TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SAKK1NA Archive

View 0 posts and 55 comments by SAKK1NA on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

youre the most sound person I’ve encountered in this sub, I agree the feminist movement is kinda all over the place and we gotta get our shit together. I think both sides are obviously biased and too focused on “us vs them” if that makes sense..
/r/MensRights09/08/26 06:14 AM
1

Well not really, both can be true at once, no?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 05:54 AM
0

Not at all, I’ve been arguing against the “I hate men” and “kill all men” rhetoric since like seventh grade before I even learned about non-liberal feminism. Hating men is anti-feminist!!
/r/MensRights09/08/26 05:47 AM
-1

See I was going to try to maybe reply back and debate but nvm…what you’re describing is called deflecting blame, no need to bring up racist and xenophobic talking points.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 05:41 AM
2

I don’t think I could reconcile with abandoning my association with feminist, I believe the men’s liberation movement and the feminist movement have the same main goal of equality, and obviously it’ll take a lot of effort and change, but I’m certain at one point there will be no different between the two movements. There just needs to be less us vs them i think. Marxist feminism definitely aligns with both in a way. Idrk if this makes sense anyways im just rambling but I’ll def look at those sta…
/r/MensRights09/08/26 05:35 AM
0

Women are not oppressed by men as a group because men simply prefer it that way. Patriarchy is more so a societal culture or system that can be upheld by both individuals and institutions, rather than every single man being the manifestation of patriarchy, especially considering many many women are misogynistic, which can often be seen through their own perceptions of men.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 05:18 AM
0

Absolutely, im certain the definition you’re using to define patriarchy is from the radical feminist lens which is often misconstrued to support bioessentialism, especially bc it kind of like says ALL men are oppressor by nature which simply isn’t true. Different branches have different ways to define or view patriarchy and I believed the radical feminist one has some(many) flaws.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 05:12 AM
2

Men are not evil by nature
/r/MensRights09/08/26 03:50 AM
0

Your definition of feminism and patriarchy are kinda wrong, im not sure how to continue with this conversation but have a good day!
/r/MensRights09/08/26 03:48 AM
-2

The three points are correct but your interpretation of them right after is not. Not what feminists believe in!
/r/MensRights09/08/26 03:20 AM
-1

The men’s right movement is defined as anti feminist by its actions and beliefs. It’s “founders” identified with anti-feminism. And I don’t believe you are misogynistic, but you are engaging in a misogynistic community. Feminism at its core seeks out equality, that is its main principle, in no way is that anti-male.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 03:17 AM
1

No the one where I explain the reasons why women have lower suicide rate but higher attempts
/r/MensRights09/08/26 03:13 AM
0

maybe im not a feminist then idk? All I know is that women are oppressed in ways and men are also oppressed in ways, feminism wouldn’t have reached its goal without men also having been liberated. And like circumcision was normalized bc of religion. I know I’ve argued with other people over it and how a parent wanting to circumcise their son just to blindly follow societal standards shouldn’t be a parent, same for dating preferences, if you don’t like uncircumcised dick you gotta grow up idk wha…
/r/MensRights09/08/26 03:12 AM
1

This sub has made me open my eyes on a lot of different ways men are disadvantaged but misogyny is real??? Women are disadvantaged??
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:54 AM
1

I agree, many laws do disadvantage men but let’s not act like they are a representation of what the general feminist population wants. Misogynistic laws disadvantage women too? Abortion laws in the us?????????????
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:52 AM
1

Yea im aware, specific consent forms weren’t the norm at the time but that still doesn’t make it ethical? It is unethical from today’s perspective of ethics in medicine. And the main point of all this was just to say that women were indeed historically used to conduct medical research, whether directly or indirectly.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:47 AM
1

There are many studies that point at the theories i described in my first paragraph. But are you just gonna ignore my second paragraph?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:43 AM
1

technically yea, the systemic lack of funding toward male specific health issues is medical misandry… Sorry that happened to you, but it also happens to women to a disproportionate degree which should raise questions, no?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:42 AM
1

well that would imply you believe racism is a trait virtually only found white people but anyways, why do you think that?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:38 AM
0

That makes sense, I never really thought about that before, either way, wouldn’t the doctrine still function under the belief that women are better “natural” caretakers?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:34 AM
1

Thag cant be true, I would be a man hater by now if it worked like that..
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:31 AM
-3

This might come as a shock to you but gay rights are included in queer rights, obviously every community’s people are at the forefront of their movements but it usually intersects with women, so yes the face of gay rights is probably not a woman but you can’t tell me a shit ton of queer women arent by their sides? Let’s not forget what lesbians did during the aids crisis. And idk about other countries, but here in Canada there are a bunch of resources and initiatives that focus on indigenous com…
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:27 AM
-2

All of these are facts…I don’t disagree with facts? I disagree with the framing of facts and statistics. I think feminism is good and has brought women a long way, I also think many women have done things like enabling policies, laws, behaviours, practices, etc in the name of feminism, when it’s actually just female supremacy…which is bad…idk i feel like this is obvious. The way to move forward from now isnt to reverse the progress feminism has done, that would be detrimental to like everybody, …
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:05 AM
-1

Very interesting how you believe the patriarchy has been abolished already in many places. The existence of patriarchy and misogyny doesnt absolve women of being in positions of power or participating in oppressive forces against men?? Do you believe that anti racism is bad and that dei initiatives places black people in positions of power where they oppress white people?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 01:53 AM
-4

thank you for your very significant contribution to the conversation Human_Way_6703
/r/MensRights08/08/26 11:01 PM
-5

You didn't answer a single question I asked, but okay. Also, why is it women's job to help men? Actual feminists want to abolish the patriarchy, capitalism, racism, and homophobia with it, and every single one of these goals helps men, so actual feminists DO fight for your cause as well. But even if the feminist movement ONLY wanted advancement for women, and women only, why is that so bothersome? For all of history, women have fought for their causes; women have always had to fight for their ri…
/r/MensRights08/08/26 10:33 PM
1

"The consent form signed by Lacks, typical for the time period, gave doctors permission to treat her but did not mention research. Lacks never knew her cells had been harvested. Her family was not told that HeLa cells propelled scientific advances, including the polio vaccine, cancer therapies and in vitro fertilization." - Johns Hopkins Medicine, 2016 No matter what way you try to word it, what happened was not ethical.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 09:53 PM
-15

Feminist-influenced courts and law enforcement practices heavily influence male suicide rates, as addressed above. I can acknowledge that women are sometimes favoured by these practices, but many of these "feminist-influenced" practices are being misinterpreted. Before more women entered the workforce, it was largely true that women were more likely to have sole or main custody of the child, but that was because of the belief that women are "innate caretakers" and homemakers; this is because of …
/r/MensRights08/08/26 09:46 PM
1

https://www.cnn.com/2016/06/06/us/sexual-assault-brock-turner-stanford https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-25/intellectually-disabled-child-rapist-released-not-fit-to-plead-/103747040
/r/MensRights08/08/26 09:18 PM
-22

What do male suicide rates have to do with women, and what do boys failing at school have to do with women?
/r/MensRights08/08/26 09:09 PM
-7

https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/09/17/taliban-deny-afghan-girls-their-education-and-future https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/06/1164476
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:40 PM
4

Women with endometriosis having to fight for years to get surgical treatment is medical misogyny. A woman having to plead for hysterectomies because of a debilitating chronic disease is medical misogyny. A woman being told she will not be getting life-changing treatment because she "might want kids later" or her "future husband won't be happy with her lack of fertility" is medical misogyny.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:34 PM
1

Henrietta Lacks signed a form for treatment, but she did not sign a consent form for her cells to be taken and sent all over the world for research. The consent form did not allow doctors to take a piece of her tumour without her knowing. So technically, yes, she did sign a consent form, but what she signed did not give consent for her cells to be taken.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:23 PM
0

I guess? Patriarchy is a social system, just like racism and heteronormativity. Misogyny is the active reinforcement of patriarchy, just like how homophobia is reinforcing a heteronormative society. I don't get your point.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:20 PM
0

Can you explain how contributing to policy in media, academia, and law to be in-line with feminist ideology while also entrenching the disparities in rights between the sexes isn't happening to enforce ideology? Explain to me what "disparities in rights between the sexes" you are seeing. So it's just the feminists with any say in the shaping of policy in media, academia, and law that say otherwise. You know, just the ones who matter at all. Okay, so yes, I understand you've seen some women in po…
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:16 PM
1

In what way is feminism anti-male? And how was this shown "time and time again"?
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:55 PM
1

No. They usually use less-lethal methods because they consider the impact on the people around them, the person who will find them, and things like social pressure to care about appearance. Women are less likely to attempt to commit suicide in a way that can cause them disfigurement, especially if they do end up surviving; also, in general, guns and gun culture are usually more accessible and aimed towards men. Either way, the focus should be on helping people's mental health. You seem mad that …
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:53 PM
2

Well yea no shit. I'm just saying that historically women were, in fact, used for medical research. Did Dr. James Marion Sims have to abuse the bodies of enslaved women to conduct his research? Do you know who Henrietta Lacks is? Her family lived in poverty while her cells aided the medical field in turning into what we have now. Those cells were taken from her without her consent, and she died not knowing she would've saved millions of lives. Also, the reason women were excluded from medical re…
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:40 PM
1

You're so close to getting the point. It absolutely is true that men commit suicide more than women; it's also true that women attempt (and fail) suicide more, and there are reasons for that: men usually use more lethal methods to commit suicide and are less likely to express their struggles, and women are less likely to use lethal methods and are more likely to avoid wanting to be a burden to the people around them. I think both statistics are equally important, and both point to different thin…
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:25 PM
1

I didn’t concede the point i just don’t know what youre talking about like at all. And yea I don’t doubt those things happen, im saying they didn’t happen to enforce some kind of “feminazi” ideology of some kind, and again, the average feminist will tell you rape can be committed by anybody regardless of gender, same for domestic violence, but it’s also important to acknowledge the demographic those things disproportionately impact
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:11 AM
1

Im taking about the numbers, 1 and 2, with the link
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:02 AM
1

well I mean yea if a man’s interests, within his privilege, is women’s oppression, he is evil im not rejecting criticism i just don’t don’t understand what you’re talking about or citing. absolutely no actual feminist believes any of this bs you cited
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:50 AM
1

the oppression of women, or anyone for that matter, is evil misogynistic men are bad non-misogynistic men arent bad? idk if that’s what you mean…? and yea idk maybe re-re-examine feminism…maybe a different branch, marxist feminism is great
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:24 AM
0

yes the kkk is anti-black?? 😭😭 they literally identify themselves as a white nationalist far right (HATE) group, so yes they are anti-black….amongst other things Feminism isnt inherently anti-male, yea some more radicalized and reactionary women that say “kill all men” might be all you see but not a single branch of feminism has a core principle that describes the hatred of men
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:14 AM
0

that “innate oppression” part is bioessentialism, which goes against like the most basic of basics in most branches of feminism. and theres also huge talk about how women should break the cycle of misogyny in their households. I don’t really get what your point is (if you could specify it pls), but I’m pretty sure you’re just running with a misinformed idea of what feminism is
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:06 AM
1

thats literally like not true
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:01 AM
1

straight women arent any more homophobic than straight men? and queer women are also victims of homophobia so now what?
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:00 AM
1

the average non liberal feminist would agree with that statement
/r/MensRights08/08/26 06:53 AM
1

are you implying that women don’t struggle with mental health???
/r/MensRights08/08/26 06:48 AM
0

Probably because in times of conflict, women and children usually face disproportionate abuse, women also have the burden of being expected to take care of the children as well. I remember doing research about the ongoing conflict in Sudan and seeing how women (and girls) bear the burden of having to take care of the kids, cook, and essentially “hold down” communities, especially bc many men are dead or fighting.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 06:44 AM
-1

it’s not only about laws…?? yall be on this sub acting like everything happens in a vacuum.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:22 AM
0

Most non liberal or non terf radical feminist disagree with bioessentialism so…??
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:12 AM
-2

do you think anti racism is anti white?
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:08 AM
1

“It’s always these women” why are you acting like those “omg lucky” comments arent made by boys and men??
/r/MensRights08/08/26 12:50 AM
-8

the so called “father of gynecology” built his career on the abuse and pain of women, especially black women…??? and also even IF women were NEVER historically used for research, which again isn’t true, it would only be because their “desire to protect women” stems from them being seen as incubators and care takers
/r/MensRights08/08/26 12:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter