Do they say zero or just "Vote"? Reddit only reveals the upvotes of new comments after some time has elapsed (exact time configurable by subreddit mods I think).
I think I heard something like someone doxxed her or was saving her pictures, not too sure. u/stockingsinrainboots is her spiritual replacement though.
Pet peeve: When OP asks a list of questions and someone just list answers so you can't tell which question each answer is for without scrolling back and forth.
Yeah but it's a tradeoff is my point and not an inherent advantage/disadvantage. Women have the advantage that if they're attractive they'll have an easier time getting 200 viewers while men have the advantage that even if they're nit good looking they can still become a 20K+ streamer.
Networking, right place right time, entertaining, funny, etc. The same for any massive streamer really male or female. Although to become a massive streamer as a woman you do need the previously mentioned and to be relatively good looking.
This is kind of an inaccurate comparison. Only a subset of fast food eaters are 'shamed' which are those who eat way too much and lead unhealthy lives while all buyers of SW content are 'shamed'.
What happened by the way with the really attractive girl you were playing games with for hours with and her dad was some sort of alt-right political organizer(?) or did I get PPD users mixed up?
I don't know man, mods aren't online 24/7, maybe no one reported it yet. I think there's more likely explanations than the mods have a hidden doctrine to engagement bait.
Attractive & sexual female artists rarely have a large base of straight male fans. Female artists in general struggle to retain many straight male fans to be honest.
Not just that, purplish_possum is old but I wouldn't be shocked if he has wild kinks. I feel you give off vanilla vibes so I was shocked to see the results.
Does anyone else have this bug on the Reddit app where the red badge on the Inbox at the bottom doesn't disappear even after you read the notification? How does a billion dollar company mess up a simple app this bad? It crashes and doesn't recognize input so often it's ridiculous.
It's probably a pipeline. You don't start off this extreme. You start off with light kink / BDSM then end up like this with a hundred steps in between.
What does menu mean in this context? But yeah, I figured it's typically a prostitution party, just curious on if they're doing depraved shit like in the alleged Dubai yachts / Diddy parties or potentially underaged girls.
She's really making 6 figures a month with a faceless OF account? Or did she start showing her face when she made enough money that it transitioned from a side hustle to a main job?
Don't most people watch it on their second monitor while doing something else on the main monitor? I don't think people are staring for 6 hours straight at a stream unless it's a very entertaining stream.
How often do you guys think about PPD in your day to day life? Like "This will be a good story/experience/question to tell on PPD" when you experience or see something, "This is something X user would have said" etc.
I'm not talking about the girl on the right from their perspective (53 year old) I'm talking about the little girl on the right from the perspective of the picture.
I love the PPD Daily Thread. It's like watching a scuffed TV show with the cast being the regulars giving us (the lurkers, occasional posters) updates about their lives, experiences and arguing.
Well, I obviously can't exactly know what you are but the vast majority aren't the top intelligence in their field. Are you implying you're at the top bracket of intelligence/skill in your field?
You can only empathize with situations you have personally been in? Like, if a friend laments about their partner being murdered you can empathize with that situation even though your partner hasn't (probably) been killed.
Trolling isn't of human nature, there's no reason anyone should troll in 2024. It will lead to the break down of society since our ancestors did not engage in online trolling.
Q4M: Your girlfriend came home from a Drake concert and she's asleep in the morning. You scroll through TikTok and see a video of her being called onto stage by Drake to grind on him and she does it. What are you doing? Q4W: Your boyfriend came home from an Ice Spice concert and he's asleep in the morning. You scroll through TikTok and see a video of him being called onto stage to get a lap dance from her and he receives it. What are you doing?
That's a ridiculous exaggerations and makes it seem like you're working backwards to find a reason why you don't like anime/manga. How many anime/manga have you watched/read or know?
Sleep is overrated and only for weak folk. Real men know that they have to work hard and get knowledge so they can fuck more women (the real goal in life).
4:00 AM - wake up 4:00 AM-6:00 AM - workout 6:00 AM-6:30 AM - shower, eat breakfast etc 6:30 AM-7:00 AM - read an entire book 7:00 AM-9:00 AM - have a threesome 9:00 AM-5:00 PM - go to 'work' but actually work on your own business 5:00 PM-11:00AM - fuck more women 11:00 AM-12:00AM - eat dinner, shower, etc 12:00AM-4:00AM - sleep
So to get high Elo you need to swipe left on people and have people swipe right on you? What is the purpose of high Tinder Elo? Does the algo then match you up with folks that also have high Elo (= more attractive)?
Like focusing on bettering your career and fitness over chasing the opposite sex, not putting in more effort than you receive etc. Doesn't everyone agree on that?
It doesn't have to be material priorities per se. It could be time spent learning, picking up new hobbies, etc. These activities could still be extremely meaningful.
One could argue that any violation of a person's autonomy is wrong, and indeed it may very well be, but in the case of sexual strategy, morality is absent, meaning that r*pe isn't wrong, just unfair. Why are sexual strategies amoral? You claim it is but never give any reasons as to why.
Is your point that a non-zero amount of people use that term? I suppose you would be correct, but my point was that a vast majority of LGBT folks I see online use cis women.
I mean, the exact same article says: It is important to note, however, that neither of these studies recruited representative samples of women, so we cannot know if these percentages are accurate for women in general.
Why would a loyal man not sleep with his female friends if no commited relationship is currently present. That does not make him any less loyal, does it?
I imagine most people code shift a lot from talking to their partner, stranger, siblings, friends etc. You usually only see one side of a person's personality.
What did you mean by: Plenty of women were happy with their lifes. Unfortunately, small group of women who never should have married and have children decided to start a revolution and destroy the life for the rest of us. then?
But it's not the businesses making a calculated decision in the basement to pay women less. It's the hiring folks who likely see women as less capable so they pay them less, they don't see the profits of the business anyway so they shouldn't care.
I notice that it's been fashionable over the past number of years for educated women of a certain class to use the s-word in particular. s-word as in shit or something else?
You should generally have a baseline respect for people (as long as they don't wrong you), don't you agree? Or are you just an asshole to everyone you meet?
I'll happily share a woman with the man she desires more than me so she doesn't have to cheat. Why would she stay with you if she found someone more desirable?
...What does that have to do with anything? I'm not asking for the definition for adulthood. I'm claiming that my definition for a 'woman' is the only satisfactory definition.
I'm not sure why you consider mine to be an incomplete definition. A "woman" doesn't have an intrinsic meaning and I bet no one can come up with a satisfactory definition. "A woman is an adult who can get pregnant" Not all women are fertile, are they not women? "A woman is an adult who has a vagina" Not all women have vaginas, are they not women then? "A woman is an adult who has XX chromosones" Some women are born with mosaic genetics, are they not women then? Therefore, we arrive at the conclu…
I didn't know panic attacks can get so intense. My usual ones are fast heartbeats, get very hot (is this a consequence of fast heartbeats?). I also get very fidgety.
If you know your SO (like all women, amirite?) plays mental games, shit tests you. Even though you can continue, why do you want to live in such a household with the only benefit potentially being kids with the looming danger of being 'divorce rapee'?
What are the deep flaws of men? Anywho this is a lie: But women in any other context are mostly fine. IDK about you, but Terpers don't think women are interesting - they much prefer their male friend to talk to. I don't see the relevancy of point two in regards to what we're currently discussing? For these thinkers, only then do other factors become relevant, such as mutual compatibility, shared goals and dreams, respectful behavior, etcetera. So the women who Terpers marry don't shit test play …
If you had an FWB for some time wouldn't you get 2/3 of these benefits? Kids, I can understand. Marriage and long term stability, not really. I'm not sure why you'd want to get married in this day and age (from a TRP prespective) and what long term stability is there with LTRs that wouldn't be there otherwise?
More meaningful company Terpers think men are more interesting than women. Wouldn't it be smarter to have a large male friend group than dealing with the issue that arise from LTRs? I don't think I've seen a Terper care about their SO giving them meaningful company. Also, kids. SMH it makes more sense as a terpie to want a lot of kids or to at least have some :d that's part of evo psych, winners = those who have children. Are kids worth all this trouble? It seems that you'll just be miserable.
What do people define 'feminine' as? The Wikipedia description is as follows: Traits such as nurturance, sensitivity, sweetness, supportivenes, gentleness, warmth, passivity, cooperativeness, expressiveness, modesty, humility, empathy, affection, tenderness, and being emotional, kind, helpful, devoted, and understanding have been cited as stereotypically feminine. I think most people regardless of gender and preference want their SO to be empathetic, helpfulness, cooperativeness, but are men pur…
I might be wrong this, but aren't most FDS'ers transphobic? If so, they definitely won't break into mainstream Twitter unless they hide their power level.
This is a rather weak argument. Firstly, using 'normal' and 'natural' in this context are just an appeal to nature. Secondly, you likely can be attracted to people (assuming they meet your other usual criterias) that have traits or do things that are considered unhealthy such as people who happen to smoke cigarettes or have scoliosis
They don't want to actually get into a serious relationship—they just want their free meal. See this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/d1mpsx/how_to_never_ever_pay_on_a_date/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf And comments like these: https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/d1mpsx/how_to_never_ever_pay_on_a_date/ezp2ag5/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf They all have hundreds of upvotes and are clearly encourgaing em…
r/gendercritical are radfems; r/feminism is libfem. They don't really like each other. I don't see much libfems here (there are a lot of neutral women, but I haven't seen one who uses libfem talking points.)
You don't think FDS'ers encouraging dating men just to get free meals coupled with manipulation tactics to get them to pay isn't emotional manipulation?
You forgot the people who always reply snarkily. Don't get me wrong, I love reading a bit of snarkiness. But when every post is snarky, it gets kind of annoying.
Intersectionalists are just regular (not radical) feminists no? I'd think that when radicialized, feminists ride the "i wish moids were genocided" and anti-trans train.
I don't know about that claim. In my "State your gender, pill, and political ideology", half of red-pillers were libertarians and the other half were conservatives. Alt-right is a bit extreme.
Do you think civilization would not collapse if your removed the majority of women? Removing 25%+ of the people from Earth is pretty likely to make civilization collapse.
Yes, I agree that bringing up a relatively large volume of threads can prove biases in subreddits, but just grabbing a low traffic thread changing the genders then calling for a crusade is illogical.
TBH, this is kind of unfair - it's likely not the same people replying to those posts. Maybe those same people tell the woman she's an asshole and vice versa.
