TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RoyalKai Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by RoyalKai on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Hey man... a little extra skin goes a long way!
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:13 AM
0

I promise you, that didn't mess with your sex life. Also, quality response. I can kinda see why your sex life isn't that great...
/r/MensRights28/08/16 04:31 AM
-5

I'm with you guys on almost all accounts... But this is one that makes you all sound retarded. "MGM" isn't that bad... Circumcision isn't as bad as you're making it sound. My advice, stick to the issues you guys actually SHOULD be paying attention to.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 02:58 AM
-6

Straw man arguments all over that video... Must be why he's an atheist.. Not a good video
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:41 PM
1

It can slow down. Which you, me, and everyone should encourage. As well as encourage people to grow thicker skin. Should we not?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:34 PM
0

It's not delusional to try and diminish it. And to downvote it when people make those comments. What is delusional is to think I was trying to say get rid of it completely... Right? You should have noticed that yourself without me having to point it out. I'm not talking about control. I'm talking about influencing people. (which is what John Oliver was trying to do) He was just talking to only have the problem... and therefore missed the point.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:33 PM
1

You can influence. Very easily I might add... in fact, that's exactly what John Oliver is trying to do. Influence people to have thicker skin He should have, as well as yourself, tried to influence people to grow-up in how they treat other human beings. If you only focus on one side of the issue... you'll have a skewed view of the subject. I suggest you reconsider.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:31 PM
-3

That's only have the story. The other half is that people shouldn't be saying those things. It's not either/or. It's both. Both sides need to grow up
/r/MensRights23/06/15 10:02 AM
2

It's not pity, it's love. Their lives are significantly better because of their religion and they want to share those benefits with everyone. It's a terrible analogy to compare feminism with Christian worldviews
/r/MensRights22/12/14 09:12 AM
1

um... What kind of women have you been hanging around?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:21 AM
1

"people being attacked for their beliefs" So you're admitting that people are getting attacked for their beliefs by people in government, but since the laws are in their favor it's not correct to say that the government is attacking them? I can see where you're coming from on that. When I was saying the government, I was referring to the people. Seems like you were talking about the laws themselves. Third trimester There is unique human DNA at conception though. It's clearly and scientifically p…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:52 PM
1

5 examples That they had to go to court means they were being attacked. That they won means they were being attacked unjustifiably. You can't deny that. Mandates Murder is the premeditated killing of one human being by another. Life begins at conception because that is when a separate, unique, living human being exists. Plan B kills human beings. That's not religious, that's fact. The mandates that were being lobbied is that religious institutions had to provide plan B to their employees. Check …
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:23 AM
1

I gave you 5 examples of people actually using the government to infringe on others' religious rights. Why are you narrowing it to a lobby? Even still, what about the contraception mandates? Many people were trying to get the government to force companies to provide that to their employees even though they considered that murdering unborn babies. Or in education, many examples of people being ostracized because of their faith. Ben Stein even did a documentary on it called Expelled. Or in the med…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:54 AM
1

A public school is a government position. A police officer is a government position. The other examples were examples of people having to go to court to defend their religion. I'm throwing my hands in the air as I type this. I don't get how you can't see that's literally government dealing with issues that they shouldn't be. Just admit that there are people out there that attack Christians because of their beliefs! I think the motivation on the left to attack Christianity is because it is the st…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:50 PM
1

Of course you disagree... you're one of the people I'm talking about. (That's what I've been saying this whole time) But I'm confused by your responses to the five things I listed... How is having to go to court to defend yourself not being attacked? Also, I want you to go and find me an example of what I've been talking about. It has at least happened once, right? Find me a good example, this should be interesting...
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:34 PM
1

I don't care about your feelings. I don't care that you think leftists are meanies just because they can outargue you. You're still proving my point. You don't consider things from other people's point of view. It's your way or the highway. (That's bigotry) You failed to successfully argue that anyone is. It happens all the time. You know how when something is so common it's kind of hard to get a specific example off the top of your head? I have a ton of personal experience but if you want proof…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:20 AM
1

You're still doing it. It's not just words. It's a dismissal. You write off what I am saying because you have a difference experience. Well that's lovely, but just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I've made claims, I've linked videos, I've cited both you and Chocoboat, and I've been giving my opinions on the matter. And again, you are currently doing what I'm talking about. This has nothing to do with homosexuality. That's just an example you asked for so we could talk …
/r/MensRights15/06/14 06:27 AM
1

Gees. Case in point. You, sir, are my example. I'm not talking about teh gayz... I'm talking about the aggressive dismissal of the inappropriate nature of how people like you talk to people like me. When I bring it up to people on the left, I get responses like this. Treat other people with more respect. And pay attention to what they are talking about. It's important.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:21 AM
1

AlongAustower was talking about the hypocritical nature of 'the left' calling conservatives bigots. Chocoboat tried to deny it, and I called him on it. You shouldn't deny and dismiss these things. the bigotry and hypocritical nature of their accusations lately is wildly inappropriate. This last decade has been awful. Then you chime in and did exactly what I was claiming. That people dismiss these awful people instead of criticizing them. It's not ok. Sorry for the short responses since then, I w…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:00 AM
1

You don't get it.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 12:03 AM
1

Gay people don't froth at the mouth at your suggestions I believe you're saying this because you want to believe it, not because it is actually true.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:19 PM
1

For the latter, yes they are. For the former, it shouldn't even be a thing. Civil unions were already in place. No one was being oppressed. But they wanted state recognition of a religious sacrament. And it has been causing problems. I'm for basic human rights, for anyone. But I'm very against Gay Marriage. And that pisses a lot of people off. Try this: Try suggesting that everyone get civil unions (gay, straight, or whatever) and then if you want a religious wedding, find a church that will mar…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:30 PM
0

Marriage is the big one at the moment.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:25 PM
1

I have this theory that they are not actually for the oppressed. Just against those who they deem have the power/are the status quo.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:00 PM
0

You want names? I don't understand what you're asking
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:00 PM
1

Work on that. It's important and will help you a lot in the future
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:10 PM
1

I couldn't disagree more. Perhaps you're having a hard time seeing issues through their eyes?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:36 AM
2

HOLD UP. this is exactly the kind of nonsense I was referring to. When that guy said those things about rape, conservatives criticized him. On the other hand, liberals everywhere were getting behind the banner that conservatives are racist. Here is one montage I found, but the worst offenders were people I had conversations with. It was rampant and does not compare to anything conservatives have done. I don't mean to come off too strong, just be careful with your false moral equivalences please.…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:08 AM
1

You want more government control over the economy? Or do you just identify as being 'left'?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:17 AM
-3

Saying the political left is all like that The vast majority of them were. Especially the ones speaking out. That nonsense was all over the place. It still is. I am still being called sexist, racist, etc. freedom of religion and government's non-endorsement of a particular religion We have that already. The people AlongAustower was referring to are trying to get government to tread in matters of the church.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:14 AM
1

Conservatives are for personal responsibility.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:11 AM
1

I don't think it's a left vs right issue. I think it falls along a different set of lines. Perhaps the Individualistic vs Collective spectrum Or perhaps the Equalism vs Oppressed spectrum
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:10 AM
1

I've actually been trying to get to the bottom of this for awhile now. Turns out we've all been talking about two different things. The real meaning of racism is to think or act against another person because of their race. Sexism is the same because of their sex. But that's not what the "OMG dat's racist/sexist/homophobic/islamaphobic/anti-whatever" crowd is referring to. What they are really getting at is the majority vs the minority. But even that goes a little bit deeper because its not pure…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 12:15 AM
14

Good call. That's definitely hypocrisy. Honestly, I barely commented here because I care more about my 15 seconds than I do about this Jezebel site. But thanks for letting me know.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:16 PM
1

Seems like the site is just allowing different people to voice different opinions... I don't see any hypocrisy here. I disagree with both articles actually. But if its two different people, let them both be heard. Edit: Apparently they were by the same person. That is definitely hypocrisy. And to be honest, really gross. People like that make me shutter.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:11 PM
-56

It's not hypocrisy if those articles were written by two different people.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:42 PM
-2

it's k. The numbers don't really bother me... I just add the ups and the downs together to see at least how many people noticed it haha I have other accounts that I post to /r/aww and r/gonewild... Plenty of karma to be made over there. Subs like this one I care more about bouncing ideas off of each other than the numbers in the corner. Take care.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:32 AM
5

I was referring to the title of this post. "Because male privilege, right?" Because indicates that the following is a cause of what had happened/had been stated. This is not a cause, it is a correlation. And as a statistician, that confusion bothers me. Kinda like nails on a chalk board, you know?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:24 AM
3

That you have to account for likelihood vs pure statistics should be an obvious indicator that this is a correlation not the cause of the issue at hand. That's statistical analysis 101. Being a man does not make it more likely that you will go to jail. Breaking the law makes it more likely. And men break the law WAY more than women do (on serious offenses) There is no way statistics could show that BECAUSE they are men, they have a higher likelihood of imprisonment. These types of arguments will…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:14 AM
2

I like this sub and I really agree with a lot that is said. That's why bad arguments are dangerous... they detract from the truth behind these serious issues. This is a correlation not a causation. People will focus on that and not the real causes that lead to this disparity.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:09 AM
1

This is because men commit more crimes. Stop making bad arguments please
/r/MensRights21/12/13 02:27 AM
5

I don't think that's an accurate accusation of their thought process. I think they consider this a human rights violation. Consider (to take this to an extreme... since they are extremists) that these weren't magazines but actual people. Would you then care if the person merchant couldn't afford rent if you came and rescued all the people from being abused? Of course not. That is more similar to how they justify these actions than the notion of victimization. And that should be the focus of your…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:38 PM
19

Anyone who supported him because he is black is just as bad as people who didn't vote for him because he is black.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 08:58 PM
1

All people like things that benefit them and don't like things that hurt them. This isn't anything new.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 08:30 AM
3

Anyone has a right to make a claim about any ideology. Regardless of whether they subscribe to that ideology themselves. If you disagree with Watterson, that's okay.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:21 AM
2

Who cares You don't need to have lived through it in order to teach it. There are many ways to inspire people. Personal testimony is only one of those ways.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:06 AM
0

I can't say it enough... the number that this is happening is not an important factor in this discussion. That it is happening at all is what is important.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:06 AM
0

2.2 mil sex workers. (including minors) 64.8 mil population (including minors) 3.4% of total population is a prostitute. Now, I am assuming for the sake of this discussion that half of them want to get married. (in reality, I'd say more like 80-95% want to get married. Since that is why they do this work in the first place.) But if it is half then 1.7% of the total population is actively trying to marry a foreigner by renting out their bodies and desperately trying to entertain these customers. …
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:19 PM
0

I don't think it's really a topic worth discussing. Again, no worries. Not a big deal if you are uninterested in this subject.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:05 PM
0

I could, but I think it'll do you more harm than good. Again, you are relying too much on numbers and not enough on the heart of the topic. This is a problem. It would be better for you to just listen to people talking about common sights they have seen. Don't worry whether it represents a 1.3% of the total population or not. Focus more on why those things are being said. Because that is the more important relationship between two trains of thought.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:39 PM
0

Sigh... http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/eap/119058.htm http://www.nationmultimedia.com/search/read.php?newsid=91309 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9720644 http://htc.anu.edu.au/pdfs/Knodel1.pdf http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11205-009-9568-9
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:49 AM
0

When things are sooo common. They are considered common knowledge. This is one of those issues. You care too much about percentages and not enough about social movement and flow. It doesn't matter what percent of the total population is doing this. What matters is that it is happening and lately it is happening a whole lot more.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:19 AM
0

Does it matter? Who cares about an exact number. You see it all the time out here especially in specific regions like Pattaya and Patong. The streets are lined with prostitutes desperately looking for a husband to pay for them and their family. And plenty of Farangs (foreigners) come every day looking for the hottest and most outgoing ones. I don't care about any case study nonsense. I'm telling you it is very very common. Every night thousands show up looking for sex, marriage, and love (in tha…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:30 AM
0

You doubt me that I've seen many Europeans coming to Thailand to look for wives over the last many years? ok, no problem. Not a big deal.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:09 AM
0

Personal testimony is a source of evidence. In fact, witnesses are the most common form of evidence used in courts! The fact that I have seen it, and you have no reason to doubt me, is (and should be) persuasive.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 06:19 AM
2

I've been living in Thailand for awhile. There are a lot of Europeans out here looking for wives. Can't say I blame them if this Swedish example is close to the norm. There are a lot of Thai ladies looking for European husbands though... so its (almost) a good thing.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:57 PM
8

I've been living in Thailand for awhile. There are a lot of Europeans out here looking for wives. Can't say I blame them if this Swedish example is close to the norm. There are a lot of Thai ladies looking for European husbands though... so its (almost) a good thing.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter