TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SanctuaryMoon Archive

View 0 posts and 185 comments by SanctuaryMoon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Are you suggesting that rapists are like substance abusers? Rape is not an addiction. It's not a victimless crime. Drug abusers belong in rehab. Rapists belong behind bars, at least for some amount of time. Also how many rape accusations that are taken seriously do you believe are fraudulent? Like what percentage? Do you have any numbers?
/r/MalePsychology26/04/23 05:48 AM
-1

Genuine question, OP. I was looking through your other posts. What exactly do you mean by the phrase "rape hysteria culture?" Because that sounds immediately dismissive of the epidemic of sexual violence that women overwhelming are subjected to.
/r/MalePsychology26/04/23 05:29 AM
2

Wouldn't equality be a slap for a slap?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/22 09:16 PM
2

That's because you understand that you shouldn't respond with maximum aggression unless it's absolutely necessary. Someone wronging you isn't some magical free pass to hurt them as much as you want (and it shouldn't be). Use only what is necessary to keep yourself safe and that's enough.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/22 09:16 PM
0

... why would violence be necessary?
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 06:00 PM
1

What rights do women have that men do not?
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 05:59 PM
0

"Merely" as in they didn't have a choice. Society forbade them from being able to provide for themselves.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 05:57 PM
-1

Obviously there are anti-abortion women. But they are definitely the minority. If the decision was up to women alone, those laws would not be passed.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 05:56 PM
-4

So if men could get pregnant, do you think it would be illegal for them to get abortions? Because honestly I don't think men would put up with that kind of invasion on their freedom. I know I wouldn't.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 05:05 AM
-1

How do men have zero reproductive rights? I control my body. I can get surgeries on my reproductive organs if I want to.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 03:59 AM
-2

Men are typically paid more than women for the same job though (there are a lot of factors but it's still the case).
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 03:46 AM
-2

Obviously not that many if abortion bans are on the rise.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 03:43 AM
-1

It should be optional. Women who want to do dangerous, dirty, health affecting, life threatening work should have that option without being discriminated against. Also, anyone should be able to have a career and build a life without having to be married or be tied to someone else.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 03:26 AM
0

Typically it's when they earn more.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 02:26 AM
0

If women aren't the majority in power making the decisions for society, then society cannot be a matriarchy. Men still vastly outnumber women in that metric. It's a statistical fact.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 02:10 AM
2

Women who make more money have to pay child support to their ex-husbands. Literally the situation of someone I know. I'm no fan of marriage and don't think the state has any business in it, but no one should be forced to stay married who doesn't want to be.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 02:05 AM
2

You think people who don't want to be married should be forced to remain so without another reason? What the actual fuck?
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 11:34 PM
-1

Patriarchy is very real rule in social groups that adhere to it (like fundamentalist Christians). It's a tool that maintains the power structure. Like I said it's a big factor even if it's not the whole equation.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 11:33 PM
-3

If you can't have your own bank account because you're a woman, that is oppression. It wasn't even that long ago. My aunt had to live under that. That's certainly not "protected." Also, what traditionally feminine jobs do men not have access to? Men and women often prefer different kinds of jobs, but there are always exceptions. If we have a shortage of people wanting to do hard stuff that needs to be done, we have positive ways to incentivize people.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 11:26 PM
0

Uh that might be true in North Korea, but the most powerful people in the world get criticized all the time. It doesn't diminish their power one bit. Also we criticize men and women all the time. Trump is a cunt. So is Lauren Boebert. Where are my handcuffs?
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 09:27 PM
0

... should people need a reason to divorce?
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 09:05 PM
-1

Totally agree about wealth being the real ruler of society. But that doesn't totally rule patriarchy out, because we still have a lot of elements of it. I think it's most evident in Christian fundamentalists who are very patriarchal and also the bedrock for neo-feudal and neo-liberal politicians. Big money is using the deeply rooted patriarchy in a lot of Christian culture to get/retain power.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 09:04 PM
1

That's not what defines matriarchy/patriarchy...
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 09:00 PM
-4

So there are more women in positions of power? Since when?
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 08:59 PM
-11

I mean you made a pretty good explanation of patriarchy for women. "Women's rights would be set around women's contribution to society." For a long time women were considered merely mothers and homemakers and that's where their rights were limited to.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 08:58 PM
0

There are some matriarchal societies that have existed and even some subsets of society). If anything, it would probably just be women banding together more to raise children collectively while men leave to do work or just do their own thing. Men wouldn't hold so many positions of power, but they wouldn't be subjugated either.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 08:56 PM
-8

What does this have to do with feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/22 02:57 AM
5

Maybe rich people shouldn't be encouraged to buy other people's bodies for the sole purpose of birthing their children but I don't know.
/r/AntiFeminists12/08/22 06:43 PM
1

Nofap is not based on any medical science. It's true that there are people who struggle with masturbation addiction, but there is no physiological benefit from complete abstinence. It's pseudoscience.
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/22 06:03 PM
1

It is a simple fact that far right groups like to ban their men from masturbating. You don't have to like the daily show but you can find that common factor in extremist groups because it makes members malleable and angry.
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/22 05:51 PM
1

They aren't required to abstain from sex, just masturbation. Because they think it will help them get the sex they're struggling to find. Also what is true? Masturbation actually creates testosterone, releases endorphins, and relaxes those frustrations which makes men less irritable and more appealing. So they have it backwards.
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/22 05:46 PM
1

Yeah because normal young men travel en masse by U-Haul truck to incite riots at Pride events /s The Proud Boys are anti-masturbation and the members are "banned" from doing it. They also believe abstaining makes them "more masculine" and more "appealing" to women.
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 10:50 PM
1

I mean the Proud Boys advocate against masturbation and members are "banned" from doing it (I put it in quotes because I don't know how that's enforced). But they aren't the only far right group that dabbles in the 'sexually frustrated make.' https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-news/daily-show-proud-boys-alt-right-masturbation-909193/
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 10:44 PM
1

I was responding to your point about women being selective. My point is that shitty laws that enable rapists to force women to birth their children directly undermines women's ability to do that.
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 10:38 PM
1

Voting out the people who want abortion bans.
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 02:54 PM
2

They literally recruit from sexually frustrated young men. It's basically a prerequisite.
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 02:54 PM
1

But there majority of the people making those laws are men. If it was left entirely up to women those laws wouldn't pass.
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 02:48 PM
1

Just going full mask off then huh?
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 02:47 PM
1

Uh so because they try to look preppy they aren't incels? The leaders may not all be incels but sexually frustrated young men are exactly who they prey on for recruitment.
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 02:37 PM
0

Men are passing laws banning abortion in all cases.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 04:00 PM
0

Men are passing laws banning abortion in all cases.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 03:56 PM
-1

Wow really? Next are you gonna say that simply existing as a white person is deemed "racist?"
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 03:16 PM
0

I think you have a point that a lot of women agree with. A big problem though are places that force women to give birth to their rapists' children, which is now a number of U.S. states and likely to be more.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 03:11 PM
-1

FDS are femcels not feminists the same way Proud Boys are incels and misogynists but not men's rights activists.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 02:54 PM
0

The definition is exactly the same. People who are involuntarily celibate. It does get thrown around a lot more now. But this meme is definitely angry incel material though.
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 08:05 AM
-1

Wasn't "incel" created by incels to describe themselves and their frustrations?
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 03:19 AM
2

The person who made the meme is clearly no white knight.
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 03:17 AM
-12

That meme is certainly misogynistic so it definitely doesn't need defending. Also anyone who actually watched the show knows that they're both toxic dumpster fires of human beings. But it's a TV show so there has to be drama. Edit: just to be clear what makes it actually misogynistic is it says "spent her teens and youth partying and crossing her fingers to avoid pregnancy." That is clear misogyny.
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 03:16 AM
2

I mean she's definitely trying to maintain the image that she's a feminist but I haven't seen anything since the trial about her officially representing any proper feminist organizations. There's some splintering though among feminism (like TERFs) but that's not mainstream. Even the ACLU isn't technically a feminist org but more so aligns with it. Feminist Theory is absolutely legit. That's the academic understanding of feminism though, and Amber Heard clearly does not align with that.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 05:43 PM
0

I saw that she did an op-ed with ACLU 4 years ago but nothing about her being a current ambassador. Is it a different NGO?
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 05:02 AM
1

Is Amber Heard even a feminist though?
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/22 04:22 AM
4

I've followed them for awhile and I personally have never seen an example posted that was accurate about women's bodies. They've all been stupidly inaccurate (at least the ones that are popular). Do you have any links or examples of the top of your head otherwise?
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 04:30 AM
-1

Okay but guys who are responsible for their own condom use can't be tricked/trapped into getting someone pregnant. So that person wasn't lying...
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 04:28 AM
-2

MGTOW is 100% an incel circlejerk and no different from FDS.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 02:20 AM
-2

It's a rage circlejerk. Honestly not that dissimilar from FDS or MGTOW.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 09:23 PM
2

And you aren't about to start
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 09:18 PM
2

I'm a guy and I think some of these are funny. Especially the "money they don't have" one. I laughed.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 09:12 PM
1

Two fronts: zeal and power Zeal is really straightforward. There are few issues that can be so passionate to so many people as saving babies from abortion. Even people who think it should be legal don't like abortion, so it's easy to understand why many people would hate it. Then if you convince enough people to make that their single issue, they'll vote for you even if you slowly take away their healthcare, jobs, housing, education, civil rights, etc. Because, after all, you're Pro-Life™️ and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 06:41 AM
2

These same people have been fighting for comprehensive and universal access to healthcare for years, which would totally cover most of those things. But the same people banning abortions are the ones stopping women (and men) from getting that kind of access. Some states have expanded healthcare and it does reduce demand for abortions. But those states are not the red states currently banning abortion. In short: people who are poor and lack access to healthcare leads to increased unwanted pregnan…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 06:03 AM
2

I didn't say forcing to have sex. I said forcing to give birth. If we know that making it easier to prevent pregnancies will prevent abortions in the first place, why don't anti-abortion champion those proven measures at all? Because that's not the true goal. Otherwise they would be pushing for comprehensive sex ed that teaches safe sex and provides access to contraception. They would fight to make birth control over-the-counter and make PlanB dirt cheap. They would make sure sexual health check…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:27 AM
0

Uh we're several billion people away from any bottleneck...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 03:52 AM
–

If preventing unwanted pregnancies is sure to prevent abortions, why don't the people banning abortions support expanding proven measures to prevent unwanted pregnancy? At all? Why don't any of these laws include provisions to help people prevent pregnancies? Because it's not about preventing abortions. It's about forcing women who have sex and get pregnant to give birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 03:49 AM
–

Well you aren't benefitting the species any.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 03:37 AM
1

How does this have anything to do with regular guys? Depp is one of the biggest celebrities in the world. He's worth $150 million. Of course he can get justice for himself. He can pay for it. It literally does nothing for anyone else.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:27 AM
-1

Basic hygiene is a societal concern, and societal concerns are shared problems for men and women. Stop trying to make Men's Rights just anti-feminism. That's not what it is. It's pro-issues, not anti-women's issues or anti-societal issues. We're trying to improve life for all men, and sometimes meeting the needs of women and children actually improves life for men.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:54 AM
-1

I thought the point of this sub was to advocate making life better for men. The thing OP is complaining about would be good for everyone, including men, even if it is indirect rather than direct. MGTOW philosophy doesn't work because it's toxic. It does not care about actually helping men, just trying to make things harder for everyone else to give the illusion of making things seem better for men. Taking care of everyone's basic needs, whether they be all the same or different, is in the best i…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:32 AM
1

And the ones who don't?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:22 AM
0

So you're no women have it hard at all, ever? Not one?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 08:51 AM
-12

I don't have kids but yet I'm okay with other people's kids getting free (tax-funded) school lunch. I'm okay with teenagers and young adults having access to free (tax-funded) prophylactics. I'm okay with homeless people having access to restrooms and showers. I'm okay with women and girls in need having easy access to sanitary products even though I will never have a need for them. You know why? Because those things make society a more pleasant place to live. People who are struggling have a be…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 08:41 AM
-38

So your great fight for Men's Rights is to bitch about poor women and girls possibly getting publicly-sourced sanitary products? You poor thing! This post just reeks male FDS.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 08:13 AM
24

How the fuck is this Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 07:43 AM
1

Okay, men are valued for being kind, sympathetic, ambitious, gentle, trustworthy, hardworking, funny, creative, generous, loyal, clever... I can go on. Unfortunately in our current socio-economic system shrewdness and sociopathy are often rewarded for being "business-savvy," but that doesn't diminish the fact that those other traits are highly valued.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:19 PM
2

Well what exactly was your assessment? That domestic violence against men is a problem? Or that's it's somehow a bigger problem than domestic violence against women? Because while all DV is bad and that includes violence against men, it really is not comparable to the severity of the issue of DV against women and trying to compare it makes it look like you think it's as bad or worse, which it is not. Like you say women abusers are more likely to use deadly weapons, but you do realize how easy it…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 07:35 PM
2

I mean I didn't say it was efficient (although slavery is insanely efficient in some respects). But what is undeniable is that slaves literally built the cities and way of life, and yet the predominant role they played was not recognized for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 03:09 PM
3

That... doesn't compute. The work of African slaves absolutely did more to "contribute" to the development of the American South, but of all the statues in the region, how many represent those people?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:21 AM
3

Darwin had groundbreaking ideas on the origin of species, but he is not a reliable authority on the cognitive differences that may exist between men and women. My goodness. And IQ tests do not at all account for creativity or ingenuity, and even their ability to measure intelligence itself accurately is hotly debated. Come on.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:18 AM
8

You do realize the flaw in this right? If their accomplishments were deliberately forgotten or buried, evidence is going to be likely nonexistent. That said, we do actually have some valid evidence of that proposed practice (like the story behind the black women who were essential to putting men on the moon).
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:14 AM
-1

That is absolutely not the only way for men to be viewed as valuable and perpetuating that idea does a great disservice to men and boys. There are so so so many ways in which society, women, and other men value men and I think it would do you a lot of good to get out and see it.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:12 AM
3

Should women have more statues than men? No not necessarily (also having statues of people at all is controversial). But it is not insignificant to consider the obvious fact that women are clearly underrepresented. Is that because they haven't contributed as much historically? Possibly Have their contributions been ignored or buried? Possibly. If so, why is that? If they genuinely have not contributed as much historically, why is that? Are women naturally less curious or ingenious? Or has someth…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:09 AM
1

Maybe before COVID, but now lots of people prefer that over hand contact.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 09:14 PM
3

Handshakes are for business (or bow depending on your culture). I'm also a big fan of the elbow bump because I don't know where other people's hands have been. Best to keep hugs outside the workplace.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 04:54 PM
1

https://www.businessinsider.com/parents-determine-child-success-income-inequality-2014-1?op=1
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:25 PM
3

Family money doesn't have to be a fortune. It just means enough to be in the top 10% or so of earners. That's not yacht money. It's enough that their child can do any extracurricular, or hire a tutor, or graduate from college debt-free. Also there is no such thing as a "self-made billionaire." It is impossible for any person to create a billion dollars of value on their own without the necessary work of lots of other people.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:23 PM
14

It's almost like increasing spending on our super duper defense budget has jack shit to do with the troops and government employees and is actually just a scam to make billionaires richer.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:48 PM
18

The number one factor for being rich is coming from family money. Hands down. Not even intelligence comes close.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 08:31 PM
27

Reminder if you didn't get an 8% raise since last year technically your boss gave you a pay cut.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 08:30 PM
-4

Is it often used to boost self-esteem? Yes. Does that make it pornography? No.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 04:12 PM
-8

"Sexual market value" is a made up incel phrase that needs to stay 100 yards away from Men's Rights at all times. It's derived from sexually frustrated and rejected males and has absolutely nothing to do with Men's Rights issues.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 04:11 PM
0

You forgot the /s right?
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:58 PM
7

Bingo
/r/MensRights03/03/22 04:19 AM
50

It is always a good idea to not date in the workplace. No justification required.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 04:53 AM
5

Marjorie Taylor Greene is as vile as she is stupid.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:49 AM
10

Absolutely get rid of the draft. If your country is worth fighting for, you shouldn't need to force people to do it.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 12:40 AM
3

Yes that is true and also a problem.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 12:39 AM
2

No one here is saying that women are the primary victims either. I'm just saying that it's rich men who have always sent our boys off to fight, not women.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 12:38 AM
-21

So you're saying that men are so brutish and emotional that declaring war is the only acceptable response for a woman cheating on her husband? We're trying to dispel the false notion of all men being dumb brutes.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 10:41 PM
-27

How many soldiers did she order to fight? It was men who made other men fight and die.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:42 PM
1

Ukraine is not a NATO state and had no interest in joining NATO, so that's not a valid argument.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:10 PM
2

Putin is responsible, period. Ukraine had no interest in joining NATO. Not until Putin started amassing the Russian military for this pre-planned invasion.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:08 PM
2

Those are some badass women!
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:04 PM
-26

Women and children are also victims of war. We can and should sympathize with all people who suffer from war.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 08:59 PM
-11

Seriously. I feel like the only guys who actually believe women are okay with the men in their lives going and dying in combat don't have any meaningful relationships with women. Like it's such stupidly basic common sense that women don't want to lose their husbands and brothers and sons and fathers. Old men send young men to die in wars. That is every war in American history. The only guys who think this is some kind of gotcha just want to blame women for the sins of rich old men.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 08:56 PM
-40

Even if that was true that's still men initiating the war.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 08:48 PM
40

Just abolish it. The entire premise of conscription is opposed to America's founding principles.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 08:46 PM
2

I think you're missing the point. You're calling BS because it is absurd, but you're naive if you think bosses don't make absurd demands like this. Is it possible that an anonymous story is made up? Yes. Is this story unbelievable? No. Are there tons of real stories that are similar or worse? Absolutely. Should that kind of behavior be shamed? Absolutely. Is this an indictment of all men? No not at all. Frankly I can't understand why you would take offense at all unless you think it's a reasonab…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 08:24 PM
-5

Eh not gonna lie that just seemed like the boys version of FDS. Same hopeless bitterness. That said, I do believe there's a big problem that's sabotaging dating for young men (as well as other things) and it's not women's standards. It's money. Young people as a whole now have much less money than their parents did at the same age. Young working men have been slowly robbed of decent wages over the course of 50 years, and it's not because of women. That money has gone straight to the richest peop…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 08:04 PM
1

Men oppressing women on the basis of sex: sexism Men oppressing other men on the basis of economic class: not sexism
/r/MensRights21/02/22 12:39 AM
-3

You keep trying to make warfare a sexism issue. NEWSFLASH: Women don't want their husbands/brothers/sons/father's to go die in combat! They want them to stay home and grow old with their families. Name one war that was initiated by women—where the highest levels of leadership initiating the conflict were women. Seriously name one. There has never been an American woman president or female-majority Congress. You're blaming women for the sins of old rich men who take the lives of young men for mon…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 12:09 AM
-9

The Wikipedia article claims that sexism has primarily been used against women, which is historically sound. The many hardships that have plagued men have been by and large imposed by other men.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:52 PM
-15

Women were treated as property in the U.S. into the 20th century. It used to be that women couldn't own property or hold a bank account in their names. So yes, they were stopped from working unless they had a man to provide those things. Women couldn't even vote until 50 years after former male slaves got that right. And every one of those wars was started by men. That's not a sexism issue it's a class issue. We here are perfectly capable of discussing actual sexism against men without adopting …
/r/MensRights20/02/22 07:41 PM
-30

Women have historically been the primary victims of sexism, at least in the modern western world. That's not outrageous. And most misogynists do seem to prefer women to remain in separate, lower-power positions. And there are plenty of men's rights groups that seem to only exist to cry "feminism bad" (I see it here ALL THE TIME) rather than outlining legitimate, realistic policy changes that really reinforce equal opportunities. Honestly this isn't a men's rights issue. If you want wikipedia or …
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:44 PM
-6

Is it ostracism for a preference or ostracism for weird explanations like this post that get thrown around? Because there's a mountain of difference between saying it makes you feel uncomfortable to be with someone who's much more sexually experienced than you are versus proclaiming that women having many sexual partners makes them likely to cheat.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 11:46 PM
-13

How are men with those preferences "penalized?" What penalties are being imposed?
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:02 PM
-1

Actually yeah I'm curious to see what "biology" you seem to think is at work here.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 09:59 PM
-6

Reasonable and secure.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 09:56 PM
3

takes notes "Get abortions to...look cool." WTF
/r/MensRights16/02/22 10:18 PM
5

I don't think abortion or divorce are being suggested to be used for spite but rather to have complete separation from a bad partner. Definitely the nuclear option but that's reddit comments for you.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 10:16 PM
65

We need to absolutely talk about how working men are losing more and more money but we need to be honest who the main culprit is: billionaires. Corporations. Banks. This is who got trillions of dollars richer while millions of working men got poorer over the last 50 years and especially the last two years. Getting rid of that trickle-down bullshit is 100% a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:10 AM
6

Is it unsolicited? Is there consent? Context is critical. Sending unwanted nudes is never sexy.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 07:52 PM
-5

Yes. It's always inappropriate, same as student/professor and employee/boss relationships.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 11:15 PM
2

What is your diet like?
/r/MensRights06/02/22 07:22 PM
8

This whole thing reads like a guy who watches girls at the mall (or he would if girls still spent all their free time at the mall like they did in the good ol' days). Dude just ranted about his turn offs from people who aren't even in his dating pool and has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:29 AM
15

Homophobia is not men's rights
/r/MensRights05/02/22 09:58 AM
21

You mean you don't want to read a 57-year-old man's analysis on the appeal of modern high school girls?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 09:55 AM
1

Toxic masculinity is not and has never been a slur, and claiming to be offended by something does not make it hate speech. It is an academic term. It is no more "hate speech" than saying "obesity." There is no lack of empathy nor trolling. You're misrepresenting something legitimate to play victim.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:18 PM
4

To piggyback off this a little bit, "whataboutism" is not an argument. Saying that men should get a pass on being shitty because of what you perceive as women getting a pass on being shitty is not good for men's rights. There seems to be a lot of animosity toward basic accountability that gets defended with finger pointing.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 08:32 PM
3

Especially especially do not date or have intimate relations with your subordinates. A relationship with someone on the same power level may be inappropriate, but a relationship with someone who works below you is unethical.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 08:41 AM
1

As a pretty typical masculine man I have dealt with toxic masculinity and call it out where I see it. It's not hate speech lol. It's a group of crappy ideas that encourage crappy behavior. In this case men tearing down other men. Conscription is unethical for anyone by the way.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 04:04 AM
-2

There are no good economic reasons to not raise a minimum wage that is below the poverty line. Raising the minimum wage raises wages across the board with maybe the exception of CEOs. That means hard working blue collar men would see much needed wage increases even if they're already making more than minimum wage. This is 100% a men's rights issue because low wages are killing men.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:54 AM
-1

Toxic masculinity refers to the repeated and shared ideas of what it means to be manly that are harmful to men and other people. Typically it manifests itself as callousmess and cruelty.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:48 AM
3

Prison. It's free.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:38 AM
-10

I'm not going to say every, but a lot of standards that cause trouble for men are deeply rooted in toxic masculinity. Glorifying power and vilifying weakness are traits that seem to be inherently common among men and lead to cruelty to each other and to selves. A really great example is men opposing social services and raising the minimum wage because they think that "weaker" people deserve to suffer, rather than the true masculine belief that true men help the most vulnerable among us.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:05 AM
1

Jordan Peterson is good at making bad or incomplete ideas sound reasonable. Don't worry about what he has to say.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:53 PM
3

When it comes to doing sexual things to minors (which includes catcalling/sexual harassment), ignorance isn't a valid defense. If you sexually harass someone who could be underage, you assume the risk and deserve the consequence. Protecting kids from predators should be enforced.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 05:12 PM
4

Okay, but I was talking about the person being downvoted for saying she brought charges against a guy who sexually catcalled her at 14. No one here should have a problem with that.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 06:25 AM
9

Okay but in regards to this comment I think we can all agree that telling a minor she's "a nice piece of ass" is not only offensive but perverse and indefensible.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 06:00 AM
19

Yeah no one here should be bothered by a man being punished who deserved it.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 05:48 AM
-9

You probably don't know what kinds of insane harassment happens to accusers of high profile people. Fans are crazy. And accusers typically can't afford security teams.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 02:45 AM
4

Cue "sexual market value" explanation. Does this "science" apply to us men as well?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 05:08 PM
2

We don't know. I'm just saying it is possible to take advantage of another person's addiction. Edit: she did say she confided in them, so they knew.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 04:32 PM
5

If someone is legitimately addicted to something it can be super easy to take advantage of them. That doesn't absolve them entirely of responsibility but you aren't innocent if you knowingly exploit someone's addiction.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 04:28 PM
3

Why would anyone show loyalty to someone who's a hypocrite and betrays their cause? That doesn't make sense anywhere.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 08:20 PM
-2

Is there a reason you want male-only study groups? Because there are legitimate reasons behind female-only study groups. If you want to advocate for it you're going to have to articulate the need, and a kneejerk response isn't really a need.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:47 AM
1

I didn't say it should be a victim's responsibility. In fact I said you could argue it shouldn't be. But if you want an exception to be made to the law, you need to understand that legally child support is not a punishment in the first place. Instead focus on the fact that it is a necessary service that needs nuanced exceptions in rare, extreme circumstances where a victim is not actually responsible.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:43 PM
-1

You can call it a burden or unjust or undeserved all you want. That's fine. But child support is not a punishment. It's a responsibility. You can argue that certain people shouldn't bear the responsibility, but classifying child support as a punishment is dishonest because that's not what it is.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:13 PM
1

I'm not saying that it doesn't suck or that it's fair. I'm just saying that child support payments are not a punishment. They are not a fine. They serve a legitimate non-punitive purpose. If you want to make a case to replace them with more robust taxpayer-funded social welfare then have at it but otherwise my point still stands.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:08 PM
-2

No one is saying it isn't a thing
/r/MensRights24/01/22 06:41 AM
5

How is this men's rights?
/r/MensRights23/01/22 09:01 PM
-6

That's only if the mother is the primary caregiver, which would make sense.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 10:29 PM
-3

Yeah this. Child support is not a punishment. It's to make sure a child that exists is financially cared for. This should really be an issue about custody not skipping child support.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 10:17 PM
-3

This.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 12:25 AM
10

Don't confuse male sexuality with predatory behavior. We should, male or female, always strive to not make other people feel violated and to call out people who do, whether they be men or women.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:54 AM
4

You sound like a healthy socialized human being /s
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:24 AM
-4

This sounds like confirmation bias
/r/MensRights09/01/22 04:48 AM
-3

Notice how OP doesn't say there's piss and dirt everywhere. I have no doubt someone sanitizes it every day. But maybe if you worked in schools (like I do) you'd know that right now it is very common for things in school bathrooms to be busted or stolen because of that stupid tik tok trend, and schools don't have the budget to buy new stuff every week. Leave it to this sub to spin teen boys acting like hooligans as radical feminism. Y'all got some active imaginations.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:56 PM
-27

They probably are putting equal levels of effort but the boys are breaking/stealing stuff. It's been a problem in schools this year.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 08:03 AM
-39

So teen boys trash the boys bathroom and you blame... feminists? Willing to bet that paper towel dispenser was stolen by a kid for tik tok. This is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 07:55 AM
2

It's easier to get accurate information. That is what I said. You don't need to know how many kids men are having if you know how many kids women are having. It's the same number. But women aren't going to give birth to kids they don't know about, whereas men have kids they don't know about. You're literally complaining that they didn't waste resources to survey a whole bunch of people for no reason. Surveying men would have offered no statistical significance whatsoever in this case. Use your l…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:02 AM
2

It's probably a lot easier to get an accurate birthrate figure for women because they're the ones who give birth. Women don't accidentally give birth to a child they don't know about.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:02 AM
3

Well no one owes another person sex any time ever, but masturbation is very much a thing and there's nothing wrong with it (in moderation).
/r/MensRights07/12/21 04:56 AM
2

In-voluntarily cel-ibate. In-cel.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 11:35 PM
2

That's "infidel," smartass. "Incel" is involuntarily celibate and describes men who blame women for their sexual/romantic undesirability and lash out in perverted and sometimes violent ways. Don't defend pervs in the name of men's rights ffs.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:32 PM
-2

Women will start getting harassed at like 12 years old. Why do you find it hard to believe that so many would experience it at least once in their lives? Do you really have to see it to believe it? I've been sexually harassed and I'm a guy. Why should I not believe women?
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:52 AM
-3

Bro she didn't want her parents to know. Like, you know that right? That's super super common.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:40 AM
4

How much do you actually know about foster care?
/r/MensRights05/12/21 03:41 AM
1

The financial logistics of that would be a disaster.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 03:35 AM
3

Bingo.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 03:27 AM
4

Men's rights needs to support abortion rights. We all know that if men could get pregnant we would defend our right to abort 100% until our dying breath. We would never entertain being forced by anyone to give birth if we didn't want to. Let's not be hypocrites. Fighting for custody rights for children who are born is fine but I don't believe for one second that anyone here would be okay with a woman or the government forcing him to grow something inside him without his consent.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 03:22 AM
1

Yeah unfortunately it's just become a cultural norm here. Other places even think it's weird we say "uncircumcised" instead of "natural" like they do (other places that are arguably more feminist than the US). Luckily though the push to not circumcise is strong here right now so it's declining. And as far as women are concerned, from all of my experiences they don't care if a penis is natural or not as long as the guy keeps his equipment clean.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 07:39 PM
1

Circumcision should definitely not be happening to babies at all ever, but it has nothing to do with feminism. I don't know why so many people here are clinging so desperately to something so obviously ridiculous. They're acting like FDS. Anyway the link between circumcision and religion is pretty clear cut. It originated due to religion thousands of years ago and has been standard practice for some religions ever since. It was believed that it reduced sensitivity and made masturbation more diff…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:38 PM
1

Okay so if a guy helps create a child and doesn't want to be a father, then he should help pay for it unless it gets adopted. He can try to get custody if he doesn't want to pay but no parent should get to just completely abandon the child. This is why I say condoms are man's best friend—super easy to not get someone pregnant. If the father wants the child and the mother doesn't, then can go for custody if she wants to carry to term. If she doesn't want it then it should be fairly easy for him t…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:19 PM
0

Not "nice guy" nice. Actual nice. As in intellectual not irrational.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:32 AM
-1

It's not. Organized religion (headed by men) is mostly responsible.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:30 AM
-1

What was the last war started by women? I'm sorry but the people sending men to war are other men—specifically rich men. Don't confuse the real enemy there.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:29 AM
2

Weird shit like this is why men's rights gets associated with incels.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:27 AM
3

Yeah what is the men's rights issue there? How do we know that 80% women and 20% men don't have cause to initiate divorce?
/r/MensRights04/12/21 12:26 AM
-1

I agree with pretty much all of that except for #5. If you make a kid you shouldn't get a pass to be a deadbeat. Condoms are man's best friend.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:08 PM
-1

"The patriarchy doesn't exist. Thousands of years of men being in almost every position of power/authority is really female dominance." Okay come on. You can't be that delusional. You can argue for current men's issues but now you're just lying about history.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:04 PM
5

What is wrong with women initiating divorce though? Honestly I don't know any women who initiated divorce who didn't have really good reasons for it.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 10:57 PM
-18

Just focus on being a good person and developing healthy masculinity. Don't get bitter and disillusioned because that speaker didn't talk about empowering young men. Men are empowered. If you don't feel that then this is your cue now. You don't need to be afraid of marginalized groups trying to find a voice. They are your brothers and sisters. Take care of them. You are empowered. True masculinity is using your power to care for the people around you. All of them. Be kind. Be generous. Be gentle…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 10:01 AM
5

Yeah these are not mainstream opinions. This is basically FDS stuff i.e. extremely low-hanging fruit.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:12 AM
3

This kind of incel trash makes men's rights look like a bunch of rapists and dipshits. Piss right off.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:39 AM
3

"I imagined a child and now it's alive what do I do??"
/r/MensRights03/09/21 03:51 AM
1

Well saying that 90% of women aren't as qualified as 90% of men also suggests the presence of privilege. So that leaves 90% of women not working hard enough being more probable than it actually being more difficult for women to get those positions? Come on. You don't have to admit that it's ALL due to privilege to just recognize that some exists.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 11:39 PM
-18

That's not what privilege means though. If that statistic is true, it's evidence that something is causing it to be more difficult for women to obtain positions of power. A disadvantage. The opposite of that is a privilege.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 12:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter