TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SS2James Archive

View 12 posts and 212 comments by SS2James on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Feminism is simply invented and exaggerated victimhood. The funny thing is that it's pretty much just the latest form of chivalry and "benevolent sexism" that has defined gender politics for thousands of years. Before it was simple things like "women and children first" and doing the hard labor so women don't have to, now it's the ability to have a man financially support you against their will while not allowing them to even see their children. The more things change, the more they stay the sam…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:36 AM
3

Maybe I'll look around for "dad" circles, it's worth a shot.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:24 AM
6

I'm a stay at home dad with a one year old girl. I know how important it is for her to socialize but I dread having to think about joining any "mom" circles.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 12:15 AM
2

Wild land fire fighter to be specific....
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:03 AM
2

Welp, agree to disagree I guess... I speak through my actions and words, not which group I claim I belong to. By that logic, I'm a feminist, MRA, animal activist, Humanitarian, smartass, dumbass, fine-ass, anarchist, libertarian, hero,(yes I've been called that many times, not just because I was a fire fighter, but other things I've done) But I claim none of those things personally. I've just been called them because of my actions and words.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:03 AM
4

Not to me, I've followed this ideal for a while. Once you apply such labels to yourself (or others), it will begin to define you more than you define yourself. If I called myself an MRA, people immediately think I'm a rape apologist and I hate women. Neither are true so I don't call myself anything and I define my beliefs individually, lest people become confused. "Keep your oppressive labels off me bro..."
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:14 AM
5

He does say ANY other kind of "-ist", so yes, he is rejecting all "isms".
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:49 AM
4

I don't see what context would change the message of what he's saying here.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:39 AM
5

There's about 1 female for every 30 males in fire fighting. The generalization is accurate.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:37 AM
9

If she's already broken up with the guy, that only makes it worse that she would damage his property.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 11:32 PM
1

God forbid women ever ask for help, god forbid a woman isn't so insecure that she has to describe herself as "alpha".
/r/MensRights25/06/13 12:45 AM
3

Your music sucks, J-Lo...
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:01 AM
3

Ok dude, keep trying to justify your idiocy. My joke pertained to alimony specifically, I brought up examples where even men got millions from alimony laws, sorry it was "gendered" but it makes sense in the context of the thread. You also never came up with an actual rebuttal to the fact that single mothers do make up the majority of Americans under the poverty line - not conforming to the shoddy joke you posted about expensive shoes. I don't need to make a rebuttal to something I never disagree…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:54 AM
4

/u/contract_ is really dumb. Don't waste too much time on him. Had a spat here where the thread was about alimony and he brought up stats about never married single moms as some sort of argument, which lead me to believe he didn't know the difference between alimony and child support. I think he's just really confused.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:22 AM
5

Dude, you just sit on the computer typing angry comments all day. If you have so much angry energy why, don't you do something about it and take it to the streets? Because you aren't accomplishing more than that guy by doing the same thing as him, redditing.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:16 AM
2

I upvote this because even though these guys are rude on here, they are REAL AND RAW, and call out feminist BS in some of the most satisfactory ways. Hey Manhood, I'm poor, let me have a scholarship.... I'm like the only redditor I've ever seen who publicly supports you.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:34 AM
4

I almost poe'd out.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 10:57 PM
10

Oh good, you don't. Glad we cleared that up. Do you think GWW knows what it's like to be a man more then me, an actual man? Probably, but I doubt she thinks that. I'm just a third party observer in that situation.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 01:35 AM
13

Nope, I asked you first. Do you think you know what it's like to be a woman more than GWW, an actual woman? Just answer the question, it's simple.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 01:18 AM
15

She knows what it's like to be a Latino woman more than you do, idiot... SHE'S A WOMAN. It's simple: Do you think you know what it's like to be a woman more than GWW, an actual woman and mother? It's a simple question deserving of a simple answer.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:48 AM
15

So you're saying that you, as a man, know more about the experiences of being a woman than an actual woman. Got it.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:26 AM
11

FUCK, you're so indoctrinated by feminist propaganda, I'm not even going to bother to reply because there's no point. It's like all the worst parts of SRS and tumblr copy pasted together. I will touch on this though: Privilege which may or may not make her blind to the experiences of other men and women. Simply by virtue of her being a woman (let alone her sexual orientation) she is FAR more aware of the experiences of women than you are. Her experiences trump yours according to your own ideolog…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:04 AM
30

You stalk GWW. You think the word crazy is misandric. You imply ableism is bad then compare having ADD to being mentally unfit. There are actually people out there who claim that kids with add are actually far more brighter and absorb information faster than regular children, so they need physical stimulation to keep from losing focus. When asked if you're insulted by being called a woman, you say that it is because society considers women to be less valuable. Which doesn't make sense because ca…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 10:52 PM
41

Wow, if people didn't think you were crazy before, they do now.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 10:22 PM
3

The idea of the study is good, but it's basically just a tool for indoctrination at this point, like you said. I mean just look at the nutcases at the University of Toronto...
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:09 PM
6

Definitely they are. According to the arrest affidavit, she was 18 while the girl was 14, they went into a public school bathroom and the older one fingered the younger one. http://www.scribd.com/doc/142642135/Kaitlyn-Hunt-Redacted-Affidavit-Redacted This wouldn't hold up in court no matter what gender or sexual orientation of those involved. 14 is considered pretty damn young in most circles, and it also disqualifies her from Romeo and Juliet laws.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:24 AM
41

Against men's rights? Talk about hate groups... Jeez.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:19 AM
2

Which is why I wish feminist groups like N.O.W. would stop vilifying fathers on a state by state basis.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 06:58 PM
2

Stay at home dad who used to be a wildland fire fighter here. What you say is pretty much exactly true. Sometimes I actually miss the hard work, but then I realize I just need to go for a run or do some push-ups.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:33 AM
27

That's what methamphetamines do to people.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 09:54 PM
53

My mother performed live sex shows in front of me and my 4 younger siblings, I called the police 3 times and CPS 2 times before anything was done.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 08:22 PM
5

Wow, this is legit scary.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 03:54 AM
1

Yeah, I just wanted to amend it by saying that the pamphlet is still a bit insulting, even if there is an air of truth behind it.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:14 PM
2

This is my issue: I definitely agree that men want sex more than women, you'd have to be in denial to not see that. I think the problem is this pamphlet is far too restrictive. Guys ALSO want a relationship, girls ALSO want sex. It's pretty restrictive and pigeonholes the sexes. Men do want sex more than women though.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:01 PM
2

Can you all at least admit that guys want sex MORE than women? I mean, everything backs up that assertion. Men and women both want sex and relationships, but we need to admit that men and women are different in this regard. This pamphlet far too absolute. But science says that men want sex more than women.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:56 PM
1

Yeah, but this is about trends, and stats. So...
/r/MensRights06/05/13 12:09 AM
2

I had an abusive single mom who abused drugs and basically forced me to care for my 4 younger siblings. I'm so suprised at how well I turned out. One of my younger brothers just went to jail for meth abuse and credit fraud though :(
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:58 PM
2

Oh c'mon, criticism of feminism doesn't equate to "bashing women". That's some SRS logic there. And I don't know if you realize this, but certain feminist organizations are the main opposition to the MRM. http://imgur.com/3JntXqJ http://youtu.be/iARHCxAMAO0
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:48 PM
0

Yes, seriously. I love boobies as well.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:37 AM
1

Sensationalism means page views these days, they'll be on the same level as Jezebel and Kotaku if they continue down this road.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:20 PM
3

If you can't see why they wouldn't allow refutations on the same page than you're lost.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:36 PM
3

I don't want the conversation below this article to invalidate my own position so I have shut down the conversation all together. You can send me an E-mail if you want but I probably will never respond but even if I did I would never give it credit publicly due to the way I have reacted to such refutations in the past. Trust me, I read it. And yeah, it's as ironic as everything else concerning modern feminism in America.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:23 PM
3

The comments are shut down, is anyone surprised that pseudo-intellectual feminist views like this are hard to defend?
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:14 AM
3

Please show me where he wrote the phrase "women are defective / stupid if they don't want to have children". If you can't do that then congratulations, you misrepresented what he said.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:17 AM
1

I've repeated numerous time that people are entitled to their opinion, my contention is that youre misrepresenting what Rogan said in the first place...
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:14 AM
2

Someone not wanting kids is considered the same as "not liking" kids. What? Now you're just making shit up. You can like things and not want them. You can like dogs but not want a dog, you can like pizza but not want pizza (cause it's bad for you or something).
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:12 AM
1

Neoteny is a very interesting subject. GWW did a good video on it and how it relates to feminism.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:09 AM
1

Rogan never said that not wanting kids is wrong, he said not liking kids is wrong.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:04 AM
1

Opinion, yes. Facts, no. Huh? People are entitled to their opinion but not entitled to facts? The fact is no one is forcing you to have kids, so why hate on them when you aren't forced to have them?
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:03 AM
1

Then leave if you don't like opposing views. I still don't see where he said not wanting children is bad. I see "not liking children" and "Hating children", no "not wanting children."
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:00 AM
0

Welp, everyone's entitled to their opinion....
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:49 AM
1

My thoughts exactly. It's creepy how much Totenglocke42 seems to dislike children when no one is forcing him to have any. ^^<sup>probably</sup> ^^<sup>better</sup> ^^<sup>if</sup> ^^<sup>he</sup> ^^<sup>doesn't.</sup>
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:47 AM
0

I hate assholes who bash people for not wanting to fuck up their lives by having kids. Again, he said "There's nothing wrong with not wanting children." Pure opinion with no factual basis. Maybe the cute part, but they are in fact little people. Right you mean how (taking a guess on your age, could be wrong) you treated your kids wonderfully by fucking them with massive debt and a shit economy to grow up in? Actually poverty and world hunger are at an all time low, it's the best time in recorded…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:41 AM
0

You sound really hateful. Why do you hate children? They're just cute little people. And they're the future of our world so you better treat them nicely.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:25 AM
0

Well, not all of them are feminists of course. But I'm willing to bet that most of them are, who else spends their time telling telling some guy they are offended at said guy's opinion?
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:10 AM
1

They don't like men unless they are subservient to feminism...
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:04 AM
0

People have a right to be pissed at him, just like he has a right to an opinion, no matter how controversial. EDIT: He did clarify that it's fine if you don't want kids, the issue is if you hate kids. Which I agree, kids are people too. It's like saying "I hate blacks." or "I hate women".
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:03 AM
6

Feminists tend to view any opposing opinion as an MRA opinion these days.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:25 AM
5

Why does MR not correct these ignoramuses who say such bullshit? Who says they don't? Just because MRAs don't constantly troll reddit looking to be offended doesn't mean they are condoning this notion. This isn't SRS, MRAs focus on things outside of reddit.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:27 AM
5

Why do people everywhere do that? It's not just "redditors".
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:13 AM
11

Usually people on here have a base knowledge of these things. I don't intend to spend much time digging up a bunch of articles for you... but here's some starting points: http://youtu.be/lvAOeZCYFyY http://youtu.be/iARHCxAMAO0 and here's the lecture thay were protesting: http://youtu.be/P6w1S8yrFz4
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:45 PM
5

Feminists protested warren Farrell in Toronto, you didn't hear about that? Also I've just met many feminists who vilify summers. Feminists sent threats to Erin Pizzey.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:02 PM
29

Of course, make things hard for the men to benefit women, and once women have the capacity to do the same they want to put shit on easy mode again. Strong independent women indeed....
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:42 PM
7

You answered your own question, because they are egalitarians and not feminists, they don't focus entirely on gathering ever more rights for women so they are vilified by "true" feminists.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:33 PM
4

These femen feminists are part of a pretty large movement, the online rad fem movement is huge as well, feminists on my campus were similar. These feminists are the majority in my experience, whole heatedly believing an unfalsifiable theory does that to people sometimes.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:31 PM
1

April Fools....
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:43 PM
1

If I'm understanding correctly, it seems the "Benevolent sexism" some of us already know is the feminist defined version that basically translates to "white knighting". They just spun the term around to make any womanly advantage be seen as "sexism". That's how I originally first heard of it at least. The one being talked about here is a different version which is basically just anyone who acknowledges value in gender roles, i.e. men who want to be "in charge" of a relationship, etc. I don't eve…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/13 04:54 AM
3

Just like Anita shouldn't be listened to.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:10 AM
2

Read: Jack Thompson
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:21 PM
5

A bunch of women that you have sex with
/r/TheRedPill26/03/13 07:47 AM
2

Thank you for your answers.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:33 AM
6

Why, in your opinion, are the men more likely to have managerial positions and are paid more in such a female oriented field?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:31 AM
9

Thunderf00t nails it again. Good comment: As a woman in tech I can't help but wonder how many otherwise nice guys have been made suspicious of us by Adria's stupid stunt. I haven't encountered much misogyny (though I am probably alone in not counting the equivalent of 3rd grade fart jokes misogyny), but I sure have encountered a reluctance on men's parts to treat me as one of the group for fear that they would offend me. Fortunately I have a sense of humor and guys eventually realize they can r…
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:20 AM
2

I don't really do it to try and change the extremist's mind, I do it to influence readers who might be on the fence about such issues and ideologies.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 08:56 PM
3

Eh, that's where you and me differ I guess. I think proposing counter arguments and different views on narratives that are asserted by feminists is important. They are at the level now where they are teaching college courses and being paid by the government, and they should be held to the same scrutiny that other academic fields and political positions are. It's no secret that some aspects of feminism work against men. There deserves to be a counter argument to everything, even things as mundane…
/r/MensRights16/03/13 06:35 AM
4

It should be about debunking them though.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 04:38 AM
3

Your best explanation as to why men hold the vast majority of leadership positions across basically all fields is because women simply haven't earned them? No one's stepped up? You act as if women are sitting at home, expecting leadership to show up at their front door. That couldn't possibly be farther from the truth. No, I was strictly speaking about political positions, of which women are fairly well represented http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_elected_or_appointed_female_heads_of_state I…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:41 AM
4

it's looking at positions with the most power. Here's the thing, and I'm going to be real with you. Women have to earn those positions, and in many countries they already have (Australia, United Kingdom, Brazil, Germany, etc.) That's the whole basis for why feminism's flawed, because it's striving for power without the responsibility. If women put themselves in a man's position, they should be able to handle it. and the way to assure they can handle it is by letting them earn it. That's why it's…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:10 AM
5

NAFALT!
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:00 AM
17

That made me sick to my stomach.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:05 AM
2

Access to porn is negatively correlated with incidence of rape. That's a good point, but even though Lukas wasn't confident at first and missed some opportunities, I still think she came out on top just by the reactions of everyone else. The two moments that stuck out to me was when Sterba said "When men are more cautious, women have more rights" or something. And the moderator just said "Ok..." and some people in the audience laughed. He kinda just sounded non-nonsensical at that point. Then th…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:41 AM
0

She actually did a good job if you ask me, I'd say she won.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/13 08:09 PM
1

Eh, I'm just saying it it could be argued, not that I would argue that personally.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/13 08:06 PM
-1

I said it could be argued, not that I would actually arguing for that.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:05 PM
2

If you can get through the first 25 minutes of Dr. Sterba, Lukas makes some much more specific and less broad, vague and sweeping arguments. It's easy to get caught up in his rhetoric as he appeals to emotion, but she brings up specific arguments and actual occurrences that bring to light the problems that feminism has caused. Feminism has done great things in the past and you can even argue it's been flawless for about a century, but there are clear bias' happening now that more women are assum…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/13 10:12 AM
0

If you can get through the first 25 minutes of Dr. Sterba, Lukas makes some much more specific and less broad, vague and sweeping arguments. It's easy to get caught up in his rhetoric as he appeals to emotion, but she brings up specific arguments and actual occurrences that bring to light the problems that feminism has caused. Feminism has done great things in the past and you can even argue it's been flawless for about a century, but there are clear bias' happening now that more women are assum…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:06 AM
1

Eh, I disagree with so many points, but everyone is different so I respect your opinion.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:30 AM
0

It's obvious you don't have children, I do. I'm the stay at home dad. My wife is gone FAR MORE than 40 hours a week. and she is till getting plenty of time with her daughter. But guess what? She would be seeing less of both of us if I worked, Because we would have to start paying for childcare, scheduling pickups working out our own schedules. We both would just be so tired that neither of us would be able to put all of our effort into raising a kid along with doing diaper laundery, dinner, yard…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:07 AM
1

In short, women need to provide too, so that men can get time with their kids. That's not what's happening, when a mother works it doesn't automatically mean the father gets to work less, in fact that is rare. Either one parent stays home, or someone else is watching your kids for you. People are working out of necessity. You know what usually happens when both parents are working? Divorce. And that's far more damaging than not seeing you father for 40 hours a week. People need to understand tha…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:13 AM
1

Yep, its good for the government and businesses, bad for families and individuals.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:06 AM
0

Straight up personal opinion dissociated with the MRM: Both men and women have different strengths and feminists are just jealous of the capacity of men. Unless hilary is talking abouit putting women on the frontlines in war than she's being sexist by blaming men for women's weaknesses. Men and women are supposed to rely on eachother for different things, not compete with each other for the same things.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:06 PM
7

Actaully since women have joined the workforce, wages stopped going up and instead of women getting paid the same as men, men are getting paid the way women do, if you follow me. This isn't the fault of women or feminists though, this is an issue with how capitalism works in our country. Back in the 60s a guy could be a bagger at a grocery store, insure his whole family, and own a house. Now everyone is competing with each other for shit paying jobs. But in real terms, the study found, women sti…
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:15 PM
0

That was the audience clapping, not the "panel" there were only 3 people on the panel.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:05 PM
5

And yet SRS (who can beconsidered separate from reddit) has done most of the doxxing damage as well, you think skepchick or adrien chen would acknowledge SRS branded damage? No. This is a one sided issue for anyone with a brain. It was a transparent reddit smear campaign because feminists don't like reddit because it's a platform for open discussion, and feminists HATE that because their ideology revolves around lies and urban myths..
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:05 PM
0

Apparently you don't understand tropes, or videogame cliches, or understand what the fuck Anita Sarkeesian or anyone else is even doing here.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:45 PM
-1

A damsel in distress, the ratings and negative feedback is just too much for her to take. God forbid anyone think that dying hundreds of times over to save the royal princess might actually be far more damaging to men if you really think about it. There are more reasonable explanations for all of her criticisms regardless and she knows that her whole video can be dismantled in one sentence.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:32 AM
70

That's the thing, Allan Schaaf was stating facts and figures for the things reddit has done, like charities and gift giving programs. She knew that she has just a few citations from random trolls on the Internet, and there really is no actual quantifiable damage for what reddit has done. It's all just smoke and mirrors with these media feminists, they have to play off people's emotions and media hysteria to get anywhere, it's all slander and smear campaigns. Dirty business being a writer for Gaw…
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:13 AM
27

Men's rights has always been critical of dubious feminist behavior. There was no one that panel besides people who obviously want to see reddit go away. Something strange happened in the booking for this "panel" and it all just seems fishy to me.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:05 AM
4

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/19vd7q/its_out_damsel_in_distress_part_1_tropes_vs_women/c8rnfhc I like this guy's take on it, essentially if you internalize these tropes they're bad for both gender's. But who the fuck is doing that? These are stories about fantastical a far away settings. She's wasting her time acting as if such common plot devices have any real world consequences. I don't think the trope "saving x person" or " saving x girl" should be eliminated, saving a life is m…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:28 AM
21

I'm not a victim, and yes, I'm accusing feminists of pulling the alarm to shut down a talk that's critical of feminism.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:22 AM
18

The trend that feminists try to keep differing opinions from being heard. It happened last time and it happened again. http://youtu.be/iARHCxAMAO0
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:18 AM
15

Just making an educated guess based on previous trends.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:16 AM
23

It wasn't censored, it was an attempt to stop the talk from happening but it failed because those feminists are dumb.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:14 AM
21

Why was it pulled at the end of the talk, after the questions were asked, if it was to silence the talk? Uhm... what? "Fire alarm pulled at U of T talk two minutes before it began."
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:11 AM
20

It's pretty great. If people weren't convinced there was a problem before, they better believe now.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:30 AM
17

http://equalitycanada.com/2013/02/25/upcoming-event-whats-wrong-with-womens-studies-academic-feminism-censorship-men/
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:57 AM
5

My mom has read hundreds of those fucking things. And millions of women read 50 shades of grey as well so that "power fantasy" shit is such a blatant derailment.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:35 AM
2

"It's a man's power fantasy" or some shit.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:31 AM
6

Being "problematic" isn't "doing well", it disrupts teamwork, and affects other people's ability to do their job correctly.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:38 AM
3

There's an example right in the OP dude...
/r/MensRights28/02/13 05:47 AM
3

This guy has something to say about it: http://youtu.be/VjNJX64cBOE
/r/MensRights28/02/13 05:25 AM
4

People with strict adherences to dogmatic ideologies don't do well in tech and science based fields.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 05:03 AM
4

The dude is probably older than most of us though. He was talking about Johnny Carson for a bit.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/13 01:04 AM
11

The keyword is "most". There are good women out there, I'm married to one, she even nodded her head when Bill was like "and GOOD women know what I'm talking about.." But yeah, most women act like children, throwing fits of rage when their feelings are hurt or they don't get their way. Feminism is basically a female temper tantrum embodied in a social movement.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/13 10:36 PM
4

This is a situation I'm in. I feel like there's a crisis with single parents (mostly mothers) in this country, and I won't let it happen to my flesh and blood. I have a daughter... I'm going to teach her that decent men know how to be a leader while also being kind and understanding. I'm going to make sure that she knows that men and women are supposed to complement each other rather than compete with each other, while at the same time teaching her how to be self reliant and independent when she…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:09 AM
2

This will haunt him unless he says the right thing about it. Granted this interview is like 40 years old, and also I understand what his point is here, but it's just going to delegitimize him in the long run.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:31 AM
0

Ooo, angsty... You're perfect.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:08 AM
0

I don't want to talk about your dick bro...
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:01 AM
2

Cool, so your comment serves no purpose other than to tell people your opinion about your own circumcised penis. Glad you're not speaking for all men.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:56 AM
10

I am satisfied with my circumcision, I prefer it this way looks-wise. That's cool bro, but you don't speak for all men. We have the right to bodily autonomy and the right to choose what happens to our body even if we "don't remember it".
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:36 AM
11

Are you stupid or just a feminist? Marriage by it's very definition implies monogamy, ie. Women (and men) aren't supposed to cheat if they're married. How does your sentence even relate to the topic? Stupid ass professional victims....
/r/TheRedPill16/02/13 08:29 AM
2

You know why....
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:05 AM
3

Actually feminism is a pretty big deal in india.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:10 PM
2

Yeah, feminism and women not having responsibility is pretty far along in india. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7lfVyyEI70
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:09 PM
1

Ugh, sorry, on my phone.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:18 PM
1

I agree, I didn't mean to derail. I just think tje pullen might be a but more nuanced that patriarchy allows for.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:17 PM
5

I would like to hear what she actually said. But if she was simply repeating the same patriarchy theory then shes not doing it right.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:09 PM
8

Yeah its f'd for women there, but sometime women and their families will use acid on the men aswell. So I think theres still a cultural problem where the answer doesn't revolve around "men are evil". EDIT: Ohh... India actually seems farther along the feminism spectrum than America, they have women only train cars, they have that game show where men go to get emasculated. Please debate me on this FEMINISM CREATES RAPE CULTURE, FEMINISM CREATES SINGLE WOMEN PARENTS.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:58 PM
10

I'm not going to comment on the validity of feminism being a nation wide shit-test. But I just had the same "woah" feeling that I did when I first learned what the shit-test was in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:38 AM
1

I do respect women, that's why I'm anti-feminist because THEY don't respect women.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:02 AM
8

As if he doesn't know it's wrong to kidnap -_- He's gonna do it regardless ladies...
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:44 AM
3

That wouldn't make the Israeli government very happy, so I doubt that'll happen.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 10:12 PM
1

I realize that. I'm just saying that any educated person can tell you that people can still get aids even if they're circumcised.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 10:10 PM
6

As if that wasn't common sense before.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 09:35 PM
1

Have you not been seeing our attempts of raising awareness getting shut down? It's on the front page right now. It's hard to raise awareness about anything gender related when it's essentially becoming an industry that feels threatened by anyone who doesn't want to join them. They're even trying to change the meaning of certain words entirely and suppress any other definitions that may conflict with the definition that benefits them most.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:13 AM
1

Yeah, I know. Theyre shitheads.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:25 PM
5

Relevant comment from an SRSter.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 09:52 AM
6

It's not because I and several of my friends are deep trolls doing the exact same thing you're doing right now. People like you and me are making it seem like feminism is just a bunch of subjective B.S. that puts ideology before evidence. It's working wonders if you look around you. Feminist is now synonymous with "uneducated person with a victim complex" here on reddit and it's quite humorous to be honest. Keep it up!
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:03 AM
7

Yes, I already know that SRS is filled to the brim with trolls trying to make feminism look bad. You can keep replying if you want to further prove this point.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:39 AM
14

Yeah, you're clearly out of your element... because you have not idea what the hell you're talking about.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:20 PM
15

I think MRAs going their own way is probably good for society as a whole. This is what you said, don't back pedal. I was saying there are MRAs who are suspicious of women and angry about their career choices and they shouldn't inflict themselves upon those women. No where does it say they are "inflicting themselves" on these women, they're saying they AVOID these women. Which is their right to seek whatever type of woman they want.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:03 PM
38

You were implying that if MRAs left the gene pool it would be good. You're saying that anyone who believes in protecting the rights of men should not procreate. Hence you are against men's rights. It shouldn't be this hard to have a dialogue, but then again you're clearly out of your element.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:20 PM
34

Well now you're just trolling. It's too bad you had nothing to bring to this conversation, just another SRSter giving feminism a bad name huh?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:13 PM
34

If you actually had any anything meaningful to say you would overlook the typo and answer the question.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:56 PM
46

Sorry, already had a kid and in a loving relationship for 8 years, don't need to be married for that SRShitlord.... Why don't you think men deserve rights? EDIT: Fixed typo.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:47 PM
8

We both agree that it would probably ruin what we already have.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:25 AM
8

I'm in an 8 year relationship and we have a daughter. I still have no intention of getting married.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:27 AM
3

I definitely believe that the law should never be sexist. If the boy or his parents want to press charges they should be allowed and the law should treat the perpetrator the same as if it were a man. What I don't get is why this article isn't focusing on the real issue of all women getting reduced sentencing for the same crime a man commits. It almost seems as if it's cleverly written to be a troll. I might be wearing a tin-foil hat right now but I don't like the way the article, or the title of…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:44 AM
6

It's definitely on the decline, i don't know if it well ever fully go away until gender studies are reworked in our colleges. Patriarchy theory needs to be trashed in my opinion.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:41 AM
1

I can't wait...
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:29 AM
1

When we talk about feminism we're talking about rad feminism. Unfortunately mainstream feminism usually IS rad feminism.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:50 PM
6

Let's try not to give people like this traffic. Sure it's fun to dismantle fallacious arguments but sometimes they knowingly write inflammatory articles just for hits, similar to Jezebel.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:29 AM
7

You have no idea how true this is becoming.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:46 AM
17

Sorry, the motive for both you and SRS is proof enough. The video makes them look REALLY bad. I tagged you because you have posted in SRS before, you may have just deleted your comment but that doesn't change the fact that you have posted in an SRS related subreddit before.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:57 PM
6

Radical feminism is a current perspective within feminism that focuses on the theory of patriarchy as a system of power that organizes society into a complex of relationships based on the assertion that male supremacy oppresses women.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:44 PM
23

A. You're in a men's rights subreddit defending a radical feminist subreddit. B. I got you tagged as SRS, you tell me why?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:42 PM
23

Please keep trying to defend SRS's honor... it's absolutely hilarious how insecure you are about your own group.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:32 PM
18

Oh hey SRS!!
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:17 PM
26

Speak for yourself buddy, I've been showing everyone I can this video exposing radical fems as a hate group. Just by posting in this sub we've helped make this become news. We've all helped even if it was just minute.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:05 PM
15

Of course, no matter what they'll play the victim, even in matters that have NOTHING to do with them. It's their ideology to lie, misdirect, exaggerate, and ignore all in the name of victimhood.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:47 PM
4

My theory is that most MRAs started off as feminists but changed when they realized how anti-intellectual feminism is. Spot on, exactly how it was for me.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:57 PM
6

Here's the way I see it, 98% of all t.v. is pretty meaningless drivel designed to appeal to as many people as possible. Basically, it's mostly quite stupid to be frank. Commercials are like Stupid10. It's designed to keep us in a narrow paradigm so they can try to keep us all as similar as possible. It's a story for the typical family living within their respective gender roles. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, the man sleeps and is lazy because he is assumedly has to be the one to go out and w…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:26 AM
9

Thanks for doing this ErasmusMRA. With all the crap that happens here in America and Canada, it's easy to forget that this type of thing happens in non-western cultures as well.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:58 AM
1

I couldn't have put it better myself.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:08 AM
1

Are those the same 20 cops that build up the wall of silence and refuse to turn in the violent power-tripping pigs in their ranks? And protect and lie for them? Probably not. There are hundreds if not thousands of cops in that city. Different districts and departments and everything. Yeah, I have been alive for too long and dealt with too many cops to believe that lie we were taught when we were children. Tell me kiddo, how do you know that is true? Oh I don't know, common sense? And please don'…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:05 AM
12

Don't be an idiot. Cops are public servants, and for every one that gets videotaped abusing their power there are 20 who genuinely do good by the people.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:39 AM
1

No, most people saying this are just repeating jokes they see on /r/gaming, sure there might be some of that here and there but I've been playing Halo 4 everyday since it came out and haven't heard any "faggots" or "niggers", just a couple "that's bullshit"'s. It's just Hyperbole. EDIT: The people who harassed Anita were mainly from 4chan...
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:42 AM
0

Probably wouldn't have made that much money but would have still been harassed.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:46 AM
2

I'll simply agree to disagree. I think if it was a man making the exact same videos, the response would have been the same.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:18 PM
-1

It has nothing to do with her being a woman, it had to do with the content of her videos and the obvious pandering for money.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:01 PM
17

I got the impression myself that feminism, as a movement, is running out of enemies. Western society has been HEAVILY affected by the feminism imperative. I’ve personally studied the history of feminism at the university level, so I know for a fact that most of the recommendations of the feminism movement from the 70′s and the 80′s have entered into political policy. There movement has arguably been as successful as it could have been. This hit the nail on the head for me.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:55 AM
5

I was confused for a minute because you actually never hear feminists say most of these. They sounded more like MRA comments to me, then I realized the brilliant humor of the video. Also, the guy has an awesome accent.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:13 AM
2

The video's been removed from /r/videos for being "too political". It's been reposted here: http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/14af45/students_at_university_of_toronto_protest_warren/
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:55 AM
5

It's been reposted here: http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/14af45/students_at_university_of_toronto_protest_warren/ Hopefully it get's some exposure.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:39 AM
2

I think a certain group of radical feminists spammed the report button on it or something.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:29 AM
-3

I usually don't approve of memes here but this actually gave me a light chuckle.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:53 PM
8

I have a sister who had one, I used that box with a hot light bulb in it more than she did. I ate tiny ass brownies all day long.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:59 AM
1

Maybe its your use of grammar, but they "they" obviously mean gay women. I absolutely DO NOT mean gay women... I meant anyone who is already spreading disinformation about us in reference to the OP's assertions, specifically radical feminists and SRS. I'm sorry you misinterpreted my comment, but "they" was only referring to the people who spread hateful rhetoric about us without doing some research into what we actually want. I'm all for gay marriage and equal rights...
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:31 PM
1

What? I never implied that I was excluding anyone, if there is a man in your life that you care about, the MRM welcomes you.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:54 PM
6

I personally think there is a use for it, but in it's current state? No. The whole thing needs a massive revision.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:56 AM
2

Might not get the best reaction here because we like to ignore SRS. You should post it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsucks If you don't, I will because they would love this.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:53 AM
6

It's nice but it goes against Patriarchy theory and the notion of rape culture. Feminists are probably lambasting this as we speak. EDIT: I don't believe in Patriarchy theory or rape culture (as feminists define it), I'm just saying this doesn't jive with their ideology.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:23 AM
41

Gay men's rights ARE men's rights already. Anyone who honestly believes that men's rights is a hate group is an idiot and frankly, I don't give a shit about trying to prove anything to them because no matter how LGTB/women friendly we are they will still try to spread those lies about us. Gay men are still men and they should try to align with us, because we're already on their side.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:24 PM
5

HA! Ok, I got confused there. I was wondering why you were telling me this and not the comment I was responding to. Thanks for clearing that up. Keep fighting the good fight brother.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:22 PM
10

Hey man, you're preaching to the choir on this one. I was framing my comment it in a way culturally_lost could be sympathetic to because I wanted an actual response so i can begin to reveal to her what you're telling me here. I've done my research and totally agree that Patriarchy theory is BS and conducive to hate. Don't worry, I'm 100% awake about these issues. I like to slowly reveal to these people the truth about their own movement in a diplomatic way.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:10 PM
18

I would be embarrassed and ashamed if people like this were representing my movement. Why don't more feminists start opposing radical feminism? It's clearly damaging the social perception of feminism at large. You can keep shouting "NAFALT" all you want but until you start purging this venom from feminism, people will continue to be swayed over to the opinion that it's a hate movement.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:45 PM
1

It's strongly implied, during the dream scene where it's supposedly taking place, you can hear a women making sensual noises in the background. Then you wake up with her topless on top of you and I recall actually hearing a wet suction sound when she dismounts.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:15 AM
1

I got to the part referred to in your OP, and during that crazy fight in dream land you can hear her making sex noises in the background. So yeah, you were basically date raped by her. Just wanted to follow up.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:11 AM
8

I like how when girls cheat the guy just dumps her and moves on but when the guy cheats the girl becomes all petty, breaks personal property, doesn't fucking move on, and is permanently scarred. Yes, I'm talking in generalities, you don't need to tell me I'm generalizing because I already know that I am. I'm simply talking about the tendencies I've been witness to for decades.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:05 AM
2

Because feminism is only concerned about the betterment women (sometimes at men's expense) and many are like /u/ShockScapes and think that it's not possible for men to be oppressed by men. They downplay male oppression because they're afraid that it will delegitimize feminism. They try to say that only men can oppress women and women can never oppress men, which is false. Sometimes feminism actually fights against men's rights. Also, the whole concept of "Patriarchy" is an unfalsifiable theory t…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:47 PM
2

Awe man, didn't mean to read the spoiler. Oh well I'm not mad. There seems to be a strange duality in this game between the cheesy dialogue of the rich white kids, and the dark spirituality of the rakyat. There seems to be something brilliant going on in this game and I hope I'm not just imagining things. But if I had to guess, I would say that the main protagonist (you) will be revealed to be a schizophrenic or something. Don't tell me if I'm right or wrong, I'm going to play more now.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:08 PM
0

Men cannot oppress other men. Just summarizing your logic so people can see how dumb you are.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:58 AM
-1

Too bad the ones that agree don't make themselves known. Just about every feminist I meet here on reddit tells me I'm a rape and pedo apologist. Then tell me that even if men did have problems in our law system that feminism is taking care of it already. Unfortunately it seems the opposite is true.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:22 AM
-4

Are you seriously trying to say that the "Patriarchy" (modern society) and gender roles, and sexist family court laws doesn't harm men? You might want to do some more research.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:36 AM
1

That guy isn't very well spoken and curses a lot, I'm thinking that his ban isn't just because he's an MRA. I could be wrong though.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:15 AM
0

Semantics...
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:53 AM
1

I'm on my phone now but I well say that three is definitely a culture based on fear in america.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:35 AM
2

Also, I think we should recognize social work and teaching professions as intrinsically valuable/important and reward them as such. Agree whole heartedly I've mentioned in this sub before that I too have dabbled in social work this semester... I did not find those attitudes towards male students at all. Yeah, I'm sure it's better in some places than others. Just as a small nitpick though.. I'm assuming that you area woman from your account name. If you are a woman, I would certainly contend that…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:10 AM
2

Typically, physically demanding jobs are also more dangerous. I was a wildland fire fighter for several years and the only time when the job actually seemed worth the money was when we were actually on a fire line, quickly felling large trees which were on fire or about to be on fire. This is due to OT and Hpay (Overrtime and Hazard pay) which would double and even triple our base pay, which was about 10-13 per hour for base level fuels crews. Getting paid more for more dangerous jobs is legit i…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:53 PM
10

A lot of women are incapable of meeting the high physical demands of the job. Wouldn't this be a physical disadvantage and not a societal one? No matter how much our society changes, men will still be more physically capable than women. I'm not trying to be argumentative but I don't see what can be done about the example you mentioned.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:51 PM
11

Throughout history woman have had to work harder than men. lol
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:21 AM
2

For things like vehicles and homes as well.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 11:17 PM
12

The only privileges that actually mean anything are geographic location and wealth.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:51 AM
12

Hey man, if women can deny they have privilege then everyone can.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:39 AM
28

No, that would be called a crime fighting hero.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:24 PM
1

Tries way too hard... but I chuckled once or twice.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:50 PM
36

This needs to be at the top. I'm so sick and tired of feminists pulling out random stats like it proves something. 9 times out of 10 even if the stat does come from a reliable source with proper sample size etc, their assertion that it's "patriarchy" or whatever is noncausal at best.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:37 AM
0

I don't blame you.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:34 AM
4

Read it, sounds like a hate speech to me.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:17 AM
19

It's because out of all the people who are "blind to their own privilege", these people are the blindest. Seriously.. read the article! This is what what modern feminism is about: to recap, feminism — the real kind, radical feminism — is about women. not men. somehow we have gone off the rails into extensive theorizing jerking of knees about men, HOWEVER this theorizing seems to be based on a fundamental misunderstanding (or intentional derail, whevs) of radical feminist philosophy, which is tha…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:17 AM
11

"It's so funny how society can easily manipulate every woman ever for thousands of years." - Patriarchy theory.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:44 AM
12

"One in three women face domestic violence." How come every time I see one of these stats it's different? I think they're just making shit up at this point.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter