TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rumon Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by Rumon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
27

I agree with Suddenwords, sarcasm does not translate very well in the form of text, if you where going to leave it you should have not liked it. She replies with a condescending "Oh honey" so she's just going to take your 'like' as she has swayed your view on the matter.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:37 PM
3

You will like this ad VW Polo Dad
/r/MensRights17/07/12 10:43 AM
9

desensitizes the glans itself. Not in my experience, could you provide some evidence? My guess is you were circumcised at birth? I was circumcised at the age of 10 (Muslim parents) and the most sensitive area is along the scare. I was young and ignorant of things at the age of 10 (like most kids) but remember being scared, asked my older brother what they were going to do. Being the older brother said cut the end of my penis, being 10 I took it literally as cutting the head off. I refused at fir…
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:38 AM
7

It may seem straight forwards but this part of the article sums it up pretty well. some men will not be able to be considered to go onto a board because it may mean the magic 30% figure ratio will be broken. Even though that man may be the best and most talented candidate if a spot becomes available. On the reverse, many talented women will be viewed suspiciously and tokenly as being just there to make the 30% figure even though they may be a great board members. And of course, some women may be…
/r/MensRights07/07/11 11:10 PM
2

My mistake, you're correct.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 07:52 PM
-4

(37,687 - 23,354) = 14333 (14,333/37,687) = 0.38031*100 = 38%
/r/MensRights09/06/11 02:20 PM
6

That's totally pathetic how the mother was told it was a prank and the case was closed then requiring to go to the media to get any acknowledgement that a crime has been committed. "If this was my son doing it to a little girl there would have been lights and sirens at my door." "Kids need to know they can't do these things and get off without anything," said Newberry. "But I also don't think that their future should be ruined either. It's a Catch-22." These girl are lucky that the mother seems …
/r/MensRights03/06/11 05:15 PM
1

Yes i did not make it that far down the article, just gave it a quick skim through. In the fall of 2010, ‘Dont Date Him Girl’ removed its database. This was not because the site’s owner suddenly believed all cheats should be treated the same. Rather, she had come to the realization a successful lawsuit against her was inevitable.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 12:41 AM
3

After i read >Its database lists a man’s full name, his picture, hometown and explains what he allegedly did wrong. I was also thinking, are they not opening up a path for someone to bring a lawsuit for defamation?
/r/MensRights17/03/11 09:59 PM
1

You can Replace "She" with "He" and that list will still be true. I would not call it propaganda, just a very generic list that is valid for any good wife, husband, Boyfriend or Girlfriend.
/r/MensRights25/12/10 08:32 PM
1

This is ridiculous, it's exactly what I think the conservatives want it to be. They are just testing the waters, if they can pass this it will be a stepping stone to block whatever they think is unsuitable in the future. The article hit nail on the head: One other question: Wouldn’t it be better for parents to be the ones who decide what their children can and cannot watch, rather than the government? Where are the parents in this equation? It's the parents job to protect their children by insta…
/r/MensRights20/12/10 05:16 AM
42

This is bloody ridiculous what got to me was the following: The £2million lump sum she agreed to accept is entirely hers to spend as she wishes - after a bid by Nigel to pay it into a trust for Ella was vetoed. Wendy is also believed to have obtained a huge increase in maintenance payments for their daughter - up from £150 a month to £2,000. I don't see how the EX could be entitled to anything whatsoever. Yet the trust fund for the child gets a veto. Bullshit. Money grabbing bitch, he even offer…
/r/MensRights22/11/10 06:25 PM
3

Anyone with common sense should see this should not be such a big deal. Innocent until proven guilty, both parties should be given equal rights with anonymity. If found guilty and charged he will be punished, it pisses me off how politics has a was of making the simplest things so complicated.
/r/MensRights12/11/10 07:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter