TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RsonW Archive

View 1 post and 140 comments by RsonW on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

RsonW/r/MensRights05/12/11 06:21 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

YMCA is still men-only, isn't it?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 11:36 PM
6

Did you respond after only reading the first paragraph? Because I think I laid out the reasons pretty well.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 07:55 AM
4

Figures.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 07:04 AM
5

I was going to say something similar. If one lives in an area with almost solely white couples, it can be very difficult for them to see the white features in half-white persons. Once one lives in an area with a lot of mixed-race couples, it becomes very obvious when someone's half-white.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:18 PM
5

Same.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 10:06 PM
8

Same difference
/r/MensRights31/01/12 10:02 PM
14

I love when someone tries to get me to do something by saying, "I know what a man would do." I say, "Stand for his convictions?"
/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:42 PM
34

Ah, but that is the very nature of privilege. A system (in this case, an employer) giving an unrequested benefit to a person due to an inherent property of their existence.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 03:32 PM
8

This. I see single moms every day with new outfits and fancy phones while their kids are in rags. Ivory Tower feminists want to pretend it never happens but it does.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 08:21 PM
6

Most FGM doesn't include clitorectomy.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:16 PM
6

Never say never. I know male rape victims.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 08:32 PM
0

The point's that way---> You seem to have missed it.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 02:20 PM
0

Leftism as it's understood outside America, sure. I consider myself a Bull Moose Progressive.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 04:46 AM
14

Ah, SRS. At this point, I realize my post will almost surely be buried, but I've been thinking about those shiftless tools for a while now. The problem with SRS is that it's full of women who have been told essentially their entire lives that they are oppressed but haven't actually been. So instead of seeking to aid real victims of oppression, they come to a website, misconstrue statements (for the vast part) intended as humor, and claim that these are evidence of their oppression. Rather than e…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 01:34 AM
0

Ignore them, [and] their idiots Get it?
/r/MensRights14/12/11 11:54 PM
2

This is true, I always upvote a feminist who makes a good counterpoint. Sadly, many trolls interpret "mindless misandry" as a "counterpoint", then accuse us of "silencing their views"
/r/MensRights13/12/11 09:34 PM
1

a.k.a. likely non-white Most poor people are white
/r/MensRights13/12/11 09:13 PM
7

No, the district attorney has to change the charges. Nothing's automatic. Why? Is it first-degree murder or second-degree murder? Or is it manslaughter? Also, "alleged" is the presumption of innocence. You're not a murderer until a jury of your peers finds you guilty of murder.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 06:40 AM
9

Because presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 04:37 AM
2

Black people are so thoroughly and constantly fucked by our legal system, I was seeing it as legal advice too. Relevant Dave Chappelle bit
/r/MensRights07/12/11 05:45 AM
4

No, you're right. I just think it's a worthless contribution, not that it's against the rules.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 06:38 PM
2

My reaction to every single part of this video. "We do this for cosmetic reasons <laundry list of complications>" Why? <The whole process, calmly narrated> WHY?x24
/r/MensRights05/12/11 08:47 AM
8

Well, one day (in 2008), I brought up the fact that a woman could get an abortion and/or leave her child at a safehouse but that a man has no equivalent. This started a discussion about that and my friend (a lesbian) mentioned the MRA movement and that that was one of their many issues. Almost all of the members of the club (including the advisor, a female Sociology professor) agreed that the inability of a man to abandon rights and responsibilities to his offspring while a woman retains that ab…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 05:32 AM
5

Yup. I came to know about MRA through my community college's Feminism Club.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 04:56 AM
13

Get the fuck out. Misogyny != Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 04:45 AM
-3

Oh, for fuck's sake. MensRights is supposed to be about legitimate issues, not fucking Rage Comics.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 04:38 AM
2

Take care of your fucking kids first. Buy yourself whatever the hell you want, but not if your kids aren't getting enough to eat, don't have school supplies, and are wearing dirty tattered clothes. Are you really such a dumbass that you don't understand this concept?
/r/MensRights27/11/11 01:36 PM
2

No. No, I did not. First off, I live in a community property state, so if a wealthy couple divorced, everything would be split 50-50 (barring prenup) and in such a situation, it would be rare for child support to be awarded. It's just not a situation that a wealthy mother would be put into in my state. Secondly, and most importantly, this is only one way in which a parent can be bad. I've known rich people whose parents beat them black and blue when they were kids. Of course, CPS never got invol…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 10:30 PM
3

Uh-huh. Except what you're forgetting is that I actually did grow up poor, the vast majority of people on welfare are embarrassed by it, budget their money and get off of it. I'm not rallying against welfare, I'm pointing out that some people DO abuse it, they have more kids to get bigger checks (single moms or couples, it happens with both), they sell drugs (not reported as income), they take the money that's supposed to be used for feeding their children and spend it on themselves. It's not a …
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:43 PM
3

Neat. Tell me more about how my personal experiences are incorrect because they don't mesh with your belief structure. Fuck, you have honestly never lived amongst us poor, have you? All too often, you see women (and men) with iPhones, souped-up cars/trucks, and expensive clothes while their kids are in dirty rags and look like they haven't eaten anything but ramen for the past year. Step out of your ivory tower and see what the real world is like, you wealthy, elitist, jackass.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:24 PM
0

Except we do. You probably do too unless you've lived in an upper-middle class or higher environment your whole life. This is extremely common in lower-middle class and below. But hey, you can see everything from your ivory tower, can't you?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 05:45 PM
2

You two need see other people. Cool. Troll on in the future, kiddo.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:27 AM
3

Well, I'm uncut and don't see any particular benefit to lube/moisturizers/etc.. I can't speak for my friend other than he's always said that me not needing lube to masturbate makes him jealous that he's not intact. If you are objective humans are always looking for something to be wrong. tens seconds on the web and someone is offering you a way to get :Harder,longer,thicker. Then add all this back and forth about cut and uncut on top of that.........so If your friend is being honest about this? …
/r/MensRights20/11/11 04:31 AM
2

That's why I said "really?" I don't discuss such things with other people, but what I've seen on the internet and what I've heard from the only guy I've talked with this about, lube is a downright necessity if you're circumcised. This would be the first time I've heard anything to the contrary. I'm almost expecting a "well, it doesn't feel nearly as good and is a little painful, but with the right angle, it is posible" based on my previous sixteen years of internet browsing.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 03:37 AM
1

Wat? You were the one making the claim, you provide the evidence. That... that's just how discussion works. So what are the studies that show that circumcision results in an increase of sexual function?
/r/MensRights20/11/11 12:57 AM
4

Not really. It retracts easily during sex, so it's not phimosis, I just have an especially long foreskin, I guess. Aaaaaaaand now I'm discussing my penis on Reddit. Might as well submit a pic to r/gonewild now...
/r/MensRights20/11/11 12:08 AM
3

crickets
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:59 PM
6

It starts to hurt if you go too long.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:57 PM
7

As an intact American, I can tell you there's a tradeoff. I've had partners wary to or refuse to give me oral because it looks weird to them. But every girl for whom I've been their first intact lover has told me I was the best they'd had at vaginal because of how my foreskin feels.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:56 PM
13

Don't circumcised men have higher rates of erectile dysfunction? If so, there's that.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:50 PM
7

Really? My best friend is cut and I'm intact. He always says he needs lube and I always say I don't. He says that's the biggest reason he wishes his parents didn't circumcise him. Unless you're trying to make cut guys feel bad. In which case, you're doing it wrong.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:45 PM
10

No, not even. Promiscuity being seen as a moral issue is the problem. Being promiscuous is neither moral nor immoral, it simply is. I disagree with this image, not from a Men's Rights standpoint, but from a sexual liberation standpoint. You and me, baby, we ain't nothin' but mammals So let's do it like they do on the Discovery Channel --Late 20th Century poets, The Bloodhound Gang
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:32 PM
1

Seeing as that's Anton LaVay, the single quotes probably indicate he was acting out a rape fantasy.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:28 PM
16

I was supporting this article until this: Public schools, which are famously run by women and designed to give women an advantage, encourage young women to have sex. They do this by demonstrating usage of condoms, and explanatory videos (when I was in high school I saw at least one video that graphically depicted an ejaculating penis inside a vagina). An implicit assumption exists: Girls have free reign over their bodies, and they express this through sex. The very idea of "sex education" affirm…
/r/MensRights18/11/11 04:25 AM
2

Yee-yup. The times I've been with Cougars, that's how it's gone down. An older woman will blow your mind. If I'm attracted to her, she's aged well; when I see older men with younger women, I usually see it's the same.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 04:05 AM
2

Oh, I don't know if you being facetious with "Why don't older women chase after younger men". They do. Oh my, how they do. Given your post history, I didn't know if you were being serious with that comment (though I'm like 40% sure you're not).
/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:49 AM
2

They do, they're called Cougars. I deal with them often. I realize this may be a "whoosh" since rantgrrl is the one posting, but whatever.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:32 AM
4

Oh, and boobs. Girls in their 20's have killer boobs. As a man in his 20s, I can confirm this.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:30 AM
1

Protip: rantgrrl is one of r/MR's most adamant supporters. She is especially skilled at dismantling "feminist" (read: female-supremecist) arguments.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:21 AM
15

To be fair, the BBB is shit. But still, I have no reason to believe this firm isn't legit.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:12 AM
2

I may have a question later, but for now I think it's interesting that you're doing this AMA because after reading your comments last night, I was going to ask you to do this today.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 09:59 PM
1

Meh, I meant it's mostly a few out-there "feminists", but there's not a society-wide moral outcry.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 04:14 AM
4

It sure is! Wait, I don't speak German. EDIT: I missed it the first time. She looks into the dude's swim…briefs (I don't know what you call European swimwear, but those sure aren't trunks), I think I heard her say, "klein", which I think means "small", then pushes him into the pool. I don't see how this is a "double standard" issue. There are plenty of ads in which the male lead passes over a less-desirable female for a more-desirable one. The "outrage" expressed over these is almost non-existen…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 03:34 AM
1

I'm not sure why you point out that they're mostly gay and transgendered… or even if that's true. But otherwise, that's a fair assessment of those pendejos.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 02:38 AM
0

Don't even post there, man. They're like fundie Christians. They have a set viewpoint and a place wherein their inane belief structures are heralded as the best thing possible. You'll pull your hair out from the mental acrobatics and illogic there.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 02:17 AM
2

sigh I'll grab the pitchforks…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 01:55 AM
1

Yee-yup. Remember lads (and lasses), feminism isn't the enemy, it's female supremacists calling themselves "feminists" that fuck everything up for both our causes. We MRAs need feminists and feminists need MRAs.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 01:37 AM
-1

Spot on, man. It's society as a whole that oppresses both men and women. You have to deal with each issue as an individual issue. If a part of society does not afford fair play to both sexes, which is the one being oppressed? Address that. Feminism and Mens Rights are the two halves of the same pie.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:31 AM
0

Alienating us won't steel our resolve. You sure have that right. I pity to think if you're a man. If you're a woman, I hate to realize humans like yourself exist.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:26 AM
6

This will probably get buried at this point, but whatever. My personal story with Mens Rights Activism is that I was a member of the Feminist Club at my college 3 years ago. I was talking with a lesbian member and eventually the conversation turned to the problems men have in society. Our conversation went like this: She: "Oh, you're sounding like you'd support MRA" Me: "MRA?" "Men's Rights Activism. They're all about men getting equal opportunity to raise children, ending false rape claims, and…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 11:42 PM
5

You should realize that literally zero people here are defending men who abuse women nor are they saying that this ad campaign should only mention women abusing men. They're just saying the ads should mention women who abuse men because there is so little awareness of it. You yourself are proof of this when you say "the vast majority of abusive relationships are with the man controlling" despite evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:46 PM
1

From what I've seen, they're supportive of our causes. I don't think that many would call themselves Men's Rights Activists per se.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 06:32 PM
1

even there 2XC is largely in favor of MRA
/r/MensRights20/10/11 05:58 PM
2

And he would probably not be downvoted if he hadn't said "reversible vasectomy".
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:53 AM
3

You mean clothing AND secondary sex characteristics. What percentage of women are XX women and what percentage of women are XY? How the actual fuck would it not be unexpected to see a woman with a scrotum?
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:26 AM
1

I heard The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was going to foot the bill for FDA testing
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:11 AM
8

Because he's not dead-on. Vasectomy is not easily reversible.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:08 AM
1

As for number two, that's State sovereignty for you.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:39 AM
3

That's what baffles me about today's so-called feminists. "No, you see, it's because the patriarchy that women are seen as weak and shouldn't be expected to fight!" Really? So in modern society, you honestly think that violence is a positive attribute for anyone?
/r/MensRights13/09/11 03:35 AM
1

Are we talking about all rapes in all or just (the rare) random street rape? Or all rapes? Which scenario are we trying to play out? People in nursing homes get robbed by staff all the time too. It's obviously not because they dress well enough to appear wealthy. Come to think of it, persons are mugged all the time despite how they dress as well. It doesn't mean that it's not a possible factor (the fact alone that so many rapists try to use the excuse "She dressed like she wanted it" is proof en…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 07:34 PM
2

Imagine you are walking down the street in an unfamiliar, disheveled neighborhood. You are wearing a nice suit and dress shoes. You get mugged. Are you a victim of a crime? Yes. Was what happened to you justified? No. Were there things you could have done to have made it less likely to have happened? Yes? Could someone legitimately say you put yourself in that situation? Yes. Now, let's say that every week, a gang comes to your house and takes $1000 from you for "insurance" "in case anything wer…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 04:10 AM
-1

You can find misogynist comments if you're looking to go cherry picking, but that has nothing to do with the goals of the movement If anything, it hinders the movement.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 06:29 PM
0

You can find misogynist comments if you're looking to go cherry picking, but that has nothing to do with the goals of the movement If anything, it hinders the movement.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 06:29 PM
4

You can find misogynist comments if you're looking to go cherry picking, but that has nothing to do with the goals of the movement If anything, it hinders the movement.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 06:29 PM
1

Anyone in Sacramento want to march on the Capitol with me?
/r/MensRights24/08/11 06:20 PM
2

Well-written, the only thing you should be aware of is that members of our lower house are Assemblypersons, not Representatives.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 06:17 PM
3

I've found that the first group of feminists you mentioned is the more common
/r/MensRights24/08/11 06:01 PM
2

This person is a true progressive.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 11:34 PM
5

Does this mean the blatant homophobia of the 60s feminist movement completely invalidates the things for which they strove? Also, there's a lot of overlap between those wishing to end the institutional sexism against men and those who wish to establish a white-only nation? Citation fucking needed.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:07 AM
-1

In misadronist's minds, 4chan: real world
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:39 AM
1

because people here are literally defending their right to have sex with women without getting consent No, dipshit, people here are chastising you for saying that in a situation in which both a man and a woman are intoxicated, only the woman can use this as an excuse to rescind consent. And that the man is automatically a rapist. False accusations are bad, but they are completely irrelevant to the issue of "please don't rape people." You shouldn't rape people no matter how many false accusations…
/r/MensRights22/08/11 12:51 AM
8

The traditional female? Yes. But if your wife has a job that pays roughly the same as yours, she has as much at stake as you. There are also an increasing number of stay-at-home dads. Keep in mind the "50% of marriages end in divorce" includes remarriage. For the sake of argument, say that 25% of persons get married twice and 75% get married once. That skews the divorce rate to the oft-quoted 50%.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:53 PM
8

What the fuck does this have to do with Men's Rights? Edit: The only thing I can imagine is that if a 19-year-old female soldier had sex with a 14-year-old and a 15-year-old boy there might not be a case. All the same, this would be a very weak connection.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:37 PM
17

Well, that was depressing.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:12 PM
7

Or a t-shirt and shorts instead of a spaghetti top and a skirt that goes two inches below the crotch. But have fun playing False Dichotomy.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:17 PM
6

And when I walk around without a shirt, women see me as a sexual object. Where are you going with this?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:02 PM
3

Just because guys are attracted to women and have sex drives that are much higher than women's Don't be so sure of that.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:01 PM
-1

That's a stretch. He never said he wants women to wear less clothing, he's just expressing how as a heterosexual male he is looked down upon for noticing women. He's not saying that women should dress more scantily or spread their legs when they're sitting in front of him wearing a short skirt. When I take off my shirt, you think I'm immune to the women looking at me? Or the cashier glancing over at me just to look away when she sees my eyes move? They're attracted to me; that's what's been keep…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 12:52 PM
11

I don't understand. Did you really not read my entire post? Alcohol has the same affect on both men and women: it impairs judgement and increases desire for sex. A man is as incapable of proper consent as a woman. Look, here's how these things happen: A man and a woman are both drunk at a bar. Since they both have impaired judgement and increased sexual appetites, they decide to have sex. That is to say, they consent, though neither can make a proper decision, to have sex. They wake up. Pick one…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:54 AM
19

Do you honestly not see the problem with that line of thinking? Rape is nonconsensual sex, be it through drugging, force, or coercion. Since we're talking about rape through drugging, let's assume that neither party is intoxicated to the point that one is passed out or that only one party is blacked out while the other is still lucid. If both parties are intoxicated, then either neither can consent or both can consent. There's no middle ground to be had. If we say both can consent, that throws r…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:02 AM
20

You know how /r/mensrights crys and crys there is posters trying to teach men about rape? Because men already know EVERYTHING about rape. How come every thread about rape has a billion men asking questions about what is or isn't rape? Most threads aren't asking what rape is; we know perfectly well what rape is, as you said. You and your cadre's problem is that you've defined rape as a crime that can only be committed by a man. For example, when presented with the situation in which both parties …
/r/MensRights21/08/11 04:31 AM
12

Elaborate. The implications of believing that men cannot become intoxicated to the point of being unable to consent would mean that men cannot be date-raped. Believing that only women can become that intoxicated has zero basis in reality. The belief that if both parties are equally intoxicated and consenting at the moment, the man is raping the woman but the woman is not raping the man is a rice-paper-thinly veiled way of saying that all men are inherently rapists. If we're talking about a situa…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:51 AM
5

That is an unfortunate truth. However, I was ignorant that they weren't interested in an honest exchange of ideas; but rather a circlejerk where none of their fragile ideals have to be challenged by responding to criticism.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:36 AM
5

RsonW here. I can confirm that Reizu is not me.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:30 AM
8

Full disclosure, no one exactly said that it was impossible for a man to get an erection without consent. However, the point being made was that a man is always fully aware of his actions and the consequences thereof regardless of intoxication level; that a woman can be drunk enough to be unable to give consent, but a man cannot. The story of my friend is why I find that line of thinking stunningly and offensively ignorant and why I asked for clarification. Of course either sex can reach a point…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:13 AM
12

I misunderstood that men always consent to sex regardless of their level of intoxication, thus if both parties are drunk when they have sex, the man is raping the woman. Read my response above to see why I felt I had to respond.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:22 AM
26

dragged a few other people in to a very long chain of replies where they had to tediously explain to you these very basic ideas. Within 8 minutes (look at the picture), there were a chain of replies about which I wasn't orangered? Check my comment history if you so choose: that was the first and only time I had ever posted to that subreddit. This is nigh-impossible to prove, but it was also the first time I had visited. As far as the subject of that thread is concerned: a friend of mine's frater…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:02 AM
11

I never posted there before; I didn't know they were banhammer-crazy fascists.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 12:05 AM
14

Go straight to the source - their home reddits, where they are the moderators: r/anarchism and r/metanarchism. You'll be banned I'm sure I'm late to the party, but you can cut the irony with a knife.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 11:31 PM
–

I thought it was a valid question; it was the first time I ever posted to that subreddit.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 11:10 PM
1

Fight for men only scholarships for Arts, Psychology and Nursing! Stuff like that There are men-only scholarships for Nursing and Early Childhood Education to encourage more men in those fields. So there are some advancements on those fronts.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 10:23 PM
4

Let me put it bluntly. If we were talking about a woman at a party who was with a man who was giving her alcohol (sharing drink his drinks with her or buying drinks, it doesn't matter) until she said to the man 'let's leave the party' and they subsequently had sex... What would you conclude about his actions? Hmmm? I love how Burnt_toaster has no response to this.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 10:17 PM
0

If nobody cares about it (other than the 24k subscribers), why are you posting here constantly?
/r/MensRights23/07/11 01:19 PM
1

I'd imagine she wouldn't need it; she's a Kennedy for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 01:12 PM
8

"I'd like to respond to all the responses I got from men saying, 'if I can't corner a woman in an elevator at four in the morning and ask her to come back to my room even though she said she was tired... how can I get laid?'" Of course that's what she'd like to respond to. I'd wager she got that question a whole zero times.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 01:10 PM
5

Well, /r/circlejerk are consciously being cunts, so definitionally, yes.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:57 AM
2

Oh man. That is so true.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:53 AM
1

Was this in Eugene, Oregon?
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:42 AM
3

Bartenders have told me that if someone gets in on a fake ID and obtains alcohol, the bar gets a $500k fine (enough to put most bars out of business) and the person with the fake ID gets a $25 citation.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 10:16 AM
1

"Here" is a big place, friend. Where is "here"?
/r/MensRights29/06/11 10:12 AM
5

I know you're joking, but we're talking about American Muslims and Jews, not Arab Muslims and Iraeli Jews.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 08:28 AM
1

I would like you to consider three things: Our argument is that the decision to amputate a functional structure with which all male mammals (including you, personally) are born is not a right held by parents, barring medical necessity, but by the child alone as it is his body. Are there other parts of the body that you believe parents have the right to have amputated from their infant child without medical need? If circumcision is so beneficial, why do so few uncircumcised men get circumcisions …
/r/MensRights25/06/11 02:45 PM
1

Yeah, I'm calling bullshit. Source: I derive pleasure from my foreskin being stimulated. Even if that were true, the toughening of the glans reduces sensation regardless.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 02:23 PM
1

"notably" being a word meaning "a common example". So the fact that it impairs the usage of the penis doesn't aid in this definition? "Impair" means "to affect negatively"; I would say the removal of 2/3 of the nerve endings is a negative effect. I would say a heavily desensitized glans is a negative effect. How about the foreskin being wholly unrecognizable due to its removal? I'd say the foreskin is destroyed beyond recognition in circumcision. My best friend is colorblind and circumcised. I'v…
/r/MensRights25/06/11 01:50 PM
1

Every. Single. Time. To physically harm as to impair use, notably by cutting off or otherwise disabling a vital part, such as a limb. (Foreskin adds 2x the nerve endings to the penis, meaning a circumcised penis has 1/3 the nerve endings. It protects the glans while flaccid; a circumcised penis' glans is tougher and has decreased sensitivity. Everything on this [nsfw] site.) To destroy beyond recognition. (The foreskin is completely removed, leaving behind only a scar.) We either use words by th…
/r/MensRights25/06/11 12:40 PM
1

I thought the AMA advises against routine circumcision.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 12:36 PM
2

Actually, it is mutilated according to Oxford and Miriam-Webster
/r/MensRights25/06/11 12:18 PM
2

Look up the definition of mutilation. Challenge accepted. To physically harm as to impair use, notably by cutting off or otherwise disabling a vital part, such as a limb. (Foreskin adds 2x the nerve endings to the penis, meaning a circumcised penis has 1/3 the nerve endings. It protects the glans while flaccid; a circumcised penis' glans is tougher and has decreased sensitivity. Everything on this [nsfw] site.) To destroy beyond recognition. (The foreskin is completely removed, leaving behind on…
/r/MensRights25/06/11 12:14 PM
-3

that man was cuckolded That word doesn't mean what you think it means
/r/MensRights20/06/11 10:01 AM
2

"The law is one of the few remaining laws on the books that explicitly discriminates based on sex. Today's tie vote has limited precedential value and makes it virtually certain that the issue will return to the Court in another case when it can be reconsidered by all nine Justices." 'kay.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 05:22 AM
1

So, is she a female supremacist, or does she agree that MRA and feminism are two sides of the same coin?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:28 AM
2

But... she was pretty to begin with... ;_; Also, way for her to Rickroll everyone.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:01 AM
6

How do you define third wave radical feminism? FTFY
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:54 AM
7

Feminism and MRA should be complementary. Are you saying she's a misandrynist or does she believe in equality of the sexes?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:53 AM
1

Yeah, my heart throbbed throughout the video. I have a fetish for intelligent hot women.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:48 AM
3

God-damnit. I talk like a male version of her. No wonder people hate talking to Californians.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:42 AM
1

She sounds Californian.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:41 AM
0

bestowed upon a man once he eats paddy 500 karma says this pendejo thinks eating out a girl is emasculating edit: "pendejo" referring to the dude to whom WhoDoIThinkIAm is responding
/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:38 AM
1

men can be every bit as much a pain in the ass I see what you did there
/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:23 AM
0

Yup, this is more /r/oney territory
/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:20 AM
2

Yup. Then I feel compelled to call the next day and the girl says, "it was just a one-night thing, lol"
/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:11 AM
3

TIL OkC is owned by Match.com
/r/MensRights04/06/11 10:36 PM
1

I agree. I think the redditor who posted this could've made it a bit clearer that Ms. Kay was on our side on the issue.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 08:38 PM
4

Men retire later in life and die sooner. Women retire sooner in life and die later in life. I've always heard that the life expectancy discrepancy is due to more young men dying than young women.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:15 AM
1

If they are landlords, then they are conducting business and are subject to Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968. If you have evidence that they are discriminating based on gender, tell them you're contacting the Department of Justice. If they're looking for roommates, keep looking.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 09:41 PM
1

See, if it's a single house needing housemates situation, it's legal. If it's a sublet, it's legal. If it's a complex (i.e. this Katherine is the landlady) it is illegal under Federal Law as it is a business violating your right to seek housing under Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 09:24 PM
3

The second comment sums this up entirely: We follow "innocent until proven guilty" in Sweden, not "guilty until proven innocent." I can see it already. Dislike someone? Tell the police he raped you and he can't do anything to disprove it. There's no evidence and it's her word against his - her word will always win. Wtf?! A woman doesn't consent to sex if she doesn't have sex with a man. This would make not having sex with a woman rape by definition if she decides to falsely accuse him.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 11:46 PM
1

What a lot of people don't realize is that the rapist and the person making a false accusation of rape have the same motivation: power over their victim.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 02:53 AM
1

I always tell feminists that instituting penalties for false-rape accusations is in their best interest. If women are discouraged from making false claims about rape, then a woman who has been raped will have more a voice. (I define false accusation of rape as making such a claim with malicious forethought, not mistaken identity or the like). It makes sense to me and most of the feminists to whom I've spoken, but sometimes it results in the feminist shouting "false accusations don't happen" loud…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 10:41 PM
2

When I was in college, I was in a fraternity. One of my brothers had a girlfriend whom he loved wholeheartedly in his hometown and planned on marrying. After a party, he passed out drunk in his room, a sorority girl went in, "fluffed" him and proceeded to rape him. We all found out because she was bragging about it the next day. We took him to the University health center for an STD test and to the Police. The police, like for OP, offered no help. One of the officers kept laughing, and their opi…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 10:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter