TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SamsIphone Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by SamsIphone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Generally studies like that find those results to be from women reacting badly to command structures, which are essential to how those jobs function.
/r/PussyPass21/04/16 02:40 AM
1

You are absolutely right, it was a massive over exaggeration. However it is a significant part of why those places exist. If you are not willing to expect that sort of behavior when you go somewhere like that then you have misjudged the type of place you are going.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 07:38 AM
1

This is exactly what I came here to say. You go to a bar/club to hook up. You go to a pub to drink. There are classy pubs, so the argument of "I just don't like the pub environment", pretty much means you are just looking to hook up.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 12:20 AM
1

This is funny.. Not because it is sexist but just because of how stupid they all are. This does not really belong on this sub, but it is pretty funny non-the-less.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:04 AM
3

It comes from the fact that if you ever had to recreate a society it would be possible for one man to father children to a large number of children to various women simultaneously, where as only having one woman and lots of men will severely limit the chance of survival of the new society. Obviously all the children having one father is terrible for the gene pool, but it is possible. Clearly today this is not an issue, but that is the root of the phrase. It was meant to be used in emergencies, i…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 01:57 AM
1

I am not arguing that urinals are less efficient, they barely more efficient in that you do not have to press the button, but with something like this I would prefer comfort and privacy over efficiency.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:06 PM
0

The burden of proof is on the person making the existance statement. ie "I own a car, now prove that I do not own a car" would be putting the burden of proof on the wrong party.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:33 PM
2

To be honest most guys I have ever seen in public rest rooms would rather queue for a cubicle than use the urinal. The only reason for there to be a urinal is limited space.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:23 PM
1

Easily intimidated. Being 'intimidating' would imply that they would be scared.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 03:51 AM
3

Slutwalk should never have started. They need to grow the fuck up and realize that if you paint a target on your back your more likely to get shot.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:19 AM
2

I remember seeing something here not long ago with evidence that the majority of domestic abuse is actually female-to-male. Unfortunately I do not have the link to it, but I will try and find it for you.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 04:06 AM
1

Unfriend...
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:58 AM
0

Did you tell them that this was the reason you stopped sponsoring?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:06 AM
1

OBVIOUS troll.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:55 AM
3

Previously marriages were at the discretion of the parents with little to no input from the person being married. The idea being the family will join in a situation most likely to provided a family with a more stable environment and to be honest it actually worked. Look at how many marriages and families break up now. I come from a broken family so I am trying to take the high ground or anything here, it is just how it is.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:15 AM
3

I never said it did. However It's also a means of connecting two families of similar economic background. This statement does actually make sense. Although it is generally for the betterment of both families rather than because they have the same economic background. However it is obviously less important now since wars are fought by governments rather than families. Hence the increase in prevalence of love as a basis for marriage.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:31 AM
5

Love as a basis for marriage is only a relatively new concept.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:20 AM
0

How could an anarchist support feminism? They are essentially polar opposites.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:13 PM
2

As long as they are doing it for themselves and not to just stick it in other peoples faces then sure, why not?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:14 PM
2

This isn't a bad idea, except the card would have to deny cash withdrawals
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:02 AM
7

In this case for a good reason...
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:01 AM
1

Credit union
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:26 AM
5

I honestly still don't get it sorry.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 09:08 PM
0

Have to admit, I thought Asian as well.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:00 PM
-4

Lying on the internet?
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:14 AM
8

I always wondered this. If we just started periodically assassinating judges that made decisions like this I'm pretty sure they would get the message almost immediately.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:29 AM
13

Violence against women was never "Okay"... It was just swept under the rug. Violence against men has always been acceptable, and is in 'modern' times become comedy material because "Women shouldn't be able to beat up men hahahahahaha".
/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:26 AM
11

If its ok to discriminate on the basis of sex then why not race? You might be more comfortable around a man if you're a man because you think they wont be sexually attracted to you, regardless of whether that is true or not. I might be more comfortable not living with a black person because I don't wont a flatmate that is going to steal my possessions. For the record I'm not racist, and I don't believe black people will steal my possessions, the point I'm trying to make is just because you belie…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:17 PM
12

Assuming you actually know this person, I hope you sent those pictures to the owner of the car.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 10:43 PM
2

That article is almost a year old...
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:42 AM
1

This has already been posted several times. Unlike the rest of reddit this sub generally isn't that interested in reposts.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:28 AM
44

My girlfriends mum. Signs up to a dating site. Get messages from several guys, "Eww why are all these creeps messaging me". Suddenly more attractive guy send her message saying "Hey babes lets meet up". What she says to us? "Oh he seems nice. I'll message him back". Seriously. That is how fucked up it is.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:21 AM
6

Troll, please go.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 09:43 AM
6

Also for the record I'm assuming you're from the US, but what state are you in? Some states have crimanlized cross border abduction by the mother, in which case if she ever takes the child over state borders without your knowledge you can file a legal proceeding.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:21 AM
15

This si why I recommend you talk to a lawyer. What I told you was partially viable but as you found out you may need a court order etc. Much better to talk to a lawyer about this.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:16 AM
10

You would think that it wouldn't but actually in most cases it counts in her favor due to the children being kept in the same environment is considered a key factor in custody decisions. However if you get it notarized that she refused you access to your children and that you continually made efforts to see them then it will count in your favor. When I say make efforts I mean requesting that they spend time with you or come to some event with you, even if it is just going out to grandmas for lun…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 01:19 AM
52

Lawyer up, now. Also document the fact that she took you your daughter and refused you access and get it notarized. Edit: If you can not afford to talk to a lawyer at the moment, mention the term Parental child abduction to your wife. About 30 seconds on the internet should be enough to let her know that what shes doing is in fact illegal in most of the civilized world.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:41 AM
1

So to you the problem is that society views some choices in a negative light? Do you also believe that all drugs should be legalized because people choose to take them?
/r/MensRights11/06/12 10:09 AM
1

I do actually agree with you in a way, sort of. Just for arguments sake though if a man and a woman are both into very fierce BDSM, to the extent that one party ends up covered inn bruises or welts etc? Do you think that society should be ok with that? Even though is pretty widely accepted that beating the shit out of anyone is unacceptable behavior ever? I know these two things don't seem so similar, but indulge me.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 09:54 AM
2

Two interesting Acronyms I'd never heard before now PUA - Pick up artist MGTOW - Men going their own way
/r/MensRights10/06/12 11:20 AM
1

Personally I don't see the problem with slut shaming. If you choose to be a slut then you can be ridiculed for it. Just like if you dye your hair pink and put it up in spikes on your head, its a choice therefore I see no reason I can't ridicule you for it.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 11:04 AM
4

Get creative. Possibly reckless endangerment by the court for publishing his name, and creating a hostile living environment causing him to have to relocate.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 09:15 AM
19

The point is that it's a joke... One guy gives it to the groom at a stag party etc, but $500 seems excessive. So maybe only at celebrity stag parties.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 08:38 AM
7

That wouldn't necessarily help. Just because you don't want to get a one off pregnant doesn't mean you never want to have kids.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:51 AM
1

My dad payed WAY over that per month to my mother.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:50 AM
2

You don't seem to understand how suing the state works...
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:04 AM
6

In that case it was continually the father vs the mother. If he can show that the state/country/etc. law has failed to provide a fair result then the will be forced to change the law/the way the law is applied. If possible push for a trial by jury, as in that case its more about how the public views the case, which for this guys case I would assume would be extreme outrage. Obviously getting media coverage to make it a big deal would help greatly.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:14 AM
76

Sue the state.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 09:18 PM
4

Take that to the University Vice-Chancellor.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 08:05 AM
2

Try to use this against her then. When it doesn't work get your lawyer to talk to the papers about discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 08:03 AM
1

Are you by any chance a first year university student? Just taken PHIL101? Or FEM101?
/r/MensRights03/06/12 07:20 AM
6

I have no hatred for cops at all. In fact I respect the profession greatly. The reddit mentality that cops are just there to make your life suck is ridiculous and just shows how the level of maturity across the board seems to have dropped to around the age of 13
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:42 PM
3

Feminist Psychology puts a strong emphasis on Gender equality and women's rights. It's ok I've changed this statement to be true. Feminist Psychology puts a strong emphasis on women's rights.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 06:24 AM
1

So you just flat out disagree that love exists at all?
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:56 AM
0

Wtf??? No one is being put into camps here...
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:43 AM
1

That's not true at all. You don't need anonymity for democracy. You give the government your name and date of birth don't you? good bye anonymity.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 10:32 PM
-1

I honestly don't see what the problem with the government knowing your DNA code is. A significant portion of crimes would be solved instantly. What valid reason is there for a DNA sample of EVERY PERSON being taken at birth/entry into the country?
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:57 PM
1

No. No one is being forced to take a DNA test here...
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:47 PM
-4

I don't see what the problem is here if its voluntary. If it was compulsory then it would be an issue but to be honest it seems kind of stupid news really.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:12 AM
1

Just a point of opinion here. Personally I believe its that humans thrive on the negative parts of their lives. When you no longer have some of the negative things other people do in their lives, you just find other things to be negative about. I'm no different I do it myself. If you don't get it, think about that bit in the matrix where they explain why the first matrix didn't work.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 07:06 AM
2

In my country, New Zealand, the wife would have been arrested.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:54 PM
-16

There needs to be a Ban involved for posting this video...
/r/MensRights11/05/12 07:10 AM
2

Wouldn't it be better to just teach them that it's never OK to hit anyone period.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 11:06 AM
2

Milk chocolate and Dark chocolate. We know milk chocolate is milk chocolate. But if everyone else starts calling dark Chocolate milk chocolate, does real milk chocolate cease to be milk chocolate?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:58 AM
2

No that's what I meant a true feminist is, compared to today's mainstream femNazi bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:50 AM
0

FemNazi FTFY
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:43 AM
6

An Equal Rights Activist.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:34 AM
3

Consider if the roles were switched. If a group of men were talking about how much they wanted to have sex with some woman in the office while one woman sat quietly in the corner of the lunch room in would create a shit storm and those guys would all end up either fired or receiving written warnings.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:52 AM
0

It definitely isn't. Men are still more attracted to beautiful woman than ugly woman. Even if only initially.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:55 AM
1

How are you getting downvoted for this...
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:42 AM
1

There's no point even trying to argue with him. He has a very closed mind and refuses to admit he's wrong. Ever.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:39 AM
0

If you don't want to deal with the consequences of an act, don't do that act. So basically you should never have sex with anyone unless you want to have children with them? That is a very outdated train of thought. The availability of contraceptives and abortions allows for sex as a pleasure activity. The problem comes 9 months later when that random girl from a nightclub you slept with once decides she wanted to keep the baby and you're forced to pay for the next 18 years regardless of the fact…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:34 AM
3

I went to an all male school and the female PE teachers never came into the changing rooms. I don't know if this is some sort of rule they have to follow. But the female PE teachers would always just ask one of the male teachers to go in to convey any message. I'm in New Zealand btw.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:43 PM
1

That's sort of irrelevant at the moment though. You have to get the organization up and running before you head into any projects. As DoctorStorm said, donating $25 should buy you your right to vote for the project/s you think most worthy. I agree with this point as then the Organization heads towards a group decided venture. Personally I like the Prize-based incentives for research into male depression, male birth control, etc. and Scholarship organization for men As these are both ideas I've h…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:23 PM
2

I completely agreed. I'm quite disgusted that the person commenting under STLLOVINGMOM is trying to make it the guys fault. Even as far as stating: Sounds like he deserved what he got.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter