not have been able to prove SUFFICIENTLY that he was more qualified. The company could have said the woman did better on the interview, and the lawsuit would have gotten nowhere. What the company DID use to promote people is strictly objecti…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:06 PM
11

Who are you talking about? I'm confused who tucked tail and ran.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 12:14 AM
3

You don't back out by saying "I'm backing out" then following it with a retort. That's pretty childish.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 11:40 AM
3

A gift card to honeybaked hams is insensitive to some people, I'll give you that for sure. But absolutely no evidence of a wage gap. I thought that's what we were talking about. I don't know what you mean by not being able to prove your point. Are there no studies that have been done on the subject? No class action lawsuits filled over pay discrimination? Nothing tangible to support the idea that a wage gap exists other than anecdotal evidence? I can name two industries off the top of my head in…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 11:12 PM
3

Does your old place of employment know your reddit username? If somehow they do, make a throwaway account and name a company you have witnessed this. But sure, don't name a company. Name an industry or a career. Which industries and careers does the wage gap exist in? Yeah, some things are possible or plausible. But I've never seen any shred of wage gap. I'm asking you to point me in the direction of where it exists. Where have you seen it. Specific details, and not useless generalities.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:01 PM
2

Which companies, industries, and careers?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:06 PM
2

Which companies, industries, and careers?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:06 PM
2

"Id like to point out that discrimination is not letting someone like me have a job because I'm autistic" Is what you actually said, referring to you specifically, not "someone". You went out of your way to let people know you have autism. Which is entirely off point and irrelevant especially considering you've never been discriminated against for a job position because of it. And since it hasn't happened, why do you think it would be a good example? Is it your fetish to let people know you have…
/r/MensRights11/12/16 12:08 AM
7

Yes you got me. Thatsmyfetish.gif Why not just answer the question, though? You said in your original response that real discrimination is when people refuse to hire you because you're autistic. How exactly do you let them know that you're autistic, so that they can discriminate against you.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:32 PM
3

How exactly do you go about letting prospective employers know that you are autistic, so that they can discriminate against you? Do you put that on your resume, or blurt it out in an interview?
/r/MensRights10/12/16 06:56 PM
21

Does the autism cause you to think that people care about you being autistic? Otherwise why bring it up?
/r/MensRights10/12/16 05:35 PM
2

You're too dumb to debate.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:31 AM
15

Naw, dawg. That's not correct. Gender dysphoria is the condition that transgender people have. You're deliberately being obtuse
/r/MensRights21/08/16 11:13 PM
26

Transgender is not a condition, gender dysphoria is the condition.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 08:39 PM
2

I did 6 years in the navy, and my 2 of IRR is over. If they tried to draft me, I would dodge that shit like you wouldn't believe. This country doesn't own me. A second option would be to go Ali style conscientious objector.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:36 PM
22

Those are all great points and I think we can continue this logic. A lot of thieves don't realize what they are doing qualifies as stealing. They don't think taking things from a big store like Walmart is stealing, because it's not coming from the wallets of the employees. They didn't break into the cashier's house and take THEIR stuff after all, so what's the issue. That's why there's an effort to teach black people not to steal. It's not an assumption that black people are 100% thieves, it's t…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:29 PM
0

Did you reply to the wrong person? I didn't say it should apply to men only. I don't think it should. How did you get that from what I wrote? And what does who initiates more domestic violence have to do with how much force you should apply to self defense?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:10 PM
14

Not really. I think he just means that you should show some thought even if the other person isn't. If a small dude slaps you, maybe don't curb stomp them even if you can. Admittedly that's an exaggeration.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:25 PM
9

That one was dropped, because neither one of them were at the place she said she was raped, according to video evidence.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 03:19 PM
-3

Naw dawg, he's got good points. You aren't contributing anything, though.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:19 PM
0

Ah, you didn't read it. That's fine.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 12:52 PM
0

OK.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:20 AM
–

That's not news to me, and I agree with everything you said. And you put it very succinctly. I just wanted to maybe talk to the guy to get him to consider a few points from a different perspective. My shit got downvoted though, so it was obviously not wanted.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:48 AM
0

"you don't have anything to back up your position, regardless of age" Open and shut dismissive. Not a question, but a statement. I was only trying to find out his age so I can tell who I'm talking to. It would help me with a starting point to the conversation. I wouldn't expect to prove his position wrong, but maybe get him to consider some other points. All of my stuff got downvoted, so clearly my input was unwanted.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:45 AM
–

I don't know, but I doubt it. I don't go to those forums. If you have time give this a read. If not, no big deal, it's a pretty long blog post. If you do, let me know what you think of it. http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage/
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:39 AM
–

You seem very dismissive and not open to any discussion.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:30 AM
–

Oh I meant many women I speak to in real life. The ones that identify as feminist are not toxic man haters any more than the ones who don't identify as feminists. I didn't mean to let on that there are many media-popular sources. That's my bad. The feminists that are widely popular and generate the most media attention tend to be the crazies.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:27 AM
–

Well, I'm going to respectfully disagree. I think we are looking at this from different perspectives. If you don't mind me asking, how old are you?
/r/MensRights29/12/15 08:49 PM
–

Unless you're born with at least moderate physical or mental handicaps, the game is not rigged against you any more than billions of other people. You can always improve yourself or lower your standards. Sure you can choose to not participate if you don't want to date or have sex or whatever, but doing it because you don't have the cards stacked in your favor is just giving up.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 08:31 PM
0

Does that mean you've just run out of nonsense to repeat? Let me know if you have any more points to discuss. It upsets me that someone who is supposed to be in my camp on these issues is so ignorant and full of hate.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 08:16 PM
1

To be fair, question 2 is a statement.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 08:12 PM
0

That is what you got? I've said like three or four times times that being anti feminist is not the same as criticizing feminism. If you don't know the difference, there's really no point in discussing anything with you. Criticizing feminism = the gender wage gap is a myth, here are some sources. Anti feminism = feminists are garbage and everything they do and say is garbage. Anyone who questions this is wrong. You are in the second category. You are unreasonable.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 08:07 PM
–

Please, oh please, quote me where I said criticizing feminism is wrong. It's not. Every idea and ideology deserves scrutiny. Being against something just because it comes from a feminist is wrong. That is not the same as criticizing specific points to determine their veracity. You are still either deliberately misreading, or you just don't understand the words. Maybe you aren't stupid, but have reading comprehension issues.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:56 PM
–

I specifically said EVERY ideology should be criticized. Either you are deliberately misreading, or are incredibly stupid.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:38 PM
–

By feminists, yes, by every person who identifies as feminist, no. They are all different people, with different thoughts, experiences, motivations, etc just like you and me. You are conflating criticism with "dismiss in its entirety". They are not the same thing. Most of what they say may be misguided, ignorant, or deliberately harmful, but to just be totally anti feminist and dismiss everything out-of-hand makes you just as bad as them. Fine, you're anti feminist, I get it. You're one of the p…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:37 PM
–

I could say that there are some people who are anti feminist, and there are some people who are anti women. These two subsets of people can, but do not necessarily have to, intersect. That is much more clear, but also very wordy, and I think it detracts from what I was saying.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:01 PM
–

I'm not conflating them. That's why I listed them separately each time and why I said I THINK that MRM is not about anti feminist and I KNOW it's not about anti women. And again I agree with you, there's nothing wrong with being critical of any ideology. That's how you root out the bullshit. But that also applies to the ones we hold, like MRM. Hating or disagreeing with everything that comes from a feminist, SIMPLY BECAUSE it comes from a feminist is as bad as how those radical feminists are dis…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:56 PM
2

It takes a lot less effort to lower your standards than to become a higher standard. Some people go that route. And lowered standards doesn't have to mean ugly and fat. What if she is just boring, with nothing interesting to talk about? A dead fish in the sack? Freeloading off of her parents with no ambition? Those things are also very unattractive. But, yeah, I'm with you. I'd prefer to make myself better rather than settling for whatever I can get.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:49 PM
–

I totally agree with you. They do seem to hate women. But they don't have to be the only ones. There are some people who love to see anything anti women or anti feminist, even when it has nothing to do with MRM. I was just responding to his specific question about why this article is in this sub. I don't think MRM is inherently anti feminist and I know it is not anti women.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:42 PM
–

I agree with you here. Dating/mating will always be done at some sort of scarcity. If you fail repeatedly, as a male or female, you've got two basic options. Lower your standards or make yourself more attractive.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:20 PM
–

There are a lot of them, but they are not loud, not divisive, and as such, don't get a bunch of media exposure.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:14 PM
–

Because some amount of women haters or just feminism haters take refuge in the MRM and get some (hopefully small) amount of support from the extremists that any sufficiently large group is bound to have. I hope most will join me in downvoting these types of posts. (Not reporting since it doesn't actually break any of the sub's rules). This kind of stuff just isn't helpful. It doesn't bring any new awareness, or further any causes.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:00 PM
5

This sub is tiny and insignificant compared to the national media attention some radical feminists get. It would be crazy for you to think otherwise. I doubt you could name one MRA who was portrayed in a positive light by the media, whether he (edit, or she) is a radical or not. Until you do, I'll give you a feminist example. Sarkeesian. Also, are you just here to spread hatred and toxicity? Please take that somewhere else.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 08:38 AM
5

You've got great points, and I'm trying to upvote your stuff, I'm just leaving this here to remind me to respond when I get a chance not on my phone
/r/MensRights28/12/15 11:18 PM
33

You're right, I've never met these radicals in person in either. However, many non radicals will share some of that stuff via social media. People I actually know in real life. When I talk to them about it the response varies from oh I didn't realize how off-base and radical this stuff was, to very passive aggressive dismissal of my concerns because I'm a man, to just outright ignoring me. However, when I call out red pillers and nice guys on their bullshit, I almost always get engagement and di…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 11:02 PM
95

A problem we see is that the loud extremists are not being called out by their moderate counterparts. In general, I mean. I'm more than willing to agree that most feminists are not man haters. But the loudest, most vitriolic feminists only get countered by the opposite spectrum. It would be better if many moderate feminists spoke up against all the hate speech. Yeah, most people know that not all feminists are like this, but those that are seem to be VERY popular with that movement, with VERY li…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 10:30 PM
4

I can tell that you do not, and have never, worked in a hazardous job where a death, or even serious injury, happened in your industry. Nobody thinks it is acceptable, and massive amount of effort is given to finding out the cause and how it can be prevented if current safety protocols were not enough. You're spouting nonsense, thank goodness you're being downvoted.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 09:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter