TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RyoukonTheSpeedcuber Archive

View 2 posts and 168 comments by RyoukonTheSpeedcuber on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

No, that's not what a woooosh is
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/22 03:39 PM
2

You know braille is a thing, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/22 07:54 AM
7

Oh, you believe feminism grants you a uni-mind in addition to your reading comprehension skills being non-existant as well? Great.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/22 04:00 PM
12

Do you seriously think it is not?
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/22 02:53 PM
1

and that other person will say you are not a true feminist. Unfortunately they are the type of Feminist I encounter abundantly more frequently, and to me they are a pretty good representation of saoid feminists. The same holds true for most anti-feminists here.
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/22 08:31 PM
3

And I had a fuckton of girls in my year that wanted to bang the hot buff substitute PE teacher in his mid 20s when they were teenagers. Two of them did. They are fine, boasting about it, just like you described that dude doing. What's your point? You're trying to say that because some boys want to sleep with some of their teachers, boys cannot get raped? And because some girls end up getting raped by their teachers no girl can ever have sex that is not rape with a teacher? Because it sure as hel…
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/22 05:11 PM
1

Indeed. That however does not mean that it never translates obvioulsy into text, does it?
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 07:02 PM
1

No. You're just dense.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 04:10 PM
1

Bro if you seriously fail to see the sarcasm in that comment, I'm worried about your reading comprehension skills
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 04:01 PM
1

Yes I am. And no wonder that you under-report rape when the law itself is worded in such a way that only men can be rapists.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/22 10:38 AM
2

Except that they are not. Over 60% of rape cases in India are proven to be outright made up.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/22 12:09 AM
0

That's still killing other humans tho. Can we allow that? I don't think so.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 11:33 PM
0

How? How would we make sure only true victims of rape are able to get an abortion?
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 11:28 PM
22

Again, as so often you are dishonest and use a BS statistic. This study compares married men to all unmarried men. That means divorced men, who have literally half their stuff taken away, are in one group with men who've never been married. Therefore this study is utterly worthless.
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/22 11:13 PM
-5

100% Ban. Induce early labor in cases of non-viability.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 03:57 AM
3

Except that it literally does not. Blatant dishonesty at it's finest.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 03:55 AM
–

Gee, I was wondering what this had to do with being pro choice😂 then I remembered, pc can also mean politically correct. 🤦‍♂️
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/22 05:13 PM
4

In general, a person that, despite the overwhelming evidence suggesting otherwise, thinks that somehow women are oppressed and that this oppression is structural by all men against all women. In other words: a feminist is an overgrown baby.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 12:19 AM
2

Quite literally not part of the definition. Brainwashed? By whom? My feminist teachers back in my formative years? You're laughably ridiculous. I'm done replying. Have a good one.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 05:38 PM
4

"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of equality" That's the barebone definition of what feminism is SUPPOSEDLY. Nowhere does that include anything about choice, now does it? congratulations. You've been either brainwashed or committing gaslighting longer than i' ve been alive. A real accomplishment. Also, who are you to go around and claim what I have or have not experienced and seen? Just shows how fragile feminism as an idea is. Furthermore: nowadays, there is no such thing as feminis…
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 04:39 PM
0

A) No, even by the definition of feminism, that would not be a part of it. B) I get my info from first hand observing. In reality.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 04:19 PM
1

Ah yes. Porn stars starting porn under the age of 18. Yes.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 09:23 AM
8

Geee. Ever seen feminists when they met a woman who chose to be a SAHM?
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 09:22 AM
9

Feminism. Is. The. Antithesis. To. Equality.
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 11:22 AM
–

Yeah obviously. Because those shit posts are created by the very same people that cross post to other subreddits.
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 11:19 AM
1

As in the number is so miniscully different as well as that most statistics in that regard only look at heterosexual couples.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 10:16 PM
1

Insignificant due to the vast disparity in the amount of relationships.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 09:51 PM
1

Yes. That is specifically about the ratio of domestic violence based on gender. It is NOT related to what percentage of the population was in abusive relationships. THAT'S however, what you've been trying to claim it was about. Have a good one.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 09:42 PM
1

That's not what the statistic is about, nor related to what I said.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 09:35 PM
8

Congratulations. You've shown how dumb you are. Recipocal is exactly 50.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 09:26 PM
1

That's the total, assuming a rough 50/50 split between recipocal and non-recipocal
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 08:48 PM
3

What's your point?
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 08:32 PM
32

Wrong. 70% of all non-recipocal domestic violence is perpetrated by women.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 02:46 PM
10

I think you don't know what bragging means.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 02:45 PM
2

The people in thus subreddit are not a hivemind. Something which differenciate us from the left-side subreddits.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:11 AM
10

Is the foetus the driver? No. Is it a crime for a person who is NOT the driver to have an obstructed view? No. Otherwise the entire backrow in every car would commit a crime. Are there seat belts for fetuses? No. You're being ridiculous.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 10:12 PM
49

Uh yeah, she's not wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 09:50 PM
2

Women, in general, have a higher pain threshold than men have, that's a fact. That's simply because estrogene isn't just the female sexual hormone, but a pain relief hormone as well. But from observing, the effects of pain are better death with in men.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 01:47 PM
2

You do realize that rape is a subtype of SA, right? Specifically, a SA with penetration against the penetrated's will. That's also why the rape statistics commonly used are utterly worthless. (man being forced to penetrate is not a victim of rape)
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 04:23 PM
2

I would. For me rape is a penetrative sexual situation where one person is unable to give meaningful consent, and the other person is using that to their advantage. They don't tho. That's a vigil coma you're thinking of.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 04:11 PM
2

So we're talking about incestuous rape then? That would fall under the rape umbrella then, at least in my eyes. Because we have to differenciate between that and two grown-ass siblings that decide to sleep with each other for example. Regarding the rape arguments you brought up: -a comatose patient also is unconscious. Is it okay to kill them? -babies are not self aware until well after birth. (6 months after I believe). Is it okay to kill them up until then? -no woman is forced to raise their c…
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 04:05 PM
1

I'm pro life. Not pro death. So that should answer your 3rd question. I fail to see the incest argument, care to elaborate? Rape: that's honestly debatable. Both sides have great arguments. The issue there is that no matter what we do, we have another victim.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 03:42 PM
-1

Pro-life. Mandated child support for the Bio father (mandatory DNA testing/nationwide DNA databank) for the duration of the pregnancy(or retroactively). Both mother and father given the option to raise the child. Either as a pair, co-parenting or if one of them wants nothing to do with the child, single parent (w/o CS from the other). Feel free to ask questions if anything is unclear.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 03:26 PM
8

On behalf of the angels: no thank you, we don't want to fall. Maybe try the cyclops?
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/22 05:01 AM
1

You sure are delusional.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/22 01:36 PM
3

The expectation to get a rich ass dude to take care of a woman's children from screwing around, while bringing absolutely nothing to the table, and expecting oneself to do absolutely nothing in the relationship sure isn't a traditional one.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 12:17 PM
1

Oh so you're missing the point on purpose? Glad to know. Have a good one.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 11:55 AM
1

Are you a bit mentally handicapped? Or are you trying to deflect from the issue shown?
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 11:49 AM
20

Even if it is, it shows the actual behavior and audacity of women thanks to feminism. Especially on dating platforms.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 03:48 AM
1

You mean the same feminists in India that changed rape laws? The same ones committing vigilante justice for every non-sustained accusation? The same feminists that are absolutely in denial about male victim hood? Those feminists? No, you do not. Need that.
/r/AntiFeminists06/06/22 07:32 AM
1

Ah yes, Harvard, famously known for being right wing red pill propaganda...
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 01:41 AM
3

You bring up the pay gap? Seriously? Are you also going around claiming it's unfair doctors earn more than the hospital's Janitor? The rape and SA statistics have also been shown to be complete bogus countless of times. I won't even bother with those two. Both have been debunked so often that I'm tired of it. Honey, you are missing the key words "on the basis of". Again, my argument still stands. According to the definition: make sure we eradicate everything where women are disadvantaged, but do…
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 02:13 AM
2

Kinda funny that you fail to see that it's not important to the definition. The definition itself, even the one you gave, clearly means "we do not give a damn about where men have struggles. We only care about where women are disadvantaged compared to men". To me, that's not equality.
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 02:01 AM
0

Feminism, a definition: "the advocacy for women's rights"
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 01:45 AM
4

Just to debunk that BS 1) we have to take each country separately and based on where I assume she lives, she actually has rights. Unlike men. 2) good thing we aren't in the 70's 3) good thing you aren't in afghanistan 4) regarding texas: boohoo, outlawing murder 5) draft, DV, etc. 6) the same men, elected BY WOMEN. 55% of all voters are female. 7) no, women and children first just goes to show that a man's life isn't innately viewed as valuable. See draft too. 8) again, draft 9) I smell misandry
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 01:43 AM
0

Honey, Iv'e literally given you the proper term for what is happening. Just because something is rarely ever used doesn't make it non-existent.
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 11:10 AM
0

I could give you a bunch of sources and you'd still claim I was somehow wrong. Congratulations. Your light bulb sure isn't the brightest.
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 11:09 AM
0

Look up the term "judgements notwithstanding the verdict" 🙂
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 11:06 AM
1

You know that judges in courts can overrule the juries, right?
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 10:12 AM
1

Courts are pretty clear in distinguishing between "guilty due to evidence" "innocent due to evidence" and "case dropped due to lack of evidence" Only the second one would be classified under false allegations.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 05:28 PM
0

Or, and now bear with me, we could just use court data
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 09:46 AM
4

Yes, duh🙄 /s
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/22 09:00 PM
18

I can however tell that I don't like somebody anymore. And I'm not dumb enough to stay in a relationship I don't want to be in.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 09:46 PM
25

1) edge case 2) leave her before that. The moment I notice that a relationship does not work out I speak up. And either we work on it or it's over.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 06:28 PM
30

The indication of how much he meant to her is disgusting in itself
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 05:21 PM
1

So close. Yet so far away
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 09:42 PM
4

So what? The point still stands. As a Man, the right to vote is directly willed to a contract stating that you go to war if called. In Germany the draft is also out of use ATM. But can be reenacted anytime the minister of defense says so. (it's still in our constitution. The same constitution that says Noone can be treated differently because of gender, skin color, religion, etc.)
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 09:40 PM
5

1) onlyfans and comparable sites certainly seem very legal to me, and it's legal as long as one records it. 2) I was talking about the social shunning honey 3)what does that even have to do with my initial comment? Care to explain? 4) there is a proven statistical advantage for women in stem. At the same qualification level, women are twice as likely to land the job. 5) child support. Need I say more? 6) why is it then, that I'm only ever hearing that from women? Mostly ones that seld-identify a…
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 09:58 PM
11

Certainly. Especially with my current age and all: it'd be a fuckton easier to get money I wouldn't have to worry about false allegations if I don't like a guy I can just make up some absurd claims to have him shunned permanently I would have a higher chance of landing a job I could decide whether I want to be responsible for a child or not I wouldn't be told to "man up" when I am pissed about something I'd actually have resources for DV and homelessness, etc. Among many many other things.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 06:33 PM
21

Nah just figured that these type of people will find a way to spin it so that in their brain he's at fault for not staying with her after she cheated. Typical delusional 0 responsibility way of thinking
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 11:05 AM
2

Better delete it. This can be seen as brigading
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 08:21 AM
62

Because she cheated on him😉
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 08:20 AM
2

They're still incels though. We ain't calling male incels malcels, do we?
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 04:58 PM
1

*Schadenfreude
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 04:57 PM
4

Yes, that can happen. When the ride has been accepted already. Now women and NB have the choice to not even pick up the customer if they're male, but men cannot do the same.
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 08:19 AM
7

Nope
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 06:04 AM
10

It's not just feminists. Here in Germany, the entire reporting on that case is just so damn biased. It's really disheartening
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/22 05:22 PM
1

Honestly, some of them are very reasonable. Especially the woman at the beginning in the football stadium.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 10:50 PM
8

No, just no.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/22 10:31 PM
14

There are 2 cases I'm okay with abortion 1) rape: I'd rather have 1 person die than 2. The risk of suicide while pregnant (due to the consistent possible trauma) is substantially given. 2) serious risk of health. Same reasoning as above, regarding the death part.
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/22 02:39 PM
17

Anything it takes to fit the narrative "man always bad woman never bad"
/r/AntiFeminists29/04/22 07:05 PM
9

Because it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that this person happens to have been born with 2 X-chromosomes.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/22 12:33 AM
1

Yeah. Unless, wait for it, you watch the whole damn show. 🙄
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 06:26 AM
1

Why would you post this then? 🤨
/r/AntiFeminists24/03/22 01:15 PM
5

You do realize that that's a satire sub, right? FDS is real, FDSPros is satire. Just to make sure.
/r/AntiFeminists24/03/22 11:16 AM
12

Male bisexuality isn't seen as gross by most women. Hell, the yaoi (gay men Manga) market is a huge mess directed towards female teenagers, and it's booming better than ever before.
/r/AntiFeminists23/03/22 06:09 PM
7

The lack of evidence for a higher deity suggests that there is no such thing as a god.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 01:21 AM
3

Hey u/The_Alphapack Ever heard of kilts? Furthermore: which God are we straining off of? Jahwe? Allah? Odin? Any other of the gods of nearly 4200 religions that existed at some point?
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 10:53 PM
7

I agree
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 10:52 PM
5

Oh. You meant this as an OVER like I did in my second reply? I thought this / meant and😅 my bad.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 02:05 PM
3

Where did I say so? 🤨
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 02:02 PM
7

Simple. Just take into account working people. In fact, only people working more than x hours a week (I think the treshhold is something like 35) Total amount of women's wages/contributing women. Same with men. To add: we all know the other reasons this statistic is bogus
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 01:50 PM
24

Small correction: Total wages of women/THOSE women Total wages of men/THOSE men It actually does not include unemployed. If I remember correctly it also includes only people working more than x hours a week. It's still bogus though.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 01:48 PM
-4

Yes
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 01:47 PM
5

Dude seriously? Because guess what, people can date possibly for years and get pregnant even without being married
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 08:10 PM
1

Because it isn't onlyfans but SWIFT who did this. Any international money transfer goes through them. They cut off Russia, thus blocking their entire international trading ability. This means that onlyfans actually has no way of getting the money to their content creators from Russia. Just like any other international business involving Russia is blocked.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/22 09:00 AM
21

They know how sick and twisted they are. They just don't give a Fk about it
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 03:45 PM
64

Their argument boils down to "patriarchy exists because patriarchy exists". Perfect example of circular reasoning.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 10:36 PM
7

There should be a setting in which you can set a minimum karma requirement to post. Everyone else trying to post would get the post removed until it gets manually approved
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 06:08 AM
5

Isn't there an option inbetween? High karma -> post. Low karma->post needing verification by mod?
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 06:21 PM
1

No, that's a typical feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 07:00 PM
3

Yet they are. That's a fact.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 12:11 PM
5

Let me guess. You think it's okay for a woman to choose abortion, adoption, who to put on the birth certificate if she knows there may be multiple fathers, but it's not okay to give men the same rights?
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 12:01 PM
2

Firstival, there isn't THE medical board. Second: abortions are regulated differently in nearly every state. To put what you said in other words: one state considers you human, another does not. Ending your life in one state is okay based on the medical board. In another state it's not. Based on the same medical board. Face it: abortion is a means for women to have 100% of the rights with 0% of responsibilities.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 06:43 AM
4

The definition of Feminism from the Oxford dictionary: "Advocacy of the rights of women" That's the very DEFINITION of feminism. Sure doesn't sound like equality to me.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 06:40 AM
1

Pretty much
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/22 01:09 PM
3

Yeah, maybe feminists need to stop generalizing men in that regard.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 11:56 AM
-1

Sorry but the gender pay gap IS real, although it's VERY misrepresented by feminists. Take all men and women that work more than 35 Hours, add up their income. Now you have the total amount each gender makes. Now divide that by the amount of people of each gender. Now you have two numbers that lead to this apparent wage gap of 21(?)%. (don't know if that is still the current number) The reasons for the different incomes include: Chosen Jobs, hours worked, overtime pay, when hours are worked (nig…
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 03:41 AM
20

To be quite honest, your response feels a bit r/pussypass worthy🙃
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/22 08:10 PM
20

I mean, there's a difference between FDS and facepalm banning our users.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/22 07:46 PM
1

"You do not take your position as a mod, go snooping around in random users comment history only to then ban said person for being in a sub you don't like." Based on the recent posts(that got deleted) in that sub I think the order was more likely "mod visits sub->doesn't like the sub->bans all people active on that sub because they can"
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 07:18 PM
1

Same here😂
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/22 05:01 PM
12

"did you just assume my gender" if it's a stranger. Always baffles them
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:55 PM
29

Imagine being this oblivious
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 05:58 AM
5

I mean yeah that sucks. But why the F isn't he filing in court??? The child lives with HIM.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 05:58 AM
1

The issue with that, is that that's not an exact moment. The point I was trying to convey is: it isn't like a light that is off and suddenly on. There is no cutoff. Furthermore, we know that plants, bacteria etc. are alive. They don't have a heartbeat or something like that. But that's derailing from the topic of this subreddit. Thank you for your input.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 08:40 PM
3

Firstival, you have an upvote👌 "Nobody gets a say on what other people can or cannot do with their own bodies." Exactly. I cannot decide what to do with the body of another human being. Apparently women can. And yes, abortion in the case of endangerment of the life of the woman is a reasonable approach. Just this week a woman In Poland died because the law there takes it way too far. She was pregnant with twins and one of the children died in the womb. Now all three are dead. On the other hand i…
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 08:32 PM
2

Well, apparently the center of the universe is a pretty shitty place compared to the rest of the universe then. And again, the issues you are mentioning seem to only exist in the United States.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 08:28 PM
7

Okay then. Go ahead and tell me at WHAT EXACT POINT IN TIME does the status change from non-human to human? Because clearly, you used to be an embryo but are now a human. Also spoiler: Unlike the United States, which apparently is the center of the world in your eyes, the majority of the world already has solutions for the problems you mentioned😉.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 05:07 PM
3

Doesn't change the fact that would immediately lead to the cops arresting you. Better be safe
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/22 05:05 PM
4

Why do you think it is okay to kill humans?
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 04:57 PM
6

If by "based on your sad experience" you actually mean "facts and data", yes. Also, you keep talking about a minority of men (the minority women actively try to get) as if they were the vast majority of men. Cognitive dissonance is the proper term here. Regarding the purity: historically it existed to make sure that men don't have to raise cuckoo children. And again, you're trying to generalize. And I love how you think this has to do with a hatred towards women. Spoiler: it doesn't. Just becaus…
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 02:03 PM
15

Go ahead and think about all men in your life. How many of those would you consider sleeping with based on looks? The majority of women are tying to compete for a minority of men. This minority of men are promiscuous, yes. But they're just that. A minority. So yes, it is an issue of women's behavior.
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 10:11 AM
1

First example is idiocracy and you know that. Second example would have to be extended to women working in men's shelter's as well. Thus it applies to both. Or are you trying to say that either a) men don't need such shelters or b) men cannot be traumatized to such an extend as women thus it would absolutely warrant a ban for men but not for women? I made a claim, and provided instructions on how to obtain that knowledge. My job here is done. Where exactly lies the difference between "type this …
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 01:12 PM
1

A law that applies to both men and women is not a sex-specific law. If a law only applies to one of the two, it's a sex-specific law. That simple. For the government stats: Google "statistics domestic violence lesbian ncadv.org" Anything else?
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 01:05 AM
1

Would you need to make the same laws vice versa? Absolutely. Thus not a "sex specific law". Also, do you seriously believe that only men beat up women? Because last time I checked, lesbian relationships happened to be the one where domestic abuse is the most common out of all types of relationships. On your other comment: Societal benefits from banning vasectomies? Yeah, that's not how it works or would work in the slightest.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 11:37 PM
1

What? Do you even listen to yourself?
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 08:50 PM
7

Age of consent shenanigans due to which it is statutory rape. There are so many cases like this. She used tinder, gave a false age and stuff and he fell for it. He spent 7 months in custody, has to do 200 hours in community work as well as 40 days of rehab and 48 sessions of a maturity program In other words: a typical case of she lies and he gets punished.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 01:02 PM
5

Give me one good reason to for a law based on sexes.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 04:44 AM
11

Yeah, because that's precisely what feminism ISN'T about.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 09:10 PM
5

Don't you also lose the right to vote by not registering?
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 09:03 PM
2

Has to be
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/22 06:03 AM
1

Might wanna add a /S at the end of your post then
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/22 12:32 PM
10

Does it hurt being stupid?
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:44 PM
2

The OP obviously is sarcastic.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 09:29 AM
3

Nice try baiting. This won't work in this sub😊
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:21 PM
6

Have you ever been to feminist rallies? Have you ever spoken with feminist leaders at those rallies? Also, those examples about Muslims and Christians are ridiculous. It should be more akin to "Not all members of the NSDAP were actively working at concentration camps"
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:36 PM
7

Real life
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:29 PM
22

I am an antifeminist because feminists have shown time and time again that they do not care about equality. They care about women's issues exclusively, even going as far as to shut down events that are catered to men's issues. I am an antifeminist because feminists have shown time and time again that they are vile human beings that do not care about you as soon as you have a differing opinion from them. There are so many more reasons that I could list here, but honestly, that'd just be a waste o…
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 09:53 AM
3

Dude, I'm also German This post was specifically about the US where the law is: as a male, sign up for draft or lose your right to vote and land in jail if you avoid the draft. Thing is, I absolutely agree with the fact that draft should be abolished if possible, but if it's not, at least make it fair.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 06:39 AM
2

Someone's gotta be drafted in case you get attacked by some other country
/r/MensRights16/01/22 06:29 AM
3

As you're trying to take my comment out of context, I will not be replying further. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 12:50 AM
19

My comment was specifically about a jury. Nothing more. Nothing less. Unfortunately a Jury is not bound by the standard of "if in doubt, let them go free". That's all I said and is all I will be saying. The cops etc can be as corrupt as they want, in the end, it's up to the jury to decide the verdict.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 05:33 PM
18

At 16 you are not a child and know exactly what you're doing.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 02:31 PM
78

In the same country that has a system of ordering people with 0 experience in Law and force them to make a verdict. Unfortunately those same people are gullible and mostly do not care about "in dubio pro reo" and similar principles.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 02:29 PM
4

It s just pointing out a bunch of double standards, admittedly though some of them are due to nature and not society
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/21 01:13 PM
3

That's pretty much to be expected from an echo chamber
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/21 12:21 AM
2

Pro life. That being said, I'm still pro choice for BOTH the father and the mother in regards to parenthood. Carry the child to term, as that's a known thing that can happen due to sex. Then after the child is born, both father and mother can choose whether to Raise this baby or not.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/21 02:27 PM
73

Unfortunately the legal situation in India is such that a woman cannot rape.
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/21 12:48 AM
2

Most rapists are men, yes (most rape women do however is socially accepted). That however does NOT mean that rape is a male problem. Because guess what, most men are not rapists. If what you were saying was to be true, most men would be rapists, wouldn't they? Only then would it be a inherently male problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/21 05:33 PM
2

While I agree that it is wrong, one show has adult actors only while the other one literally has kids dancing sexually and filmed their barely clothed private parts. That's a big difference
/r/PussyPass15/11/20 04:06 AM
4

Because the us has this shitty thing called Plea deals
/r/PussyPass03/08/20 08:37 AM
0

[Superior Court Judge Richard Denner determined that she acted out of fraud or malice. He based his decision on a deposition in which Denise Rossi admitted that she concealed her winnings because she didn’t want her ex-husband “getting his hands on” them.] You sure you have the right article?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 02:22 PM
0

I mean you could just google the case🤷‍♀️ Must be hard to realize that us women can also be greedy assholes
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 02:13 PM
1

You seriously need millions to leave? And hide this money during the court process?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 06:49 AM
2

Context: she tried to hide the money(millions of dollars) during the divorce process
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 06:48 AM
21

If she's too old for this shit, she shouldn't have acted this way!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/20 02:12 PM
14

Not in the US
/r/PussyPass05/06/20 08:19 AM
-1

Yes. But most men wouldn't expect to get treated nicely after those comments
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/20 08:46 AM
2

It's a pussy pass denies because her behaviour wasn't tolerated
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/20 06:53 AM
7

Yeah. They only look at absolue numbers. That's a huge mistake
/r/PussyPass14/04/20 08:23 AM
13

*sister😉 But thank you kind stranger☺
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 01:50 PM
52

If you want to consider People being disgusting based on the believe that women shouldn't be held to a different standard than men, I'll gladly be disgusting in your eyes
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 01:26 PM
5

It's a dummy account so that's useless
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 01:24 PM
1

Yes, for what she did to him. But I firmly believe that a knowingly wrong accusation should be punished equally to the punishment the accused could've faced
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/20 04:23 PM
11

Only 3 years? Imagine the time Depp would've had to serve if he'd gotten convicted!
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/20 02:29 PM
4

Because men's word already is being treatet that way
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/20 11:55 AM
6

In germany we have a discriminatory double standard. Look up the law for "Exhibitionismus"
/r/PussyPass29/03/20 03:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter