| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | [Some lady] got yelled at by Brett Kavanaugh for milling around his office unaccompanied, "tidying up" papers from a presumably classified investigation 20 years ago. It made her feel bad, (emotional violence!) so she testified to three members of congress about it.what you're implying through the title is your interpretation of the events [the quotations around "tidying up" ; "it made her feel bad (emotional violence!)"], so let's just not pretend that your version of events is anywhere near accurate or objective either, the narrative you're trying to push is pretty obvious. Kavanaugh was not her boss, and she told him explicitly under whose authority she was there. All he had to do was to confirm with Starr. There was no "justifiably angry" in this. Pret… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/18 02:51 PM |
| 4 | [Some lady] got yelled at by Brett Kavanaugh for milling around his office unaccompanied, "tidying up" papers from a presumably classified investigation 20 years ago. It made her feel bad, (emotional violence!) so she testified to three members of congress about it."I am here at the invitation of Judge Starr, and he shared with the group who I am and why I’m here." "He couldn’t have possibly thought I was a spy, because he knew who I was—we had met before and been in each other’s company several times since." | /r/MensRights | 06/11/18 04:14 AM |
| 2 | We should be careful to not become like the sexist feminists we hate, and not to let rage and anger control us so that we don't become mysogynistic, and destroy this sub and this movement from within.It was mostly liberals and moderates, it seems to have received quite a number of right-wing people lately though, especially with the Kavanaugh issue of late. Men's rights should be something that can be supported regardless of politics, but lately posts and content around here have been moving the direction of TD-lite, disparaging against "liberals" and "dishonest media", which is disconcerting to say the least. This post for instance have a really toxic and misleading title to paint an anti-w… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 07:13 AM |
| 0 | Remember, folks, unless you vote exactly how you're told to by a worthless muck-raker, you're a horrible woman hater and a "regressive".This post have nothing to do with Mens rights. The journalist (worthless muck-raker? really?) does not tell its readers to vote a certain way or call its readers "a horrible woman hater and a regressive" if they didn't. Why don't you stop putting bullshit into other people's mouths? The article in question merely criticizes Kim Reynold's conservative politics (a woman criticizing another woman? GASP), and by extension Ivanka Trump's support of her. The article was not "deliberately provocative" … | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 08:32 AM |
| 1 | As usual, woman who accused Kavanaugh of raping her admits they never even metRemember when /r/MensRights was about supporting proper due process for men instead of assuming that all accusations against males were false? This sub have been infested by right-wingers drinking the RepubliFox Koolaid lately. The last time I was here there were people claiming that the only problem with Kavanaugh was these "false rape accusations" and they never heard about any other problems regarding him. Nothing about his repeated lying under oath, nothing about his atrocious partisanship, … | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 08:05 AM |
| 1 | Believe Women!eh... I'd have really liked for the left and right to come together in fighting for gender equality, so I'm hesitant to say that any right-wing stuff should be censored here... But at the same time I'm not really sure this is about false accusations and due process anymore (not with the GOP suppressing investigation into the issue)... instead, this is just about politics, with conservatives pushing their agenda. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 05:38 AM |
| 1 | Believe Women!I'm not saying there's a lot of positivity in the Kavanaugh threads (they're actually a prime example of the toxicity I mentioned), I was trying to say that they don't get as much upvotes as the politically neutral posts and comments, and they tend to have a lot of controversially voted comments within them. (also the Candace Owens post wasn't as high as it currently is now when I first wrote that) | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 05:18 AM |
| -3 | So true.I'm not the one claiming I've never heard anything bad/good about the guy. I've heard a bit of both criticisms on him and how he's supposedly a decent guy. Though it sure doesn't help that the people vouching for him have a track record of being shameless liars. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 04:24 AM |
| 8 | Believe Women!If you check between posts and comments defending Kavanaugh and compare that to content that is politically neutral and just gender focused, you can see that most of the sub is probably left-leaning. That being said I feel that sometimes the content around here goes beyond the boundaries of pointing out injustice towards men and advocating true gender equality, instead going into the "fuck womenz" territory, which I find disheartening to say the least. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/18 11:00 PM |
| 7 | So true.He’s an excellent pick based on his record and experience. 100,000 pages of his records are withheld from the senate and 42,000 pages of documents were released the night before the confirmation hearings. There is obviously nothing to cover up there. All judges are partisan. Obama’s two nominees are a dream of the left. You mean like Merrick Garland, who is widely considered a moderate and centrist? | /r/MensRights | 29/09/18 10:49 PM |
| 0 | So true.Then you really need to get out of your right-wing echo chamber. Nothing about him lying about trump's respect for the judiciary system and that "No president has ever consulted more widely or talked to more people from more backgrounds to seek input for a Supreme Court nomination"? Nothing about how he couldn't give a straight answer on whether the president could pardon himself or must respond to subpoena? Nothing about him blatantly lying about his relationship with alcohol and women in his h… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/18 10:42 PM |
| 3 | STUDY: Feminists more willing to 'sacrifice' menI meant misandrists, thanks for catching that :). | /r/MensRights | 06/06/18 08:55 AM |
| -9 | STUDY: Feminists more willing to 'sacrifice' menI get that what you're basically saying is that an aspect of feminism is pursuit of gender equality and it's not thoroughly misandry, and I appreciate seeing your comments amongst extremes. An unfortunate part of subreddits like these is that they tend to cause polarization due to the rage inducing content posted within it. Race empowerment groups sometimes attract racists, gender right groups sometimes attracts misogynists and *misandrists who generalize their perceived opposition into a single… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/18 08:15 PM |
| 2 | Please don't lump us into oneThe commenter didn't intentionally make a haiku, otherwise he'd have structured it as one. The bot just identifies the coincidental structures and repeats it as a new comment. I'd still blame the bot, or /u/Eight1911 at least for creating a bot that spams comments that doesn't add to the conversation | /r/MensRights | 15/08/17 02:43 PM |
| 11 | Equality from a feminists point of view. I just couldn't help myself. I was morally obligated to fix it.Someone really wants Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron to become reality | /r/MensRights | 07/10/16 04:27 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter