| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | The actual post is disgusting, but the comments make me feel physically ill. If you look at the comments, I would like to remind you that men are often criticised for being sexist.Holy shit yeah, those comments are sexist as hell. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/20 06:45 AM |
| 26 | The actual post is disgusting, but the comments make me feel physically ill. If you look at the comments, I would like to remind you that men are often criticised for being sexist.Holy shit yeah, those comments are sexist as hell. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/20 06:45 AM |
| 1 | VIDEO: Frumps brutally rips Greta ThunbergYou seem surprised that an intergovernmental panel concerning one of the greatest dangers in the history of mankind is contained within the single most expansive international union in the history of mankind. And no, it does not bother me much that climate scientists are affiliated with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Where else would you expect scientists to converge to convince people like you that temperatures are rising? Would you be surprised to find that medical doctors work… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/19 11:48 PM |
| 1 | VIDEO: Frumps brutally rips Greta ThunbergAgain, now from this very article you have linked: "Preliminary evidence suggests these differences would likely favor the UE group. From the ∼60% of researchers where year of PhD was available, mean year of receiving a PhD for UE researchers was 1977, versus 1987 for CE researchers, implying that UE researchers should have on average more publications due to an age effect alone." Here, UE is short for Unconvinced by the Evidence, and CE is short for Convinced by the Evidence. This rules out you… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/19 11:08 PM |
| 2 | VIDEO: Frumps brutally rips Greta ThunbergFrom the very article you linked: "Nearly all publishing climate scientists (97–98%) support the consensus on anthropogenic climate change." and further through the article: "...the consensus has strengthened over time and is now virtually unanimous. The level of consensus correlates with expertise in climate science." Now what was that you were you saying about poorly written articles? Seems even your choice must be poorly written then? Or maybe... no... could it be? That you were wrong? Great,… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/19 10:43 PM |
| 2 | VIDEO: Frumps brutally rips Greta ThunbergYes, the mechanisms of climate change aren't uncontested. However, the overwhelming consensus is that it is man-made. As for the fact that the climate is changing at a significantly disproportionate rate to the natural cycles, all but the very fringe of scientists regard that as an undeniable fact. Nevertheless, going with the overwhelming scientific consensus is the best choice for laypeople. Also, please don't accuse me of being dishonest. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/19 10:27 PM |
| -1 | VIDEO: Frumps brutally rips Greta ThunbergIndeed, kinda seems like this is the type of MRA that feminists think of. (Climate change isn't even remotely contested in science btw) | /r/MensRights | 28/09/19 10:15 PM |
| 2 | OooofIsd if you deserve the upvote, I'm just so drunk. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/19 09:19 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter