TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

S7DNE7 Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by S7DNE7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Luckily, the Judge did see it.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/17 05:19 AM
1

Nice meme. A little old, don't you think? It's [current year] already. Edit: Fine, I'll bite. Care to post some articles you've co-written? Some new findings about the way the human body works?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:18 AM
2

transitory in nature You don't have to send a piece of text for it to become valid, and it WAS in transit as a draft on the servers of the email host.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/17 06:47 PM
3

>makes claim >is challenged on claim >"just Google it" Not how it works. Guess what makes me think you have zero evidence for your claim in the first place.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 04:13 PM
2

Absolutely correct. So let's see those facts. Peer-reviewed published scientific article.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:57 PM
1

It tastes no different than any other coffee I've had You've never had good coffee? Oh man
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:54 PM
1

You are worse than.. well, no, you're still 10000000 times better than feminists. But you are pretty bad. Boooo. Etc.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:54 PM
2

studies have found that trans women's brains tend to resemble those of cisgender women I very much doubt it and I'll invite you to provide these scientific studies. Also, are you sure you didn't mean it the other way around? The way you phrased it suggested that a trans person has the same brain as other people of the same sex. E.g. a female sex with male gender would have brains of.. the female sex. This pretty much goes against the claim that transgender brains are different. And just to empha…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:52 PM
3

No, they have not.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:49 PM
1

Lol, no. I may understand where your misconception comes from though. Transgender means having the gender opposite to your sex. So, your nerveus system (including the psychological aspects) treats you as e.g. a woman whereas your sex is actually male. (Note that I use the biological term gender here, not the retarded SJW term.) Men and women do have very small differences between brain physiology and only a minor part of that is physical/morphological, e.g. the size of a certain neuron core I do…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:49 PM
1

I think youre giving most science too much credit. 99% of it is performing the same actions over and over Elaborate. What actions do you speak of? If you're talking about how to do a PCR or ELISA test, then sure, it's repetitive. But if you're talking about the actual science, you know - the THINKING part - you're dead wrong. I can say with 99% accuracy you're not a scientist.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:45 PM
1

Scientists and doctors are mostly about memorization Doctors a bit, but you severely underestimate their requirement for creativity or understanding. Scientists are rather little about memorization and more about discovery, requiring creativity. If you think scientists are predominantly about memory then you have no clue what you're talking about. Sorry but there it is.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:43 PM
1

When you study biology, you'll understand. Or rather, you need to understand to understand biology.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:36 PM
1

That's not what I meant. THESE kind of people are not capable of being in a happy marriage because A: the odds of these pieces of shit ever getting married are slim, unlike themselves B: the odds of their husbands being happy in any such marriage are even lower.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:16 PM
2

Somebody once Goddamnit I hate that song so much.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:39 AM
3

happy in their marriages marriages Hah
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:38 AM
1

You can just call them feminists and achieve the same effect.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:35 AM
4

a new study >implying scientists even bothered with such a ridiculous hypothesis
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:34 AM
1

Irrelevant, it's still the same movement, and it was the movement I addressed, not the people. And people of the 'old' feminism still exist and aren't speaking out against it.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/17 12:00 AM
1

Oh, that's good. Yeah, it's best to use the /s for things that according to Poe's law can easily be mistaken for one genuinely spouting retarded crap.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/17 07:28 PM
3

Why is that unacceptable? Of course that's not what you implied, but it is what you thought this is about, making the problem lie with you. Unfiltered opinions of anyone isn't a problem. I fully support freedom of speech. Doesn't mean I'm not allowed to criticize anything, and I sure as hell do criticize bullshit. I don't care if it's from a woman or a man. If you do, which it seems, it makes you a sexist.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/17 07:05 PM
3

It's not that everything was better in the old times. But almost everything was better in the old times.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/17 05:36 PM
36

Fat people who play the victim are often delusional. So she probably does genuinely consider herself a comedian. Mental illness is one hell of a disease.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/17 03:47 PM
2

Does comments twitch
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/17 03:43 PM
8

Look what feminism is doing Ironic that it used to do the exact opposite. Literally undoing their own progress.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/17 03:42 PM
3

Yes, sure. Doesn't matter if you don't like hearing it.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 11:05 AM
1

Your mom begs to differ.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 08:50 AM
4

I know quite well that the right - in particular the extreme right - is shit as well. It's just that reddit is predominantly extreme left, hence me calling it a leftist shithole. It would be inaccurate to call it a rightist shithole simply because right extremists are in the minority.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 08:49 AM
5

Reddit doesn't really become less of a leftist shithole just because you point out the few exceptional rightist shitstains.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 05:19 AM
2

I don't give a shit. Leftist views are the source of most of todays political problems. If you don't like being generalized, lean less to the left and reason more to the right.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/17 05:18 AM
1

I'm fine with that. I'm willing to put my tax money to good use, as a strong deterrent and punishment for those awful people. People often use the tax payer argument when it comes to horrible people in prison... but isn't that a good thing? Keeping these horrible people in prison? One may argue for the death sentence, but that would be too easy an exit for those horrible people. The other extreme is low punishments and those people back on the streets in no time. Considering this, I'd say paying…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 09:40 PM
51

Same goes with most other subreddits. Shame. So much potential this site had. So much wasted.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 08:51 PM
21

Oh wow, someone with sense. Rare find on Reddit since it became a leftist shithole.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 08:51 PM
9

Oh snap
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 08:10 PM
2

True, but those are just meaningless internet points :v
/r/MensRights11/09/17 09:26 AM
4

To all you numbskulls downvoting me: I said you have to believe somebody got raped No, you fucking don't. Not in the legal system, not outside. You can't demand people accept something as true, that's something they decide for themselves. And anyone with a reasonable moral compass, especially those not acquainted with the supposed victim, will hold themselves to the standards of evidence. The downvotes were fully justified.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 10:39 PM
6

but would it be reasonable to demand evidence from someone who claims to have just been raped? Yes... that would be the status quo in any normal functioning legal system. I mean holy shit. Innocent until proven guilty also counts in rape cases, no matter how distressed the supposed victim may look. we also need to recognize that many actual victims will go without justice due to the nature of the crime and the standard of proof. Yes. We need to recognize that. And THAT'S IT. That's the end of it…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 10:09 PM
4

Troll account. Check account age and comment karma before replying to retarded statements, it'll save a lot of time. ;)
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:58 PM
2

That just makes an easy out for these despicable excuses for human beings. Imprisonment for life is a much better deterrent. Yes, it costs money, but the benefits of less false rape accusations far outweighs it.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:57 PM
10

What is the feminists stance on these lying bitches? You already know the answer.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:56 PM
2

Didn't actually read the article lol. REDDIT
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:56 PM
9

You should always believe the "I got raped" part until it's proven to be a lie. Guilty until proven innocent, eh? You are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:54 PM
9

No, he doesn't believe the stories unless there's evidence. I mean, I personally thought the latter sentence was an obvious exaggeration to make a point, but perhaps you missed it.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:54 PM
8

It's not revenge, it's plain evil.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:52 PM
2

This is sub is essentially calling for more rights for people who've had the most power in the world for the last millions of years. Wrong. You can circlejerk about the 'so frequent' rape accusations against men, but that just confirms to me that you've never been in the real world before, where this shit never fucking happens. Did you delete your account out of shame for typing all this? Honestly, you are a despicable excuse for a human being.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:51 PM
1

Your point? You don't have to agree with his views on everything. Judge what is said, not who said it.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:50 PM
10

Loser. And by that, I mean the person on the keyboard typing this shit, not the troll personality you created as substitute for any reactions you might get.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:48 PM
2

BASED MOD
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/17 11:15 AM
1

The thing is, we have not been able to shed a lot of the remnants of that history with regards to how we view men and women. But we should, instead of arguing to keep holding on to sexist standards. All I ask is that you acknowledge that there is a problem. Yeah. Except that problem isn't what you think it is. It's plain old sexism and bullshit arguments to defend it.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/17 05:00 AM
2

If my buddy and I get into an argument and I get hit, yet I don't want to press charges because I instigated it and he's my buddy, the law should charge him anyways? Not per se, but others still can, and it's completely irrespective of sex. That seems stupid to me. Treating people differently based on irrelevant factors seems stupid to me. Yet here you are. But the sex of the offender and the victim aren't irrelevant They are. because those factors play into how much the person on the receiving …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/17 05:00 AM
2

It's not plain and simple because whether someone feels harassed is subjective. And thus not relevant to the law based on objective facts, namely the act itself. When you hit someone, it doesn't really matter how the victim feels. You hit said person. Fuck off with this SJW harassed bullshit. Trying to make the legal system blind to context (to suit your ideology) is a worse outcome here. The system isn't blind to context. And I did not argue as such. The system should be blind to irrelevant fac…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 09:11 PM
0

Punishments are based off the extent and size of the crime and not the income of the criminal. That wasn't the question. You're stating how it is. He asked how it should be.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 07:54 PM
2

You're missing the distinction between unequal treatment vs unequal outcome. I'm really not. If a threatening and non-threatening situation is treated equally, we expect an unequal outcome. And this is where you are missing the point. It's not about whether or not one is more threatening than the other, that is not the situation here. It's about the act of doing something against the law, no matter the amplitude/results of that act. If I murder someone as male, versus as female, I still murdered…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 07:53 PM
2

Yeah, it's not like it's [current year] or anything, we still live in ancient times where physical force rules the work place! You're only lying to yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:38 PM
3

patriarchal society(which is responsible for the societal reasons your mentioned) exists. Bogus. Complete bogus. You're part of the problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:36 PM
1

You don't need to tell others you're a white knight for them to realize you are. Really, you don't, it's obvious.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:35 PM
1

patriarchal society matriarchal society These things do not exist. They are used by sexists to justify sexism against the 'dominant' sex. A man grabbing a women's ass is equally as bad as a women grabbing a man's ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:34 PM
3

On average, sure they are. Does NOT justify any differential judicial treatment at all. And that isn't the reason for this differential treatment either. The reason is plain old sexism.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 02:09 PM
13

Semantics? It's literally an argument in favor of sexism based on false conclusions derived from sexual dimorphism. That isn't semantics, that's just plain wrong arguing. Sorry. Sure, we aren't the same. Sure, we don't on average react the same way to certain things. But that does ---not--- justify any differential treatment between the sexes, let alone for things that are not even proved to be inherent to the sexes such as whether or not it's right to grab asses as male versus female..
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 02:08 PM
12

Because it ISN'T fair. He's a sexist.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:10 PM
17

It's about being fair, not equal. Equal is fair. Inequal treatment is not fair. This is not a difficult concept. You're trying to use sexual dimorphism as an excuse for sexism.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:10 PM
32

We are literally sexually dimorphic and because of this we see different treatment for men and women. That's not correct. We see different treatment of men and women because of sexism. Acknowledging biological differences is one thing. Making false conclusions about them is another. There is no biological reason for punishments for sexual harassment to be worse for one than the other sex. She gets away with it because she's not perceived as threatening to the men. That's a result of sexism. Not …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:09 PM
–

That's the best part - the more moronic these feminists make themselves appear, the quicker that movement will end.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 12:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter