TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SPACKlick Archive

View 1 posts and 26 comments by SPACKlick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

Social IssuesSPACKlick/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:48 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Well yeah, and in common parlance and even during legal discussions they are all called rape. It's just that a law against Rape has existed in the UK since time immemorial and back then women raping wasn't something considered to happen. The new laws have been put in place to offer the same punishments for the modern understanding of rape, it's just some of it, technically, isn't legally called rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/21 02:55 PM
4

Assuming she doesn't have a penis and penetrate him with it. If she penetrates him with something then it's sexual assault by penetration and if she forces herself onto him it's Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/21 10:12 AM
67

No, you have it wrong, Allowing someone to sell their own nudes and give you some of the proceeds is worse than taking someone else's organs and selling them and keeping all of the proceeds.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/20 10:22 AM
1

I've literally been with drunk/high people who have thought the following were a toilet; a keyboard, an armchair, an empty space (they fell over trying to sit on it).
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/19 10:51 PM
2

Complainant is the word your looking for.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:53 PM
2

Because the men's own wives will likely be the least of their concern. They don't want other people's wives to see them in a moment of embarassment. As I said, I don't agree with the policy but I can see the thinking behind it (even if it is likely, partly a dig at women's only gyms)
/r/MensRights07/08/17 09:36 PM
4

Well, that's what I originally wrote and then I thought that with 0 respect there would be no respect going either way and also I don't have zero respect for these people, they're not baby molesting child murderers and I would put them out if they were on fire. So I went with near zero. As for the downvotes, no sweat, it's only internet points. I disagreed with someone on the internet, I knew the risks.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 03:14 PM
14

No it's not. Respect goes both ways is true when the amount of respect is near zero.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:34 PM
3

One point worth making is that several google employees have come forward and said he completely misunderstands how their affirmative action works and that the final decision on who is employed is based purely on merit and resume. One of the programs google has that seems to target the right part of the problem is they send panels to educational institutions to try and encourage groups who wouldn't normally apply to those fields to consider training towards them and applying in case they feel th…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:29 PM
37

I know my father would care. He switched to having a barber come to his home a few years ago because he was embarrassed by having to remove his hairpiece to have his natural hair trimmed, he's quite old fashioned and certainly feels more embarrassed about it infront of ladies. That said I think all businesses should get rid of gender specific or race specific times or rules at their work, people who feel embarrassed basically need to gtf over it.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:25 PM
4

It's hard to critique because it's essentially correct. A virgin is only a social concept because of the value placed on it when trading for brides. The idea of applying virginity to men is significantly more modern and never really carried any social wait to begin with. It wasn't so much that men thought dicks were important though, it was because women's value was based on how confident you could be that when they performed their (as considered then) primary function of bearing children that t…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:19 PM
18

This. I think they guy's a dickhead for his views, and for the whole drawing his gun on a cabby because he thought he was iraqi thing. If this punch came from nowhere then he'd be a dickhead but this was a pre-planned battle. Two sides turned up to fight. In the full video there are calls of "Hold the line" and "Left Flank" before she gets hit. This is combat, it isn't a sneak attack. You join the fight, you expect to get hit.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:54 AM
13

To be fair, if someone's ducking and weaving effectively, you hit where you hit.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:50 AM
1

While I disagree with most of what he said, I want to defend this point. The mental effects I got from being raped were pretty much limited to disgust at my rapist. I didn't feel "violated".
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:55 PM
2

Interestingly, in order for it to be rape, in the uk, in the forced eating out case you would need to prove the tongue penetrated the woman, if it was just on the surface she would be guilty of sexual assault and jailed for a maximum of 10 years. If the tongue entered the vagina she's getting 10 years to life.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:53 PM
2

I was asleep, she wanted sex, I couldn't stop her (asleep) and her physical contact caused an involuntary erection with which she pleasured herself vaginally. I woke up mid coitus and threw her off. Even with the shock, anger and disgust I still had an erection for 5-10 minutes.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:51 PM
3

That's not true. Section 4 subsections 4)c) and d) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 states (where A is the criminal and B is the victim) that if B is forced to penetrate an anus, a vagina or a mouth (with a penis) that is the same crime as A penetrating B in the anus, vagina or in the mouth(with a penis). (1)A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally causes another person (B) to engage in an activity, (b)the activity is sexual, (c)B does not consent to engaging in the activity, and (…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:49 PM
2

I don't like either term. I tend to self describe as a guy that got raped. It's not a present thing, I'm not currently a victim and I wasn't at risk of death so I'm not a survivor. I'm a guy who was once raped. It's in the past and I prefer describing it that way.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:44 PM
2

And note for those unfamiliar with the law Ss 4)c) and d) cover men being raped by being forced to penetrate. (4)A person guilty of an offence under this section, if the activity caused involved— (a)penetration of B’s anus or vagina, (b)penetration of B’s mouth with a person’s penis, (c)penetration of a person’s anus or vagina with a part of B’s body or by B with anything else, or (d)penetration of a person’s mouth with B’s penis, is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:42 PM
-2

I generally agree with your point but there are levels of dickishness that fall short of "attack" that warrant a cuff around the heed.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:33 PM
3

Articles are usually alright, headlines are often clickbait cancer.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:31 PM
5

Ah I can see you have really sound reasons for banning people from saying the word nigger. Now I have a question for you. I'm online, you don't know shit about my race? Can I call my black friend my nigger? If so, why? If not, why not?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 02:22 AM
5

I don't vouch for the credibility of any individual source in the list but here are the sources I've seen Spectator Spero psychology today World Net Daily Horn News Daily Caller HuffPo (only confirms duration of sentence) Hollywood Reporter
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:52 PM
13

From the spectator article on her; Rita (one of the accomplices) on sticking the metal rod up the victims rectum “He was a homo anyway.” How did she know? “When I stuck the bar up his rectum he wiggled.” Worth noting "It was Donna who delivered a ransom note and tape to a friend of Vigliarole’s, who was able to get a partial license plate number of the car she was driving." "there was another moment, on our second day together, when she slipped verbally, and said in an almost irritable way, “He …
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:44 PM
1

1) Not Triggered. 2) Wasn't ignoring that the left has spawned this, note I introduced the regressive left when you wee talking about marxism. The very people responsible for the vile things coming from the far left.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 04:30 PM
1

Marxism is an extreme leftist position. As are the positions of the regressive left. Left however is not the same as marxism. Don't assume the worst of the other on the whole of the other.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 12:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter