TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Salamadierha Archive

View 1 posts and 1,007 comments by Salamadierha on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
139

FeminismSalamadierha/r/MensRights18/04/24 03:08 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,007 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
67

Bloody hell. RIP.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 06:59 PM
7

The national service is an issue, should be all or none. Corporal punishment imo is a form of punishment that we should return to here. It is cheap, effective, and doesn't put lots of people into jails we need for more dangerous/violent criminals. It should be applied to all for those reasons. A punishment does NOT have to be nice. It does have to avoid "cruel and unusual", which imo needs some actual definition. It appears to be more directed towards capital punishment, eg to prevent hanging dr…
/r/MensRights02/07/26 08:27 AM
5

Hohum. Which population segment has the highest growth rate? If you want to downsize population you cut the largest growing part of it. So let's see, who's for fewer brown and black babies?
/r/MensRights30/06/26 10:33 PM
10

All words are made up. Cis and trans come from chemistry describing the orientation of molecules. They've been incredibly poorly applied to a mental health problem, but they are legitimate terms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism
/r/MensRights30/06/26 01:19 AM
0

I don't know it's intending to marginalise normal mental health, rather trying to put it in a framework that automatically accepts trans. If cis exists, then so must trans. A much more accurate version is the one you've already mentioned: normal and abnormal. For me the real question is, is this part of a mens rights issue, and if so, who are we meant to advocate for? The men who say they aren't, or the women who say they're men?
/r/MensRights30/06/26 01:13 AM
6

It shows a very limited imagination if you're not willing to accept that others have different experiences to you.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:54 PM
8

See what happens when you assume something and don't even talk to people? I've had women come and tell me directly they wanted to take over, have special treatment because they were women, and that they were more deserving somehow. If you have no experience in life then try not to show it so badly.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:59 AM
11

So I guess you won't want to hear of years of judo, karate, badminton, fencing, roleplaying games, computer gaming, all areas where women have come in wanting special treatment right from the start. Not all of them, but enough. Now, as for your experience never seeing anything like this?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 04:45 AM
17

As a power trip I've seen it happen. If you think "women would never do this" then you need to clear out all the crap you were told as a kid.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 10:32 PM
34

Because they want to be heard by men when they start talking about how vile men are. Personally, if a woman came into my space spouting that shit, she'd be leaving shortly afterwards.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 08:10 AM
4

What, more so than they are already? You mean you want men to be shot on sight if they approach a rescue centre?
/r/MensRights28/06/26 07:59 AM
1

It's true though, within certain limits. Trying to argue that men aren't more capable of violence than women are is a losing proposition that'll just make you look foolish. The argument would be who initiates violence more often, men or women? That discussion should also include women being verbally aggressive. And how significant is the violence women offer to men? Any that includes the use of weaponry of any kind should be considered very significant.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 10:18 AM
81

If you don't film it: It never happened, you're lying, you were abusing her. If you do film it: you were more interested in getting the film than protecting the kid. The judge working as intended, Kafka-trapping the father.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 06:55 PM
1

Hopefully the judiciary got involved, charging them with making a false accusation? Somehow I suspect not.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 05:22 PM
48

It's very poor. First off, 60k for 40 hours a week eventually turns into 2.5m for 15 years 24/7. Then all the lost life events, family, kids, people dying that he couldn't say bye to. And then the living conditions, brutal, dangerous etc. This is them [saying the prison time itself was no big deal.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 12:02 AM
2

Not in question, the problem is that they are doing this much more effectively than we can get the truth out. We can't change the environment until we can get the message across.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 12:33 AM
4

We're being out-propagandized. Letting this kind of bullshit get published regularly is resetting boys positions back down to "those who should be oppressed" We need a definitive, clear source that can counter all the BS they are putting out, and we need to amplify it everywhere.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 05:50 PM
5

Maybe if you read my post you'd notice I addressed it. It's amazing how women seem to think that blocking someone is winning an argument. And how coming to the mensrights sub to scream "men bad" and not being banned is somehow due to them being great debaters, when the truth is they aren't worth the effort.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 04:57 PM
20

This will benefit men not at all. We won't get extra time off or more pay, it'll be framed as "excusively a woman's issue" yet they'll still refuse to define what a woman is or say that men and women are physically different. It WILL result in more men being hired, and more discrimination suits being brought, and consequently more claims about the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:49 PM
11

Male victims almost never get any support, or at least nothing worth talking about. The problem is that feminists have control over the purse strings, and as long as they can parrot the "always a man" narrative that's not going to change.** So we need to emphasise that the narrative is wrong. That's the only way we'll get support for male victims. ** That's where male perpetrators get held accountable, they're already given max sentences, except where the oppression ladder gets in the way and gi…
/r/MensRights31/05/26 10:07 PM
41

"Violence against women and girls" inherently rules out concern over violence against boys, which means those female abusers get a free pass.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 01:31 PM
0

IF.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 12:32 PM
-6

It's not. The problem is that it's paying for stuff that you don't get, eg a necklace for your AI girlfriend. It's a scam.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 07:02 PM
4

When you've spent a few hundred quid on her for new dresses etc, you'll realise where the problem is.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 06:59 PM
7

I don't see how this is terrifying, but it's definitely a scam. Paying real money to buy your AI girlfriend a digital box of chocolates?
/r/MensRights26/05/26 06:59 PM
0

The political difference between FGM and MGM is FGM had support from 3rd world countries only. I'm not claiming Jews are a bogeyman, nor am I hostile towards them in any other form apart from their support for MGM. And that support in western civilisation is significant, certainly stronger than FGM had. It should also be noted that FGM was recognised to be harmful to womem, thus getting the opposition of 90% or more of everyone here. Something harmful to men will receive nowhere near that level …
/r/MensRights26/05/26 03:46 PM
12

The best answer is to ridicule the attempted definition. Insist on the original definition, "sex without consent", never argue the point apart from refusing to accept it. This whole thing is an attempt to make women completely protected from accountability. If you must argue the point, make them prove every element of it. Starting with the patriarchy, moving onto institutional power. If they can prove either of those then we've been wrong all along :p
/r/MensRights26/05/26 01:31 PM
0

Dream on. Jewish lobbyists are rife in both your and our governments, and I'm sure muslim leaders would find a way to encourage violence around the matter. Btw, I was referring to banning MGM, not religions.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 11:14 PM
3

Who's talking about US men? And if that's not a major issue, what are?
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:22 PM
4

Maybe, but governments tend not to like riots.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 06:30 PM
40

Great article, well written. The problem with MGM is that it runs headlong into Jewish and Muslim practises. The only way we'll stop it is by banning those, and these are not groups any government is likely to risk going against.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 05:30 PM
33

Why wouldn't they be chasing the partner who left for child support? A: because she's a woman.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 04:32 PM
4

This type of thing will happen, you get good bosses and bad bosses. The key to a happy life is realising when you have a bad one, and moving on from there. To be clear, you CAN'T change her opinion, or make her magically become someone good to work for. You'll do much better if you find alternative employment.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 12:47 PM
3

Not as rough as those kids though. Poor sods.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 04:49 PM
8

And how much does anyone want to bet that she'll be "under extreme pressure" and "finding them impossible to cope with" when it comes to trial, guilty with a sentence of probation.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 11:09 AM
7

Tbh I don't know, and my instincts say it's not going to go well. There's a political force in power that really dislikes men, and there's no way of clearing it out, as it's infected most of the political spectrum. The sooner he gets out of full time education the better off he'll be, less time to really grind him down.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:43 PM
2

All the time. Male nurses get a lot of that.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 06:54 AM
23

Like hell she is. She's one of the 0.01% now, she's got no business attacking anyone.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 01:25 PM
7

Why would you assume it isn't?
/r/MensRights07/05/26 01:22 PM
1

Well yes, there is that. Though I dislike stereotyping all criminals as unintelligent, there are plenty who are. The more I think about it, the more I'm starting to believe that our societies problems with criminal behaviour really started with the removal of corporal punishment in the first place. Much as the huge problems we have with discipline in schools coincided with the removal of corporal punishment there. There seems to be a very obvious parallel there.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 01:21 PM
1

One of the various good things about corporal punishment is that it can be applied appropriately. If someone is a habitual graffiti-ist ?? then a couple of thwacks might convince them otherwise. It won't do significant harm, nothing over a week to recover from, but it will provide a very memorable reminder not to spray on stuff. A drunk driver might get ten to send the message home. Obsessing over "a torture method" is unhelpful. Anything can be turned into a torture method if you want to, imo i…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 03:03 AM
-8

Support for corporal punishment comes from a desire for retribution - wanting to see criminals suffer. Which is understood and warranted by the justice system. Putting someone in prison makes criminals suffer, fining someone ditto, that's what punishment IS. There's a whole bunch of other things involved as well, but having criminals suffer and being seen to be suffering is central to the system: Deterrence. When you lose track of that, you end up with a justice system like we have now, not fit …
/r/MensRights06/05/26 06:38 PM
-10

Corporal punishment is unpleasant, but punishment is meant to be. If we took everyone in jail for non-violent offences, caned them and kicked them out, we'd be in a much better position, and able to ensure people committing serious offences stayed inside for their terms instead of 1/3 the duration. Using it on kids should be a last resort for a critical situation, eg if a kid refuses to understand that cars can be dangerous and continues to run into roads. But it needs to be an option for that v…
/r/MensRights06/05/26 06:31 PM
102

To be specific: This is systematic sexism: absolutely it is. that feminists cry about: normally they cry about systemic sexism, but they seem to have a blind spot for this one. Can't imagine why.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 05:46 PM
8

Cherry2000 saw this coming
/r/MensRights02/05/26 02:47 PM
5

Hopefully mention is made of female rapists and mothers murdering their kids when they come out with that "1 is too many".
/r/MensRights01/05/26 03:06 AM
2

You'll need to do better than randomly throwing out an unjustified remark.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:05 AM
3

Fighting for mens rights is not "becoming the enemy".
/r/MensRights25/04/26 08:53 PM
1

Was wondering where Grok was in this review.. it can be convinced if you provide the data and keep pushing on it.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:22 PM
10

Why not? It's not as though giving in to their every demand has brought a halt to the war.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 10:04 PM
1

I've worked 30 hours a week part time in the UK. 7.5 hours x4 days.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 10:02 PM
1

More of that "well-founded judgement"? You're arguments would make Cicero blush.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:59 PM
2

Your course is therefore obvious. Bring popcorn and a phone to record it. Have fun :)
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:57 PM
1

"Well founded judgement" "THASSS CREEPY!!" You think that's a well founded judgement?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:52 PM
1

We all know that that's not how they really see younger women, they are trying to manipulate the argument using the "women are innocent, sweet and naive" perspective. Another common belief is that women mature faster than men, which would seem to contradict the above. Worth a mention.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:50 PM
2

18 is more than old enough to decide for herself what she wants to do. This argument is almost always brought up by older women, the usual assumption is that they aren't getting the attention from men their own age. I assume your step-sister is roughly your age? So if you want to shut her up, or watch her explode in flames, just mention that older men prefer younger women because they are more attractive, more fertile. Leave it at that, nothing else, hit her at the core of what women consider im…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:44 PM
8

From the perspective of most of these women they'll be fine with it, they weren't interested in these guys anyway. They probably believe they can always drop their standards and pick them up whenever they want. If women focus more on abusers, as they obviously are doing, this will be just grist for the mill for feminists claiming all men are abusers etc. Exactly the same as women going down dark alleys at 2am and wondering why they are getting assaulted. And any advice saying "stop doing that!" …
/r/MensRights23/04/26 05:39 PM
29

Yet more proof that we really live in a matriarchy.. or is it a gynecocracy?
/r/MensRights21/04/26 05:29 PM
16

There'd better be a legal challenge to this.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 05:26 PM
49

She's a police officer but claims she was coerced for years? And unable to understand her actions were breaking the law? Some defence lawyer there just created BS out of whole cloth.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:57 PM
0

It's a start. And I can guarantee that there'll be a bit of mission creep to the benefit of boys and men eventually.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 04:16 PM
13

No. We had a small attempt at a "Party for Men and Boys" a while back, nothing nowadays.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 07:25 PM
10

Most students at university would have the self awareness to realise they are still very young and not at all conversant in the ways of the world. I think a lot of posters on here have been in your position, myself included, and there's nothing quite like finding out the true beliefs of someone you thought was a decent human being. Again, a lot of us myself included used to consider ourselves feminist, until the revelation that feminists as a whole really do hate men. There's a few who don't, bu…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 12:47 PM
6

It'll never happen if we won't hold them accountable.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 03:01 PM
2

Not my point though, I'm saying that the title of the topic is putting the blame on men for being lied to.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 02:59 PM
2

My point is that one of the things complained about in here is the way men are blamed for everything while women are never held accountable. And yet we do it ourselves in the titles of our own posts. If we want to see a change we need to change that about ourselves, or we'll just be hypocrites.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 02:57 PM
11

But the primary group at fault are the feminists for lying. That's not "convenient", that IS the truth. Trying to shield women from responsibility for their actions is what got us here.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 11:45 PM
18

I'm not talking about any video, I'm talking about the title of this post.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 07:57 PM
124

Strange how that comes round to blaming men again. Why not blame the feminists for lying?
/r/MensRights11/04/26 07:19 PM
6

The question we'll have to ask ourselves is which side of the fight we'll be fighting on.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 04:18 PM
5

It means you can't decide not to do it. Sure there were penalties attached, but you had a choice not to register. Now you don't.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 04:16 PM
2

I believe the usual term is motte and bailey fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:06 PM
14

2 issues: 1/ content mod needs to be the same for both. Having sexist platform [Reddit] rules in place "misogyny is evil, misandry is not bad" gives a wink and a nod to the misandrists to carry on the way they are going. Removing gender bias from those rules [if you want to call gendered insults hate speech you call all gendered insults hate speech and treat them equally] is essential. 2/ women admit they are misandrist, but come up with a lot of excuses for this behaviour, minimising it and att…
/r/MensRights07/04/26 03:33 PM
6

She's made a statement saying that her "'For Blake Lively, the greatest measure of justice is that the people and the playbook behind these coordinated digital attacks have been exposed and are already being held accountable by other women they’ve targeted." In other words the usual pack of metoo "I also want 15 mins of fame and maybe a payout". She honestly thinks she's so attractive that there'd be a coordinated effort to get a couple of kisses off her costing them a few million? "Targetted", …
/r/MensRights03/04/26 03:18 PM
1

She's killed her acting career with this. Not for complaining about anything, but because of the extreme list of control she insisted on having. I can't imagine any director wanting to work with such a diva.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 03:12 PM
1

That reads a lot like our public order Act: sounds good but once you get into the detail none of it would have to be more than an interruption she didn't like. We didn't think the public order act was going to be used to arrest people for hurt feefees, but that's the way it's turned out.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 04:00 PM
14

She had those most important of virtues, self awareness and honesty. Like Cassie Jaye. Both started off trying to debunk "men have problems", and both came to realise it was true. Most importantly, they said so, which is so rare, feminists who realise the truth are definitely scared of the reaction from their colleagues.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 12:50 AM
2

Feminism is a cult following the delusion that women are disadvantaged or oppressed.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 12:57 PM
17

Never confuse the propaganda for the reality.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 03:47 PM
22

Simple rule they live by, if you can't win the argument in front of you, change it to the argument you can win. Drag them back to the point, multiple times if you have to. If it's online expect them to go silent and/or block you.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 03:19 PM
2

Yeah. The only time I could imagine genital surgery to keep a kid alive would be cancer of the penis. But that's incredibly rare to start off, and almost only found in older men.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 06:44 PM
1

Nothing at all, that's the point. There's nothing that makes either system better than the other. Unless I suppose you can guarantee the 1 man in a meritocracy is the best possible for the job, but no one has worked out how to do that yet.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 06:41 PM
-3

Tbh I think they are. Democracy: 1000 men decide, wiser than 1 man. Meritocracy: 1 man decides, wiser than 1000. Courtesy of R Heinlein, RIP.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 04:08 PM
2

Personally I'd prefer a plan that has a social safety net for everyone contributing to society. It doesn't need to be forever, but does need to protect against the vagaries of life.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 04:04 PM
5

Parental consent only applies for the medical benefit of the child. Accepting that consent to amputate parts of his body with no medical need is vile.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:55 PM
5

Strictly speaking we generally don't need more rights, we need the ones we have to be enforced. Getting rid of draft laws would be good. Equalising gender protection would be nice, anyone saying anything bad about a woman gets lambasted, about a man and it's "you go girl". Having a viable choice whether to participate in pregnancy. I don't want to try to force a woman against her will to either abort a kid or have it. I DO want to be able to decide if I participate in it or not. It'd be great to…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:53 PM
12

Because the whole point of having rights is to be able to express personal preference. Governments can choose what's best for their country, that's their job.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 12:42 PM
108

It doesn't really matter, neither the left nor the right are interested in men having rights. They just differ over the reasons why.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 12:41 PM
11

I understand why they wanted to get rid of "previous sexual activity" cross-examination in rape cases, but this pendulum has swung way too far. Failing to enquire as to whether she's had previous false/unproven rape accusations directly led to these men's lives being trashed. This isn't justice or investigation at all. The police owe them an apology at the very least.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 12:34 PM
5

Whatever the situation, the #1 argument will always be "It's your fault". Which is what this boils down to. Alternatively it can be read as "it's not my fault" if that makes it clearer.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 12:39 PM
1

What I REALLY don't understand is why it's not automatic for women who commit SA to be required to register as a sex offender? I'm sure there's a political element in it, but the whole point is to inform people nearby about the situation, and to be mindful in these cases of their kids. If anything it's needed more in these cases, people are automatically cautious of men, but women don't suffer that, making it easier for them to abuse.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 11:43 AM
3

This is general knowledge by now. About all reddit is good for nowadays is thousands of cat subs.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 11:30 PM
18

Look at any of the posters or the adverts, [with 1 exception], all of them aimed at male abusers and traffickers. I've seen literally ONE ad that pointed to a woman being a kidnapper, which was hilarious because all the way through it played on men being the bad guys, then she was arrested and the little girl returned to her desperate mother. Talk about mixed messages.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 08:55 PM
38

It's an area where women can exclude men and they make the most of it. I've seen midwives talk about getting the father involved and then cut them dead when a husband asked a straightforward question. At some point we need to start talking about how absent fathers are a problem, but that very absence is instigated by women immediately after a birth.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 08:52 PM
30

Because those stats mean 6% of fatalities and 15% of serious injuries are to women!! Obviously that's unacceptable!! Tbh all the numbers are too high, workplace deaths should rapidly becoming a thing of the past for everyone, men should be getting loud about it though.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 04:04 PM
14

Occasionally you can. From yesterday
/r/MensRights05/03/26 12:54 AM
9

I've never seen a ship called "cis patriarchy" before..
/r/MensRights03/03/26 02:51 AM
3

I had hopes for the grievance studies group, but that seems to have died out.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 07:42 PM
2

Reasons not to go to university, you're not paying for an education, you're paying for an indoctrination.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 06:35 PM
24

If Australia were to be credited, they shouldn't release his name at all if he's found not guilty.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 12:35 AM
14

WTAF! A realistic sentence?? Holy crap, maybe there IS light at the end of the tunnel?
/r/MensRights20/02/26 08:00 PM
3

Protecting what you've worked to achieve is not selfish. Would she want you to not protect the marital assets once you get married? A pre-nup will never be used if a marriage doesn't break down.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 08:00 PM
5

For people who've obviously contributed to the problem, they seem to think they deserve a say.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 01:25 AM
9

It's not about talking, that doesn't help at all. It's about improving conditions for men, which wouldn't be incredibly different, it just takes someone to actually do it.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 11:55 PM
1

A fake man is the sort of man who would criticise other men for having concern about their lives, while sat in an office well away from the fighting. Like this guy
/r/MensRights17/02/26 10:02 PM
10

It also is possible that some of the physical attacks women claim they are responsible for are actually acts of self-defense, Gover added. “Maybe some of these women have been abused by their partner for some time and they’re finally fighting back,” she said. And you can say the same for the men, so it's an entirely pointless comment to make.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:56 PM
52

It's not something that should be normalised wrt sex/age. Fires don't care how old you are, or what sex you are.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:51 PM
2

Holy crap, an appropriate sentence?
/r/MensRights13/02/26 06:36 PM
44

Because women are better at complaining, and also attract more votes as a block. This makes them very attractive to politicians who decide where the money goes.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 05:00 PM
1

No, and yes. Men are incredibly bad at supporting each other, it's much easier for men to support women. Find a better way to frame an issue than "it's bad/good for men".
/r/MensRights09/02/26 06:29 PM
5

Oh they can and certainly will expect it, they're going to be sadly disappointed though.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 01:28 PM
10

Judges don't make the law, they just rule on evidence based on that law. As usual, it's the politicians who carry the blame.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 09:37 PM
6

At least, if you're going to risk helping in situations like that, do what he did, record everything.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 08:32 PM
5

So no example then? Guess you're a little distant from reality after all.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 08:22 PM
31

Feel free. You have the knowledge, post the article of a female teacher being arrested and charged for dating an ex-student, with NO contact prior to graduation. I assume everything else will be equal, no other laws broken etc. We await your post with baited breath, but with a realistic sense that you're going to ghost.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 11:45 AM
2

It's certainly rough round the edges, but at least it's got rid of the ever-present censorship that used to plague it. It's the only social media that comes close to free speech nowadays, certainly a lot more than reddit.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:40 AM
7

Just once, I'd love to have a captive feminist audience who are forced to answer the question: "how are women oppressed nowadays compared to men?". The usual result is "wage gap!" and once you point out how much BS that is, they go radio silent.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:37 AM
1

if it's mother-daughter competition then that's a different issue with different consequences, I get what you're saying but it's not what we're talking about here.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 02:50 PM
13

Not in that way. It emphasises that she will always be thought of as perfect, never the cause of any problems etc. It's a real failing in her upbringing, failing to hold her accountable for her actions and mistakes. And this one is definitely on the dads. Sorry to say, but we make the rod for our own backs here. If we don't teach our kids to be respectful of others, and mindful that they nor anyone else are perfect, it's not going to go well.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 02:02 PM
216

"Daddy's little princess" is responsible for so many ills in our society nowadays.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 02:26 AM
1

If it's taken four months to find out her political persuasions, and you said you had to poke it out of her, then it might be worth continuing with her. As you say, a good therapist is hard to find. If she's been good for you then I don't see too much of an issue, she obviously has her personal opinions well under control.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 10:09 AM
6

Sue for custody, then get her to pay child support.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 03:48 PM
3

Quite right, so why not wander off somewhere else? If you want to discuss the issue, go ahead. If you just want to sit back and whinge about the people commenting, then take a hike.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 11:44 PM
10

It's always funny how fast someone trying to ignore a real problem with jump to official stats that almost completely ignore the problem.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 11:41 PM
14

This is common across the board, "you can't be racist to white people" "you can't be sexist to men" etc etc, and is the hallmark of incredible hypocrisy. Either the offense is real, and applies to everyone, or it's imaginary and doesn't harm anyone. I'd imagine there'll be the equivalent in trans communities.. [cis-phobia?] which would also be denied.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 06:31 AM
0

Which would make great publicity while a suit was ongoing. Just keep it going on, and on and on..
/r/MensRights19/01/26 06:53 PM
6

Yeah it sucks, but on the flip side it looks like there's an opening in the market there for a gay dating app that you can keep clear of women.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 04:48 AM
39

Idgaf why she did it, lock her away and leave her there.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 04:26 PM
5

I wonder where OPs post about the Tea app went? Ahh, seems like she never thought that was a problem, only when men got a similar one. Curiously biased.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 12:46 AM
1

Gone now, but she was not "early 20s".
/r/MensRights08/01/26 05:42 PM
8

Age difference? I'd put them both at late-20s early 30s.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 01:54 AM
13

Anyone claiming that hacking someone to death with an axe was "deserved" in any circumstance except self-preservation is an out and out psycho.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 01:51 AM
1

Ran into a bunch of psychos on X the other day who were using it as a badge of honour, "Orthodox Misandrist" etc. No, they weren't joking, and were completely incapable of seeing the problem.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 01:09 AM
0

Not a chance. The whole women support each other and men support women is bone-deep sociology, it's as close to genetic as it can get. I'm coming to the conclusion that there's no way we'll ever get equal rights, there's not enough interest or understanding of the problem, and there's not enough time left to do it. We may end up with "men are warriors and in charge" again, but equality? No.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:09 PM
9

Do not do it, you'll be held liable for any children that come of this, child support etc.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 09:41 PM
0

Chronic pain comes from physical damage. Both sexes are prone to it, women because they are more fragile and break easier, men because they tend to be doing more physical jobs or put themselves in the way of harm more often. As always with these things, failures on the original statistics recorded are to be expected in older studies.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 05:29 PM
4

70% of those who COMPLAIN about chronic pain are women. I remember going on a ride, and talking to a guy about his unusual riding style. He said he couldn't bend over very much, and when I pushed he said because he's got cancer across here, lower abdomen and here. hips. He just wanted to get out on rides in the time he had left.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 05:23 PM
5

Give it 10 years and Millennials will. Give it 25 and Gen Z will. It's a change brought on by age, seeing how the whole thing works, and more importantly by actually owning something of value which Gen Z doesn't yet. When they do, it'll be Gen Z vs Gen A. The original point was correct: "Young men don't vote like old men do."
/r/MensRights28/12/25 01:57 PM
1

I still prefer real books to kindle etc, but bookshops are a dying breed. Online bookshops though, ideal.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 02:21 AM
3

The ok episodes were heavily outnumbered by the incredibly crap ones. Once it was clear the way they were going after the Jodie Whittaker episodes, I gave up. After 50 years watching it. I won't forgive the BBC for that.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 12:08 AM
2

Glad he got custody, and glad he's pushing for a change in the law.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 05:23 PM
5

David Weber, Honor of the Queen. [Hard-ish Sci fi]
/r/MensRights27/12/25 03:27 PM
32

That would be the BBC influence, the same people that turned the Doctor female and his assistant trans. Find another station to listen to.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 03:25 PM
1

Bookshops? So 19th century.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 03:24 PM
23

This is what happens when you get a confirmed feminist in a position of power.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:01 PM
5

They'd do a lot better just spending the money on educating boys properly.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 06:54 PM
38

There are. It's called perjury, and there are some pretty harsh sentences for. But who are we kidding, this is women making the accusations, no one, not even the law, are willing to hold them accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 02:42 PM
1

Same concept as the "Are we dating the same guy?" It's up to you whether that's good or bad.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:09 AM
4

Always the same crap with Phillips. Performative for cameras and news headlines, but with no substance behind it, and absolutely nothing for the boys she's also supposed to be safeguarding. Hey, Jessie, how's that enquiry coming along?
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:08 AM
14

I wonder if those teachers will be screened for misandry? I somehow doubt they will be.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 07:58 AM
2

It's so blatantly obvious that equal treatment should be applied to both boys and girls. And yet it isn't. Yet another situation where girls get much better protection than boys, yet they still try to claim that society treats men better. How?
/r/MensRights15/12/25 08:16 PM
-2

The question is, what are they applying for?
/r/MensRights15/12/25 03:12 PM
0

Which was why I suggested "closest to a fair balance". And push any obvious biases to the owner for fixing. While I'd imagine some of that would get laughed at, you might get some traction with grok.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 03:19 PM
0

So find the AI that's closest to a fair balance, and use that exclusively.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 12:59 PM
7

The point is that if it existed, it was described as men ruling for the benefit of men. Which is obviously not the case, almost all of the benefits of society go towards making life easier for women. I've not seen any benefits aimed solely for men. Also, now we're seeing women in all levels of authority, which rips apart that other element that men are in power.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 09:04 PM
14

The problem I have with feminists is that they are liars and hypocrites. They talk about equality between the sexes, but when pushed on the subject their interest isn't equality but raising the game for women. Which would be fine, you have your priorities and I have mine, but they try to insist that I have to prioritise women in the name of the equality that they don't support themselves. Also, patriarchy theory is a load of crap, it has no pillars of belief that can be supported, so it twists i…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 11:50 AM
5

Hands up everyone who is surprised by this. No one? ok.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:41 PM
1

He was the experienced climber. I know she was responsible for her own gear etc, but he should have called it all off if she was unwilling to cater to the requirements. Would she have gone up there if he wasn't with her? Yeah, it's unfair blaming him for her actions, but in this case he was the one who knew she wasn't fit for it, and still went. I don't know if that is manslaughter, but it's certainly something.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 07:39 PM
4

This won't go anywhere, as there's no proof of a change of intent, or declaration of intent in the first place.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 12:50 AM
2

Did you forget already? Careful-Radish1747 this is untrue and damaging. This proves that it's entirely true, and that the government will stick to this view no matter how many people want it changing. Feminists like to say we live in a patriarchy, where everything is arranged for the benefit of men. The obvious conclusion here is that we're in a matriarchy, or a gynocracy. Women don't usually rule directly, but somehow everything is done to make life easier for them and harder for men.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 08:33 PM
9

Well yes, that's quite obvious. I already linked the source but in case you missed it [happily ignored it because it doesn't fit with your wildly inaccurate preconceptions] https://i.postimg.cc/VvwbHX3w/r1.png Feel free to go to the link on the screenshot, you'll see it's legit.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 05:07 PM
38

Ahh, the "I'm rubber and you're glue" defence of an argument.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 04:36 PM
22

I think I've heard of 1 case in the last 2 decades where a woman was charged with that, and that was her being part of a rape gang encouraging it. Meanwhile, plenty of rapes go unpunished and unnoticed because of that bit of political evilness. https://i.postimg.cc/VvwbHX3w/r1.png
/r/MensRights28/11/25 04:34 PM
32

There was no hate towards women there, just statement of facts. And somehow "womens hate to men" is less damaging? You obviously don't even look at society through a feminist lens, you use feminist filtered glasses. They blot out everything you don't want to see.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 04:31 PM
6

As the saying goes "they can fuck right off". As always, men have to accept the results of women's infidelity. All those religious leaders, and not one mentioned wedding vows? Get stuffed.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 01:03 AM
3

If the responses to this do not include "you need therapy asap", then that sub has nothing to offer sane human beings.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 03:55 PM
3

Because it wouldn't be good for their political careers.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 11:30 PM
16

Prosecutors alleged she had sex with a 14-year-old boy She was convicted of it, it's not "alleged" anymore.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:08 PM
24

1/ Wikipedia is full of activists. Use it for strictly factual information, but do not rely on it for anything that has a political angle. 2/ Our whole political, law, education and judicial systems are rife with systemic discrimination against men and boys. It's much harder to find anything that is actually fair than to find something that is biased against men. It's a matter of taking a little time to see the bias, rather than assuming everything is just fine.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 05:48 PM
12

No point in having it then. Might as well leave the day to that much more celebrated item: World Toilet Day. If you think that was an accident both days are on the same day, I have a bridge to sell you.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:36 PM
3

A slight change, BBC style: Into believing that it is men’s fault that women are suffering.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:35 PM
3

Make a noise then. It's up to you.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:33 PM
1

There's meant to be something much stronger, marriage vows. A gentleman's agreement has no chance if the vows won't stand.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 07:18 PM
1

Fix the laws and the men will follow. It was the laws that drove them away after all.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 04:08 AM
2

And there's part of the problem. "one that honors God" is completely irrelevant to a large section of the population. You want to force people into marriage because it fits your religious beliefs. Other men have realised that currently marriage a really shit deal for men and are demurring. If you want to fix the problem with marriage, you need to get into law/politics and make it fair for men as well, because right now it's definitely not. Trying to argue from your religious perspective means no…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 02:51 AM
1

To a degree, once she realises what she's done she's going to be in hell on earth.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 02:36 AM
2

Maybe, maybe not. It's hard to tell immediately, a long relationship is required before it might be worthwhile. Previously it was you expect a woman to do as she's said, you should trust what they're saying until and if they prove you wrong. Nowadays, it's a better idea to assume that they aren't being honest, until they prove that they are. You can call it being an idiot all you want, but we're talking about people's lives here, and it's a long long time to regret it if you get it wrong.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 08:47 PM
24

It doesn't matter in the slightest if HE remains committed to the relationship if SHE isn't. And nowadays marriage has become a viable way for women to get the bag they want for their entire lives, with absolutely no effort required. Marriage when it was invented was a great idea to provide a structure for people who wanted to build a life together. Since then it has been eroded and warped, and recently turned into a money grab for women. The courts need to re-define what they expect out of marr…
/r/MensRights17/11/25 08:28 PM
-8

The mother is schizophrenic, it's most likely that she was suffering an episode when this happened. I'm not a bleeding heart type, but this is very sad for her as well. It does throw all the blame onto the professionals who were supposedly monitoring this case, and it should. They were obviously neglectful, and it led to the death of a young boy who had complained of being scared for his life before this happened.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 08:23 PM
20

Red flags after red flags here. “She was strangling me,” later describing how “Mom grabbed me by the neck, squeezing it with both hands.” and the response?: – that were dismissed by prosecutors as [b]potentially accidental[/b]. so ignored because it "might" have been an accident? Concerning a woman being treated for schizophrenia? I'm not saying schizophrenics are always violent, but if someone around one reports violence then you take it seriously. A court-ordered psychiatric evaluation will de…
/r/MensRights17/11/25 08:18 PM
13

This IS the priority, as long as authorities can claim that this was "an isolated incident", or an "unfortunate, completely unexpected tragedy" Then this will keep on happening. Complaints of violence from the kids MUST be taken seriously, even if it screws with the social workers ideology.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 08:08 PM
52

What? Accountability for her actions? How novel?
/r/MensRights16/11/25 04:05 PM
7

If they'd made statements to that effect then the guy involved really needs to get on the prosecutors ass about making false statements. It's not enough to "get it cleared up", it needs to be pushed that some women have no regard for the truth.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 02:32 AM
21

This is the sticking plaster on an arterial wound. Paternity tests are NOT being offered when the couple are married, where fraud and betrayal are much less expected, and much harder to deal with.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 06:54 PM
3

that's one of the sources of the between 2 and 10 percent figure It isn't.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 06:11 PM
2

It really isn't, that number dates back to the 80s before DNA testing was widespread.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 05:13 PM
11

What imo the real problem is, is that the marriage vows means nothing to these women. It's just words they say so they can wear the special white dress and be the centre of attention for a whole day. A woman like that is NOT worth getting married to, they won't be the other half, the partner they are meant to be, but just another set of eyes watching for you to fail. They are meant to be less pressure, not more.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:42 PM
3

There's no difference between her and any other woman, and no difference between a relationship with her or any other woman. So she's an actress, so what? Doesn't put her on a pedestal.
/r/MensRights05/11/25 04:04 PM
6

Who cares? The point is the same, she's not going to be having any more kids, and her attitude is sheer entitlement and arrogance. I'm not looking at her as a fan, but as most men would someone they might be considering dating. She'd be great for a fun time, but not for a long-term relationship.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 08:40 PM
8

She's got kids, and talking about dating again? Take what I said above, and double it. Note I said nothing about cats, that's entirely your own contribution.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 08:37 PM
33

She forgot to mention how they must not be interested in kids, seeing as she's 39 now. Men don't care about women's success etc, she can do what she wants there, but what does she actually bring? A worn out body, entitlement and sheer arrogance. Yeah, that'll bring men in droves.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 11:02 AM
9

It takes nothing away from female victims, but it does take away the concept that "women are entirely blameless and always the victim no matter what" . That would have a knock on effect for feminist politics, so can't be tolerated.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:12 PM
7

That's as credible as claiming that rape doesn't happen as much as they claim it does because only 5-10% of charges are proven.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 03:05 PM
2

What about the men who feel unsafe travelling with men?
/r/MensRights28/10/25 08:19 PM
9

This is blackmail. Going easy on her for it will only encourage it more in future.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 01:18 PM
24

So win-win for women? This will probably happen then.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 01:09 PM
7

To all the boys in Australia, if someone tries this on, tell them to go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 07:58 PM
23

Sounds like a court case for trespass, invasion of privacy etc.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 12:54 AM
9

I'm sick and tired of this ridiculous conflation of "women makes a false accusation" "Can't punish it in case other women won't come forward". They are not the same thing, they are not talking about the same thing. The guy falsely accused has a right to see justice done in his case. Failing to prosecute a false accusation debases the justice system creating a 2-tier situation, increasing the likelihood of further false accusations: if you won't prosecute a crime you are essentially de-criminalis…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 10:25 PM
7

Women can be charged with rape, even in countries where it's gendered. But they are mostly looking at using an object to penetrate someone else without consent. I did see one where a woman was charged with rape because she was part of a gang rape, if it had been all women it probably wouldn't have been the charge.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 11:26 AM
12

Whether or not most do or don't is irrelevant. Fact is that the population of lesbians engage in more DV than other groups, so should be considered a high priority for supervision where children are involved. Once the DV rate has equalled out with the other groups then the priority can ofc be cancelled.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 08:43 AM
17

While I accept they are generally given an unfair label, they are the most active in domestic violence cases, so social workers should be prioritising them for visits. I would put money on them not visiting at all though. If that's the case, or these SWs records show reduced supervision then they should definitely face professional board enquiries and criminal charges.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 07:31 AM
3

Ahh, got you, thanks but governments don't think like that. In the UK, it was 60/65 as above, with complaints of inequality. So the government raised women's retirement age to 65. Tbh if they did equalise retirements between the two, you run into the issue that more men than women work, so you lose tax revenue anyway.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 10:52 PM
1

Not following you there..?
/r/MensRights19/10/25 10:29 PM
0

It always has an effect. Even if just a manager grabbing them and saying "we know there's nothing to it but blah blah" it has an effect.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 10:29 PM
-1

Point is not to come away from the appointment, whinge on reddit and leave it at that.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 09:27 PM
22

It costs less for pensions, and provides more taxes from wages. Then the men die within a year or two of retirement, so win win.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 07:20 PM
1

If you're having issues with any aspect of healthcare due to poor attitudes of staff, make a complaint against them, to the surgery/hospital and to their overseeing body if appropriate [doctors/nurses]. There are ways to get something done, but reddit comments aren't it.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 06:52 PM
3

Depends if the AI was asked to produce something from scratch or if it was given a photo and told to make something of it. There's no mention of any target though so you're probably right.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 07:11 AM
72

Now charge her and jail her. And sue the hell out of her later. This is pre-meditated, against someone who has no connection with her. It's entirely self-motivated, to get her attention. The AI image doesn't matter apart from it's a new-ish way to make a false accusation, the crime and the intent remains the same. Until the law treats these seriously it's going to keep on happening.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 07:48 PM
13

That's a feature, not a bug. Nothing of value has been lost.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 06:11 PM
128

I now see that I longed to be loved but I was too scared to be vulnerable. I was using my sharp mind to protect my all-too-soft heart against yet further rejection. She's still lying to herself: claims of a "soft heart" are completely opposed to her self-description elsewhere.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 09:20 PM
1

That seems to be the gameplan, yes.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 01:55 PM
8

It's going to be pretty hard to deny once the feminists close all the women's prisons.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 01:07 AM
8

Let me rephrase "women they never knew hundreds of years ago they think were oppressed"
/r/MensRights11/10/25 01:05 AM
2

Slightly mis-read by me, but your comment makes even less sense if read correctly. on the non hetero spectrum. Why would she be interested in him at all if that were the case?
/r/MensRights10/10/25 06:58 PM
3

Not at all, if she's calling herself a woman and acknowledging the social power she has.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 06:24 PM
9

Oh but she's not single, she's "self-partnered". That's the single persons BS to try to claim to be in a relationship. That should tell you all you need to know about her mental abilities.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 06:50 PM
3

So controlled opposition. "You can say what you want so long as you don't say anything that might upset me"
/r/MensRights02/10/25 02:52 PM
2

This is it. Even pro-male subs like askmen get policed by feminists, though they do have a female mod who's delightfully non-feminist.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 02:50 PM
9

It's strange to see all the comments of "I hate this government, BUT". Judge the rule made/changed on its own merits. Which is funnily enough the point of the change being made here.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 06:28 PM
10

The question should be: "how is it women are brought up to believe that this is at all a reasonable position, that they can't see how they are leeches to the family?"
/r/MensRights30/09/25 03:04 PM
7

What a surprise.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 02:57 PM
2

"If your client sticks his tongue in her mouth I'll sue your ass!"
/r/MensRights30/09/25 02:36 PM
46

Because why would they blame themselves when they can blame someone else? That's really all there is to it.
/r/MensRights20/09/25 01:49 PM
24

In a similar vein, any woman not interested in having kids or having passed the time to be able to do so are "excess". See you in 20 years..
/r/MensRights18/09/25 01:56 PM
17

I'd have no problems with this, IF it applied to boys as well. It doesn't, demonstrating a very solid bias against boys on behalf of the government and justice system. This highlights the absolute need for a Men and Boys Minister to stand for our rights.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 11:22 AM
3

I'd bet none of them would have dreamed of turning down Tom Cruise.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 03:55 PM
7

You failed to discuss the role of the clitoris, after rather dismissively claiming foreskins "can be removed without effecting the overall function of the organ." The clitoris fulfils no significant role in reproduction. Feel free to list the "defecits", along with the studies that have shown how imperative they are. The "our organs are more important than your organs" is such a bullshit argument, tbh people with this attitude should be banned from the sub.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 06:35 PM
3

They're bought and paid for, the foreskins are sold to cosmetic companies for lots of dosh, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see that the docs are getting some of that as well, they might have targets to meet.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 06:31 PM
4

Hmm, that's an obvious connection: MGM is strongly linked to PTSD. PTSD: emotional numbness, severe anxiety, isolation/withdrawl Women "men won't open up to us" Also women "circumcised men look much nicer" Not trying to pin the blame on women here, just pointing out a cause/effect trail that may not have occurred to people. If you leverage that anxiety to violence [as can often occur] then it gets you in another way.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 06:29 PM
4

So say there's a 60-40 split in favour of men receiving organs. I doubt there is, and I'd love to see the data, but whatever, take the assumption. So there's a 4 out of 10 chance of her donating to another woman, and she's removed that chance. All she's done is lowered the likelihood of someone living. She's not evil, just deluded. She's made it less likely that someone lower on the donor list, by her logic most likely a woman, will receive an organ. Some people are fucking stupid. One side effe…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 06:02 AM
2

Sounds like a scenario for a reverse Babooshka there.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 06:53 PM
1

In order to discuss women's issues you have to consider how women relate to each other at an individual level. Until a theory comes along debunking "the sisterhood" and how all women get along, are a unified force, we should not take it seriously.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 04:14 PM
2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 05:40 PM
1

Pennsylvania is not in the UK.. You might want to be telling the men in the US to move out.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 01:32 AM
3

Well, isn't this interesting. Feminism complains about normal and reasonable male habits being toxic masculinity. Maybe it's time to show just how toxic we can be. Seems to me expense is an issue here, so if you want to be a single dad you're going to have to do some work, get money in the bank, get a nice house etc. In fact, all the trappings that a certain type of woman likes. You know, the ones that sing that dwarf song all about gold.. So it'd be wise to caution prospective dads to beware th…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 10:44 PM
13

Simply because it is now considered evil to argue against someone's "lived experiences" when that person is a woman. Pointing out that they are talking crap is considered bullying, suggesting that they are deliberately making it up is akin to rape. Add that in to the way the media supports them, and there's no chance at all of getting an honest message across.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:43 PM
2

Because hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 03:32 PM
12

So that's 2 of them who should be behind bars.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 03:30 PM
6

They aren't interested in the truth, they're only interested in winning the argument, to show that their side is stronger. Don't reveal personal information, it'll always be used against you, you'd be amazed how they can twist things.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 02:49 AM
5

Had this yesterday on twitter. When it came down to it, the only privilege we have is being able to use cheap shampoo and soap. She had no answers for the legal and educational drawbacks men face.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:36 PM
1

Point it out. Talk about it in public, a lot. Know your arguments and have your sources ready.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:33 PM
1

The number would go down, the 30% are with relationships that are rocky enough for the man to consider it a possibility. If you do mandatory testing then you bring in the many many relationships that are actually stable, meaning a lot of them would indicate the father is the father. This is not an argument against testing, just talking about what would happen if mandatory testing came in.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:22 PM
1

This is how you end up with women being locked up while the men aren't at home.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:18 PM
2

For a long long time now.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 12:12 AM
2

Yup. I'd never heard of him before you mentioned him above. Par for the course.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 01:23 AM
2

I wasn't aware there were any international newspapers. Some that like to believe they are, but in reality, nope.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 09:23 PM
2

Nope, I'm in the UK. Still difficult, but not impossible.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 09:22 PM
5

He'd have lived longer. They knew he had a congenital heart problem and went ahead with a circumcision anyway? Poor sod.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 09:21 PM
6

Which makes it being required even more insane. But we're not going to change things there, hopefully we can change things here.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 09:15 PM
12

It'll happen anyway. But at least the boys in civilised countries will be safer. [Yeah, I know what that's saying about SA, and I stand by it]
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:35 PM
6

The world CAN see this, it's literally a national newspaper. The real question is, why doesn't the world care?
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:34 PM
11

Just save it for when some idiot tries to say it's harmless.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:32 PM
6

Oh I can go along with that saying. Of course, the problem is knowing that she was raped in the first place. "No false accuser gets justice" is also true nowadays.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 10:25 PM
4

There should be personal responsibility on the part of prosecutors and judges. This should be limited, but there should be an element of it. The crown prosecutor who led the case here just grabbed the nearest guy and set him up to go to jail. That merits at least some financial punishment. Medical and nursing staff have to have insurance for malpractise etc, I'd hope that legal staff have the same requirement.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 11:22 AM
5

If she's pointed the finger at him leading to his conviction then she contributed to his imprisonment for no reason and is partially responsible for it. Idgaf about it being hard to solve cases, that's not my job and it'll also be harder to put men in jail for no reason in future.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 11:18 AM
4

Sure, fair comment, but at least OP could have tried to pick someone where justice had been unduly harsh. These two deserve what they're getting, it makes it hard to try to argue their case.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 10:42 PM
8

Nope, this was a tree that was ancient and a cultural icon. They deserve their time inside.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 10:38 PM
2

And finding children sexually attractive is definitely perverse. It's not "love", it's pedophilia. Which is why you got all the downvotes and comments.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 08:19 PM
3

Nature doesn't say so at all. Nature starts waving the flag at puberty, and secondary sexual charactertistics are the indicators that it's time to start thinking about it. Before that is definitely abusive, harmful and morally indefensible.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 08:07 PM
30

Men's Lib is controlled opposition. Where you're allowed to say you're a man, but you have to support the narrative at all costs, any awkward questions will lead to your expulsion. It's their place to wave in front of cameras when someone asks "how do you get along with men?".
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:17 PM
2

Maybe you should accept that society as a whole is opposed to under-age sex, and consider how you phrase what you say. Sounds like you've said the same things previously and also been rebuffed for it. This post is objecting to boys and girls being treated differently, that one will be prosecuted while the other is emotionally supported, not trying to lower the age of consent. Sex is absolutely not for all age groups.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:14 PM
2

"how people identify" is responsible for most of the issues we face. If we were women then most of our issues would disappear, no chance of being drafted, no negative discrimination in courts, legal or family, school would be a breeze.. paternity issues would still be on the table but that's a hell of a quick fix. That's not really the point though, I've been stabbed in the back by people I was trying to help way too often. If we're going to support them, then they have to have some kind of feel…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 09:04 PM
2

If it's our fight, are we supporting trans men because they are now men, or transwomen because they are genetically male? I agree about the feminism issue, but then again feminists and hypocrisy are old friends, so no change there. And innocents are ALWAYS caught in the crossfire. but at least in this case it's going to be someone who at least has an idea of what the arguments are.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 05:31 PM
1

They've been discrediting themselves for years now but they keep on churning their garbage out. The problem with taking the high road is that sometimes the other position becomes mainstream as there' no one arguing against it. That's happened here, continuing to ignore it will only continue to strengthen their position.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 02:08 PM
12

Not our fight. There's way too much still unresolved in the whole trans debate, and frankly the argument that you can think you're the other sex and people should take it seriously doesn't make any sense to me. And btw, just because that's the case does not make it "bigotry" or whatever buzz words you want to use to try to silence viewpoints that don't agree with yours. But if you want to call people offensive terms, I'm sure you won't be upset when they return the compliment.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 11:43 AM
2

They occupy a space in the political landscape. Have you seen UN Women? A great source of regular doses of misandry. If we leave that alone it will continue to pump out the most appalling anti-male propoganda possible, like Emma Watson. Having a friendly voice inside that organisation would be very helpful.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 11:35 AM
3

Crab bucket. Maybe this could be the start of a new initiative for men. Maybe the outrage of the poor treatment from an organisation that's meant to give a fuck will stir other men to action. Maybe nothing will happen. But definitely sitting down and saying nothing will happen will cause nothing to happen.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 11:03 AM
4

Wtf is the statutory rape charge?
/r/MensRights12/07/25 11:11 AM
1

I'd say a 1 in 10,000 chance of a son dying is more than anyone would want to risk for something unecessary. Start with that, and add on the rest.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 07:17 PM
1

They achieved their goals in the 70s. 50 years later they have to look for ways to stay in employment, so "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights10/07/25 02:18 PM
1

Yet those are the easiest for parents to potentially ignore.. "I wasn't bothere by any loss of sensation, so he won't be". and "it worked fine for us, that's how we had him". It's a lot harder to ignore the deaths associated with circumcision, and the many complications of a botch job.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 10:21 AM
1

If that's your intent you need to expand on a lot of areas you didn't discuss, particularly the actual consequences/potential side effects of circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 08:33 PM
3

Culture/religious doctrine in both male and female circumcision. The only difference is the religion that promotes them.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 08:30 PM
1

Your decisions, your support or otherwise affects the decisions others make. We need to be removing the situations where decisions can be weaponised to harm someone else.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 08:24 PM
2

There's an equally ridiculous counter-argument going around nowadays that men create life with their sperm and women only host it. Neither are correct. It's joint venture between sperm and egg.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 08:20 PM
2

We've been making this argument for 5+ years now that I know if, and it has received absolutely zero traction. We know what "should" happen. What we don't know is how to get to there from here.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 08:17 PM
10

Don't be an idiot. She's shown you who she is. If she can't even last 10 minutes at a gig without getting it on with someone else she doesn't give a toss about you. "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice..." You're setting yourself up for the second time or more. GTFO.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:15 AM
2

Could be I suppose. It'd be tricky to try to research it though.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:13 AM
8

If there's a nurse requirement for observation you're more than within your rights to ask for a male member of staff.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 09:34 PM
2

Sounds more like a figment of her imagination to me.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:19 PM
13

Maybe you should look at some of the recent sentences for women having been found guilty of GBH or murder. If there's any factor that can be used to mitigate or change a sentence it's applied full force. It's quite easy to see how a mentally impaired woman could kill someone and receive virtually nothing, suspended sentence, or community service in return. That's why you're being downvoted, because you're thick as fuck or trolling.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:04 PM
17

Or we could push for it to become universal, no men are allowed to be involved in personal cares of anyone. Women, get back in the house, your babies need you. Can't they see the obvious outcome of their rules?
/r/MensRights05/07/25 11:39 AM
22

The first thing I thought of when you were saying that is that men are likely to be sleeping deeper, on account of having been at work all day. The question of being "attuned" or not doesn't really arise.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 11:37 AM
1

Well, we're men. Men tend not to do the "let's talk about it", aiming more for the "this is how you fix it", so sharing solutions is by far the majority of support offered. What I didn't discuss earlier was that sitting around in a circle complaining about things is a [moderately biased] description of group therapy. If it's not in a circle then it resembles AA support groups, where the important part is getting it all out and seeing that others have similar problems to yours. It could be that t…
/r/MensRights05/07/25 11:32 AM
1

Yeah, it's a regular occurence in any sub that doesn't toe the line.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 02:35 PM
1

Thanks, I think it'd be useful with those arguing in good faith. There'll still be people coming here taking screenshots and running back to feminism HQ with their "gotchas", but at least it'd help with the aggravation problem.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 02:01 PM
10

Chill out a little, the OP was worded fine and indicated that men were doing equal housework but women weren't doing equal yardwork. Valid comment.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:57 PM
0

I don't recall ever complaining about women being angry. It would be very much appreciated if they'd keep it in their own subs and not spreading it out all over the place though. You know, like men do here.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:54 PM
3

Not quite, "Men deserve a place where they can be angry". This is it. And tbh, if you can't see the need for that, then you should reconsider who's being myopic here.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:47 PM
2

I understand how that can be irritating, but that is one of the core functions of the sub, a place to allow men to vent. It should never be stopped because some people can't hit backspace. The best I can suggest is that the mods create a flair "venting" or "Rant", and that gets applied to posts of that nature, so you know to avoid them.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:44 PM
0

Megathreads are garbage, it's a way to ignore something while "providing somewhere for them to talk". And you can legislate divorce, which is a huge cause of mens problems.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:32 PM
2

No, no and no. I've had over 10 years of "being the bigger man". You know what it gets you? Nothing. You'll see "unhinged rants" in here because those men have nowhere else they can go to let out their absolute frustration of society treating them like shit. Those men need to be in here more than you do. If you feel a need not to be associated with that, there's the door.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 12:20 PM
9

Why do you think 90% of men come to this sub? Because they have a righteous indignation of the unfairness of society towards men? Maybe a couple. Most are because they have experienced that unfairness personally. Which is why we get a fair share of rants and men who are bloody pissed off, because they've just lost everything when they thought they'd done everything right. And it's not as though there's anywhere else on reddit where a man can let it out and not get banned. If you read the above a…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:54 PM
8

Yeah, that's why I differentiated between actually being safe, and feeling safe. "Feeling unsafe" has been weaponised for quite a while, there was that talentshow hostess who insulted one of the contestants, and got called out for using autotune. Next think out of her mouth "I don't feel safe with you here." [50 feet away] There was absolutely no need for it, she just wanted to shut him up.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:36 PM
62

That's entirely up to them. Their feelings are their own concern. If they feel unsafe around men behaving reasonably then they should go get therapy for it.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:45 PM
11

Women should be taking their own steps within the law to ensure their own safety, and their own emotional state. There is a significant difference between the two, just because they feel unsafe does not mean they aren't safe. If they wander into a situation where they aren't safe, they have to be able to deal with it. I'm sure they'd hate to be placed on a curfew to ensure their own safety.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:43 PM
1

It doesn't matter if they could fire them or not, they were functional, and could have been used in trade for so many things. Imagine what Iran or North Korea would offer for them? The US and Russia still thought they were important enough to remove from circulation, and gave public promises of protection. Which they reneged on. If they are willing to lie about something as vital and important as this, they'll be willing to lie about things much less obvious.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 10:58 AM
3

Point is, there's a lot more men like that guy, than the 3 chucking him into the car. And there's the same in Russia, lots of men being conscripted. This shouldn't be about which government is more of a cunt, it should be about human rights.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:43 PM
4

That guy being dragged into the car, what did he do?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:25 PM
-1

It's a political position now, you can't say one side isn't as bad as the other or those on the other side will auto-downvote you no matter what the arguments will be. In order to improve rights for men, first we have to convince them to actually think for themselves.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:25 PM
7

Whatever else might be going on, I don't know the pros and cons of it. But I do know that when Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons both the US and Russia vowed to protect them against agression. And both the US and Russia lied through their teeth. This WILL have long term repercussions on trying to convince other countries to give up nukes, or to stop trying to develop them. No one will believe either country about something so important.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:22 PM
-3

I've just thought of a great way for Russia to get spies into the Ukrainian armed forces.... This is the ultimate expression of draft legislation. As long as your country can force you into battle you do not have basic freedoms.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:17 PM
3

That was what I was saying, these girls at that age were thinking of murdering someone. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 11:17 PM
1

That's not a relationship though, "on rotation" is experimenting. When you stopped seeing them, did you think of killing any of them?
/r/MensRights28/06/25 11:08 AM
4

A very interesting quote from Florence, unfortunately as a reference she is very flawed, what with her own mental health issues.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 11:35 AM
15

This is just insane. Wtf are kids [yes, both boys and girls] in relationships at 10 years old, let alone to the point of thinking about killing someone??
/r/MensRights26/06/25 10:15 AM
4

Take that money, leave the country. Tell her to fo.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 05:09 AM
3

If the women's team got relegated then they should expect to be getting paid less. They got a freebie £750k and they still can't keep the lights on?
/r/MensRights14/06/25 12:53 AM
10

I saw some men trying to talk about it, and they were getting all the shit in the world from the pride lot. Whoever set this up did a great job of making sure it wasn't going to be useful at all.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 06:14 AM
3

Make sure the jury is aware of it. "Oh I'm sorry your honour, it slipped out in the moment! I do apologise"
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:46 PM
19

No, it doesn't. It deliberately misinterprets oligarchy as patriarchy because that way feminism might be relevant. None of this is accidental, or a mistake, it's entirely deliberate to play towards a political and financial agenda. The misleading of millions of women worldwide, and the demonisation of millions of men worldwide is not done by accident. There's too much money riding on this for them to make a mistake.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 04:09 PM
1

You mean men are listening to her anyway?
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:54 PM
2

It's all about getting those likes and clicks. She's obviously broken inside, will hate on men until the one she wants gives her some attention then it'll be "oh true love forevermore" for a month then we're back to this. Think of her as Britney 2.0, and likely to follow that same path.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:53 PM
1

Sure, I'm not going to try to debate that, what I said above is a generalisation, subject to individual circumstance. In your case however, if your job is that stressful and you know it's harming you, you should look out for yourself. Is the extra money going to benefit you when you're in the ground? And are you going to be able to provide for your family when you're no longer capable of work?
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:14 PM
1

There's a strong argument that we should publicly distance ourselves from both left and right, the non-committed interest groups tend to be courted more when it comes to elections. The important part is to be loud, and at least suggest that you're lobbying for a large group of unaligned voters.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 02:45 PM
3

It's a matter of how much time does each spend doing what. If both of you are working 40 hours a week then it's fair that both of you split the housework. If he's doing 60 and she's doing 20 a week then she needs to be picking up the housework. If there's a kid involved then it depends on what the kids needs are, it's pretty much common sense.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 02:41 PM
1

Until they block your account and delete everything you wrote. Which imo is a good reason to go and write it elsewhere and leave the echo chambers to die from neglect. They own their own servers etc. I'm not trying to paint them as gods, just the petty-minded tyrants of the *.reddit domain.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 02:54 AM
9

Women serve in the Armed forces. If they are vulnerable, why is that allowed? Assuming that they are the equals of their male colleagues, which is what we're all told to assume, then why would women class as vulnerable? It's not like all men are the same as military personnel.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 12:31 AM
12

Women tend to mock other women making an effort because it threatens their own hypergamy.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 02:49 AM
16

Because that's the way you were brought up, by your mother and father in a stable and loving environment in a society that accepts you and tries to help you succeed.. oh wait..
/r/MensRights29/05/25 04:17 PM
3

Any reaction or backlash that pushes the pendulum so far over the behaviour nowadays is as bad or worse than it used to be is a bad reaction.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 04:16 PM
30

It's encouraging that these isolated people are starting to speak out, that's how an extreme opinion eventually becomes mainstream. Hope things go well for her.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 04:10 PM
3

Why would you assume they don't know what they are doing? How do you know the current situation isn't exactly what they are after?
/r/MensRights28/05/25 04:11 PM
5

Reddit as the saying goes, is a private company and can force or allow whatever language they want. As such it "encourages" the political opinions of its owner. It's NOT a public forum, it's a social media aggregator, no matter how much it tries to look like a public forum. This sucks ofc, but until your government opens up its own social media company that's the way it's going to be. Personally, I prefer to do much of my social media interaction elsewhere.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 04:10 PM
66

People who differentiate on the grounds of sex are sexist. People who differentiate on the grounds of race are racist. That admin fulfils both examples in 1 go. Nice of them to be so efficient.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 05:58 PM
5

So they can claim to have had a debate but no one bothered to show up. That's ammo for feminists for generations.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 07:13 PM
13

I love how she skips the whole "going to trial and being found guilty" part of it. Men go to jail for sexual assaults they are proven to have commited. Strangely, the same can't be said for women.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:45 PM
13

Even in the most respected of callings, there will be variation in how those people act, and are perceived. When there are no barriers to calling yourself an MRA that spread will be larger.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:26 PM
5

They're really pushing that "illicit substances" angle, it's been used previously as an excuse for murder, so what's a little burning someone alive going to matter?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:06 PM
1

Thanks, but it's California, I'm sure they'll find a way.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:47 PM
38

https://archive.is/ZL7lr It should be a requirement to post an archived page if there's a paywall involved.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 08:23 PM
3

Nothing's changed, just cameras are much more widespread nowadays. Previously if someone reported it, it could be laughed off as there was no proof. Come to a cop with a full frontal of a teacher, they can't ignore that quite so easily.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:11 PM
1

Yeah, as long as they claim only a few percent of false allegations are proven to be false, the same logic says only a few percent of rape accusations are proven to be true. I'd much rather deal with the truth, but as long as feminists continue to lie it's hard to do that.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 11:43 AM
21

It's no use coming to men to talk about how some feminists are off the reservation, we already know. Go talk to the feminist leaders about it, and once they've done something about it then we can talk about fixing the rest of it.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:07 AM
19

This is where the brainwashing is, it's already rooted in that kid. She'll go on to believe all the crap feminism says about men, and in 10 years time she'll be protesting the funding of shelters for battered men.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 01:51 AM
19

Just so long as the parole board is made aware of this, 30 years needs to be 30 years here.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 01:51 PM
9

She murdered him. She caused the acid attack.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 01:17 PM
6

Either way, it's significantly higher than the 2-8% claimed by feminists. This is great info, thanks very much for your work.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 01:12 PM
9

And if it does and you’re proven innocent Strangely, that's the only time I've seen feminists jump all over "not guilty does not mean innocent".
/r/MensRights10/05/25 01:41 AM
2

Have you got a link for that second study? Well either, but especially that one, it'll be very useful in future conversations, but there's no way it could get accepted with some form of back up.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 01:39 AM
4

This woman needs to go to court and be charged with assault. It's already a given, maybe that'd stop this BS about taking her back.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 12:58 AM
1

If it were a true corporation then sure, they'd be following the crowd. Imo this more comes from the one guy at the top, and his personal beliefs.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 12:46 PM
2

Because that is the view of those at the top of the food chain, the admins/owners. This is not a democratic platform, all views are regulated from above, in the form of moderation policies, sites rules etc. You break those rules and splat, banned. No appeal for ideological disagreements.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 01:30 AM
2

Sacking her would be a response from the school to show that they are trying to maintain a high level of professionalism. Can you imagine a man charged with these crimes would still be employed for a minute after they came out? Can't help but notice you didn't answer the question though. Why shouldn't she be able to resign if they refuse to sack her?
/r/MensRights01/05/25 11:19 PM
3

Not American so I'm not following this properly.. Who cares whether she resigns or not? She should have been sacked already, and the police called in. Maybe she wants to resign so she doesn't have being fired on her record, but that's trivial compared to the charges?
/r/MensRights01/05/25 03:16 PM
2

Why? Just because something is a men's issue doesn't mean it has to automatically involve women.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 02:08 PM
1

It's about a specific sub-set of men, so it's undoubtedly a men's rights issue. It's also a damn awkward situation to try to thread the political needle on, but we have to take on the issues, whether we feel they are positive for us or not.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 01:18 PM
4

It's inappropriate contact, but so long as he's over the age of consent then no there's no authority issue here. She is in regular contact with the students though, so there is the possibility of grooming here.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 12:35 PM
17

If she pled guilty to 5, there must have been serious proof of all 12+, or they had her on something even worse.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 09:37 AM
12

So when a paper says "people" were victimised they mean men and boys, if there's a significant number of women/girls harmed they'll say "including X women". They also desparately try to conceal any other information that might be pertinent, eg in this case that it was Muslim terrorists that carried out the attack. I'd love to go through a typical paper, and count the lies they put forward.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 09:25 AM
3

What makes you think it isn't already the case? Just that there's no requirements for those at the top to house and feed the women, just text them and that's it. No effort required indeed.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 11:27 AM
3

Ofc, I was just pointing out the flaw in the logic.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 06:55 AM
30

Be a man, and "real men" are the same thing, someone trying to gaslight you into doing something you don't want to do. Be a real man: Tell them to fuck off.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 09:38 PM
2

https://archive.ph/hQGY8
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:55 AM
11

Yeah, we should always protect the child, so why are we asking the child to make child support payments?
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:53 AM
13

So many things wrong here: The victim also sustained several other injuries not consistent with solely being punched during the incident, but failed to provide any evidence to the police or prosecution. He didn't help the cops, she went after him with a weapon of some sort. The court heard that in the early hours of November 9, 2023, the defendant came across "very upsetting" videos on the victim's Snapchat. Which apparently gave her motive to attack him, yet no comment was made about what these…
/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:17 PM
10

Yeah, we're seeing that attitude already, it'll just get worse as time gives it more credibility. Putting it into schools is a disgraceful con, it also serves to distract people from the Labour parties failures while in office.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 07:11 PM
115

Imo the worst part of it all is the effect of the propaganda that's holding up the "men are evil" campaign that's been carried out over the last few years. We were just starting to get somewhere with it, after the "men or bears" argument ran its course, and now this is the latest way to keep it front and centre. And because so many people are treating it as a documentary that'll come back to bite us in the future when it's quoted as evidence against men. This is an entirely politically motivated…
/r/MensRights14/04/25 04:35 AM
3

I'd have thought identifying the abusive person and denying them entrance was the least a "refuge" could do. We're trying to get men access to DV shelters for their own use, but have we questioned whether they would be any actual benefit?
/r/MensRights12/04/25 11:24 AM
3

That would explain the high level of lesbian abuse then. But it doesn't answer the question, what arrangements would best suit them?
/r/MensRights12/04/25 11:14 AM
3

Yeah, they're driving more and more people away from left-wing policies by their appalling abuse of anyone who doesn't line up perfectly with them, especially men.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 03:44 AM
6

Do they not come forward because there's no point? Because there's no help available or accessible? Make support available and you'll see people coming forward to access it.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 02:05 AM
-1

Sharing shelters is not a good idea at all. There definitely should be support for male victims, but mixing them would be bad for everyone. However, that doesn't deal with homosexual SA/DV, what arrangements support those victims?
/r/MensRights12/04/25 02:01 AM
12

No no, it's "Up to 10 years inside". That'd be what a man gets if he was sentenced for these crimes, she's likely to get probation.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 05:42 PM
33

Thing is, there's 3 kids proving her wrong. Unless she intends to knock them off before the sentencing?
/r/MensRights10/04/25 05:40 PM
34

We dissect rape charge statistics enough on here for you to understand why those numbers are as they are. Trying to say "believe all women" like you do above is toxic af. Why do these long forgotten accusations always seem to crop up when someone is in the news for making an inconvenient point against the government etc?
/r/MensRights10/04/25 12:17 AM
-3

So?
/r/MensRights08/04/25 09:56 PM
6

More like tarnished by people who hate the red pill lot, trying to find the best way to damn all mens rights advocates in one go. Funny how that attitude doesn't follow over to the women doing exactly the same thing.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 05:33 AM
18

You need to learn how to defend your presence here. Strictly, don't defend it. Go on the offensive. "Ahh, you're just an incel posting on the mensrights sub". oh, so you think: "that boys should get a shit education?" "that it's fair that men die younger but have to work longer?" "that boys raped by women should have to pay child support if she gets pregnant?" Or any other impossible to attack position that we support here. Make them defend their position. You'll often get a few people coming al…
/r/MensRights08/04/25 05:28 AM
1

Not a clue what you're talking about, this thread is nearly a year old.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 05:20 AM
1

It's pointless trying to argue collectives, there's always going to be an example that will condemn all of us.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 12:26 PM
1

Because I was listing the different ways in this one area where women are privileged. If a couple conceive a child, but the woman decides she doesn't want it, there's nothing at all the man can do to prevent her abortion. If the woman decides she does want it, there's nothing at all the man can do to terminate it. And even then, he'll be coerced into paying for a kid HE DOESN'T WANT for 18 years. I've no idea what you think you're reading into it, but it's as simple as that. Women are definitely…
/r/MensRights04/04/25 01:23 AM
1

Please stop making shit up. I haven't claimed men can force women to have a procedure. You're still trying to ignore the fact that women have all the rights men have plus more of their own. It's as simple as that. Women are privileged.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 06:44 PM
2

You mean, if I were a woman, I'd have the same rights as women do? Yeah.. that's an amazing concept. No, as I made it clear above, I'm mad that some women try to argue that they have no rights, while having all the rights men have and more of their own. That is the definition of privilege, you can try to change or skew the subject all you want, but the facts remain, women have more rights than men in the west. They have the privilege.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 06:16 AM
3

Women for some reason do their level best not to accept that they are privileged in western civilisations. They have all the rights men have, plus their own, plus the goodwill and good feeling of society. Show me what rights men have in the whole reproductive process. Do we have the right to attempt conception? Only if she wants. It can be considered rape if she doesn't. Do we have the right to abort a foetus? Hah, hollow laugh. Do we have the right to surrender a baby to government care? Nope, …
/r/MensRights02/04/25 09:12 PM
3

Women accept that it's the only option they have because it's by far the easiest option they have. Men don't "will it into existence", attractiveness is an inate trait, it exists already. Sure, you can argue about "it's all about the beholder" all you want, but every living creature above amoebas are attracted to something more than others. I really wonder who came up with the idea of "aspirin between the knees", a man or a woman, considering the real losers in a free love society are older wome…
/r/MensRights02/04/25 09:04 PM
7

And I repeat, it's not about Musk at all, it's about the privilege women have while they try to claim being oppressed. You might not give a damn about anyone else, do you want them to not give a toss about you when you get screwed in a divorce/child support situation? I know I know, you're so tough, so butch etc, yada yada. So how about the rest of the guys who get shat on like this?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 08:42 PM
13

You misunderstand: men are the victims in this case, women are the aggressors. This is not about your personal politics.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 06:10 PM
3

Not in the slightest, but then the media isn't interested in peaceful lives, they can't sell papers or clicks like that. There's a whole list of ways boys are treated as less valuable/important than girls, quite a few belonging to schools and the way they are treat by teachers, and these have made their way into the mainstream. I hope if they try to have Q&A sessions about "misogyny" that these are brought up to the teachers faces to make it very clear who the problems are.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 05:37 AM
15

Obviously, yeah.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 12:35 AM
15

I wonder if she's ever described a female non-right winger as human garbage. People suck in so many ways.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 12:33 AM
10

Yeah, posters like the above "clear parrallels" seem to somehow never notice them. Reasonable I suppose, seeing as just about everyone else seems to ignore them also.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 12:17 AM
20

Ahh. People you don't agree with, "human garbage". Really showing who the people we really should be concerned about in society there.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 12:13 AM
52

How many boys. How many "clear parrallels". Then you realise what absolute crap you're talking.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 08:11 PM
1

if they argue anything like certain speech is violence. That's why I said if. But suicide cannot be blamed on someone else. So how did that work with that guy who was bullied into suicide by his gf? Seem to recall it went to court.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 04:25 PM
1

Marketing strikes again. They noticed the had a drop in sales on Mothers Day so did this to try to bring it back up again. And anyone with any sense uses the delivery service Morrisons offer, £40 a year, and free delivery Tuesday to Thursday in 1 hour time slots.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 12:07 AM
2

Male suicide rate. "Misandry is violence", if they argue anything like certain speech is violence.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 07:20 PM
23

We should have pushed back very hard against the concept of microaggressions. That was obviously the first part of speech control that wasn't related to direct insults.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 03:46 PM
8

Find a better argument. I'm sick of being smacked in the face and being told not to retaliate because it's "stooping to their level". If you can't put forward a better argument then sure, lock it up.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 02:33 AM
17

It might not be to your personal taste, but the articles they write are generally based on true events. That seems to be the standard nowadays, certainly the BBC and Guardian have issues maintaining anything better than that.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:56 PM
11

No, I still think boys probably commit more crime than girls, but that's not really the point. If for example, girls committed half the crime boys did [I suspect it's more, but stats], and were treated equally for it, there'd be a hell of a lot more young female offenders than 11. It's pretty much the same answer as "why did boys abilities in STEM seem to rocket upwards during the pandemic?" Because it became a lot harder to treat girls unfairly well.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 11:01 PM
15

Oh good, so we don't need to worry about all the theft and violence then.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 10:54 PM
28

Maybe, just maybe, if they treated girls the same way they treated boys, they'd find there were a lot more than 11 girls needing to be locked up?
/r/MensRights21/03/25 10:39 PM
16

So they're going to ignore the needs of the vast majority to pander to the few they bother to lock up?
/r/MensRights21/03/25 10:37 PM
4

He's not there to convince them, he's there to let them show you how insane their positions are.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 03:20 PM
16

The actual risk of men getting penile cancer or uti's are minimal. The reduction in the chance of penile cancer is due to the reduced amount of tissue there, so if you're really bothered about it you could just cut the entire penis off, no chance of penile cancer! Ridiculous. UTIs in men are virtually non-existent before they suffer problems with the mechanics, urinary retention etc. Proving there's any reduction, let alone significant reduction, would be unlikely, someone has been fiddling the …
/r/MensRights19/03/25 03:19 PM
19

Possibly because of the extreme gaslighting where apparently a man can "paid a £100 court application and had the entire matter resolved in one court hearing." Anyone who's ever been involved in family courts knows that this is not how it really works out.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 02:28 PM
243

He's never met the kid, but the mother is concerned that she'll feel rejected? It's just a money grab. She should be required to pay it back, could do it by wage garnishing, they seem keen on that method.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 02:24 PM
4

Afaik I'm part of modern society, so I get a say :p It's not a huge issue, but to me it does seem divisive, [These people can be affected by racism, those people only by reverse racism] hence the comment.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 02:00 PM
26

Reverse racism doesn't exist either. It's racism, either against white people or black people, it's still racism.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 01:29 PM
52

Go on, someone say "Nice" you cunts. Threatening to kill his mother? Yeah, he really wanted it, you can tell. ED: four counts of unlawful sexual misconduct with a minor, one count of inducing panic with a firearm specification and two counts of intimidation to a victim or witness Is under 5 years total a fair sentence for this laundry list? I'd have thought intimidating witnesses would be multi-year charges on their own.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 05:23 PM
7

And the Mail has killed commenting on it within 4 days of the article coming out.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 01:35 AM
7

Tbh what difference will it make, the justice system is already rife with bias and corruption anyway.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:33 AM
5

How many times did you get married to a Chinese girl and how many kids did you have? Not being arsey here, it might be one of those things that don't come up unless certain events happen.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 02:11 PM
1

And it seems like a routine thing in China.. While it is common for individuals to test their partners before marriage, some take it to extreme levels Using an electrical stimulation device designed specifically to simulate the pain of childbirth
/r/MensRights01/03/25 02:06 PM
6

And that's not good. She fried his intestines until they died.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 02:04 PM
1

Should interview him, ask him if he regrets his position on false accusations in the past. Thing is, this is what causes someone to swith their views. Like a mother whose son gets falsely accused, then she's all about rule of law, anonymity and due process. It's just a damn shame these people didn't look at how things play out before their personal involvement.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 06:11 PM
1

Both are crimes, but only one of them routinely gets prosecuted.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 06:06 PM
1

Both fuck your lives over. Sure, I'll get some pushback on this, but women underestimate badly how much a false accusation screws your life up. Instant no friends, no career, no family. There's nothing that can happen to women that's even close. I've heard men say they'd rather be raped. It's more painful but it's over quickly and everyone knows you're the victim there.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 06:02 PM
1

Well, I'd kick off about it, but it's never happened to me or anyone I know. The benefits of being English.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:31 AM
17

Men know about responsibilities. When they get married they collect a new set which they then proceed to keep up with. So no, marriage doesn't civlise men, it just gives men another way to show that they are responsible. Then women who aren't responsible go and get a divorce because "he's not the same carefree guy I used to date".
/r/MensRights23/02/25 02:08 AM
13

At least the DA was trying. And yeah, he'll end up paying child support, unless he goes for custody and she can pay child support.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 03:37 AM
1

Of course universities are more interested in making money, they've proven that just about any idiot can get into university for a really expensive and ultimately useless degree. I wasn't aware there was any need for debate about that. Generally I find if I assume that any big US organisation of any kind is a money-grubbing parasite, I'm not going to go too far wrong. I don't see the point in banks making the effort to supply student loans if they are so much less competitive than government loa…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 02:19 AM
1

Move to a non-extradition country. Nuclear option but there's no real alternatives to paying her a fortune for gaming the system.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 02:10 AM
1

I've not been ignoring any facts, you'll find that was someone else you were talking to. I understand you have a contract to have your loans forgiven. Now, about my questions, I was assuming you'd know the answers. I think universities would be very upset to have to limit their graft. That'd also have a knock on effect to NFL teams who take funding for stadia. Are there any banks offering student loans? If so, how do they compare to government loans?
/r/MensRights21/02/25 01:57 AM
0

How does the rates offered by the normal companies [government presumably] compare to bank loans? And isn't it up to the universities how much they charge?
/r/MensRights21/02/25 01:23 AM
3

Sounds like she's putting her plan into action, now that she has the lever she needs to use against you. This looks like it could go the distance, with her using that child to beat you into her will every time. IANAL but I'd love to see you get full custody here, after her violence etc. I doubt family court will take the blackmail into much account, though maybe the refusal to coparent would indicate she's not a good option for shared parenting. Good luck.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 09:42 PM
29

The exact opposite of reality, but it's how feminists want it to be so she'll get a lot of praise/sales for this. And of course her saying this is now quotable so feminists will use it in arguments about female oppression.
/r/MensRights17/02/25 10:18 PM
7

Women don't "need" to do this at all, men are more than willing to put it out there, in all forms. It's useless to try to wave a magic wand to get men to do otherwise, it'll never happen. What does need to happen is equal treatment under the law. That is something we might be able to achieve some day.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 12:49 AM
5

I'd say because at heart they know and agree with the reality that women are physically significantly weaker than men, so they are proud of the win. Sure, it's against a guy who's not actually trying hard, so it's not something I'd be overly concerned about.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 06:59 PM
0

Because of comparative comments. When you have commentary from all over the world about how nice your prisons are compared to theirs, it's easy to take them at their word. Admitted, nothing is quite as comfortable as a Swedish prison, but we can't have everything. Btw, have YOU been in a prison? Or do you just reflexively take the contrarian position?
/r/MensRights15/02/25 06:38 PM
2

That's a consequence of poorly written laws, making no effort to match the level of crime vs the ECHR. No attempt has been made to balance the rights of the people in this country to be safe, the criminals rights seem paramount. I've long been a supporter of human rights legislation, but it's time to get out of the ECHR. Make legislation fit for purpose, and not making the UK population a sitting duck.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 07:51 AM
3

It's a twofold problem, first the prisons are much too comfortable, making a sentence something people aren't actually bothered about. This ieads to overcrowding, meaning they kick people out before they served a tenth of her sentence. And the feminists are saying we should close more women's prisons! Genius.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 07:48 AM
1

It's ok, it's a woman's cafe, so she's paying.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 07:27 PM
3

Women can fuck off with that idea.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 07:26 PM
1

@6:28 She thinks she's worth that level of effort?
/r/MensRights14/02/25 07:25 PM
2

Remind her that the 21st is "Steak and a Blowjob" day. If sex is being treated as a gift/reward, then there's no reason why men should feel obligated to try to help her enjoy it. This is presumably part of the slippery slope that leads to separation, but it starts with her attitude that sex is a reward for him.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 07:09 PM
1

Husband thinks getting him cut will benefit him in his adult life when it comes to sex
/r/MensRights14/02/25 03:00 AM
5

Marriage was a good idea, provide security for a woman so she would feel safe to have kids, but it's designed to have safeguards for the man as well. Those safeguards preventing adultery have been eroded by the state and womens rights orgs leaving men with their responsibilities but women with none.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 12:17 PM
4

What, are we making Wednesday family annihilators day? Just came from that other thread. Bloody hell.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 03:57 AM
9

It's not assisted suicide if he didn't show positively that he wanted to die. It's murder.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 03:55 AM
30

"As god intended" is how he came out of the packaging. Anything else is not as god intended.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 12:36 PM
13

It's not your husbands dick. It also comes with risk of consequences, including disfigurement, amputation and death. I can't see any way this is worth a dubious benefit in the far future.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 12:35 PM
2

Tell Nike and the NFL. They aren't listening to this sub.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 01:16 AM
0

It's just there to describe the point, the lawmakers can and should deal with the language. But they won't.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 02:59 AM
1

This is only a question if you are limited with your language in the description, something that law makers tend not to be with this particular subject. "Envelopment by vagina or anus" would deal with it. And no, it shouldn't be rape, and neither should inserting fingers into vaginas be considered rape. It should only be a crime where sexual organs of the perpetrator are stimulated.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 01:14 AM
1

And you can't see how it's relevant? You claim they face oppression, if that were true then surely the word would have got out by now, and they'd stop coming here. This is entirely on how they act in the country, there's been muslims here for a long time, this violence is relatively new.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 06:11 PM
6

Men need to start doing their own jobs. Only their own jobs. If a woman has a job to do and is falling behind, that's on her to fix, if needed she can stay behind to make it up.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 02:39 AM
0

As another note, you think the UK isn't corrupt where there's little opportunity to better it? Starmer is as bought and paid for as any politician, but we won't be able to change him for 4 more years.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 09:25 PM
2

Sure they have, I normally would agree. Until they decide they want to take the country that I've worked to maintain, paid taxes etc, and change it completely to suit themselves. Change the culture, change the laws, change the religion and change the concept of tolerance, all to match the country they just left.. which is NOT under threat or in a state of war. They want to turn the UK in Pakistan pt 2, there are thousands of examples of them claiming this. As I believe I have a right to live in …
/r/MensRights07/02/25 09:13 PM
2

Where did I say they were lazy? Very few of them are risking the lives of their families, there are hardly any women or kids on these. WAHH WAHH WAHH Muh racism. At least be accurate. If anything it's islamophobia, which makes you wonder, are they going to invent religious phobias for other religions? "Extreme stupidity", er no, I've been accurate in what they have done, you haven't pointed out any inaccuracies so far, just went on a rant. Ignorance of history? The history I'm thinking of is the…
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:21 PM
2

Wtf are you burbling on about? I doubt any one of them faced racism in their own countries. They have NO "reason" to be violent, that's what they choose to do. Maybe if morons like yourself stopped giving them such a free pass, they wouldn't be decimating the countries they've invaded.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:14 PM
1

Of course it is, always easier to say something than do it. But there's 2 possibilities: Either they are decent hard-working men coming to build a new life in a new home, in other words the exact people who their home country can least afford to lose. Or they are part of the problem, aggressive criminal types who steal and rape wherever they go, so why should we allow them in here? Whichever it is, there's a good reason for them not being allowed into the country.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 05:29 PM
6

Then they should build one in the country they were born in.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 05:18 PM
1

I'm fine thanks. I've worked on a urology ward, it was as described. They probably dealt with the most extreme cases, but as I said, TURP is still on the list.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:27 PM
7

True in one respect, the difference in women to men in university is more unbalanced than it was, 100 years ago it was 200k more men than women, now it's 1.7 million more women than men.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 05:46 PM
1

I was discussing the traditional surgical procedure, TURP. Options have improved since this was the routine, but it still seems to be the final solution.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 04:55 PM
2

It isn't, or it would be the most common cancer by far. In the UK, about 1 in 8 men will get prostate cancer in their lifetime. So it's still pretty frequent.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 12:57 AM
8

It's like releasing a campaign saying: "This year thousands will die from eating disorders because they are too lazy to make themselves meals and eat." A valid argument. The campaign seems to be done with the intent to say "hey, we do have pro-men campaigns", but aimed to discourage as many men as possible from visiting their doctors. Imagine a campaign to get women to go get cervical smears saying "hey, if you shagged a load of guys at college, you probably caught something. Go get tested you s…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:22 PM
18

I was taught that once a man hits 50, the chance of prostate enlargement is equal to his age. So at 60 it's 60% chance, 70 = 70% chance. It always gets handwaved away, the "men die with prostate enlargement, not because of it" argument, but it's a very unpleasant condition and the treatment is simply horrific. It's definitely not had the research and exposure that breast cancer has, despite being so very prevalent in older men.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:14 PM
4

Hey, you're allowed to play with the charges, make deals with defendants, get a low sentence but still have it count as a win for the prosecution so your political career won't take a hit. Everyone wins. Well, except for the poor sod who got his head blown open. But he's a man, so no one cares. Your legal system at work.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 06:49 PM
9

They can judge all they want, doesn't mean you or anyone else has to listen to them. In a professional setting the rules change. You should expect to be treated respectfully, which doesn't appear to be the case here. You should consider contacting the practise manager or their supervisor, if they have such a thing. If not, try a different therapist, ideally a male one.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 02:41 AM
13

Presumably of breaking the restraining order. AFTER the woman INVESTIGATING AND PROSECUTING THIS said it was the woman who raised the complaint's fault. In any form of a fair or sane society that would be the end of the trial. Nope. Guilty, suspended sentence, fine.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 05:24 PM
3

This was the playbook for Lebanon.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 12:00 AM
5

They're bothered by Hindus and MRAs but not a word about Muslims? How.. very.. bigoted.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 11:59 PM
122

Reading the article, he was charged with contacting her while under a restraining order, she filed a complaint, they arrested him and charged him with it, then the inspector found that the woman had been forcing those attemps. Yet they still charged him, found him guilty, gave him a suspended sentence and fined him. This was not a case of doing what was right. Just a case of doing slightly less wrong.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 11:49 PM
3

How about I don't. You're arguing a lost cause, I understand it's frustrating but the facts are obvious, no matter how much a one-sided study can try to skew statistics. We've seen enough of those from feminists over the years to be able to sniff them out. I don't know if you have made that up, but I'm willing to bet someone did, and I'm not willing to waste more time trying to convince you of that. As a quick note, yes, I fully accept poverty has an effect on crime. Of course it does. You err w…
/r/MensRights29/01/25 07:57 PM
3

Yeah, and you're trying to avoid the reality of life. You can talk about poverty, and self-representation in court, but you don't have any words for the increase in machete fights in high black populated areas? There's a reason why stop and search targets young men in gangs. And picking a fight, getting beat up and robbed makes you the victim of a crime, doesn't it? We're both generalising, you from your pov and me from mine, unless you want to talk about a specific case?
/r/MensRights29/01/25 03:51 PM
1

These are the ones who are promoting discrimination, and they seem to have the authority to push it through. Hold them to their own standards. If they need 20 staff, then 10 of those staff should be men.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 11:21 PM
3

Just because immigrants are outnumbered does not mean they aren't doing their best to top the crime reports. [numbers as an example] if there are 5 million immigrants and 50 mill native British, and the ratio were even, that would show that immigrants are committing 10x the number of crimes the natives are. Anything looking at percentages or comparative fractions [eg. "More than half"] is attempting to obfuscate the truth here. As I suspect you well know.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 11:16 PM
1

So get rid or otherwise remove the imcompetent ones from power. Promote the competent ones.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 11:11 PM
1

Considering stats on staffing by sex are available, would you happen to have the ratio of men to women in HR? If there is a significant difference there, then that's the place to start. Your questions start with one that's impossible to square away, you can either have equal numbers of men and women in IT, or you can maintain quality. Your evaluations show this. Mending trust: you can't, you've shown they are potential casualties in gender wars. All you can do is try to minimise their concerns. …
/r/MensRights28/01/25 11:09 PM
3

Perhaps instead of clutching your pearls, you could notice that there's a huge issue and try to help do something about it.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 06:25 PM
9

Strictly speaking you don't get a say in what she wears. But you do get a say in whether she's your girlfriend or not.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 09:33 PM
77

Fuck off Starmer you cretin. Do something about immigration, you know, the ones who are doing the murdering. Until you do, every death is on your head. And you should damn well be prosecuted for it.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 04:21 PM
10

Because it's of inherent interest to fathers. As the saying goes, it takes two to tango, and fathers should always be consulted when something is happening to their child. But as you say, there's no mention of fathers at all. This is a measure of how society, or at least how society as interpreted by this publication, views fathers. As for that quote, if you're likely to have an acute psychotic episode, the last thing you should have is a baby for a comforter. And babies are not coping mechanism…
/r/MensRights27/01/25 03:46 PM
6

underscores a trend that is not in the interests of children. Quite right. The child is NOT the main point of concern there, the papers authors don't seem to have grasped that.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 03:41 PM
0

She found one third of women ended up back in court within two years, frequently because they have had another baby as a way of coping, and then that child was also being taken into care. I think we've found an answer to the birth rate decline. However, being serious, this is treating people like shit. Yet we also have to notice, the only mention of father on the entire page was a side link to a father being found guilty of murder. Nothing at all in the article. Which is bizarre, as you'd think …
/r/MensRights27/01/25 03:39 PM
13

He should sue the cops for false imprisonment as well. I can understand the need to take a potentially violent suspect off the streets, but to take a month to look at the basic evidence, CCTV, to see if he was in the area or not? That's negligence.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 03:00 AM
1

I'd argue the point based on the post, but the mods got to it.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 06:22 PM
1

Well yeah, seeing as one of them was banned.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 05:06 PM
2

Ahh, but this is the philosophy of men going their own way, which last I heard was considered almost terrorist on reddit, unlike the actual terrorists..
/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:38 AM
5

"Red headed step-child"
/r/MensRights19/01/25 04:12 PM
1

Which tbh is quite reasonable, given that the supposed crime takes place usually behind closed doors with no witnesses and also usually no recordings. And considering that BDSM is making its way into the mainstream the presence of bruises doesn't mean jack either. Add in that quite a few accusations follow a consensual experience and that blows presence of DNA out of the water too. I wouldn't want to be trying to prove something illegal had happened, there's a lot working against it. Unfortunate…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:21 PM
36

"But but false accusations are only 2% of the total!!!" Sure, that's what your tutors say, but it's not what the cops say.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 04:18 PM
3

Because they are convinced by celebrities, by supposed professionals in that field, and their friends that it is a reality. When you meet anyone who believes this is the case, take the opportunity to mentally label them as not worth listening to their opinions.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 03:51 PM
13

Being pleasant or passive towards a Karen is like blood to a shark, she'll take it as weakness and will try to ride right over you. Tell her to screw off as offensively as you can under the circumstances, it minimises the chances she'll come after you.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 02:30 AM
1

I guess you don't spend much time thinking about a situation. Who out of the hostages are the most likely to die in the next 3 months without medical intervention? Who are likely to have the strength to survive? If a certain number of hostages died before being exchanged, how would that affect the diplomatic process now underway? Sure, it sucks that not everyone possible can be returned immediately, but that's the way these things go. The terrorists want assurances, and this is how they go about…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:21 PM
1

The type that knows that this isn't an all out assault on men. You can either be a screaming lunatic pointing at everything, like feminists do, or you can pick your battles for obvious discrimination.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 12:12 AM
0

I've been a MRA since Gamergate, maybe you're judging me on your flawed perception of a single comment. You might want to fix that.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 03:50 PM
0

Do I think men are 2nd class citizens in society? Sure. Do I think this is an example of that? No. How am I "coping"?
/r/MensRights16/01/25 01:59 PM
-35

If they are releasing men over 50 then I think you're overstating this. It's not a case of who matters, more a question of who can handle the stresses of being in captivity like this better than the rest.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:33 AM
1

If the law is discriminatory, but there's a law preventing discrimination, then that screams lawsuit time. Feel free to use the argument that the longer people spend in prison, the less likely they are to be able to adjust to a non-criminal lifestyle on release.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 08:56 PM
1

Marky just did it again.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 02:49 AM
3

Jess Phillips loves it. So long as it doesn't involve protecting kids, she's ok with it.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 02:48 AM
2

Reddit is not impressive in any shape or form, it encourages echo-chambers, insists on dictatorships from the top, and provides absolutely no protection for the average user. The only way to protect yourself from harrassment is to have a separate burner account, ideally not created on the same IP as your main, and use that for the controversial stuff. Or, you can just not give a damn about the admins, post what you will and ignore any backlash. If you are posting anything that's work-related or …
/r/MensRights13/01/25 12:55 PM
6

Yeah, I know, but we have to aim at something don't we?
/r/MensRights11/01/25 12:10 PM
5

I'd be ok with that. I just want the sentencing to be fair and equal for everyone, not more time for me because I'm a white male.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 12:06 PM
27

And with equal rights and equal standing before the law, there should be some wiggle room there.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 11:38 PM
-3

"Don't drop the soap". Come off, SA or rape in prison is at a much higher rate than in the national population.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 08:44 PM
61

how come lawyers don't use these precedents to get their clients reduced sentences?
/r/MensRights10/01/25 08:43 PM
73

10 years of "don't do something you should go to jail for again, or we'll send you to jail for realisies."
/r/MensRights10/01/25 08:42 PM
8

1/ He doesn't know about it, she's doing this on the quiet. 2/ Are we really victim blaming here? I can just hear you drawling "NICE"
/r/MensRights05/01/25 01:03 PM
2

For the paywall https://archive.is/PT8dE
/r/MensRights05/01/25 10:13 AM
10

Strange how this subject gets studied, but "the effects of paternity fraud on fathers and their relationships with their children" doesn't.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 03:57 PM
26

"Free wireless Amber alerts". Free? You mean someone considered charging for these?
/r/MensRights31/12/24 03:52 PM
3

Don't argue with them, they have nothing to offer you. If you must, then empahasise her worth over that of the critics.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 11:32 AM
6

That'd be MGTOW. Which iirc got banned for being a hate group somehow.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 01:39 PM
7

I think the whole point of that sub is that people only use it when they are desperate. If they're being met with that kind of response then if anything that's more likely to push them to harm themselves. I'd say modmail the mods about the issue, but if they've let it get into that state of disrepair then they aren't likely to be much help. Maybe mail them, then take it to the admins if/when you're not satisfied with the answer. Ofc if the admins aren't interested then maybe the press could be.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 10:12 PM
9

There's no reason this woman deserves anonymity. This is a sex-related crime, she should be on a sex offenders registry. It's India. What a surprise.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 02:42 AM
1

If the journalists are sincere in their work As the saying goes, "Ay, there's the rub!". Journalists, politicians, good luck finding one that's honest. If a result can be skewed to fit the agenda, it will be.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 01:42 PM
16

This is not going to do us any good. It's a weakening of the rules against journalists, not improving parental rights. Look at the commentary in the article, all examples given of why men need reporting on more.. paedophile husbands, abusive husbands, murdering fathers, not one example of a woman in there.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 03:55 AM
44

It doesn't say when she was arrested or charged, I'd guess that this was more than a few months ago, meaning she got pregnant since then, presumably as a way to avoid jail. This should be treated as an attempt to pervert the course of justice.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:55 PM
13

Because it's a 2-way street, if you can demand your gf worships you, she can demand the same of you. Which is presumably why lesbian relationships have the highest reported levels of violence. It also makes me wonder exactly how much unreported violence female to male goes on in heterosexual relationships.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 04:41 PM
3

Oh by then it'll be past the Statute of Limitations-[Women] duraction. Yes, I'm feeling a little bitter about this one.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 02:45 PM
3

Budget your money. Some for yourself, some for the family, some for the wife, some for the household. If she decides to give up on sex, then you can decide to give up on paying for her nice things. There's escorts out there who need the money more. Yeah, I know this is very cynical. But given that women seem to only care about what men bring into the relationship, it seems a reasonable response.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 06:21 PM
67

Anyone else sick of hearing the excuses? First offender McGovern was assessed as a low risk of reoffending and someone who did not present a risk to the public. Lord Young said she has suffered from clinical depression and anxiety linked to low self esteem for many years but has made "great strides" towards getting her life together. He said she has weaned herself off illicit drugs which was greatly to her credit and her mental health has improved significantly. This is after they'd decided not …
/r/MensRights19/12/24 06:14 PM
0

That's one way to look at it. I'm not arguing that they deserved anything, just that they were deceived by Labour.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 06:03 PM
1

Sure, I'm not arguing against any of that, like I said I thought they had plenty of notice about it. My point was the reason they're in the news right now is because Labour screwed them.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 06:01 PM
-12

Nah. They've got a right to be pissed right now, last year or the year before the opposition party promised that they'd get a fair settlement. Of course, that opposition party was Labour, and this week Labour have turned round and told them that in exchange for the support for the last couple of years they're going to get nothing. I'd argue that the change in pension age was fully communicated at the time, but that has no bearing on Labour lying and going back on yet another of their promises he…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 02:56 AM
-3

There's no law that only supporters of MRAs can vote in here. Maybe that'd be an idea?
/r/MensRights17/12/24 02:48 PM
14

Most forms of crime.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 06:42 PM
7

Sure, that's a reasonable response, just learn a completely foreign language, spending 20 years or more learning the ins and outs. Instead of you posting what you believe to be a fair translation, because you know that others will be checking what you say. OP was most likely correct in his translations, you just don't like how it sounds. And you shouldn't.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:21 PM
8

Then why don't you put what you believe to be a correct translation for the above passages for us all? Just saying "this isn't what it says" isn't good enough.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 04:43 PM
5

Might be way off base here, but if a married couple decides separately to get therapy, he's the one who usually ends up paying for it. She doesn't see that downside of it.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:08 PM
13

I think this is enough to show that these beliefs are inconsistent with improving men's rights in general.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:05 PM
8

It sounds like they are trying to remove the whole concept of alienation as something women do. And the idea that an expert can't decide if there's alienation, it must be the judge, is them trying to prevent activist judges from being held accountable for bizarre rulings. And getting Charlotte Proudman to comment on the changes? Yeah, that's not biased at all.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 08:52 PM
8

It's simple really. If a woman says "let's split the bill" then gets pissy when you do so, she can't be trusted to be honest, so walk away. No one gives a fuck about the money, it's about seeing if this woman is a good match, a possible partner in life. If she does the above, she isn't.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 02:52 PM
14

You're sending out very confused signals, as if you suspect you know what happened but aren't sure, and then confused that with the irl situation. And this attack on us for no obvious reason that I can see, bizarre. You said you didn't want to judge the mother, but it would be terrible if the dad didn't have a say. I point out that the dad DIDN'T get a say in this, it was done entirely by the mother and you launch into a general shitfest of hostility. If you were trying to make a point earlier, …
/r/MensRights14/12/24 01:06 AM
18

That's exactly what happened.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 10:47 PM
2

Fuck me: "The allegations even resulted in the team having to cancel a game against Georgetown." Priorities are kinda screwed up there aren't they?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 01:41 PM
10

That's the only way you're going to get rid of your draft, by having it apply to women. The outcry that would create would give you a strong platform for arguing that no one should be eligible for the draft. Otherwise, no one gives enough of a damn about men to argue that they need the draft abolishing.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:34 AM
20

What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice and all things nice.. What are little boys made of? Slugs and snails and puppy dogs’ tails.. Start with what you're teaching kids.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 02:21 PM
11

They don’t even have an “anti-men” tag. It's like asking a fish to have a word for water. y’all have a lot to say about women in a sub about men… Argument seems trite and avoiding the real point: the ultimate reason men are unable to get any traction in getting even the law to recognise inequalities is because of feminist attitudes, and feminist politicians. Of course we have a lot to say about feminists, and consequently women.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 02:13 PM
3

That's how the DM gets their clicks. If they put "Slapper with facial construction underway rapes a guy" they wouldn't get half as many.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:17 PM
12

Difference is we know a jury will already be thinking "oh, how sweet and innocent she looks, she couldn't do that" when with a man it's "yeah, he looks the type". She certainly deserves the legal theory of innocent until proven guilty, but let's not try to fool ourselves that there is anything equal about this and the way a man would be treated.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:15 PM
2

Women writers were always able to be published under a pseudonym.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:30 PM
2

The relevant legislation: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/contents Rape is punished by life imprisonment. The text reads (4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life. Which does not seem to give lattitude or a range, it's "guilty of rape? go to jail for life". Sexual assault, which is the maximum offence a woman would be charged with is (b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 …
/r/MensRights08/12/24 02:19 PM
1

Point is, this was 4 years ago. Nothing has, or is planned, to change. The feminists have got their claws into the politicians too deeply for now at least.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 11:39 PM
11

Women can and do rape men, women, kids, and pets. That they get so little attention paid to them for it is the really amazing thing.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 08:46 PM
4

Obligatory response to the post #241 https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/300270
/r/MensRights07/12/24 08:43 PM
25

They say they have made contact with the suspect, but so far no word on an arrest. They have video, they have the stated desire of the victim, what are they waiting for?
/r/MensRights07/12/24 01:59 PM
2

You missed a bit out. Hard core feminists are zealots, unwilling to change their views or their actions no matter the evidence you put in front of them. We've been having these conversations for a decade and more, /r/FeMRADebates used to be a good place to have them up until about 7 years ago when they realised feminists weren't bothering, their principles kept getting hammered, so the mods shifted the rules to support feminism more. Whatever, there's been no significant change in feminists and …
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:31 PM
3

Reddit admins hold the sub to a higher standard than most others, and much higher than feminist subs, if we break the rules conspicuously there's a significant chance they'll ban the sub. I'd say reddit admins suck dog-balls, but that's almost certainly a step up from their usual behaviour.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 09:08 PM
2

Well, one organisation is campaigning to close women's prisons which as we've seen in the summer rioters case has a knock on effect on how many people you can put away and for how long. I wonder what their name is?
/r/MensRights04/12/24 09:05 PM
4

Nice one, thanks very much. Tbh I'm surprised the elementary school numbers are as high as 11%, I thought it'd be less than that. Though I also thought high school would be higher than 40%. It supports a theory I have, that women make their own problems. They complain that boys are brought up badly and have all this toxic masculinity, but with these numbers and knowing that the time a working male gets to spend with his kids is very limited, it's obvious that the biggest influence on boys are ol…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 06:56 PM
2

If you have the stats there, I'd be interested to know percentages of junior/elementary teachers, and highschool/secondary school teachers. I suspect as humans grow up they start to get more male influences, with none at all in the early years.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:52 PM
1

The world is working exactly as feminists want it to right now. Along come MRAs, "hey, we'd like some changes to make it easier for us to live".. and so far we've received... nothing. Now you're saying you want us to go easier, or we might not like the world that turns out? We've had no improvements since we started, if anything we should be ramping up the conflict, not trying to keep the peace. Remember, feminists/suffragettes wanted something, so they organised a letter bomb campaign. We've go…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:50 PM
1

You can do a wall of text if you really want, but it doesn't change the simple fact: Feminists hate men more than MRAs hate women. If you want to stop conflict and hate between the two, you're talking to the wrong side.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:40 PM
1

Men help and support women a hell of a lot more than women support men. It doesn't have to be an organisation to arrange that, we're doing it anyway. Also, MRAs tend not to claim we're doing anything to help women, while feminists always say that their actions benefit men, despite there being some really dodgy assumptions in their conclusions of that.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:25 PM
1

Well, there's a lot more women supporting feminism than men supporting MRA, so I'll let them be the ones to stand up and comproimise in order for any conflict to stop.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:22 PM
6

I can feel some incredible mental gymnastics on the way here.. How is this thread at all to do with women holding men accountable?
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:20 PM
204

Calls on the other male teachers to do better But there's so many more female teachers. Are they not expected to do better as well?
/r/MensRights03/12/24 08:15 PM
21

Good point: stay safe out there.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:56 PM
20

Yeah, this has been an issue for millenia. Hell, I wrote an exam essay on it in 1982 :p [the core point was, someone losing a wallet or purse was more important to them than a famine halfway across the world] It's ONLY once they start to realise that the random joes on the street are fellow humans that empathy is noted, which is why we often get women in this sub who suddenly realised that "kill all men" refers to their sons as well. It tends to be a triggering moment, of awareness and reaction.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:53 PM
10

Half the problem about standing up for women's rights is you still end up getting shit for it. In one particular womens rights issue, I've been supporting them for the past couple of years, and each time I opened my mouth I'd get a variation of "you don't know what we're going through" and "mansplaining". Eventually I called it a day, let them deal with their own problems.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:06 PM
10

We're the ones who get the brunt of those worst examples, the men-hating feminists come right after MRAs. Feel free to prove me wrong. Show where feminists have gone out of their way to support men in real terms, not just "thoughts and prayers", where resources have been allocated to help. Until you can do that I can comfortably continue to believe that feminists are on the supremacist kick.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:59 PM
58

I'm not particularly swayed by this argument. Women remind us constantly how "emotionally intelligent" they are, they may not make the connection between hating on men and misandry, but they know what they are saying is hurtful and harmful. Just because no one else is telling them to stop doesn't mean that little voice inside isn't saying "hold on a sec, this is too far".
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:50 PM
10

It's remarkably similar to the percentage of rape convictions. They seem to believe women never lie. Of course they lie, they lie all the time, probably more than men do. "But they wouldn't lie about rape".. really? After so many high profile proven lies? That myth has died a death.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:28 PM
2

Schoolkid, odds are she's too young to go to jail.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 08:01 PM
9

Ok, now all we have to do is make damn sure all domestic violence against men is documented.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:15 PM
9

This isn't a men v woman situation tbh, it's a western society vs muslim extremism.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:13 PM
5

She shouldn't be allowed in a classroom. Let them homeschool her, but don't put her in a position to be able to harm anyone again.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:10 PM
1

I can't say I'm a fan of the concept either, but it did fit this situation. Apparently the suit got immediately thrown out. Can't say I'm surprised at all. Meanwhile the "Are we dating the same guy" concept goes from strength to strength, the London chapter has 133,925 total members. Sure, patriarchy exists, women are oppressed :p
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:05 PM
4

It's the same with feminists, they want to have the discussions, but not as much as they want to win the debate, and heaven forbid they have to acknowledge that they are talking absolute crap. The only way they can do that is to have full control over the environment, so they ban people with aberrant beliefs. Presumably their mods couldn't handle the number of true faithful getting laughed at in their subs, so they started baanning them before they even got there.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 12:39 PM
1

Sounds like the way real life is nowadays. You say it's "men worshipping women", but don't mention where that comes from. Sure sex is part of it, but over the centuries having kids is likely equally as strong if not more so.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 12:51 AM
4

You might be missing a trick there. The reason paternity tests are taboo is because they offend the people who bring forth the babies. Artifical wombs change that dynamic in a way that has never been done before. It would be attacking the reasons for that privilege, which is likely to be much more effective than just complaining about that privilege.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:25 PM
1

That's not answering the question, what's the difference?
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:09 PM
2

How about protecting everyone from drink spiking? Yeah, that includes the tradition Mickey Finns.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:06 PM
1

What's the actual difference between using the legaal system to silence a political enemy, and the military?
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:04 PM
8

Whatever happens, get the term incel banned by law whatever, there'll be something to replace it within 5 minutes. There will always be a term to ridicule men based on sex or lack of experience. For the same reason, there will always be outcry and denigration for anyone trying to apply derogatory terms to women. Society is built that way, it's designed to protect women by using men. Only a major shift in society, eg after a huge war, can change that. And it'll soon enough revert back once the ra…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:32 AM
15

Women often do fall mysteriously pregnant just before going to jail. Which sometimes stops them going to jail. Then feminists say we don't need the jails anymore..
/r/MensRights24/11/24 11:22 AM
7

Anyone ever tells you to "man up" or "be a real man" walk away. That's a manipulation right there.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 11:41 AM
114

Women don't like men playing games, because when a man plays a game it's so he can enjoy himself, insteaad of working to benefit the woman.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:13 PM
3

https://sportslitigationalert.com/after-suffering-concussion-at-the-hands-of-transgender-athlete-high-school-volleyball-player-becomes-spokeswoman/ https://www.heritage.org/gender/commentary/trans-athlete-injures-multiple-girls-forcing-team-forfeit-wither-thou-feminism Impact is definitely the correct term to use. Of course there are more examples, but this will do for now. And yes, women are not the equal of men when it comes to physical events. When it comes to entertainment [like sports on tv…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 06:21 PM
1

It would make sense that it did, if they insist that rape is a power thing then it would make sense that exerting power goes against someone weaker than yourself. So men->women, women->kids.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 06:10 PM
12

On average, male victims in Greater Manchester take four years to report a sexual assault to the police, and less than 4% of reports result in a charge. Finally we have numbers. So when asked to compare the two, we can answer.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 06:06 PM
1

Take this case for example. A teacher tells people that they should shoot people who don't vote for a female candidate. Now that's encitement, patently illegal. So where is the arrest, the removal in cuffs? Non-existant, because punishment has already been given, he's lost his teaching position. This happens time and again, with only very few academics making it to the courts for their actions, and none afaik from when they were in the classroom. The last I remember was bikelock guy, who was on …
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:52 PM
1

Imo it's the literal definition of terrorism, the threat of violence to get people to vote for a candidate you want them to. The education system in the US is weird. It ascribes many functions of the state to itself, setting legal policies and being the judge and jury of these, and finding ways to ignore what are very serious breaches of the law just because it's a university lecturer. They're only teachers. They aren't that special. "If you can, do, if you can't, teach" applies to all of them. …
/r/MensRights21/11/24 12:07 PM
1

Go say thanks at https://x.com/Finnair/status/1858758418611237182
/r/MensRights20/11/24 04:33 PM
2

Oh that's just because men don't have those special womanly bits that women do, that makes women so special and mystical. What, men have special body parts too? No no, that's just a dick n balls, nothing special about them. And yes, I've had this said to me.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 09:53 PM
16

They're the ones who get aid directly targetted at them, yeah. Was it Haiti where aid workers only gave food to women? Single men were left to starve.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 04:17 PM
9

That's why you should never believe anyone saying "money isn't everything".
/r/MensRights19/11/24 04:14 PM
27

If society won't give a damn about me, why should I give a damn about society?
/r/MensRights19/11/24 03:06 PM
13

Money isn't everything, lack of enough money is everything. If you live in a country where everything is priced, and you need money for something, eg healthcare, or food for the kids, etc, it becomes all-important.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:44 PM
2

That's quite positive for Australia, the dinner, an event for men being sold out! I'm impressed. I know it's one event in the whole of a continent, but it's more than I remember hearing about for last year.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 12:49 PM
9

No one under any circumstances is going to shoot a leg. Either it's life-threatening [yours or someone else's] in which case you shoot centre mass, or it's not life-threatening in which case you don't shoot at all.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 10:46 AM
29

Then wtf should any man pay taxes towards upkeep of the police force? This is a home invasion, and they shot the victim. Just to highlight who the bad woman was, she was wearing a black hoodie, he was in his underwear. They still shot the guy. They'll undoubtedly say he was armed with a knife, not that he was struggling for possession of a knife. What really got to me was the "Drop the knife bang". There was absolutely no time for him to even process the instruction let alone attempt to carry it…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 10:35 AM
1

Egalitarianism, I'm absolutely all for that. Feminism, that's been way too corrupted by actions of others to have any credibility nowadays. They are the ones responsible for the M&Ms attitude towards men nowadays, for the decrying of men and masculinity in the press and other media, the ones who believe that for "our" side to be treated better "your" side has to be treated worse. There are very few feminists who claim to be egalitarians, and even fewer who can show they follow through on it. The…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 12:29 PM
30

Sorry to say this, but that law school sounds damn awful. Do they honestly consider this an adequate preparation for real life cases?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:32 AM
2

Of course it does. But that's the entire fabric of feminism nowadays, and of men's problems with it.. double standards across the board.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:14 AM
3

Last time we had a solid attempt to get that discussed back in 2020: https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/300270 It'd be nice if we had one political party we could support that had our interests at heart.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:12 AM
4

Not really, it's the reality we all live in, only deluded idiots don't understand it. I feel sorry for the girls and women who have to compete beyond their abilities because of someone else's shitty ideology.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 11:15 PM
17

There's the "boys can't be raped" daft take we have here, but more importantly it depends what they actually charged her with. If they said she was charged with rape when she wasn't they'd be liable for damages.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 01:40 PM
4

The Star really screwing up it's automation there Fun stuff
/r/MensRights14/11/24 01:37 PM
1

I get that subs want to be able to ban contributors that do not meet their standards. I don't get why users aren't able to ban subs from appearing in their lists that don't meet the users standard. Unless there's a RES option that I'm missing?
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:18 AM
5

I think it's less they want to destroy society, as opposed to they can't see how their actions have an effect on everyone else. You spit at someone every day for a week, and they'll stop walking towards you.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:58 AM
6

Let's be straight. The victim here is the dead guy. By all accounts what happened was consensual, she said nothing about being coerced or forced. If she didn't want to destroy his life she has a weird way of showing it. Straight to his friends, to the point where he's being threatened. She knew exactly what she was doing there. I'm trying to be polite by calling him her lover. As opposed to she was his fuck-bunny. Again, he's dead, she's fine, how is she the victim? I hope the courts support his…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:16 AM
4

No one believes them "Nice" The likelihood of it being turned round to "he raped me" Embarrassment. They think it's no big deal. They don't want to get someone else in trouble. They wanted it to happen. I could probably go on, but that's enough to be going with. I'm not sure of the relevance to my point above though.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:12 PM
9

Do you know the chinese whispers game? One person says something to the next, in private, and then they pass on the same message to another. After a few more iterations they say what the message is to the group: it's usually changed beyond all recognition. She used the word "uncomfortable" in talking to her friends about this. To me that sounds like remorse after the fact, she's uncomfortable with the potential effects on her friends group. It's entirely possible she implied more than she meant,…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:21 PM
9

This isn't a false allegation, just an inference of feeling "uncomfortable". Moving on from rape accusations to "everything wasn't perfect, there were no violins playing in the background or roses, which has got to be his fault, hasn't it?"
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:06 PM
8

That's a huge problem then. If they can't open their mouths to say they love their husbands and don't agree that men are the cause of all the woes in the world, then what good are they? If they can't or won't speak up, they are condoning what's being said and done.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:08 AM
2

Really? No. terrorism /tĕr′ə-rĭz″əm/ noun The use of violence or the threat of violence, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political goals.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:34 PM
3

That's the thing, we can all see political feminism doing some really insane things that create harm for women [and men ofc, but that's debatable if it's a problem for them], and we rightly mock those. Feminism could offer a lot to the world, as this woman is doing, but while they are more concerned about politics and filling the pockets of their leaders they'll not do anything worthwhile.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:13 AM
6

This initiative includes studies on how online platforms, including media environments and the 'manosphere', influence the mental health of young men. By building a community of practice across Australia, this partnership aims to develop evidence-based strategies that inform future funding and service delivery in the field of healthy masculinities. Any bets that they'll decide the manosphere is harmful to men?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:02 AM
42

Considering the means she rose to fame in the first place as well..
/r/MensRights04/11/24 09:50 PM
3

Nowadays shame is not a part of society, except for men it seems, and by that I mean it applies to men only. If Trump is going along with the rest of the world in ignoring it, that's ok.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 09:09 PM
5

Guessing you've already got the NFL etc, where men's locker rooms are open to the public after a game but not the women's.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:50 AM
1

I think we should stop giving shit posts like this one clicks. Ho hum.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 08:59 PM
5

What I said. Just put it in an archive. If you see others post links to articles like this, ask them to do that as well.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 04:40 PM
9

First off, I think we should stop giving shit posts like this one clicks. If you must link their articles then use an archive.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 04:36 PM
5

Iirc it has for next year or something like that. If they ever considered how and why they have the viewing figures they used to have, due to so many SAHMothers watching daytime TV, well, they wouldn't change any of it because there's too little going on in these women's skulls.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:42 PM
3

Its' going to take quite a while for that to happen though, the laws are still slanted in women's favour, as are social support systems.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:40 PM
2

The option of being able to point and laugh at a feminist for saying something so stupid as either sex doesn't need the other is too desirable to be denied.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:37 PM
21

Over-crowded, yet western birthrates have fallen through the floor. Women aren't keeping up to their part of the deal.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:35 PM
39

Probably not going to get a lot of support for this, but I think any society that uses the Duluth model as a guide should be considered corrupt. Imo anyone living there that suffers the "he's violent so I should get everything I want" treatment should sell up immediaely and leave for an unextradictable country. He's not going to get fair treatment in the courts over his property or his kids, so why even try?
/r/MensRights30/10/24 07:17 PM
2

I really wouldn't wish for that if I were you. There's a very solid example of how moderation, or the pendulum swinging the other way, does not have to happen at all with an extremist society. It does if it's opposed, but the way things are going right now, the opposition to extremist views is weak, and do not look to be carrying any arguments. Weirdly, one of the two extremes is supporting the other.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 04:37 AM
2

Also, thinking about it, making it anonymous makes it more like valentines gifts. Put your name on them, there's no reason not to.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 10:12 PM
6

It shares a day with the more-celebrated "International toilet day". Google will certainly not be doing a doodle for men. If you're concerned about people thinking you're flirting, you could change your middle line to "I want to change that for all of you". I doubt anyone would take a group gesture that way, but this is belt and braces.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 10:05 PM
6

I'd argue the point tbh, we have discrimination and poor treatment of men because no one considers them worth treating any better. Half the time that includes the men themselves. Sure it won't change the world, but it'll change some things for those men, and that's a start.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 09:59 PM
1

Do it. You'll be [pleasantly] surprised by some of the reactions you get, but take some tissues with you anyway.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 09:56 PM
12

That's the feminist argument. We've got a 21 or thereabouts week limit on abortion in the UK, and I'm fine with that, most people are afaik. Feminists still try to blame men for not wanting it allowed up until 9 months.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 02:17 AM
1

Had one for a decade or so now.The times I've had to give CPR it's been part of the job, and mouth to mouth wasn't required, patient intubated and bagged.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 08:41 PM
3

Probably true, but the type of women who are talking about this are not the type to handle firearms.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 11:28 AM
3

Most likely, but I suspect most of us can differentiate between a real insanity plea and one that smells iffy. This seems to be legitimate, and a really sad case of slow intervention that allowed the daughter to be killed.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 02:22 AM
5

It really wouldn't. Well, it might for a short time, but who is going to enforce a curfew, and how are they going to deal with men who break it?
/r/MensRights26/10/24 01:32 AM
29

As always, feels over reals. "There's a lot of fear you feel as a woman" yet men get murdered a lot more. The question really should be "Why is the imagined fear of a woman more important than the real danger men are in?"
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:37 PM
1

A year ago. Nothing more recent?
/r/MensRights23/10/24 02:25 AM
1

If you have one.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 12:52 AM
22

It's not a society thing, it's a woman casting other women out for not supporting the herd.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 02:36 PM
3

Strange how he forgot to mention how men still have to marry women in all those categories, abd those women get a lot more support from society than even the good men do. Wasn't there a study published recently, saying women are much more attracted to the aggressive anti-social personality types than friendly men? Seems the poster doesn't know what he's talking about.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 01:38 AM
1

Yeah, thought so. I'm a nurse in the UK, mouth to mouth is optional for us, not required for the average citizen, and not taught to them.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 01:27 PM
2

Good technique helps, body directly over the torso arms straight and locked, use your weight as the force to compress, not your muscles. My one complaint is that paramedics use a metronome to keep time for compressions, not Stayin Alive.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 02:51 AM
1

Where are you?
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:51 PM
6

No reason for any adult not to be trained in this, it's pretty straightforward. And yeah, I get that panic, but it only lasts a few seconds. The real problem is people not being able to keep the rate up, so have someone ready to tag in after a couple of minutes.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 04:36 PM
32

The BEST CPR instruction video. you will ever see. [This is UK protocol, US varies I'm sure, just thought you'd like to see this]
/r/MensRights16/10/24 02:11 PM
63

That's been removed from CPR protocols because so many refused to do CPR because they might need to do mouth to mouth.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 01:50 PM
26

On behalf of rich fathers on behalf of black fathers How about on behalf of fathers.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 01:08 AM
2

It's been apparent for a decade that boys get treated like shit when they are younger. Some feminists like to try to justify it by saying "it's being fair" or "it's to support girls". Along comes Billie Piper, says "stop treating boys like shit" and gets jumped. In fact she said: But I think it starts with your messaging. It doesn’t start with telling boys that they’re all awful. That’s not going to work. There’s been a problem with that historically.” Idgaf if she's saying it to try to improve …
/r/MensRights15/10/24 07:10 PM
2

Sooner or later some of the less critical-thinking-equipped people in here are going to have to realise, it's not because she's a woman, it's because of what she is saying that she deserves criticism. If you don't agree, then you can't complain when feminists do the "not all men, but always a man" thing.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 07:05 PM
13

Because to feminists, the righteousness of feminism is obvious and unassailable. A woman couldn't possibly think there was anything wrong with it. So there must be a different reason, and being a slut is the obvious one to them. So "pick me". It doesn't say much for how feminists see women though.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 07:28 PM
32

Advocating violence to achieve a political end. What's the name for that again?
/r/MensRights14/10/24 02:26 PM
15

Sure, but for the few who actually watched the video they'll know the truth.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 08:44 PM
37

At least the video shows her hitting him first, for what that's worth.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 07:07 PM
28

Think that's what he means.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:55 PM
-6

And again, what did SHE say that was misandrist? If you can't point to anything, then you can't criticise her. If you can, then point it out, and we'll all give her a deserved kicking. Doing the Gina Carrera witch hunt is a really bad look for you.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 04:43 PM
2

This is important, I'm not bothered about defending Billie Pipers position, she can do that herself. The point I'm trying to make is that we can either be like feminists, accuse, convict and sentence someone based on what we assume they mean, or we can a maintain long-held MRA position of seeing what people actually say. Tarring and feathering someone based on what you think they said, or how skewed you can interpret it, is what feminists do, not what we do. In fact we've been pointing out their…
/r/MensRights11/10/24 03:35 PM
0

So she didn't say anything misandrist.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 02:56 PM
-1

what did she say that was misandrist? Not.. "what do I assume she means because I think she's misandrist" what did she say that was misandrist?
/r/MensRights11/10/24 02:27 PM
-2

This is limited based on her position, what did she say that was misandrist?
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:47 PM
4

She's done quite a bit. The big ones weres Secret Diary of a Call Girl, Penny Dreadful, and something a year or two ago called I Hate Suzie.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:45 PM
1

Because not all men believe this is wrong. A lot of them haven't thought about it, or realise how badly it can and will affect them. Biggest problem is though, that the women who encouraged this to become law use the "all women are affected by this", like the body autonomy argument, it becomes something else than a money grab. And women vote as well as men.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:25 PM
3

This is the problem with "no-fault" divorces. Everyone can get married, everyone can get divorced whenever they feel like it, ofc there might be some financial issues to work out [most of the income going to the wife] but that doesn't matter, everyone is free to do what they want!! [Sing in a happy voice] It means there's no reasons needed to get divorced, so causes don't matter. So yeah, the husband will almost always have to pay alimony.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 12:38 PM
7

That's the point of the article, to find a scapegoat for the film being crap and losing a TON of money. Not the directors and script writers, no, not us, never!
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:19 PM
4

I was wondering who that in the trailer was.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:17 PM
2

It's the Metro. Using the word journalist to describe their employees is getting it to do really heavy labour there.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:15 PM
22

Governments are able to ban girls from being circumcised, so why not ban it on boys as well. You know, just for that semblance of equality.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:04 AM
18

Iirc the Hippocratic oath, the original one, has a line or two banning the prescribing of abortifacients. You could play some word games to say "but that's not banning surgical intervention", but we know what the original intent was. Trying to force someone to do something they literally took an oath to say they wouldn't do, that's really over the top.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:02 AM
23

To be fair, she probably believes she's telling the truth, she's not the brightest bulb out there.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 01:57 AM
16

And this will go down as another example of male on male violence, everyone will forget that without her stirring the pot none of it would have happened.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 10:43 AM
8

Fewer than already are? Women priviliege strikes again. All the excuses they use to reduce women going to prison apply to men as well.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 10:41 AM
7

Not as much as on men who get conscripted...
/r/MensRights22/09/24 09:00 PM
1

Just far enough away for everyone to forget about it when it doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:19 PM
5

From what I've read, Boy and girl scouts are not associated. Boy Scouts decided it wanted to go for all kids, Girl Scouts didn't. That's it.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 04:51 PM
2

Absolutely. If anyone has had unfair treatment by a judge, this is the opposite of that, an entirely fair, rational, just way to resolve this. Sure it'd be lovely if she could bang her gavel and everything was fixed, but she's limited in her powers so she can't do that. What she can do, and did, was give him her best advice [hire an attorney] and best of all, give him hope he'll see the end to this with a ruling that is fair all round. This is how judges are supposed to behave, it's a shame so f…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:15 PM
10

I can't imagine a judge treating a male "defendant" better than she did here, I was so very surprised and pleased with her position.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:07 PM
12

Well, there's some justice left in the world. "Mr Vasquez, I assume you disagree with prosecution?" "Yes your Honour". "Good, because so do I". It looked like he was respresenting himself, judge told him to go hire an attorney. Well done that woman.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:04 PM
-1

I think there's a couple of ways of looking at this. Most have gone with the "what about the men?" argument, which is valid but imo not the point here. The other way is to say "there are women missing, and feminists claim that women are their right and only purview, so where are they?" as a call to action to do anything, rather than just sit out or do the "free palestime" thing most seem to be happy with. It's less about the women missing and more about the lack of action from political groups t…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 05:23 PM
1

I don't think there is. Just courts are starting to take them seriously and papers are more willing to report it.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 05:32 PM
6

It's a start, I'm not sure about perverting the course of justice compared to perjury, but 2 years inside and a criminal record is better than usual. They should be registered as well imo, but we can't expect everything at once.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 04:04 AM
1

Not my point, my point was the ending of the Graduate was him wanting to be with someone his own age. But these older women look at it and think it gives them the green light to go after kids.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 07:50 PM
2

I think the problem is that people have seen The Graduate, and forgotten how it ends.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:46 PM
2

Not my course of choice tbh, someone in that position might decide they've nothing to lose, and do whatever the hell they want.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:43 PM
6

I'm not sure rehab is possible, but they keep on trying, and failing. Iirc there's a [?]Eastern European country that's considering physical castration to deal with the problem. My question is, what do they plan to do about the women offenders?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:40 AM
7

Social media has been the downfall of society. Not really. I get your take above, and I share it, but for all the weirdos and perverts coming out of the woodwork, I would rather know the extent of the problem than be blind to it. Imo the real danger to children is not the pedos going after them, but the lack of effective law enforcement to deal with it. A crime that's considered one of the most brutal and unjustifiable should not be treated with suspended sentences.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:14 AM
43

So boys, 11+ is ok, girls has to be 20+. We're talking less about women's rights here than woman being barking insane, and or having very dodgy intent towards boys.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:10 AM
2

It's pure selfishness. "What I want is matters and is the only important thing. Nothing else matters, so I can ignore it."
/r/MensRights26/08/24 03:41 PM
4

Well, that's the end of domestic violence cases in Spain for the time being, anyone being charged with them can use the same tactic to get out of it until they change the law saying women can't be imprisoned for DV. And what kind of stupid law is that? Say a woman cuts her husbands arms and legs off, you're saying she can't be sent to prison for it?
/r/MensRights24/08/24 03:23 PM
4

Because they like to believe that womens rights and feminism are interchangeable, the same thing. So if you argue against feminism, you're opposing women's rights. And virtually all men's rights arguments oppose feminism. Feminism and women's rights are manifestly not identical, in some cases directly opposed to each other, but this is one of the way feminists maintain their narrative.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 01:57 AM
2

That proves nothing tbh. It can lead to loss of a testicle, but it doesn't stop the other one from working. It can lower fertility chances, but even a really low chance can come up. ed: apparently it turns out he is the father.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 09:43 PM
21

This is a socially awkward woman trying to shade a man for... nothing at all in particular.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 07:12 PM
7

Time to push back against feminism in Australia, it's just supporting paedophiles.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 05:24 PM
27

That's an incredibly weak response. "I've been fruitful and multiplied".. we're not talking about sex for reproduction, but sex for pleasure. There is an easy comparison that can be made, men who were circumcised as adults. And quite a lot of them report loss of sensation. And just because millions of men have had it done, does not mean it's not a grave violation of bodily autonomy. "eat shit, billions of flies can't be wrong!" I guess he's one of the "if I get the last word in I win" type debat…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:41 PM
10

I thought you were going to do a comparison between circumcision and "gender affirming surgery" there, the ear piercing one seems a bit tame. I've never heard of anyone getting gangrene in their ears after ear piercing, and needing their ears amputating before.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:36 PM
24

Michelle Solis, 46, of California, was sentenced last month to the maximum term of four years in prison following her guilty plea for having sex with a minor and sending harmful photos to a minor. That's the maximum. Somehow a California judge gave a woman rapist the max sentence! this must be wrong, can someone fact-check it please?
/r/MensRights14/08/24 02:21 PM
5

Looks like she's weaponising your son against you there. Might be worth telling your son the whole truth.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 08:31 PM
2

Ding ding! That's how I think it's working nowadays.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:12 PM
3

Of course. If it's not rape then no one cares, especially the judges.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:09 PM
6

It's Jess Phillips, the MP who tried to blame the heckling she received from muslims at her election results as men hating her, ignoring the other candidate that they wanted to win. She's an out and out psycho, I think her quote sums her up: "Fear and hatred can be the things that drive you. I don't always think of fear as a bad thing, it gives you fight-or-flight" She's an MP controlled by fear and hatred. Not fit for office.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:58 PM
2

No, that time was years ago, back when some insane subs were sending child porn to try to get other subs banned.. Reddit is what is politely known as "ideologically captured", nothing will cause them to ban feminist excess.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 10:13 AM
1

/r/MensRights02/08/24 08:59 PM
4

I'm aware of teachers abusing the children in their care, what I was thinking about is millions of stay-at-home mothers, where this could easily be happening but they aren't quite so stupid as to sell $10 videso of them abusing the kids.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 08:13 AM
9

What if, we don't see most of the crimes against children, because we naively assume that they are safe with their mothers?
/r/MensRights30/07/24 06:28 PM
2

Cheers, I do try.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 10:44 AM
5

My favourite one was in SG1, where T'ealc lived off base. One of his neighbours was a young attractive girl, who knocked on his door and when he answered just raised on her toes a small distance and fell onto her heels, a really small movement. She was nicely developed, and was wearing a fairly low cut top. The effect was to make her boobs bobble just a bit, to draw attention to them. She did it a few times in the show, so obviously not an accident.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 10:40 AM
64

11 years old? Wtf? There can't be any "he's mature for his age" or "It's only a technicality" crap there. My god, the patriarchy is really coming down hard on women paedos.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 10:39 PM
4

Well, that's Jess Phillips for you. Female Supremacy, it's what it's all about.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 04:31 PM
1

No, the liberals gained 70 seats but Labour are in power, straight left-wing.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 12:00 PM
3

We can see what's coming next: child support. Alternatively, find a way to get her charged with sexual assault, take custody of the kid once it's born, and she can pay the support. [very unlikely, but I'd love to see it] You have our sympathy mate, good luck.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:54 AM
2

Yeah, though in her case the voters are coming at it from a completely opposite direction.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 09:57 AM
2

Tbh with the way things are going I doubt she'll win her next re-election, she's not exactly flavour of the month with her constituents.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 09:46 AM
20

Very much so.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 05:29 AM
15

And how long does she hope her political career will last? 20 years? Isn't that a coincidence.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 05:29 AM
3

Young men can and are being radicalised by the governments complete contempt for them, and lack of any kind of empathy or support. Don't try to blame the far right for this, these men would never be interested in extreme politics if the mainstream politicians hadn't completely let them down first. If men are such a concern, where is the Ministry for Men? Why are men counted under the Violence against Women and Girls act? Why are some MPs allowed to target men with incredible vitriol yet with no …
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:10 AM
1

I love how they tacked the comparison between men and women right at the bottom as an afterthought.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 10:25 AM
5

Assisting someone with ritual suicide even if they wanted to carry on living used to be legal in India.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:28 AM
6

I wonder when these girls are going to realise it's a two way street. You can't keep shitting on someone and expect them to drop everything to help you out, there has to be at least some motivation to want to help you. Treating men decently would go a long way towards that.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:02 AM
1

Lay it all out exactly as it happened, in as much detail as you can manage. Stress that it was not by your consent. Any retaliation that comes because of this is very lawsuit-able. Who advised you not to contact HR btw?
/r/MensRights13/07/24 08:49 PM
12

Sounds like an email to HR is needed, just to cover your bases, so that if/when a real problem arises it's not as though they can say they had no idea.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 08:29 AM
3

Problem is once you get your face known on there for anything it becomes a magnet for future posts. I'd avoid any form of interation with this crappy site, there's no saying how it could come back to bite you in the future. eg, your current relationship fails for whatever. Your next gf, love of your life, has a moment of weakness, posts you on there, and lo and behold your previous post comes to life and your new relationship becomes toast. Avoid.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 08:25 AM
1

It shouldn't be difficult to avoid those, first time prisoners with no record of violence should be the target here. Mostly looking at people inside for personal drug use, non-payment of fines [due to having no money], that sort of thing. Those who got sent to prison for want of a better option on how to deal with them. I'd err on the side of caution, but this should clear out a reasonable chunk of the population.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 05:33 PM
5

The 1/3s divisions described by OP seems to fit the general understanding of prison populations, so doing something about that would be very beneficial, IF it's under his remit. Removing non-violent offenders from prison and putting them to rehab would clear a lot of space in prisons, allowing the justice system to appropriately sentence those violent offenders who are getting suspended sentences right now. This would appear to be something for the courts to take on, how fast they can do it come…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 05:21 PM
21

Bloody hell. The judge in this case should be morally and legally culpable if anything happens to that kid.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 06:27 PM
2

Sounds like a plan, hope it works out for you.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 12:55 AM
1

Faces a sentence of 20 years in prison if she breaks her probation? This isn't a trivial offence then, and they tell her "ok, just don't do it again"?
/r/MensRights06/07/24 03:12 PM
23

It's not the paper, it's the law. If the paper says she raped a schoolkid then she sues them for a nice little nestegg when she gets out. Take a look at one time we tried to get this changed.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:40 PM
5

Could be, excluding women from anything will usually lead to accusations of homosexuality, it's part of the standard armoury nowadays. Which is funny when you consider they consider homophobia to be evil, except when they do it.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 02:41 PM
7

So be it. Seems like most of those comments come from men, or boys, so let them think what they want. If they ever grow up past the Beavis and Butthead stage, they mght reconsider.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 12:46 AM
0

I suspect the suffragettes felt differently, seeing as they were outnumbered even on the female side.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 01:12 AM
5

Shaye Groves slit 25-year-old Frankie Fitzgerald's throat California woman who fatally stabbed boyfriend over 100 times avoids prison Teen who murdered boyfriend in 100 mph crash had toxic relationship with him I'd say there's plenty of men dying from women's attacks. It just seems to fall out of the news so quickly for some reason.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 04:06 PM
12

I think we're way past needing to ask which sex is the oppressed one. The real question nowadays is, what are we going to do about it?
/r/MensRights28/06/24 01:18 AM
14

Weird how all these "How can you subject our daughters to the dangers of war" seem not to give a damn about subjecting their sons to the rigors of war. Even that guy with the burned face who should be aware of the consequences to men wasn't interested. Having said that, I don't think the Dems are serious about it, or they would have brought this in much sooner, odds are it won't get passed before election. I suspect the Dems are playing it the way they did last time, trying to force concessions …
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:37 PM
0

That's a solid basis for deciding on an electorate, but it's not what anyone's dealing with right now.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:19 PM
2

There we go. Imo, [not a mental health expert] I'd say it's time to gtfo. Being in this relationship is doing you a world of harm. You should talk to your doctor, and then a good divorce lawyer.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 12:29 PM
2

I think you need to be looking for a fresh start. Your wife appears to have no positive emotions for you, and facing that constantly as well as her disparging remarks is bound to make anyone anxious. How long have you had anxiety/depression?
/r/MensRights18/06/24 09:29 PM
6

without escalating the conflict or invalidating her feelings. Obviously she doesn't give a damn about invalidating your feelings. Unless she's willing to go to therapy this doesn't look good.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 12:41 AM
3

Damned if you freeze, Damned if you punch the woman who is sexually assaulting you in the face. If you say "man up" to someone in this situation, that's what you're saying, use violence to resolve the situation.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 12:20 AM
7

Just add it to the list of privileges that women already have.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 10:55 PM
2

True, I've heard many good things about male gynaecologists, from both sides of the tracks.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 07:03 PM
1

She can refuse the surgery if she wants, that's her choice. She still gets to pay for the staff they assembled for her, and she then still gets to go elsewhere to find a team she feels is acceptable to her. If she was saying she didn't want a black doctor, would you still think she's right?
/r/MensRights13/06/24 11:40 AM
3

That could explain it. Men going into gynae know they are doing something outside their own experience, so will be listening really carefully. Women going into gynae have two issues, they think they know all about it because their bodies fit, and also they think this is their territory so they will be naturally better than others, which would lead to the many "women gynae doctors are bad/brutal" stories you hear. And yeah, some ideologically driven subs have a ban on any interaction on this and …
/r/MensRights13/06/24 11:30 AM
3

No they aren't. The likelihood is really high but there's no guarantee any nurse will be female. Half the doctors are women nowadays, but there's still the chance an all-male crew will come up.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 11:22 AM
1

Ok, take her back to the ward, arrange her discharge. She had all the preparation, had all the experts there in that room then wasted their time. She still pays for that.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 11:21 AM
9

The menslib sub is set up by feminists to be "controlled opposition", where they can raise the issues men have so as to be able to say they are addressing them, but not in any way that might cause anything to get done about them. It's very heavily moderated/controlled, speech isn't allowed to get out of hand there. I wouldn't let it worry you, we had one yesterday reposting from here to one of the anti-incel subs, as usual with no interest in the actual issue, and no understanding of what was th…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 09:41 PM
-8

Ok, this is going to be a little out there, but I'm feeling that way out today. Women are not natural warriors, and have significant limitations in fighting, so they should be given a choice. Either go along with being drafted into whatever service role is required of them, or they can stay home, be protected and provided for. The catch? They are required to produce one child for every year of service they don't provide. This can be either through normal methods or IVF which would be supplied. F…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 04:59 PM
19

This will undoubtedly draw the "but no one's been drafted in 50 years, no one's going to be drafted" type comments. The obvious answer is, "if no one's going to be drafted, then why are they bothering with this?"
/r/MensRights10/06/24 04:52 PM
6

My apologies for being male, and having a "male centric view". Seems like the rest of the world has catered enough to the female centered view, so I'm just looking at a different perspective. Tbh you fall in line with the argument I was making earlier. People will whinge about whatever you do, so pay them no attention, they generally aren't worth it. And you are completely bonkers if you think looking at someone is "victimising" them. And I'll happily continue to believe that people wearing mini…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 04:50 PM
4

It's possible, but not very likely, especially when women often set up cameras to "catch" anyone glancing in her direction. My point wasn't about the attention though, it was about the "you're evil for looking". Nope. "Victim" blaming, sure... strictly speaking the victim is the guy who's attention was ambushed by the girl's dress choices. Just because someone dresses outside of the norm doesn't mean they're seeking attention. In maybe 1 in 100 cases. The rest of the time, sure they are. And tbh…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 04:39 PM
32

This is something worth pushing back on. If women go out of their way to wear as minimal an outfit as possible, then they can't complain about men looking at them for it. No matter the incredibly weak arguments that "we dress like this for ourselves", it's obvious they do so for mens attention, with the intent of trying to guilt trip a man for looking, if he's not one that they themselves desire. Time to disagree. Don't accept the guilt trip, if she starts to call you out tell her if she doesn't…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 11:33 PM
2

You still here? Give it a rest.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:41 PM
2

one is normal and the other is less normal. No, both are perfectly normal. Just as calling a man male is. Some people are trying their level best to find reasons to be offended. Stop being so pathetic.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:52 PM
2

Context is key, both are fine. Complaining about either is childish.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 01:16 PM
25

English. She is female. Only a cretin would think there's a problem with that.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:25 PM
11

instead take their grievances to the online “manosphere’s” dark corners, where they exact revenge among a receptive, misogynistic audience. So this is a Manosphere's dark corner? Considering the vitriol Slate and similar have thrown at men over the years, I'll stick with the hiding in shadows, thanks.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 01:27 PM
3

Rememeber that there's no censorship on this sub, and no "ban the evil feminists" so you will get people who agree with and prosetylise such beliefs. If you don't agree with them, say so. While I agree with the no censorship policy, I think that regular offenders should get their yellow star, flaired to show their position. Then if they don't agree with their flair, they can say so.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:49 AM
11

Depends on the method of murder, but it's never worse than a bear eating you alive.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 04:52 PM
5

I can't understand why her identity is protected. Anyone who knows her personally will know the situation, anyone who doesn't won't be able to link the child to her. So why is her ID concealed?
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:42 AM
28

Front lines or dead?
/r/MensRights05/06/24 11:44 AM
33

The teenage mother faces up to 15 years in prison if convicted of trading her child. so we're expecting she gets probation, or a suspended sentence.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 11:44 AM
27

Showing significant hypocrisy is not petty.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 10:55 AM
-3

Because someone is going to have to pay for it, they won't expect the mother to do so, and the state isn't going to do it, so that just leaves the father, whether he wants to be a father or not.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:55 PM
2

Plausible deniability. It reduces any outrage over the statutory rape, and if a mob somehow comes after her for this she can say she misread the date, thought he was older. [Ignoring the whole abuse of authority issue ofc]
/r/MensRights03/06/24 03:04 PM
10

Article says that there were discrepancies between her description of the attacker, and the convict, it's not clear if she did an ID in court [or even if that ever actually happens]. I don't think she maliciously named him for it.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 11:09 AM
17

Yeah, he could have been out in 6, but because he didn't own up and say he did it [when he didn't] he stayed in another 11 years. The parole system is appalling.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 11:06 AM
15

Unfortunately it's not a joke this time, that's exactly how this article reads.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 11:05 AM
1

Sounds about right. It's impressive how fast feminists go from normal conversation to raging, throwing insults around and doing all kinds of unreasonable things, doxxing etc, when they can tell they are not carrying the day in a discussion. I wonder what that study said about the chances for short-term, one off sexual encounters were for more masculine men? [I think I'm in trouble again]
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:55 AM
1

"Give me five sentences and I can convict him". No matter how we try to dress up our language, there's going to be no way to avoid charges of misogyny from bad actors [actresses?] I suppose I could have said "amputate their mammary glands" it would have meant the same thing but then some readers wouldn't have a clue what I was talking about, and I'd still attract the same opproborium.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:49 AM
26

And women live longer if you cut their tits off. Has a huge benefit of no breast cancer, we don't need those pink months anymore, and so on.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 06:46 PM
1

How much does 18 years of child support add up to?
/r/MensRights31/05/24 03:40 AM
23

Just a quick note, if you're going to write a rant, feel free, but put some paragraph breaks in it. That's the dreaded wall of text that is almost unreadable. Just a couple would make a big difference.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 07:38 PM
1

Not been to see a film since before covid. Sooner or later they may sort themselves out, I'm not holding my breath.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 10:01 AM
2

For context.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:43 PM
7

Hot sauce has a good rep as well.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 07:36 AM
6

Pretty much that, yes.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 07:54 AM
4

Not sure about insane, imo incredibly self-centered, cares not a thing for anyone else, all that matters is how they affect her. She murdered her dad, but what matters is that she is an orphan now. However, that line though "I am the best parts of him." How twisted do you have to be to think you're the best bit of someone you just murdered? Hell, you're probably right, she's completely nuts, and as of this moment, walking around on the streets.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 06:09 AM
30

Self-serving, in other words. Just seen the website, astounding quote from the murderer on there: “The prosecution has tried to make me look like a monster but that’s not me and never was,” Imirowicz told the judge, saying her father was her “hero” and “best friend.” “One of the biggest things overlooked in this case is that me and my siblings lost my dad, too. ... I am the best parts of him. I’m his daughter. But without him I don’t know who I am any more,” she told the judge. No, you're the on…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 09:12 PM
1

Thanks for the update, did the protest go ahead?
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:42 PM
23

Who? The DA seems happy with it, the victim is dead. No one else is interested in justice.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:35 PM
11

They don't. It's an easy complaint, in line with the "blame all men" strategy, to assume men either assault women or men are complicit in assaulting women. It's a scam in other words. Whenever someone says "men in general" they mean you, so go after them as defending your reputation. On another note, I've no idea how people have let this man v bear shit go for so long. How many bears live with women? How many men live with women? Pretty easy argument there. If a woman is stupid enough to say she…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 10:17 AM
54

Barrister James Stoller said the botched operations weigh heavily on Dr Goldman and that he is so aware of the errors 'he's just not likely to repeat it'. He already did ffs! What, we're on a scale here, one poor boy who's got no dick is one thing, but now you've done it twice well now you're really going to pay attention? Fuck off you quack. Idgaf about your business, it can and should go bust if you're that incompetent.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 02:43 AM
81

Tim's not improved in the time I've stopped watching him. "I feel sorry for this woman, blah blah" spends 5 minutes on minutiae, plays the video and cuts the part where we'd see what the problem was! Genius.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 07:50 PM
17

telling the court only ‘a monster would do something like this’. She's right about that. Taking out any of the problems of modern day on your kids is monstrous behaviour. We keep seeing this over and over though.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 07:39 PM
3

You won't hear it, because as far as they are concerned there are no innocent men. If a man is accused then a man is guilty.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 07:31 PM
1

Maybe you're seeing people hating women when it's not the case? I detest feminism as a whole, and its perpetrators also. I dislike SOME women for their incredibly appalling views, but the rest I can get along with no problem. They might claim it's misogyny, because that's an easy accusation to make, but it really isn't.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 07:09 PM
11

Can't find any note of any strikes in Poland currently. This is starting to look like click-bait for some reason.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 02:12 AM
3

No, not doing that at all. Feminists can be male and female, they are not women. You said we have to restore the balance for both sexes. I said I don't feel like fixing women's problems. No conflation there.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 12:35 AM
7

Not hatred exactly, but certainly strong disagreement. For the last couple of decades we have been told "feminism is for both men and women" and then been told "feminism is for women's problems, you need to fix your own issues", and when men did try to do that we ended up with feminist protests outside the gates pulling fire alarms. Having gone through that, I don't feel at all inclined to be lectured into trying to fix women's problems as well now. And just because you got downvoted for a fairl…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:42 PM
5

Torn between two positions on this one. Firstly obviously, feminism lies to everyone, so yeah, I feel sorry for women caught in the web of BS they spin. Secondly, women like that last example, who were married, got divorced because they thought they should? She's more responsible for her own condition than feminism is. But the continuing failure of women to accept responsibility for their own situation when they are the authour of it all is mind-boggling, their ability to deflect accountability …
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:32 PM
4

It'd be good if someone pointed that lot out to those wishing the death of men before they get the choice. And no, I didn't see the movie.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 03:17 AM
4

It's not hate, it's a potential. As is artificial wombs making women unneccesary. From the male perspective, women should be concerned about who is doing this research, is it a man? Who's going to make the gear to produce the embryos, is that a man? Who's going to supply the materials to make the equipment out of, is that a man? Because if any of those are Yes, it's a man, then somehow some woman is going to have to learn to dig minerals out of the ground, or to work in a steel foundry, or a man…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:48 AM
5

Wikipedia is one of the core of feminist-supporting sources on the net. There's no "of all places", it's where you should expect heavy amount of bias.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 07:39 PM
1

It's perjury, which carries some fantastically nasty sentences, and quite rightly. But it doesn't get enforced, there's always a whole host of "mitigating" circumstances, which boils down to "is she young and hot?".
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:57 PM
8

In the UK, last I heard, women who make false accusations get life in prison. That's never happened.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:56 PM
3

Agreed, though we have seen a nice collection of charges be reduced to 50 hours community service before. He spent a month in jail for her actions. Let's see what the law does about being played for a fool and falsely imrpisoning someone.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:53 PM
1

No, I prefer someone I can have a conversation with, rather than someone who will shout slogans at me.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 07:19 PM
5

As I'm sure you're aware, there's thousands of examples, from the lunatic feminists screaming kill all men and male tears, to the NOW fighting against women being recognised as rapists, to the Italian feminists trying to suppress the public awareness of women as being responsible for domestic violence. Of course, I expect you'll do your best to try to disassociate the movement from the people following it. The same way I'm sure you'd agree that Christianity and Christians should not be put in th…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:48 PM
5

You can't see the connection between the hate for men these women were indoctrinated with, and the current hate campaign being waged on men? You disagree that feminism is responsible for both? Sure I agree that you are responsible for your own choices, but at the same time we can't overlook the huge effort to get people to choose the way the feminists wanted them to. It's like claiming that someone taking drugs was all on themselves, and not at all anything to do with the dealer.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 06:59 PM
6

I was about to complete my 6-month probationary period While the excuses given by the company for this are pretty garbage, I suspect this is the real reason. Some companies have a habit of firing before the probation period is over as completing that comes with worker rights, and sometimes a pay increase.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 04:17 PM
16

Well, that's just twisted. Hopefully the expectant mothers hear that rationale and remember the pain that she put them through.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 02:23 AM
18

God above, what reason do they give for denying it? And how fast can you get a court order taking parental responsibility away from her?
/r/MensRights18/05/24 02:16 AM
12

Maternity has it's own department, it's own medical specialisation, it's own type of nurse ffs. It absolutely is not considered secondary to any other specialisation. And there are many types of pain relief, I've never heard of a woman in labour being denied pain relief, heard plenty of times when they've refused it though. This woman is a moron, through and through. The front door of any major hospital is the A&E unit, where emergencies of all kinds come in. With the best will in the world, it'…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 02:14 AM
86

They did. It's horrendous.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 07:30 PM
3

Yes they should have. It was shut down from the Ireland side, because what she did was offensive to them. Everyone's talking as if the only opinion that matters is the American one.. "it's legal to be topless".. not in Ireland it isn't, that's why the portal got shut down.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 07:10 PM
6

Yeah, believe so, which is pretty appalling. Though NY did have a "death to America" rally last week so maybe the teams have swapped sides there. Lassie with the boobs above should be careful, sharia might get her..
/r/MensRights16/05/24 07:08 PM
16

Because of the weird morality of the publishing website, the "Oh isn't this horrendous, oh lord, save us.. now here's 10 more photos from her OF account". The DM gets a lot of use on here as the only site that will post a story we're interested in, which is fair enough. But their Faux Christian morality is a touch nauseating at times. They've probably made her a millionaire now.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 07:04 PM
2

I'm English, you should assume sarcasm at all times unless marked otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 01:40 PM
10

Left winger here, we're at the point where the majority of the left don't give a damn about male problems, and isn't interested in equality so long as it doesn't affect women. These are the true left nowadays, the left is so keen to point out language evolves, well so does political positioning. These fuckers are dragging the left wing further and further into the distance and trying to act like nothing has changed.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 01:36 PM
15

And the rule that was broken?: Forbidden topics Applies to Posts only Created Thu, May 19, 2022, 10:11:35 PM British Summer Time Full description See full rule descriptions here No topics requiring any sort of professional expertise: Medical advice Therapizing or counseling Legal advice Insurance questions Automotive / mechanic advice Non-professional forbidden topics: Tech support Homework or any schoolwork Criticism of appearance or talents Revenge Posts about Reddit itself I suppose it could …
/r/MensRights15/05/24 01:29 PM
3

But women can't rape.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 04:30 AM
4

Well, theoretically the appeal court can set a different [increased] sentence if they feel it's merited. I know, fat chance, but we can dream.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 04:29 AM
24

No no no, we can't call it rape, that's something only really evil men can do.. Precious wonderful women could never do anything as traumatic as that. Let's call it... naughty assault? No? I know, Indecent assault. At least that sounds better, it's got decent in it. NB to the ladies in here, sorry, I'm just having a crap month, nothing personal intended.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 04:28 AM
8

she cannot be held legally responsible due to her gender. There's that oppression we keep hearing about, that damn patriarchy! I swear so many women think their privilege is only equality.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 04:25 AM
1

Diseased sand? The labia are a seal, remove them and you have nothing blocking the way. It'd do the exact opposite, make irritation and infection much more likely.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:48 PM
1

Never said it was, just that they weren't doing it for cosmetic cream benefits.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 04:56 PM
2

As things are she's a danger to your kids. What happens when one of them tries to wake her up because someone's had an accident while she's in a drunken stupor? Or what happens to the kids when she can't be woken up? The idea of making a family work is commendable, but is it realistic when you're not there, and the "responsible adult" really isn't? Imo, up to you ofc but imo the next time she gets hammered and drives home, call the cops to her location.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 10:24 PM
19

Jewish people were circumcising their kids long before stem-cells were theorised about, and potentially with a solid reason [that getting sand under your foreskin from living in a desert environment would lead to many infections] Hospitals and doctors supporting this just for the payout is entirely disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 10:16 PM
-4

A flinch response is normal in everyone.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:58 PM
2

This might annoy some, but just consider it for a minute. Until recently, religion has had a very strong influence on society. That influence is dropping off in a big way, it's almost gone over here. One of the big rules is that suicide was a mortal sin, go to hell forever. Now that the influence is gone, people, especially men, are realising they don't have to keep on living a desperate or painful existence. I think the shitty situation for men has always been there, just now there are less rea…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:46 PM
6

I know, it's nauseating. "Justice is blind".. like hell it is.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:42 PM
17

The idea that a divorce court would assign her alimony after she's been found guilty of "attempting to murder him" is insane.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 05:37 PM
21

I wonder if her next victim will be happy with her husbands choice?
/r/MensRights13/05/24 05:35 PM
3

Combine that with the religious conflict coming up and we're all going to be very careful about showing others bits of ourselves.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:33 PM
8

Imo I don't give a fuck. Nudity in movies was only ever to sell tickets to see the "really hot actress with no clothes on" which nowadays is much superseded by straight porn sites, only fans or the actresses own instagram pages. Actors also need to be getting these "no nudity contracts", Henry Cavill and others standing up to directors insisting on it can only be good for audiences in future.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:30 PM
18

you probably did something creepy. Simply existing does not automatically mean a woman wants to be stared at in a creepy way. Using a word to define itself there. The current bid is "creepy is being a man she's not attracted to". Do you want to try to better that?
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:52 AM
5

Yup, so we have 3 apparently conclusive points, the first says nothing, the second is as I said, contradicted by current evidence, and the 3rd is a woke talking point. And muppet thinks he's proved something there?
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:20 AM
8

You just threw a link out there and didn't explain anything about the article. I was going to ask you to elaborate, but I'll settle for not hearing you say anything else.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 10:56 PM
7

3 lines of evidence, according to them: 1/ research "failed to demonstrate an advantage to single-sex schooling" 2/ boys and girls apparently learn exactly the same way. 3/ single-sex schooling facilitates social stereotypes and prejudice in children. Doesn't actually show anything, and is contradicted by current research.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 10:34 PM
12

Not sure about that tbh, it depends on your perspective. Research definitely HAS shown that female teachers mark boys down because they are boys, and that male teachers form better relationships leading to better results for boys. Seems like boys do better with male teachers.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 09:33 PM
4

Or somewhere to sit for a while when you had Taco Bell last night.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 09:20 PM
5

Who got all the money once it was earned? In the late 40s over here it was standard practise to earn your paypacket, go home, give it to the wife and she'd give you your beer money out of it. As related by my grandma and others who lived and worked in that time. If you think women were historically powerless you believe a delusion.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:34 PM
2

There's no difference. If you allow one you allow the other.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:23 PM
52

Nps, the law won't do that, but the 200 hired protestors you'll have outside your door will mean your business won't get off the ground.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:17 PM
63

"Research shows that a girl learns best in an all-girl, girl-friendly and girl-led envrironment." Research shows that a boy learns best in an all-boy , boy-friendly and boy-led envrironment. So where are they?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:15 PM
1

You probably are. Which is part of the problem, if the council won't supply enough cops to deal with every-day issues, then cops are going to be under-manned trying to deal with those problems. Which means they are particularly vulnerable, with no one watching their backs. I'd not be rushing into ambushes all day either, I'll wait till someone else is available to help. Like I said, I'm not a fan of it, but it's a job, not a well paid one and not one with great social standing. So I'm not going …
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:55 AM
1

Strikes and work to rule are never intended to solve problems, but to demonstrate current problems more clearly. Seems like it's working as well, seeing your comment above.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:05 PM
23

"Oh, she was just taking well-deserved revenge on the supporters of the patriarchy! That 5 year old boy was a well known figure in MRA circles". The whole concept of the patriarchy is not intented to mean anything, it's designed to absolve responsibility from feminists and to justify anything they want it to. The sooner we all start pointing that out the sooner we can all start to look at the real problems, not the BS excuses.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:57 PM
1

Portland was the soul of "defund the police", weren't they? And NYC not much better. I'm not saying I approve of a go-slow, but I can fully understand it.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:46 PM
1

Not a chance, not until they start thinking that their seats will be at risk if they don't support it. You know, same as feminism. But we do need to start working on some pressure groups.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:44 PM
7

I saw the post about the stalker "needing more support" before I saw this post.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:42 PM
3

But there's not a massive pool of male sexual abuse victims who didn't report it at all, honest.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:41 PM
12

European women generally prefer intact men, though they have a bit more exposure to seeing circumcised men through porn. American men support circumcision because they've gone through it, and don't want to admit 1/ that they are missing some sensation in sex, 2/ that they have actually been mutilated. I feel very sad for them, but that's the way it is.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 04:07 AM
9

Quickly, he was a religious nutcase, started cereal to try to bland down men so they wouldn't masturbate, and thought that Jewish circumcision was a great idea to stop men jacking off as well. So he pushed both and here we are.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 04:00 AM
6

As long as feminists refuse to take any stand on MGM, then I have no need to believe "feminism is for men". It's a simple litmus test. And as far as I know I've not seen one feminist crticise circumcision, it's always "stop trying to derail the discussion about FGM", when the discussion was always about boys. That and the "FGM is MUCH more harmful, circumcision is just a bit of skin", when I've seen videos of penis degloving from African circumcisions, and the most common form of FGM is a pin pr…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 03:57 AM
8

Because they thought getting into the job market was an easy life. They didn't consider that the hubby was doing the hard work, while they were having an easy time being a SAHM.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 05:24 PM
2

Nah, that's just saying "Hi". I've had posts at -50 and worse.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:01 PM
1

That wasn't within the scope of the government of the time, immigration and "free movement of population" was an EU policy that overrode national law. It was necessary to go through Brexit to regain national control of our borders.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:01 PM
1

Yeah, that's from legacy law and social mores from over the last few centuries [chivalry etc]. I did say "over the last few decades", which is the timeframe for feminists in politics making laws aimed at harming men.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 03:57 PM
7

There's a left wing men's rights sub, at /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates. The trick in both is to focus on keeping the talk on the rights, rather than the politics. You don't have to be right wing to survive being in this sub, but you do have to accept that the left is responsible for a large portion of the harm done to men over the last few decades.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:37 AM
0

It should be noted that the right is fond of immigration to keep wages down, as much as the left like to do it for so-called humanitarian reasons. And this pledge card was the heart of the biggest Labour win over the Conservatives in voting history. As I recall they either kept the promises or made significant inroads into keeping them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Labour,_New_Life_for_Britain#Pledge_card
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:30 AM
6

What an evil bitch. It's sad I don't believe in hell, because that's where she belongs.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 11:28 PM
3

Yeah, it can be frustrating. Imo there's 2 options, 1, as mentioned here, become your own boss. Typically this leads to much longer working hours and high levels of stress, but it suits some people. 2, Move to a different legal situation. That'll either be a different state, or possibly a different country. If you have skills that travel well then that can be quite satisfying, again according to some people. As far as I can tell, nothing is going to get better for quite a while, and we're due a …
/r/MensRights07/05/24 11:13 PM
3

That's the definition of choice though, not duress. Yeah, I agree it's used in court like that, just saying they are talking BS.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:25 PM
1

She claimed he was aggressive, intimidating and had a temper, she told the outlet. So when he encouraged her to hit a bong on the day of the stabbing, she gave into the pressure -- then went into a deadly psychosis. Yeah right. Then decided she was going to end him, then look around for any excuse to get away with it. Hopefully if she appeals, the appeal court take a look at her sentence and give her what she truly deserves.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:10 PM
13

This is basically it. If society doesn't provide men with a goal that they want to achieve, then men won't be motivated to contribute in any way. The last decade has removed almost all of the traditional goals, but hasn't replaced them with any modern goals. Better get it fixed, or society will collapse, not because of external manipulation or war, or because of internal strife or revolution, but simply from apathy.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:51 PM
61

Feminism. Simple. Anyone opposing feminism must be evil. The way to counter it is to ask some questions: "Salamadierha is an evil evil MRA" "You think men dying much younger than women is fair?" "you think people should receive death threats just because they want to set up a homeless shelter for me?" Make it nice and specific so that only a real sicko could argue against it. Most likely you won't get an answer from them for this, but others will read it and you get some commentary from them.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 05:19 PM
3

Maybe not, but you can 'not lose' instead. When the conversation turns personal and they start making attacks on you rather than on what you say, that's when you know you've done enough. When that happens you can point it out, and walk away head held high.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:36 PM
2

Of course I had a lot to say but since there's no winning, I didn't. You can win, you just need to know the arguments and to have the bloody mindedness to see it through. You did ask what people thought of that statement :)
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:23 PM
2

Shorter sentences.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:21 PM
2

That story, don't think that article but that story was on here recently.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:51 PM
10

Oh god. Sometimes it can be so depressing to be correct.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:33 PM
265

I'm sure there'll be some lunatic who would say "but at least she survived, she wouldn't if it were a man" somewhere.. Just hope she makes a good recovery.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 11:57 AM
12

While this is a helpful sub in the most part, I'd go talk to a real live lawyer that specialises in divorce, in your case especially one that has experience in military families. You may be able to get suggestions from your colleagues. A lawyer will be able to give you the info you need, rather than some people on the net you've never met, it's almost certainly worth the extra cash.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:20 PM
3

There are plenty of feminists post on this sub, you don't need to go elsewhere. Though if that fits you better, you can collect a bunch of comments, screen shot and blur names etc. Problem is, the number of women who think women should face any consequences for their own actions and are willing to say so are few and far between. Not non-existent, but rare. Rare like beef that still has a pulse. Yes, I know, I changed from feminist to women there, you might find some male feminists who think wome…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 06:46 PM
4

Simple. Show us some. Some feminists who think women should get hard time for this.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 03:22 PM
1

There isn't. It's just getting reported a lot more now.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 03:21 PM
2

Not sure projection is the right word for this, seems to be the exact opposite, but I get what you mean. Certainly the herd mentality comes into play, criticism of one becomes criticism of all.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 03:17 PM
5

Report said post for discrimination and post the reply in here :p
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:12 PM
59

Heh, in a post like that just say "yes, you're the asshole" and watch the fur fly. Except for a few commenters, people especially women take a comment against their own sex as a personal comment against them. Which is why AITA subs are circle jerks, not worth the effort to post in.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 12:29 PM
9

It keeps elderly women thinking they look young. Nothing is as valuable as that. /puke
/r/MensRights03/05/24 01:57 AM
6

It's the Grauniad, they seem unable to consider anyone else's point of view. I'm sure they used to have comments until they realised they could just turn them off and be the sole voice of authority handing down the gospel.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:53 PM
1

It doesn't matter, if they aren't as competent then they need to work to become as competent at the job before applying for it, when we've seen the effects of incompetence and the cost in human lives. There's no justification for talking a less competent person, and anyone who does that causes harm should end up on the harsh side of a lawsuit and criminal charges.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:07 AM
1

The line of fair and expected treatment keeps sliding further and further away. We keep pointing out these injustices, and the bias in the courts of law, and they keep on ignoring them. We're getting to the point where expecting the law to remedy the situation is an obvious bad-faith position. This will lead to people "taking the law into their own hands", vigilantism, because the courts can't be trusted. Then they'll come down hard on anyone doing this, as if they weren't the ones to bring the …
/r/MensRights01/05/24 07:08 PM
49

‘no risk to the public’. Except when someone guesses her age wrong, and she glasses them.. These people are called judges, but their judgement seems to be impaired.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 03:26 PM
3

More so than AHS spamming cp at subs? Things on twitter changed a lot when Elon took over.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 01:39 AM
4

Twitter is now generally much more open about speech than reddit is. I've been able to have discussions on there that would get me excommunicated on here.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 01:09 AM
1

You don’t get equal treatment by complaining about a woman who did get sexually discriminated against This is the problem when you don't read a comment or don't understand what was said. Show me where I said she wasn't discriminated against? I didn't, I complained about the language the tribunal judge, unsurprisingly a woman who said: Employment Judge Rachel Broughton said: [We] find that the 'pretty face' comment would not have been said to a man, or an equivalent comment made about a male coll…
/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:16 PM
1

Some that I know did, and got told to "man up" and to enjoy it. I wonder how women would react if they got told to enjoy harrassment? At least women get their complaints taken seriously. And that's the whole point of this sub, to try to get equal treatment for men.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:08 PM
39

I'm aggravated by the idea that no man has ever been told "come to this meeting/party/whatever, the MD likes good looking men" , which is obviously bollocks and absolutely HAS been applied to men in exactly the same way.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 02:04 PM
2

2 years ago
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:10 PM
4

It took hold years ago.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 03:51 PM
5

But we are also God-believing people so, in the end, we will be justified and everything will come out about it.” This REALLY doesn't help your case. Being so passive and accepting reduces the chances of anyone wanting to deal with a problem to just about zero. If there's anything the last 5 years have taught us is that the only way to get anything done is to get in someone's face about it.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 04:59 PM
3

Seems the US justice system has a hair trigger when they gets someone accused in their sights. This DA Henry Garza told USA Today: "We are always willing to listen and examine new information, and thats exactly what we did in this case." is a scum-sucker, if he hadn't pushed for 100 years inside this would never have gone that far. They always try to frame themselves as being full of integrity, they are slimy af.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 04:56 PM
0

Ho hum. It has been for at least 50 years now, seems your either not paying attention, are very new, or you're trolling. Anyway, here you go, some demonstrations. Feminism through the years. The current situation
/r/MensRights26/04/24 05:26 PM
1

Because feminism nowadays is directly opposed to men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:46 PM
2

But I don't want to shit where I eat So don't shit on them, treat them fairly and not just a pump n dump. Word gets around of both types, it can work out quite well.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:44 PM
1

Feminism was created by women in that situation, older and no marital ties worth consideration. The thought that it was a way for them to rationalise their condition, to make it all have had a point rather than it be an obvious outcome of their behaviour seems not to have crossed anyone's minds.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:35 PM
1

Life expectancy will be based on the average age of death for that year. I think there were reasons the age of death came down quite a bit over the 3 years there.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:28 PM
9

Most likely, there's not a lot to attract them. But this concerned me: As maternal mortality rates continue to rise in the US How the hell are maternal mortality rates rising? Unless an awful lot of illegal immigrant women are getting pregnant and not seeking medical support?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:14 AM
2

"My provider". Does he know she refers to him as that? If so wtf hasn't he ditched her so fast?
/r/MensRights25/04/24 02:58 PM
16

Arrested, awaiting charges and trial. This isn't any form of "getting away with it", YET. It might become one, but not yet.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 07:04 PM
1

Find a source in a different national paper then.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:24 PM
3

Complain about the Mail all you want to, it's a rag most of the time but remember, none of the left-wing news sources are even covering the issue. That puts the Mail head and shoulders above them.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:23 PM
7

For an online site, you're unlikely to find a better one. Unless you're referring to the female bias built into the site as a whole and subs mods?
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:17 PM
1

If it's happening in the US, it's happening in the UK. Maybe we shouldn't be too quick to talk about closing women's prisons just yet.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:15 PM
3

It's not a free pass, it's a framework to avoid any form of responsibility or accountability. It's designed to do that, the whole patriarchy/misogyny/male toxicity concept is intended to place any blame for a problem onto men and remove it from women. It's entirely deliberate, and working exactly as intended.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 01:32 PM
80

Responding to a blatant lie as well: " who posed no risk to the public." The guy was part of the public doing something harmless, possibly even flirting. She glassed him: I'd say she poses a lot of risk, even threat to the public.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:21 PM
66

Wasn't even wrong, less than 10% out, like calling an 18 year old 20.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:17 PM
6

That's what I mean, you're missing some nuance there. "She wouldn't let me use a rubber" Why would a red blooded American boy want to use a rubber? Why wouldn't he be happy that was the case? Think about why that might be. Something didn't look quite right down there. You want to be kissed with that mouth that just blew someone else? Really? Depending on the age group that's being considered, "she wanted anal" is not something a teenager would want to hear about herself. That last bit is the imp…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 09:04 PM
10

Only because you're giving that too much power because you're male, and not considering what bothers a woman, because you aren't a woman. Anything that relates to hygiene, poor standards, promiscuity, even contraception [she had crusts in her cooch!/I didn't want to do anal/she said she'd just blown Kalvin/she wouldn't let me use a rubber]. There's tons of options, and I'm not wanting to start a "list of things to call women", I'm just saying that if you're attacked by social comments, you can r…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 08:44 PM
10

There's plenty of other possibilities, women are not immune to social criticism. Imo should only be used in extreme cases like this one.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 07:56 PM
18

Quick answer: "hey, she smells kinda bad down there, I didn't want to put my dick in that". Longer answer: talk to your friends, ask them why you should be expected to have sex when you didn't to, when you're drunk and feeling like crap. If you're still in the same circle of friends with her, an occasional sniff as you walk past her will drive her insane. Not the most sociable of responses, but imo if people are using social commentary to bully someone, they deserve to get the same treatment rig…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 07:32 PM
2

As I said earlier, it was deleted by Twitter admins. I think I only got to see it because I posted in the thread before this.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 10:20 PM
3

Part of that is because what's happening elsewhere is very much censored on here and other sites. When you see a video of 3 men beating a woman with sticks because of a religious infraction you start to ask "why is this not front page news?" You can tell people it happens, but seeing it happen is completely different.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 12:15 PM
5

Sorry, but they are members of the "Progressive" element of the far left. They are also the reason I don't much support the left anymore.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 12:13 PM
3

Giving me a real shock, this post actually got deleted by the Twitter admins. I was amazed but it definitely happened. Maybe we're starting to create a change, even if it's small right now.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 12:01 PM
70

Surprisingly, the post got deleted by Twitter, but the message is clear.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 03:11 PM
17

That would indeed be their problem, and their problem alone.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 10:59 PM
15

That's what the EA claim. Whether it's "facts" remains to be seen.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 05:14 PM
7

It's a myth created to give feminists something to latch on to, it doesn't make any sense but after you've heard "down with the patriarchy" screamed for 4 hours you stop thinking about it. Cult behaviour, and your chances of convincing any of them of the truth is about as likely. Personally I treat mentions of "the patriarchy" in any serious manner as a huge red flag, just get out of that conversation as quickly as possible. What does bother me is when women say because of other men eg. "men die…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 11:08 AM
7

Remember that wikipedia is not authoritative about anything, and has a bunch of activists for editors. And whenever anyone claims wikipedia is a great source, or worth supporting, remember this and tell them to stfu.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 08:50 PM
5

Keep a spare long haired wig in the car. You know what's coming next..
/r/MensRights16/04/24 12:11 AM
1

How would the size of a parking space make it easier to get into a car? Sounds like someone is making shit up to cover the real reason.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 12:09 AM
4

Yes, but are all those positions open to men as well? If staff roles are filled with women, it's unlikely.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:53 PM
10

It doesn't actually matter, seeing as they will be reserving non-combat roles for these women. Which begs the question, why bother getting women into the army if they aren't there to fight?
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:34 PM
4

Verbal warning, written warning, final written warning, dismissal. Iirc in this type of disciplinary procedure they are at liberty to jump to whatever level of response seems appropriate to them, otherwise they'd be unable to sack someone for theft, for example. In other words, there's no complaint available for you there. I'd be interested in your actual complaint, that the numbers show a large bias the other way and that this contravenes diversity requirements. You probably wouldn't get far wi…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 03:21 PM
4

If she’s an upset, needy person and you [expletive] her and then the rumor starts going around school, she might need to, for the defense of her reputation, say, “He raped me.” So, calling a man a rapist is much less harmful than calling a woman a slapper? I think we should be concerned about this writers incredible lack of balance and question whether all of feminism seems to think this is reasonable as well.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 03:05 PM
11

In other words, boys who are abused by "NICE" teachers develop psych problems because of that, so they aren't the victimless crimes that is generally claimed. We could use this online in English to shut those arguments down.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 12:09 PM
1

I wasn't trying to say the FDA is interested in the money to be made, just that there would be test subjects who could end up badly harmed by the test, and as such would need compensating. If the finances aren't there for that, then I'd understand them not allowing it to go ahead.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 12:42 AM
3

Too generic a request, and it's not as though any universities or researchers are likely to look into something proving that their source of funding is talking crap.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:53 PM
14

She had once worked on prison reform and knew that jail is a place where sexual violence against men is routine but not counted in the general national statistics Why the hell not? If these places are being paid to to lock men up then they need to be held accountable for the safety of the men in there. Which means that what happens inside needs to be public knowledge.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:48 PM
10

because she looked like she had been assaulted When you've seen a video of a woman hitting herself with a hammer to provide "evidence" of assault, you really learn to take an objective view of things.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:14 PM
7

I don't think anyone here would disagree. The problem is you can't claim that "no one wants to prosecute these crimes" when you are unable to provide evidence that they happened. And someone saying "yeah, he did it" just turns into a "he said she said" situation, especially when she admits it started off consensual. However, womens issues with evidence is not the purview of the sub, we're much more concerned with how it plays out for men. As others say, making a claim when no crime was committed…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:13 PM
5

The police don't decide whether to prosecute or not, that's the CPS or DA's office. Wonder if the next call will be "Defund the DA"?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:06 PM
2

Code mode stops people seeing the full quote. What can be the response and is that true ? I just wanted awareness if that's a lie 'Fathers with children who do not live with them were asked in the 2002 census if they contribute financially to their children. 76% of Fathers with at least one child under 19 contribute child support for their children; 9% of Fathers contribute "once in a while" and 15% do not contribute at all.`
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:46 PM
2

At a complete guess, I'd say it's money, this is not something that insurance companies are likely to touch with a bargepole, leaving liability claims likely to rise towards the billion dollar mark. I'd assume your FDA wouldn't allow trials to progress without proof that they could cover at least most of that. Could be completely wrong about that ofc, anyone know better?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 12:24 PM
13

Ahh, you mean the real, actual numbers of PPD? Yeah, rare-ish, though tbh 1.5% of births isn't all that rare. The NHS site says 1 in 1000, or 0.1%. And considering symptoms include hallucinations and delusions cropping up within a couple of weeks of giving birth, it seems pretty specific, not something that pops up in passing a few months later.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:17 PM
2

Name n shame n get em prosecuted.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:12 PM
15

It's also a way to "stick it to whitey", when in reality improvements in mental health care would benefit everybody.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:12 PM
10

Not anymore..
/r/MensRights13/04/24 06:40 PM
5

I'm not kink-shaming, just questioning her accuracy. yes, you can wince now.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 04:56 PM
26

There's been various different methods suggested over the years, but none have ever made it past trial stage. I'll get excited about this if it does. Heh, “We have set up tiered pricing models that best accommodate different pay levels,” Fox said. Now doesn't that set the imagination on fire! High price level: dainty nurse Anya with tiny needle, low price level, shotputter nurse Olga with an axe.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 11:23 AM
2

I understand the principle you're putting forward here, but this IS a private company with the emphasis on keeping women happy, which is well known. The misandry is implied and explicit. I'm just surprised they bothered to investigate your claim, and even more so that they kicked her off.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 10:50 AM
1

Probably to try to convince gullible people that $40 is a bargain to go see them. Either that or to try to get plenty of jailbait to their gigs.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 01:39 PM
2

You don't. You date whoever you want to date over the age of 18.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 01:07 PM
9

CEOs often resign when everything is going great at a company. women any new CEO are commonly brought in as CEO when the biz has been performing poorly for at least 5 months prior.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 06:11 PM
5

Doesn't sound like she be worth paying for a funeral for anyway.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 03:21 PM
2

We've got the macro stats to back up the claim. The difference is night and day. It gives the lie to feminists claims that men have privilege, women actually have the privilege and either don't realise it or just want to keep playing the victim. I've heard privilege described as "private law", as in one law for the commoners and another for the nobles. It fits perfectly in this regard. Men face the law in all its majesty and power, women face the law in all its compassion and help.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:24 AM
1

Just an example of what would happen, it's very very rare over here.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:14 AM
1

Can't say I'm at all familiar with the case or situation, just something I saw on twitter yesterday.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:34 PM
1

just for example, I'll use nursing as I'm more familiar with that. Some nurse goes out and beats up one of her patients. The courts decide they need some alone time, and arranges it. A referral is made to the NMC, that oversee nurses, who will look at it and suspend and almost certainly strike off that nurse. The courts just need to pick up a phone and make 1 call. It's part of being a professional, you have to maintain a standard to continue to be part of that profession. It absolutely should n…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:32 PM
1

Didn't the new AG say she wouldn't prosecute illegal abortions?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:14 AM
30

after accepting legal culpability on one count of risk of injury to a minor Judge Maureen Keegan sentenced him to five years of probation. He is also subject to a suspended 10-year jail sentence if he violates the terms of his probation While she has to complete a 2 year sexual predator program for actually raping the boy and accusing him of trying to blackmail her? Thank you for pointing out the massive differences in the way men and women are treated by the courts.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:36 AM
2

Wtf does a courtroom have to deal in order to get her teaching license removed? Surely that should be the job of the governing body for teachers?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:32 AM
7

All non-medically necessary surgeries should be banned on minors. If they want to get something cosmetic done once they are an adult then that's absolutely fine.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 09:37 PM
7

It's entirely against the law in the UK.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 09:35 PM
2

Posted on youtube 6 years ago.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 09:33 PM
3

I 100% support the right of men to make similar groups to warn each other about problematic women. Absolutely, equal rights and all that.. just like on the site.. hold on, where's the sites about women that men post on again? I can't seem to find any.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:08 PM
18

When he dates them, pumps and dumps, and doesn't make them part of his millionaire lifestyle. they get mad at him ?
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:04 PM
2

You might want to look at that source again, the 63% greater sentence is only the tip of the iceberg, and doesn't appear in it. Bias creeps in at all levels, Whether an arrest is made, [100%, or double the amount of arrests for men] Whether a charge is made, Whether a conviction occurs, and as you say, how long a sentence is [30% according to your article] If we can fill in the numbers for all levels then we can tell how bad the bias actually is, but the equivalence is given in the first paragra…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 09:34 AM
8

Not quite. They are biased against men, and expressed by being biased against the breadwinner. If women become the breadwinners expect the rules to change, same as they did in universities for affirmative action.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 10:21 PM
2

Nowadays? Probably not.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 10:17 PM
4

There's the other mens rights sub, /r/leftwingmaleadvocates that provides a left wing pov on men's issues, as well as plenty of anti-right attacks/commentary. MRAs are only associated with the right because as you say feminism is associated with the left. There are plenty of MRAs who are left wing, myself included, some of whom are regular posters in here.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 04:21 PM
7

If you want to make a political comment about how the parties don't give a damn about men, how about making it all-encompassing and include how the left are the ones who brought about the current war against men? I think we're all pretty much aware of how the main political parties don't give a damn about men, trying to support one by slagging the other off is a pointless exercise.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 04:02 PM
4

This is what people were thinking when they invented German, look where that got us!
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:56 PM
16

More, presumed guilt by society in general when the news gets out, meaning a ton of damage done before the verdict is in.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:52 PM
11

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68727018 Woman behaves badly, man at fault.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:02 PM
22

It’s time to recognise that misandry is real, and is as sick as any other prejudice. It’s time to call out those who show contempt for men, just as we would call out anyone for showing contempt to someone because of any other characteristic protected by the Equality Act (2010). This highlights the real problem. It's not those tweeting kill all men who are the problem, it's the people making the laws who are misandrist. As long as they are in charge, we're not getting anywhere.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 11:04 AM
1

Take the top answer, but expand on point 5, that women get arrested less for the same crime, charged less for the same crime and punished less for the same crime, as per a recent thetinmanblogs post.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 10:36 AM
2

More like try/get knocked back, try/get knocked back, try/get knocked back, try/get knocked back, and eventually say screw it. Most of them would eventually find someone, the question is whether it would be worth the damage to their mental health to continue the search, and whether the woman at the end of it would be a suitable partner.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 10:26 AM
36

The choice isn't to have sex or not, it's whether to put the effort into chasing after sex or not. A lot of men are deciding the game isn't worth the candle.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 10:33 PM
4

If women don't want to be hit by massive college debt then they should reconsider going to college.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:10 AM
24

Nothing new from her, she's been at this for a decade or longer.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 04:09 PM
1

It saves people accusing you of paranoia in the first place. Unless men are being paid in shares then the company efficiency is irrelevant, they aren't going to pay more just because there's fewer of you. Used to work at a place where if someone called in sick, the rest of those on the shift would split the pay they would have earned. It was one of the most pleasant places to work, very little grumbling. Of course, eventually, that got stopped and morale went into the toilet.
/r/MensRights28/03/24 05:04 AM
5

Men will work for whoever pays them the most. Terms and conditions are irrelevant, in an economy where you can never afford what you need you need to bring home as much as you can. It's very curious that this version of equity has struck so hard in the west, while being ignored in China/Russia. Slightly paranoid observers might suspect there's something deliberate about that.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:05 PM
16

Dead and gone, there was no way that was going to survive. It leaves the post with this kind of response: Even outside of a personal level, women are kicking men's asses in education. Although men may will likely earn more for the same positions, I see the median woman out earning the median man in our lifetime. I think that's definitely worth investigating Women are more likely to have bachelor's and master's degrees than men and the trend is growing. On college compuses, women now outnumber me…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:09 PM
11

Have to say Twitter nowadays is so much better than Reddit. The format isn't as good, but being able to state your point without worrying about some mods feelings or whether the sub will ban you and delete your comment is worth the hassle.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:00 PM
88

Just seen this thread, it's interesting that there's a mile long trail of "sorry, your post got deleted because it doesn't saw what we want you to say".
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:53 AM
3

Again, fair enough, hope I've clarified things. Ed: and ffs people, stop dv him, he was reasonable and made his point. Save the dvs for the arseholes who brigade on here.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:03 PM
26

That's the attitude that lets women get away with everything. Daddy man, baby girl.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:11 PM
3

So when is the department going to sue her for the public disrepute she brought it into?
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:10 PM
5

Fair enough, no one said you have to be invested yourself. Imo it sets the tone for a mans life, like being branded after birth. And it's potentially life-changing, even fatal occasionally. So others are concerned about it. While it might be usually low-impact it affects a lot of boys, so it's worth the effort. You don't have to come on every post to comment, or even read if you don't want, but there's no doubt this is an appropriate place to talk about it, and obviously there's a lot of people …
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:09 PM
2

Hushh.. it's He for She, not She for He.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 12:58 PM
7

Give you a clue: sub is called mens rights. any form of non-medical cutting of girls genitals is illegal. this very common form of non-medical cutting of boys genitals seems to be perfectly fine, legally. Why the difference? obvious answer is discrimination, making it a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 12:58 PM
1

Asking a lot here, would there be any way to contact him for a recording of a future event, or to make a summary?
/r/MensRights22/03/24 12:54 PM
2

It wouldn't be on youtube would it? We need something solild to go against the propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:32 AM
1

Not to worry, I took it more as a generalisation.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:45 PM
6

I suspect he thought "while" was "white".
/r/MensRights21/03/24 06:15 PM
9

Not sure as to your point there? Imo it'll take pressure from all different voters, men and women, to get rid of conscription. I'm certainly not arguing for any division.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 05:55 PM
39

The more people being conscripted the more people will be against conscription. You won't get rid of it while only men are conscripted, it'll take all voting groups to at least be impacted by it.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:50 AM
5

Challenge everyone you vote for publicly on their positions, keep it simple as possible while making it obvious as possible that there's discrimination going on. If they aren't opposed to conscription it'll show in their answers and even if it won't affect their voting bloc it'll make the politician feel uncomfortable, softening their position in future.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:48 AM
14

Martinez added the accusations go back at least two years, before Charles had ever started teaching. So grooming definitely, looks like she got into the job to get better access to boys.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:39 AM
1

Oh, I've known that for several years now, but there's still a lot of people who seem to believe that it is, so only by showing examples like this can we get through their mental blocks to realise the truth.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:37 AM
114

Exactly the same argument applies to young girls and their predators.. "But I love him, we're going to be together forever" If you condemn that, you have to condemn female predators in the same way.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 03:43 AM
17

Let's be honest here, if a man stabbed a woman 100 times because of weed he smoked, there's no way he's not getting 20 years inside. The CPS or DA would find a way. The problem here is that the prosecutors didn't have the will to put a woman in jail. "An attractive white woman, she obviously doesn't belong in prison." The prosecutors are the problem. You need to find a way to replace them.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 05:14 PM
2

More like first resort, they only stopped because of WW1 breaking out, funny how they didn't want to go to the front and fight like the men were, but they were more than happy to throw accusations of cowardice in men's faces, some of whom had just come back from the front! These were not nice people, nor were they good people. Murderers and demagogues, forcing men to do something they wouldn't do themselves. And I care, seeing as we're going through a time of calling out supposed heroes for thei…
/r/MensRights16/03/24 05:49 PM
46

A lot of men are checking out not because they find their own sexuality repulsive but because they are faced with endless tirades from women and the media about how they 'should be this instead of that'. If you don't like me as I am, I'm not going to be your cash point.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:31 AM
9

Struggling to see how you equate "terrorists sending letter bombs" with "feminism is a good thing". Unless you think we should be sending letter bombs ourselves, seeing as we're lacking rights nowadays? [note to mods, no, I'm not endorsing anyone sending bombs to anyone here, just calling it out]
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:56 PM
6

That's the general "for public release" statement, sure. But where have they ever acted towards equality for both sexes, where have they ever acknowledged that the scale in some places might be tipped in favour of women? Just spouting the propoganda doesn't make it true. I guess you're not a feminist, because a real feminist would never slander someone's sexual situation like that. /s
/r/MensRights15/03/24 08:19 PM
5

It's extremists all the way down.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 08:16 PM
7

You do realise that the suffragettes were terrorists, involved in sending parcel bombs, right?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 08:14 PM
3

There is feminism with regards to women in oppressive countries, of which there are many. True, but the question there is, what does feminism support in that circumstance? Does it support the women who are being oppressed, or the religion that's the mainstay of the method of oppression?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 08:12 PM
2

Oh very probably not, but they had a chance to fix it back in early 2000s and they didn't. That's when it falls on them.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 07:46 PM
3

Strictly speaking it's since they passed the Sexual Offences Act into law. Apparently they were considering the point of view, but had a very large lobby convince them to not change it.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 10:57 PM
31

I think the UK law courts need to accept that they've been deliberately ignoring a significant category of harm to a lot of men for quite a few years now.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 09:07 PM
3

The Birkenhead drill has been on wikipedia for years, why would the Beeb make a big deal about a museum talking about it now?
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:30 PM
4

Patriarchy! Rules for me but not for thee. Yeah, feminists are really oppressed, obviously.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 05:04 PM
1

Possibly, but if it came to a referendum on the topic it'd be "conscription yes or no".
/r/MensRights14/03/24 03:32 PM
1

Tbh I wasn't talking about the response in Denmark, but from women further West who aren't living next to Russia.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 03:30 PM
16

Now is the time to push for ending conscription completely. There'll be massive support from women scared they're going to get drafted, we won't get a better shot at this.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 03:00 AM
4

It's stupid to DV this when it could well be correct. Men having a later retirement age probably contributes to shorter lifespan, and that's entirely manmade. There's plenty of other causes that we can fix, so aren't "natural" either.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 06:32 PM
2

Left wingers are pro-women, which would be fine if it didn't get interpreted as anti-men so often. Currently there are very few politicians who support mens rights, trying to tarnish one side or another makes you look suspiciously biased.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 06:30 PM
1

Make sure she gets the company in the divorce settlement, you get the house and kids.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 07:26 PM
2

No, I didn't even finish the course, the emphasis on the benefits of punchcards put me off. It was just something that stuck with me. "Women were programmers because they were the ones who knew how to type". And you have to wonder, with the way women and minorities have been written into historical events recently, how accurate are the books we see nowadays?
/r/MensRights11/03/24 01:08 AM
3

Sorry, I was just repeating something a comp-sci teacher taught me.. damn, near 40 years ago. If it's been revised, then sorry you're upset.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:35 AM
3

Sure, when someone gives you what they want entering and you enter exactly that.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:37 PM
4

Sure, the way all women were protesting to have the vote, right? And no, the "sexist system" was the best option they could come up with at the time. Just feminists, when they weren't too busy sending letter bombs, cherry picked shit, funny how no feminists ever said they wanted to work down a coal mine. The womens finances is more chicken/egg than anything else. Do you want to have your own bank account, or do you want to have someone else pay for everything you want? I'd imagine there were ple…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:35 PM
2

Why would a woman need her own bank account when any debts she created were automatically her husbands problem? There's a bunch of feminists round WW1 time got their husbands into debtors prison this way, by spending more than he actually had. I wonder if this is where feminists got the idea of being unaccountable from? And women were the earliest programmers because they were the ones who'd been taught how to type, not through some special understanding of code.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:11 PM
11

Should make a point of going over to the women in the park, and cheerfully tell them "this looking after the house and kids is easy isn't it?" and watch them erupt in flames.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:00 PM
1

Just over one in five (21 percent) of the Generation Z respondents aged between 18 and 26 surveyed as part of the poll said they thought it was "worse." So 79% think it's as good or better? Why does the article not show the actual results.. give you one guess..
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:55 PM
1

The problem is that the issues we see are not ones that they see in universities. That's where most studies are carried out from, so if they aren't researching our problems we don't get studies to back up our point of view. There's been a few come through that are invaluable, but we need a lot more to start shifting the weight of opnion.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:50 PM
8

They already started the PR "there has been an ongoing investigation into several issues and concerns". yeah right.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:48 PM
9

He got a suspended sentence. She was sentenced to 3 years. The ex [the victim of the false accusation] spent 4 months inside. He was a corrections officer, so those 4 months will not have been easy.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 07:57 PM
14

Political equivalent of /r/menslib coming in 3, 2, 1.. Sorry but I find it hard to believe that this info has been out there for the past few years, yet all of a sudden with a general election coming up they realise and are jumping on board the "we must help men" bandwagon. That's ignoring the built-in anti-male BS coming from Jess Phillips et al.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 06:25 PM
19

Last one I remember was a farmer who shot someone in self defence, but it was as they were leaving his property so he got done for that. This isn't really about what the law says, it's about how the law is applied. In this case I'm wondering if the police/CPS are trying it on a bit to get an easy win.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 05:37 PM
9

We're fully aware of how well self-defence goes down in centres of excellence such as New York, Washington, San Francisco etc.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 04:43 PM
5

Hmm, would it make a difference if you were facing 2-1 odds instead of 1 on 1? Being outnumbered would surely give you more grounds for your self defence, whether or not they press charges against her.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 04:41 PM
85

Solicitor, odds are he's UK based. I'd say when you go to court stress that both of them were attacking you with the apparent intent to kill. If the guy didn't give up until the last stab, that's your rationale for self-defence.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 04:39 PM
9

There's no way to avoid the pitfalls, the courts have final say and they are compromised. You marry a women overseas, bring her to your home country, she then becomes subject to those laws, as do you, and you end up with a 5 year marriage and a bombshell at the end of it.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 09:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter