TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Routine-Frosting9077 Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by Routine-Frosting9077 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well, we're going to have to agree to disagree then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 07:12 AM
1

Did you seriously just say men invented money so they could buy women...I don't even know what I just read.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 06:27 AM
1

Yeah, that's ridiculous. If anything, they're probably going to treat you better while they're in the relationship because, to them, you're more valuable. If someone has an abundance of options, it's easier for them to take their partner for granted because they know they can replace the relationship without much difficulty. Meanwhile, someone who doesn't have endless options is less likely to throw away a good relationship and is probably going to put more effort into making it last. I don't kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 05:53 AM
1

Social includes being partnered.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 11:56 AM
1

I don't think those are lies I do think that a lot of people actually want that, but overall lilith this is probably the first post I'll ever agree with you on, sex is awesome, and we should be more open about it. Sadly, it's not the way our culture is; we kinda have to skirt around it or use heavy implications.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 11:44 AM
1

Are you really trying to say men are being single wrong? I don't even know how to respond to that. Humans are social creatures; for 90% of people, you will want a partner, especially later in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 11:35 AM
23

I legit saw a women say *lying about wanting a relationship with a women only to have sex with her is rape* and then she proceeded to make up some bs about how men would get prosicuted under this fact, I called bs becuase for one no tf it isn't rape and 2 she never said what country and I couldn't find any evidence of this shit happening and if it is then thats even more bs.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 11:31 AM
31

no it's not
/r/MensRights26/07/26 11:27 AM
-1

They do it because a majority of men don't want to be single. The concept of doing something you don't like to get what you want is not a foreign idea, and know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 11:24 AM
-2

Pretty much this, if I know I'm not going to get anywhere being truthful. Why tell the truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 10:53 AM
1

Sex is part of it, but men do want genuine connection as well; it's why most are so willing to pay for the illusion of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 10:48 AM
-1

They also don't really care about women They do care, they just don't want to have to go through or deal with all negitive realities of trying to date. Having to be a jester and shell out a bunch of time and money just to have a negative outcome by the end of it, and being burned so much that you just grow tired of it. A lot of men are obsessed with the idea of replacing women with robots. If men had a choice between picking a robot or a real woman, most would still pick the woman; the robot is …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 10:46 AM
3

Well sadly, we don't live in a perfect world.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 10:10 AM
6

Those statistics sound shocking when they are presented without context, but they are based on a very small and highly selected group of documented cases, not the general population. Necrophilia is extremely rare, and research on it comes mostly from forensic case reports involving people who were already identified because a crime or investigation occurred. That means the data does not represent ordinary people who work around the deceased. The claim that "92% of people who commit necrophilia a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 10:01 AM
7

What's common knowledge is that the majority of cemetery workers are male, and there are no rules or laws preventing men from working in these positions. There are roughly 30,000–40,000 cemetery workers, and around 80–90% of them are male. Out of all of that, there have only been about 8 recorded cases where men employed by a cemetery were involved in this behavior, meaning we're looking at roughly a 1 in 3,750 chance of this actually happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 09:56 AM
9

Ok so you did a google search on somthing messed up and got shocked at it? what does that have to do with you making up facts?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 09:43 AM
-1

Why? That's already a solid majority of men. Why would a man with fewer options be someone you're afraid of? If anything, it should be the opposite. Since he has fewer options, he's more likely to be faithful to you. Instead, you're choosing someone who has plenty of options and is more capable of leaving.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 09:36 AM
8

There's a reason they're not allowed to work in morgues, or cemeteries, too many necrophiliacs doing fucked up shit to corpses... Who told you this lie? There is literally no rule or law preventing males from working in these positions. In fact, about 60% of these jobs are occupied by men, especially in cemeteries. You're just pulling random stuff out of thin air.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 09:28 AM
2

True most women won't cause physical harm to men personally, but they will definitely find someone or some way for you to be in harms way usually intentionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:19 PM
7

Came with receipts, I applaud you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 05:25 PM
–

If they didn't then they're chances of hooking up would lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 01:47 PM
0

Right on the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 12:45 AM
1

I mean I agree with most of your points, work on self improvement and keep trying and eventually you'll land someone or at least increase the likelihood.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 12:00 AM
–

This made me audibly laugh, *please step on my balls mistress*
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 06:54 AM
1

If all else fails, it's time to go bi. Hunting for a rich man ain't just for the ladies anymore. If we men all band together and get with all the Chads and Tyrones before the ladies do, they'll have nothing left and will have no choice but to finally lower their standards. It's the perfect plan. Know your worth, fellas.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 04:54 AM
-1

I feel so talked down to reading this post; it comes off like you see men as a tool or a servant. it's hard to tell if your trying to complement men or insult them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:56 AM
3

Pretty much this, depending on the issue and what her response was, we'll never know if the advice was invalid or if the person in question was just stubborn.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:48 AM
1

I would assume you would have a general tangible idea of what would attract a women, assuming you are one, no shot at if you don't know what you want how do you expect the men to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 11:12 PM
2

Yes I understand that but I was asking for aspects that you can control, otherwise you're just saying to leave it all up to chance which is not really good advice if you're actively looking for a partner. As for sex yes casual sex happens but my point still stands, you both are still attracted to each other, if your having sex already your pretty much in relationshiop wise if you choose to pursue it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 11:09 PM
2

That's to vague and doesn't really tell me anything, do you think you can elaborate? Like what does be her type mean, that doesn't really seem like that's in the guys control on if he is or not. What can a guy add to your life that your looking for that qualifies the guy for dating. And if you you two are already having sex enough for you to know if he's good or bad at sex I would assume you two are already in a relationship. I mean there's only so many ways to realistically impress a women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 07:57 PM
1

I mean what you described is basically the average man so what you're saying is the average man is subpar. I'm actually curious with no malicious undertone what do you think men would have to do to qualify for the dating market beyond the 2 mentioned factors you already listed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 05:10 PM
-2

For me personally? Yes, but I don't see what that has to do with anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 04:08 PM
1

I don't think he means the 100% is a all the time thing but usually in the beginning stages of a new relationship I think the 100% is usually there but just naturally declines over a long period of time of being around someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 04:04 PM
-2

I mean the average male could still be willing to spend and care for them so the women could be in it for that alone even though they don't desire them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 03:51 PM
1

Why it's delusional smh, they are ones coming near me idgaf about them Literally everything you just said was delusional. Bro it's the same thing for OF and other platforms do you not see me talking about Reddit and the thing that happended with the Instagram girl? These are not rare instances smh 🤡 Rare instances of what exactly? Men trying to get female attention? Yeah no shit. Blah blah blah, search up pay pigs. Men pay money to women without women showing ANYTHING. simply because she's a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 03:33 PM
1

How...you do realize that they are paying for nudes right?... Do you know what OF girls do? You're bringing up girls who are getting paid to take there clothes off, the men are still getting what they want the relationship statues is irrelevant at that point. I was referencing women who weren't showing there buttholes on camera. And those men sending women stuff are trying to get with them by buying them out. the lack of awareness is killing me here, look you do realize when men are buying you s…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 02:54 PM
1

Again they're paying in hopes of getting attention from the girl, you really think they'd be doing that if they could get it for free? They don't expect nothing in return. It's the reason why the moment they find out you have a boyfriend all of that stops. No man's spending thousands of dollars on a women not thinking they will get something out of it. Not every man's out for sex only, a lot of men just want a relationship or attention and you said so yourself you didn't ask what they wanted you…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 02:15 PM
–

it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 10:39 AM
–

I say go dutch, no one loses anything, everyones keeping it above board. second dates I don't mind paying for if the first one works out well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 09:57 AM
–

No, verbalizing means actually saying something. Body language by itself doesn't necessarily mean anything, especially since it can be interpreted in different ways. Women's cues are often easy to mistake for simple friendliness, which is why many men are hesitant to assume romantic interest. In many cases, a man isn't outright rejecting you. Your signals may not be as clear as you think they are, or he may be deliberately avoiding assumptions because he doesn't want to misread the situation and…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 09:40 AM
2

me either
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 07:04 AM
–

Just because someone didn't buy you food they're not compatible? and your saying that's not entitled? no mam, *he* dodged a bullet. *and can't even treat women as good as they treat themselves?* Have you seen how men treat themselves? Trust me, on average they’re not living a life of luxury—they tend to live fairly simple lives and often put in more effort for a date than they would for themselves. you keep bringing up your vagina as the only thing of worth when going into a date, so don't be su…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 07:00 AM
–

Are you talking about before or after the date? How did you come to that conclusion without getting to know them first? You’re making a large assumption based on someone wanting to go Dutch on the first date. If this is your initial reaction to not getting a free meal, then yeah, they dodged a bullet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 06:07 AM
2

well depending on the people and the mood it can definitly happen, people do have sex on the first date it's nothing new.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 05:37 AM
0

becuase were talking about the *first* date not indefintly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 05:32 AM
-1

yes thats kind of the end goal of a relationship, to pro-create.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 05:27 AM
2

No they want it, they just don't expect it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 05:20 AM
1

I find that really hard to believe, based on your previous responses. It feels like you're treating money as if it grows on trees and prioritising fun on the man’s dime.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 05:12 AM
2

Well I do believe abusive men are avoidable and I already explained my reasoning on the matter so there's not much else i can say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 05:03 AM
1

you just said you didn't want to debate divorce, but you keep circling back to it...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 04:55 AM
1

you brought it up though....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 04:53 AM
0

I didn’t mention abusive men, that was a previous commentor. your responding to the wrong person. "as to your second point, why would i divorce my husband just to take half his money if i could stay with him and have access to almost all of it?" That depends on the situation. If a marriage is going well and both a man and a woman are happy, they’ll usually stay together. But if it isn’t working anymore and they don’t like each other, then one or both people may try to secure the best financial o…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 04:45 AM
0

Not really—it’s not much of a free choice in practice if someone is trying to find a partner. If a man had the option to go on dates without paying, most would probably choose that anyway. But it’s not even just about money. The real issue is that nobody wants to feel used by the end of the night. Men don’t want to spend a bunch of money on someone who wasn’t really interested in them to begin with. From personal experience, I once went on a date with a girl who kept pushing for more and more ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 04:26 AM
4

No, I disagree. If you're giving someone an ultimatum of, "Pay for my date or you don't get to see me," that is a form of entitlement. If women don't want men feeling entitled to sex because they paid for a date, then men don't want women feeling entitled to a free meal simply because they agreed to show up. The same principle applies: neither person should expect something from the other just because they're participating in the date.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 04:13 AM
1

I'm sure they would if they could. The court system is heavily skewed, and realistically, if someone has the opportunity to walk away with half of their ex's assets, why wouldn't they take it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 04:07 AM
1

you got a good point there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:56 AM
3

"if women never invite you to go on a date then clearly they don’t want to date you that badly." I think women often do want to date you; they just want you to make the first move. Obviously that's not always the case, but more often than not, some women will be more subtle about showing interest. Instead of approaching directly, they'll do little things to get your attention or encourage you to approach them. I hope that makes sense. My point is that a lack of direct pursuit doesn't necessarily…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:47 AM
5

If your goal was to change the world and it didn't, then yes you failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:39 AM
8

I feel like splitting the bill on the first date is the best approach. It helps ensure that both people are there because they're genuinely interested in getting to know each other, rather than because one person wants a free meal or whatever activity was planned. After the first date, though, I'd be much more comfortable with the guy paying. By that point, you've both shown enough interest to continue seeing each other, so it feels less transactional and more like a genuine gesture.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:36 AM
12

I don't think that's true. If men simply waited around for women to pursue them, humanity probably would've gone extinct a long time ago. Like it or not, men are generally expected to be the pursuers in dating. Women rarely take on that role unless the guy is exceptionally attractive, high-status, famous, or otherwise stands out from the crowd. Most relationships start because a man made the first move. I don't necessarily like that dynamic, but it is what it is. So comparing men pursuing women …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:31 AM
1

it's easy not to give a shit when it's not your money being spent, if that's really your views on money then go on a expensive date on your dime and see if you have the same level of enjoyment by the end of it when you can't pay rent next month.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:13 AM
1

because you're not interested in him, you're interested in what he provides and if that's not the case, are you going to be paying for this trip or is it all going to be on his dime?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:02 AM
1

and your not entitled to a mans money, get a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 02:37 AM
1

they do that becuase they expect to win her affection in doing so, they don't enjoy the act of spending money for the sake of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 02:35 AM
1

this is out of my realm of conversation, I did not mean for people to go on a conspiracy theory tangent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 02:30 AM
0

....I'm sorry i asked, didn't know you were going to go tin foil hat on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 02:28 AM
1

I never said anything about algorithms, feeding the algorithms what? No judgment here dude, I just want to better understand what you're points are. I'm not trying to be malicious im probably just dense
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 08:47 PM
1

What's the point you're trying to make? People criticize and speak negatively about these corporations on their own platforms every day. You don't have to look far on YouTube or any major social media site to find countless people calling them out or expressing negative opinions about them. Just because you're using the platform "a tool" doesn't mean you agree with the people who own it. Your on reddit, does that mean you agree with what ever the owner feeds you?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 08:31 PM
1

Yeah, you just gave a terrible example. You're conflating what big corporations and influencers are trying to sell you with what people are actually saying. Corporations are the ones saying those things are good, that they're the future, etc., because they're trying to sell them to you. The general public, on the other hand, often disagrees. And the disagreement is what's widespread online. By using that example, you're actually showing that you agree with what the majority of people are saying …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 07:08 PM
0

Good point
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:06 PM
-1

To be fair, seeing something become widespread online is probably better than relying purely on anecdotal experiences, since those can vary greatly from person to person. When you see many women from different backgrounds and walks of life publicly expressing standards that seem unreasonably high, it becomes harder to argue that the perception is coming solely from your own social circle or personal experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 05:59 PM
3

Ok c'mon now, I think what ops is saying is 100 percent wrong but trump literally is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, he has money, wealth, and statues, his personality is irrelevant when you have that much clout! of course he's going to get mad pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 01:26 AM
2

This is kind of broad, I'd say the life of a average male is pretty difficult because you're kind of thrown into the deep end with no external safety net. Of course this isn't true for every male but it's kind of just the way things are so for most males.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 11:36 PM
2

well that begs the question of how much your life is worth? The military already provides a bunch of benefits I don't think increased pay would be a good idea for tax payers because that moneys got to come from some were.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 04:59 AM
1

Don't know why your getting down voted, it really had nothing to do with ops point
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 11:47 PM
1

Honestly the way women flirt is to subtle to tell any difference, you can't tell if there just being nice or if they're into you. It's easy to mistake one for the other so most men just play it safe and assume they have no romantic interest in them rather than face any potential backlash.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 12:48 AM
2

That sounds awesome actually. I would love to get those
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 11:49 PM
1

I never said anything about me?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:03 PM
1

Again, those aren’t really streamers—they’re YouTubers. Their income isn’t primarily based on streaming; it mostly comes from YouTube and other types of content, with streaming being something they only do occasionally. Calling them top streamers is like saying The Rock is a top earner in streaming, even though most of his income and audience come from outside that space. The only person on that list who actually built their audience through streaming from the start is Kai.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 01:46 AM
1

These aren’t even streamers—they’re YouTubers. And half of this list is women; it doesn’t even include streamers like Pokimane or Hasan, or anyone who actually streams on Twitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:35 AM
1

The streamers getting the most gifts and money are females, the ones with face filters and knee socks, trying to look as cute as possible; they aren't entertaining or saying anything of interest, they just look pretty and play video games poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:14 AM
1

How can you have found a partner if no one's flirting with you? Unless you're the one approaching, you're not getting anybody. You understand that, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:05 AM
2

They're saying that there are a bunch of different metrics that are never addressed, even if you had the full list were you even planning to address any of them or just look at it and say. *Is that all?*
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:39 AM
1

So we're just going to act like hypergamy doesn't exist? If you want evidence, just look at all of human history and evolution: high-status men typically had more than one woman, and some even maintained harems. No average man was landing a harem of women. This has always been a thing in nature. Where do you think the term "alpha male" came from? But nothing empirically derived supports that statement. May I present you with the infamous Okcupid study from 2009 .
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:37 PM
1

But 100% of women are going for 20% of men, you see the point being made here? or are just going to continue being willfully obtuse obtuse about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:39 PM
4

by that logic, a over weight balding broke fat guy is on the same level as a rich 6 foot ripped dude. It's only subjective if you want to feel better about yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:34 PM
0

so men of high status in wealth and looks don't normally get a lot of women with little effort? and those men with high status aren't in the top 20%? I'm sorry but what exactly isn't true again?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 04:32 PM
1

yeah that's true, you have a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 04:08 PM
9

that's true, can't beat supply and demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 03:52 PM
6

same with most women but they sure act like they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 03:37 PM
1

Do you think making your man uncomfortable would have saved your marriage? I'm pretty sure that if he were comfortable with you, he would have been more open about his issues in the relationship. The story you're telling feels very fabricated and seems like a huge misreading of your relationship. If your huge take away from this was *I need to make my partner feel uncomfortable then I don't think your ready for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 02:03 PM
2

Women CHOOSE those men who act poorly. How fucking dense are you? If a woman has 100 Men to choose from and PICKS the worst 2 and the ONLY 2 of that 100 who will act that way.. Because they act that way. How is that mens fault when being Good behaving men was the literal reason they were not chosen? must be hard for women to choose between chad and tyrone.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 01:44 PM
2

Let me elaborate: by "duty," I mean the commitment to uphold the promises made during marriage, even when it’s neither convenient nor enjoyable. It’s about prioritizing the relationship and its responsibilities over fleeting emotions, which is essential for a long-lasting marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 01:34 PM
2

Duty
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:03 AM
2

I mean he's basically saying a longer version of everything every other male on this post has been saying all along.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:36 AM
1

true
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:33 AM
2

and it's usually 9/10 times women usually only sacrifice themselves when it's for something that only benefits themselves/women specifically and not people in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:38 AM
3

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:23 AM
2

No one said marrage was going to be easy, it requires sacrifice even if that includes your happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:47 AM
1

yes, dating is a pain in the ass for most regular men, it's why we marry train wreck wives because after a while you just take what you can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:42 AM
0

But yeah it’s pretty weak to feel victimized by some women on the internet talking about being afraid of being alone with a strange man in the middle of nowhere. You know, being afraid of what every father in this world is also afraid of happening to his daughter. you have to realize the phrasing of the question is ridiculous right? the question wasn't *would u like be in the woods with a strange man* it was would you rather be in the woods with a man or a bear. they never described the man as b…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:29 AM
1

when it comes to marriages for most men you can't just up and leave without there being huge consequences attached to it, if there are kids involved that becomes a factor and even if there aren't any children involved then finances are also a huge factor as well so the logical choice is just to stay in the relationship and try to work it out, especially if you've already been with the person for a long period of time and at that point trying to get into the dating game again would be a huge hass…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:06 AM
–

No, I don't see that. Dogs can maim or kill me too, but I still love them. Recognizing a potential threat has nothing to do with moral judgement. people typically don't refer to something that maims or kills someone in a positive light. Women can't generally impregnate themselves. you take pregnancy as the equivalent of semen maiming a women. something that has been done since the dawn of time with no issue... and, you don't find that concerning?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 06:22 PM
–

Except OP asked for feedback on his situation and reasoning. You can give feedback without mocking someone, calling someone scared or selfish doesn't add to the conversation or give better insight into decision making, it's just gaslighting someone towards your moral belief. while falsely claiming that vasectomies have no risks I'm going based off of response I saw claiming that in this thread somewhere, I don't know were it is and I'm to lazy to look for it. One option is significantly better. …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 06:10 PM
–

I never called it vile or poison- those are moral claims. I don't think semen is immoral. It's a necessary part of reproduction. And the reproduction process can kill or maim women. You see when you frame it as *semen can kill or *maim* women* I don't think I'm to far fetched in thinking that you don't hold the male genitalia in the most positive light... I have never heard of a women being maimed by semen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 05:49 PM
–

What you just described isn’t about reproductive rights; it’s just general prevention of reproduction. We are talking about what happens after a baby has been conceived and the amount of say the father has in that situation, which you just answered with none. As a male, I am still being controlled either way because I have no say in what happens to the life I helped create, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, but I still have to deal with the consequences of decisions being made by the mother.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 05:25 PM
–

you keep describing male semen as a "dangerous, toxic substance that's vile and poisonous to women" rather than as something that's simply a natural part of human biology and its truly concerning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 04:47 PM
–

that isn't always the case, and the longer you wait the less chance you'll have of being able to reverse it, so when you actually would like a child your permanently sterile.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 04:21 PM
–

Telling someone they are a (insert negative label) for not doing something is still a form of coercion, even if it gives the illusion of choice. For example, presenting a list of side effects for the pill while falsely claiming that vasectomies have no risks is a biased tactic. This approach manipulates the decision-making process by framing one option as significantly better, pressuring the person to choose based on incomplete or misleading information rather than an objective comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 04:17 PM
–

then tell me, in what context does "kill all men" sound justifiable, if men had a movement slogan called *rape all women* would anybody see that as acceptable in any way shape or form? hell even the saying of a group of men saying *kill all women* would be hard to justify. to say that this has nothing to do with gender is absurd because rather we acknowledge it or not there is bias towards whats being said from a certain sex to were context doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 03:58 PM
–

men don't have a say in what happens to their own offspring, it's solely up to the mother and she can put on child support afterwards. If you want to argue what reproductive rights men don't have you can answer your own question by naming what reproductive rights they DO have during and after the pregnancy has occured.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 03:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter