TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ryau Archive

View 1 posts and 134 comments by Ryau on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
78

False AccusationRyau/r/MensRights21/05/20 09:31 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Unfortunately shouldn't be too surprising, studies find that in school boys are discriminated against even in what should be objective grading: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775718307714?via%3Dihub A combination of blind and non-blind test scores show that middle school teachers favor girls in their evaluations. This favoritism, estimated as individual teacher effects, has long-term consequences: as measured by their national evaluations three years later, male students …
/r/MensRights25/09/21 10:34 PM
12

From the full story (linked in the tweet): He was criminally charged with raping Wright and trying to run over her with his car. While in jail for three weeks, with his bail set at a half-million dollars, his mother died in his native Italy. Days later, the Hennepin County Attorney would drop charges because of insufficient evidence. Prosecutors privately conceded there was no evidence. But the damage was already done. . in the eyes of the internet, he might as well have been convicted. “Even af…
/r/MensRights21/05/20 09:36 PM
8

No prosecution of the false accuser, because "Henn. Co. prosecutors believe it can have a chilling effect on real victims." He is the "real victim" you misandrist fucks. There is zero punishment for women who maliciously destroy men's lives. In our society every male has a Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads at the behest of any woman who wants to harm them, enforced by the "progressive" government prosecutors. https://twitter.com/LydenFOX9/status/1263541358146412544 "Will he receive any …
/r/MensRights21/05/20 08:44 PM
7

Good on you. I'm bi and the lgbt social groups I'm around are so painfully seeped in this SJW religion. I wish I were brave enough to push back irl (they're very open with their anti-male and anti-white hate around me) but it never seems worth the ostracization & conflict for doing so.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:26 AM
2

Well thats just not at all true. IQ is the best predictor of numerous important life factors (income, education, occupation): http://i.imgur.com/qIGdGqI.png Its validity has been repeatedly demonstrated for decades... https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/the-validity-of-iq/ https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=8021
/r/MensRights14/11/19 03:11 AM
43

http://web.archive.org/web/20191114025703/https://www.nrtoday.com/a-hetoo-movement-fighting-for-men-s-rights-in-california/article_7b2a05db-3e71-542b-a7d9-4f21eabf1fbc.html Last September, Allison sued Ladies Get Paid, a career-development company for women, after he was turned away from one of its gatherings at a bar in San Diego. (Allison also sued the bar and bar’s owner.) Founded in 2016 by Claire Wasserman, a former marketing director, Ladies Get Paid was intended as a “safe zone,” she said…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 02:50 AM
3

In a hypothetical where a guy asks a gal before sex "birth control?" since he wouldn't have sex if she's not on bc, but she misunderstands him and responds with "yes" thinking he's reffering to the condom and she isn't on any bc (he only consents to using both). You'd say she's a rapist and should spend years in prison for that since he felt like he only consented if she was on bc and she's the one who misunderstood his meaning? I think the other posters also wouldn't consider this gender flippe…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:21 PM
10

I have also heard that male preferences for objects and female preferences for faces have been researched, but I did not find any studies after a very quick search. However, they may be out there. Here ya go: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638300000321 The present study aimed to ascertain whether the sexual dimorphism is a result of biological or socio-cultural differences between the two sexes. 102 human neonates, who by definition have not yet been influenced by social …
/r/MensRights24/03/18 06:36 AM
1

I appreciate your willingness to discuss. Thank you for coming here, truthful communication is the best path forward.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 05:20 AM
11

When asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/
/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:40 AM
1

Sorry to hear about your illiteracy. I believe there are special classes to help you with that.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:31 PM
3

Why don't you click the link to learn the answer? Legal paternal surrender (LPS) is the idea that men who unintentionally become fathers should be allowed to walk away from their paternal duties to the (unborn) child (i.e. child support), which would mirror women's right to walk away from their maternal duties via abortions. LPS would provide men with a legal equivalent to an abortion, which would give them the same sovereignty over their futures as parents (or as non-parents) that women have. i…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:36 AM
5

If you're genuinely too stupid to bother understanding what others are talking about, you probably shouldn't bother posting.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:12 AM
4

If you're genuinely too stupid to bother understanding what others are talking about, you probably shouldn't bother posting. Edit: Here, I'll even make you not have to click a link: Legal paternal surrender (LPS) is the idea that men who unintentionally become fathers should be allowed to walk away from their paternal duties to the (unborn) child (i.e. child support), which would mirror women's right to walk away from their maternal duties via abortions. LPS would provide men with a legal equiva…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:12 AM
1

If you're genuinely too stupid to bother understanding what others are talking about, you probably shouldn't bother posting. Edit: Here, I'll even make you not have to click a link: Legal paternal surrender (LPS) is the idea that men who unintentionally become fathers should be allowed to walk away from their paternal duties to the (unborn) child (i.e. child support), which would mirror women's right to walk away from their maternal duties via abortions. LPS would provide men with a legal equiva…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:11 AM
2

If you're genuinely too stupid to bother understanding what others are talking about, you probably shouldn't bother posting. Edit: Here, I'll even make you not have to click a link: Legal paternal surrender (LPS) is the idea that men who unintentionally become fathers should be allowed to walk away from their paternal duties to the (unborn) child (i.e. child support), which would mirror women's right to walk away from their maternal duties via abortions. LPS would provide men with a legal equiva…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:11 AM
6

Surely someone has video of this if it's true. Or does your definition of "harassing" mean 'speaking to people walking by'?
/r/MensRights22/04/15 02:19 PM
2

I'm not going to reply to everything and I think you did make some good points on some things (you've convinced me that condoms should be covered), however, I just don't think we are going to see eye to eye on the "obligation" part of having a kid. Pregnancy is vastly different for a woman than a man, and while there is a huge part of me that says "No, of course a man shouldn't be held responsible!", there is also a part of me that says, "But, in our society we still have so many gains we still …
/r/MensRights11/09/14 08:49 PM
2

However, I have a few points to make. First, the person I replied to is perpetuating a cycle of women having children they don't want (and therefore men paying child support) by supporting anti-abortionists. He's shooting himself in the foot simply because "If our rights aren't the same then NO ONE should get these rights!" I agree with you, and I personally am strongly pro abortion. Second, don't you think that there is SOME grey area? A woman should be left completely, 100% responsible for rai…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:18 PM
3

Not the person you replied to, but what is generally meant is that at every point in child birth and care women have final choice over if they want the responsibility. Birth control for women is covered by the ACA for women but not men. Abortion is available after pregnancy. After birth the mother can choose not to inform the father and put the child up for adoption, or in most of the U.S., can drop the child off anonymously, giving up all responsibility to pay for it. Men have none of these opt…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 04:59 PM
2

https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-birth-control-benefits/ To add, here is the official aca government website directly. All FDA approved women's birth control methods are explicitly covered, including any approved in the future. Zero male birth control methods are explicitly covered. None. Not vasectomies (cheaper and safer than the covered women's tubal ligation) or even condoms. No future male birth control will ever be covered automatically, unlike women's.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:06 PM
6

I felt the same way until I read a hypothetical replacing gender with race. If a white person was abused by a black person, would you be in favor of shelters for whites only so that they can get better away from the race of people who hurt them? How about if a straight person was abused by a gay person. Would a no-gays-allowed shelter be appropriate to have for them? Reading it like that it becomes pretty obvious that it would be wrong to not help victims of one race/gender just because of the f…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:57 PM
4

I'd be interested in learning what would happen in that situation if the father was known and requested custody. I'd imagine that he would be granted custody/"adopt" and could file for support from the mother. If that's not the case, it's definitely unfair. At least in the U.S. (utah specifically for this quote) the bio father is shit outta luck and the adopted family would keep the child. Fraud is not legally considered a reason for objecting to adoption or removal of an already placed adoption…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 12:50 AM
2

Could you give any links to gender neutral real work mainstream feminism has done which works for equality for men? Some things mainstream feminism fought for (and largely won) which are anti gender equality: Perpetuating the false 77% pay gap (and in doing so ignoring womens ability to make their own choices.) Preventing gender neutrality in the Violence Against Women Act. Promoting the blatantly sexist duluth model of domestic violence. NOW (the largest mainstream feminist org worldwide) repea…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 10:33 AM
2

And they might be great reasons for an adult to choose to have it done. They are blatantly non-reasons to force it on every male infant born however, which is what they suggest and what the MRM argues against.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:33 PM
3

According to the article the benefits it balances against permanent mutilation are: reduced risk of urinary tract infection, prostate cancer, sexually transmitted diseases and, in female partners, cervical cancer Three of these do not apply to the infants they are proposing doing the procedure to (infants are not having unprotected sex and prostate cancer is virtually nonexistent in children), that immediately should be a massive red flag about this "study". The other benefit (UTIs, which are ra…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 08:06 PM
3

Being strapped into a car seat does not cause permanent irreparable damage, nor does a vaccine. If a parent feels like tattoos or scarification or any other permanent body modification was a great thing do you feel they should be allowed to choose that for their child? Currently the law (and society) says they should not. You cannot tattoo your baby, you cannot mutilate a girl's genitals. The only time you can currently legally permanently modify a child's body is if there is a serious medical c…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:45 PM
2

I call BS to be honest. Nobody would care. They'd just chalk it up to being a woman as always. Nobody here would say "Not really, she's rich so it's nothing to do with her being female." Really? You think nobody would point out that "millionaire avoids justice" is not exactly novel and everyone would ignore that and just call it sexism? The vast, vast majority of people in general are fully aware of how broken our legal system is to the wealthy. That rich kid getting away with an "affluenza" def…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:01 PM
3

Utilizing "his family's wealth and position in the community," Richards IV hired defense attorney Eugene J. Maurer Jr. and denied the charges, the lawsuit said. But after volunteering for and failing a polygraph examination, he admitted abusing his child, "then claimed that he was ill and that he needed medical treatment," the lawsuit said. In June 2008, he avoided mandatory prison time by pleading guilty to a single count of fourth-degree rape in a deal arranged by Maurer and prosecutor Renee H…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:03 PM
2

I think that's seeing malice where there may not be any. It seems more likely to me to be another case of male disposability. The idea that men could be disadvantaged simply doesn't cross the mind of the people who made the report. To them, the only gender gap is the one where women are behind, men being behind is just "exceeding parity" because men can't possibly be victims. Maybe I'm just too optimistic though.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:55 PM
0

it's their excuse for why they make "women's benefit" synonymous with "equality" and ignoring the situation for men. That's certainly what their actions with the choice of a one-sided scale reflect, but their words alone on that section are in favor of equality. Which is why I point out that they do the exact opposite in the following sentences. The third distinguishing feature of the Global Gender Gap Index is that it ranks countries according to their proximity to gender equality rather than t…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:19 PM
5

That was my hope too, unfortunately if you look into the source report linked from the bbc page they only count inequality that negatively affects women. Any metric where women rank higher than men is not counted for or against the equality ranking. The type of scale chosen determines whether the Index is rewarding women’s empowerment or gender equality. To capture gender equality, two possible scales were considered. One was a negative-positive scale capturing the size and direction of the gend…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:54 PM
10

This report is incredibly sexist, the "gender gap" it measures only counts when women score worse on a metric, if men score worse it is not counted in their report. I responded when this was posted in /r/equality so I'll just copypaste my post here: Pretty dissapointed with the bbc's framing of the report as "where do women have it best" instead of "where is there the most gender equality". The report itself (http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2013/) is interesting, but this par…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:50 PM
1

Nobody is talking about sex they are talking about not leaving viable semen with women. for what reason exactly does she need his used condom? My analogy was bad and i like yours better. but unlike spermjacking, murder is illegal, it would only be accurate if the SO had explicit legal permission to kill you for the free money. In that case it would be ridiculous for you to be ok with putting yourself in that situation for zero reason, especially if your SO was trying to insist you do it for no b…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 02:07 PM
4

Unlike callthebankshot I would be completely fine with that, especially in the earlier stages of dating. Being attacked is a real risk in any circumstance around people you don't know that well and I think responsible women (and men) carrying pepper spray or a ccw is a good thing. Shit I'd even feel safer if they did... Maybe I'll add pepper spray to my SO's xmas gifts come to think about it :) I'd like to note though that there is a very big gap between felony battery / rape (what you carry wea…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 10:24 AM
2

By that logic you would be ok with any partner of yours holding a loaded gun to your head for no reason right? I mean you don't think they are a murderer do you?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 10:01 AM
3

The group opposing default shared custody isn't some small faction of feminists, it's literally the largest mainstream feminist organization in the world (NOW)... If you disagree with their views and agree with the MRM's on these issues that's great but regardless of your anecdotes you're in the minority of feminists.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 10:44 AM
1

Where did he blame women completely for it? All he said was that it was brought in by including women, which is factually true.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:18 PM
7

/u/Alzael didn't say "all feminists" he said it isn't radical feminism anymore, it's just feminism. Which I think is pretty accurate when you look at what the largest mainstream feminist organization in the U.S. is doing: The Fathers Count Act could direct over $150 million in federal dollars to private organizations which have been leaders in the so-called men's rights movement. For those of you not familiar with the term, it refers to loosely knit organizations which have sprung up in the wake…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 03:23 PM
1

If we had laws saying only men were protected from theft/murder/assault etc, would those not be considered legal injustices against women? It's illegal to so much as pin prick a girls genitals but mine could be cut up permanently for any reason.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:23 PM
2

That doesn't follow at all, because opposition to the KKK is not bigotry. Opposition to religion is bigotry?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:24 PM
7

Regarding today, I'd say the picture is generally on-par. My selective service card and circumcised dick say otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 08:38 PM
17

Asexual and Pansexual (often lumped in with bi, as it's a subset) are the two most common not explicitly listed.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:55 AM
3

Bi (well, pan) dude checking in
/r/MensRights18/06/13 01:07 PM
5

no more guilt about sexuality Oh how I wish this were so :(
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:00 PM
6

Don't feed the trolls
/r/MensRights09/06/13 10:10 PM
1

Not all of us were given hundreds of thousands of dollars to compile instances of tropes. Not to mention it wouldn't even prove anything (just like Sarkeesian's video doesn't actually show anything except that these tropes exist in some games). Video games are stories, some stories have revenge for/rescuing women in them (her vid), some have revenge for/rescuing men in them (the ones I mentioned off the top of my head and more). You can't draw conclusions about all of video games by looking at o…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:24 PM
9

Super late edit: Game spoilers ahead!!! Saints Row: The Third (Johnny Gat in the first scene) Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (Shephard killing Roach) Basically every CoD storyline uses 'man kills man, gets revenge' as a plotline really... Borderlands 2 (Handsome Jack kills Roland)
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:29 PM
14

On the second page in the image translating "douche speak to English" towards the bottom it has the title of this submission listed. edit: holy shit it's my cakeday
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:38 PM
7

missingthepoint.txt
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:50 PM
1

"The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim" I bolded the oral penetration part, which explicitly states the sex organ is doing the penetration of the victim's mouth, leaving out males. The definition also clearly does not include forced envelopment of a male by a female. (PiV rape)
/r/MensRights28/04/13 11:35 PM
2

The picture you posted seemed to imply that men couldn't be raped No it didn't. The picture very explicitly states oral and PiV rape isn't rape if you're male.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 05:44 PM
-1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobia#Terms_for_prejudice_or_discrimination
/r/MensRights06/04/13 02:10 AM
0

Your example is equivalent to saying "women are inferior to men" which was never once said or even implied in his argument. My example was meant to point out that leaving out the qualifiers that make up the central argument is unhelpful and can present an innocent statement as an offensive one. Are women weaker? Absolutely. That's what he said. Is this fighter biologically a man? Absolutely. Should she be allowed to fight women in a fair competition? No. I'm really not sure if you're even readin…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:49 AM
0

Had he said "shes not really a she in terms of physical strength and qualities", I'd fully agree and would have nothing against it. Thats not what was said though. In a discussion about the genetic differences in resistance to certain diseases between races you could technically justify the statement "[race] are inferior to [other race]." but not qualifying it with the actual point of what you are saying results in a statement easily seen as hateful/racist. There is just no reason to make such a…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:37 AM
-3

You can justify many hateful and offensive statements based on technical correctness and contextual definitions. That doesn't make them any less hateful to the audience however.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:22 AM
-5

You're seriously denying that the statements "she calls herself a woman but I disagree", "tranny", "actual women [as opposed to the transwoman]", and "shes not really a she" are not hateful/offensive to transexuals? Males are more likely to have genetic diseases in the first stages of life than females, that doesn't justify calling men "weak", "less worthy of life than women", "genetically inferior to women", etc even though there is technically some basis for such statements. He could have made…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:16 AM
4

He has no responsibility to worry bout everyones feelings. If he doesn't care about what he says being taken seriously, sure. If he wants people to listen past the first minute, I disagree. You can have the most eloquent and rational argument backed with plenty of facts, but if you surround it with transphobia/racism/sexism/etc I won't toss my name up beside yours and might not bother listening to what follows.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:09 AM
-1

The words tranny and midget are different from racial slurs, because those are just words that those people decided were derogatory one day. Racial slurs on the other hand are words constructed to be derogatory in the first place, and people know they are derogatory when they learn them. I disagree. For example "nigga" and it's other versions are considered non-derogatory in many contexts, as are many other slurs. They are all just words, there is no magic indicator that they are derogatory. You…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:01 AM
1

I agree, which is why in my second paragraph I mentioned that I don't think he meant to be transphobic. Regardless of what he intended, thats what he said. Someone who used a bunch of racist slurs and called those of some race "not really people" would be condemned for it and would offend many, even if they didn't really mean it that way. When talking about something as serious to many people as their gender you have to either pay attention to what you say or be ok with offending and hurting oth…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:45 PM
-1

I realize it won't devalue his point to many who can see past it, but to many others they will disregard everything he says because of how that video started and I can't really condemn them for that. It's essentially like starting a discussion on anything with a bunch of racist remarks, followed by "but I'm actually against racism and have nothing against [race]". It does nothing to support the discussion and only alienates and insults many. I was just voicing my disagreement of what he had in t…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:37 PM
0

I wasn't personally offended and am all for his right to be as offensive as he wants, I just think it's totally unhelpful and find it hard to support him because of it. I think based on what he said around the 4:10 mark he didn't mean to be transphobic, but acting like people have no reason to be upset after unnecessarily saying things that many will obviously be hurt by is just stupid.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:24 PM
1

I mentioned that in my second paragraph. I don't think he necessarily intended to be that offensive, but you can't tell me "she calls herself a woman but I disagree", "tranny", "actual women", and "shes not really a she" are not blatantly offensive to transexuals. He doesn't need to be sensitive to these things, but you can't act shocked when many are offended and don't side with you because of saying these easily offensive things.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:21 PM
44

I really wish Joe Rogan would have been a bit more... inoffensive in that discussion. Statements like "tranny" and "she calls herself a woman but I tend to disagree" are, like it or not, transphobic and unhelpful. He has a reasonably logical argument in terms of not allowing her to fight in women's leagues, but including remarks like that instantly turns many allies into enemies. There was no need to be transphobic in that discussion. I don't think he really meant to be, especially with what he …
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:41 PM
1

Thank you :)
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:28 PM
1

Why do you even care? Do you think I can help here? Of course you can. Had your first post been "I don't think this is correct, heres a source that says otherwise" it would have been upvoted, and had later reasonable discussion included "I identify as a feminist", people would develop more reasonable notions of feminists. Instead you've harmed people here's idea of what feminists are, substantiating and reinforcing some people's beliefs that feminists are rude/hateful/unwilling to have reasonabl…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:18 PM
1

I'm not really concerned with being helpful Then why post this: I wonder why more men like that can't just join with like-minded feminists, and work towards creating a definition of equalism that we can all be content with. But I just get called out as a concern troll, and an angry feminist, so there's never any common ground. ? Unless you were being sarcastic it seems directly contrary to what you just said. 'Why can't we work together and why do I get called a troll? 1 sec let me insult you un…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:52 PM
1

Where were you insulted from the get-go? The post your first post responded to said nothing insulting, yet you responded rudely for no reason. Even after you were insulting, the worst an mra posted was calling you 'cupcake'. So please, quote me these posts here insulting you "from the get-go". Also, how many time's you've tried previously is irrelevant and doesn't make being antagonistic and insulting appropriate or helpful. Are you saying that since MRAs have been insulted plenty by SRS and fem…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:34 PM
0

Cute how you try to take the high ground when almost every post you've made here (including the first) is needlessly antagonistic and rude.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:26 AM
3

Before posting that you posted: Do you guys actually want answers or just want to have a giant cry together about how rough you have it. You really don't understand why people downvoted you when your first post here was nothing but an insult? Did you have some good points? Absolutely. But they are overshadowed by the fact that you are dismissing entirely good points on the other side by saying "this is stupid not listening LA LA LA" instead of actually discussing anything. Feel free to post a de…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:09 PM
2

Furthermore, why bother? You aren't even going to read it. As an example, the big idiotic response Squigglesthepig got. While he might have had some good points at times, you just don't go "these are retarded im not paying attention anymore". No, No, sweetheart, that's not how things work. I responded to 43 of the 46 points made in the link. The three I skipped were essentially copies of a previous point which I responded to already ("If I do x, it won't be attributed to my sex", copied in #'s 4…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:58 PM
2

And your this post is reported and downvoted for the ratio of personal attacks vs. argument. Ha! In that case the entire r/mensrights subreddit should be downvoted and reported. Please point out a single personal attack made by an MRA in this submission thread. Heres some from you guys: you guys are just a bunch of retarded gorillas beating thier own chests. . the big idiotic response Squigglesthepig got. (great arguments btw, oh wait, you didn't actually post any) Do you guys actually want answ…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:42 PM
2

Study 2 pages 16-18 To assess whether teachers’ grading practices differ over different subset of students, we regressed the probability of a right answer on student gender, a non anonymous condition dummy, the prior grade 6 score, and interactions between the non anonymous condition and the prior score, and between the non anonymous condition and the teacher’s gender. Question Table 10 presents the results for three words. Results for other words are available from the authors and do not signif…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:03 PM
3

Heres a few recent studies showing that the opposite of #6 is true, at least in schoolwork. The evidence presented in this study confirms that the previous belief that schoolteachers have a grading bias against female students may indeed be incorrect. On the contrary : on the basis of a natural experiment that compared two evaluations of student performance—a blind score and a non- blind score— the difference estimated strongly suggests a bias against boys. This direction of the bias was replica…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:51 AM
10

Part 2 .20. I can turn on the television or glance at the front page of the newspaper and see people of my own sex widely represented. Seems the author can't think of any actual privileges anymore and is just throwing obviously false crap out there. I'm going to skip a few of these blatantly dumb ones. .21. If I’m careless with my financial affairs it won’t be attributed to my sex. .22. If I’m careless with my driving it won’t be attributed to my sex. .23. I can speak in public to a large group …
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:16 AM
9

Thank you for the link. There are no sources attached to almost all of those claims which is unfortunate. However heres some more specific problems I had with some of them (I bolded the ones I felt were at least partially actual male privilege): warning, long post .1. My odds of being hired for a job, when competing against female applicants, are probably skewed in my favor. The more prestigious the job, the larger the odds are skewed. This is true for some fields and the opposite is true for ot…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:16 AM
3

At the time that you posted this comment saying nobody calls him out there were already 12 replies calling NWOslave out on his post here. His post was also downvoted to -2.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 11:41 AM
2

there are multiple instances in this thread alone where women have been referred to as "abusers". It's ridiculous. Um, push ctrl-f and type in 'abusers' or 'abuser', you will find the only comments in this entire submission with that word in them are yours and "TheRealPariah" above, asking you where the posts are with that word in them.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:04 PM
2

Both Revoran and myself are talking about what they SHOULD be, not what they are. From Revoran's post that you originally replied to: Alimony and spousal support should be about getting someone back on their feet (particularly if they had to take years off work to raise kids). It should not be about huge lump sum payouts or years of continuing support. From my post that you are replying to: Alimony is completely separate from those expenses, and as Revoran stated, is (well, should be...) for sho…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:43 PM
2

Child support is to directly cover the costs of a child that is half theirs. It's only reasonable that both parents cover ~half of the cost. Alimony is completely separate from those expenses, and as Revoran stated, is (well, should be...) for short-term support after losing their primary/only source of income.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:10 PM
3

So where are all of the programs to help males get into teaching, nursing, childcare, therapy, and to enroll more in college?
/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:36 AM
2

I believe there was an okcupid data article showing it. On my phone atm so I have no link but google can probably find it
/r/MensRights11/01/13 11:43 AM
1

True or not, that doesn't make us look any less bad for doing it.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 05:52 PM
6

it all just seems a bit immature and hateful. counterproductive to rational discussion etc... As a semi-regular /mr poster/reader, I fullheartedly agree. Hopefully you (and others) can see that it doesn't reflect the whole men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:21 AM
1

Sorry, I was on my phone and couldn't see read the link. After reading it it seems pretty clear to me she was silenced not for using the word "vagina" but for the sentence "I'm flattered that you're all so interested in my vagina, but 'no' means 'no.'" which is absurdly inappropriate. If a male representative openly implied a female representative wanted into his pants on the floor the same would have happened to him.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:26 PM
-1

The term for genitals being considered vulgar is not an issue unique to females. Penis is considered just as vulgar and has just as many pet names (weewee, peepee, Johnson, etc)
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:00 PM
18

By your reasoning anything that anyone finds threatening is assault. I for whatever reason find your posts threatening, have you just assaulted me? If not, why are my feelings of being threatened less important than yours? Both catcalling and arguing have some basis for fear. The reason neither of these are assault is because neither is a direct threat. Calling indirectly threatening things assault is absurd because pretty much anything can be threatening to someone. Clothes with skulls are thre…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:18 AM
8

If the people in the club clearly didn't enjoy the misogynistic rap songs they wouldn't play misogynistic rap songs. Instead of not going to clubs that play such songs or clearing the dance floor when the song comes on she perpetuates it by taking part in it then complains about herself.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:55 AM
2

I guess I didn't take the title that way. I didn't read anything about the title into the motive of the people telling him not to defend himself, just pointing out that they were and that it's wrong.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 12:28 AM
5

Ok then reverse the genders. A man on a train grabs and restrains an unrelated woman and refuses to let her go. Do you think people would be standing around telling her not to touch him?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 12:05 AM
5

If she is physically restraining him (as she is throughout the entire video) he has every right to do what he needs to get her off of him. You're seriously saying that if a man just grabbed a woman and refused to let her go she wouldn't be allowed to push, kick, or hit him to get away? That's blatantly untrue.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:58 PM
17

The e-mail may have said "women's class" but R.A.D. itself doesn't seem to restrict based on gender. Here is the mission statement from their website (bolding mine): “The mission of the R.A.D. Systems is to establish an accessible, constantly improving and internationally respected alliance of dedicated Instructors. These Instructors in turn, will provide educational opportunities for women, children, men and seniors to create a safer future for themselves. In doing this, we challenge society to…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:57 PM
14

There is a big difference between this occurring between adults in public and students at a high school. Harassment like this is completely unacceptable in a school setting.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:00 PM
12

Easier than that, you can click a comment and push "z" to downvote it or "a" to upvote it regardless of the style.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 12:29 AM
1

I disagree. Use your line of reasoning on an anti-mugging course taught only to non-blacks. Some white people might be uncomfortable if black people were invited, so is it acceptable to ban them from it? If some women have personal issues with being uncomfortable around men they need to get those issues sorted out, the answer is not banning men from something that could be beneficial to them (and is being paid for with their tuition $ too). That just reinforces the idea that all men are rapists,…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:51 PM
1

Couldn't violent novels/movies/games do the same for violence?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 10:24 AM
2

You might want to read Wikipedia more yourself since that isn't an ad hominem.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 10:03 AM
1

What a well thought out and reasonable response. I particularly like where you quoted the things you found misogynistic. It's a shame we will be losing such great debate such as this since you said you're leaving.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:12 PM
0

The labia is a 100% unnecessary bit of extra skin. I take it from your post that you are pro-female genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:57 PM
3

I think I misunderstood your meaning. You meant that as a potential explanation for the sti disparity? I'm on my phone and can't delete my comment :( My bad
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:50 AM
4

And some men wouldn't be with any woman with anything less than a c cup, should we give young girls breast implants?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:48 AM
5

That person has been heavily downvoted. Anybody can post on this or any other subreddit, how can you base your perception of the subreddit based on posts that are obviously not agreed with by the majority? If I went into another subreddit and posted an offensive remark, would you decide that entire subreddit is hateful too? Even if the offensive comment would be downvoted/moderated away?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:37 PM
3

It should be illegal to have sex with an underage student that you are teaching - that is an abuse of power. It is in many states with ages of consent below 18. Here in MN A.O.C. is 16, but it is still statutory rape for somebody in a position of authority. the complainant is at least 16 but less than 18 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the complainant and in a position of authority over the complainant. source KY however doesn't include this :( source Honestly looked…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:06 PM
18

Well the third option is what he has been doing which is starve, be days from homelessness, have no money for anything, deal with this mental trauma every day, and never see the child anyway.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 08:24 PM
1

I have no issue with your opinion on the matter, what I take issue with is that you made a factual claim with no basis in reality. You didn't say "I think he did ~~~" you said "He wasn't trying to find them. He knew exactly where his son was-- in his arms before he put him on the floor, jumped the balcony and ran out". This is speculation and isn't appropriate to be stated as fact.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 08:06 PM
1

You're the one ignoring what his account of what happened, here are direct quotes from him: "As I turn to like find Ethan in the dark of the theater with the gas like I'm just so disoriented and I just lose him, I just lose him." "you've gotta get Ethan, you've gotten get Ethan'. So I'm um, you've gotta run back, you've gotta run and find him, get him." What part of "As I turn to like find Ethan" and "You've gotta run and find him, get him" means that "he wasn't trying to find them" (your claim)…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 07:43 PM
1

the fact that he knew where his son was before he ran to the balcony. Where is this stated? You're making things up. He states himself repeatedly for the first minute of the interview that he was trying to find his son but couldn't through the smoke in the dark of the theater. If you are saying that he is lying thats fine I guess, but thats pure speculation that goes against what the only person who was actually there has said. Crucifying him based on pure assumptions and speculation is just wro…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 07:28 PM
2

His son being on the floor doesn't mean that he previously had him in his arms and dropped him on the floor. You said: "He wasn't trying to find them. He knew exactly where his son was-- in his arms before he put him on the floor" Where is it stated that his son was "in his arms before he put him on the floor" or that "He wasn't trying to find them"?
/r/MensRights28/07/12 06:53 PM
2

Uhm, I did, and he never said what you are claiming. Did you even read what I said? Here is the exact quote by Jamie Rohrs from the video: "As I turn to like find Ethan in the dark of the theater with the gas like I'm just so disoriented and I just lose him, I just lose him. And then he [the shooter] opened fire again and I'm like 'you've gotta get Ethan, you've gotten get Ethan'. So I'm um, you've gotta run back, you've gotta run and find him, get him. And then once I say 'just jump, if you run…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 05:19 PM
2

If you watch the video interview in the OP, he states that he couldn't find the 4 month old through the darkness and the smoke grenade that the shooter set off, he looked between the first and second round of firing, but after the shooter opened fire for the second time he ran for it.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 02:02 AM
0

He wasn't trying to find them. He knew exactly where his son was-- in his arms before he put him on the floor, jumped the balcony and ran out Where are you getting this? It isn't stated anywhere in the text, and in the video he states that he attempts to find his son (the 4 month old) but cannot see him through the darkness and tear gas, and after the gunman opens fire for the second time he then decides to run for it.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:53 AM
1

That's possible, but my Ubuntu install has it while my Win7 doesn't :o
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:05 PM
1

Good thinking, but what would you propose the reason is then? Edit: and I can confirm it is in the dictionary of some Firefox installs at least.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:00 PM
1

It isn't in my 13.0.1 dictionary either. My guess is that the dictionary may not update on its own, since it is modified by the user over time and people would get annoyed if words they added or removed got reverted every update. So between when jonathanwash and I installed Firefox and when you just recently installed it Misandry was added.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:28 PM
1

This is true in the U.S. but not necessarily so in Sweden.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:32 AM
1

The EEOC’s investigation, which was based on concerns raised by several women in Louisiana and Alabama that certain contractors participating in the oil spill response did not consider them for the cleanup effort because of their gender, has not resulted in a determination that BP violated any anti-discrimination laws. BP agreed to pay out to look good, they weren't forced to. This is really no different than a company voluntarily paying money to "equal rights" charities. (equal rights in quotes…
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:42 PM
2

If female teachers are being allowed to wear earrings while male teachers aren't, then it is a MR issue. The base cause may be conservatism among k-12 academia, but that doesn't change the fact that it is discrimination based on gender.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 03:50 PM
29

I see many in this subreddit who stoop to name calling, bashing anyone who they don't agree with, and just a general undercurrent of viciousness. The word "jerk" shows up four times in your short blog post. Among the responses to this submission there are zero "name calling" words that I can find, certainly none directed at you (unless the "feminist" in the title counts).
/r/MensRights10/06/12 10:43 PM
2

If someone gave you a million dollars once for no reason, then I would assume it was just a random act of kindness or something. If they gave you a thousand dollars a week for the rest of your life, I might think differently. And no, I wouldn't expect you to complain though others in that situation might (pride in their self-sufficiency), but I think many people would look down on you for not earning your living and just getting paid for doing nothing (something that wouldn't usually happen unle…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:52 PM
31

There was a very good submission in SRSDiscussion about circumcision a month back. It went very well and there was a lot of good debate about the issue. It turns out many (the majority who posted) SRSD-ers agree with the MRM's anti-circ in non-medical non-adults stance. After about a day of this, the submission was deleted and removed from the sub because too many people were talking about things the moderators didn't like/agree with. (one person made an analogy to FGM) True discussion is not po…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:48 AM
9

That article is a web feature written by one nose, ear, and throat doctor who didn't cite a single reference. Here is a paper published in the Journal of Law & Medicine refuting the three African studies which showed the very minor decrease. (the ones mentioned in the webMD article) The studies all had numerous problems, methodological, ethical, and legal. Abstract: In 2007, WHO/UNAIDS recommended male circumcision as an HIV-preventive measure based on three sub-Saharan African randomised clinic…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:13 PM
1

And here I thought you weren't just a troll but an honest feminist. Oh well. Way to continue to convince MRAs to dislike feminists.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:34 AM
1

And you see nothing wrong generalizing an entire group and making bigoted and hurtful jokes against all of them? You've agreed that there are some issues that concern men's rights, so why is a movement created to fight for those rights something to hate wholesale? The fact that some members are misogynistic isn't a good reason to do what you've just done here, which is literally laugh about human beings' rights being violated. How do you not see what you're doing is just as disgusting and despic…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:54 PM
3

I spent a couple minutes looking you up and you seem to be a relatively intelligent person. e.g. subscribed to Zinnia Jones, like Penn Jillette, Phil Plait, and PZ Myers. You seem to agree with me on almost every issue. I just don't get why you post things like: I was raised to be very "PC" and went through a period of profound rebellion in my late teens and early twenties. Evetually it just got old. Once it stops being shocking what's the point? All you're left with is hurtfulness and regret. W…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 01:27 PM
5

Bigotry and sexism are ok, as long as they are done to a group that is less privileged than another? I don't really understand why that's good. You're not being sexist against male privilege, SRS laughs about male genital mutilation, men dieing in war, domestic abuse against men, male rape in prisons, and men not being granted custody of children. Those aren't privileges, and joking about them does nothing but harm and I don't understand why you would think otherwise, regardless of whether overa…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 12:52 PM
3

I'm egalitarian, I'm for human rights. Both men and women's rights are important to me and I wouldn't make fun, belittle, or ignore the abuse of either. I'm not "angry at women for my role", I'm angry at a society that doesn't care to fix these problems, I'm angry at the people around me who don't think any of these things are issues, I'm angry at people like SRS, who attempt to claim moral high ground while causing real damage. SRS links posts of people joking about racism, sexism against women…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 12:21 PM
3

I don't doubt that much of /r/mr does have an exaggerated view of how many feminists are radical. Posts are frequently made here insulting them just for being in favor of men's rights (scroll to the bottom of any popular submission to see them). Here is a very good sub overviewing some of the feminist actions directly against the rights of men: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g2eme/feminists_tell_you_that_the_solution_to_mens/ And since you mentioned it. SRS also makes fun of MRAs ju…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 10:27 AM
3

Vast majority =/= all Nobody has said that all feminists support those positions, however you responded to the concept that any feminists support them with "You see what you want to see." implying that MRAs are imagining these supporters and they don't actually exist.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:35 AM
2

Are you implying that there are no feminists who put women's right above men's rights? A few examples in this regard: -Child custody preference to women over men based on gender alone. -Affirmative action (giving women job precedence over men solely based on gender) -Male only selective service requirement
/r/MensRights18/02/12 08:45 AM
2

Nobody said she, or all feminists, don't find all rape abhorrent? Qanan didn't even generalize, but said Some Feminists claim rape outside prison is much more important to work on than prison rape Which is true, it is brought up frequently in discussions about rape and prison rape in particular. I'm glad you are a feminist who is for the rights of both sexes, but in /r/mr we end up seeing vocal feminists who specifically want women's rights at the expense of men's.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 07:59 AM
10

I think my girlfriend would stop having sex with me if I spent the entirety of our coitus repeatedly asking her if she still consented or not. Of course, she could still feel pressured into saying yes while actually not consenting, and apparently I would be a rapist.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 07:36 AM
4

This deserves more upvotes
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:19 AM
3

They actually have a separate submission discussing MGM, and it seems to be very reasonable. www.reddit.com/r/SRSDiscussion/comments/p1u8o/how_does_srs_feel_about_circumcision/
/r/MensRights30/01/12 12:13 PM
2

You seem to have posted the same link twice. (not that one isn't enough, but I'd like to get the other to add it to my bookmarks on the topic)
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter