| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | A Case Against "Only Texting for Logistics"Not sure how else to explain it but I guess a convo that hasn’t “ended.” Throughout a convo you could go through various topics of course but but the initial back & forth continues without either person not responding, essentially ending the convo. Say for instance, you stop responding to person (on a high note or just bc), maybe a week passes by and you see something relevant to them or something that might make them laugh and so u send them a pic or whatever. That’s what I mean by a sporadic t… | /r/seduction | 19/01/22 10:36 PM |
| – | A Case Against "Only Texting for Logistics"Appreciate the response man. Definitely need to work on this more. Tend to ask questions more than I should w/o thinking of the emotions to provoke. Do you tend to have continuous text convos or do you prefer sporadic texts? I’m asking in reference to times you’d share pics or Spotify songs u mentioned. Most of mine of continuous and I feel I should start a different approach | /r/seduction | 19/01/22 08:55 PM |
| – | A Case Against "Only Texting for Logistics"How sorts of statements do you refer to? Like out of the blue stuff? | /r/seduction | 18/01/22 04:08 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter