TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SaltdPepper Archive

View 0 posts and 175 comments by SaltdPepper on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

His next line is “hmmm should I end a relationship just because he doesn’t support hating all white people?” If this is what he believes liberal women are refusing to compromise on politics wise I think that’s reason enough to disregard the rest of the post. Dude’s head is in orbit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 08:08 AM
3

I’ve read your other comments on this thread, and while you make well-reasoned points in those, I’m gonna have to argue against this one. Healthy women *try* to avoid abusers, but even they aren’t equipped properly to steer clear of them entirely. Abusive men, especially when we aren’t strictly speaking physically abusive, are everywhere, and can absolutely hide their violent or insensitive behaviors until whoever they’re with is in a vulnerable enough position for them to unleash said behaviors…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 07:48 AM
1

So does it not follow that both men’s and women’s standards are fairly unrealistic in this day and age? I’ve seen plenty of dudes call even the smallest imperfection in a woman “chopped” just as I’ve seen women do so too. We’re all chopped.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 03:59 PM
1

Standards are “warped” only if there’s a solid foundation to have been “warped” from. Since standards are, by and large, arbitrary, we should be attempting to reinforce healthy standards and reducing unreasonable standards. I’m not the guy to outline what kinds of things fall into either category, but it’s clear these guys are missing the forest for the trees. Women are victims of the same underlying societal issues men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 03:57 PM
2

That seems like quite the jump to conclusions. Just because they’re questioning an inability to understand romantic love without an accompanying sexual element says nothing about them not being able to view romance on its own. Most people who engage in romance also engage in sex as a form of romantic intimacy. Romance by itself is increasingly rare in this day and age.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:10 AM
1

They “came” to you? That seems like something you should report to HR
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:58 PM
–

Not the end of history, but certainly the end of this iteration of society. It is eating itself from the inside out. Either compounding social factors or external environmental factors (or a combination of both, à la man-made climate change) will result in its collapse and subsequent recovery. Hopefully next time we can get past these stupid problems we’ve imposed on ourselves arbitrarily to cement the power of those benefitted by hierarchy. Generally, society needs to put on its adult shoes and…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:21 PM
3

Well it was a waste of my time anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 04:47 AM
3

Lmao at the idea that 2 nebulous degrees and “living through the fall of the Berlin wall” gives you the expertise/knowledge to speak on socialism. Genuine delusion. Get lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 04:37 AM
3

Because you have no idea what socialism is and are basing your concept of it on the authoritarian Marxist-Leninist/Maoist interpretation of Marx. Read a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 03:38 AM
5

Are you still in middle school? This is a childish response.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:23 AM
2

Libertarian socialism advocates for freedom of workers via collective ownership of their workplaces as well as the gradual de-commodification of basic physiological needs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 12:30 AM
1

I have the same question as the last guy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 04:18 AM
2

If you can’t tone, tan. If you can’t tan, tat. And if you really don’t know what to do with yourself, do all three.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 03:59 AM
1

Not new here. I’m actually used to you and other women here getting rather annoyed at dudes whining about shit and being judgy over the preferences of other people, which I totally understand. Not sure then why you’d see that and want to emulate it, and then die on that hill. Really makes you no better than the dudes who complain about how women only go for “chad” because they think they’re too lazy to expand their options or something. Not wanting to date multiple people at a time is not a refl…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:10 AM
2

I don’t see your argument here. “People are lazy for not dating multiple people at a time because I think they are”? Like, everyone’s judgmental, but not everyone goes onto a debate subreddit and defends their judgments based on nothing but their own feelings. I feel like you gotta come up with more than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:38 PM
2

Not wanting to date multiple people at once sounds like laziness? That seems awfully judgemental Some people just don’t have the social energy to be putting on their best selves for multiple people at a time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:50 PM
4

Recently an overwhelming majority of posts on this subreddit contain a ridiculous amount of spelling mistakes and can barely keep their point straight in the bodies of their own posts. There also seems to be a major incel movement developing in India and other Southeast Asian countries. I wonder if the two are correlated at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:41 AM
5

Idk I feel like that’s a normal preference for people to have. Most people I know don’t want to feel like they’re constantly competing with others, especially for romance. That’s Disney Channel romcom nonsense. Maybe talking to multiple people at once? But once you start going on dates I feel like it’s healthier for everyone if you focus on one person at a time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:36 AM
2

You didn’t ask any😭
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:32 AM
-4

Maybe you just need to trip balls so bad you deprioritize all this bullshit and do something that’s actually spiritually satisfying
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 06:31 AM
1

God, how hard is it for you to state that outright? Instead it had to be several comments deep of you claiming that romantic incompatibility somehow had anything to do socioeconomic class. Also what’s up with all the women on this subreddit telling me they don’t care? If you don’t care about how your opinions come across, maybe you shouldn’t be a top 1% commenter on a debate subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 07:20 PM
1

Eh, I’ve known a handful of people who fit that bill and I can’t say he’s far off. Although I agree some evidence of it would be nice lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 01:29 AM
2

I’d suggest looking up the concept of the Overton Window. The US’ window has shifted far to the right, which is why everyone is referring to the Dems as center right. And this is speaking to the DNC and mainstream Democratic politics, not to individual Dems like AOC or others who align themselves with the Dems for an ounce of political power.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 01:25 AM
1

“As long as the characteristics affected by his class don’t match his class and instead my own preferences, we can date” Classism “As long as his character doesn’t match his upbringing in an African-American household and instead my own preferences, we can date” Racism Spot the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 12:58 AM
2

Hasan is a champagne socialist nepo-baby who shocks his dog like a stream prop. I’m as leftist as they come, but the dude comes off as a total sleaze and yet he’s maintained millions of followers because he’s handsome. This is the kind of thing OP is talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 12:44 AM
1

Ew. Stonetoss unironically, seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 07:16 PM
–

Well maybe you shouldn’t have posted on the open debate forum then
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 07:06 PM
–

Are you talking to yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 07:03 PM
–

God, nothing like the heinous crime of recording your voice instead of using text. Believe it or not, straight to jail! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 07:01 PM
–

Are you a bot? You’re responding to a different person lmaoooo
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 06:59 PM
–

Try reading their comment again instead of jumping to ridiculous conclusions
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 06:58 PM
–

Thank you for this brilliant misinterpretation of their point. Truly a profound addition to the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 06:56 PM
–

I wouldn’t ascribe that behavior to all feminists. TERFs and other “Radfem” types like JKR are the ones that started the Imane Khelif hate campaign.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:44 AM
–

Gender non-conforming
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:43 AM
3

This. Huge pushes by conservative media to repopularize “traditional” relationships as well as a general lowering of trust among people has caused the pendulum to unnaturally swing back towards sex negativity. It’s funny though, because GenZ is still fairly social and, on the surface, seems just as sex positive as millennials, but overall social battery/attention span is much lower and most sex positivity is black and white (groups having a lot of sex and groups having literally none).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:20 AM
3

I mean, think of it simply in terms of outcomes. If you have two men, one generally “good” and one generally “bad”, you will have one good outcome and one bad outcome. Sitting there and hoping the bad one comes around because he sees the good one “doing good things out of the bottom of his heart” is counterproductive. You will never get a bad person to change by simply surrounding them with good, you need to make doing good result in some sort of benefit which outweighs whatever bad thing they m…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:07 AM
1

Hey so. You completely misrepresented their argument about 3 times. Way to derail the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:23 AM
1

What??
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:19 AM
1

I’m genuinely surprised that you’re this obtuse and think anyone should take you seriously in a debate subreddit. Just “because you can” is not why you replied. You replied because you wanted to, and you know exactly why that is. Go do something better with your time and maybe the world will actually improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:41 AM
1

I think you might be confused. You have to make the conscious decision to click reply, type a reply, and hit send. Based on what you said, it’s obvious you felt slighted but couldn’t actually formulate a counterargument so you just came up with whatever cliched buzzword came to your mind. Still waiting on why what I said was dishonest…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:26 AM
1

Well unless you’re a bot you chose to reply for a reason. I can only guess why…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:21 AM
1

Well, you replied. Seems like you value defending your flawed opinions more than you value your peace. There was never a fire to begin with. You’re right! Bad faith commenters like you made it so though!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:20 AM
2

Cool, looks like you aren’t here to have real discussions. If you actually wanted to change my mind you’d point out what was wrong with what I said. Not surprised, most women are here to add fuel to the flames.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:16 AM
2

Why is it dishonest? You are being wildly vague and I think it’s because you don’t want to face the issue with your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:15 AM
3

Just because you claim it’s dishonest doesn’t make it dishonest. I quite literally took out “women” and “something” and replaced it with “racists” and “giving minorities equal rights”. Please go ahead and point out the dishonesty?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:13 AM
3

This is essentially what a conservative would’ve said during the civil rights era in defense of segregation. Not saying you are a racist yourself, that would be ludicrous, but your argument can be rearranged like: “Claiming that racists are cowards for not allowing minorities to have equal rights because it isn’t socially normal or expected is stupid lol” Do you seriously want society to act like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:08 AM
4

Lmao yep, their argument could be applied to basically any social norms that have changed over the last couple decades. It’s literally why conservatism is so deeply ingrained in our society, because so many people are plenty happy just coasting by with what the system gives them. It’s like men saying “Why would we be cowards for not wanting to give women the right to vote, it’s not socially normal for that to be the case?”. Like obviously that’s a terrible argument. Women can vote now and look a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:04 AM
1

Noooo, attaching all their self worth to arbitrary societal expectations is muchhh more worthwhile
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 02:40 AM
–

Sounds like you’re just arguing to argue because that’s literally what they said
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 02:21 AM
1

No hate meant! I just literally haven’t met a single other person who plays Candy Crush than my 49 year old aunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:05 PM
3

Totally agree, I was more so saying there are much better examples of primarily female spaces considered nerdy by most of the general public than a book fandom that can’t muster more than 20k people across two reddit forums. I mean honestly, OP’s reference to SCA chapters is probably the best point they made. Even talking about cosplay or comicons or whatnot would’ve been a good point, their overall argument just sucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:02 PM
1

I’m sensing a lack of joy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:48 PM
1

Looks like between both subreddits there’s a total membership of 20k. Whereas the Wicked subreddit alone has 460k. Anyways, I think your point could be stronger in the future, because there definitely are too many men who are absolutely clueless about what nerdy women are into, and not just niche circles like Anne of Green Gables.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:47 PM
1

Stardew Valley? The Sims? Geometry Dash? Hollow Knight? Celeste? Are these not real video games or something Candy Crush is what 40 year old women play, so I guess if you’re 40 as well, maybe there’s some truth to what you’re saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:41 PM
1

Send me the forum, I’d love to learn about it if it’s a real thing
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:34 PM
1

Nearly all of my female friends play video games. I genuinely don’t know what planet you live on
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:31 PM
2

Well aside from the fact that my comment was a joke, I’ve literally never seen or heard of anyone being into Anne of Green Gables enough to call it a “fandom” lol Like, I get the Wizard of Oz and Wicked, or Hamilton, or just musicals in general, a bunch of my friends are into those Or being into reading, but Anne of Green Gables? That’s like me saying women haven’t yet figured out about the Clifford the Big Red Dog fandom and that’s why nerdy women don’t find any good guys
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:29 PM
1

Oh I’m well aware that most women on this sub are only here to rage bait and that actual moderation is basically nonexistent. But to say that somehow means no woman genuinely likes nerd shit or gaming is silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:25 PM
0

Can I ask: Do you live on Earth?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:20 PM
1

TIL women subscribe to the “Anne of Green Gables” fandom
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:14 PM
1

TIL women subscribe to the “Anne of Green Gables” fandom
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:14 PM
13

If literally all you care about in life is getting laid right up until your looks fade I have a feeling, based on my experience, that there are more people that share this sentiment than we really want to admit, at least in younger demographics. Lots of people that are attractive seem to just go through the motions and are on a collision course for massive mid life crises when they eventually realize living life vicariously through their social media presence ends up not being fulfilling despite…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 08:48 PM
3

Why are we talking about blue states and blue areas vs. red states and red areas? I think he was pretty clear he was primarily talking about rural areas (which red states happen to contain more of). It, quite literally, is a statistic. Just saying it isn’t is asinine: https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2025/august/us-obesity-rate-changes-differ-for-rural-and-urban-areas-as-well-as-across-regions
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:25 AM
7

Have you seen the Hulk before? The point is roided-out monsters like that are one in a million, and that the less successful but still noticeable examples of steroid use have become the standard for too many. It’s honestly a massive issue. Plenty of my friends have begun glorifying steroid use because plenty of fitness influencers have started going “open” about their own use. Young men should not be pushed into PED usage to get to some warped perception of “shredded” or “big” just as women shou…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 01:58 AM
4

And why exactly is this a thought that crossed your mind? Driving a guy to suicide? I don’t get either of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:48 AM
–

Y’all are funny
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 04:11 AM
3

Is trolling your one and only pasttime?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:34 PM
2

It’s absolutely a relic of sex-negative culture that pushes women into being ambiguous about their interest in men. Public sentiment towards expressing sexuality has changed over time, but prevailing behavior and communication patterns continue to be disconnected from said sentiment. This is why there’s so many contradictions when this topic is discussed. People’s opinions simply don’t match their actions, because their environments (or their egos, let’s be real) don’t allow for it. Like, I’m ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 04:42 AM
1

I wish this sub banned bait accounts like yours. Have a good day <3
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 03:51 AM
1

Oh I’m sorry, I forgot I needed to weigh the opinions of obvious troll accounts on the same level as people who actually want to participate in good faith conversation. Inb4 “the negative karma means I’m actually right”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:18 AM
1

I saw the /s So I’m not sure what you mean by the rest of your comment? I’m agreeing with you by mocking OP’s logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:37 AM
3

But how is one supposed to know that the guy who clearly doesn’t floss also doesn’t want to take out the trash or clean the bathroom? /s It’s sad it’s gotten to the point that people like GoldSaifin respond so passive-aggressively when someone suggests the unbelievable notion of not dating men who live like farm animals outside of the bar, club, or the 5 photos they’ve uploaded to Hinge lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:25 AM
3

Plenty of dudes will get scratched, kicked, punched, bitten, or have their hair ripped out during sex. I’ve heard it from all of my friends (and have experienced it personally in a more limited capacity), but they just put up with it because they feel like it would “ruin the mood” to bring it up or that they’ve “gotten that far” so they should just ignore it. Lots of people are just total dipshits for better or for worse, and we as a society are wayyyy too easy on stupidity and really bad at rec…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:31 AM
–

This account was created a day ago and only posts rage bait in incel subreddits. GTFO
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 12:37 AM
0

God, could we yell this a little louder for the people in the back?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 03:36 AM
7

This sub is slowly dying but I still believe that bad faith commenters need to get banned. It’s mind numbing to read through the replies of 1% commenters who seem to just exist here to stick their fingers in their ears and ragebait endlessly. Like, the sub is called “purple pill debate” not “purple pill pissing contest” so can we keep it to debate?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 06:26 AM
1

0/10 bait
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 06:21 AM
11

Don’t you get it? You’re being manipulative. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 06:21 AM
6

Fed has been sounding the alarm for a while. They decided to drop rates twice to appease Trump but it’s clear Powell knows what’s happening, watch his recent talk after the last rate cut where he talks about the “two-tiered economy” being propped up by the AI bubble. Once that bubble pops? I’ve said this on this sub before, but dating will be the least of everyone’s worries. Super stagflation inbound.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 06:19 AM
1

Top 1% Commenter Why am I not surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 05:10 AM
3

Agreed. As long as 90% of this sub is random middle-aged women rage baiting and a handful of retards that fall for it hook, line, and sinker there’s genuinely never gonna be quality discourse again. It feels like talking to a brick wall sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 04:11 AM
2

As always, their gripes are less with feminism and more with the patriarchy clinging on desperately.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 04:44 AM
2

Holy appeal to nature batman!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:46 PM
3

I never said I did. And yet you implied pretty heavily that women are either looking for their “dream house” or they have the expand their options and include “houses with broken windows and no roofs”. I mean that’s such a clear false dichotomy you would’ve done well to clarify. So you are less social Uhh, no, that’s where you’re wrong and I think most young people are confused before they gain enough life experience to understand what “sociability” is. Sociability is not being the loudest or mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 01:06 AM
12

This is strange, do you really think the world is divided up into “social” and “unsociable”? Like the only two options are a highly confident and outgoing stud or a quiet, scared, awkward creep? I don’t know about you, but I live in the real world, and I and the rest of my friends have never had an issue socializing, going to music festivals, hitting up bars, etc, but we aren’t the highlight of the party or the loudest crowd in the room. For younger people, just being “social” is not enough. You…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 12:35 AM
–

This kinda stuff is so intriguing to me as someone who’s been getting into modern philosophy but I can’t help but feel like it’s falling on deaf ears in a subreddit like this. Nice compilation though, dropped a follow!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:42 AM
1

If their post history is anything to go off they literally don’t date men, they’re just getting mad over nothing like half of this thread. It’s pretty insane and proves OP’s point entirely how many people here creep out of the woodwork just to shit on autistic people
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:16 AM
1

Good god please take your whining elsewhere. He’s saying that it’s shouldn’t be a common thing for most people to find a completely uncontrollable aspect of someone undatable. Like seriously? Half of y’all in this comment thread are just taking the piss
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:13 AM
–

The more I read the replies to this post the more it looks like the thread of pure evil and hatred. Genuinely what is your problem with autistic people??
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:09 AM
–

Welcome to Earth bro, was it your first day two weeks ago? Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:07 AM
1

I cannot believe you’ve decided to lecture me on construction sites, this is beyond parody lmao. I’m really hoping this account is a bot because I can’t imagine a human sitting on the other side of this conversation and typing out this rambling nonsensical response to what I said. Again, you aren’t looking for a husband, you’re looking for a robot who looks hot in front of your parents and can build things.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 10:24 PM
1

Cool, and now it’s what? 2025? Life isn’t like it was in the 20th century anymore. Men don’t just exist to be ordered around and women don’t just exist to sit there and look pretty, a partner is more than your personal construction manager. Notice how you make up a strawman about this ugly, disgusting, insecurity-riddled concept of a man who your mother would laugh her ass off about. It sounds like you think a man is either capable of everything you want him to be or he’s a gross, mentally-ill n…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 10:06 PM
0

Sometimes I need him to be there and manage crews of workers Dude, I hate it break it to you, but you might want to go looking for men on construction sites, because you aren’t going to find a guy who can “build or remodel your house along with leading crews of workers” on any old day in any old place lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:48 PM
2

“It looks like the Roman Empire is going to speed run how fast it can be conquered by the Germanic tribes.” “It looks like the European, African, and Asian peoples are going to speed run how fast they can get infected by the Bubonic Plague.” “It looks like the monarchs are going to speed run turning over their empires to the people in bloody revolutions.” Yep, most configurations of human civilization, no matter how powerful, will eventually fall, who would’ve thought? If the dollar continues to…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 07:25 AM
2

Atheism and agnosticism baby! We don’t have to deal with these wild contradictions because we accept that the world is arbitrarily and wildly unfair, and then try to amend that as well as we can.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 07:19 AM
3

You look great bro!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 11:52 PM
4

But clearly being a “cave troll” doesn’t bring them joy because they’re here complaining about how women won’t date them for their looks. You cannot have your cake and eat it too, sometimes life requires effort unfortunately, even if it is unfair.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 11:50 PM
3

c is next to v on the keyboard
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:01 PM
1

“Nobody wants to work anymore!”
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 09:30 PM
1

Why not? Because it isn’t, go ahead and look it up. Only around 30% of US adults have ever used a dating app. Stop, you are embarrassing yourself. This is fucking laughable. Are you serious with this shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 03:43 AM
2

I’m not basing this on the dating app stats because that doesn’t paint a clear picture of the entire dating scene. This is what I’m talking about, you guys take the 20% stat as gospel when there are so many people that have never touched a dating app in their life and do fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 09:35 PM
1

Right, agreed. Wayyy too many people give up before they’ve even had the chance to fail. Like, I can often tell who on this subreddit has actually been active in the dating scene vs. those who are basing their views of it entirely off what they’ve read online.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 03:25 AM
1

I think the issue is that it’s more like 40% of men (above average), but people here like to take on this defeatist mindset that only the most elite and stupid attractive “chads” get women. Nah, I think it’s more so: 20% of men get a lot of women or end up with the apex of women, 20% are attractive enough to get pretty consistent hookups because the top 20 are quite rare to come across, 10-30% in the middle get into relationships here and there but don’t get hookups, and then the bottom 30% are …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 01:33 AM
1

While I get where you’re coming from and don’t want to be overly pessimistic, the issue I’m seeing is that the same problems that are spawned on most short-form video platforms like TikTok, YT shorts, and Instagram Reels, would carry over in an implementation of the same thing to dating apps. Adding some sort of audition or interview feature would help alleviate some of the problems you get with the limited amount of personal info you can put on your profile. However, like I said, it’ll still ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 10:08 PM
2

Unfortunately I don’t think that would help. Anyone could easily put on a face or act the way they think will land them the most matches, even if uploading videos of yourself was the standard. You’d end up with the same problem just via a different route.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:20 PM
1

That’s literally what he said
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:26 PM
1

I deadass don’t know what you’re trying to say here, because those words were never in the same sentence, and their position seems pretty reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:25 PM
1

1st point: Okay then my numbers are off for domestic violence cases… except that study only accounts for adults aged 18-28 in 2001, not for historical trends in domestic violence. That study doesn’t say anything about men older than 28 and doesn’t delve into the data from before or after 2001. Additionally, I don’t think 70% of women committing non-reciprocal violence in relationships is a useful number when you consider that the reason that figure is so high is most likely because those men are…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 02:06 AM
1

I don’t think you understand how intrinsic violence is to masculinity. Who were the hunters of old times? Who plays the most physical sports? Who runs the MMA, WWE, and other boxing organizations? What do boys do with their friends? What demographic accounts for 95% of domestic abuse cases? Hell, who, up until recent times, fought in wars? I’m sorry, but you can’t look at me with a straight face and say that you get upset when the APA rightfully labels violence as a masculine quality. It’s not l…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 12:55 AM
1

Soooo you just argued for literally zero reason. Nice
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 04:49 PM
1

What do you think traditional masculinity is then? Holding the door for your madam and bringing her roses on her birthday after coming back from war? There is a particular constellation of standards that have held sway over segments of the population, including: Anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk, and violence. Oh so the “horrible awful disgusting APA guidelines” are… making an observation on toxic masculinity. Tell me, oh wise one, if those…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 12:52 AM
0

Lmao, you’re being so incredibly vague about this whole thing when ctrl-c ctrl-v exists dude. I already know the APA guidelines don’t say what you or the other commenter think it does. Stop getting your panties in a bunch over nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 12:37 AM
1

Cultural Christianity, ever heard of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:33 PM
3

Cuz whatever that guy’s whining about doesn’t actually exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:47 PM
1

Wow, out of a sample size of two.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:15 PM
1

You expect me to troll your entire profile before posting a one-off ragebait comment? Jesus bro yall need to stop projecting and get off Reddit for a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 02:31 AM
1

Try reading. What a sad attempt at trolling, if you can even call this that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 02:17 PM
1

I’m sure your girlfriend would agree that spending your time in a Reddit thread arguing with people that aren’t actually incels by any stretch of the imagination is a total waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 02:15 PM
1

Maybe she’d appreciate if you weren’t screaming into the void on this dying subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 02:12 PM
1

Projectionnnn
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:56 PM
2

Is your only purpose here to comment shitty ragebait? Go outside lil bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 10:02 PM
2

I’m not miserable Exclusively posts on PPD and AskMen Sure dude
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 10:00 PM
1

In what world do good people put down others? I hate that this shit is normalized to the point that someone who is “normally a nice person” can treat people they don’t even know with such malice that they might as well be talking about a rat or some garbage they discarded. I couldn’t even fathom saying anything to the effect of what you’ve listed, and the people I know wouldn’t either. So either the people you’re talking about don’t exist or are worse humans than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 01:24 AM
2

Well if that’s how you view passivity then you should’ve probably said that outright. I’m sure you can think of situations in which there is an attractive, outgoing man who you’d like to hit on. You would just pass up the opportunity to date a man like that because he didn’t think to ask you out first? Seems more like you’re passive and value an active man to even you out, in which case I’m not really sure why you’re engaging in this discussion because your situation doesn’t apply at all to what…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 07:24 PM
1

Well, I’m not saying these are passive men, that’s just you filling in the gaps. The guys you are asking out should be people you are attracted to first and foremost, which is most likely confident men. Doesn’t mean you can’t beat him to the punch and ask him out first🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 07:05 PM
3

I mean it can’t be that hard to tell when a guy is just dating to have an easy chance at getting laid vs. dating because he’s into you. Like, you asked him out because you liked him in the first place, not because you felt like he was lonely and you wanted to cheer him up. Some random loser isn’t going to be the guy you pick, so the basis should already be there for mutual attraction. If you aren’t getting what you want out of a relationship, then dump the guy. I don’t understand how the possibi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 07:02 PM
2

Yeah anyone who knows they’re autistic enough to understand, process, and talk about it effectively online are not autistic enough to not function properly, they just often aren’t learned enough to effectively engage with society. I agree with you there. ADHD I don’t think is an adequate excuse for not being able to date. If anything I’ve seen a lot of people with ADHD being amazing at socializing and actually way more successful in the dating world, just not as successful career-wise (but that …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 07:34 AM
3

Not relative to how society functions currently. There’s a huge body of study behind psychology that decides just that. I understand it’s arbitrary, and that the distinction in many cases is unnecessary, but that some people do possess symptoms to a degree of severity which makes it far more difficult for them to function properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:37 AM
4

Doesn’t mean they’re all to the same degree of symptoms. Hence why it’s called a “spectrum” and not a binary.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:31 AM
2

What I’m saying is that saying every average woman is “relatively unattractive and fat compared to Sofia Vergara” is such a truism it doesn’t even need to be stated. It’s like saying the average man is “relatively poor and unsuccessful compared to Jeff Bezos”. It literally means nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:43 PM
–

Homie, your brain is COOKED if you instinctively compare most women to SOFIA VERGARA
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:25 PM
–

I’ve seen some of the most dirt poor, ambition-less people walk around with designers clothes and accessories. It’s a one time purchase and indicates nothing other than one’s inability to manage their impulses unless they have an entire wardrobe full of designer clothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:20 PM
1

I think I know one singular person who bases his attraction on if a woman has a BBL, fake lashes, or plump lips. The vast majority of men don’t gaf about extreme cosmetic procedures, and the vast majority of women don’t get them. I don’t see what the problem is here. Seems rather self-inflicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 05:45 PM
2

Are you sure you’re blue pill mate?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 05:27 PM
1

I’m 17 and haven’t made my first million yet, is my life done??
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 08:42 PM
1

Sorry, I’m not OP? Why are you assigning OPs or the other commenters’ viewpoints to me? It’s so strange how I come in with my own argument and opinion and yet you act as though I should defend everyone else’s viewpoint. This is madness, blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:58 PM
2

That was the entire topic of conversation??? When social interaction between men and women is appropriate? I’m going to leave it off at I agree with you on most points, but you’re shooting yourself in the foot acting as though I want you to tolerate pick up artistry or harassment. It’s putting words in my mouth and completely derails any semblance of faithful conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:55 PM
1

I implore you to reread the entire thread and take in every word. I’m not defending pick up artistry, I was expressing confusion about what you were saying, because as I already said the opinion I assumed you held seemed ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:52 PM
1

Exactly. It’s like a rudder arguing with the sail.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:49 PM
1

Again, that second quote refers to how cynical you are being about social interactions. Incredibly black and white thought while playing both sides of the conversation. It’s laborious to argue with you because you so egregiously miss the point of what I’m saying that I’ve had to repeat it in several different variations to see if anything would make sense to you. Apparently I was wrong to think I could have an actual, faithful discussion with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:48 PM
2

Wow, you really don’t know how to read. Here, I’m going to paste the comment again so you can try one more time: The issue here is thinking I’m speaking completely in black and white. The scale of “appropriate social interactions” doesn’t go from helping the elderly straight to harassing women in your local Costco. I’m not conflating the two, but you were making it rather difficult to understand exactly what types of situations you were referring to. I couldn’t tell if you believed that all soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:41 PM
2

I’m really hoping it’s that and not just bad faith trolling because I really do believe what I’m talking about and it would’ve been a total waste of time to write all that. It felt less like I was arguing with a person and more like a broken record. I can only repeat myself so many times until my eyes roll into the back of my head from the point being missed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:39 PM
2

Literally quoted you claiming that I’d regard strangers making small talk or elderly needing help with a creepy, entitled shithead… Why don’t you go read my comment where I explained that I wasn’t conflating the two. Not very hard, it’s about two replies up in this thread. And telling women to carry a gun to ward off men with shitty manners is fucking insane. Holy shit lady, stick to a fucking topic. Are you talking about generally weird assholes or are you talking about men who back you into a …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:23 PM
1

Man I’m really starting to think you actually aren’t reading what I’m even writing in my comments, or not grasping the point, at the very least. I, verbatim, said: If you’re talking about men being violent or putting you in a dangerous situation, don’t hesitate to take every precaution necessary. So you firing back with something like: Most men aren’t dangerous or creepy. Men who follow women around until they’re isolated is super fucking creepy. Doesn’t exactly make sense, because you’re essent…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:07 PM
1

The issue here is thinking I’m speaking completely in black and white. The scale of “appropriate social interactions” doesn’t go from helping the elderly straight to harassing women in your local Costco. I’m not conflating the two, but you were making it rather difficult to understand exactly what types of situations you were referring to. I couldn’t tell if you believed that all social interactions with men in public were unwarranted and inappropriate, or just if the negative interactions were …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 09:08 PM
2

Are you sure you and I are reading the same comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:16 PM
2

You’ve exaggerated absolutely everything Preposterous statement, show me anything in my response that I exaggerated or stretched to unrealistic lengths. This genuinely seems like you not wanting to engage with any of my arguments and just continue repeating what you’ve already been saying. Many, if not most, flip the fuck out when rejected. Which is why I have repeatedly advocated for being armed or otherwise prepared for a dangerous situation like that. I got mugged in my home city once. Intens…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:07 PM
1

Lol wut? Doesn’t seem like this guy deems women attractive by thinking with his dick
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:41 PM
1

No, but some men get in women’s faces demanding their time and attention I agree that this happens all too often, but it’s one thing to disapprove of this behavior as opposed to only expecting men to ever approach women when both parties are mutually interested. Unfortunately, it’s nigh impossible to know if a woman is interested enough in public to initiate anything romantic, so unless you’re advocating for exclusively online dating, you’re just gonna have to deal with the kinks in the current …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:27 PM
2

Does a used car salesman walk off his lot to go sell cars to randoms in the grocery store? Where I’m from, people actually have to go to the dealership with the intent of buying a car, and if they don’t like the business, price, model, or what have you, they’ll go somewhere else. Stop expecting the world to hold your hand through social interaction. One random guy hitting on you at the grocery store is hardly the end of the world. And if you’re worried about more dangerous situations? Just arm y…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:02 PM
1

I’ve had women tell me they genuinely hated me for not asking them out when the only “signals” I received were indifference and dryness in dms and occasional eye contact which was in no way noticeably different from anyone else looking in my direction. Hints are dumb asf, it doesn’t matter if OP hasn’t experienced them firsthand. Stop with the games and make it obvious you like the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 06:58 PM
2

Do you actually interact with people in real life like this? It’s totally inane to expect permission any time you want to talk to someone wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 06:46 PM
1

If you wanted to get a job, you wouldn’t wait for companies to come knocking at your door begging you to work for them, because that’s stupid and unrealistic. But when it comes to dating, I guess mutual effort and agency is absolutely unthinkable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 06:32 PM
3

Right? This sounds like some slice of life game where all the women are video game characters and this guy was the main character. No way in hell this actually happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 05:59 AM
9

Sounds rather vague, and you can hardly conflate “leftists” with “left of center moderates” for chrissakes. If you want to make an argument, maybe just talk about the fact that we seem to have too many liberals focused on the wrong issues, instead of filling a reply with enough straw men to fill a cornfield on a subreddit which isn’t exactly concerned with labeling Trump a Nazi or wondering whether Israel is illegitimate. One thing at a time dude
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 01:30 PM
9

Literally none of those are left of center moderate beliefs. Do you support mass shootings at conservative rallies/protests? Get a grip dude, Jesus.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 01:24 PM
1

Again, if attraction is assumed, so should basic qualities like kindness. You shouldn’t have to specify either as a woman, because the men who are attractive and aren’t kind obviously aren’t worth your time in the first place. You definitely shouldn’t have to tell a man to be kind for them to be kind, that defeats the purpose and honestly just makes it look like they’re kowtowing in an act of appeasement instead of just being a decent person.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 12:45 PM
1

The main point you seemed stuck on was that men being physically attractive was such an important factor that it didn’t need stating whereas men “treating women like human beings” was something that needed to be specified. The problem here being why the former is valued more than the latter. And I, as the other commenter seemed to be, am referring to what women are looking for in relationships. You seem to be able to extend your logic only to the part about physical attractiveness, but not about…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 12:20 PM
1

Can you please at least try to be logically consistent? A lot of women on this sub just make incels look good.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 11:37 AM
–

Well if you take the time to read what I had to say, you’d see that I absolutely was engaging with the context, it’s just that the context was broadly nonsensical. Good luck out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:02 PM
–

Ah, I see you aren’t interested in having any discussions where it isn’t immediately apparent what points to cherry pick. Glad I tried I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 10:55 PM
–

Okay first of all, I’m not OP, so saying “I” brought up anything is flat out wrong. Third spaces have existed in society forever, only recently have they started degrading and dying out because of a combination of factors including, but not limited to: Late-stage capitalism, gentrification, inflation, overconsumption, and the internet (i.e. social media). In fact, nobody ITT from what I can gather ever mentioned that third spaces “need to be built for dating specifically”. What I can see is that…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 10:48 PM
1

Yeah that graph is one the worst cases of data misrepresentation I’ve ever seen tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 10:40 PM
1

Do you seriously believe that adding more neutral third spaces is going to contribute to women being harassed? Women are already harassed in private spaces and whatnot because men and women don’t mix very often due to a lack of socialization. But yeah, the solution throughout history for problems in integration has always been to segregate people and never let them actually meet the other side on an even playing field. That worked really well in the 1900s, I’m sure doing it for men and women is …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 10:23 PM
1

Quite self-explanatory really.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:58 PM
1

Lmao right? If it was that easy Reddit in general wouldn’t even exist. In fact, if everyone just “sucked it up and moved on” literally nobody would be having discussion because what’s the point? Life’s not fair so you should just put your head down and shut up. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:21 PM
2

Did I measure development with GDP? Way to put words in my mouth. China doesn’t have the largest GDP because it’s developing, because its GDP per capita is low, and because its people are poor. That doesn’t mean its economy isn’t growing, what kind of stupid statement is that? China still does the manufacturing of most of the free world. Your societies “organized around a sacred object” would fail pretty quickly if China stopped that trade.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:07 AM
1

Then the communists (which you like) came to power Ah, you mean the red fascists? I absolutely do not “like” the communists of the USSR or wherever you hail from, and the fact you think I do is laughable. It absolutely is the government schools that are at fault for the competence crisis And why do you think that is? You’ve given me nothing but vague claims that “the government” made it worse. How? Leftism is a violent poison Leftists also, got you out of the great depression, gave women rights,…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:00 AM
1

I would read that article again. It says immediately: Despite major achievements in modernization — the country’s GDP is only second to that of the United States — China still has a long way to go before it becomes a “developed country”. Although China has made great economic progress, its development is uneven. So clearly China’s economy is growing and currently very strong, and that fact is affirmed by the article you say disproves me. It’s just that the country isn’t “developed” which has a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:45 AM
1

“Nothing is worse than government schools” except public education is the only reason you and I are able to talk about this right now. How do you think your parents and your parent’s parents learned how to read? It wasn’t because they were all homeschooled, that’s absurd. Do you think it’s the government schools leading people to vote conservative all over the world? That our economy is collapsing? Also good luck learning anything beyond a high school level, people say they can teach themselves …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:37 AM
2

That’s because public education gets funded less and less in America, to push kids into evangelical christian private schools and destroy actual learning. The government wants more kids to be illiterate so they can be put into the workforce and not know enough to fight for their rights. The school voucher program is an example of that. Homeschooling is a bandaid to the actual problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:41 AM
2

China continues to be secularly based and its economy is growing insanely fast and on track to become the largest in the world especially if the US continues to hurt itself. Saying that society must be structured around a sacred object is just ignorant of reality. Really seems like theological societies tend to hate each other more and kill each other more. Also, the existence of religion in many places gives rise to extremism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:35 AM
6

So are we just going to assume the economy won’t adapt? Humans have survived for centuries through all sorts of population increases and declines. It literally isn’t the end of the world. While climate change and overpopulation/overconsumption will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:26 AM
1

For your own mental wellbeing stay off this subreddit lmao. I don’t get OPs mindset either.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter