TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RussellLawliet Archive

View 1 post and 122 comments by RussellLawliet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Good job this is in England.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:40 AM
1

Those two words mean literally the same thing. Minor and child both mean "below the age of majority".
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:49 PM
4

Doesn't matter under US law. Distribution is distribution.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:54 PM
9

But they're not prosecuting the girl, who created and distributed the child pornography. This is a pretty clear double standard.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:50 PM
5

Neither of the children's parents are pressing charges. Both of their parents knew that they were having sex and the girl's parents gave them condoms and put her on birth control. This is the state prosecuting a boy for possessing child pornography despite the fact that another boy was distributing it.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:44 PM
22

How can she not consent but he can?
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:27 PM
2

Erm... you realise that there's mass unemployment going on in a lot of Europe?
/r/MensRights12/03/16 07:27 PM
3

Well, the article is about Britain, so...
/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:23 PM
4

Would it really have been any better if Stalin said "actually, yeah, I'm letting you all starve on purpose"?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:22 PM
1

That ain't fat. Hate to break it to you.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:13 PM
1

Seeing some walls. Are they pedophile lovers? Is it my lamp? "Look around you" is complete bullshit. It's a non-argument that can be used to "prove" anything. Global warming isn't real. Just look around you. People think PC is the best way to browse the internet. Just look around. People think pedophiles are awful. Just look around.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 12:35 AM
3

That isn't a source. Just copy paste it here along with sources for your other claims if you can actually provide them.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 08:46 PM
1

That's anecdotal evidence at best.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:05 PM
2

And Stalin was just a cobbler's son.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:05 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:59 PM
2

"it's" isn't possessive. "its" is possessive.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:55 PM
1

If it's a new organisation then what's the issue here?
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:54 PM
1

Source.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:53 PM
1

Source.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:53 PM
1

Source your claims, please.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:52 PM
2

I highly doubt that it did. The War might've cause more deaths to civilians than soldiers but the infographic clearly says "combat deaths", i.e. either non-combatants weren't counted or deaths outside of a combat zone weren't counted. Yes, many people died of starvation and through murder via various dictators but they weren't combat deaths. Trying to say that they are is like saying that thousands of doctors died trying to treat ebola when in actual fact you're counting the doctors together wit…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 06:24 PM
1

Well, if it's a gallery, I suppose you could say that it's part of the art and then maybe it wouldn't actually be illegal.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 09:10 AM
1

Pay for the lawyer yourself if it's so important. Going to court isn't as simple as showing up and saying it's illegal.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 09:07 AM
4

They've lifted their one-child policy, actually.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 09:06 AM
1

There's a difference between the transgendered and the poly-amorpho-nonbinary-anti-cis-psuedo-demi-un-male-DMAB-kin.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 09:04 AM
3

There's a difference between the transgendered and the poly-amorpho-nonbinary-anti-cis-psuedo-demi-un-male-DMAB-kin.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 09:04 AM
1

Can't be any worse than OP's comment.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:57 PM
5

You say some, but humiliation is a pretty massive genre. By the way, which porn would you suggest is degrading to woman (just general genres or concepts), may I ask?
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:01 PM
21

Here's a great video reversal that has much better points (and a lot less random vindictive comments tacked on... seriously, we don't need that).
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:54 PM
10

You never heard of humiliation/shaming porn? It's like 90% femdom.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:49 PM
2

I never said I don't want to talk about it. I only said that here is not the place for it.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:04 AM
4

No, because the point is that all the dangerous jobs are worked by men: the danger gap, I suppose. The point is not "how can we make being a soldier/trawler/roofer/etc. safer".
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:18 AM
5

What I'm saying is this sub is not for discussing work safety. I'm not sure how that's so hard to understand.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:06 AM
8

This subreddit is not about safe work practices. That's like saying "how come the Board of Education never talk about reducing road traffic during the school rush". Yes, tangentially it's related but that's just not what it's there for.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 09:11 PM
5

To be fair, being in a PMC is one of those jobs that's only legal depending on the month and what you call your business. It's a bit like those borderline insider trading companies you see on the internet in terms of legality.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 09:08 PM
2

And thus, Jesus said unto them that two cigarettes shall be worth no more than 1 cubit of rope and 1 cubit of rope shall be worth no more than 1 nudey pin-up.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:54 PM
5

Where in the Bible does it say you can't fuck kids? That's absolutely not in there.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:12 AM
28

Ask Unidan.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:15 PM
3

Honestly? Who gives a shit if they're downvoting you (implying men can't disagree with you...)? You're free to discuss whatever you like here as long as it's on-topic. Doesn't mean people browsing have to agree with you.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:19 PM
9

The reason we're here is to show why their views are wrong, not to shun and disregard their views.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 08:55 PM
7

I meant as a movement.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 10:18 AM
8

We shouldn't despise anyone. That's not the point.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 08:51 AM
1

That applies to almost every issue. Most people are willing to just ignore it until it affects them personally.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:06 PM
0

There's a difference between trying to change what's wrong and calling what's wrong a vast feminist conspiracy. That's the part I take issue with.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 01:59 PM
2

Yes they are. There are plenty of women (including me) on this sub agreeing with you all about how men are treated.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 01:57 PM
3

Let's not get carried away, here. They're not colonising and it's not "the women". It's silly feminists. It's not all women in the world and it's not just women either. Don't oversimplify the issue.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 05:46 AM
0

I wouldn't go that far. 1984 this is not.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 06:51 PM
2

They're coated strings too. Yuck.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 09:35 PM
4

Yeah, they're medium gauge too and I don't use medium. :/
/r/MensRights30/09/15 09:35 PM
2

Yeah... medium gauge is all they have but the rest of my strings aren't medium gauge, so...
/r/MensRights30/09/15 09:33 PM
3

Giraffes don't lie? I think you've been had, my friend. Never have I met a more weasely lot.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:18 PM
2

It's not an opinion.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:53 AM
2

It's not because you have an opinion. It's because you're dumb.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 11:23 PM
5

As somebody with a heavily alcoholic dad: thank fuck I had a non-alcoholic mother.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 01:10 AM
0

Not the mature response.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:23 PM
2

How would you know? You've never been uncircumcised bar when you were a small child, so how can you say it hasn't affected your life? You can't know that there haven't been any effects.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:28 AM
0

Then unsub, or post your own content.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:25 AM
7

So would you support FGM if you thought that partially sealed labia just looked nicer?
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:23 AM
6

How about, I dunno, fucking documents? These are MPs at the House of Commons.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 12:10 AM
2

I'm sure nobody on the BBC would get noticed doing this. Not to mention suits all look the same anyway...
/r/MensRights03/07/15 12:07 AM
1

Seconded. Studies, sources?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 10:18 PM
3

Pussypass: for the things money just can't buy.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:31 AM
2

It's because you can run a lot faster with them.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:00 PM
7

I dunno about inferior. There's a reason blade runners can't compete in the normal Olympics.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:30 AM
11

You can get blades.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:20 AM
5

Calm exists because a massive majority of suicides in the UK are committed by men.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:52 PM
1

And men have evolved to be stronger so we can kill people easier, so I guess we should be doing that?
/r/MensRights17/01/15 11:49 AM
10

We also evolved without electricity and hot water. If you want to go with how the ancestors did it, you've got a lot to give up.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 10:41 AM
2

If you're set on making a citizen's arrest, remember almost all you can do is say "you're under citizen's arrest" and contact the police. Past that is a massive legal grey area.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:28 AM
5

Victim blaming.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:26 AM
23

I'm a crowdslinker by profession. I dodge like a fucking pro.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:13 AM
1

Jeez. Go back to The Red Pill, please.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 01:00 PM
3

Says who?
/r/MensRights10/01/15 09:27 AM
11

His armpits are fucking RIPPED.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 09:12 AM
17

Just goes to show how little the media cares.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:11 AM
8

That's what the guy said...
/r/MensRights28/11/14 06:26 PM
6

Sure, but that's not the point of contention. The tweets aren't "hey, Mr. Comet Man, would you mind not wearing shirts like that again please? :)"
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:19 PM
1

I have way too much testosterone and I'm a cowering little shit. Don't generalise.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:54 PM
-4

I think that's a little too leftist.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:52 PM
2

This isn't attempted murder because she wasn't trying to murder him. If he did die, it would be assault with a deadly weapon + manslaughter.
/r/PussyPass01/10/14 10:42 PM
1

Maybe they should just think about whether they consider their safety higher priority. Take precautions and prevent risks.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:52 AM
1

Um... I don't know if this is just a British thing, but men drinking pretty much automatically equates to them being an alcoholic here. Women can dress in whatever kind of clothes they like and nobody bats an eye. Am I living in some sort of counterculture vacuum here?
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:51 AM
12

Except that she's calling exclusively on men to end violence against women. Why does it have to be #HeForShe? Why can't it be #WeForUs?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:54 PM
6

Playing the semantic game, OP has it on lockdown how men have less rights. There are very few rights I can think of in America (or the UK, where I live) that are exclusively for men.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 10:58 PM
5

gr8 b8 m8 8/8 You actually had me going for a second there.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:43 AM
3

Oh, beg pardon. I thought she was 14. I don't really understand how he exclusively is a paedophile in this case; they were both children. Also I'm not seeing the gay in this at all either.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:42 AM
9

How does that make him a paedophile? She was older than him for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:20 PM
0

People can have genders different to their physical sexes.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:58 AM
1

Transgender people disagree.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:13 PM
0

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that you aren't great at comedy clubs. Ad hominem aside, do all jokes about unfortunate things not normalise them, if we're going down this route? Do jokes about introverts being unhappy not "normalize" that stereotype? Do jokes about smokers of marijuana being the typical pothead not "normalize" that image?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:47 PM
5

Because rape is a women's issue?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:31 PM
7

Pardon? I'm saying that the quote is telling people not to get offended by idioms and innuendos (remember Donglegate?). You can't compare that to data. Sure, get upset about whatever facts you like but don't act like a victim because somebody made a rape joke.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:12 PM
9

every statistic And that is where it differs. You can't tell one group to stop treating idioms literally and another to stop investigating facts.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:54 PM
3

Nah, he was serious.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:36 PM
3

I can't tell if 'the queen of Canada' is sarcasm or not. I hope it is.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:34 PM
1

Everything about this thread makes me wish I was gay. Fuck.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 06:14 PM
3

Romeo was in his twenties, Juliet was younger than fifteen. We don't need that. /facetiousness
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:29 PM
1

Hmm. I may have used an outdated source. Nice catch, will edit later.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 05:54 PM
0

Oppressed minority? Women make up the majority of the population. The woman to man ratio is about 12:13. *I appear to have used a bad source. Disregard.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:56 PM
1

Don't you remember Elevatorgate?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 02:17 AM
9

I don't believe Google gives out their data to anybody other than the user and government bodies and we've established that the police aren't interested in doing anything to help.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:32 PM
3

You need to actually receive an email to find out what its associated IP is. EDIT: Reworded.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:23 PM
3

Um... yes. If you're bothered by the baggage of "MRA", don't use the term. Simple. EDIT: spelling
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:50 PM
6

You know you don't have to identify as a feminist, right? If you're not happy with the baggage of a self-applied label, there's a simple solution: stop using it.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:04 PM
1

The OED uses American spellings, so I doubt it.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:54 PM
-2

The OED has no credibility anyway. They state that their way of defining things is by how people use them, meaning they don't actually define anything.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:54 PM
1

I've already sent an email through their contact page and I'd suggest you join.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:52 PM
1

Sent. By this standard, we might as well add "typically a woman" to nag's definition.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:50 PM
1

I think I meant mathematically. My bad. EDIT: In fact, I'm not entirely sure what I meant. Don't mind me.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:54 PM
0

It's probably statistically true, but obviously child molesters don't fly as much as actual pilots.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 01:25 AM
2

That's more /r/Feminism's turf (usually).
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:13 AM
2

No. We're different genders; until men get pregnant and women have testes, there's going to be a gender gap. We're a sexually dimorphic species.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:46 AM
1

A person can claim that they just reacted badly or misinterpreted the situation if they get accused of falsely accusing someone of rape and you have to prove that they intended to pervert the course of justice or some other legal term to that effect, at least in Britain. If someone thinks they were raped but a court doesn't agree, they weren't perverting the course of justice and so won't get punished.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:17 PM
3

It should be punished just as any false accusation would be. It's just insanely hard to prove it was with malicious intent.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:00 PM
7

Report her to the faculty or other relevant authority. You don't have any evidence but there's apparently quite a few victims that can testify against her. It's about the most you can do other than trying to catch her doing it.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:50 AM
1

It wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:46 PM
1

It's unavoidable to draw comparisons to Nazis when talking about fascism, really. They left a distinct mark.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:33 AM
4

For anybody who sees this should it come up, since I can't add text to the post after the fact: I am referring to these specific people as feminazis, not feminists in general.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:01 AM
5

I think you've put my feelings into words better than me; perhaps a less inflammatory name is in order for this type of feminist? Femfascist?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:54 AM
8

They complain about the speaker trying to violate their freedom of speech when he tries to stop them chanting. That isn't disagreeing. Like the campus security officer said, if they had something they wanted to bring up, they should've waited until the end and chatted with the Dr. They were not disagreeing; they were trying to stop them from saying something they disagreed with. Oh, and for the record, Nazis were nothing like Hitler; Nazis were Fritz from down the road and Tomas that runs the co…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:48 AM
3

Well of course they are. It's men's health. When is it not overlooked?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:48 PM
3

£2000 and two months' community service.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter