TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sam__Toucan Archive

View 10 posts and 331 comments by Sam__Toucan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I know a lot of men who who go around bashing women so I wouldn't say it doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 07:08 AM
1

Dating strategy is not men's rights. Women have the right to do all the things you list in your post
/r/MensRights22/05/26 07:05 AM
16

Apologies I didn't read the wall of text. Where did you get the idea that all you can lose is 50% of your assets? I know many people that have lost way more than that?
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:43 PM
20

My boss has a deadbeat wife. She goes to the gym and socialises all day. The nanny looks after the kids. He pays for everything.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 12:32 PM
0

Where did you post it? I'm guessing in a female dominated sub where you knew it would upset them. Perhaps just leave them to their echo chamber
/r/MensRights19/03/26 03:41 PM
-1

How does the child benefit in this situation
/r/MensRights19/03/26 03:37 PM
5

Can you find any comparable cases where a man did a similar thing and got worse?
/r/MensRights18/03/26 12:41 PM
4

Very few (if any) of these "Boss Babes" created the businesses they are running. Unless by "business" you mean a 1 person operation which is basically themselves leveraging their good looks to promote products on social media
/r/MensRights17/03/26 02:55 PM
-17

Agree, the cop was doing their job and deserves to be treated first. Gender is irrelevant in this instance
/r/MensRights14/03/26 09:16 AM
1

Did AI write this post?
/r/MensRights07/02/26 09:16 PM
-3

He should just pay for a cleaner or housekeeper to do his share
/r/MensRights07/02/26 09:14 PM
2

There's no need to cold approach when you can just use an app
/r/MensRights07/02/26 09:14 AM
2

I've been where you are. You need to accept that this is war and she won't stop. Ever. You need to fight your corner and do the best you can to keep your children out of the crossfire.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 09:11 AM
1

Yes because it's used selectively. I could say it's always people of a particular race, religion or social class and be even more accurate but we're not allowed to
/r/MensRights07/02/26 09:08 AM
6

They're not all redacted because Sarah Fergusson is in there
/r/MensRights03/02/26 01:48 PM
-16

There is no fair way this can be implemented. The child deserves a father in their life because fathers matter. ANYTHING we can do to maximise the chances of a child having an engaged father must be done. This includes forcing fathers to pay for children they have sired.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 01:37 PM
0

No they don't
/r/MensRights21/12/25 11:21 AM
0

Your solution will create an underclass of kids growing up with broke single mums that make poor choices. It's not fair to the kids and not good for society. Dads are an important part of children's lives and we should be doing everything we can to keep them engaged.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 11:19 AM
0

No thanks. I don't want a bunch of kids without dad's.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:19 PM
-6

Leftist has nothing to do with it
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:17 PM
31

I can't see this working for them politically. The world has moved on and everyone knows 11 year old are not the problem
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:17 PM
3

I read through the case. The man got almost everything he asked for and the woman got very little. The man got full custody of the children and about 70% of the assets. There's no way the club membership is worth 100k but it still comes from the woman's share. The 12 months maintenance is irrelevant considering the assets are in the millions. If the genders were reversed and the man was the nutter would he have got screwed more? Probably, but in this case it was a win for the man.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 12:51 PM
5

You're forgetting there is a child involved here and they deserve to be looked after. All you're considering is the man vs the woman.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 04:40 PM
-1

You can't predict the future any more than I can. But the fact remains. This article is wrong. Rape trials are not covered by these new rules.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 09:38 AM
-27

Rubbish article because rape trials are exempted from these new rules
/r/MensRights30/11/25 11:58 AM
2

There are millions of men and women living happy lives together, blissfully unaware of the battles going on between feminists and MRAs. Strive to be like that.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 12:49 PM
8

Who cares if they need us or not? Just do my own thing. If they want to be left alone that's fine with me
/r/MensRights27/11/25 02:33 PM
6

Step 1 - "Lose" your job Step 2 - Woman leaves Step 3 - Get a new job WINNER
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:10 PM
5

He's not getting married so can't get a prenup
/r/MensRights11/11/25 07:54 AM
9

Rubbish. I'm a single dad to a girl and are definitely NOT a feminist
/r/MensRights11/11/25 07:47 AM
76

The sad reality is that outside men's rights groups, nobody cares about this issue. All they care is that somebody pays so the mother is not a burden on society . My ex incorrectly reported me for underpaying child support, and I got hit with a 20% penalty. Even though I provided the child maintenance service with proof I had paid everything, and they agreed I was right it took 12 months and a letter to my local member of parliament to get this penalty removed. And of course I can't get reimburs…
/r/MensRights08/11/25 10:21 AM
6

Your problem is you worry too much about how women judge you. Very few men judge if someone wants a tradwife, only non-tradwife women do that. Stop worrying about them and just date who you want
/r/MensRights06/11/25 02:02 PM
5

It's probably better for men if she removes herself from the dating pool
/r/MensRights05/11/25 09:45 AM
-2

Yes. It appears we're reaching peak misogyny in this sub
/r/MensRights03/11/25 09:55 AM
-1

This is a case where a man drugged his wife and had other men have sex with her while she was non responsive. The defendents tried to argue she was a willing participant because she never said "no". The law needed to be changed.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 01:52 PM
-7

Well for starters don't assume that no response from a woman you've drugged equals consent. Which is what happened in this case.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 01:47 PM
13

The real problem for this woman was living in New York while taking a job in Philadelphia. These were both choices she made yet somehow it's societies fault.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 09:18 AM
169

A few women travelling in relative comfort while the rest of us cram into the other carriages. No thanks. Also what's to stop a man boarding the all woman carriage.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 10:38 AM
1

She says it's bad but is unable to articulate a reason why. Half of the article is just her talking about her own childhood
/r/MensRights27/10/25 03:35 PM
0

Did you make this all up or is there some evidence you can produce to prove it?
/r/MensRights27/10/25 03:30 PM
2

Marcus Aurelius meditations is what you want
/r/MensRights24/10/25 03:52 PM
297

"Centrist dad" is an insult? What does that even mean
/r/MensRights23/10/25 11:27 AM
17

I read the report. Their "research" is rubbish. The source for deciding that courts were inappropriately deciding children should have contact with both parents is a study prepared by Mosac (mothers of sexually abused children) . This study "explored the experiences of 19 Black, Asian and ethnic minority parents who had been involved in child arrangement cases, and 10 parents whose cases involved alleged child sexual abuse". So a study of 29 predominately non-white parents, prepared by pro-mothe…
/r/MensRights22/10/25 08:39 PM
3

There was no need for this change. There were already rules preventing children from going to stay with a dangerous parent. This just opens up the door for a mother to say a child is better off without seeing their father and prevent visitation even if the father has done nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 07:59 PM
1

If you leave the country and never come back there's not much they can do
/r/MensRights21/10/25 07:43 PM
2

Well they are hurt more. Duh
/r/MensRights21/10/25 11:30 AM
3

The mistake is assuming all women (or men) are the same. Some women DO have these traits. Redpill tactics will help you get these women. However the best women are not like this. They don't play games and don't want to date assholes. They definitely don't want to date guys who neg them and do other redpill tactics on them. That's why you need to leave redpill. You'll never get the best women that way.
/r/ExRedPill20/10/25 10:00 AM
1

I suspect his feelings relate to the women he is meeting rather than women in general. I went through a period like that after my divorce but in time I realised there were good ones out there too. If your dad is a smart guy as you say, he'll probably figure it out by himself.
/r/ExRedPill20/10/25 09:00 AM
1

Don't take legal action it will ruin your life. Just get through grad school, leave academia and get a job in industry where the bias will be less.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 07:51 AM
0

There are some great posts in this sub but unfortunately there are also a lot of misogynists. Ever since subs like incel, redpill, MGTOW got shut down they all came here
/r/MensRights18/10/25 07:47 AM
1

The "better men" that you mention probably left the university long ago for a higher paying job elsewhere
/r/MensRights15/10/25 02:03 PM
1

The advice given in that post is good advice. Speaking up is a bad idea unless he has more to go on than his own informal observations.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 02:01 PM
4

Some topics are fine (e.g. who pays) but many dating posts are just people complaining that women don't want to date people like them. Dating choices are not a men's rights issue. There is no right to have a girlfriend or get laid.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:38 AM
2

Patriarchy is the top 1% of men that control everything. Chivalry is the bottom 99% of men that are supposed to put women's needs above their own. Agree opting out of chivalry is in our best interests. Treat them the same as we treat each other.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:29 AM
1

Clementine Ford
/r/MensRights20/09/25 06:45 PM
0

I think you replied to the wrong post, I never said anything about women being coddled. What I said was women get judged all the time for their sexual pasts. I do it, and so do you
/r/MensRights18/09/25 08:47 PM
-18

Women get judged all the time for their sexual past, read some of the posts in this sub! You're just wrong
/r/MensRights16/09/25 01:33 PM
0

I find this statistic very hard to believe. How was it estimated?
/r/MensRights14/09/25 07:08 AM
1

Spinster
/r/MensRights12/09/25 12:06 PM
7

Wouldn't make a difference as most men swipe right on everything
/r/MensRights10/09/25 11:30 AM
3

Apologies if I'm ignorant of US law, but can't a woman just move to another state and divorce there?
/r/MensRights07/09/25 11:42 AM
5

Many left leaning people don't care about gender issues, they're just poor people who want more handouts from the government
/r/MensRights26/08/25 10:20 AM
13

I predict she claims to be a victim of coercive control and gets away with it
/r/MensRights26/08/25 10:17 AM
3

I've never met a man who decided to get it done as a consenting adult
/r/MensRights25/08/25 10:05 AM
6

I read it. Despite acknowledging girls are ahead of boys, they lead with a headline that implies they're falling behind and that "experts" are alamed
/r/MensRights23/08/25 08:08 AM
-17

I didn't see any of that in the article
/r/MensRights21/08/25 08:16 AM
1

This is not men's rights, it's reddit relationships
/r/MensRights20/08/25 02:05 PM
5

Very few people actually think that, they're mostly just pretending. Men pretend "women are wonderful" to get laid. Women pretend "women are wonderful" otherwise they will be rejected by other women. Neither group really believes this.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 01:52 PM
1

Everyone knows this is a factor, but it can't be mentioned because it leads to uncomfortable questions that might result in women being worse off after divorce
/r/MensRights14/08/25 03:11 PM
1

You've just got to be aware of this behaviour and leave them if it happens. Not all women are like that. There are (a few) good ones out there.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:14 PM
1

Unfortunately many people on here just want to argue rather than achieve anything
/r/MensRights10/08/25 12:19 PM
7

What's wrong is doing it to someone else without their consent. Presumably you consented as you had it done as a teenager
/r/MensRights10/08/25 12:18 PM
2

Sounds like a troll post to me. Can't shower or dress but earns $70k / year? I don't believe it
/r/MensRights10/08/25 12:13 PM
2

"The judge told him: 'Being married to a rich person for three years does not suddenly catapult you into a right to live like that after the relationship has ended.'" The judge in my UK divorce told me that my ex wife of 5 years WAS entitled to maintain her standard of living after the relationship ended. It may have even been the same judge!
/r/MensRights04/08/25 12:14 PM
83

We need to start teaching our sons that masculinity is not toxic, rather it's something to embrace and be proud of.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 12:11 PM
-2

Another dating post... yawn Has nothing to do with men's rights
/r/MensRights04/08/25 10:07 AM
5

To get laid Duh
/r/MensRights29/07/25 10:06 PM
1

I suspect the issue for the people complaining is that men don't approach THEM anymore
/r/MensRights23/07/25 10:13 AM
2

If life is stagnating you need to shake it up a bit and try something new. Nothing wrong with D&D but perhaps after 5 years it's time for a change - or even just a new group. 3 years volunteering at the same place is also a long time. Find a new job, a new hobby, heck even a new city otherwise one day you'll wake up an old man wondering where your life has gone.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 09:08 AM
1

Can't understand your post bro
/r/MensRights19/07/25 01:14 PM
1

If your target market is feminists then it makes sense
/r/MensRights18/07/25 12:54 PM
0

What's the men's rights issue here? "Woman gets arrested for committing crime" is nothing to do with us
/r/MensRights18/07/25 12:53 PM
1

Agree. Unfortunately since reddit shutdown Redpill, MGTOW many of the people from those subs have come here
/r/MensRights17/07/25 09:52 AM
22

He probably spent more than £25k on lawyers. Also she'll probably never pay as she has no money.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 11:57 AM
1

The good news is that it gets better in time. 10 years ago I lost everything - two houses sold and all the money given to her, no access to my children, even my work visa forcing me to quit my job. I now have a new home, am a citizen, and recently one of my children has decided to come and live with me. I learnt to value things the family court can't take away: my friends, my earning potential and my health.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 03:39 PM
8

IMO a straight up fight is bad for you because the system is biased against men. You risk sounding like an angry man, and the court system sees an angry man as being dangerous. Unless your ex is stupid or a total nutter you will lose. It may even be her strategy to bait you into this fight. My advice is to try and avoid a full on confrontation in court. Get through it, protect what you can and then slowly chip away to improve your position over time.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 12:19 PM
18

If someone makes an accusation over social media instead of going to the police, I'm not inclined to believe them
/r/MensRights07/07/25 11:45 AM
1

Her parents are always going to take her side
/r/MensRights07/07/25 08:06 AM
1

The amount paid and amount someone sees their child should not be related. A child is not a possession that you buy access to
/r/MensRights03/07/25 12:49 PM
2

I don't see how you can both conscript someone against their will and hold them to a physical standard. Otherwise you could just get fat to escape the draft
/r/MensRights03/07/25 12:21 PM
-13

Lots of emotion in your post, do you have any actual data to back it up?
/r/MensRights03/07/25 12:18 PM
1

Well what did you expect when you started arguing with a misandrist?
/r/MensRights28/06/25 07:35 AM
1

You're right. The court is biased against you because you're a man. This is a reality you need to accept because it won't change any time soon. Without knowing the specifics I can't suggest a way forward via legal action. What i can suggest is swallowing your pride and nicely asking your ex for access. Yes it sucks and it's not fair but at least you might to see your kids.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:58 AM
1

Does it really matter what state you live in? Can't the woman just move to a state that is good for her?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 10:23 PM
2

Same experience here. My daughter keeps asking why her friends parents won't let their kids come over for sleepovers and I don't know how to explain it to her.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 10:14 AM
2

The only logical response to this is to never cohabit or have children
/r/MensRights05/06/25 10:10 AM
12

Heh, once you remove people from indigenous communities from the list, that number of 20 gets even smaller - however nobody is allowed to mention this
/r/MensRights02/06/25 08:58 AM
10

It's not just that she put her guard up, she complained to the flight attendants about a man who essentially ignored her, and wants to impose her puritanical views on everyone else.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:41 AM
4

In regards to point 3 I would go even further and be nice to your ex, otherwise you give her ammunition to use against you in court. Be especially nice to her in front of the judge. If she makes a lot of angry accusations against you, and you politely deny them while being nice about her, it creates a clear impression that you're the reasonable one in the relationship.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 09:45 PM
19

"How many times have you read a news article or a comment section that tries to excuse male violence?" Zero.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 07:51 PM
8

According to ABC she got 7.5 years. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-22/corbie-jean-walpole-jailed-setting-jake-loader-on-fire-howlong/105322718
/r/MensRights22/05/25 04:20 PM
7

The real reason it's private is so they don't face scrutiny for the rubbish that goes on in there. There's no reason they couldn't redact names to protect people's privacy.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 04:57 PM
1

When I was in my 20's a senior manager in the office took a liking to me and started harassing me constantly. She was more than 20 years older than me. The other senior managers just laughed at the situation and encouraged her on. They said I was lucky and they wished she was harassing them instead. If I was out after work with colleagues, they would call this manager and tell her where I was so that she could come along and start harassing me again. It only stopped when I quit the job.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 12:28 PM
6

TBH I don't see it. There's traction rolling back trans rights to protect "real women" but not much progress in men's rights
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:17 PM
2

It's easy to have him thrown in jail while they investigate her claims. He probably gets named and shamed as well. Then when the claims are proven false they just quietly let the man out with his life ruined.
/r/MensRights01/05/25 09:22 AM
0

Her defence is that the was scammed, and that's what the article claims is truth. But we've only heard her side of the story. Agree this is not really a men's rights issue
/r/MensRights30/04/25 09:47 AM
6

Everybody lies when they're under pressure - provided they think they can get away with it. "Believe all women" just encourages them to do it more often.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 08:23 AM
1

They're idiots, who cares what they think
/r/MensRights27/04/25 10:30 AM
3

She's wrong in her claim that the family court in London is a male space. As someone who's spent a lot of time there I cam attest that about 50% of judges and barristers are women
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:12 PM
1

Nobody cares about MGTOW apart from people wvho are MGTOW. Which is presumably what they want so everyone wins
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:50 PM
3

It's too easy for a woman to falsely accuse, deny access to children and then delay matters for as long as possible. The courts don't let you see your children "just in case", while the false claims are investigated. Even if you prove the accusations are false there is no punishment for the woman and the lost time with your children cannot be replaced.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 11:54 AM
-5

Struggling to see the relevance to men's rights
/r/MensRights21/04/25 11:49 AM
41

BELIEVE WOMEN. Well, perhaps not that one
/r/MensRights15/04/25 12:19 PM
1

Why did you flag this post as "progress"? Doesn't seem like progress to me!
/r/MensRights12/04/25 12:48 PM
-45

You're clearly a teenager because 20 years ago it wasn't like that
/r/MensRights11/04/25 11:44 AM
3

How many years did it take her to say this?
/r/MensRights09/04/25 08:02 AM
1

There's a lovely pub near my office in the city. Catches the sun when it comes out. And 95% of the customers are men during office hours. I know where I'd rather be
/r/MensRights03/04/25 07:09 AM
-11

She asked for consent before she did it, I don't see what the problem is
/r/MensRights03/04/25 07:04 AM
1

The focus of the survey is wrong. They are clearly looking for people to say that CMS needs stronger enforcement powers, and this is why nobody uses them. Instead they should be encouraging people to make their own informal arrangements
/r/MensRights02/04/25 12:05 PM
45

The tv show in question is fiction, yet they act like it is true because it suits their agenda
/r/MensRights24/03/25 08:11 AM
9

So now men are to blame for the behaviour of a fictional character lol
/r/MensRights22/03/25 09:58 PM
4

Most of the websites and forums that made up the "manosphere" have been shut down. Perhaps a few survived but the main ones are gone
/r/MensRights22/03/25 08:08 AM
3

When I got divorced in London a few years ago, the judge told me my ex wife was entitled to maintain the lifestyle she enjoyed during the marriage. However this man was told the opposite
/r/MensRights22/03/25 08:05 AM
6

Sounds quite exploitable to me. Couple has two kids, dad starts a business and pays his wife an income to dodge tax
/r/MensRights20/03/25 07:27 AM
3

You clearly didn't read the article because there is no indication the mother lied about anything. They were dating. She had IVF using donor sperm and he was fine with that. Some time later the relationship broke down and now he doesn't want to be a father to these children
/r/MensRights15/03/25 01:57 PM
1

The figures don't make sense though. More women at university but also earning more at ages 16 - 24 (while they are still at university?)
/r/MensRights04/03/25 10:45 AM
16

Good advice for anyone, regardless of gender. Don't make finding someone to sleep with/have a relationship with the centre of your life and your life will get better. Ironically the less you chase them the more they seem to find you. That's been my experience.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 04:16 PM
2

When recruiting for tech roles, I was encouraged not to ask for strong technical skills as this would discourage women from applying :-)
/r/MensRights11/02/25 10:39 AM
1

Queen Victoria
/r/MensRights10/02/25 06:14 PM
4

Child support battles are usually not about spending money on the child, it's about controlling how it is spent. Most men would happily spend the money on their child, and most women do spend child support on the child too. Like most things divorced / separated people fight about - they're fighting each other for dominance and the child is just stuck in the middle.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 12:00 PM
52

My (boomer) mother went to one of the best regarded private schools in the country. Even then her school was renowned for creating women who went on to have senior roles in business and it was an early pioneer for feminist values. My mother dropped out of school at 16. By 21 she was married and by 25 she was a stay at home mother. Talking to her recently, she blames society that she never had a career. Apparently her own decisions have nothing to do with it,
/r/MensRights06/02/25 01:23 PM
16

So much drama in this case, I'll stick to watching men's football from now on. The kiss was wrong but jeez - mountains out of molehills.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 03:39 PM
3

Also all the child soldiers
/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:30 PM
3

Paid for by who I wonder? I suspect most claims will be false with true victims too ashamed to ask for the leave
/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:24 PM
1

For a few years I was "going my own way". I stumbled on to MGTOW reddit looking for discussions about living without women and all I found was people complaining about them.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 11:02 AM
1

Lol whenever someone capitalises their posts liKE tHiS I just think they're an idiot, whichever side of the argument they are on
/r/MensRights06/01/25 10:59 AM
2

Looks like the boomers were right after all
/r/MensRights06/01/25 10:55 AM
2

Who cares what they think?
/r/MensRights31/12/24 02:13 PM
-3

There's nothing wrong with MGTOW as a concept, however the reality of that sub was that it was mostly just guys hating on wpmen. Probably why it got taken down
/r/MensRights21/12/24 09:40 AM
15

I've never seen any self improvement ideas for women that suggested they lose weight
/r/MensRights07/12/24 12:20 PM
2

Men have access to birth control. It may not come in pill form but it works perfectly well. If you choose not to use it that's your mistake
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:59 PM
2

Struggling to see the men's rights angle here. Like you I see no reason for women not to do this if they want.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 01:16 PM
8

I've been falsely accused of domestic violence and also of being an unfit parent. The court process was atrocious and left many scars. The need to bottle up my anger (in case it was used against me) lead to all sorts of mental health issues that are still now being unpacked, after 11 years. However there is life after, if you are open to it. I've found a new partner who is much better than my ex, and been with her for the last 9 years. She's been a huge support to my life. And recently my daught…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 12:14 AM
1

It's ridiculous how each government department has its own definition that most benefits them. On benefits? Defacto as soon as your partner moves in as they can take them away. Want to immigrate? Must wait 12 months to make it harder for you. Family court? Make it as confusing as possible so that everyone needs to lawyer up and argue about whether they are defacto or not.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 11:31 AM
2

This is bad advice. Nobody will believe you, even if it's true. Video evidence will be used against you as evidence of coercive behaviour as it was recorded without consent.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 11:27 AM
9

I find the 1 million figure very hard to believe. I suspect their definition is of "financial abuse" is very wide. I've tried and tried to find the actual survey this is based on, all I managed was a summary: https://survivingeconomicabuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Measuring-economic-abuse-preliminary-findings-Nov-2024.pdf The summary does reveal that the following are considered "financial abuse": * Refusing to pay the agreed share of rent or bills * Punching walls or smashing things * Ref…
/r/MensRights27/11/24 04:35 PM
9

Your wife didn't "make you" break your air pods. She didn't even "make" you get mad. You did both those things yourself. Next time she says stuff you don't like, don't get mad and don't break stuff. Argue back if you want or leave her but do it without anger.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 10:57 AM
67

Nope. Men have been slandered long before the election all over the world
/r/MensRights22/11/24 11:40 AM
2

The figures are probably accurate. All it takes is one incidence in your entire life to get on this list. If a woman dates 20 guys, one slaps her in an argument and the other 19 treat her well, she's still a victim of violence. Even I'm a victim of violence - nothing serious and only happened once a very long ago but still if I was surveyed I would have to answer yes.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 01:11 PM
2

This sub has posts and comments that are just as bad
/r/MensRights15/11/24 01:38 PM
1

Pretty sure the church of Scientology is also involved lol. Wait, didn't hedge funds fake the moon landing? And shoot JFK? It's all connected...
/r/MensRights13/11/24 10:53 AM
4

True, if you disagree with one then you should also disagree with the other
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:30 PM
1

She lives in London and spent £15k. That's nowhere near a house deposit!
/r/MensRights05/11/24 11:25 AM
2

In my experience in the financial sector, there is a lot of talk and visible DEI, but much less substance. For example my company decided to put names and headshots of our senior managers on the website. Initially it was supposed to be all Senior VPs and above however there were too many men and not enough women. So they took some of the men off and included women who were less senior instead. Also they put the women near the top of the page so they were more visible. What the company did NOT do…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 02:05 PM
1

That's not been my experience. The women I've worked for are more concerned about climbing further up the ladder than they are about helping women below them
/r/MensRights04/11/24 01:56 PM
-7

Don't document and report it. You won't be taken seriously and it will only make things worse. This is not the hill to die on
/r/MensRights08/10/24 09:43 AM
2

Their women's initiative turned 25 in 2021 so it must have started around 1996. Which is a long time before you are saying they in decline
/r/MensRights18/09/24 01:13 PM
15

Women love making sweeping generalisations like this but are unable to come up with any specific issues because there are none. The fact is, the world is simply easier for women. I can't think of any specific examples right now, but it must be true because I said so, and all my friends are saying it too /sarcasm
/r/MensRights17/09/24 08:11 AM
1

You're just following the wrong people. Also the more time you spend looking at these posts, the system knows you are looking at it and so tries to show you more of them. I don't get any of this when I'm on X
/r/MensRights10/09/24 09:32 AM
3

I've never seen someone get fired for this. I HAVE seen companies cover for people who harass women, usually when the perpetrator is an important manager. For example in one company there was a guy harassing many of his female staff. Rather than address any of the complaints the company simply transferred the women to another department.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:10 AM
1

Because the child needs it
/r/MensRights07/09/24 08:37 AM
1

Stop worrying about women's standards. Take charge and set your own: Woman make more than man? At least she's not after my money Woman 5'7 and man 5'10? I must be amazing since average difference is 5 inches. Woman graduate degree and man bachelors? Who cares what degree she has as long as she's hot? Woman dating down in terms of family wealth? At least she's not after my money Woman pays for date? Perhaps this one's a keeper Split the bill? Perhaps this one's a keeper Woman younger than man? Sh…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 01:47 PM
11

Never be ashamed of your masculinity. There's nothing "toxic" about being a man.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 08:38 AM
2

I have two children - one lives with me and one lives with my ex. Despite this, I still need to pay her about 15% of my after tax income in child support every month, because my income is higher than hers
/r/MensRights28/08/24 08:44 AM
1

Yes, I can read. Can YOU? I even mentioned your 61% statistic
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:13 PM
19

As well as being a man you are rich (compared to them), white and potentially a US passport. I'm not convinced that these nations treat their own men as well as they treated you.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 08:21 AM
-31

Struggling to see the men's rights angle here... you're just hating on feminists and women in general (well 61% of them)
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:55 AM
1

They're right though. Most MGTOW never shut up about it - so much that I don't believe them either
/r/MensRights24/08/24 06:13 PM
1

/r/MensRights02/08/24 09:49 AM
4

You really watched this? 54 minutes long lol
/r/MensRights01/08/24 03:56 PM
8

Well eventually the sun is going to blow up and kill us all, but there's plenty of fun to be had before then
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:13 AM
3

And these women wonder why they only attract losers 😀
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:10 AM
1

Stop analysing the situation, just go and talk to her
/r/MensRights14/07/24 05:43 PM
5

Everybody says this stuff because it's the right thing to say, and you will get ostracized or fired if you argue against it. But very few people really believe it.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 10:34 AM
1

Just smile confidently and say "No"
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:12 PM
1

And yet even you seem to believe the site as you say a guy "legitimately" had a family, leukemia and a side girl. Perhaps this isn't true? Point I'm making is don't do it! Nothing to gain and potentially a lot to lose
/r/MensRights12/07/24 10:19 AM
5

I would advise stop giving her control over your wages and then she can't do anything
/r/MensRights11/07/24 09:17 AM
3

Study from 2019 that proves what you are saying https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-acquisition/how-women-find-jobs-gender-report
/r/MensRights11/07/24 09:12 AM
4

I don't accept that it is women's "fault" that men commit suicide. Just like it's not men's fault when women do it.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 11:37 AM
4

Because behind every great man there is an even greater woman who made him what he was. And these women deserve the credit dammit! /sarcastic
/r/MensRights10/07/24 10:49 AM
0

Because the men have more money than them
/r/MensRights10/07/24 08:48 AM
2

I prefer it when they hide behind a facade! Worse is when they put all those annoying emotions on display :-)
/r/MensRights08/07/24 03:37 PM
0

If the fight is killing you (OP says "sentenced to death") then it's not worth it. Or at least not continuing to fight in the same way. Give up on the court system because that's not working. Get your life together. Reach out to your children when they're older and the courts have no power any more. There are other ways to approach this.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 01:37 PM
-3

You need to stop fighting battles you know you will never win. Sometimes you just need to accept you lost and move on. Yes it sucks and yes the system is unfair. But there's nothing to be gained by continuing to fight a losing battle. You have the rest of your life so get out there and live it.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 09:25 AM
4

Another well read, intelligent man here. I think this is a bad idea and don't support it.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:46 PM
-2

Apart from the crossing the road thing I don't mind the rest of the poster
/r/MensRights17/06/24 11:33 AM
7

The writer just can't bring herself to say that women are now advantaged when applying for jobs because companies are all trying to hit diversity targets. Especially for more senior roles. The obvious fact behind these statistics is that there are less women in the job market when it comes to high paying roles. Maybe 20% of the candidates are women yet we're trying to have them make up 50% of our senior managers
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:49 PM
16

In any article, anywhere, about people being romantically scammed, the victims are always women. As if women haven't been scamming men like this since the dawn of time
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:10 AM
2

This. No need to live with a girl anyway, much more fun having a bachelor pad :-)
/r/MensRights09/06/24 09:06 AM
15

I've had a few that just hang around, always watching you and hoping that you will speak to them. There's a girl in my office like this now. Always sits next to me in meetings, ALWAYS looking at me, always lingering around but hardly ever initiating a conversation. Gets a bit creepy after a while but I just ignore it
/r/MensRights09/06/24 09:03 AM
23

The problem here is just different definitions of the word "nice". If we substituted it and said we want someone who treats us fairly, is compassionate and considerate then we'd probably all agree
/r/MensRights09/06/24 08:59 AM
4

The problem with these studies is that they read the data the wrong way. E.g. Getting married does not make men wealthier. It's the other way around. Wealthy men are more likely to he married because women won't marry broke men.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 12:02 PM
-4

Because it's in the best interest of the child (who is always innocent in this situation) that men don't walk away. In every single study, it's shown that children whose fathers have abandoned them are worse off. Just don't do it.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 10:14 AM
38

A woman never starts her post with, "I respect all men but..." She can just say what she wants without being villainized
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:03 AM
6

Here's some useful data from the Australian Institute of Criminology: “Sixty-nine per cent of homicide victims in 2022–23 were male, with a homicide victimisation rate of 7.65 per 100,000 for Indigenous males compared with 1.04 per 100,000 for non-Indigenous males. The homicide victimisation rate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander females was 3.07 per 100,000, compared with 0.45 per 100,000 for non-Indigenous females. In 2022‒23, 16% of homicide incidents were intimate partner homicides (…
/r/MensRights30/05/24 08:15 AM
3

Presumably this woman will have been "trapped in an abusive relationship" and therefore is not to blame.... yeah, right
/r/MensRights30/05/24 08:03 AM
10

Same approach I took. Just bluntly said "I think this" or "I am doing this" and then that's the end of the conversation. I would never let myself be exiled to the couch - though she was welcome to sleep there whenever she wanted :-) I'm using past tense because it's sooo much better now that I've divorced her and found someone that doesn't behave like that.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 08:00 AM
1

The court has no power to stop someone moving house in UK
/r/MensRights22/05/24 07:30 AM
4

In UK they are trying to make the pension ages the same and their is massive protest from women in the country. Apparently it's sexist for women to have the same rights as men.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:37 PM
5

Interesting article but nothing to do with men's rights
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:33 PM
1

Pretty sure her "potatoes" are not home grown
/r/MensRights17/05/24 07:17 AM
1

Not hiring a lawyer has probably cost you more than hiring one would have
/r/MensRights14/05/24 04:18 PM
2

Considering the location and time of day the people in the shopping mall were probably 80% women anyway...
/r/MensRights14/05/24 04:07 PM
4

Agree this is rubbish. Ideally child support & alimony are tax deductible for the payer, and taxable income for the recipient. In UK, child support is a % of gross income. If you're in a high tax bracket and paying support for 3 kids, you pay 45 + 8 = 53% in tax plus 19% child support for marginal tax rate of 72% I suspect if someone was paying support for multiple kids and multiple mothers you could contrive a situation where the total bill was over 100% of income!
/r/MensRights14/05/24 04:06 PM
7

It's most likely about his anti-Israel stance
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:52 PM
38

"In college and community samples, rates of self-reported rape perpetration range from 6% to 15%, and rates of sexual assault perpetration range from 22% to 57% (Abbey et al., 1998; Calhoun, Bernat, Clum, & Frame, 1997; Koss et al., 1987; Muehlenhard & Linton, 1987; Rapaport & Burkhart, 1984; Senn, Desmarais, Verberg, & Wood, 2000)." Self-reported studies are generally rubbish as people who care about an issue are far more likely to respond than people who don't care All of the studies are over …
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:30 AM
3

I refuse to accept blame for stuff I didn't do.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 05:02 PM
-16

That's terrible grammar. Don't say that. And no-one should ever say "y'all".
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:00 AM
2

I'd respond by saying that 78% of statistics are made up
/r/MensRights03/05/24 05:26 PM
1

The average gold miner is 42 and male. But the average gold digger is 24 and female.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:53 AM
14

What I never understood is why women who expect men to drive the conversation are on Bumble. They should be using one of the other apps that is more suitable to what they want
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:58 PM
46

It's always hard to find a good base player for the band
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:37 AM
3

Actions speak louder than words. I've never actually SEEN a woman with a bear. :-)
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:06 AM
3

Prime ministers should be fixing things, not joining protest marches. Who is he protesting against?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:05 AM
1

I call bullshit on this post. We don't go to "college" in UK, we go to university. Child support does not go through the courts, its a separate government body. Yes they are slow but that's incompetence, not conspiracy.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:02 AM
5

Don't waste your time arguing with idiots
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:53 AM
1

Probably. It's time for Sadiq to go, I hate the LTN's he's put everywhere
/r/MensRights25/04/24 07:21 AM
7

The mushroom woman is also locked up despite not having had a trial yet.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 07:19 AM
1

Because they're mostly just seeking attention
/r/MensRights22/04/24 08:59 AM
3

If you've got the kids then it doesn't really matter if she has a restraining order against you. I'm sure you have no desire to go near her anyway! I guess what I'm saying is focus on the issues that matter and don't worry about the rest.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 06:04 PM
2

Correlation does not mean causation. It could just mean that single women don't want to admit they are unhappy while single men are more open about it. Or potentially that women won't date unhappy men while men are more open to dating unhappy women
/r/MensRights20/04/24 09:56 AM
5

Society was always about having relationships with people that tick all the boxes. "Falling in love and getting married" only exists in the movies
/r/MensRights19/04/24 01:25 PM
1

Good point, I forgot about that. Though potentially someone could agree to a final order, wait until they receive their money and then claim they agreed to it in error.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 12:58 PM
2

We all think it. We just don't say it in case we get fired
/r/MensRights18/04/24 08:39 AM
3

While the story is funny, I'm glad a precedent has not been set. Otherwise I expect we would see a string of "clerical errors" to try and screw men out of even more money after they have agreed to what was supposed to be a final settlement
/r/MensRights17/04/24 09:59 AM
1

How much do you actually know about the law in Australia? Very few people there use the word "attorney" - they're called "lawyers", or possibly "scumbags" depending on whose side they're on :-)
/r/MensRights15/04/24 03:39 PM
3

Yes, I've had landlords say they won't rent their property to a group of young men. Never had a problem as an older man though.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:33 AM
1

Just teach men that there is more to life than dating and the rest of your points don't matter
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:39 AM
5

I pay alimony to my ex wife because I earn more than her, even though our daughter lives with me. Just another example that it's all about giving money to the woman and that the children are incidental to this
/r/MensRights02/04/24 09:39 AM
1

You might have but you're forcing that choice on your children. No problem if you want to live off grid on your own - if it makes you happy then do it. But to force two surrogate children into that situation is cruel.
/r/MensRights28/03/24 09:56 AM
2

Did any of you even read the article? There is no ex boyfriend, she just made up a name of a person who doesn't exist. So yes, she wasted police time but didn't falsely accuse anyone of anything, unless you consider imaginary friends to be real people
/r/MensRights19/03/24 10:18 AM
2

Pretty crappy life for your kids in that scenario - living off grid with just you and no-one else.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 10:18 AM
1

You're not "forced" to comply with these standards! I don't and have never had a problem finding dates or girlfriends. The problem is that men THINK that if they do all these things then they will get a girlfriend at the end of it but it doesn't work that way. You're better off ignoring dating culture and making yourself desirable to women. Then they will forget all their rules and come chasing after you.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 09:30 AM
-2

I know loads of right wing people who are misandrist. And lots of left wing people who are not. You're just plain wrong.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 09:55 AM
4

Accusing a man of inappropriate behaviour is the go to strategy for women in trouble about anything. Even if he was inappropriate (he probably wasn't), how is that an excuse for not paying back a £375k business loan.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 02:26 PM
3

I know so many men under control of their wives. Lacking in courage and afraid to leave. Working hard to earn money and buy the things she wants. Needing to ask permission every time they to go out. You're right, this law will never be used to help them.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 12:18 PM
1

For me this is a great red flag detector. First date is usually a pub or cafe (nothing fancy), I buy the first drink and wait to see if they reciprocate. If not I politely make an excuse and end the date. Any attempt to shift the first date to something expensive is also a hard next.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 12:12 PM
1

There is nothing gender neutral about a country that has male only conscription. I'll stay where I am thanks
/r/MensRights09/03/24 12:01 PM
3

I really want to go in to the lion cage at the zoo and pet them. Everyone is telling me don't do it because it's dangerous but they're sooo cute! How do I do this safely?
/r/MensRights09/03/24 11:57 AM
2

He needs to go to the police. If they don't believe him he just needs to leave on his own. He's no good to his kids if he's dead
/r/MensRights09/03/24 11:55 AM
1

Queen Victoria was one of the most aggressively imperialistic leaders in history - and she's widely celebrated as a hero for it.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 11:52 AM
4

The problem with a global report is that it lumps together countries like Iran and Afghanistan, where women face legal persecution, with the rest of the world which discriminates in favour of them. And then tries to argue that e.g. because women in Afghanistan can't go to school we need more women running fortune 500 companies in America so somehow balance things out
/r/MensRights09/03/24 11:50 AM
36

To answer your question "why": 1. Because they want to get published 2. Because they want funding 3. Because they want people to click on their links - including outraged people like us 4. Because they want show the world they are on the "right" side of this argument. Basically lots of reasons that have nothing to do with science :-)
/r/MensRights09/03/24 11:42 AM
1

It says quite clearly in the article that they are not going to pursue the charges
/r/MensRights08/03/24 04:16 PM
3

In a past job i was required to tell recruiters: We are a diverse company so can you please send me a diverse set of CVs. Everyone knows what that really means.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 11:22 AM
3

Also most people only use them when they are free and switch platforms rather than pay
/r/MensRights06/03/24 09:00 AM
89

Here's some relationship advice: Don't seek relationship advice from anonymous people on the Internet
/r/MensRights03/03/24 11:32 AM
2

Yeah but I find 80% of women unattractive too. What does that mean?
/r/MensRights01/03/24 10:25 AM
2

Most of the women I know are very right wing. I don't think gender is a significant factor
/r/MensRights23/02/24 01:30 PM
1

Or the "who gets to live with the kids after divorce" gap which stands at about 20 to 1 in the woman's favour
/r/MensRights23/02/24 01:25 PM
7

If you want to show anger, just do it. Who cares what they think
/r/MensRights20/02/24 12:26 PM
0

This is not a men's rights issue. It's a women's rights issue
/r/MensRights19/02/24 10:46 AM
18

Why should the mother get to decide how the father's money is spent? She knew she could not afford the school but enrolled the child anyway. Unless the father had agreed to pay the fees she should not have enrolled in the school. Simple as that. Non-response should not be assumed as agreement.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 09:08 AM
43

Sadly, this is how it usually is in the family courts. My ex decided it would be best if she stopped stop working and became a full time mum. The courts decided I would have to pay for it. Both the courts and ex wives just love spending the man's money.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 09:04 AM
2

You're wrong and rahsoft is right. There is nothing in this law that targets men. It would equally apply to the thousands of nurses who are trying to bring their husbands into the UK with them. Also in the case of a UK man unable to bring his Thai wife to the UK I would argue the wife stuck in Thailand is the bigger loser from this law.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 03:00 PM
12

Every time you get laid shout "Woo!" at the end
/r/MensRights12/02/24 10:18 AM
-1

Agree that redpill and MGTOW threads detract from the "rights" we are trying to discuss and change. However since redpill and similar subs got shut down there's nowhere else for these people to go. Perhaps a suitable flair could give these people space in our sub.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 10:41 AM
1

Generally it's the older single women that get most outraged, because someone that should be pursuing and marrying them is instead dating a 19 old.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 10:22 AM
5

Clearly the relationship is over. Accept this and don't make things worse trying to save a failed relationship. Think about what you want from the future in regards to financial settlement and access to your children. I'd also suggest filing for divorce. It's generally better to be the one who asks for divorce because you get some control over the speed of the case.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:35 AM
2

It depends where on reddit you go. Subs like Relationships and AITA are mostly women and will be biased accordingly. Subs like this one and other male dominated Subs Will generally be biased towards men. And the vast majority of reddit doesn't care either way
/r/MensRights07/02/24 06:07 PM
1

She's clearly ranting about something , but hard to figure out exactly what.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 05:02 PM
1

I've been battling my ex-wife for years over access to children. I live in UK and can't provide much in the way of legal advice, but I have a lot of general advice that served me well over the years. Your emotions are running high right now and if you're not careful you will do or say something you later come to regret. Take your time and think carefully before saying or doing anything. Minimise communication with your ex and if you need to ask her something do it via email. Be brief, polite and…
/r/MensRights05/02/24 10:38 AM
-7

You've literally read THOUSANDS of these stories? You need to get out more!
/r/MensRights30/01/24 11:26 AM
5

The vast majority of men don't want a synthetic companion. Very little will change.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 02:31 PM
1

Sorry you didn't get nominated barbie, Ken beach you
/r/MensRights28/01/24 12:28 AM
6

Yes, better to have all those people sleeping on the street outside the school instead /s
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:25 AM
-11

Is there a link to the main story anywhere, how do I know this is a real case? All i see is 3 guys talking about a scenario which could be hypothetical
/r/MensRights15/01/24 08:16 AM
1

It's not a transfer from the subordinate parent to the dominant parent. It's a transfer from the man to the woman. Even if the dominant parent is the man they're still generally the ones paying
/r/MensRights13/01/24 10:45 AM
1

I know loads of old people that live happily without having ever used social media - you can too!
/r/MensRights11/01/24 09:39 AM
2

Don't worry about what society thinks or says. They're telling you to do what's best for them, not what's best for you. Women will tell you to be the type of man they want right now (chad or doormat). You need to figure out what type of man you want to be, and become that. Best advice I ever got was to think about where you want to be 10 years from now - what sort of life you will have. Stay focused on that and start making small changes that take you towards that goal.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 09:38 AM
1

swipe left
/r/MensRights11/01/24 09:25 AM
1

I've been dealing with CMS for the last 10 years and have an open case with them now. I can confirm they are a shambolic organisation who frequently gets it wrong. Like the people in the youtube, I had a one-off income boost that was incorrectly projected forward even though the it was only one-off.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 10:13 AM
1

You can escape them by leaving the country. Of course this means leaving your kids behind as well
/r/MensRights08/01/24 10:09 AM
3

"I still care for her" Just STOP. She's an adult and can look after herself. Not your responsibility. Move on.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 09:58 AM
2

It's possible but the odds are definitely against you. Before starting I would ask myself whether it was worth the risk vs just cutting them out of your life and moving on.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 09:56 AM
2

Dating has always been like this. In some ways it was even worse pre-internet as the rejection and shaming was done to your face instead of virtually. You can't block someone who's standing right in front of you!
/r/MensRights08/01/24 09:54 AM
2

It already is. Google "NBA child support" and you'll find dozens of stories of sports stars paying ludicrous sums of money to support kids the probably hardly ever get to see.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 09:32 AM
6

Your sample size of 4 is not representative of the wider community. In general women do want to have children. That's why they get so desperate when they're in their mid thirties and haven't found a partner yet.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 10:19 AM
0

There are places, just not on reddit
/r/MensRights03/01/24 10:13 AM
4

No they don't, your numbers are way too high. Did you know that 75% of statistics on the Internet are made up?
/r/MensRights01/01/24 12:20 PM
44

I liked it. Not because of the message, because it was funny. The kens totally stole the show and I enjoyed watching the kens horsing aroind while the barbies said boring stuff about the supreme Court and the constitution.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 12:15 PM
2

I navigate to this sub by searching "reddit mens rights" on Google. Often the top few posts are anti-MRA reddit posts from 5+ years ago rather than this sub. Why is that? Who knows. I'm sure very few people are reading them after so long.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 10:37 AM
1

Stop feeding the troll :-)
/r/MensRights28/12/23 10:33 AM
7

Accusing a man of gender bias is the go-to tactic of a certain type of ambitious or vindictive woman. Unfortunately there's not much you can do about it. I wouldn't recommend involving HR as that will be all women too and they're not on your side. If I were in your situation, I'd tell my boss that without specific examples there is nothing I can do to address them so perhaps she can come back when the other parties are open to discussing things. And then I would start looking for another job.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 10:26 AM
34

Did they? Funny how everything kept working fine without them :-)
/r/MensRights26/12/23 11:33 AM
22

Put all of these bad people out of your life and start improving your own life without them. It's a tough world out there few people care and you need to be able to look after your self
/r/MensRights25/12/23 01:34 PM
0

At 24 you can get girls without needing to provide. In fact you'll get better ones if they're in to you for other reasons. Lift weights, eat well, dress well, be confident, have good chat and you'll have them chasing after you
/r/MensRights25/12/23 01:30 PM
1

It always makes me laugh when I look at the website of a top tier consulting firm or bank. Every page is filled with young, fashionable, "diverse" people. There's no way all those people actually work there. I work in the industry and can categorically say it's still mostly old, male and white (except for IT which is Indian)
/r/MensRights23/12/23 01:53 PM
-5

They are two different pieces of software. AI is an unbiased piece of software that would say things that are factually true but politically incorrect. So they wrote another piece of software to intercept anything that is politically incorrect and replace it with the banal response received by OP
/r/MensRights22/12/23 04:35 PM
-14

The AI is not biased. OpenAI stick a sensitivity filter between the AI and the output to make sure the AI doesn't say something inappropriate. The filter has been purposely set to stop specific types of content from being returned. Presumably this filter has been only set to filter female images rather than male ones.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 01:48 PM
1

So no matter what you searched, you got women tiktoks. Seems like the algorithm knows what type of content you like! I just did a search and all I got was cats
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:26 AM
0

What's the definition of a man in Washington? What if I date someone from Washington who leaves me and moves back there, can she apply under this law?
/r/MensRights20/12/23 04:15 PM
12

Heh, provided she has mostly male military, police and fire services protecting her. And mostly male tradespeople to build things for her and male taxpayers to subsidise her ... and so on
/r/MensRights16/12/23 08:39 AM
3

"No they're not * 100 no comebacks!" My 6 year old uses this all the time and it seems to work against stupid people
/r/MensRights16/12/23 08:35 AM
15

She can probably justify it legally by saying she's reviewing that white male hires are definitely the best candidate for the job and weren't selected due to unconscious bias. I'm sure she's not actually doing that but she can find a way to justify it legally.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 09:32 AM
2

I live in London, divorce capital of the world. She got about 90% of the assets too. We were only married 6 years. I did consider emigrating but ultimately decided to stay near my children. I'm a high earner, and at the time of separation the kids were little and my ex was off work. She told the judge she wanted to be a stay at home mother and the judge decided I needed to fund that decision. When my lawyer told the judge this was unfair the judge said "He's clearly a capable man. I see men like…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 10:23 AM
62

I know loads of men who want to leave unhappy marriages. However they don't, because they don't want to lose their home and regular access to their children. Women don't have to worry about this - if they divorce the husband moves out and the rest of their life continues as before. However if the husband chooses to divorce he loses everything
/r/MensRights13/12/23 02:38 PM
2

Point #1 isn't true in practice. Women who breastfeed look down on those who don't. When they say it's OK not to breastfeed they don't really mean it
/r/MensRights06/12/23 01:36 PM
4

If you drop out then people will listen to you even less. e.g. who cares about homeless, people, hermits, ..etc. These people are invisible in society and nobody cares about their opinion
/r/MensRights04/12/23 10:08 AM
8

"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife. However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families that he is considered as the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters." Jane Austin, 1813.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 02:55 PM
3

I second this. Also Reddit is mostly US and the laws are very different between countries. As someone who has been through the UK legal system, the main advice I would give is to separate the personal issues from the legal ones as they have nothing to do with each other. Just accept she's a b*tch, it was a mistake to date her but thankfully she's out of your life now. Cut all contact with her and move on with your life. The legal stuff will happen but don't let that be an excuse to talk to your …
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:10 AM
1

True, in both cases one gender is telling the other what they do and don't like.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:01 AM
2

I dunno, I think once people become old and unattractive society stops caring about them regardless of their gender. Say their were two rich 70 year olds, one male and the other female I don't think the woman would get treated any better than the man.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:00 AM
1

Best laugh I've had in a long time
/r/MensRights09/11/23 08:13 AM
-18

To be fair the men were sleeping around too, as the "invaders" or with prostitutes
/r/MensRights08/11/23 10:47 AM
2

Unfortunately the terms of the contract are never actually written down making it virtually impossible to understand what you're getting in to. You think you're vowing to love someone until one of you dies but you're really vowing to support them financially until one of you dies.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 10:24 AM
1

You don't because the child is innocent. However you can refute the suggestion that the only way to support a child is to pay money to the mother. As someone who pays child support, I don't care about the money. What I want is control over how it is spent. I also want my children to know it came from me.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 11:44 AM
16

A very sympathetic article, and no mention at all of the toll this probably took on the father who had his child kidnapped
/r/MensRights03/11/23 08:25 AM
5

Most of the Gen X women I know are doing well. They "have it all" - careers, kids and husbands, though I'm not sure how happy it has made them. Many complain of being tired of all the responsibilities, and seem to be constantly pushing themselves in competition with each orher. But perhaps it was always like that.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 02:34 PM
0

It's definitely worse but I wouldn't blame feminism - the anonymity of it encourages bad behaviour on all sides. Also in regards to others comments about women's standards they have been this way long before online dating even existed.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 01:32 PM
8

Realistically everyone will get a worse quality of life because expenses are going up when the parents no longer love together. In most western countries the burden of that falls mostly on the man while the woman and children are protected.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:48 AM
8

Imagine applying for a job and telling the employer they must pay you £xxx because otherwise you and your children need to maintain their current standard of living
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:45 AM
11

I've been through a similar situation to you. The harsh reality is that at every step of the way the system is biased against you. You need to accept that and have a plan to get through it. My story... My ex and I agreed our relationship was over, and were both demanding the other leave the house. My ex made a false complaint of domestic violence, the police came said that even though there was no evidence of violence, I was arrested "just in case". Then my ex applied for a restraining order (ca…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 09:43 AM
1

Thanks for all the downvotes but can someone please show me where the article says it's mens fault? Of course you can't because it doesn't say that. You lot are as bad as the feminists seeing discrimination where there is none
/r/MensRights28/10/23 10:08 AM
9

All generative AI has it's answers passed through a sensitivity filter to make sure it doesn't accidentally say something offensive. Presumably that includes the example you mentioned above
/r/MensRights28/10/23 10:05 AM
9

I've been approached by women many times, though generally it's by women I'm not interested in dating
/r/MensRights28/10/23 10:02 AM
3

You don't "have" to do anything if you don't want to
/r/MensRights28/10/23 10:00 AM
-19

I can't see the bit where she says it's mens fault
/r/MensRights27/10/23 04:39 PM
0

The thing i don't get about MGTOW's is why they talk about women so much
/r/MensRights22/10/23 12:04 PM
4

If you read the article to the end you'd discover she actually blames herself for being too picky
/r/MensRights22/10/23 11:59 AM
1

Approx 80% of people with autism are male. Fact. Yet whenever a media outlet writes an article about people with autism the picture / main subject of the story is almost always a woman.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:33 PM
3

I've been through a similar experience in the UK family court. There's too much to say for reddit, key advice from me would be to mask your anger and take a long term view. Lose your temper once and you're a potentially dangerous man, and this will not be forgotten. The system is not fair and you just have to accept that's how it is and make the best of it. Also while 50/50 access is ideal, you can still build a great relationship with your kids without that. I got about the same access as you h…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 11:48 AM
1

"I'm no incel, just ask ur mom " /sarcasm
/r/MensRights17/10/23 11:40 AM
2

The mistake you made was listening to feminists. You are doing this because you care about female approval too much. Just disengage from them and get back to enjoying your life
/r/MensRights17/10/23 11:28 AM
21

Women have always been angry. Just ask any man that has a wife. That's why men have evolved selective hearing :-)
/r/MensRights16/10/23 09:39 AM
4

You're right on both points. Most large companies have diversity targets and in many countries are required to report on this every year. I have two practical strategies to get around this: 1. Become a contract worker rather than a permanent staff. In IT you can get very good day rates as a contract worker if you have a strong CV. Contract workers are usually not counted in diversity stats and companies are more willing to hire white or Indian men into these roles. Apply to start-ups and small c…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 08:26 AM
3

Nope. I've known a lot of liberal feminist and sexually liberated women in that age bracket. Not one of them ever changed into an anti-feminist Christian conservative. One of three things happened: They managed to marry a beta male and are now convinced this is due to their liberal feminist views attracting the "right" sort of men. They are bitter and single - and blame this on men for not being able to handle a "strong" woman They are became happy liberal feminist and sexually liberated women i…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 02:38 PM
1

I agree it's suspicious. Very few people will pay 600 dollars just to make a political point. Also, the conference organisers gladly took these people's money so do they really care?
/r/MensRights05/10/23 01:00 PM
-3

At least half of the regular posters in this sub are misogynists. Pretty much every thread gets hijacked by them and ends up being a whinge about feminism and women in general. You can argue back, but by then the point of your original post is lost.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:37 PM
1

Women approach me quite often - so at least some of them are able to :-)
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:46 PM
1

If you feel like that then you're dating the wrong women. There are good ones out there. Also what makes you think escorts are somehow safer than other women?
/r/MensRights28/09/23 04:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter