TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SamuraiGoblin Archive

View 1 posts and 416 comments by SamuraiGoblin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
69

social mediaSamuraiGoblin/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/26 01:56 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

She's literally saying all men rape. What an despicable bigot!
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/26 06:19 AM
35

That's the equivalent of saying, "It was so hot when women died in childbirth, but now they just get a caesarean in a comfy sterile hospital and everything is fine. Ick!" Pure evil.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/07/26 04:36 AM
54

"Men used to go to war to die in agony or be mutilated and suffer severe trauma, but now they don't, and that's bad because it gives me the ick." Gee, what a nice lady.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/07/26 04:05 AM
60

She literally calls the little crying orphan boys from an underdeveloped nation who depend on her for food, "her oppressors." She has a heart of pure evil.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 10:33 PM
1

Yes. The main difference between men and women in dating is that men can separate sex from emotional entanglement easier than women. Of course women can too, and of course men prefer sex with a women they love, but in general, men have much lower standards for sexual partners, which is obvious from an evolutionary perspective considering the difference in cost of reproduction. Women have a more holistic approach to attraction. Generally, when a woman sleeps with a man, she must already have deem…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 12:35 AM
10

Men have been sent off to die in wars since there have been humans. Men die in huge numbers daily while building and maintaining the infrastructure that makes her latte-sipping, Twitter-scrolling life so easy. Women greatly outnumber men graduating from university because the education system is now anti-male/pro-female, from kindergarten all the way up to doctorate level. Women have more rights and more protections than men in the Western world, and men off themselves in far greater numbers bec…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/26 11:38 PM
3

See this is why she gets pushback. "Men" didn't hurt her. Some shitty men (maybe even many) hurt her, but 'men' as a monolith didn't. I didn't. My brother and father and friends didn't. It's moral to push back against holding an entire group accountable for the actions of some of that group (the very definition of bigotry). I suspect the 'sexist' men who argue with her are just trying (unsuccessfully) to explain logic to her. We can have sympathy for victims, but not bigots.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/26 01:49 AM
1

Oh, that's okay then. As long as you say they don't exist, poof, they don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 11:23 PM
4

I literally just gave you two and you literally agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:47 PM
1

So I'm right. Glad we got that sorted.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 01:07 PM
3

Sigh, ignore the far more important point about incentives, why don't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:35 PM
3

If companies could get away with paying women less for the same work, they would, and they would never hire men. Every single one of them. It hasn't been legal to pay women less so since the 60s. You are objectively and demonstrably wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:31 PM
3

Not being drafted for war, and the ability to terminate a child. Those are rights men do not have.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:30 PM
6

I mostly agree with you, the problem comes when trying to determine the limits of such things. At what point do we say this or that inequality no longer exists, or is no longer relevant? For example, women now greatly outnumber men in graduating university. When, exactly do we say women aren't educationally oppressed any more and shouldn't have advantages like female-only scholarships that men don't have access to? At what point do we say it has gone too far the other way into systemic oppressio…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:33 AM
21

Ooh, a contrarian. Edgy!
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/26 09:14 AM
38

Any guy that might potentially go on a date with that woman is going to check out her social media posts. Ick!
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/26 05:17 AM
26

I am mimicking the writer of that post. I was going to put it in quotes, but it is next to 'dramatic' which needed to be in quotes.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/26 11:29 PM
55

There is not a single person in the world who would call a woman being graped 'dramatic' for crying, except perhaps the grapists themselves. What a moronic thing to write. I'll bet you anything that the woman who wrote that votes for politicians who make policies that release grapists from prison early.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/26 11:13 PM
15

You can't fix stupid.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/26 03:16 AM
2

"I don’t date a woman to have a sophisticated discussion" Oh, okay mate. That's quite an opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 11:10 PM
1

Exactly. If I came home and found a worm in my house instead of my wife, I would throw the worm outside and file a missing persons claim with the police. But if she was horrifically burned, I would still love her because I love her. The question is a nonsensical mind-game that has no correct answer. If a man answer's yes, it just means he will blatantly lie for a peaceful life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 11:05 PM
5

The question is moronic. A human can't BE a worm, and if they could, why would a human love it? It's the same kind of stupid TikTok shit as the 'would rather meet a bear' lie that so many women perpetuate. They think they are making a point, but men will always just see it for what it is: really fucking stupid. If women have insecurities about a relationship, they can use their big words and have an adult discussion about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:16 PM
158

He probably assumes everyone else has already had their pick, and that the last peach is what is left over, because that is what he is used to. I bet he thinks about her the kids waaaaaaaaay more than she gives him credit for. Also, when he does spoil them, or makes daily sacrifices or them, she simply doesn't see or acknowledge it.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/26 11:13 PM
50

"Women have always been the primary victims of war." - Hillary Clinton
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/26 03:53 PM
8

Grotesque.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 03:16 AM
4

Hehe, I read it as Joey using "PERIOD" is an imperative verb towards women. Like, "Don't get pregnant, MENSTRUATE!"
/r/EverydayMisandry21/06/26 12:50 AM
6

Neutering dogs drastically increases the risk of cancer, joint issues, obesity, and several other health issues. It's not moral to neuter dogs. It's moral to only get a dog once you are sure you can care for it properly.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/06/26 12:44 AM
52

"Heroic decent men who will intervene." Changing heroism to decency, for an altruistic act of putting yourself into possible mortal danger, sums up her entitlement and how she views men.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/26 11:29 PM
8

I pour water for my wife when we go out. I open doors, carry the heavy stuff, and do a million other little thoughtful things to treat her like a princess. The reason? Because she doesn't expect me to do those things (or if she does, she's never shown it). I love her because she loves me in return, as a human, not for the things I do for her. A woman showing that she expects me do do nice things for her is the surest way to get me to not do those things for her.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/26 11:22 PM
7

I lost too many brain cells checking out that sub.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/26 07:32 AM
25

An expensive ring is a show of commitment, but it was also a form of security because in the past women had limited financial options. In the case of the man unexpectedly running off or dying, the woman was still left with something that could see her through difficult times. But now men and women are equal. Women have equal opportunities and earn just as much as men (for the same work). Feminism removed the need for such gendered security. So the man is objectively correct, and the comments are…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 11:09 PM
30

I love how they ask "Are men toxic?" in the big font and give the result of how many men are not toxic (89.2%) in the same font, so a casual glance makes it look like the opposite result. Clearly intentional, and incredibly deceitful. What it should say is, "ONLY 3.2% of men are sexist."
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 08:12 AM
4

Why do you think this is a gendered issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:38 AM
13

"I'm going to convince our kids that I can beat you at Street Fighter 2, but you made it hard because you are so good at it." Yeah, it seems like cute banter, with a compliment thrown in.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/05/26 06:28 AM
19

What a genuinely stupid question.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 09:34 AM
8

When I look at fantasy shelves, it is nothing but bean-flicking smut featuring aggressive half-animal princes.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/05/26 12:06 AM
8

Indeed. These kinds of online echo chambers are rotting society
/r/EverydayMisandry15/05/26 11:20 PM
36

"I had a disappointing sexual encounter with a nervous, inexperienced man, and now I hate 50% of the population of the planet." Gee, that's a sane position.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/05/26 11:02 PM
49

She probably did say that. Kids repeat what they hear all the time.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/05/26 06:40 AM
47

Comments like that should put someone on a register.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/26 02:15 PM
4

No doubt the writer of that wants the good parts of a traditional relationship, like men paying for dates, protecting them, fixing their car, and killing spiders, AND the good parts of modern relationship, like sharing chores and 'emotional labour,' without any of the mutual sacrifice that comes with any relationship.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/26 12:26 AM
5

Yes, I read your drivel and responded.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 12:04 AM
2

The fishing metaphor is pretty stupid and only gets you so far. Manosphere 'gurus' use it to get lonely, desperate, frustrated men to subscribe to their expensive courses, but that's like taking shady advice from a greedy fishing-rod supplier rather than an actual fisherman. People catch fish either for sport, or to eat. Hopefully you're not planning to kill and eat women. Going through life thinking that women are 'sport' is not going to lead to long term happiness. And if you have to trick wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:53 PM
22

If you ask the people who say 'not all men,' you will also find that they will say 'not all women,' when it comes to false rape reports, gold-digging, and killing their infant children. It is a fact that not all women do those things. But you won't find the anti-'not all men' crowd also being anti-'not all women' (sorry for the triple negative there). We are consistent. We say 'not all men,' because we were taught that generalised prejudice based on immutable characteristics is called bigotry, w…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/26 11:07 PM
–

Are you okay buddy? You seem to be struggling with some issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 12:12 AM
48

Umm, 40 year old men aren't wanting to settle down and have children with an 18 year old man. Now, I'm not saying 18 year old women should marry 40 year old men, that's not a healthy age gap, but men evolved to be attracted to youth because younger women are healthier and have a greater fertility window. Shaming men for wanting a young women is as stupid as shaming women for wanting a rich man, in both cases they are attracted to what's high value for them. Whether they get what they want is ano…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/26 04:45 AM
14

The fact that it's gendered tells you everything. It isn't "everybody should be treated fairly and get what they deserve," it's "I want my tribe (women) to win over those stinky men."
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/26 01:48 AM
32

"Men are to blame." "For what?" "Ummm, whatever."
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/26 05:44 AM
7

It is extremely bigoted to conflate immutable characteristics with character.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/26 06:34 AM
1

"In my case some of the guys aren't sure who their real dad is." That's a problem with the system. The answer isn't to make a worse system, it's to fix the system by mandating paternity tests at birth. "I definitely know that there are children named after fathers they are not blood related to." Yes, and some people are raised by mothers who aren't blood related. So what??? Why the fuck aren't you getting it yet?
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/26 06:30 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/26 11:07 PM
2

And in our current system, each person is (theoretically) named after the man that sired them. So you wouldn't have people with last names of people that have no blood relation to them. You think children are not blood related to their fathers? I said flip the genders of everyone in your particular family dynamics. It's exactly the same because a child gets their genes from their mother and father equally. Are you really that dense?
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/26 10:47 PM
21

I was raised in the 80s, when society was objectively a lot more misogynistic than today. And I love my mother very much. If a man grows up to hate his mother (or women in general), it's probably fair to say she deserves some of the blame.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/26 06:37 AM
1

You could flip the genders on your situation and it would be the same. So your point is moot.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/26 02:25 AM
9

Your unique complex family dynamics are not a reason to structure society any particular way.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 02:50 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 12:10 AM
18

"Maternity is much less of a question than paternity." Yes, that's exactly why children (should) take their father's name. It's a construct to bind families together legally and socially. Otherwise the family unit will consist of children, their mother, whose connection to the children is never in question, and 'some dude who may or may not be floating around.'
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 12:02 AM
–

"Derpy derp, straight women are actually gay." Hmmm, I doubt our species would have survived if all our female ancestors were scissoring all the time. You have a porn-addled brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 11:39 AM
1

So what? Even if that were true, it is absolutely devastating when it does. Why don't you have empathy for anyone who suffers? Why do you reserve empathy just for 'your team'? And you seem to have miss the context of my comment. I wasn't playing victim, I was refuting an illogical sexist post. You need to work on your empathy and comprehension.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/26 03:35 AM
39

Misogyny: Calling a fat woman 'fat' Misandry: Women horrifically mutilating men by cutting their penises off See, we can all play that stupid, decietful game.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/26 11:10 PM
13

"it's often men who say it's better" I'd argue that's because abuse victims often continue the cycle of abuse to satisfy their cognitive dissonance. Men who have been circumcised are not readily going to admit to themselves that their loving parents mutilated them without their consent, which is what actually happened, so they will minimise the impact and continue the cycle of mutilation on their kids because that easier than dealing with the harsh reality. It's also why FGM is usually perpetrat…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:08 AM
11

This has "would you rather meet man or bear?" vibes. It's women brazenly lying for meaningless cheers from other women.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 09:54 AM
9

Does a woman have to have a bunch of books written by men about men in order to understand our psyche? How many women today exclusively read female-author fantasy smut about plain women being used by aggressive, well-endowed fae princes?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 09:26 PM
0

"Men, on average, tend to prefer younger women*, and perceived youth is linked to attractiveness"* This comes from the fact that males have no guarantee of paternity. Evolution mitigated the problem by making them more attracted to youth and purity, and having heightened sexual jealousy. Women are attracted to strength (and height) for their own reasons relating to their sexual role, that of needing protection and provision while vulnerable during gestating and nurturing. Humans are a very messy…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:56 PM
17

What the fuck are you even on about?
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 04:53 AM
31

What a stupid question. I am rebutting the sexist assertion that men as a group are useless.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 04:38 AM
13

Sigh. NOBODY is ignoring atrocities. SOME women have raped and molested children too, sure, not as much as SOME men, but so what? SOME women have still have committed heinous atrocities. Therefore we should demonise ALL female sexuality too? My guess is that you will say no. Women commit infanticide more than men, women commit 100% of all abortions, women commit nearly 100% of false accusations that ruin the lives of men, lesbian relationships have the highest rates of domestic violence, blah bl…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 04:36 AM
26

"Somehow men, treat this as worse? Why" And women are usually on the opposite side, championing gold diggers and demonising male sexuality. It's a form of tribalism and personalised empathy (only having empathy if you can relate). "To be clear I think there are way more men who pursue women for sex than pursue women for any sort of money;" And there are way more women who pursue men for money than sex. Men and women are different, with different reproductive roles and evolved desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:40 PM
54

It always makes me wonder how these silly women can sit in their houses (that men built), typing misandrist shit on their iPhones (that men invented, designed, mined materials for, built, and programmed), snug in their relatively safe world (protect from wild animals and evil people by men). "Women evolve, men devolve" What a genuinely stupid phrase.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:17 PM
5

My dream girl isn't an arsehole, by definition.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 12:14 AM
18

So, he wants some pussy and will say anything to get it?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/26 09:16 AM
1

"Only a really lucky woman gets to be loved by a misogynistic pig." Hmmm, nope, still doesn't make sense.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/26 01:40 AM
2

Whenever I see drivel like this I wonder, why wouldn't the reverse be true? Why isn't heterosexuality a ploy to limit men's potential and ensure women dominate society? What exactly is the 'logic' here?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 03:00 PM
5

Imagine a guy saying, "can women with small boobs just die already!"
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 02:19 PM
24

No idea who that is, thankfully. Now, just flip the gender of her message and see how well it's received.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 02:13 PM
4

We can all play this game. Men using AI: 'Which flowers to buy for my lovely wife?' 'How to look after sick puppies?' 'Which is the best breast cancer charity to donate to?' Women using AI: 'How to make my false allegations look rock solid to ensure the guy who rejected my advances has his life completely ruined?' See what I did there?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 02:01 PM
14

The pertinent question is, in which Western country is misogyny systemic? If they want to talk about Iran or Saudia Arabia, then we would all agree with them, but of course they are not. How is a country systemically misogynistic if so many stats like suicide rates and academic graduations favour women?
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/26 11:19 PM
16

When I was a kid I did ballet, the only boy in the class. A few kids at school snickered and called it gay. I never understood what part of a little dude dancing with 20 girls is supposed to be 'gay'?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/26 10:55 PM
9

I was with you up until the absolutely ridiculous 'baby boys die more than their mothers, therefore being a woman is safer.' Umm, how about baby girls dying? And how about men not having to worry about dying while giving birth? It was a stupid point to make, undermining your whole post.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 07:37 AM
4

Ummm, to get to know the other person. What's the alternative? Dinner, where the guy is expected to pay? The opera? Infiltrating Area 51 together? Going out for drinks is the standard social occasion. It's low-commitment, public, convenient, affordable, and relaxing. And if someone doesn't want to drink alcohol, there are plenty of delicious non-alcoholic beverages available. People who assume there are ulterior motives have mental issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 07:26 AM
20

When women fantasise about a world without men, what they mean is, a world where men aren't allowed outside, except to work. They will still want men inventing new iPhones, programming Bejewelled-type games for them, making movies they can flick their beans to, sweeping the streets, fighting wars to keep them safe, putting out fires and pulling women from burning buildings, killing animals (for food and protection), working the fields in the blistering sun, building ALL the buildings and infrast…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 10:44 PM
63

Don't worry everyone, a 13 year old boy will NOT be hurt by being groomed and raped by an adult, because someone online said so. Phew! We can rest easy now.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 06:28 AM
30

If they also call bisexual women 'sexually deviant,' I would at least give them points for consistency in their bigotry. But I suspect that, to them, bisexual women are 'strong' and 'brave' and the good part of the LGBT community.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/03/26 10:50 PM
38

All we need to do is reverse it: A stay at home father is struggling with sleep deprivation. The working wife comes in and the father is happy. I have no doubt she would get praise in the comments, about how she is able to juggle home and work life, about how she has to do everything. Or, another way to reverse it: Let's see it from the man's point of view. He comes home from a hard day of work and sees his happy kid in the arms of his loving wife. And the point is how great a mother his wife is…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/03/26 12:04 AM
17

The first word that springs to mind is 'pathetic.' The second is 'cringe.'
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 04:42 AM
2

What a genuinely loathsome person! And the funny part is that she talks about being kind. Ellen Degeneres vibes.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 04:26 AM
4

There are different types of loneliness. Yes, I can imagine it's a lonely feeling to only be seen as a sexual object, which is something that no (or very few) men will ever understand. However, a woman, attractive or not, at least have some human interaction. People will talk to her about the weather at a bus stop. People will smile at her as she walks past and say hello. People will ask her to fill in questionnaires about detergent. People will stop to help if she is stranded or struggling. And…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 09:28 AM
36

"The water (women) is implied here that it's good and safe to drink when compared to swamp water(men), when in actuality the water can just be as unsafe or unhealthy to drink in a desert." You are reading too much into it. Where does it say or imply that women are clean/safe water? An oasis in the desert is going to be stagnant, filled with diseases/parasites, and submerged crocodiles ready to pounce. The adage is not saying anything about the quality of the water. It's merely pointing out that …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 06:12 AM
21

"Vigliarole believed the three girls were prostitutes who were going to have sex with him." "He was a homo anyway." Hmmm, women's logic 101.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 12:12 AM
30

We can also do that: The effect of misogyny: a woman got called fat once and it hurt her feefees. The effect of misandry: Men all over the world are put in prison, fired from their jobs, have their children taken away, their lives ruined, and even killed because of false accusations. It's so tiring to see these shitty takes pitting one side against the other. I'll bet that meme was created by a woman who believes that women have all the empathy.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 12:07 AM
39

The post clearly states that he got support from a few male friends but no sympathy from any women. How exactly does that align with your claims of "tHe PaTrIaRcHy?" Let me get this straight, men are to blame for women having no sympathy? Do you not see a teeny tiny flaw in that logic?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/03/26 05:38 AM
23

"They assume women are aiming “above their league.”" Many women aim above their league in terms of socioeconomic status, just as many men aim above their league in terms of sexual market value. "They insist most women are average at best." Half of all women are average at best. "People have even called Margot Robbie or Sydney Sweeney “mid.”" Sure, there are plenty of trolls and arseholes out there who will be shitty. But everyone has a right to their opinion, and people in the public eye are hea…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 10:04 AM
41

And women commit 100/100 paternity fraud and 100/100 false rape reports. It's pointless making the gender wars an Olympics sport. We should be addressing any area where people are harmed.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 09:48 AM
1

"To me, he and I would be the victims of her behavior." Indeed.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 03:01 PM
59

This has the same energy as, "you can't be racist against white people because...ummm, the Orwellian reasons I just made up."
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/26 12:03 AM
20

The legal system needs to have common sense and common decency as a loophole on every case.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/26 12:22 AM
23

Let me guess, this was written by a member of the group that are said (by themselves) to hold all the empathy?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/03/26 05:21 AM
5

What a twat!
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 07:08 AM
32

"Men can never understand how women feel. But I understand the minds of men completely."
/r/EverydayMisandry25/02/26 03:48 AM
2

Why is this a gendered question? In a healthy relationship, people get out of it what they put in. In a toxic relationship, there is an gross imbalance. It's a non-gendered issue with a simple (but often not easy) solution: don't be in a toxic relationship with an abusive person.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 11:44 PM
11

I am not saying women are useless. I am ridiculing the idiots who say that men are useless. Try to see the difference.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/26 01:56 PM
71

Look at all those strong independent women holding up the building blocks of society. Working the oil rigs, cutting down trees, fighting the wars, keeping our streets safe, growing and slaughtering and processing our food, designing and constructing and maintaining and cleaning our buildings and infrastructure, inventing the future. All without those annoying men. You go girls!
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/26 10:14 PM
6

Somehow, it's always men's fault.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/02/26 12:28 AM
26

These takes always amaze me. The reason why men are women's 'primary natural predator,' is because men made the world much safer for women by eliminating all actual natural predators. A few women are killed each year by men, rather than a lot of women being killed by bears and wolves. Thanks to men.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/26 02:19 PM
10

Yeah, I grew up watching The Golden Girls, a wonderful comedy series about four old ladies. It was never demeaning to refer to women as 'girls.'
/r/EverydayMisandry08/02/26 10:21 AM
20

People see what they want to see, what they are primed to see.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/02/26 05:33 AM
23

Imagine flipping the genders and watching their heads explode.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/02/26 04:00 PM
120

And women under a certain BMI?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 12:42 AM
1

It all comes down to reproduction cost. It is tremendously high for women, and extremely cheap for men. This means that females had to become very selective. And for that reason, women have innate (sexual) value, whereas men have to prove theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 11:00 AM
9

Non-medically-necessary circumcision (or lack thereof) is not the domain of any particular religion. There is either the needless mutilation of children or there isn't.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/26 02:50 AM
1

At a fundamental, evolutionary level, the deportation of illegal immigrants is the tribe's men trying to protect the tribe's women from male invaders. How is that small d energy? It amazes me that these people are protecting actual criminals. Everyone agrees that legal immigration is fine, it's the illegals that need to go. Truly amazing times we live in.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/26 11:37 PM
30

It is literally addressed to Mommy. How evil you have to be to find a tentative problem with this sweet gesture.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/01/26 08:36 AM
23

The answer for this woman is simple. Date women, but have meaningless sex with men. She can ask almost any man just to give her a quick, meaningless, no-strings-attached fuck up against the bins behind McDonalds. Then she's free to go on dates with women like herself where they can revel in their misandry. Solved!
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/26 01:14 AM
5

Let's take a look at how many convicts were raised in single mother homes versus those raised in single father homes. Oh my! I'm not saying men are better. I am saying children need both male AND female care, nurturing, play, and role models.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/26 01:07 AM
4

So, let me get this straight, men invent technology, men build technology, men maintain that technology, men create tech businesses, and hire men to program social media apps, that can ultimately only be used by women?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/26 10:24 PM
1

Humans driven by their base instincts. Society guides that. Women ARE attracted to strength because they evolved that way. Broken women allow that attraction to fall upon murderers. "This type of reductionism is so typical of misogynistic thought." Yawn! You dilute the meaning of words like 'mysogyny' if you use them for someone pointing our innate differences between the sexes. Men are ALSO driven by innate, evolved instincts, which I am sure you are more than happy to agree with. How that driv…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 11:54 PM
9

Innate biological desires don't understand complex modern social constructs such as prison. The women falling in love with Ted Bundy are attracted to his perceived ability to protect them. In cavemen tribes, psychopathy and status were probably synonymous most of the time. In a world where might makes right, being the strongest means being at the top. "He single-handedly slaughtered a dozen of our tribal neighbours, what a catch!" Hybristophilia and hypergamy are words we use to distinguish prim…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:23 AM
19

"Derp, derp cannot compute!"
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 11:29 PM
10

"Some people did bad things to others. So I like it when I see other people doing bad stuff to completely different, innocent people."
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/26 03:25 AM
12

Oh yes, that's right, not a single man ever does anything productive.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/26 04:24 AM
0

We need people to agree that two groups can have their own unique problems. Talking about how paternity fraud ruins lives isn't an attack on women's rights, and discussing rape statistics isn't an indictment of all men. People just need to calm down and have mature discussions these topics. We can (and we should) acknowledge and deal with multiple issues at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 02:36 AM
29

'Men are trash.' Nope, men built and maintain society, killed our natural predators, cured diseases, and went to the moon. 'Some men are trash.' Sure. We can all agree on that, there's plenty of arseholes out there, but that's not what is being said.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/01/26 11:08 PM
2

So, misandry doesn't exist because some trolls online talked shit about a woman? Logic not logicking.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/26 03:13 AM
17

I just sought out the original post. The answers from some women are completely unhinged.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/25 12:13 AM
-14

Any guy that remains in a blatantly sexist company like that deserves getting their pay cut.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/25 09:49 AM
73

I love how it contradicts itself. "Making generalisations is hateful." Oh, is it? Is it really?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/25 01:06 AM
27

I lost IQ points reading that.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 02:50 PM
22

She thinks she did a thing. Worthy of r/im14andthisisdeep/
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 11:59 PM
36

You can guarantee that the women who think like this will say that men still have to approach women, pay for dates, and carry the burden of financial responsibility, but also we need to pay women more than men to make up for the earnings (not wage) gap, and we need affirmative action to have more female politicians and CEOs.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/25 01:17 AM
17

I have never heard anyone say that women SA more than men. But I have heard people say that SA against men isn't taken as seriously as it should be, and that there is less reporting because men AND women will dismiss it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 01:59 AM
95

This is like saying, 'imagine if women got more of an ick from false rape reports than they do upon seeing their boyfriends cry.'
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/25 10:22 PM
38

It's true, men are women's only natural predator. Why? Because men created a safe(ish) world for women where all the other natural predators aren't an issue any more. Men tamed the beasts, men cured diseases, men built and maintain a cosy infrastructure in which women can type misandrist shit on their iphones while slurping a pumpkin spice latte from Starbucks.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/25 08:30 AM
46

There are three types of accusations of mansplaining: 1) An encounter with a genuine sexist bigot who thinks women are mentally inferior 2) A woman who doesn't understand that men communicate in a more direct and systematic way 3) A woman who knows her position is indefensible and uses accusation of 'mansplaining' to deflect I think #1 is the rarest, #2 is the most common, with #3 not far behind.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/25 06:14 AM
28

"so now I HAVE to be skinny for him." Umm, no you don't. First of all, he politely gave you an option. But assuming it wasn't, if you are already a healthy weight, you could tell him to fuck off and find a man who doesn't want a skeleton. If not, you could exercise and be healthier. Lots of agency to be had. I think a lot of this man-hating is women blaming men for their own lack of confidence.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 10:34 PM
44

It is quite incredible the mental gymnastics people will go through to paint their tribe as 'the good guys' and the other tribe as 'the bad guys' on any topic.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 10:27 PM
27

Yeah, you can tell that's the result of indoctrination rather than contemplation.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 05:26 AM
15

"Victim blaming and perpetrator excusing are only bad when other people do it."
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 03:14 AM
88

Misandrists don't specifically target misogynists with their hate, they hate ALL men, even those who would be on their side. This is mental gymnastics to defend their own bigotry.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/25 10:40 PM
118

"Women have much more empathy than men!" Yeah, for anyone who isn't a man.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/25 04:27 AM
55

"ALL men are scum because they ALL generalise women! Grrr!!!"
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/25 12:00 AM
3

My ex-wife and her mother put shrimps into my food after I told them I was allergic, and they laughed about me eating it. Obviously I didn't die, but I was really sick that evening. Men don't have a monopoly on 'being shitty.'
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/25 10:51 PM
38

Don't want to be mugged? Then never leave your house! Also, a male virgin can still be falsely accused.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/25 07:50 AM
9

I am not able to receive your Male Extraordinary Announcement Transmissions. Give me your MEAT!
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/25 10:55 PM
115

I don't remember the meeting where we all decided to 'create the patriarchy.' Can someone remind me please. Maybe I was absent that day?
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/25 03:40 PM
23

But...I thought women were the ones who are caring, and it's men that are incapable of empathy?
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/25 05:25 AM
67

The gap shouldn't be growing, it should be shrinking. If the sex of the population is split 50/50, and we want an egalitarian society where everybody is free to choose their vocational path, then men and women should be graduating at roughly equal rates, otherwise, there is something seriously wrong with the system. In the past, when male graduates outnumbered females, feminists were right to call out the systemic imbalance and demand change. Now they should be calling it out the other way. Are …
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 10:05 AM
10

Perhaps her friends are jealous of having a partner who washes up a cup instead of leaving it by the sink, but I am sure they are happy when their male partners do traditional male stuff, like protecting them from spiders and intruders, building and fixing things all around the house and garden, always making sure her car runs smoothly, etc. I'm not saying certain women can't do those things, but those are the things men are generally much better at, things that women often dismiss and are exemp…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/11/25 10:34 PM
35

"Women...are also obligated to date someone if they're compatible with someone in their circle" This basically sounds like a girl in your friend group rejected you and you want society to force her to have sex with you. I don't really know what point you are trying to make because your whole post was incoherent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 01:48 PM
2

Begone troll!
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 02:54 AM
5

Yawn
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 10:11 PM
12

Men have way higher suicide rates than women, so until we have a global male suicide rate of zero, I don't want to hear a peep about any woman's mental health issues. Is that fair?
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 09:10 AM
73

The issue is that fetal hormones will somewhat clash against maternal ones. There is a mismatch of hormones when a woman gestates a member of the opposite sex. Also, due to sexual dimorphism, male fetuses put more resources into growth rather than flexibility, whereas females are the opposite, resulting in female fetuses handling stress better. To make an ideological statement about men and women based on nuanced differences in morphogenesis is fucking moronic.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/25 11:06 PM
2

I think most men would be happy to have a woman interacting with them like that, and the fact that you don't know that is the opposite side of the problem. Some men can't understand why women would be upset at something like that, or can't understand why wolf-whistles aren't taken as a compliment, because they project the situation onto themselves and would like nothing more than to have a woman interact with them in that way. Because, in general, men get way too little attention from the opposi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 12:18 AM
22

"Men who think predation is an unfortunate fact of life." This reminds me of something. If a man dares to advise women against walking alone from a club, drunk, through a dark park at 2am in a miniskirt, crop-top, and high-heels, feminists will scream that he is a slut-shaming, victim-blaming misogynist. No, they are realists who are trying to pragmatically protect women against attacks from predators. Now, men can't do anything about the creeps hiding in bushes at 2am. All they can do is advise…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/25 12:00 AM
6

There was a reason chivalrous knights would simp over beautiful, pure, pedestal-perched maidens. She was a genuine prize. You can't expect modern men to be chivalrous towards women who simply aren't worth being chivalrous for. I like the fact that she almost orgasms at the fantasy of how much her future husband will simp for her, but doesn't say anything about what she will do for him, except a handwaving dismissal of the issue with something about women's nurturing being 'natural' (therefore no…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/10/25 11:02 PM
10

"Men" don't start wars. A few people (who admittedly are mostly men), who are usually voted in by populations of men AND women, start wars. The men fleeing war zones are NOT the ones who start the wars. They are as guilty of the problems as the women fleeing. It's the epitome of sexism to blame an entire sex for the deeds of a few.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/10/25 09:48 PM
17

"Empathy, what's that?"
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/25 12:51 PM
11

Abuse is abuse. People who play 'abuse olympics' are the real problem with society.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 09:48 PM
77

So, an unwanted pregnancy is ALL men's fault? Women have absolutely no say in getting pregnant, right??
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 09:14 AM
44

Say it with me kids: flip the genders and watch them freak out.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 12:38 AM
3

This has the same energy as Hillary Clinton's "Millions of men are tortured, raped, mutilated, and killed in war...women most affected."
/r/EverydayMisandry18/10/25 07:44 AM
2

Why is this a question? Of course it is.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/10/25 07:40 AM
–

Women are the gatekeepers of sex. So getting (just) sex for women is super easy, while for a man, getting sex requires that he have all kinds of value. Not the same thing at all. Blame biology and our sexual dimorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:58 PM
2

You'll note that I didn't get on to addressing couples with kids. I specifically started with couples without kids and got bored. It's literally how I stared my comment. So your comment is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:56 PM
0

"First, for couples without kids: how is a 50/50 boyfriend any different from a roommate you sleep with?" How is it different for the man either? Are you saying a relationship is just about sex, not other things like love and romance? That's pretty cynical and transactional of you. Or are you saying sex is something only men want? That's very misogynistic of you. Women are sexual creatures just as much as men, right? Or are you saying that sex is value that women bring to a relationship. How obj…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:40 PM
0

There are many people who have a scat fetish, why is that? Innate biases can be overridden by upbringing and experience and natural human variation, it doesn't mean they don't exist in a large portion of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 10:33 PM
0

Ah, so all human emotions, including disgust, are learned behaviours? We learn to be disgusted by the smell of faeces, the sight of blood and disease, and the motion of spiders and snakes?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:40 PM
1

Innate disgust comes from evolutionary biology. Where do think it comes from?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:26 PM
1

So, you are agreeing with me then?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:20 PM
0

DNA tests cannot override innate biases and preferences laid down by dozens of millions of years of evolution. Short men are just as capable of being financially stable and supporting a family as tall men, but women still resoundingly prefer tall men. Why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:07 PM
-3

In most species, because its the female lays eggs or gestates young, males have no guarantee of paternity. Evolution mitigated the issue in dragonflies by endowing the males with a spatula to scoop out sperm deposited by previous males before depositing their own. In humans, the issue was mitigated by evolving males with an innate disgust of promiscuous females. And women dislike promiscuous women (just as much as males do) because such behaviour devalues their own innate sexual value within the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 02:57 PM
2

Yeah, I think it putting a label on something that doesn't need one. The truth is that hearing someone speak excitedly and authoritatively about topic they are passionate about is attractive regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 12:07 AM
6

Nope. Most men will simply opt for the single/peaceful life if there are zero childless women around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 10:45 PM
-1

I think that's half of it. The other half is that men and women are sexually dimorphic, and evolution bestowed us with different desires. Men desire beauty (visible signs of fertility), youth (longer fertility window), and purity (because men have no guarantee of paternity), while women desire strength, status, and stability (for provision and protection while vulnerable). And it's pure projection that causes women to dislike age gaps. Because they simply can't imagine being attracted to a man m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:40 AM
2

So, women can vote, so when women have issues, it's because women aren't trying hard enough to fix them?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 12:27 PM
4

Wow! Just wow! How about issues of custody bias; paternity fraud; longer jail time for the same crimes; conscription; forced genital mutilation; lack of mental health support leading to way higher suicide rates; lack of sympathy or support as victims of rape, sexual abuse, or domestic violence, whilst also being the default assumed perpetrator; underrepresentation in academia at all levels; overrepresentation in dangerous occupations; life ruining false allegations without consequences; and many…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 12:23 AM
6

"that men put on us like beauty standards" Nope. It's predominantly women who do that. "I don’t even care if he’s hot or masculine" Yes you do. "men don’t understand the hard work women have to put in in this day and age" And do you understand the issues men face today? Or do you dismiss them because you don't see them, and you are pissed at your current crappy lazy partner that you chose? "At the end of the day women are expected to be strong and independent" Yeah, by feminists and greedy corpo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 11:43 PM
7

"Would you rather be a slave who has to deal with being constantly raped by master or a poor person who never gets to procreate?" In your analogy you are equating modern women who have to put up with catcalls and stares to actual slaves who were constantly and brutally raped, whilst you equate modern men who are poor and sexless to other men who were poor and sexless. Your other analogies aren't any better. I think you are not arguing in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 12:35 AM
2

I would maximise my chances to meet men by putting myself among them, by joining a woodworking class, robotics team, shooting/archery club, hiking/camping/outdoors groups, etc, even if I don't (initially) have an interest in such things. I would avoid the arrogant/pretty/alpha/wild boys, and target more average looking men who display sincerity, work ethics, loyalty, and other desirable traits. They might be a bit shy, awkward, and boring at first, but I could help guide them into being more con…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 11:33 PM
0

Nope. They are frustrated at the blatant manipulation and stupidity of lying about a serious issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 09:46 AM
0

"look at the man vs bear debate. I think a lot of men felt very hurt emotionally from it and that is why they reacted so angrily" Haha! There is not a single man in the entire world was 'emotionally hurt' by it. The men complaining about it are merely annoyed that women can't have a logical/rational/straightforward debate about something important. Your entire post shows that you really have no understanding of men at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 08:05 AM
2

How does that refute my comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:57 PM
3

Then why the hell did you comment in the first place, attacking my claim that men are sent off to war?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:06 AM
4

"But it’s still ensuring..." So you defend conscription. "then she can..." So, optional for women only? And what do you think of the pay gap?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:40 AM
4

You do know conscription in many countries isn't optional, right? How does that not make men disposable? Also, do you think women should be able to be firefighters if they want to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:24 AM
7

"Ideally no one breastfeeds." Is that a joke? It is extremely well known what benefits to a mother and child breastfeeding has, in terms of optimal nutrition, immune system, maternal bonding, etc. Saying nobody should breastfeed in utterly insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:48 AM
4

You're so close to redpilling. You're so close to understanding why men don't want to be getting married any more, why there are more divorces than ever, and why the birth rates in some areas are plummeting. Both men and women implicitly know that women have inherent value. That is why men are sent off to war, they do the dangerous dirty jobs, protect women and children first in an emergency, and so on. The problem is that while gender equality is good in many way, it is at odds with biologicall…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:25 AM
1

Based on the fact that we are a sexually dimorphic species. I don't have a paper to cite to show that men and women are different and have different roles in biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:24 AM
2

Nope. Can you?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:11 AM
12

I think traditional gender norms reflect innate biological desires and biases, and are a good fit for a lot of people. Men in general want to be pursuers and providers, and women in general want to be pursued and nurturing. However, that doesn't mean we have to be beholden to them. The people who don't fit those roles shouldn't be ridiculed, bullied, or ostracised. They should be free to find a good fit for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 02:24 AM
3

No, because it is innate. Men evolved to be less interested in committing their emotions and resources to promiscuous women because they have no guarantee of paternity. Women bear the cost of having children, so sex with them has inherent value (evolutionarily speaking). These innate biases manifest as the social issues you discussed in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 02:40 AM
4

You really need help.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 02:05 PM
6

I don't know what the vague "see the posts below me" means. If you have a specific post to show, then link to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 05:13 PM
9

Good. Evidence is always important.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 01:25 PM
9

Are you joking? That post literally mentions that women's safety concerns are valid, multiple times. And it notes that women are at greater risk for sexual violence. What on earth did you think your point is? I asked for an example of where a man claims both sides of the argument, that women are safe and they aren't safe, in response to OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 01:23 PM
10

Show me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 12:42 PM
21

This sounds like a case of "I once heard a man say this, and I once heard another man say that, so I am going to rant about how all 'Men' are hypocrites for saying 'this and that'." Can you point to an instance where one man says both mutually exclusive things?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 11:14 AM
11

Yeah, there's a difference between being attracted to status and being raped. Your point is completely null and void.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 09:42 PM
–

Humans aren't a blank amorphous sheet when they are born. We are born with all kinds of innate biases and preferences that shaped us through our complex evolutionary history. So, you think women's preference for tall men isn't innate? You think that they were taught by society to get turned on by tall men?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 12:42 AM
–

If a man has a good job, his height is irrelevant. Why do so many women reject short men, when height has no bearing on personality or ability to provide? It's because it IS innate, the same as male attraction to youth and purity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 11:23 AM
1

And yet you understood what I meant. That's language for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 03:45 AM
-2

Self-replication (wanting children) is literally the most innate desire in every species. If it weren't, they wouldn't be here. A lot of people in first world countries don't want children because of things like media brainwashing, a fucked dating scene, and suffocating economics. But there will always be others who do want children to fill the genetic vacuum.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 12:06 AM
0

Infidelity is a global problem, and men and women cheat with around equal frequency. There is no possible way a person can know for a fact that a person won't cheat when they marry them. If they did, divorce rates would be much lower because far fewer people would get married to a 'blatantly cheatable partner.' You saying there is, is a slap in the face to every single person who has ever been crushed by a cheating partner, male or female. You are saying to each one of them they should have chos…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 12:01 AM
4

No, the male preference for purity comes from an evolved mechanism to counter the fact that males have no guarantee of paternity. It is as innate as women's desire for strong, tall men. It's exactly the same thing. Unfortunately, too many men take it way to far and it becomes toxic and predatory and dangerous, which we need to stamp out. But it's not a mystery where it comes from, and it is not about 'ego.'
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 11:16 PM
4

*to When people accept which league they are in, they are attracted to the best of that league. If someone knows they are a 3 or 4, they know that they shouldn't go after 8s and 9s. They look around for 4s and 5s.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 11:45 PM
3

The Japanese lady looks like she will bring peace, a sense of humour, and lack of mind games to the relationship. Sydney, as beautiful as she is, looks like she will be high maintenance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:41 PM
5

Sure. I don't think many people will disagree with you here. Everyone should have more to offer than one thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:53 PM
3

So, logic hard, huh? If I say a lot of people like X, I am not saying all people like X. Also, a 'lot' can mean a dozen, or it can mean billions, depending on context. Or are you just a troll?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 03:33 PM
3

No, I'm happily married to a wonderful woman, thank you very much. Your lazy dismissal of my point was totally expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 12:58 PM
16

The problem is that even when women do notice that a guy is arsehole, a lot of them like that aspect to him at first and think they can 'fix' him. 'Hybristophilia' is the word for falling in love with a criminal, and the number of love letters that violent male criminals receive from random women they've never met is astounding. It is so common it has become a trope. When men say, "choose better," they are saying, "the 'bad boy' might excite you now, but he's not a good option for a long term pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:45 PM
0

"Men think "average" and envision Margot Robbie w brown hair and glasses" No they don't. There is not a single man who has ever existed who has thought that. You have been watching too many shitty 90s romcoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 11:48 PM
3

"This isn't even limited to relationships. Men with fragile egos in the workplace..." You think this is gendered? You think men don't have stories about having to walk on eggshells around some of the women in their lives? We all do. Your problem is that you frame 'shitty personality' as a male only problem. "If your first instinct is to mock rather than reflect" I didn't mock, I gave you three possibilities, including the sexist one which you seem to think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 06:34 AM
12

Three possibilities: ALL men in the entire world are exhausting and a have fragile egos You make really bad choices, and even the ones you think are good, aren't You are the insufferable common denominator
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 06:18 AM
9

I live in Japan, and the idea that people who end themselves just 'can't handle competitiveness' is one of the most offensive things I have ever read on Reddit. While the rest of your post is just idiotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:30 AM
8

This is the best comment I have read in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:19 AM
4

"You can't be an expert on testicular cancer if you are a woman." "You can't be a gynaecologist is you are a man." "You can be an expert on ancient Greek mythology if you aren't an ancient Greek poet." People can understand the issues and nuance of a topic without necessarily being a part of (or directly affected by) it. I don't agree with the red pill position, but I also don't agree with needless gatekeeping. A virgin is allowed to have and voice their opinions on sexual dynamics, based on wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 10:36 PM
1

And sons were sold for the strength in their backs. What an absurd rebuttal! Females are the selectors OF THE SPECIES. Our female ancestors, in general, chose mates based on things like strength and courtship displays. And women were traded for goats BECAUSE they had innate value. Having goat was literally the difference between life and death of a tribe in those days. A goat's life was a lot more valuable than most people. It's easy to sit in your comfortable 21st century life and say, "goats a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 11:11 PM
2

"you'll never get a man if you ..." Is a very common phrase heard by women too. Your point is diluted. Women have been the prize historically because they are the selectors of the species. In our species, males have had to win the right to mate for millions of years, it comes from being a sexual dimorphic species, and early human concepts like chivalry and harems are the cultural manifestations of deeply biological mores. Do we call it 'misogyny,' or do we call it the evolution of societies wher…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 10:16 PM
2

Yes to race, quiet, talkative, SAH mum, live with parents, same name as my mum. Although I don't know what a sorority is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 12:27 AM
6

"News just in: straight men are gay." Someone had a brain fart thought they did something. Are there misogynistic men who don't respect women? Sure, just as there are misandrist women that don't respect men. There are arseholes everywhere. Such disrespect manifests differently, but it's still just bigotry. Men can bond with other men in a way they can't with women, just like women can bond with women in a way they can't with men. It's because we are different, and we relate differently. There is…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:17 PM
7

Because many women like it in principle, they like the thought of shared vulnerability bringing them closer to their partner, but when they are actually faced with it, they have a visceral 'ick.' Also, there is an ideological aspect to it. A lot of women have been told that men and women should be treated the same. It started because of gender inequality, but as with anything, people who don't truly understand the issues take things at face value and end up taking them too far. This resulted in …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 02:54 AM
13

I think there's a good point to be made about men not being 'intimidated' by successful women, that it is the wrong word to use, and that people shouldn't think of women as competitors with men. But sadly you wrap your point in misogynistic language, so it's impossible to agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 10:52 PM
16

Men have their own problems: Custody bias, sentence length bias, false SA accusations, dying earlier, suicide and homelessness, being utterly disposable, being utterly invisible, being seen as a wallet and nothing else, "women and children first", value tied to what they can provide not who they are, etc. Both sexes have sex-based problems. Your problem is that you are tribalistic and want your 'team' to 'win,' rather than being sympathetic to anyone's issues. I see from your history you are veh…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 05:44 AM
22

Many of these points have a male equivalent. Many of these points are the fault of biology. Many of these points are also the fault of other women. Many of these are simply nonsensical. And many are outright lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 05:33 AM
3

"Theoretically, I could take my trash to the city dump, therefore garbage men don't deserve to be paid." Entitled people like that are going to have a very difficult life, unable to keep friends, unable to have a harmonious family life, unable to keep a non-toxic partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:22 AM
11

News at 10: Some women are selfish, men to blame.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 02:58 AM
0

I don't necessarily agree or disagree with you, but you seem to put it ALL down to society, and it particular, the incredibly dreaded but also incredibly vague 'pAtRiArChy.' You seem to be saying it's all men's fault, and that women are completely innocent and without agency or thoughts of their own. Is the Earth's global society one big behemoth where men are oppressing women and telling them how to behave and think? And how much of it is innate? How much of the difference between the way men a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:04 AM
1

I believe it. Now, do you believe men when they say they don't want emaciated women caked in makeup? It's the same issue. People see a preference of the opposite sex and take it to extremes. There are women out there who get boob jobs to be as big as possible, thinking that bigger = better. There are men who think more muscles = more attractive. They both can be nice to look at, but at the end of the day, when considering a partner, people want fit and natural and normal. A man who makes his who…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:17 PM
2

Who the fuck is Jamie? Context please.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 10:46 PM
0

Most men will tell you that it is reasonable for a woman to put financial stability as a priority when looking for a serious partner. The problem is when women take it too far or have nothing to offer in return. Basically, when they are clearly looking to exploit men. Also, men are HUGELY shamed by women for desiring youth. Just as we have the phrase 'gold digger,' we also have the phrase 'cradle snatcher,' which is usually directed at men. And since limited fertility is more of a female problem…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 10:41 PM
1

I think there is a visceral assumption that a single mother was lumbered with her children because she irresponsibly chose to have sex with an irresponsible guy, whereas a single father responsibly stepped up when the irresponsible mother fled. It's not fair, but it is understandable, because reproductive biology is asymmetric. Women are the ones who get pregnant. If two irresponsible people have sex, the developing baby remains with the mother. The father might not even know about it, if it was…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 10:31 PM
12

"Its why dating for women is so much more difficult than it is for men." Being a millionaire is so much harder than being poor, because Ferraris come in a variety of colours and I can't choose my favourite.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 11:01 PM
–

I literally said this: "From going on a first date with someone, to giving birth to your youngest child can take up to and over a decade." Your youngest child is your last, not your first.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 11:19 PM
6

"Jumping straight to solutions won't help when a topic is purely emotional in nature" Nothing is purely emotional in nature, apart from neuroses, which is the domain of doctors. Friends support each other emotionally AND help solve problems. It's ALWAYS a trade off. Sometimes you DO have to be cruel to a friend in the short term to help them in the long term. Affirming a delusional, emotional friend even when you know they are wrong is not helping them, it's NOT being a good friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:42 PM
3

Or maybe, just maybe, men are...different. Men are just as capable of empathy, but express it differently. For me, the difference between men and women can be summed up by the adage, "give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime." In my experience, women want to help people immediately. They have lots of empathy, and that's a wonderful thing. They want to feed hungry people and soothe pain. Whereas men temper their empathy with more logic, p…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:27 PM
1

"so many women are having kids between 35-39." Never said they weren't. "also, saying that it takes a decade for a woman to give birth to her first child after meeting a guy seems a bit of an exaggeration" Never said that either. Please learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:55 AM
1

Wow, you didn't actually read my comment at all. Also, blatantly lying about statistics doesn't help your cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:28 AM
3

Kindness is not weakness. What a ridiculous premise. We are at the top of the food chain, the most successful species in the history of the planet, specifically because of our innate capacity for kindness. There's a difference between thinking you're being nice and actually just being weak. And there's a big difference between actually being nice, and "pretending to be nice until she let's me fuck her." "If a man is nice and asks her places she'd like and not "choose."" Women are attracted to ni…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:37 PM
2

This is such a ridiculous strawman. Nobody is saying women turn from supermodels to old hags in their late 20s. 'The wall' is not solely about attractiveness. It is about biological clocks. Nobody thinks marriage 'stops the aging process.' That is not at all what the topic is about. For a healthy relationship, people have to date for a while, then perhaps move in together, then get married, way before they start thinking about children. Marriage and starting a family is a huge deal, not decision…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 01:49 AM
2

I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:05 AM
1

Sure, OF has less coal dust. I have absolutely no idea what kind of 'gotcha' point you are trying to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 06:58 AM
37

"...because it’s wrong to see anyone as a piece of meat." Why? Have you ever stopped to ask yourself that? Why can't we just enjoy looking at good-looking people? Also, newsflash, a lot of people LIKE being seen as a piece of meat. How many women post bikini pictures because they want the validation and salivating male attention for how they look? How many gym dudes post flexing pics because they want the world to see their chiselled abs and bulging biceps? Why is it inherently a problem? It is …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 10:35 PM
3

Your "old, fat, single mothers, broke, unattractive" friends absolutely cannot get meaningful, loving, exclusive, committed relationships with "tall and attractive doctors and lawyers." No possible way. Can they easily find no-strings-attached, friends-with-benefits, situationships for regular sex? Sure! Plenty of men will sign up for that. No problem. But how many of those tall, attractive, rich doctors are marrying your old, fat, ugly, single mother friends? I think you have a skewed sense of …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 08:38 AM
9

Single women are happier than single men because a single life for a woman is still filled with human interactions. They have sales people being friendly to them, old ladies at bus stops talking to them about the weather, and they can easily get male attention and sex on the days where loneliness gets to them. Men can't. Single men are mostly invisible to society and it's real lonely down there. It's not the same experience at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 07:45 AM
10

I don't think the conclusion of "all women are the enemy" is what the world needs. Reddit isn't reality. The vocal group is skewed towards those having the most extreme opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 03:40 AM
6

While I don't agree with your extreme conclusion, you are correct that the comments are grotesque. Without any additional information, the people are accusing the husband of all kinds of things while lifting up OP as a pinnacle of virtue. It's insane. If the genders and politics were switched, that is, if it were a financially dependent woman not being allowed to use a more convenient pharmacy because of a poster of Biden, there would be a MAJOR outcry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 03:19 AM
2

Modern female beauty standards (incredibly slim with small hips and busts) are a result of more women and gay men taking control of fashion magazines and runways. In the old days when heterosexual men ran things, models were curvier.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 03:59 AM
18

Why don't men care about a woman's height, as passionately as women care about men's? Women can at least control their weight. I think the answer is because of evolved sexual preferences. A man's height is somewhat linked to his ability to provide and protect. As for woman's weight, most men would admit to liking some curves. Most men don't want stick insects. It's mostly women who create the pressure to be thin for other women though intrasexual competition and sabotage. Men are attracted to fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 10:26 AM
10

In many Western countries, men have been told constantly for many years that their innate sexuality and behaviour is toxic and unwanted. Shooting your shot in a gym incurs an enormous risk that it will be taken badly, no matter how politely delivered, and can result in either a ban and loss of membership, and/or online ridicule and assassination of character. Why on earth would a man approach a woman in such a situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 11:10 AM
–

"It feels cowardly to want the government to do your dirty work because you don’t want to face the potential consequences of asking your partner to prove that they haven’t cheated on you." This is not about me, or any one man. This is about society. Mandatory testing would eliminate the need for women like you to clutch your pearls, while saving countless people from very real and utterly unimaginable harm. You are against it because it is men who would benefit and women (the evil ones) would be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:43 PM
–

Mandatory paternity tests would completely eliminate the resentment women like you would feel. It would also save literally millions of men every year having their unbroken 4-billion year long genetic legacy murdered by a cheating woman. And it would save uncountable children from growing up with a false understanding of their own identity. It would put the right men on the hook for child support and take the wrong men off it. There is no excuse for being opposed to it. Not wanting the governmen…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 02:05 PM
3

Utterly and completely irrelevant. If paternity tests were a standard part of births, my parents would have just said, "yeah, as we figured," like most, but certainly not all couples. And if my mother had cheated on my father, she SHOULD have been exposed for it, and then I would have been able to find my biological father and learn about him, his family, and their medical histories as it would be pertinent to my life. The only people who oppose it are women who want to keep men from having the …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 09:46 AM
8

The most astounding aspect of this is not the COMPLETE lack of empathy women have for men, it's that they don't even care about their own children. Everyone should know who their parents are, not just because where someone comes from is an important part of their identity, but also for important biological reasons. If they need a kidney, or if they might be susceptible to genetic disorders later in life, things like that. They need to know who their biological father is, and his family, and any …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 02:37 AM
–

"Your understanding of consent is troubling." More deceitful derailing. I am merely highlighting your lack of understanding. You said any relationship, but now you want to impose limits. Good. Okay, now we agree that children can't consent. So, we have to have different laws for humans with different requirements. Okay, now let's address cannibalism. Can I cut off and eat my wife's leg if she consents?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:53 PM
–

"It is the negative liberty to consent to any relationship at will without interference." Oh, child marriage then. Polygamy/harems. Bestiality. Cannibalism. See where that deceitful line of argument gets you. There needs to be some limits, but we need to make things as fair as possible for groups with different requirements.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:38 PM
–

It literally is the same argument. Gay people have exactly the same right to marry someone of the opposite sex as everyone else. You claiming equal rights for two groups who have totally different requirements. Literally the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:34 PM
–

"Men and women have an equal right to evict someone else from their body." That is exactly the same argument against gay marriage. "Gay men have just the same right to marry a woman as straight men." It's a deceitful tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:30 PM
1

I am not in any way defending those kind of bullies, but men generally do prefer hard truths over comfortable lies. In a 2019 study, 59% of women said protecting free speech was less important than promoting an inclusive society, while 71% of men felt opposite. And in any group you will get bullies. Male bullies will use 'hard truths' as their cover, female bullies use 'sensitivity' as theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:40 PM
3

You specifically said men cannot love.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 06:10 AM
3

It's okay. You already made your point. As soon as my wife comes home, I will tell her that apparently I haven't loved her for decades, that I was just mistaken about my own feelings, and it took a random misandrist stranger on the internet before I could see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 02:04 AM
3

Oh, good to know. I guess I don't love my wife then, so I'll stop telling her I do. Thanks for letting me know the emotions I feel aren't real or valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 12:58 AM
4

"as if he is actually capable of love?" Wow, misandry much? Men are incapable of loving and being honest?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 12:38 AM
6

Lol! Your example of an 'invisible women' was a woman who wasn't seen by the man she liked. There are billions of those, male and female. But I will bet you a million dollars that she gets attention from other men around her though. That's not what this is about. Invisible men are not seen by anyone. An ugly women still gets talked to in society. She still exists. And old lady at a bus stop says, "nice weather today." A cheerful shop assistant asks her about her day. They get called 'beautiful' …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 11:51 PM
10

What can I say? People who use such slurs aren't the brightest.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 12:05 PM
7

Calling men "incels" is the equivalent of calling women "sluts."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:04 AM
8

Noooooooo. What level of evidence is required to be put on the list? He said/she said? Do photographs and video count as evidence in the age of undetectable AI faceswaps. How about a concerted 4chan effort to take down famous people with fabricated evidence? Misunderstandings happen. So does coercion and rape. If, say, a woman is drugged and taken advantage of at a party, and is photographed by her partner's friends being mauled, does she make the list? People are capable of changing. Sometimes …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 12:41 AM
2

I somewhat agree with you, however: The internet has made everyone lonelier. The world is more isolated than ever before, since people can get all their entertainment and sense of community from the internet, making it harder to meet people in real life. Lack of physical intimacy is a major part of the problem, that other men can't make up for. And the reason for it is because of online dating fostering a generation of women leaning into hypergamy. The average man is getting far less attention (…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 03:16 AM
1

Well, you are certainly allowed to feel however you want about your personal anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 02:59 AM
23

There is not a single man on the planet that is calling for both paper abortions AND for women to not be able to have abortions. When men talk of paper abortions, it is in response to the inequality of women being able to opt out of parenthood while men don't have a similar right. Those right wing men are saying we EITHER have full equality and the ability to give up children on both sides, OR we have a more traditional system with no abortion for women but men are forced at shotgun barrel to do…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 12:50 PM
6

"I honestly do not know how a man could expect a paper abortion." That's the problem. You don't (want to) understand the issue. Men aren't calling for a paper abortion because they want one. They are using it to point out the inequality in rights between women who can opt out of parenthood and men who can't. "Where is it illegal to get a paternity test?" France, for one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 11:41 AM
12

I have never heard a rational man (right wing or otherwise) call for a blanket end to child support. It is always within a more complex context of things like women having the right to abort, but men not having a right to a paper abortion, or men being on the hook for child support even when they were raped or are not the father, or with things like it being illegal in some places to get a paternity test, and other things of that ilk. It is never as simple as "men just want to stop child support…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 11:28 AM
38

What are you talking about? Right leaning men are usually quite vocal that men should 'man up,' and take responsibility for their sexuality and families? Do you think men like Peterson champion being a deadbeat father? You seem to be conflating "some men" and "right leaning men" for no reason. I'm a left-leaning man myself, but I do insist on people having consistent, coherent arguments, regardless of where they are on the political spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 10:45 AM
1

I'd also like it if a zeroth date were made standard before the more elaborate first date. A meet up in a coffee shop for an hour or so, in public, during the day, at very little cost. It would give people a chance to have a chat about expectations and worldviews, to see if that expensive, time consuming, energy consuming first date is even warranted in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 11:21 PM
32

"And you are the very woman whom this post is tailored to" I am a man, as my flair clearly states. See, that's exactly the problem. Unlike you, I can see things from other people's perspective. And if I were a woman approached by sexually frustrated, entitled, angry, aggressive arseholes like you, demanding my time, demanding my attention, demanding access to my body, damn right I would be thoroughly scared and would lie to get out of scary situations with you. You come across as creepy. Worse t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 12:21 AM
31

You sound exactly like the reason women have to be paranoid and careful and have fake boyfriends. Your entitlement to their attention and aggression at being rejected is what they are scared of. Men are bigger and stronger than women, and can do a lot of damage when the get out of control. While most men are decent, the really angry and unempathetic ones, such as yourself, are highly unpredictable, and women have ever right to be scared.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 12:12 AM
1

No, I would be happy if she fled. Self-preservation is 'hot.'
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:06 AM
4

This is misogynistic and misandrist at the same time. Well done!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:14 PM
1

I very much doubt the video added his perspective, so you only have her word when she says she was up front about her intentions. I don't think many gold-diggers state up front they are only in it for the money and will leave if the money stops flowing. Maybe they do, what do I know? Bad things can happen in life. People can lose their jobs or get sick. The point of a relationship is that you weather the storms together. However, if she explicitly stated, "I am ONLY with you for your money and w…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 07:43 AM
4

Yeah, that sounds about right. Provoking people with silly posts, then taking people out of context to pretend they are bigots.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 10:27 AM
8

Sigh. I wasn't saying masturbation is wrong, I was trying to follow your (il)logic. If sex requires two people then using a sex doll is not sex either. Right? Please answer my question about fleshlights. Are you for them in the same way that you are for vibrators?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 03:52 AM
62

Another troll post Windmill? "Because sex was meant to be between HUMANS." 'Inb4 "hurr no different from vibrators"' I'd like to see you explain how it is different from vibrators. If sex should be between humans, masturbation is wrong. And if masturbation is wrong, vibrators (that have no other function) must be wrong. Which one is it? Do you feel the dolls are different to fleshlights? You can't be anti-fleshlight if you are pro-vibrator. Right? At least these sex dolls are respecting the whol…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 03:40 AM
–

Why are women attracted to strong/tall men? The answer is that evolution baked it into the genes of our ancestors because that attraction was beneficial to their offspring. Evolution discovers simple mechanisms that promote behaviours that increase the likelihood of reproduction. The reason men are attracted to purity (or rather, repulsed by female promiscuity) comes from the simple fact than they have no guarantee of paternity. A promiscuous female is far more likely to carry another male's off…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 10:58 AM
5

"Men should enter a bad lifelong contract because women need money for their superficial hobbies." Wow, at least you're open and up front with your opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 04:35 AM
1

"a rope wont stop us we can undo nots" and about 3000 likes.. like its not really a joke?" That very much was a joke. Not particularly funny, but a joke nonetheless. Dark humour involves saying something so outlandishly wrong that most people (not you apparently) know it's obviously a joke, and can have a safe cathartic laugh about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 02:38 PM
1

I agree, and it works both ways. I have seen so many women furious with men who say they won't get married because they don't want to share their resources, or run the risk of having the results of their hard work taken from them in the event of a divorce. Society as a whole seems to feel entitled to women's nurturing and men's provision. I think it comes from deeply innate biological biases PLUS deeply-ingrained gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 03:38 PM
11

This has the same energy as 'non-white people can't be racist.'
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 03:27 PM
19

I see from your post history you are a guy with an impregnation fetish. Troll rating: 1/10
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 10:06 PM
4

Hormones are not an excuse. Also, men have waaaaaaaaaay more to lose from paternity fraud than a woman has from her guy cheating. I'm not excusing cheating from anyone, I am simply calling you out for for your tribalistic hypocrisy. Men have hormones too. You can't use them as an excuse for shitty behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 01:04 AM
–

LOL! It's got nothing to do with "backdoors," and nothing to do with misogyny. You seem like the person who blames men for literally everything. You overslept, patriarchy! You tripped on a pavement crack, misogyny! Your coffee is too weak, that evil man in Starbucks is out to get you!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 10:36 PM
2

No, you specifically linked to her video as an example of "these victims basically justifying Passport Bros behavior" Don't lie!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 01:56 AM
2

That's the second time you have accused me of saying something I didn't say and don't believe, even after I explicitly told you. I NEVER SAID THERE AREN'T PREDATORY MEN!!!!! I was pointing out the specific bigotry and hypocrisy of the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 01:53 AM
7

I never said there aren't predatory men out there. I was calling out the bigotry of assuming a seemingly intelligent and articulate woman is uneducated and weak simply because she is defending men from blanket misandry and defending non-American women from that exact kind of bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 07:23 AM
14

Ooof. It turns out I have downvoted a number of her bad take posts. I'll watch out for that username in the future. Hehe
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:17 AM
15

OP was criticising a specific woman and saying that she must have been forced to say those things. Do you think the particular woman in that video is uneducated, poor, or desperate? Yes or no.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:13 AM
13

Ah that explains it. Cheers! Hard to tell the trolls from the idiots these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:08 AM
73

"These girls often are undereducated, poor, and don't speak English well" This is literally the exact bigotry the woman in the video is specifically calling out.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:57 AM
16

I suspect you're trolling with this cope, but if not: HMVs want their own children. Single mothers are bringing another man's baggage to the table. Some predatory men date single mothers they put in the "fuck but not get serious" category. They see single mothers as desperate and with baggage that means they won't/can't get too clingy. Most men want to spend their resources on their own genetic lineage. Some men will happily raise a child that isn't theirs, but they are the exception, not the ru…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:56 PM
26

If I said "men are taller than women," would you agree? On the one hand, there are very tall women out there and very short men, so the statement is demonstrably not true in all cases. However, the mean of male height is greater than the mean of female height, so it is demonstrably true on average. True and not true at the same time. It all depends on context and perspective. If the context was 'shall we lower the basket for women's basketball?' we should probably be talking about the average he…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:26 AM
2

Yes, there is. In most first world countries it has been illegal to pay women less for the same work for decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:54 PM
11

Failure works both ways. A woman getting offended at a straightforward question about equity in a relationship is a huge red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:11 PM
11

An ideal answer would be similar to what I would answer. My useful skills, my (vague) financial situation, my perceived positive personality traits like patience and punctuality, my ability to fix and build things, my ability to cook, etc. Those are all things that are potentially good for a relationship. "most women end the date right there at that question." If I went for an interview and they asked me, "what can you bring to this company," I wouldn't get offended and storm out. I would answer…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:56 PM
11

See title: when dating, the burden should be on males to prove themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:46 PM
7

Because I'm not the one being asked it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:45 PM
17

Something other than "I am the table"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:29 PM
18

"There isn't pay parity. The gender pay gap exists" No it doesn't. An earnings gap exists because men work longer hours in more dangerous/difficult jobs. If the pay gap existed, there would be a lot more suing for illegal discrimination going on and very few men would have a jobs. "If he is to be the co-leader of a future household, he needs to prove that he's up to the job." So why doesn't she have to prove her abilities to him at the same time, if an equal relationship is desired? "If it was s…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:24 PM
49

Sure, that works for a traditional/unequal relationship, it doesn't work in a world of equality. Why should men pay for everything when there is pay parity? Why does a man have to prove his leadership to a woman who doesn't want to be led? Can't have it both ways. "What do you bring to the table?" is a simple, straightforward question to determine if a relationship is going to be one-sided and exploitative or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:15 PM
–

A long time ago, when women couldn't work, the idea of "his money is our money" was the only idea society had because women didn't have money. Now, we have equality laws. The woman in that video is trying to have the best of both worlds. She wants the traditional concept of having men pay for everything AND the modern concept of women having equality when it comes to work. Basically, she's a selfish, entitled moron that no man wants, and she is making TikTok videos trying to sabotage other women…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:29 PM
–

Did you just unironically say all women are trash? That would make you a sexist arse, wouldn't it? I'm a man and I don't think "women are trash." I judge every single issue on its own merits. Sometimes the man is in the wrong, and sometimes it's the woman. I call out arseholes for being arseholes, regardless of their identity. I don't go in for blanket bigotry. "Never blame men" is as stupid and evil as "believe all women." They assume one sex can do no wrong, which is obviously bollocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:18 PM
2

It is extra since other women don't have those additional 'fees.' You're either stupid or trolling to have written that Your children are of course precious angels to you, but to a man trying to date you, they are external baggage. Of course men are capable of empathy, but it doesn't mean they are suckers Assuming you are not trolling, you are never going to find a good man who is willing to take over another man's burden because of your disgustingly entitled attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 12:05 AM
20

Only a very desperate man would agree to those requirements. Why would man pay extra to date a woman with baggage?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:50 PM
1

This is the best comment on this whole thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:03 AM
3

Yes. There are three facts that make me doubt the assertion that women earning less money (overall) is due to systemic sexism: It has been illegal to pay women less for the same job (in the US) for over 60 years and most developed nations have similar laws. There would be way more women suing if companies were actively discriminating Companies have an incentive to pay workers less, which would lead to women taking all the jobs For decades, there has been a strong push to get women into higher pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:43 AM
2

The fact that all around the world, independent cultures almost exclusively had women looking after children, keeping the house, while the men go off to till the fields and hunt the buffalo.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 12:59 PM
2

What on earth are you talking about? I have taught evolution at university level, I think I know how it works. You clearly don't. We didn't evolve out of all biases just because of modern society.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 11:13 AM
5

Humans are not blank slates solely defined by culture, as you are suggesting. Women have a nesting instinct that men generally don't have. However, it's not all nature either. We are a mix of nature AND nurture, with women being inherently better (in general) at some things and men being inherently better (in general) at others. That doesn't mean people are fixed to a particular role, but it does mean statistically we shouldn't expect parity in all areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 09:44 AM
3

Humans are not a specific type of bird. There is a danger in taking the wrong lessons from biology. Different species evolved different strategies. You can only compare in a general sense, and of course, there are going to be exceptions to every rule. The birds you cite, the females are bigger than the males. That's their strategy. Mostly, when males are bigger than females it's because of intraspecies competition. Human males are bigger than females. Not as extreme as elephant seals and gorilla…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 01:07 AM
3

So you do know that. Well that includes things like emotional support, sex, friendship, and love.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 09:25 AM
5

You seem to be using 'transactional' to mean 'financial' in a strict sense. That's fine, but that's not how other people use it in this context. When people talk about transactional relationships, they mean both parties getting something of value out of it, it doesn't necessarily have to be money.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 09:10 AM
1

"how can anyone claim to know the psychology of people who’ve theyve never met" What a absolutely ridiculous strawman. No evolutionary psychologist would claim that human behaviour is 100% nature, but you seem to be under the delusion that it is 100% nurture. "Evolutionary psych ‘experiments’ cant be reproduced" The contents of a black hole, or Theia smashing into proto-Earth to create the moon, can't be reproduced either, it doesn't make physics not a science. What a ridiculously stupid critici…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:53 PM
1

"I want everyone in society to be equal so I will ignore any science that explores our evolutionary differences."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:23 PM
2

Sure, you keep spouting that drivel
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:05 AM
1

Meaningless? Ha! Evolution shaped us. We ARE the product of that evolution. Of course modern society is more complex than any environment we evolved in, but we are that still that same evolved ape navigating a modern complex culture that we created. It's not 'meaningless.' It's THE answer. The men you are disparaging are awkwardly trying to understand their own complex evolved feelings, and those of women, with respect to modern society. Women ARE, in general, highly attracted to strength, wealt…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:32 AM
4

Sexual attraction evolved because it was beneficial to reproduction. Males evolved to be attracted to females that displayed outward signs of fertility and of being a good nurturer for possible offspring. Females are attracted to males that are 'more successful' in reproduction than other men. That involves traits like physical strength, charisma, ingenuity, and creativity. Since traits are inherited, a reproductively successful man will more than likely sire reproductively successful sons that …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:37 AM
2

Not personally, no. However, I would say that it is the equivalent of women requiring men pay on dates. When women say that, they are ascertaining how financially secure a man is and how generous he may be towards her. She is testing his capacity to provide. If a man requires a woman to cook, he is testing her capacity to support. I don't subscribe to the more traditional roles of dating, but I don't frown on those that do. If a woman and man both agree that the man should provide and the woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:41 PM
1

Well done, I think that is probably the stupidest comment I have ever read. How the fuck can a relationship be 'meaningful' if it's not desired? Are you saying women should be forced to be in a relationship? Should women be chattel again?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:32 AM
1

I think an averagely attractive woman can get (explicit and implicit) offers of sex simply by existing. The paradox for her is that (most women) want more than just sex with a random dude. They are usually looking for (the possibility of) a deeper connection, so all these offers will come across as icky. So I think finding a meaningful relationship for a woman is as hard as it is for men to find casual sex. It's not impossible, but it's difficult. Men are often jealous of women's ability to get …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 11:07 PM
2

Ah, ok. Well since you asserted this: "Men criticize the framing only for women, not men" Let's have your receipts first. You know, to show me what level of evidence you will accept. And remember, proof that ALL men criticize the framing only for women, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:17 AM
2

A sexist statement. People are rightly called out whenever they are misogynistic OR misandrist. You seem to focus on when men are arseholes, but totally ignore when women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:40 AM
2

"And since we answer, we get to choose the framing and intent" Sure, but you don't get a free pass if your framing is misandrist. "If a dad says “now that I have a daughter, I hate all men”" And you would have been right to call out his misandry, but I bet you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:15 AM
3

The problem with the "man or bear" question is that women are answering emotionally. It's the same as when they say things like "I am the table" or "I'm a 10." They're not being literal, and they know it, and they know that everyone else knows it, they are basing their answers on how they want to be perceived by the audience. By saying bear, they want men to implicitly realise they are saying men can be dangerous, and they are looking for other women to slap them on the back and say, "yay, sista…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:44 PM
6

I see your response is the same copy/pasted response you're spamming to a lot of commenters, but it's fine. To your first point, I see you completely agree with me. I specifically said "older guys" and "guys with kids" are available to "single mothers" for "good relationships." And to your last point, you are again proving my point. If high-quality men in their 30s are rare, women who have kids are at a huuuuge disadvantage against those without. You seem to be confused as to what point you're a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:36 AM
3

In these kinds of discussion, you have to distinguish between "just sex," and "long-term, committed, exclusive relationship." A single mother can find sex just by going outside and smiling at passing men if she wanted to, but for them to find a high-quality man for a high-quality relationship is like finding a unicorn. Men who are good looking, tall, financially secure, and fertile, are obviously going to favour younger and more attractive women who don't have kids because they will have that op…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:14 AM
1

Predators are as predators do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:28 PM
8

The label 'feminist' isn't enough to tell anything about a person. It can range to people who agree with the core tenet that women deserve equal rights, to a screechy, misandrist, blue-haired, attention-seeking gender-studies student. Look at the difference between someone like Christina Hoff Sommers and the third/fourth wave children who criticise her. They all accept the label of feminist, but they have very different views on what that means and how society should be. So, I would have to ask …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:55 AM
1

Your lack of comprehension must be intentional. If a woman felt unsafe she deserves sympathy for someone who felt unsafe. If a woman was raped, she gets MORE sympathy for that, because feeling unsafe and being raped are qualitatively different experiences. I called OP a "professional victim" for trying to get the SAME amount of sympathy as someone who did suffer real bodily harm, a selfish tactic which ultimately harms victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:08 AM
1

No, a threat of violence is not violence, it is a threat of violence. Why is that difficult to understand? We ALL have sympathy for real victims of actual violence, and threats of violence, and coercion, and every other negative experience. But words have meaning and lose those meanings if you apply them to ANY situation. You can't say someone who was threatened with a punch in the face was actually punched in the face. No doubt their experience was awful, but they weren't physical harmed. You a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 01:54 AM
1

"You’re using semantics to undermine the experience of sexual violence." OMG, did you really just say that? You seem to have zero comprehension of what this discussion is about. At no point have I tried to undermine sexual violence. What the hell are you talking about? "Sort of like how a “violent crime” doesn’t mean that I actually touched anyone in the commission of my crime." Yes, it is, it literally means that. Someone uttering "I'm going to rape you!" is a direct, threat of sexual violence.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 01:27 AM
3

I did. violence/ˈvʌɪələns/noun behaviour involving PHYSICAL force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:58 PM
1

Agreed. Still not ACTUAL violence, which is the topic here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:56 PM
3

violence/ˈvʌɪələns/noun behaviour involving PHYSICAL force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something being groped on the train = sexual violence molested by a baby sitter = sexual violence being raped = sexual violence bosses who constantly hit on you and promise promotions for sexual favors = coercion/blackmail being catcalling = coercion/aggressively advertising "And to say someone is the “perpetual victim” or “attention seeking” for labeling it as such, means that you’re trying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:55 PM
1

Catcalling itself is aggressive advertising, not a threat. And when it is done within a group of men, it is posturing. It is NOT the same as physical violence. Yes, men who are prone to catcalling may indeed ALSO be violent, but they are not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:44 PM
21

Calling catcalling and unsolicited compliments "sexual violence" is grossly diluting the word and doing a very real disservice to victims of actual sexual violence. While I am sure it's not nice to be in the receiving end, conflating it with physical violation and bodily harm makes you seem like a fragile attention-seeker and professional victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:32 PM
1

"We know we are shitty" I suspect you are trying to say, "we men know that some other men are shitty," but that is not what you said. You are admitting to you, yourself, being a sexual predator by the second usage of the word 'we' in that sentence, and in the context provided. I am a man and you DON'T speak for me. I'm not a sexual predator and I abhor those that are. This is a fundamental problem of society letting people get away with saying "group X is [bad]." "men are shitty", "women are lia…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 01:35 AM
1

I have been married for decades. Your response suggests that you can't have a mature discussion about these kinds of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 01:20 AM
5

It's a universal thing. Men have a bias towards purity as an evolutionary mechanism because of the simple fact they have no guarantee of paternity. This preference manifest in different ways in different cultures, but it's most certainly not a parochial, American thing. Dragonfly males evolved to scoop out sperm from previous mates to solve the problem, humans males evolved a high degree of sexual jealousy and preference for purity.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 03:38 AM
–

It literally is gay. You don't need anyone's permission to be gay. Go be gay, go on, have fun, kiss all the boys you find cute. Go nuts, so to speak. We're happy for you dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 04:16 AM
1

It's not, it's perfectly rational, but it's antithetical to the feminist ideal of equal pay for the sexes (as a whole). If, in a perfect feminist utopia, there was true parity of income between the sexes, then as some women date 'upward' (financially) it will necessitate an equal number of women settling 'downward.' And if women are genetically programmed for hypergamy, then those latter relationships, and therefore society as a whole, will suffer. The problem is that, in the West especially, wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:38 PM
1

How the hell is it a pronoun? You have specifically stated that sexuality and gender are different, and here you are conflating the two. Get your story straight. Calling gay people 'gays' is dehumanising, just like calling black people 'blacks' or white people 'whites.'
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:27 PM
1

Using 'gay' as a noun, yikes!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:17 PM
4

Pearl Davis is not a pickme, she is a grifter. Big difference. She knows she can get a large male audience by saying things they want to hear. And like all grifters in the dating space, a lot of the things she says are true, as scaffolding for the shit she wants to pedal. She's single by choice. She could easily have her pick of her red-pilled audience if she wanted. For contrast, watch a Pearl video, then watch a Karen Straughan to see the difference. One is grifter, the other a compassionate, …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:32 PM
10

We either have a traditional society where women don't work, and men have to take care of them, or we have a progressive one where women and men are considered equal and share all responsibility. Some greedy, tribalistic, ideological people want to cherry pick all the aspects that benefit them from such systems, and not take the parts that balance them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 11:07 PM
1

It's EXACTLY the same as a poor woman wanting a rich man. Men evolved to be attracted to youth and purity because there is a greater chance of her not being 'tainted' by another man's sperm, and she has greater chance of reproductive success with his child. Women evolved to be attracted to men who are capable of supporting and protecting her while she is vulnerable with child. I don't see a man wanting a relatively inexperienced woman or a woman wanting a financially stable man to be examples of…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 11:22 PM
5

"Give me the biggest portion of the cake because I want it and I'm better than you." You seem to be arguing for traditionalism. Women have inherent biological value because of their wombs, men literally can't give their sperm away. In traditional relationships where men paid for everything, women had qualities/expectations that men worked hard to attain the privilege of marrying. But in modern society, that dynamic isn't valid any more. Society can either have a traditional system OR a modern on…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 11:41 PM
1

These AI bots are getting weirder.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:02 AM
5

It's because of the difference in reproductive roles. Females carry babies, so they know a baby carries their genes, but males have no such guarantee. This simple fact is the root of most issues in human dating. The more promiscuous a woman is (or was) the more likely she is to carry anther man's child. And it is genetic suicide for a man to devote all his time, energy and resources helping to raise and protect another man's DNA. Of course, I am not talking about modern society. Many men are alt…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 10:55 PM
–

Do you want you son (hypothetically, if you don't have one) to become say, a garbage man, or a sewage worker, or a logger (occupation with most job fatalities)? Yes or no. If you say no, you must be anti those industries, according to your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:31 AM
–

No you didn't. You seem to be changing the discussion from "men who enjoy porn," to "men who consume porn and also actively disparage porn stars." First of all, that wasn't in your original post, and second, it still doesn't support your point. You claim the garbage man analogy is not valid, but don't seem to be able to refute it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:22 AM
–

I suspect you don't want your son to be a road-sweeper, but you like the fact that there are men who sweep roads. I doubt you are anti-sewage systems, anti-oil-rigs, and anti-military, despite liking the fact that all those things exist and the vast majority of their workers are male, while simultaneously not wanting the men in your life to work there.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 11:55 PM
–

"See and that's where yall men are wrong. A ladies worth, and mate status isn't defined by a man or even based on a man's sexual attraction to younger women." In the dating market, IT IS! Attraction is an inherent attribute, it's your desirability to other people. Other people define it. OF COURSE people's overall value is more than just their value on the dating market, but the value on the dating market is currently what we're talking about. "But you're not an obgyn, or even know a woman's rep…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 11:15 PM
–

"How would you know the wall is real, if you don't know exactly what it is, or what it feels like to "hit it"" The wall is not an experience a woman has, like menopause. It is the limiting of potential mate status decided by men who evolved to be attracting to younger women because of their greater ability to gestate. "Plus why assume a woman's 20s is reserved for baby making" Because that's when she's most fertile and her body is most suitable for making babies. I SPECIFICALLY said if people do…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:10 PM
0

"The difference is how youth is valued between the sexes is of degree, not kind." Yes, that's what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 03:37 AM
1

That's a very interesting point. Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 04:13 AM
6

"You don't understand fertility " No, you have very little comprehension ability. I LITERALLY had a paragraph on the decrease in male fertility. And I never said women can't have children in their late 30s because that is a completely pointless strawman you made up. Also, I don't care about your anecdotes. My post was talking about the average fertility of men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 04:06 AM
7

"if a guy doesnt workout/eats right/takes care of himself his sperm becomes shit?" Not at all relevant to my comment. Of course people who don't take care of themselves are less healthy. "thats well before the men hit 30." Your country must be irradiating its men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 03:21 AM
21

You are missing the key ingredient: Fertility. In order to address this issue, we have to create two categories. People who are dating with the goal of getting married and having children, and those that don't want kids. For the former category, "The Wall" is very real for women. Objectively speaking, why would a marriage/family-minded man want to date a woman in her 30s? A woman's fertility begins dropping at the age of 32 and has a sharp decrease. By 40, her fertility is a fraction of what it …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:25 PM
2

The first date shouldn't be an expensive dinner. It doesn't make sense any more. It should be a simple coffee date during the day in a public place, the purpose of which is to see if there is any reason for the two strangers to go for dinner. The cheap coffee date is to weed out clearly incompatible people and not waste time/money. Nobody wants to be stuck for a few hours eating a meal with someone who is obviously not a potential partner (for whatever reason), especially if they are being expec…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:49 AM
3

In the age of AI, authenticity will be the highest value currency. People will seek out excitement with real people because it's not just about the images or text, there is a large mental/emotional component to it too, a desperate need for connection with people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:12 AM
3

We evolved to live on the cusp of monogamy/polygamy. Being monogamous has a lot of advantages, such as deep bonding and a solid, consistent, dependable, accessible partner, but it's not the best from a genetic standpoint for either sex. From a purely evolutionary fitness perspective (our selfish genes), it's better not to put all your eggs in one basket, so to speak. It's best to mix your DNA with a variety of other individuals, to maximise the chances of part of 'you' surviving long into the fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:32 AM
5

Nobody is forcing you to do anything, but if you want to have success on the dating market, you do need to look as clean and decent as you can, just like men. Men have to shave, wear stylish clothes, look after their skin and hair, go to a gym, etc. Men need to look appealing too. Do you require a man to wear a tailored Armani suit to a date? If not, is it possible that a man doesn't require you to buy expensive branded makeup? Men evolved to be attracted to female traits that hint at a woman's …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 10:28 AM
4

Agreed. I see a lot of arguments that could be solved by people actually understood the meanings of words like general, specific, average, and extreme.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 09:30 AM
2

Yes, everyone has a right to know who their actual parents are, and who their actual children are. Such knowledge is VITALLY important because of things like heritable diseases and possible organ donation. That is indisputable. The ONLY people arguing against mandatory paternity tests are women who cheat, or tribalistic women who feel it's a loss for their side if women can't deceive men at the expense of their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 12:09 AM
–

Yes, of course we should take people's lived experience into account, especially when talking about subjective issues, but it doesn't necessarily mean people are the most qualified to decide issues about their group merely by being a member of it. The answer is, it all depends on the people, the issue, and the context. If a woman is an expert on testicular cancer, then I would take her advice more than I would take the advice of a random man. A male gynaecologist is more qualified to talk about …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 12:36 PM
1

The rigid definition of what is 'masculine' and 'feminine' is the problem. 'Masculine' doesn't mean 'emotionless' and 'feminine' doesn't mean 'weak.' People are a mix of traits. A man why cries is no less a man than one who has been taught not to. A woman who can change a tyre herself is no less a woman than a feeble princess.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 01:53 PM
6

Patriarchies are the result of one simple biological fact: men have no guarantee of paternity. It's that simple. When humans created primitive societies, the men that had power were able to ensure their paternity by treating women as chattel and keeping them protected from contact with other men. As societies got more complex and developed things like chiefs and kings, they gained so much power they could have vast harems and concubines, protected/served/guarded by women and eunuchs. It all stem…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 09:07 AM
–

Women uplift their friends as a way of bonding, men ridicule their friends. "Hey, have you seen the new Batman movie, it's cool?" "What? You like DC? Ha! What a loser!" "You saying Marvel is better? Oof, cringe!" "Fancy a beer, ya prick?" "Only if you get the first round, you tosser!" The problem is when men who don't have much experience with women try to put them at ease by treating them like one of the guys. A lot of women think men like that are guilty of misogyny and disrespect when in fact…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 10:56 AM
20

There is a big difference between a women who has a low body count because of self-respect, and a women who has a low body-count because of social awkwardness and a bad personality. Men want a confident, stable, kind, interesting women who has great self-respect and takes relationships seriously. Are you that kind of woman? Because it sounds like you aren't. Calling men "incels" and "chads" and calling other women "hoes" doesn't make you seem like a stable, compassionate, wife-material woman. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 05:07 AM
2

Totally agree. Another important reason (other than the possibility of a man being on the hook for a child that isn't his) is that every human has the right to know who their biological parents are. Such knowledge is important as it allows people to know if they are prone to certain genetic issues, and to get tested for them as soon as possible. Also, people need to know what genetic issues they may be passing on to their own children. A person who thinks a man is their biological father who act…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 08:46 AM
–

So basically, your mother's selfish infidelity ended your (non-biological) father's unbroken 3.7-billion-year lineage.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 08:39 AM
1

The time I was accused of 'mansplaining' is when I was trying to lay down a comprehensive foundation for the entire team, systematically explaining everything so that everybody was completely up to date and nobody was working on any assumptions (because assumptions is where errors happen). And because I repeated things that a particular woman already knew (but others didn't) she accused me of mansplaining to her. None of men to whom I reiterated things they already knew complained, in fact, they…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 04:34 AM
1

Wow! You need to be on a watch list!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 01:54 AM
36

Totally agree. This is the reverse of when moronic women say, "men can't be sexually abused." Of course sexual abuse is a far greater issue for women, but it is still something that some men have faced. Loneliness mostly affects men because there are far fewer support structures for them, and they are by default seen as stoic, threatening, and emotionally absent. All my life I have railed against the idiocy of people confusing the general with the specific: "In general group A suffers more than …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 01:02 AM
14

Doesn't that make her exploitation of him even more disgusting?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 11:48 PM
0

I was with you up until your conclusion was, "Waugh! It's all men's fault." Are women are hypergamous because some men are insecure, or are those men insecure because of women's innate propensity towards hypergamy. Or is it a bit of both? Your conclusion is, "nope, men bad."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 03:41 AM
–

I somewhat agree with this. When women give each other general life advice, they are supportive and kind, but when they give dating advice, it's often so moronic and two-faced, I sometimes think they are saying it to sabotage the listener's chance of happiness. Things like, "flirt with other men to make him jealous," and "dump men who don't put you on a pedestal," and "every women is a 10," and "men who suggest a coffee date or ice-cream in the park, rather than an expensive restaurant, for a fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 07:53 AM
1

This all comes down to how you view the men you are attracting. You want to look sexy because you want to attract men you are attracted to you. But you don't want to attract men you are not attracted to. So you look for a way to justify it and turn that around to blame men for it. "Only sexy men should respond to my sexiness!" You've use a lot of words but you still haven't clearly communicated how being sexy (good) is different from being sexualised (bad).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:19 AM
7

Giving someone flowers is nice, but if you say "You'd better fucking take these flowers or I'll beat the shit out of you!", well, that's not so nice. It sounds like that man has a very narrow view of humanity and their roles. He thinks he is being nice, but being too strict with it makes him the arsehole.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 04:05 AM
10

Difficult to say without more information. It could be that she is looking for a traditional, strong provider, or she might be looking for a chump to exploit. It may mean, "be romantic, be supportive, and be my rock when life gets turbulent." Or it could mean, "simp for me and buy me stuff to stop me moving on to the next sucker."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 12:09 PM
1

We need more confident men, not sassy. Perhaps we have a different idea of what that word means.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 12:31 AM
–

We are a sexually dimorphic species and the different sexes have different desires and needs (in general). On the other hand, there is quite a lot variety and overlap within and between the sexes. So we should embrace that. We should strive for a society where all people are as free as possible to follow their dreams, and not try to fit people into boxes that are either totally separate, or totally the same. Some things related to sex will never be equal, but we should strive to make things as e…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 03:11 PM
1

Every single online dating app is specifically incentivised to keep their users single. Obviously. It is not in their interest to match anyone with someone to whom they can commit to in a monogamous, loving relationship. Of course dating is going to shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 11:20 AM
1

Sure: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_871-1
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 08:39 AM
6

Women (understandably) have zero empathy for this, because if a woman raises a child who doesn't have her DNA it is always by choice. The mammalian females of our ancestral species never had to worry about 'cuckoos' and so never evolved any mental mechanism against it. Males did have to worry about it. Males developed things like sharp sexual jealousy because they have no guarantee of paternity. The patriarchies we see all over the world in primitive cultures, and religions where female sexualit…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 01:04 AM
1

The answers to all your questions boil down to a single thing: males and females have vastly different roles in reproduction. The cost of reproduction for women is incredibly high, but they have a solid guarantee that the child is theirs. The cost of reproduction for men is basically zero, but they have no guarantee of paternity. So pretty much all major differences between men and women, both physiologically and psychologically, stem from this concept. They evolved in order to facilitate reprod…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 07:00 AM
61

There should be no filming in gyms, male or female. It's a distraction in a hazardous place and an invasion of other people's privacy. 'Influencers' are more than welcome to film themselves working out at home.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 12:31 AM
-2

Sure. But how does that refute my anwser?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:14 PM
3

So, basically your whole argument to "why do women have a wall at 30?" is "well men should have a wall too." Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:13 PM
1

How does this line of thinking rationalise the contributions that women have made? Do men get the credit for all the works of art and scientific contributions made by women, because women only did it in order to get into men's pants? Or were they all made by lesbians?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:01 PM
4

Female fertility drops rapidly after the age of 32 and the probability of a genetic disorder increases rapidly. Usually, when a man and woman gets married, they would like to have children together. Having children is not always an easy thing. Some couples try for a long time before getting pregnant and sometimes there are gut-wrenching miscarriages. Years can tick by before a child appears. So if a man is genuinely looking to date with the hopes of marrying a wonderful woman and having multiple…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 11:49 AM
2

"Mandatory paternity tests force individuals to act against the choice they think is best for themselves." What does this mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 11:09 AM
1

And on the other hand, it will be easy to determine the baby's real father and hold HIM accountable instead of a man who should have no obligation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 11:02 AM
6

Again with the false equivalencies. Domestic violence and paternity fraud are incomparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 10:51 AM
2

The problem with your calculation is that it is the man's money that is obtained by fraud, not the government's. In fact, it's saving the government money. It's not in the government's interest to spend their money protecting men from being defrauded.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 09:51 AM
12

What an absurd analogy. Killing some is illegal, having an affair is not. Cheating happens orders of magnitude more than murder. Infidelity is far far far easier to hide than murder. If there was a simple, inexpensive, no side-effect test to prove someone isn't a murderer, every man who has nothing to hide would happily take it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 09:40 AM
-3

To me, it's like the fire-and-brimstone anti-LGBT preachers who are eventually caught with in a seedy motel with a rent boy. The more extreme a response, the more guilty the party. A woman who would knee-jerkingly divorce her husband and rip children away from their father just because he asked for a paternity test almost certainly has something to hide. This is a problem of biology. Men have no guarantee of paternity, and if wrong, it is the literal murder of a 4 billion year old, continuous li…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 07:27 AM
1

That's like asking someone to come in for a job interview, telling them how great it is to work there, and how much of a good fit you think they'll be, and then at the end laughing at them and saying, "you didn't really think you were going to get a job here, did you?" You're trying to justify your wilful teasing of people to satisfy your desperate need for attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 02:11 AM
1

This boils down to biology. Males and females of our species are made of the same DNA with just a bit of tweaking, so our emotions are mostly the same, but there are subtle differences. Males have no guarantee of paternity, and so evolution 'solved' this by making males jealous of sex. For females, that's not an issue. However, females rely on the resources of males while vulnerable with young and therefore emotional bonding is the solution evolution came up with for that. A male will give his r…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 09:43 AM
12

A doctor gets paid for treating the sick, but it doesn't mean they don't have empathy and a passion for healing. Two things can be true at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 07:17 AM
2

Sex is easy for women to get, and difficult for men to get. A woman being promiscuous is seen as lazy and gluttonous, whereas a man doing so is evidence of overcoming a real challenge. Why men slut-shame promiscuous women: Men have no guarantee of paternity. It is lineage murder for a man to pour all his energy, emotion, and resources into unknowingly raising another man's DNA in lieu of his own. Evolution mitigated this problem by giving men a vague disgust of promiscuous women. Why women slut-…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:40 PM
2

The obvious rebuttal to the strawberries analogy is vetting. Don't blindly eat strawberries one after another if you know a few might be toxic. Take one and test it thoroughly before you pop it in your mouth. The same is true for dating, for both men AND women. Don't blindly let people into your life without truly knowing something about them. Don't put yourself into a vulnerable situation on a first date with a stranger off the internet. Yes it's true that some evil people can mask and hide the…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 03:22 AM
24

It's one half of the coin. If you are a chef and you want to make yummy food, ask another chef how to make yummy food, and ask diners what makes food yummy to them. Similarly, if you are an A looking to date a B, ask other A's how to attract B's, AND ask B's what they look for in As. If you only listen to people like Andrew Tate, then you are going to have a very hard time finding someone with whom you can have a healthy relationship. On the other hand, if you only ask women, again, you'll only …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 01:37 AM
2

This "treat him/her like a king/queen" thing leaves a really nasty taste in my mouth. I'm sure the meaning behind it is benign, but it just sounds creepy to me. My wife and I just have a normal relationship. We don't pathetically grovel at each other's feet, and we don't abuse each other. We have a nice relationship like the adults we are. I treat her as "the human I'm in love with," and she treats me the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 01:11 AM
1

"That's right, they choose the 5 foot guy over the 6 foot guy." The problem with your argument is it assumes dating is like a buffet, where all the men are lined up with little plaques explaining how much they earn and other stats, and then women come along and select based on all knowledge about them. It's not how it works. What happens is that people are sexually attracted to looks first, and then learn about the details of someone later. So, for example, short men never even get the opportuni…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:11 AM
4

There are two basic flaws with this premise: You are infantalising women by saying they are all stupid and not sexually liberated You are claiming that no woman has ever strung a man along in order to get what she wants
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 12:25 AM
1

No. I think men (and women) should just get on with their lives, being decent people by balancing their wants and needs with the needs of society, and seeking out their own path through life. I don't think people should strive to fit into little boxes and be labelled. Labelling is limiting and tribalistic. And I completely disagree with your usage of the word 'bland.' A person who makes their entire identity/persona about their hobby or fashion or niche interest is very very bland.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 11:37 PM
1

Women like men with experience for the same reason men like women without it. It's biological, and deeply innate. A male with no experience has been unselected by other women (for whatever reason). He has been deemed by consensus to be unfit. So why the hell would a female want to go through all the pain and burden of raising his children who would not be competitive? It makes biological sense. On the other hand, a male has no guarantee of a paternity, and a promiscuous female has a much greater…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 10:52 PM
2

Let's talk about the end points of two mutually exclusive egalitarian worldviews: "Equality of opportunity" and "equality of outcome." With equality of opportunity, there wouldn't be a 50:50 representation of the genders in every area. Men are objectively stronger (on average) than women, and a very large portion of jobs in the world require physical strength, so men have a biological advantage in those areas, which means they are simply more valuable. Men are also much more aggressive, competit…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter