TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SWatt_Officer Archive

View 0 posts and 51 comments by SWatt_Officer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There’s a big difference between regular google searching and reverse image searching. And again, it’s based on general traffic - men don’t typically have inspirational quote images about how strong they are compared to women, so ofc there’s not many images to find.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 10:53 AM
2

Thats just a data bias. The majority of the data fed into these will be stock images and facebook posts from the US, which will have a bias towards "attractive", "young", and "white". Its not indicative of any deliberate snubbing, its a reflection of the wider bias towards those trends in social media.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 04:17 PM
7

and its wrong, i literally just opened gemini and tested it with the same prompts and it made a man no issue. Would share a pic but images are not allowed in comments.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 01:47 AM
41

Do lots of people make inspirational quotes about men being stronger? No, they dont. The reasons for that are irrelevant. Google will show you what exists, and it just so happens that theres a lot more random "live laugh love" poster crap about strong women. Thats not "woke".
/r/MensRights06/09/25 02:08 PM
71

Youre an idiot. Its just searching for similar images, and it has the word "strong" and "women" in it. Of course theres gonna be a million inspirational quotes and similar things in google images.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 01:58 PM
5

So this would also apply to men, yeah? So if you’re a guy, live alone, never in the army, and don’t fall under your definition of a ‘government’ job, we also can’t vote? Right?
/r/MensRights29/08/25 12:59 PM
13

Sorry, you’ve mixed up somewhere and just ended up racist.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 07:20 AM
4

Again, he was the ONLY ONE SHOT. You’re just not actually reading what I’m saying at this point, and I’m not going to waste any more of my time on you.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 11:40 PM
5

False equivilence and you know it. Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are far more public figures. You're comparing Trump and the president of Switzerland (or whatever they have). They may both be the same technical position, but one is obviously far more publicly known.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 10:31 PM
5

Not if its not a massive part of the news. When the united CEO was taken out it was an isolated incident that dominated the news. This is a mass shooting in Manhatten, the fact a CEO was one of the victims is not the main news, theyre just another body. The United CEO was also taken out in a very precise, targeted way. It was an assassination with motivation. This latest one is just (for now at least until motive is known) a random victim of a larger incident. If a CEO convention blew up, im sur…
/r/MensRights29/07/25 10:25 PM
104

Or, hear me out, the United CEO was a single targeted assassination where no one else got hurt, while the Manhattan shooting was a wild indiscriminate spray that killed multiple people and put the entire area into panic and fear. Dont pretend these are identical events.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 09:47 PM
7

Thats a great way for you to get a fine with jury duty, btw. Its classed as contempt of court, at least in the UK, maybe its different in the US. They wont care if you claim you never recieved it.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:07 PM
1

Are you high? Of course people are going to the companies. Of course just asking those encouraging the movement arent going to stop cause people ask nicely or not so nicely. The point of these sorts of things are to make it clear to the companies that are listening to them that it is unpopular and they should reconsider. Bellend.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:11 AM
2

Alright then, let me ask you for your sage advice - what would you suggest people do in this sort of situation? Lets ignore the specific details and just go with the basics - company in another country stirring up shit online that doesnt break any law, pressuring payment providers and by proxy many other companies to purge content you want to see. Nothing is illegal, you just think its an overreach and want them to stop. What exactly, besides telling them to stop via wide action, petitions, etc,…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 10:14 PM
2

The goal is for them to stop, therefore the goal is "stop them". Its not something that as far as im aware can be legally reinforced, but it IS something that with enough negative pushback they could be forced to stop. Hence, "stop them doing this".
/r/MensRights24/07/25 04:11 PM
2

The only thing people on the internet really can do - stir up a fuss, draw attention to the issue, make companies know that the general populace disagrees with their actions. What exactly do you expect people to do, physically confront them? Travel the world to protest outside their offices?
/r/MensRights24/07/25 07:52 AM
-43

You mean like him stating his new stance in this video? Fuck you want him to do, try and get a third term?
/r/MensRights22/07/25 05:08 PM
25

"it can be grown again" - in another fucking century. With your logic, stonegenge is just some rocks, they can be replaced, so who cares if i break one? Oh, that flower garden? its just plants, we can get more. Oh, this 2000 year old vase? its just ceramic, who cares if i break it, we can make a new one. Dumbass.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 12:21 AM
78

Come on, it wasnt "just a tree". This was like if someone broke part of Stonehenge.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 09:32 PM
-21

I would agree, except that some of Wilburs closest friends sided with the claimed victim. Sure, you could say that they just bandwagon’d, and maybe that did happen, but I would like to assume they know him better than you or me and also, you know, spoke to him. Also, I can’t remember the details but he did something really fucky with his moderation in the wake of the accusation.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 07:02 AM
25

WTF? "Connects a young boy to his father" - its not a bonding experience XD
/r/MensRights24/06/25 09:40 PM
1

This is why you should not rely on AI to write stuff for you, you can’t guarantee you’ll agree with it or that what it says is true. Write something heartfelt yourself, don’t just chuck points into an AI and share the result without even proofreading.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 12:10 AM
2

I consider some of their ideology to be in line with Nazi rhetoric. They may not be 1:1 Nazis, but in the case of Elon that’s only one of the many things that make me call him one, it’s part of the larger collection.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 12:26 PM
-1

When he conveniently only starts hanging out with said child after a CEO gets assassinated when he’s shown zero interest in any of his children before, then yeah, he is. Elon is a prick.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 12:20 PM
1

Honestly? I don’t think so. The term fascist was coined by Mussolini, but people with similar ideologies definitely existed. Similarly, the Nazi party had distinct ideologies and aims, which were almost certainly not original. While the term ‘Nazi’ has only existed for just under a century, im absolutely positive you could find plenty example of what we would consider Nazi ideology through various locations and times throughout history.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 04:13 AM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yhMpwSYKlc - a nice little summary, more of an overview of the general shit person he is. But to answer you, he as noted encourages and supports the white supremecist Great Replacement theory, has actively donated to extreme far right parties across Europe, some of which have run into legal trouble over themselves touting nazi talking points - on the point of nazi talking points, Elon supports Trump, who has directly parroted some of the nazi parties - and even H…
/r/MensRights02/04/25 01:41 AM
1

While I do intend to read further, i do find it funny that the initial glance at the wiki for it refers to it as "debunked white nationalist conspiracy theory" with a link to the article for "white genocide conspiracy theory", which also notes that it is a "myth based on false science, false history, and hatred". As noted, I do intend to read further, including the links you provided, just thought it was funny to get that slap of "no its not true" the moment i started googling.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 07:54 PM
-2

Yeah, I wish i was trolling. He actively advocated for the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory, supports the borderline nazi far right parties across Europe, and did two nazi salutes at the inaugeration (no it wasnt "his heart going out", "because hes autistic", "a bad angle", just watch the video), hes either a nazi or an idiot who thinks pretending to be one is funny, and either way, he can get fucked.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 07:30 PM
4

Personal politics aside, hes still a piece of shit when it comes to his children, so I can't exactly find much sympathy for him.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 07:28 PM
-8

Please let’s not act like Elon is a victim in this instance, he’s had like 15 children, has been disowned by at least one and only started appearing in public with one of them after Luigi happened, which is either a heck of a coincidence or he’s literally using his child as a meat shield. And that’s not even getting started on the Nazi shit.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:55 PM
38

I could have understood where you were coming from - until you suggested that Trumps 'ceasefire' had any weight to it. He wants to hand ukraine over to putin on a silver platter, he doesnt give a shit about the ukrainian people or anyone else. Ukraine is choosing to fight, so we support them. Its not a footballs game, its defending the very core of human decency against tyranny and dictators. The US seems to be forgetting that.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:23 PM
1

I do genuinely appreciate you giving more detail, i find too many people (including myself) dont actually explain things, just quick "no youre wrong", and it all too easily devolves to playground fights.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:35 PM
1

You are probably right, I’m getting correlation and causation mixed up.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 05:04 PM
1

See, this is what I wanted - you’ve given me a lot of good points as to why I am wrong, rather than just going ‘no’. And it’s a lot! I will have to have a good read and consider the genuine possibility that I am mistaken.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 05:00 PM
1

I’m not about to pretend that illegal immigration isn’t a big issue for many countries, cause of course it is. But both in the US and other countries like the UK, bad faith parties use it as a stepping stone in order to target wider groups. It’s of course not universal, I’m not saying everyone is racist.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 09:07 AM
3

From my perspective, it’s less ‘Americans are dumb’ and more general horror at how you let certain things happen. Like, I don’t think Americans are dumb for their gun laws, individually you aren’t responsible, but I am still horrified how you’ve cultivated a culture where a dozen kids gets gunned down a week and the response is ‘well what can you do, guess we need guards in schools’ rather than ‘take the fucking guns away’
/r/MensRights17/01/25 08:29 AM
-1

I dunno, I’ve seen plenty of things recently that conveniently blanket statement people into ‘illegals’. But I’m sure your returning president definitely only wants to deport the absolutely proven illegal immigrants and definitely isn’t just racist. So perhaps my concern on that front is unfounded.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 08:27 AM
-2

You, uh, gonna elaborate on that? The other guy at least presented specific issues he believes the US to be further left in. You just gonna leave it at ‘nuh-uh’?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:26 AM
0

Unfortunately you are correct, the far right has been swiftly rising across many countries in Europe in the last few years, in my opinion spurred on partially by Trumps success in the US.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:25 AM
-7

I’m sorry, genuinely, but what? The US is further left on immigration? Perhaps I’ve just been hearing the wrong news stories but last I heard you just elected someone who ran mass deportation of immigrants as one of his core tenets. Europe takes in millions of refugees and immigrants yearly. This might genuinely be a case that I’ve just not heard from the right sources, because this genuinely took me off guard. In what world is the US left leaning on immigration?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:24 AM
2

Because it’s good to have a wider perspective instead of only looking inward? It can help see biases within the local system, look at alternative options, or see issues that others have fallen for for you to avoid. Why wouldn’t you want to look at the wider world when examining your own nations politics?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:19 AM
6

From the perspective of most of Europe, both the US 'left' and right are both right-wing. Your left-wing got taken out back and shot during the Red Scare.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 11:45 PM
13

You are the epitome of the sort of person people assume dominate this subreddit, and the sort of person that gives the entire movement a bad name. You are the bad apple that spoils the bunch. Mens Rights doesnt mean Islamist society, patriarchy, or complaining about being 'dominated by the gays', ya weirdo.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 02:10 PM
2

To be fair, that entirely depends on which country we are referring to.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:38 PM
4

That quote is a great one, and my word is it suitable here.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 06:28 PM
7

Holy shit, theres bad takes, and then theres toxic waste. I cant even play devils advocate its that rotten. I even went to try, reading over to find the logic to bargain with, and had to stop myself. Im not about to pretend that western civilisation is perfect or anything, but come the fuck on, just glossing over the legal beatings, arranged weddings, child marriages, gang rape, so on and fucking so forth. How in the FUCK do you write a post like this and not think for just a moment that you may…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 06:27 PM
25

Yeah…not sure about this allegory, chief…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 01:55 PM
3

It was a while ago, but I think their general argument was that society was male dominated throughout history. I won’t put words into their mouths I don’t clearly remember, but that was the general jist.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:36 PM
23

I had a conversation with some people at my local college who were sharing pins and stickers with those sorts of slogans. I pointed out how young men and boys could feel actively targeted or deliberately slighted by such slogans, and they did agree with me. But you know what their argument was? They said that because of how unbalanced the scales are in favor of men, perhaps we NEED the scales to be unfairly pushed towards women for a bit for them to balance overall in the future.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 02:38 AM
1

I once asked someone promoting a bunch of badges and stickers with that sort of slogan if it wasn’t potentially just as harmful to ostracise men, especially younger men, in this way. Their response was that yes, it could be a problem, but they felt that in order to reach a balance of ‘true equality’, an over correction might be needed first. She also said that men didn’t know what it was like so ‘equality’ felt like oppression…
/r/MensRights31/08/23 01:56 PM
4

Shut it, Wesley!
/r/MensRights06/10/18 09:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter