TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sandlicker Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by Sandlicker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Hot. I never question offers like that when they come from someone named "pervy_account" ;)
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:10 AM
5

If I'm a man who looks like the women on the bottom from shoulders to thighs then what roles are available to me?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:47 PM
2

To be fair, the guys on those books are hot as hell and He-man's muscles are kinda gross. I neither want to be nor to have sex with He-man. I want both from those book covers. For clarity: I don't think my statements contradict the idea that unreasonable fantasies exist of both men and women by both men and women.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:44 PM
5

reply to me with your rationale Why bother? You aren't being rational yourself. downplaying what is obviously a worse example of human trauma I already said that I think oppression Olympics are pointless. If you aren't willing to help child soldiers unless they are also being raped then you are the one with the problem downvoting me None of those were me. It seems like your ideas are just unpopular. you crummy little cocksucker Actually, I do suck cock, and I love it, because I'm gay, you homoph…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 11:44 AM
8

Don't get me wrong, that's entirely awful, but there's a certain level of injustice at which you get my attention and sympathy and beyond that it's just incomprehensible. I really don't think there's any value in decided whether a boy who was made to shoot his own mother and burn his village has a worse life than a girl who is a sex slave. Either way, I want to help both of them. Oppression Olympics is pointless.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:08 AM
39

The bizarre thing is that this statistic is seen as relevant. They are child soldiers. That is all the reason you could ask for to be upset.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:25 PM
1

It's also true for groups you choose to be in. This does not mean that we must accept without judgment all elective groups that people participate in. Someone who joins a group is endorsing the beliefs/actions of that group as a whole, whether or not they share in them, but it would still be incorrect to assume that everyone in the group shares them. For example, I have met Christians who don't believe Jesus was God. Last I checked that was the entire point of the religion. I don't get it, but w…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:49 PM
1

I'm not painting anyone as anything, particularly not as "entitled", because I hate the way that words gets abused. I've never heard the word entitled use as a derogatory term by anyone I was interested in continuing to speak to. As far as her picture, there is one thing I can clearly say about it: It does not effectively make a point for or against her. She should have included more text on her sign.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:34 PM
0

The implication is that because they're women, they should be doing domestic work. I feel that this implication would only apply if the 3 girls had a brother that got left out of the guy's comment.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:11 PM
8

I think that his point is this: The fact that they were pressured into an apology is a sign that the tone of the conversation is changing to be more male positive. By showing appreciation for the apology piece we can help shift the conversation even further to the point where they are no longer writing pieces that require an apology to begin with. It doesn't matter as much whether the apology is sincere as long as they are convinced that there is no audience for their old material anymore.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:58 PM
21

If a person starts with the default thinking that all members of any subgroup are the same then that person is a prejudiced jerk. Men do not need to prove they are different unless you started off with the unjustified opinion that they are all the same. Same goes for women, homosexuals, all races, all nationalities, and pretty much anything else.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:21 PM
1

Except for the part where not just anyone/everyone makes the decision to molest someone You are missing my point so hard right here. It doesn't matter what a person has done. If you give the government power to take away anyone's rights they will wear away at the boundaries between those people and you until they find a way to take your rights away as well. I don't give a fuck if some child molester gets his comeuppance, trust me. What I care about is giving the government the power to make huma…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:52 AM
3

No, actually we can't. If human rights can be taken away from anyone they can be taken away from everyone.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:02 PM
4

"BUT" implies a relationship between those two things. How about "and" instead? It is a strange, invasive, unnecessary test that should not be performed on anyone and also this particular man happens to be a sex offender.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:13 PM
1

Life is certainly remarkable, but I would be lying if I said I didn't have mixed feelings about it. The concept of matter having an opinion about its conformation is strange and interesting no matter how long I think about it, but my mind also drifts to the idea that evil only exists because of the existence of such matter. Is a universe devoid of conscious matter morally superior to a universe with it? Is there such a thing as morality without this matter? (no, I don't think so). Does the capac…
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:02 PM
1

Devil's Advocate: If The universe has gone on for 13.8billion years to get here and it will continue for another 14billion after my ~75 years are over, what does it matter whether I choose to die or not? Not advocating suicide in particular here, I just noticed that I have used your same argument for the opposite purpose before.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:03 PM
2

I guess there are two perspectives on the number of couples in the world: Mine- some of these people must be decent people who respect each other or it's likely they wouldn't last, and Yours- most or all of those men are fools and most or all of those women are manipulators. I simply don't believe that there are so few women out there who are willing to engage in a relationship on equal footing.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 09:13 PM
0

The amount of women who truly treat men as equals and who are willing to put work into getting to know your average man are pretty far and few in between, and a man's odds of meeting such a woman, despite their existence, is still exceptionally low. The amount of humans who treat other humans as equals is not great, but the amount of people who are willing to get to know average people must be pretty high or there would be a lot many more people dying alone. Look at some of the ugly, stupid, bor…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:54 PM
1

Invalid_Target said: I don't think anybody should be allowed to make a decision like this until they are 18. 18 is post puberty. Please read the full thread in order to gain context before commenting.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:40 PM
4

Actually, none of them would have been, because that study didn't use hormone treatment and delayed-puberty hormone therapy doesn't sterilize those who go back to their birth sex. I am trying hard to meet your criticisms fairly, but you have to actually read what I put here if you expect to have a fair and balanced discussion. Also, the Dutch study vetted their patients better and all of the patients who were approved for delayed-puberty hormone therapy proceeded with their transition.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:27 PM
2

Here is a better source of info: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00870.x/full As far as that quote goes, your interpretation is incorrect. The quote states that, across two studies, out of 224 people who lived a year as the opposite gender, 125 of those (over half) chose to transition. The Portman Clinic study in London does not indicate that it's patients participated in hormone therapy.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:32 PM
5

The 6 yr old isn't getting top surgery, bottom surgery, hormones, or even a training bra. Luana is just getting her name and legal status changed to reflect how she identifies.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:22 PM
1

All of the quotes I've posted are from the article I previously linked.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:19 PM
1

The jury is still out on that one, but it is leaning in favor of, yes, they are capable. "The Portman clinic has treated 124 kids since 1989. It requires children to live as the gender they were born with. And 80 percent of its patients — once grown — chose as adults to keep their biological gender. The opposite outcome was seen by the researchers in the Netherlands who first developed the hormone-blocking treatment. They have treated 100 patients and all chose — as adults — to live as the oppos…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:16 PM
1

The 6 year old is not on hormones. The 6 yr old is just getting their name and legal status changed. Luana will probably not be put on hormones until she begins puberty at 12-14 (twice her current age).
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:08 PM
2

A difference of opinion then. I am approaching this with the understanding that, aside from freezing gametes, all trans people are sterile anyways. I can't answer on behalf of the trans community or any trans individuals, but my experience leads me to the conclusion that it is likely trans people would choose to have their body not altered by an incorrect puberty rather than their fertility. Oh also, I'm not sure if I was clear. It only results in sterility for those who go ahead with the transi…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:04 PM
5

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90273278&ft=1&f=1030 Apparently it results in sterility. So there you have it. One negative side effect. EDIT: "Spack, however, is quick to point out that there is no risk of infertility from the hormone-blocking treatment alone. Infertility only comes when the hormone-blocking treatment is paired with Stage 2, the use of opposite-sex hormones. And so, Spack says, hormone blockers should really be seen simply as a treatment that gives families…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:55 PM
7

By my understanding, if you take the hormone delay treatments, yes. Hormone conversion therapy is more intense than that and starts to develop secondary sex characteristics of the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:25 PM
2

Do you think adults are much better? Illuminati, Tea Party, Astrology, Homeopathy, the KKK, Terrorists, Healing Crystals, etc. Anything teenagers can stupid adults can stupid better.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:24 PM
4

How could you possibly think that? I'm sure if you asked the average cis person what gender they are when they are teens they would have no trouble answering, but somehow a trans person's answer doesn't count? You really underestimate the intellect of teenagers.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:08 PM
4

Why would it be? It's reversible.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:07 PM
13

Says who? Not psychologists. The boundary of 18years is a legal boundary not a medical boundary or a psychological boundary. A teen is easily capable of knowing what gender they are.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:51 PM
5

Uninformed? Mutilation? Where are you getting your info? Minors don't get surgeries. Minors get puberty-delaying hormone treatments. Do your homework.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:50 PM
0

I really don't think the difference is that significant, and I think you are underestimating the importance of having the child's documents match them. Schools and hospitals are going to encounter this person's legal identification. It will very frequently benefit someone to have their doctors know their full medical history including transitions, but, again, getting outed at each and every school you attend is not fun. Not all schools are accepting, and getting outed can be lethal for a trans p…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:08 PM
13

Too many body changes occur during the teen years to postpone this decision until that point. Legally demanding that a person go through puberty in a body they don't identify with is cruel.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:58 PM
0

You are operating from a certain assumption that is altering your perspective significantly. You are assuming that this wasn't the child's idea and that it isn't beneficial to her. I'm not sure what exact role the legal ID of a child plays in Argentina, but I know that having people call you by the right name will certainly improve your quality of life. You are also making assumptions about the desires of her parents and accusing them of mistreating their child. While we're at it, this assumptio…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:56 PM
1

There is a lot of negativity going on here. You have no evidence that there is any manipulation or coercion going on here. They're not giving the child bottom surgery and the article doesn't even say anything about hormones, so what chance is being taken? If the child's identity changes later, why would they not embrace that the same way they did now? You are being presumptuous, cynical, and hateful.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:30 PM
2

If that is the case then it is a valid point, but not an excuse. We are all a product of the systems that we live in, but we have a responsibility to challenge those systems.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:51 PM
1

How long have you been dating her for? A lot of people are saying that this isn't a break-up worthy offense, but for me if someone says something that bothers me before our 5th date there is really no reason to continue. There is no reason for me to want to start a relationship with someone who makes me uncomfortable right from the get go. A relationship is a project that both people have to work on together to make things turn out okay, but if you are still just dating then it is not that kind …
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:17 PM
12

I may be misinterpreting your point, but isn't the fact that the perceptions change when the gender changes the entire problem here?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:11 PM
3

I've only ever heard him referenced for the idea that sexuality is not black and white, straight and gay: the Kinsey Scale
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:44 PM
1

For me, the worst offender is the idea of "The Game" or "the Venusian arts" that is not at the core of men's rights, but seems to coincide a lot. The belief that dating, romancing, or hooking up is a game or an art form rather than, say, a conversation is not just misogynistic. I would dare to call the whole concept anti-human. Sex, love, and romance are supposed to be things that are mutually entered into and mutually enjoyed. If you have to play a game with someone or manipulate them into ente…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:40 PM
2

It's always safer to associate with causes over movements. A cause is an idea and can be judged by its own merits. A movement is an association of people acting and can be judged by the actions of people you have no control or influence over. I can't stand being judged based on the actions of people who have slight similarities to me.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:11 PM
1

The fashion industry is bullshit for a lot of reasons, but running onto a stage and assaulting a person in what is essentially their place of work is no way to behave.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:59 PM
1

For me, I must confess, it mostly had to do with the fact that for many months every MRA that I encountered was blatantly misogynist. I still do see plenty of misogynists present, but I don't always think it is right to judge a cause by the people you see supporting it. If the facts show that men are suffering simply for being men, then something must be done to combat that. I am spending more time on this sub lately, because I am seeing more rationality in the arguments and I am seeing facts th…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:22 PM
1

Why? Why should someone be encouraged to behave a certain way just because of their genitals?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:22 PM
1

I say "Fuck gender roles!" and I think all men's rights advocates should, too. Traditional gender roles are behind a bunch of the big issues that people are fighting on this sub, such as: men-only military draft, more workplace injuries for men because men traditionally work more dangerous jobs, and child custody going primarily to mothers.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:02 PM
1

Well I mean if you want to get technical about it no one is obligated to do anything except by legal or contractual bonds. Within those limits you can still be really damn rude, tho.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 06:47 PM
2

I see evident sexualization of a child, but I do not see exploitation.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:38 PM
5

We're not supposed to complain, we're just supposed to be compliant and take it (Which is quite ironic, because reading that it sounds like the female gender role of the past). I think acceptance of your status has almost always been considered a virtue for people of all genders and other roles. It is just the things we are expected to accept that are different.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:29 PM
1

Generally I have gotten the impression that sexism against men is enforced more by other men than it is by women. This is just my anecdotal experience, though.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:21 PM
7

You just made me think of this. My mom had one of these in her kitchen and called it the "boob light". She also referred to out gigantic 40yr-old dictionary as "the Big Dic". My mom is weird. Seriously though, with the power of the human imagination anything rod-shaped is a penis, anything round or domed is a breast, and just about anything can look like a vagina. I have even heard people discuss whether a single thing looked more like a penis or a vagina. The same thing! We can't pragmatically …
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:20 PM
12

Regardless of whether this content is appropriate for the sub (I'm keeping out of that because I'm new here), I think it is appropriate to pay attention to things that don't necessarily infringe on rights, but may have a strongly negative cultural impact. This would include many instances of legal yet harmful free speech.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:06 PM
1

It is actually the article that makes that sound wrong. "The queers", "the gays", "the blacks" all sound othering and prejudiced, but if you said "queer people", "gay people", or "black people" that would be fine. Specifically, queer has become a reclaimed term that homosexual, asexual, pansexual, transgender, intersex, polyamorous, genderqueer, and others can all identify under. I personally like identifying as queer.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:47 PM
1

It's not a non-issue if you are dating. Why would anyone date someone who doesn't acknowledge them as an individual? If you are just DTF then that's a whole different situation.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:38 PM
1

Except, I'm not. I know the terms I know because of the time I've spent in therapy.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:36 PM
1

A shirt that says "throw rocks at ___" is complete shit no matter who is wearing it.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:35 PM
3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygraph#Validity The impression I get is that is successfully measures heart rate and other "physiological indices", but that is has not been demonstrated to reliably match these with lying vs. truth-telling (weird observation for the day: why is there no verb for telling the truth?).
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:42 PM
1

Again it's the difference between liking someone for who they are and for what they represent. If some guy really likes that his girlfriend also is into women that is fine. If he's interested in voyeurism and she's comfortable with it that is fine. If he wants a 2girl3way and she's comfortable with it that is fine. What is not okay is fetishizing someone's sexuality. It's a subtle difference when put in words, but when someone is stereotyping you or not acknowledging your individuality it is usu…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:48 PM
1

Disclaimer: I didn't actually watch the video. Can I just say how sick I am of everything being a "War on ____". War is bad. War hurts people. War does collateral damage. War is not a good example of how to achieve peaceful change. War on drugs, war on christmas, war on women, war on terror. It's all bullshit (two of those are especially bullshit because they don't even exist).
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:08 PM
5

Do they allow food in the auditorium? Breastfeeding is feeding. It should be allowed anywhere food is allowed, but it does not need any special privileges beyond that.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:04 PM
4

As a gay man, I kind of see her point, though. What you say, wear, or do becomes very different depending on who you are. When a woman wears a shirt that says "I like boys" it is seen as an obvious fact and therefor her expression of that obvious fact makes her seem a bit shallow and boy-crazy. When I wear a shirt that says "I like boys" it expresses a fact that alters people's assumptions about me in a powerful way and exposes me to all sorts of comments or violence that may come my way because…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:27 PM
2

It's the difference between liking someone for who they are and liking someone for what they represent. Fetishizing someone's bisexuality is not really any different than fetishizing someone's race.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:22 PM
12

I don't disagree with anything else you're saying, but I just want to go on record saying that lie detector tests don't work. The confessions you get from someone afraid of submitting to a lie detector are actually much more reliable than the results you get from the test itself.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:17 PM
1

Personally, I don't like the idea of calling individuals suicide "victims". A more neutral way to express the same idea, and the way that is being used more by psychologists, would be "suicides completed".
/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:00 PM
1

When I run this with the current values of 2,551 points (52% like it) I get 62,775 total; 32,643 up; 30112 down. That is more votes than reddit is showing meaning that they are actually fudging the numbers down. 30k people downvoted that...
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:27 PM
1

If you really want to know how many votes something has then you have to calculate: eq1) total = up + down eq2) displayed = up - down eq3) up = like% * total the knowns are the like% and the displayed value. We have 3 equations and 3 unknowns; I think we can do this. So for instance right now this is showing 4 points (58% like it), 14 upvotes, 10 downvotes. so, let's say we want to solve for total first: eq2) 4 = up - down, do some shifting to get> down = up - 4 eq3) up = 0.58 * total eq1) total…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:21 PM
1

I do not support circumcision in First World countries, but I am not angry that it happened to me. I like my penis and the way it is now is the only way I have ever known it. I am interested to know what people think about the link between circumcision and STI prevention in areas with little or no access to condoms.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:58 PM
1

Ugh, NSFW [gore] That was grotesque. It makes a fair point, but ugh.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:53 PM
1

Educate and individual and you have taught an individual. What that individual chooses to do with that knowledge is dependent upon many different factors including genetics, upbringing, and culture.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:47 PM
2

This is actually pretty insulting to everyone, but particularly to female scientists.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:40 PM
2

I have only ever gotten one thing removed from Facebook and that was explicitly advocating violence against Arabs. Repeated usage of "faggot" and "cunt" doesn't appear to bother FB staff. My assumption is just that their policies are complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 09:26 PM
2

Don't Be That Guy Oh! I did not know about the specific "Don't Be That Guy" campaign. That makes more sense now.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:05 PM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/03/male-birth-control-reversible_n_1400708.html I feel like people should really be promoting this.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:44 PM
2

I was under the impression that both dude and guy are now considered primarily gender-neutral, yeah?
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:55 PM
0

I identify as liberal, but I totally support the self-ownership idea (though I may be the exception?). I'm a little unsure about heroin, though. I think it is more complex than the situation with weed, because of the greater likelihood to have an addict impose upon the rest of society via homelessness or medical expenses that they can't afford. If you want to link to a different subreddit for discussion I would be interested in learning more about the pros and cons.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 04:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter