TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RothbardRand Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by RothbardRand on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

My high school newspaper had much higher editorial standards than this. I'm talking about the voice, the constantly interrupting herself, the over the top cutesy tone, the forced casualness and the run on sentences are all atrocities and lead me with the impression the writer is at about an 80 IQ. And that's not even getting into the use of snotty casual bigotry likes like the fedora remark. These people are really dumb, dumb enough to think they are superior.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:19 PM
6

/r/IAm22AndThisIsVeryDeep
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/07/17 08:28 AM
21

Esthetician? I see. It's slang for a beautician. Kinda like how I'm a garbage engineer and lawyers are esquire.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/17 05:39 PM
6

Am I wrong or is this clearly an uneducated person, rather than just autocorrected typos?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/17 05:37 PM
2

This one is not in the least bit laid back. Not cool. That's what she wishes and tells herself she it. People always seem to project their worst quality when trying to hide it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/07/17 02:41 PM
16

FWIW she has no tech credentials I'm aware of. I first heard about her as a junior marketing person at Basho where she made some stink about their developer conference.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:31 PM
2

Of course.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/07/17 01:10 AM
16

Except she isn't going to get what she really wants because she doesn't know how to describe it. She will get Chad.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/06/17 06:50 AM
49

I don't know about you, but I have a requirement reciprocity rule- if she requires a high salary, she better have one. If she wants a guy 5'10", she better be that tall.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/17 10:29 PM
6

Unless there is informed consent. E.g. Doing it to children, wrong. Adults deciding to do it to themselves, is ok. (Why? Mostly they do it due to complications or inconvenience of the way their skin formed.)
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:51 PM
3

He was not "on TV", it was closed circuit. There's a huge difference. Plus, there was nothing inappropriate about his dress. As someone in that industry, I've seen women show up in equal stuff. In fact it's a sign of pride in the industry that people don't wear suits, as such arbitrary conformity is offensive to inquiry.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:52 PM
6

Not every scientist wears zany outfits, but every outfit of scientists has at least one who does. Often several.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:23 PM
13

It's appropriate for his industry. We aren't all locked into industries where we have to express subservience via dress.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 11:39 AM
4

Can someone translate from Canadian to American? You don't have double jeopardy there?
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:27 PM
3

This is a violation of the fourth amendment, it's just the courts don't uphold the law.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:54 AM
5

Yeah I really don't know what causes this, they are raised in the same society, and I see lots to indicate they are taught better than this. So I don't get it. I date both men and women, but eventually I just stopped dealing with women. If one expresses interest I'll give her a chance but in terms of contacting I contact men. Men create a lot less BS in relationships because they are not as likely to play games and seem more... rational. Generalizations of course. But it's what works for me.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:52 AM
33

Not in 40 years. I have seen a woman help push a car once. Once. But not two women.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:54 AM
4

If you think that's a bad thing then you must oppose capitalism and individual rights.... the two things those two were champions of. I disagree with both on various issues but I respect their intentions and the fact they moved the country forward more than Hillary, trump, Jill or Bernie ever would, could or have.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 07:12 PM
2

First trailer looked that way, second was more accurate. Read my comment below. Show is not feminist and not racist like you are expecting. Main character with the titular radio show is sleeping with a white guy.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 10:47 PM
2

LOL! I saw the movie, I just watched the first episode if the TV series. It was beautifully shot - like a movie- which threw off the timing a bit, because it is a sitcom. But it works. The main character has a show titled "dear white people" but she's dating a white dude. There are four black student groups on campus representing all kinds of blacks. The only whites so far in the show are reasonable (though the show picks up right after the movie where a blackface party has been secretly instiga…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 10:45 PM
1

Dear White People is not a pro-SJW show, it makes fun of outrage culture.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 08:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter