TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RossParka Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by RossParka on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I really only care about how to improve the world. I don't care about figuring out who's to blame unless I think it will help to improve the world. The Democrats have lost voters in large part because they've told voters they're terrible people if they vote for the other party. Now you're telling the Democratic leadership that they're still bad people. What will that accomplish? What I see here is a small shift toward a better direction. I wish it were larger but it's better than nothing. It may…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/25 06:26 PM
0

In a representative democracy, parties should base their platforms on what the voters want, not on what party leaders want. Please don't punish the Democrats for doing the right thing. They've already been punished enough for not doing it a decade or more ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/25 05:59 PM
1

my own high school principal deliberately struck me in my testicles in front of a large assembly of students and teachers who cheered for his prank ... What? In the 1990s? Where?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/25 05:50 PM
3

It looks like they posted the survey link in anti-circumcision subs on Reddit, and nowhere else on Reddit, and the number of survey responses (250) is not much larger than the number of upvotes it got on those subs. The front page of the web site also makes the surveyor's bias clear, before you click through to the survey itself. I think the results have no scientific value, unfortunately.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/25 05:28 AM
2

It could be anyone who lived nearby - who might not even have known he was sick.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:22 AM
0

told him he could not use cancer as an excuse I watched the video, which is only 2 minutes long, and she didn't say that. My guess is that she didn't even understand that he had cancer. It was extremely difficult to understand anything that he said because of a combination of his accent and audio dropouts. He twice said something that sounded perhaps like "can-SAR-per-son," one word with the stress on the second syllable, but even after listening several times I'm not totally sure I know what it…
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:21 AM
3

If you want to cheat, then don't get married. Fine, but why should it be a crime? If marriage is a contract, then adultery is a breach of contract. It's grounds for divorce, and the cheating partner tends to fare badly in the divorce proceedings. That's how it works in places where adultery is not criminalized, and I assume that's how it'll now work in Taiwan. Its not being a criminal offense doesn't mean you can do it without repercussions.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 08:53 PM
15

There may be a real story in here, but everything about this article screams untrustworthy to me - the random capitalization, the sometimes bizarre claims ("placing algorithms into my postings and articles") and the fact that she keeps name-dropping Bill Gates even though he hasn't been the CEO of Microsoft since 2000. She says she plans to file a Title VII lawsuit, but a search for her name at justia.com only turned up an unrelated case from 2015.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 05:49 PM
52

According to some comments it was in his contract that not only he but his family had to adhere to certain standards of behavior. In general I think it should be illegal to try to control employees outside of work hours, but I'm willing to make an exception for celebrities. Katai was paid over $1 million per year, and for that kind of money it's reasonable to demand that he not just kick a ball around but also be a wholesome role model, including being married to a wholesome wife. Yes it's stupi…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 11:56 AM
0

I like the word "man" better than the word "person" and I wish we could just make it gender-neutral, as it apparently was in Old English, but I see no path to accomplishing that. The point (in my mind) is not to try to change the sex/gender breakdowns of particular lines of employment but to care less about the sex/gender of people. Thinking that a person's sex/gender is super important and everything should be broken down along sex/gender lines is the essence of sexism. When people decide that …
/r/MensRights02/06/20 03:40 PM
5

I'm in favor of this as long as it's done universally. Violence against people instead of violence again women, people's marches instead of women's marches, etc.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 03:28 PM
7

From the abstract of the first paper: low BS ["benevolent sexism"] male targets were judged to be low in hostility towards women only if they explicitly stated that their low BS was motivated by egalitarian values, otherwise men’s low BS was assumed to indicate misogyny. Here are a couple of the statements rated by their fictitious low-BS male target: "In a disaster, women ought to be rescued before men": somewhat disagree "Women, compared to men, tend to have a superior moral sensibility": some…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 07:22 PM
1

It's a clickbait headline. A boy did die while in his mother's care, and the boy's father was jailed after criticizing the judge. Why would either of those things shock you? You've probably constructed a story in your head that links these two events, and that story is what's really shocking you. You were manipulated into doing that by the headline writer. According to the actual story, the mother was found not responsible for the boy's death. Sometimes people are not responsible for the deaths …
/r/MensRights25/05/20 03:28 PM
13

use that as an excuse to strip away their civil [r]ights What I don't understand is that they aren't suggesting that civil rights be stripped away - they're acting as though they've never even heard of the concept of civil rights. There's always been a mob mentality among the unwashed masses in connection with any sort of heinous crime. (Even that I find hard to understand in this world of mandatory grade-school education, where every adult should have taken a unit in civics at some point.) But …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/20 12:04 AM
1

It's not at all unusual for diseases/disorders to affect one sex more than the other. Women get rheumatoid arthritis at around twice the rate of men, for example. I think men have a higher mortality rate from many respiratory diseases. The likely reason for these differences is various evolutionary tradeoffs related to childbirth and nursing or to traditional (on evolutionary timescales) sex roles. For example (from Wikipedia): "Females need more calcium during pregnancy and lactation. The body …
/r/MensRights17/05/20 11:13 PM
33

I find it incredibly depressing that an analysis that simply applies basic concepts of civil rights is now so unusual that it counts as "excellent," and that so many powerful people, including Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and the chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, seem to have not the slightest understanding of civil rights. The ACLU is suing over these new regulations. How did the Overton window shift this far? What the hell is going on?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/20 10:18 PM
3

This is consistent with their November 2018 tweet that shocked a lot of people. It happens often that once reputable organizations change and coast for a while on their old reputation until the brand is destroyed. There are probably a lot of seniors who will keep donating to the ACLU until they die, while paying no attention to what the ACLU is doing with the money.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 04:40 PM
6

I understand how someone can be afraid of a specific gender due to their life, and discriminatory shelters are a great way to help someone going through such a tragedy. If someone is afraid of half of the human race just because they share a trait with someone who wronged them, that's an irrational phobia. As far as I know, the best way to counter those fears is through exposure to other people from the feared group who aren't like the specific person that triggered the fear. Especially people w…
/r/MensRights13/05/20 07:16 PM
25

This is not a news article. It's a random person speculating that if, hypothetically, Heard were charged and convicted of faking evidence, she could be hypothetically sentenced to 3 years in prison for it. And she could hypothetically be fired from Aquaman 2, if Warner Brothers hypothetically decided to do that.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 03:00 PM
79

That's an instagram post by user @bloodygoreshit where (I assume) you got the image. There is no evidence there either. Looking at their other posts doesn't leave me particularly inclined to trust them. Don't you understand that a false accusation of anything, including rape, could be made in exactly this way?
/r/MensRights05/05/20 04:42 PM
150

I don't want to be that person, but there's no evidence that anything in this image is true. A web search on the obvious keywords turns up nothing. Given that people believing accusations without evidence is the precise problem at issue, I can't help thinking that anyone who upvotes this post is part of the problem.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 04:33 PM
3

This document suggests that the rate of infant circumcisions in hospitals hovered around 60% from 1979 to 2010. In the breakdown by region you can see a large decline in the rate in the western US ending around 1990, while in the other regions and in the west after 1990 the rate has been fairly stable. This only counts infant circumcisions in hospitals so the real rate is presumably somewhat higher.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 09:59 PM
3

Lots of Trump voters are worried about immigrants from poorer countries taking their jobs. They probably think of those immigrant hordes as swarthy in a vague sort of way. That's nothing like the movement we're talking about here, which has clearly defined races, clear rules for placement in those racial categories, and clear and openly stated ideas about how people in those categories should be treated differently based on category membership. Similar movements exist among people who consider t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 06:31 PM
8

Summary: she mentions a 2002 study of American men who were circumcised as adults (123 surveys sent out, 43 responses). They found there was a decrease in erectile function and penile sensitivity. But most (63%) reported improved satisfaction because of less pain during intercourse and/or liking the appearance of their penis more. Another survey found that 87% of college-aged women preferred the appearance of circumcised penises. So there are two reasons to get circumcised: because it's medicall…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 02:52 AM
6

It hasn't been peer reviewed or published yet. If it's a good paper it'll eventually be published but that could take months (or years). The coronavirus situation is evolving rapidly so there's no choice but to depend on preprints to stay up to date. Here's the preprint. I'm not qualified to evaluate it but I see nothing obviously wrong with it.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 02:34 AM
1

If you search for "lesbian couple sues" then I'm sure you'll get many hits because why wouldn't you? If you search for this exact headline, you'll get hits from people who act like it's true because they were fooled by it just like you were. To find out whether it's actually true, you have to trace it back to its source.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:47 PM
1

The stories have nothing in common except that a lesbian couple and sperm donor are involved (and not in the same way). This story is not a fictionalized account of that story, it's just fiction.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:40 PM
12

I'll just copy-paste the comment I wrote last time: I can't find this story at thesun.co.uk According to reverse image search, the photo is from a story of a lesbian couple being crowned prom king and queen This exact headline with this photo does appear in "the shit news", which says "Disclaimer: All the posts are satirical and are not meant to be taken seriously"
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:15 AM
11

By introducing more boy-friendly teaching strategies in the classroom, the school was able to close the gender gap in just one year. At the same time, girls' reading and writing performance improved. Sounds like it's not so much boy-friendly strategies as just plain better strategies.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 09:35 PM
5

The divorce settlement is not public. The amount she's paying is "rumored" to be $140 million or £140 million or $180 million or £144 million or $90 million depending on which "news" story you read. A blogger at forbes.com said last year: Adele has already gifted Konecki a property worth over $600,000, which some see as an indication that the split may be amicable. Adele herself said in a Vanity Fair interview that money is “not that important a part of my life.” Regardless, it's just stupidly r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/20 05:58 PM
19

I'm not particularly interested in what Naomi Alderman - a novelist and game writer who got her start in Buffy the Vampire Slayer fanfiction according to Wikipedia - thinks would happen if hypothetically a bunch of people got electrokinesis powers. I'd just as soon guess the consequences for myself, or read some random redditor's guess, if I cared. I'm also not interested in what Guardian deputy literary editor Justine Jordan thinks of the book. Like Alderman, she doesn't strike me as an intelle…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/20 04:32 PM
3

I'm seeing this headline over and over. If you read the actual article you'll find it's just some random writer speculating that if, hypothetically, Heard were to be charged with falsifying evidence, and convicted, she might hypothetically be sentenced to three years in prison under California law. She hasn't been charged. I don't know if there's even an investigation going on. There are probably tens of thousands of Redditors who now think that she's about to go to prison because no one bothers…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 07:49 AM
2

Here's the full text of the judgment. It was a unanimous 7-0 decision. They concluded that any rational person looking at the evidence presented in the trial would have had reasonable doubts about Pell's guilt. After looking at their summary of the evidence I'd have to agree. In fact I'm inclined to think he's really innocent of this, whatever else he may have done.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:51 PM
34

Apparently she hasn't even been charged with anything yet. The writer just speculates that she could theoretically be charged with falsifying evidence, for which the maximum penalty is 3 years in prison.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 07:10 PM
5

Here's the article. In September 2017, Jonathan Vanderhagen’s two-year-old son Killian passed away while in the care of his mother. Vanderhagen had previously lost a legal battle in which he petitioned for sole custody of the child, citing the unfitness of Killian’s mother. Police found there was no evidence Killian’s mother was responsible for his death. Vanderhagen does not agree. Following his son’s death, the grieving dad made several posts on social media criticizing Rachel Rancilio, the Ma…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 06:12 AM
3

The U.S. Women's National Team lost once to an under-15 boys team. They play these informal matches regularly and usually they win. The loss made the news because it was unusual. (And I suspect they were going easy on the kids.)
/r/MensRights04/04/20 07:29 AM
5

There are plenty of posts and comments in this sub that I disagree with, so I'm speaking only for myself. I just think that people should be treated as people. In my ideal world, there are no transgender people because there's no gender. You just do you, and it's not masculine or feminine, it's you. In my ideal world, gendered pronouns are as shocking and unthinkable as racial pronouns. I think we're very far from that world. Many (most?) people seem to be very sexist, including many (most?) sel…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 07:03 AM
3

Religious belief is not a get-out-of-jail-free card. You can't keep slaves or stone adulterers to death just because your religious text says that it's okay to do that and you genuinely believe it's the inerrant word of God. I agree with others here that cutting off part of the genitalia of infants is a gross violation of basic human rights. It should be illegal. That's what laws are for. Religions change all the time to adapt to changing secular beliefs. If male genital mutilation was banned, t…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 01:35 AM
2

Wikipedia's article on matriarchy says "Most anthropologists hold that there are no known societies that are unambiguously matriarchal." Obviously there have been female rulers at least as far back as Ancient Egypt, but there's no evidence of any society where politics was female-dominated as a matter of course.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 08:49 PM
1

The headline is "Trump says US won’t cover Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s security costs." There's nothing in the article that suggests that they asked or expected the US to pay: In a statement, a spokesperson for the couple said that they have “no plans to ask the U.S. government for security resources,” and have arranged for private security detail, according to the Evening Standard. There's nothing suggesting that they're upset by Trump's tweet. And it was literally just a tweet. No formal …
/r/MensRights01/04/20 03:15 PM
4

Fair enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/20 02:12 AM
4

This is a good example of what I'm talking about. The fact that more men than women smoke (at least in China and Italy) is certainly part of the reason that more men than women have died. If (making this up for the sake of argument) men have more ACE2 receptors than women on average, that could also affect the bucketed mortality rates. If you bucket people by height instead of sex, you'll find (I imagine) that the mortality rate is higher among taller people. But the virus probably doesn't care …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/20 05:45 PM
5

"Men and women" is never the right way to divide people up. Either it's a proxy for some other trait, in which case you should talk about the trait that's actually relevant to your argument, or it's a sign that you think of the sexes as essentially different, in which case you should stop being sexist. Like... why is there an M or F on drivers' licenses and passports? Your photo is right there, you either look like the photo or not, so what's it for? There's a debate about whether people should …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/20 04:34 PM
2

This guy seems to know absolutely nothing about the case except what he read in this BBC article. You may as well just read the article and draw your own conclusions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/20 03:31 AM
17

Hijacking top comment to point out that I can't find this story at thesun.co.uk According to reverse image search, the photo is from a story of a lesbian couple being crowned prom king and queen This exact headline with this photo does appear in "the shit news", which says "Disclaimer: All the posts are satirical and are not meant to be taken seriously" Please do sixty seconds of online fact checking before you post these things.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:35 PM
18

These things usually survive because they please the opposite sex. Zhou Guizhen, 86, says she regrets binding her feet. "But at the time, if you didn't bind your feet, no one would marry you," she says. (source) Sexual selection is also the reason that some women are burdened with large breasts that cause back pain and other problems, but I'm not sure what can be done about that at this point. Circumcision at least can be banned and gradually stigmatized as foot binding was. Any decade now...
/r/MensRights20/03/20 05:36 AM
1

There's a large and significant (p < 0.01) difference in callback rate in the two jobs that were traditionally female dominated (waitstaff and data entry). In the other two (customer service and sales) there's no significant difference in the callback rate (p >> 0.01). The aggregated value for the four jobs doesn't seem all that useful since it represents the average experience of a person who applies indiscriminately for those four job types, and I'm not convinced that such people exist. I thin…
/r/MensRights15/03/20 11:41 PM
5

This study covered only secretarial and accounting jobs, and only in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. I'm unhappy but not too surprised to hear that there's still a high level of sex discrimination in secretarial jobs. Accounting surprises me more. In any case it's far from obvious that this will extend to other jobs, or other countries. This meta-analysis ("What Do Field Experiments of Discrimination in Markets Tell Us? A Meta Analysis of Studies Conducted Since 2000" by Judith Rich) discusses…
/r/MensRights12/03/20 05:58 PM
8

I looked through the comments for evidence that this actually happened and failed to find it. But somebody did link to a similar experiment that seems legit: Original post Genderswapped copy
/r/MensRights11/03/20 01:15 AM
1

I guess you mean the first link on that page, the Act on Integrated Protection Measures against Gender Violence (2004). It's 48 pages long; I skimmed it. While the language is pervasively sexist, and I strongly object to that, I didn't see anything to suggest that "men go to jail automatically if accused." If you think there's language in there supporting that claim, you'll have to point it out. My guess is that you're misinterpreting the legalese.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 09:02 PM
2

There are no gaps. There are broad distributions of traits, and if you bucket people by sex there are substantially overlapping distributions with different means and variances. Your life will be shaped by your traits, not by the traits of some aggregated stereotype of your sex. Sexism means mentally assigning people to buckets by sex and then thinking about the buckets instead of the people. If you want to see the world as it really is, don't be sexist.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 08:35 PM
2

I don't see how this can be constitutional. Article I, section 8 of the California constitution says "A person may not be disqualified from entering or pursuing a business, profession, vocation, or employment because of sex [...]." This law creates a situation where only women can be legally considered for open board positions in some cases. It's exactly as constitutional as, for example, a law requiring privately held corporations to employ at most one woman. I don't see what argument could be …
/r/MensRights07/03/20 12:29 AM
1

It is IPC376. The interpretation of this law says – if a couple has physical relation then the boy is liable to marry the girl if she wants it, otherwise the boy is deemed to have raped the girl!!! Rape is defined in section 375 of the penal code, not section 376. The definition is clearly written and there's no way it could be interpreted as saying that failing to marry after sex converts the sex into rape. Women reporting consensual sex as rape because they regret it after the fact is somethin…
/r/MensRights04/03/20 07:21 PM
4

I keep seeing "woman commits crime" articles in this sub. How is this a men's rights issue? She's in custody and charged with "first-degree rape of a child, molestation and dealing child pornography, among other charges." They have video evidence and a confession. My guess is that she'll spend a significant amount of time in prison. Even if she ends up getting a light punishment - which, I want to reiterate, is in the realm of speculative fiction at this point - you can't draw any useful conclus…
/r/MensRights04/03/20 04:29 AM
7

The first screenshot was taken when the post was 7 hours old and had not yet been deleted. The second screenshot was taken when the post was 1 day old and had been deleted. It was deleted 1 hour before the second screenshot was taken, so the comment explaining the deletion was 1 hour old at that time. I haven't double-checked that the screenshot is legitimate, but your objection to it makes no sense whatsoever.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 08:18 PM
4

Her attorney made the argument, not her, according to the actual article. And I think it's a reasonable argument. She was charged with a crime for having consensual sex with a legal adult. It's one thing to be fired from your teaching job for having sex with a student, which is probably a code of conduct violation. It's quite another thing to make it a criminal offense.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 07:11 PM
1

An Alabama state representative introduced this bill as a symbolic protest against that state's recent abortion ban. It's supposed to sound oppressive and crazy - that's the point. It's not going to become law. No one wants it to become law, not even the representative who introduced it.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:29 AM
5

No, "Alabama" doesn't "want to require men" to do that. One Democratic state representative introduced the bill as a symbolic protest again the abortion ban. It's meant to sound oppressive and crazy - that's the only point of it. No one wants or expects it to become law.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:48 AM
12

I don't think she should lose her acting career for this. I think she should serve prison time for this. As a side effect of imprisonment she probably wouldn't be able to appear in films. But if she was somehow able to film her part while in prison, I would be fine with that. Being blacklisted from Hollywood isn't an appropriate punishment for what she seems to have done. Imprisonment is. By the same token, if she serves time and is released, she should be given a chance to rebuild her life. Her…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 04:57 AM
9

In October, Branson [the DA] dismissed a case against a woman who was charged with filing a false rape report, after a Lawrence police detective said in an affidavit that he thought the woman reported the rape because she was angry the man involved was seeing another woman. [...] Two similar cases were dismissed in December. [...] Branson said a major concern was that agencies handled their investigations differently. “We didn’t want people to have a different experience based upon who investiga…
/r/MensRights09/02/20 07:25 AM
7

Title and headline are technically correct but misleading. This is not a case of someone being caught shoplifting and then being allowed to get away with it because "tampons should be free," as I guessed on reading the headline. What happened is that someone photographed an anti-shoplifting sign in Tesco's tampon section and posted it on Twitter, where people got mad. What got them mad, I think, is that the sign was in that section specifically. I vaguely remember a similar kerfuffle some time a…
/r/MensRights09/02/20 04:46 AM
2

No. Different people are different, and sex is correlated with a lot of other traits. But a correlation, no matter how strong, doesn't justify discrimination. More men than women commit certain violent crimes, but each person accused of the crime needs to be tried as themself, not as a representative of their sex. They should be judged only on what the evidence shows that they personally did. If that leads to more men than women in prison for those crimes - which it would - that's okay, because …
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:53 PM
1

Feeling like one can't express oneself in the presence of anyone of the opposite sex will cause huge problems in life. It's a phobia that they'll have to work through at some point, and sooner would be better. Phobias are best cured by confrontation. And I think there's no better opportunity for that than to be in the company of people of the opposite sex with the same problem as them - i.e. the problem that you've created this organization to solve - because it's an opportunity to bond over sha…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 05:58 PM
3

I mean, I feel the same way about male-only or female-only organizations as I feel about white-only or black-only organizations. There are situations where you reasonably want to exclude certain people, but race or sex is never the right criterion for that, because it isn't a problem that needs to be solved. E.g., quiet study spaces make sense. You can kick people out if they make noise. Kicking people out of the study space for being black or female on the theory that black or female people tal…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:39 PM
0

30 of the 32 Google reviews are from the last two days. The two older ones give her five stars, one with no text and the other saying only "London for senate 2020." I don't trust any of the reviews.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:40 AM
1

I was hoping for details so I could look up the case.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 04:34 AM
2

Two consecutive unrelated rapes by strangers seems so statistically unlikely that I have trouble believing it could happen anywhere but a war zone. It seems much more likely to me that the girl recanted her story.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 04:20 AM
1

What case is this? (Or what law?)
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:59 AM
1

Certainly in the case that one parent was raped, or duped (e.g. hole poked in condom) they should not be held responsible. I just think voluntary parents should have some responsibilities. (And I know there are cases of people in these situations who were forced to pay child support. I'm not saying the system isn't broken.)
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:40 AM
2

By that logic it would be impossible to collect on any debt, and the whole economy would collapse. I'm not saying the system isn't broken but there's nothing intrinsically wrong with the concept of child support. If both parents agree to have a child, they are jointly responsible for raising it. That's effectively a debt to the child, and it makes sense to split that debt like any other debt or asset in a divorce. That means that both parents share equally in the raising of the child, or one par…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:13 AM
2

They seem to use p < 0.1 as their statistical significance test, which is quite weak. Few of their conclusions hold even at the p < 0.05 level that is more typical in the social sciences. And social science results have been found to be unreliable at rates far higher than the p-values would suggest. I think it's a mistake to conclude much of anything from this paper in isolation.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 02:52 AM
1

Come on, it's a party. I think people are ridiculously over-obsessed with sex and the sexes, and I'm opposed to the whole concept of "gender reveals" on that basis. I'm also opposed to detonating explosives on dry grass. But I'm not opposed to pointless parties. Parties are in some sense pointless by their very nature, but our lives would be bleaker without them. I say hooray for the party-givers.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 02:13 AM
-3

I don't think anyone ever took her accusation seriously. There are always going to be crazy people saying dumb things. It's unfortunate but there's nothing we can do about it. It's no reason to change how you vote, unless the crazy person is a candidate in which case you probably shouldn't vote for them.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:10 AM
5

You want to falsely accuse guys? This is what you get. No, that's just sexism. The woman needing CPR is not guilty of some other woman's false accusation. Even if the specific person needing CPR has a history of falsely accusing people of sexual assault, although I couldn't blame you for being afraid to help them, they still don't deserve to die in the street. Their crimes should be handled through the legal system. If the legal system doesn't handle it well then fix the legal system. Vigilante …
/r/MensRights06/11/18 08:57 AM
0

I see no evidence of sex discrimination here. She was arrested and charged with second-degree strangulation, which seems reasonable under the circumstances.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 08:02 AM
1

“Publicly traded companies based in California would be required to appoint women to the board of directors under a measure on its way to Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk.” SB 826. Apparently the Governor signed it. This can't possibly be constitutional. The ERA is still not ratified, but the California Constitution says "A person may not be disqualified from entering or pursuing a business, profession, vocation, or employment because of sex, race, creed, color, or national or ethnic origin." (Article 1,…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 06:16 AM
12

This post title is ridiculous. The story is that a bunch of Google employees protested over a recent NYT article claiming that Google covered up sexual misconduct claims against three executives. The protesters included both men and women, as the article mentions and as you can see in this photo. It was a one-time thing. It had/has nothing to do with pay inequality, real or imagined. Google engineers work flex time; they're allowed to leave their desks as they please for the most part. There are…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 04:33 AM
2

Here is a prepublication copy of the report. It's 310 pages long. I only skimmed it looking for how they define sexual harassment. Here's a key bit from page 25: Gender harassment is by far the most common type of sexual harassment. It refers to ‘‘a broad range of verbal and nonverbal behaviors not aimed at sexual cooperation but that convey insulting, hostile, and degrading attitudes about” members of one gender (Fitzgerald, Gelfand, and Drasgow 1995, 430). Gender harassment is further defined …
/r/MensRights21/10/18 07:43 AM
1

I don't think anyone should have to register as a sex offender. If the offender is still a danger to society, they should still be incarcerated or institutionalized. If they're released, they should be able to put their past behind them and build a new life. That's the whole purpose of releasing them.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:07 PM
9

Punishing any crime disincentivizes people from confessing. There's nothing special in that regard about the crime of bearing false witness. I agree that people who confess to crimes should be treated more leniently (but not let off scot-free). But the post title doesn't say anything about confession. It could equally apply to, e.g., the Duke lacrosse case, where the accuser never recanted but other evidence proved she was lying. I think she should have been locked up for that, but as far as I k…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter