TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SantaOrange Archive

View 14 posts and 414 comments by SantaOrange on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
71

Social IssuesSantaOrange/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:47 PM
61

Social IssuesSantaOrange/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:30 PM
54

Edu./Occu.SantaOrange/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:55 PM
54

Social IssuesSantaOrange/r/MensRights28/05/17 01:30 AM
47

Edu./Occu.SantaOrange/r/MensRights19/05/17 10:56 PM
38

Social IssuesSantaOrange/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:27 PM
24

Social IssuesSantaOrange/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:53 PM
21

FeminismSantaOrange/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:13 PM
11

FeminismSantaOrange/r/MensRights17/05/17 09:27 PM
7

FeminismSantaOrange/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:44 PM
6

GeneralSantaOrange/r/MensRights18/05/17 10:52 PM
5

Social IssuesSantaOrange/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:05 PM
3

FeminismSantaOrange/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:49 PM
2

FeminismSantaOrange/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:45 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Heh, fair enough.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 10:44 PM
1

Do you not think it possible that women themselves could embrace men's rights -- because it's in their own self-interest?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 10:10 PM
3

I shouldn't laugh but you're probably right.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:59 PM
5

Western women don't hate their own men. Feminists do not possess a limitless "depth of depravity". You could have fooled me. I have yet to see women standing up en masse to a single anti-male law. They're willing to stand up and wear Vagina hats when Donald Trump makes a boorish statement, but certainly not defend their sons. The longer this goes on, the more patriarchy is inevitable. Do you understand what I mean? I WANT women to do the right thing.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:56 PM
3

I can't see her hurting her son. I understand your argument but I disagree. You assume she's a complete fraud. I can imagine her taking delight in pinching and hurting a little boy.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:52 PM
1

Men didn't start this. That was Gloria Steinem, financed by the CIA. What were men supposed to do? Overthrow the government?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:46 PM
3

All the other kids with the pumped up kicks ... That's a great song. Let's hope if he becomes a "school shooter" he...I probably shouldn't finish that sentence. I can imagine Clem pinching him, hurting her boy -- because he's a WHITE MALE! I really, honestly think that child protective services need to keep a watch. But she'll probably just hurt him a little bit, every now and then, and leave no marks :(
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:42 PM
6

I think elites are betting on automation and immigration. Otherwise they would get serious about the problem. But even Japan -- which insists on no "immigration" aspect -- refuses to offer a carrot for men. Unwin did note that no society in history has reversed "female liberation." It's incredible, because here we have a legitimate reason for the Fermi Paradox.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:36 PM
1

Well, we agree on stopping the bombing I think, and that's what's important if we are ever to truly stop this madness. Especially when you consider that a lot of this bombing is for another country, namely Israel, but that's another subject. ;)
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:26 PM
2

Do you think she will? Ie raise her son like a normal mother and not abuse him? I'm frankly skeptical. Someone who hates males that much...she is going to abuse him in one way or another. I'm really opposed to state interventions, but I think it would be justified for CPS to take away the boy from that monster.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:23 PM
3

Yeah but aren't Muslims like 1 percent of the population in these countries? That doesn't seem anywhere close to doing what you describe. And note that I recognize the absurdity of inviting in people from the countries you are bombing...(easiest way to end the refugee situation would be to stop fucking bombing those countries).
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:20 PM
3

Well, I would be happy if she raised her son like a normal mother. But I'm rather disturbed by her whole "I hate men and want them dead" rhetoric.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:11 PM
2

ok I'll admit it. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:00 PM
7

Actually, if anything I think this might be proof there is a God and that he has a sense of humour. LOL. That would be wonderful :)
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:58 PM
5

Why the downvote? The title was meant to be ironic. Anyway, you're a very kind person. I too hope that Clementine Ford realizes the error of her ways. But let's be honest here: all evidence points toward her being human slime.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:55 PM
3

That's all fine and well, but you don't control the law. One false move and you are fucked.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:43 PM
6

lol keep your weirdo subs to yourself.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:13 PM
5

This isn't about "getting chicks". Many of us already have chicks. I'm talking about the future of civilization, or whether there will even be a future of civilization.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:12 PM
2

I hear that alot, but is it really plausible that Muslims will gradually take over the West? I understand that elites want the most "diverse" population possible -- in order to more easily divide people -- but the people at the top of the pyramid are certainly not Muslims.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:01 PM
2

Luckily there is no extradition treaty.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:59 PM
5

Alas, the term "white men" refers to all white men, not just white male "losers." Sorta like the term "Jews." So for example one might say, "I hate Donald Rumsfeld, but I love Emma Goldman." You're still referring to the same group.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:54 PM
8

I'm married lol.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:32 PM
34

This is nothing short of horrific. Imagine the human scum that create these posters...
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:56 PM
0

Pretty sure Roger Ebert had it on his "best 100 movies" before he died. The film has aged exquisitely. There are two possibilities. Superman rocks. Or you're a douche. Edit: sorry, mix up.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:45 PM
1

isn't for cutting sandwiches Why? Why can't she cut the sandwich! In fact, forget Subway or your local Deli, Wonder Woman could probably make a kickass sandwich. I like the idea of fantastical characters placed in a realistic setting much more than putting them in a silly world. I suppose the reverse wouldn't be very entertaining: a silly world with boring characters ;) But again you're missing the point: WW getting naked.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:59 PM
8

Disgusting. Who owns and runs this appalling website?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 07:09 AM
-1

Grow some balls.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:40 AM
1

In all seriousness, men need to spread their legs. Not in an exaggerated fashion but yes, more than parallel. Anyone who says otherwise wants to crush man-ballz, and that's not even getting into things like center of gravity. I can't believe I'm actually debating this. God feminists are so disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:26 AM
–

Fuck you. I need to spread bitch.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:13 AM
–

Fuck you, i NEED to sit like that. Or at last I enjoy it.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:03 AM
1

Why I'm enjoying a Foster's right now, cunt, and...no I can't make it work. It's probably not that bad. But no one will ever know....
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:00 AM
8

she insisted on putting down the arm rest between us LMAO. Big guy problems ;) No I hear you. All the seats were set to "average", so big guys are shit out of luck.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:41 AM
–

There's no shame in having tiny, tiny balls. In fact the song "Tinker Bells" was made in your honor.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:25 AM
–

Who isn't?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:11 AM
–

She was actually kinda haught in her earlier days ;)
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:08 AM
6

"tiny testicles" it is!
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:06 AM
–

Are you a eunuch? if not, reach down, find your balls. The rest will go from there.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:24 PM
8

That's actually a myth, the whole sand thing. It was actually just done to blunt sexual pleasure. Interesting! If what you say is true...MGM was popularized by by the Eugenist Harvey Kellogg in the US. Will check out your link.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:03 PM
15

Done. No wait! I don't have that kind of authority...
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:01 PM
11

I think most Jewish people will agree that circumcision began as a utilitarian measure by people LIVING IN THE DESSERT. Sand and foreskin don't go well together. By the same token, pork was "outlawed" by "God" due to parasites in the meat. Most forms of religious literalism are irrational. No, "God" didn't create the universe in a week. And no, you shouldn't slice up your baby's genitals. If one wants to continue the tradition you can do it symbolically or with a pin prick. No need to hurt your …
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:10 PM
4

mothers have negative stereotypes as well. They do? Such as?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:39 PM
182

We all seem to be missing a rather important fact. When women hog seats with their bags or spread their legs they are simply being inconsiderate slobs. When men spread their legs they are doing so because of biology. Men have differently shaped hips and a higher center of gravity. Moreover crushing the testes causes infertility. Men who take public transport every day NEED to spread their legs. The campaign against "manspreading" is the persecution of men on public transport for their physiology…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:34 PM
17

Hear hear. All studies show that men are crucial to child rearing. Bugs the hell out of feminists, but there it is.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:28 PM
4

Also, to those saying that only fathers are ever looked down on in media, that's simply not true. Certainly fathers are often portrayed as buffoonish You just contradicted yourself genius.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:27 PM
17

If a single mother becomes single through no choice of her own (eg her husband dies in a plane crash) she should be praised. Single mothers who get knocked up by some thug or willingly divorce their husbands and steal his earnings are the villains of society. Edit: that also applies to these horrible wenches who get married, have a kid, divorce their husband then shack up with new baby daddy. Utterly despicable.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:16 PM
3

Mrs. Doubtfire is part comedy, part horror film. The Sally Fields character is the villain.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:13 PM
1

Use more clear language, that will help you in future. I have no idea what your argument is.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:09 PM
1

Google = CIA. Do the math.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:04 PM
6

he landed the spaceship (poorly) LMAO And other such series have produced the reverse result. Females would last about five minutes without men. Men perform roughly 97 percent of the jobs that keep civilization functioning. But you keep pretending you're a strong independent feminist womynz lol.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:39 PM
8

Just. Simply. Shut up. Or provide evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:26 PM
7

You were downvoted but your post is the sensible one.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:31 PM
8

Yeah but "SJW" is a euphemism for "feminist."
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:20 PM
2

Not sure if this works: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dutch+survivor+men+vs+women
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:38 AM
2

My dad never gave me those problems. That's probably your issue.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:58 AM
4

Feminism at its root is a rebranding of Marxism More like a perversion of Marxism. Marx devoted very little time to women at all. Indeed the first major critique of feminism was written by a Marxist (Earnest Belford Bax). its fundamental tenet requires the oppressor/oppressed narrative This is true. The problem is that, as Warren Farrell put it, women are the only "oppressed group that owns more luxury items than their oppressors." and demands equality of outcome. Not at all. Feminists do not de…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:39 AM
9

I would accept your premise ("well meaning") if they hadn't been exposed to the data. They have, repeatedly, by banned posters. Ignorance is therefore no longer a defense, and the mods should be considered complicit in the oppression of men and boys. If anything they are worse than the overt man-haters. They pretend to care and offer solutions. “Will you walk into my parlor?” said the spider to the fly; “’Tis the prettiest little parlor that ever you did spy. The way into my parlor is up a windi…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:17 AM
5

She could have at least defended Elam a little bit Yes I agree with this too. Her only defense was that he was "eccentric." The bottom line is that Warren Farrell tried the gentle approach for decades and we got nowhere. Elam's over the top rhetoric appears to have been motivated not only by (righteous) anger but strategy. This is something that his critics conveniently ignore. They also ignore the fact that his provocative writings are kid's play compared to earnest statements by highly influen…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:03 AM
84

Imagine how big a douche bag you'd have to be to try to ruin a man's life over a T-shirt after he lands a spacecraft on a comet. Feminists are like spoiled children. They show zero gratitude for the countless luxuries and privileges men bestow upon them through their hard work, innovations and sacrifice. Sometimes I wish we could perform a society-wide experiment like that Dutch survivor episode where the sexes were segregated and left on separate islands. The women were helpless. Only when a ma…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:55 AM
5

Excellent piece.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:48 AM
8

I don't see any need for someone like Cassie to be deliberately provocative (that's what Paul Elam is for) but I think she could have been a little more strident in her objections during the TV appearance in Oz. She could have simply said, "well women also abuse and kill their children. In fact there have been several recent cases of mothers murdering their children here in Australia. The point is that domestic violence is not a gendered issue as feminists claim, and we cannot solve the problem …
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:41 AM
12

We're all trying to be better people and better men than this Would they say the same of women who have abortions or give their kids up for adoption? Methinks not. MensLib is analogous to a site set up by white supremacists to "help" black people. Personally I think we should stop giving them any attention at all except to mock them on subs like SRSsucks.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:13 AM
1

I am actually doing a you tube series on this currently. link?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:16 AM
33

root of the problem, which is male aggression Actually, women perform the majority of child abuse/murder. Cassie was actually being diplomatic. Perhaps she should have been less so.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:04 AM
35

By far the worst and most dishonest review yet, and that's saying something. He even calls the film "dangerous"! It never ceases to amaze me how many spineless, self-loathing men are willing to throw their entire gender under the bus in order to play white knight. Edit: I upvoted just to highlight the human excrement we're dealing with in our opposition.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:03 AM
5

Read the Amnesty International Report. Legalization prostitution would make sex workers much safer. The war on drugs is a good analogy. When it's decriminalized we see a huge drop in organized crime, violence, police corruption and even use of the drug itself. See Portugal for an example. allow for the objectification of a woman's body. Male bodies are objectified in the workplace every day. Do you support banning construction, fishing, logging etc? In all of these cases (far more dangerous than…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:17 AM
8

What happened, actually, was while radical feminists were pushing for the ERA's ratification, highly conservative, traditional (I'm gonna guess anti-feminists) pushed HARD back at them and it was unable to pass legislature. Yes that's what happened. My question was why feminists suddenly dropped it and have scarcely brought it up since. They seem to be too busy focussing on things like "manspreading." My point is that the leadership of the feminist movement doesn't really want "equality" -- it w…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:12 AM
5

We are mainly gender critical, anti porn-industry, anti-kink (such as BDSM, DDLG), anti-sex work, etc. I don't mean to be cruel, but it is because of people like you that female sex workers continue to be placed in such danger. In countries where sex work is criminalized the workers are much less safe. That's why the overwhelming majority want the practice legalized. Amnesty International even admitted as much. The war on sex work is about as effective as the war on drugs. In pornography, or any…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:01 AM
2

I appreciate them only because without them I would not be sitting here with rights today Why do you think that? Women have always had rights. You wouldn't know it from reading feminist literature, which is almost 100 percent horeshit, but it's true. Here's a good academic paper on the subject: http://www.academia.edu/746242/Favoured_or_oppressed_Married_women_property_and_coverturein_England_1660_1800 Women simply had a different set of rights, privileges and obligations than men. Men in power …
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:56 AM
9

I believe that if we dismantle gender roles It's never gonna happen, and certainly not via feminism, though theoretically an egalitarian movement with a heavy emphasis on the neglected male side of the equation could make inroads toward your goal. Gender roles arise due to biology. Have you heard of the Israeli Kibbutz? It was an anarchist experiment that included the abolition of gender roles. There were zero social expectations enforced by any authority for males or females to pursue "traditio…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:51 AM
7

Have you ever heard of the ERA? Yes. Why aren't feminists pushing it? It appears that they got cold feet after they realized that women would have to give up a whole slew of privileges. As for "branches", the root of feminism is patriarchy theory, ie the demonstrably false claim that men in power try to privilege other men, even at the expense of their own mothers. That's a hateful idea and frankly absurd given the tendency of men throughout history to give their lives to serve and protect women…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:44 AM
3

Everyone knows Trans women aren't biologically female. People are essentially just trying to show them a little compassion. However I agree that it is absurd that trans "women" are participating in female sports, and the legislation in Canada demanding that people use "preferred pronouns" is potentially very dangerous.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:39 AM
6

When I am referencing rape culture, the things that pop into my head are sex trafficking, pornography, childhood sexual abuse, etc. That's not the definition embraced by most feminists. They claim that the West condones, excuses or even supports the rape of women. Pornography? Porn is associated with a vast reduction in sexual abuse against women. The biggest money makers in the porn industry are women and many now own and run the companies.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:35 AM
4

Second and third wave feminism were amazing. I assume you meant to say "first" and "second wave". The founder of the first wave in the US was Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who claimed that "we are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men." As for the second wave, the founder of the first gender studies course, Sally Miller Gearhart, literally advocated genocide against men and boys. If anything the third wave is tame by comparison, though feminists now have much more institutional power so we are now see…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:33 AM
7

rape adds to rape culture. There's no such thing as "rape culture" -- at least not in the way feminists claim. It exists in some contexts -- war zones for example, or male prisons and juvenile detention facilities. But certainly not on college campuses. Our society takes rape (of women, not men or boys) so seriously that politicians are trying to reverse due process rights for men accused of the crime, turning our entire legal system on its head.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:27 AM
9

Privilege? Sure. We currently live in a flawed system. In divorce courts, women almost always are granted alimony. In child custody cases, women are much more likely to be granted custody than men. Men have a higher suicide rate than women. They also are required to register for the draft. In domestic violence cases, men are typically seen as the abusers and therefore tend to get arrested more often than not. Are you aware that it is feminists that have created these inequalities? For example in…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:22 AM
20

What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor. "Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fall apart—and it's healthy," Brown said. "But guys are not allowed to fall apart." Ironically, she explained, men are often pressured to open up a…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 11:56 PM
6

There is at least one male gender trait that has clearly become toxic in the current environment -- placing the needs of women above those of men. Feminists have ruthlessly and shamelessly exploited male altruism in order to create an anti-male society. We now live in a de facto gynocracy. The fundamental problem is that women do not appear to have anywhere near the same degree of empathy toward men as vice versa -- in fact an alarming number seem to feel nothing but contempt and hatred toward t…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 11:31 PM
52

If "toxic" (ie traditional) masculinity is to blame, why wasn't there a suicide epidemic back in the 1950's when traditional gender roles were much stronger than today? No. The reality is that the male gender role has been destroyed, leaving men with no sense of purpose. Boys are being raised without fathers, treated like defective girls, discriminated against in college and the workplace; men relentlessly demonized in the media, divorce-raped and denied access to their kids, offered no support …
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:33 PM
9

Well feminists would say patriarchy is a social system in which males hold primary power And here's where they make their fundamental error. They assume that men in power try to privilege other men. The exact opposite is true: men have out-group bias toward women. That explains why feminists were able to create so many anti-male laws using politicians as their proxies. We now live in a gynocracy as a result. and predominate in roles of political leadership See above. moral authority Women have a…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:18 PM
1

Better yet don't reply at all, lest you embarrass yourself.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:44 AM
8

Well, I don't demonize Muslims (look at my post history), nor Jews, nor blacks. And I participate in this sub. My posts are mostly upvoted. People from all political persuasions participate here, so you will indeed see eg the "all Muslims are teh evilz!" in addition to every other form of bigotry. But on balance I think we are pretty fair. MRM figures like Karen Straughan and Dr. Randomercam have criticized the idea that Muslims are a bunch of misogynists; I have highlighted groups like Jews aga…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:17 AM
1

Well then we agree on that score.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:25 AM
6

Please don't parrot the PC revisionism. They're called "facts." This has nothing to do with political correctness. Are you female by chance? No.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:23 AM
1

And the word liberal meant a person favoring individual freedom, both socially and economically That depends on your definition of the word "freedom." The original liberal intellectuals like John Locke thought it just that poor children go to work from the age of three. They also thought poverty was necessary in order to force those "lazy" poor people to work. Roosevelt betrayed the movement and changed to progressive ideas Are you referring to Teddy Roosevelt? Teddy tried to break up some of th…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:41 AM
13

It's an interesting theory and I admire Peterson's audacity for stating it out loud. But he may be missing a more simple explanation that accords with his earlier one: namely feminists view Muslims as victims and therefore in need of support. In other words it may be more shocking naiveté than some sort of subconscious lust to be dominated. Another obvious issue that many Muslims have been victimized by Western governments. Literally millions of Muslim people have been killed in often unnecessar…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:34 AM
23

What's the problem? Sex is just a social construct! This is what happens when you value feelz before realz. You know what'd be really interesting -- if a transgender female entered a female chess tournament...;) Edit: come to think of it, why are there female chess tournaments? It's not as though brute strength is a factor. When I saw this issue come up on TwoX, the answer was that the "goal is to get women interested in chess, and they find it intimidating competing in male tournaments." O'Real…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:26 AM
8

User is named "Critical Thinking" LMAO.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:13 AM
2

Link to study? I'd be interested in seeing that.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 02:34 AM
12

Women are taught from infancy that if they ever face a problem in life it is "because they are a woman." They certainly aren't taught about their privileges. So they end up falsely gendering issues that men also face (often in more severe forms).
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:53 AM
13

Women talk more than men. Much, much, much more. Ergo they get interrupted more often, what a shocker. If you feel like you're being unjustly talked over then be more assertive. Don't expect everyone else to adjust their behavior to accommodate your insecurity. This seems to be a big problem for women and feminists in particular. The world doesn't revolve around you. Man up and stop whining. You wanted "equality", now fucking deal with it.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:49 AM
18

Article is from last year. And yes it's bullshit. Judging from this sub there is a pretty even mix of people from a wide range of political ideologies. That's a good sign, actually, because it shows we are not motivated by ideology but a desire for equal treatment under the law.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 12:57 AM
5

The word "libertarian" was first used in the United States by a French anarchist. It used to refer to Proudhon/mutualist anarchists who opposed both capitalism and state power. Then the term was appropriated by utopian capitalists like Murray Rothbard and Ayn Rand. I agree with the "libertarians" on a great many issues. But they are a mess when it comes to economics; sorta like the flip side of Marxists. The original libertarians had a better grasp on human nature, perhaps because they lived in …
/r/MensRights16/06/17 12:37 AM
2

Begone Feminazi.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:07 PM
4

Yes they are misandrists and yes the oppose men and boys achieving equal rights. The cutesy "misandry time" phrases are supposed to be ironic (as in: of COURSE we don't hate men!); but if you read their posts it rapidly becomes clear that they are exactly as advertised. Think of it like a board for white supremacists with "ironic" statements about black people and Jews.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:47 AM
13

Predictably awful. Not worth reading unless you're a masochist or are interested in propaganda techniques. No comment section of course.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:34 AM
2

And slow clap as well for /u/girlwriteswhat for linking this utter piece of garbage.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 08:03 AM
3

Wow. Until this point I rarely found myself disagreeing with Janice Fiamengo but this is really low on her part. She even admits at feeling schadenfreude (shameful, sadistic joy) at the persecution of Weinstein for his principled actions. Why? Because apparently one has to be a right wing ideologue in order to receive support by people like Fiamengo. Weinstein is not an SJW -- he teaches evolutionary biology. And Fiamengo's contention that blacks have no legitimate grievances at all in modern Am…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:50 PM
–

women are cowardly and lack honor You missed the part about men acting without honor and killing innocent people. You're a dunce. Even when someone spells something out for you you still don't see it. Fucking imbecile.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:53 AM
1

Funding of disease research is a separate issue Wow. Just wow. You are, sir, pathetic. I have nothing else to say to you.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:25 AM
1

Right, but, they flatly do have higher maintenance bodies. Actually prostate cancer is funded at a much lower rate than breast cancer. So your "theory" is simply wrong. I'll try to get to the rest of your stuff in a sec.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:17 AM
1

What about gay men? What about them? I've never heard of an MRA hating on gay people. MRA's support gay rights, and many MRA's are gay. But we don't think special privileges. Men are men. The fact that men pay more taxes could easily be rebuffed with the fact that men generally make more money Um, that was the point. Men work longer hours in more difficult and dangerous jobs and so make more money. And pay more taxes. Health care may benefit women disproportionately There's no "may" about it. Si…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:59 AM
2

Steinem herself admitted that she was funded by the CIA after the expose in the Village Voice. There's a difference between a "conspiracy theory" and a conspiracy fact.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 09:24 PM
3

I'll try to get back to you tomorrow.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 02:45 PM
6

She is a disgusting pig, and should be voted out immediately.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:03 AM
2

And yes I also agree that there is a "natural" equilibrium for the majority.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:46 AM
3

I never argued for "forcing" anything on anyone. So I guess we agree.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:43 AM
4

both men and women rely on each other. Well, I didn't want to insult MGTOW, because I get it, I really do. But at the same time when I view the MGTOW forums there's just so much anti-woman hate. What is the point? Let's assume that the most extreme MGTOW folks are right. Well, it makes about as much sense to be angry at a cat for playing with mice. The marriage/divorce stuff, I get it, but I think men and women need each other. Call me a romantic. We need to solve this problem together. And yes,…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:31 AM
5

You're right, and the upvotes prove it.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 01:59 AM
15

Nailed it. There is something to be said for honesty, even when you're a horrible biatch.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:53 PM
–

Sorry, got you mixed up with another poster. The incredible but real fact is that those horrible "white men" are treated much, much worse than even black women. So that puts a bit of a crimp in the whole feminist intersectionality nonsense.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:28 PM
–

We don't agree then. Studies show that black women are treated with much more compassion than white men in the legal system. That's right -- those dreaded white men.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:18 PM
–

Well then we agree.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:45 PM
2

What about men of color?
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:42 PM
2

I'm from Latvia. Potatoes are our national dish.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:19 PM
2

That sounds funny now, but just you wait until the apocalypse...
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:06 PM
7

Goddamit. I was just about to bite into a burrito you asshole! Now I have to go eat my traditional ethnic dish: potato.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:10 PM
20

The Irish people were "historically oppressed." Irish Americans were called "white niggers" and had to perform the most dangerous jobs because slaves were considered valuable property. The great American abolitionist Frederick Douglass was able to buy his freedom from slavery due to donations from the Irish. He visited the country during the potato famine and found them highly sympathetic to his plight. It was also at that time that he realized it wasn't only African Americans who were oppressed…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 02:57 PM
6

and let's be honest, crappy fathers that abandon their children True enough. But a brutally honest interpretation of (actual) dead beat fathers (as opposed to fathers who have been alienated from their children, drift away because they do not have equal access, are victims of false accusations, can't find a job etc. etc.) must surely recognize that it is women, not men, who are the gatekeepers to sex. In times passed, wise old grandmothers would warn young women about falling prey to the charms …
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:56 AM
3

You really should do Youtube videos. Or create a blog if you don't like the camera. Hilarious stuff.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:44 AM
16

Privilege theory. I know I'm supposed to say MGM or boys falling behind in school or fathers being denied access to their children or false rape accusations etc. But it's the combination of all of these human rights violations with the idea that men are privileged at the same time that most enrages me. Especially when it's coming from gender studies professors who have never done a hard day's work in their lives, teaching in buildings built by men, some of whom probably died in the job during co…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:33 AM
1

I'm male so if it's sexist, I'm sexist against myself I guess? In all likelihood. Studies show that males have outgroup bias toward females, whereas the same is not true in reverse. Another study showed that both men and women would rather throw a hypothetical man off a bridge than a woman. But it's definitely not sexist to describe how society is built. Not sure what you mean by this.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:13 AM
8

Two wrongs don't make a right. Perhaps you should have said that in your original statement to avoid confusion. I'm all for prison reform and more emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment but it needs to go both ways. And frankly I'm not convinced that a woman willing to throw a baby in a dumpster rather than just drop it off at a safe-haven is unlikely to engage in additional horrible crimes.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:11 AM
2

But power itself is held up by patriarchy, racism, capitalism, etc There is no such thing as "the patriarchy". It's a figment of your imagination. Capitalism is a system of oppression that should be opposed. Racism should be opposed. You can't oppose "the patriarchy" because it doesn't exist. Feminism is a struggle for the complete abolishment of gender You may as well ask gay men to "pray the gay away". Gender is a product of biology. When the Israeli Kibbutz abolished gender roles they assumed…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:09 AM
5

Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and social dominance: a possible explanation for the feminist paradox https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158978/ So essentially, yes. A lot of hardcore feminists (ironically) have very masculine qualities and are envious/resentful toward the opposite sex. Of course that doesn't explain all the other women who embrace feminism. There are a variety of reasons for said embrace: ugly women who hate men because they are not p…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:55 AM
13

Apparently gay guys can be white knights too. You may want to try posting this speech from a gay conference in 1976 called "dangerous trends in feminism." It presages many of our current problems. http://paganpressbooks.com/jpl/DTF.HTM
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:46 AM
14

Um, you could say that about any number of male offenders who are sentenced to long terms over comparatively trivial crimes. But yeah, attempted murder? No biggie.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:42 AM
1

I'm not sure about being an MRA but I am anti feminist. Are you a WRA? Ie do you support women having rights? The MRM is simply the male version. The stigma surrounding the term derives entirely from slander and disinformation by feminists. But yeah, ultimately titles don't really matter so long as you support reform. Some people here have expressed the sentiment that women are incapable of loving and empathising with a man. I don't agree with that sentiment and nor I imagine do most MRA's. I do…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:38 AM
1

Your argument makes no sense. It's like saying black murder victims deserve no empathy if their murderers are black. Only a feminist could come up with a suck a grotesquely sexist argument. I can only surmise that you think if women were placed in power then massacres would suddenly disappear? I'm afraid that history doesn't support your argument. Queens were even more likely to send men and boys off to die than kings.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:31 AM
1

Exactly. They don't appear to be realize that men will not be content to suffer this abuse forever. Something has to change. If they don't cooperate with us -- and ultimately the policies we support (such as shared parenting)will actually help women -- they are going to have to face another beast entirely. The "dark enlightenment" types, should they achieve power, will create a society that makes The Handmaid's Tale look like a feminist utopia. And the far (far) right will take power eventually …
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:23 AM
54

That just means the people who did the choosing have a form of racist misogynist ESP! Or perhaps there's something fundamentally wrong with choosing the best person for the job? Feminists have already pretty much embraced the latter view in the name of "promoting diversity." In fact they are getting so insane they're literally attacking the idea of logic itself. There was a good honey badgers episode on this phenomenon recently. They examined a paper by a feminist "academic" in which she argued …
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:15 AM
6

Nice.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 02:38 AM
6

From the comments: The "turning the tables" argument is irrelevant because it suggests that historically there has always been measurable equal treatment among the sexes and that simply isn't the case. Historically women, wives and daughters, were considered property. Women have had the right to vote for less than 100 years. How long is the stigma of this status supposed to last? An hour after suffrage? 50 years? Near as I can see, women still suffer as second class citizens in a number of areas…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 02:36 AM
4

women's independence Women aren't independent. Men perform about 95% of the labor that keeps civilization functioning. Moreover women comprise a net drain on the state via social services paid for primarily by men. This means that women are just as dependent on men as they were during the stone age. By the same token men are entirely dependent on women to keep the species going. Granted women now have the illusion of independence, and the state (via forced taxation against mostly men) will provi…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 02:08 AM
1

Interesting essay, though dazzlingly gynocentric. Imagine writing a piece about how feminist policies result in the imprisonment of innocent people and focussing exclusively on women!
/r/MensRights05/06/17 01:38 AM
14

Hahaha. There was just a post here yesterday from Cosmo magazine describing what a "real man" is. Just more tiresome double standards.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:52 AM
1

Awesome. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:50 AM
2

Ah, that makes sense.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:33 AM
4

Interesting. Do you have a source?
/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:05 AM
3

This doesn't really explain why though, does it? The superstition about pigs probably arose due parasites in pork. What is the dominant theory about why MGM was mandated? In the US it was popularized by a Eugenicist who argued that it would help curb masturbation. It wouldn't surprise me of both male and female MGM arose due to a desire to decrease promiscuity (and therefore increase social cohesion).
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:48 PM
1

I agree with the premise but the paper, in addition to having numerous grammatical errors, only focusses on women's rights. And yes it does make perfect sense -- if you are paid a fat pay check to promote feminism.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:22 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:05 PM
8

You can't support men's rights without opposing a great many laws that feminists have passed and supporting a great many that they have blocked. But so long as you support reform I don't think it matters what you call yourself.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 10:51 PM
4

looks great! Edit: I was just thinking that there needs to be an American equivalent of Canada's CAFE. Perhaps one big umbrella organization to unite all the disparate men's issues groups in the US. I'm aware of the National Organization for Men but they seem to be rather low key.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 10:34 PM
37

Female MRA's are real examples of "strong independent women", as opposed to the fainting couch snowflakes that make up the modern feminist movement. They not only resist the temptation to play damsel in distress but they subvert gender roles by acting on behalf of men. They seek actual equality rather than endless privilege. I would go so far as to say that they are the actual "feminists" -- if feminists acted in accord with the dictionary definition of their ideology -- which they never have, n…
/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:30 PM
5

I hesitate to say this, but it also strikes me as a peculiarly feminine solution" A feminine solution is fine, provided we don't have a state and laws and prison. Right now they are trying to combine "feminine solutions" with the brutal reality of the "masculine" state. I'll wait for these feminists to demand that men receive equal treatment to women in the criminal "justice" system, and that they stop running to the "patriarchy" to pass new oppressive laws.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 09:16 AM
2

Which is the more honorable position?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 09:08 AM
1

Probably more likely that he was able to break through because he did a stint at Business International Corporation, a known CIA front company (only one journalist, the leftist John Pilger, had the balls to point this out). No one attains the Presidency unless a sufficient number of power brokers have decided they will play ball. Obama also had symbolic value. Before Obama was elected, Henry Kissinger appeared on Charlie Rose and chuckled "think of the symbolism." In other words the plebs will t…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:32 AM
5

Time to abandon ship?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:27 AM
13

Even if it were true that men didn't face "historical oppression" due to their sex (it isn't -- oppression means "prolonged unjust or cruel treatment" -- and I'm pretty sure being forced under penalty of execution to fight and die in wars qualifies) their argument still doesn't make sense. There is no reason why a particular group can't suddenly face a new form of "oppression" in the here and now -- after all, "systemic oppression" has to start at some moment in time. Ironically the decision of …
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:26 AM
1

Refreshing reply. Glad to you enjoyed it.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:19 AM
2

I would argue that society values men for both brains and brawns. They may value individual men with brains and brawn, as they should. It's nice that at least some men are valued for something, or at least they used to be before feminism (now all men are de facto "oppressors"). But not every man has brains and/or brawn. Every woman has a womb and neoteny. And women can be just as fiercely protective of their children and their man as any man may feel protective towards a woman. That may be true …
/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:05 AM
2

Sure I'll explain. She is assuming that females are "devalued" in our society, and that indeed society hates women. As a result, when a boy acts in a stereotypically feminine fashion, it is effectively "blowback." That is, the problem arises because we value masculinity but denigrate femininity. This is, of course, ridiculous. Not only do we value females, we value them simply for existing. The same is not true of males, who are the "disposable sex" and have to earn value through work (ideally w…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:12 AM
8

If anything, they state the opposite: that "men" (governing men, really) get upset when a dollar goes to helping women--namely the recent attempts to defund planned parenthood. This is hilariously backwards. We have countless programs to help women and girls and virtually none for helping men and boys. It's also funny that you used health care as an example, since much more money is spent on female health care than male -- and not just for reproductive issues. Eg much more money is spent on brea…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:53 AM
3

"Housewife" would be the hottest new job in town. It already is. The "New American Dream" for women is to become a housewife, and studies show that housewives are happier than any other female demographic. The reality is that women got played. Feminists acted in a petulant fashion, claimed men were oppressing them, and most women went along for the ride because they thought the grass would be greener on the other side. Now female unhappiness is at an all time high. Who to blame for this clusterf…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:32 AM
2

Gotta say, if this is patriarchy we live in, it's incredibly ineffective. That's only because men are incompetent idiots in addition to being brutal oppressors ;) Seriously though, if men actually wanted to oppress women in the manner feminists claim we could make fairly short work of it. We could create something ten times worse than the Handmaid's Tale in about two weeks.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:21 AM
2

Thanks for the rec. Haven't heard of that one.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:14 AM
17

I don't really buy into the "men have it much better in Muslim societies and women are treated like slaves" narrative propagated by the right. Muslim societies are patriarchal, meaning both sexes have disadvantages and privileges (they still abide by "women and children first" in life or death situations in which everyone is at risk, for example). Feminist societies are matriarchal, but there is no corresponding privileges for males that females receive under patriarchy. We didn't switch "women …
/r/MensRights03/06/17 12:57 AM
6

You see where I’m headed? Lack of self esteem? To the men in the class these co-eds were saying, “While you men struggle with pornography, lust, pride and anger we women struggle with not thinking highly enough of ourselves.” lol. That's gold. I don't have a link but I recall a study posted here that was conducted I think in the late 90's. It asked men and women which sex was superior at X, Y and Z. Both men and women said that women were "more creative" (hmmm...where are all those female invent…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 12:24 AM
10

So we now have dozens of studies all showing the same thing: shared parenting is in the best interests of the child. This means that feminists are knowingly harming children in order to...what? Harm fathers? That appears to be the only "justification" for continued opposition. Or perhaps they just can't accept the idea that fathers are crucial to child rearing beyond providing material support? Even more remarkable is that these same studies also demonstrate that shared parenting helps the mothe…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:52 PM
8

Yep. She thought the Best Buy worker was "beneath" her and it offended her that he would dare ask her out. Far from being "strong and independent", feminists are constantly running to the big bad patriarchy they supposedly hate (the state in most cases, but basically the nearest male authority figure) and demanding that he/it solve their problems, no matter how trifling. They are unable to express any agency at all except by proxy. Like little girls running to the teacher to tattle-tale on a cla…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:40 PM
81

"old white guys" I'll never understand how feminists have such an easy time scapegoating white men. I mean, these women (almost all of whom are themselves white) have fathers right? Brothers? Sons? They have so little character that they are willing to thrown their own "loved" ones under the bus in order to play damsel in distress. It's pathetic.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:45 PM
17

So basically, she thinks we should do a complete gender-role flip on what was the norm until recently and raise our sons to serve women? It's not a gender flip. Men have always served women in some capacity or other. The difference is that in the old days women were expected to reciprocate.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 06:08 PM
31

Tell him/her to go fuck themselves. Alternatively, refer to female rape victims. Three different studies in Canada show that the solid majority of incarcerated male rapists were abused by women as children. Wanna stop rape? Pay attention to female pedos!
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:41 AM
–

Cool. So you cornered the bitch. What a horrible person. That dude was like, "I'm here to learn about suicide," and she hectored him to no end. That bitch should apologize.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:48 PM
–

Is that the same biatch? Well let her live in eternal shame. Perhaps it's better we don't know the identity of the stoical young man, berated by the bitach, who simply wanted to do what he had to do. Amen.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:00 PM
–

No I recognize Dan, I'm talking about the guy who is just trying to go about his day, and some crazy feminist bitch is spitting in his face, "YOU ARE FUCKING SCUM."
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:22 PM
–

Word salad much? Learn to read. at no point have you offered a single shred of evidence for your position. Here's some evidence: a mother stroking a boy's head. Get it now, retard? You are autistic beyond words.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:44 PM
9

You are a star, Karen. Never give up what you are doing.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:02 PM
3

Indeed.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:48 PM
1

As it turns out though, by pushing this "naturally better" narrative Not at all. I keep saying that women are better at being "soft" and therefore soothing and defusing a potentially violent situation. At no point did I claim that women are "superior". You're just projecting your own feelings of inferiority onto women. I regard both sexes as equal.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:44 PM
3

Elam didn't "provoke" me. I wish Elam the best. I'm saying that just as men are best at eg building sky-scrapers, women are best at being soft and gentle and calming. That's it.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:29 PM
3

Bravo.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:23 PM
4

You gotta be kidding me. Of course Paul is being "deliberately provocative." That's his whole schtick, and I don't begrudge him of that. Without Paul's deliberately provocative antics we wouldn't have "The Red Pill." Yes, women are better suited to certain tasks, including calming someone down. That's because men get into pissing contests. That doesn't mean men are in any way "inferior", it just means that sometimes we need a woman's touch.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:57 PM
2

Why not TLDR it for us? I'm pretty sure young American men would like to know why -- in the case of an emergency -- they should die for the state.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:00 PM
4

The great capitalists financed second wave feminism. That's probably something you should know. The Ford and Rockefeller foundations pumped millions into feminism and "gender studies." Hell the CIA even financed Gloria Steinem and Ms. Magazine, as she herself admitted after the Village Voice published an expose. I'm afraid it's more complicated than "left" vs "right".
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:50 PM
10

Er, conscription. Only men are required to sign up for Selective Service.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:48 PM
11

lol if you think the Cons are gonna help you. This is from the UK Con Party's manifesto: We have done much in recent years to break down longstanding divisions in our country. Yet some social injustices endure [ ... ] If you are a woman, you will earn less than a man. Extremism, especially Islamist extremism, strips some British people, especially women, of the freedoms they should enjoy ... We will take measures to close the gender pay gap. We will require companies with more than 250 employees…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:42 PM
3

They're not socialists. That would require some sort of pretense to equality of outcome. Let me know when these "socialist" feminists demand equal negative outcomes for women, be it in the courts or workplace or elsewhere.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:14 PM
4

This is actually a pretty interesting debate. Paul is being deliberately provocative as usual. But beyond the gynocentrism angle there is the question of how best to defuse a potentially violent situation with a mentally disturbed man. Ironically I think women are best suited to this task. There was a recent case of a man threatening people on the subway, and an elderly woman stepped in, put her hand on his shoulder, and calmed him down. The man started crying. I think if more women were willing…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:01 PM
5

This video cuts off before the best part, when she and Warren Farrell hug :) Call me a softy...
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:14 AM
3

John the Other is badass.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:13 AM
8

Don't forget the lawyers who profit off broken families. Those people are real sweethearts.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:36 AM
7

"goes against nature" She may want to read an introductory anthropology textbook.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:33 AM
1

I disagree, depending on our definition of MGTOW. History shows that it IS possible to change the law even in the face of overwhelming opposition. It just requires grit. Even if one concludes that both men and women are naturally gynocentric, it is STILL in the best interests of women to support equal rights, so that argument doesn't really fly either. And I'm not just talking about mothers with sons. I'm saying that women are currently being treated like spoiled children, and that that doesn't …
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:28 AM
2

So close yet so far.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:43 AM
4

Well that's good to hear. Sincerely.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:39 AM
10

There is very little a single mother can do to offset the absence of a father. Men are crucial to child-rearing. All the studies prove it. Sucks for lesbians but that's life. Best interests of the child and all that.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:05 AM
18

I'm pretty sure recent studies have shown that shared parenting even helps the mother. So NOW's position is harmful to all parties: the father, the mother, and especially the children. Their stance seems to be rooted in nothing more than a desire to harm fathers. Mothers and children and the health of society as a whole are collateral damage in the feminist crusade.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:03 AM
1

I believe AVoiceForMen reviewed it at some point.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:58 AM
9

Men used to be afforded respect and honor for sacrificing on behalf of women. Now? They are demonized simply for existing while still being expected to fulfill their role as disposable workhorse. The logical thing to do is to take women at their word when they say they "don't need no man." However men are not logical when it comes to women. Feminists have ruthlessly and despicably exploited the male protective instinct to create an anti-male society.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:46 PM
2

That doc is pure poison.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:30 PM
5

Well, there is a well studied psychological phenomenon called in-group bias. Women have it, men don't. That means both sexes tend to be more empathetic towards females (probably an evolutionary adaptation that is now maladaptive). It also means patriarchy theory is horseshit. Take a look at that video with Sharon Osbourne. The entire audience of women breaks out in raucous applause when Osbourne celebrates a woman who castrated her husband (because he cheated on her). I just can't imagine a gend…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:28 PM
4

Agreed. I've seen her interviewed numerous times and she seems quite intelligent, well spoken, quick on her feet. It's true that she went a little easy on the feminists, but look how savagely she's being treated by the feminist community simply for presenting MRA issues in a fair light.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:23 PM
3

Not vesectomies in particular but male birth control: "Whilst the latest developments may be new, the general concept is not. In the 1970s, Brazilian endocrinologist Dr Elsimar Coutinho developed one of the first ever male pill prototypes. Made from all-natural cottonseed, it didn’t go down too well with pharmaceutical companies for obvious reasons (hardly a money-spinner if the local health shop can produce a no-frills version for half the price), but it also suffered social resistance. When la…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:48 PM
–

Obviously this "Wonder Woman" silliness was dreamt up by the studios and advertisers.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:19 AM
–

Incredibly lame that the mods are posting this silliness; it's an obvious PR stunt using men as foils. Let's lend more credibility to the film "Snuff" -- another ridiculous film made by amateurs that was protested by feminists -- rather than MRA's.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:17 AM
-11

Uh-huh. Stop falling for obvious publicity stunt nonsense.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:03 AM
1

An example of that is the very early review of Cassie Jaye's The Red Pill. It was a low-quality review, which isn't a crime. But it was stupidly biased to pander to the site's feminist-leaning readership. Wow. I can't believe you're admitting this. Kudos. It's honestly refreshing to see someone admit when "their side" has done something...shall we say...unethical. <Ghostbusters. Honestly I think the whole "controversy" was extremely silly. And yes that applies to some of the KIA people who took …
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:20 AM
25

Christ, as if boys don't have enough to worry about. They're falling way behind in school, they are being drugged on Ritalin, they are being taught that their sex is "toxic", and you want to heap further abuse on them? This is what happens when you have tens (hundreds?) of thousands of idiots whose "job" is to search for sexism against females. Feminism is now an industry, not an "equality" movement. And that's assuming this stat is even accurate. Something tells me that like most feminist "stud…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 03:22 AM
1

It was really educational, people got fascinated by the subject of film finance and returns so we all learned a lot about how that worked. lol true enough. The theatre has zero connection with the huge WB ecosystem and the tens or hundreds of thousands who earn their living from it. Perhaps. I'm a little more skeptical of these sorts of stunts. The quality of the unseen film instantly plummets, reviews are produced explaining in detail how everything about it is bad, not just the gender politics…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 02:44 AM
10

Call me skeptical but I can't help but wonder how many of these catcalling stories are made up. "I'm so attractive that guys can't control themselves around me! Those beasts!'"
/r/MensRights28/05/17 01:40 AM
16

It's bad and getting worse every day. In Australia they are teaching pre-pubescent boys about "toxic masculinity" and "male privilege." You're right my statement was a tad alarmist, let's just say the trends are rather worrisome. It's worth stressing that feminists have only recently attained great institutional power. They have been influential in the past but they are now in the driver's seat. New legislation in Canada is requiring that judges be indoctrinated with feminist theory: https://www…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 12:59 AM
6

Stop posting these stupid Wonder Woman stories. It's a lame publicity stunt. Don't take the bait.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 12:19 AM
20

She wrote that 16 years ago and things have gotten exponentially worse. I can't imagine growing up as a young boy these days. If had a boy I would seriously consider moving to a non-Western country. I consider myself lucky that I was born in the 70's before the radfems took over.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 11:14 PM
5

On the contrary, it has become virtually impossible to distinguish between a typical feminist rant and satire.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 10:54 PM
8

Charming title given that we are in the middle of a male suicide epidemic. Not only do I enjoy male nudity and male objectification because I derive physical pleasure from it, but I also like the revenge element. I like that when we idealize beautiful men, that it hurts ugly men. Ladies and gentlemen: the "more empathetic" sex.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 10:52 PM
4

Being that it's 4chan I very much doubt that.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 10:29 PM
13

Stand by your man...
/r/MensRights27/05/17 10:26 PM
1

We aren't being attacked by a sovereign government - we're being attacked by terrorists. Terrorism can and frequently is committed by "sovereign governments." For example in Iraq the United States used the "Salvador Option" -- death squads and torture against civilians. States have also been known to use "false flag operations". The most notorious example of this was Operation Gladio, whereby NATO intelligence and the CIA set up fascist cells throughout Western Europe to commit terrorist atrocit…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 10:21 PM
1

My argument is quite simple: we aren't collectively responsible, we are individuals. I agree. But that's not the way wars work. If a government attacks another country then all sorts of innocent people are going to die. That, in turn, is going to cause a desire for revenge. This should be painfully obvious. So again, if you're interested in stopping terrorism you should demand that your government stop participating in it. The same is true of the Muslim community. Your 'rant' would have the worl…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:32 PM
1

Western forces deliberately targeted hydro-electric dams and water purification facilities during the first Iraq war. This was after a report warning that this would cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children -- which it did. Don't pretend governments have the moral high ground. They're just as bad if not worse than your average maniacal terrorist.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:25 PM
1

How bout blowing up wedding parties, underage kids walking down the street etc. Infinitely more civilians have been killed in Western wars in countries like Iraq than terrorist attacks in the West. Both are horrific, and violence begets violence.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:22 PM
1

How many Muslims do I get to blow up? You seem to be making some sort of moral argument. I'm making a simple observation that should be obvious to any six year old. If you live in a country whose government is attacking the people of another country, you shouldn't be surprised if some of those people decide to fight back -- using whatever means are available to them. The CIA even has a term for it -- "blowback." Westerners seem to think war is something that happens on television. The rest of yo…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:20 PM
11

Um, Trump is not an MRA.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:16 AM
0

Millions of Muslims have been killed in Western wars of aggression since 9/11. It is pants-on-head retarded to think that you can cause that sort of genocidal violence and expert nothing in return. Terribly un-pc thing to say, but there it is. The best way of stopping terrorism is to stop engaging in it.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:07 AM
13

I'm having a difficult time understanding why anyone cares what this vacuous young woman thinks.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:29 AM
36

Savage rebuttal. Richly deserved.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:24 AM
3

Yes. It's a transparent and lame marketing ploy.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:11 AM
3

From what I've read most MRA's considered and consider the Ghostbusters remake a lame, poorly written, poorly directed and poorly acted take on a classic that attempted to cash in on gullible feminists easily parted with their money. The Mad Max thing was more sinister, since dozens of feminist columnists lied by claiming that MRA's were "organizing a boycott" of the film (I quite enjoyed it, actually) after some guy wrote a blog on a far right wing news site. That was presumably a reprehensible…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:58 AM
2

I like Peterson even if I don't agree with his economic politics. I applaud his bravery in standing up to the PC mob. I also find some of his ideas quite original, such as his contention that compassion is a double edged sword: it is an essential quality for the mother bear in raising her young, but a negative quality for the poor sap who wanders into her hunting ground. He has even spoken of an emerging "female totalitarianism", perhaps unique in history. However I've long been skeptical of pur…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:01 AM
14

I applaud your bravery. I will not be surprised if every girl hates me when I come back next year, just because I stood up and told the truth. I very much doubt that will be the case. If it is, it shows just how far we've deteriorated as a society. Urge your detractors to watch The Red Pill, made by a (former) feminist and woman, and stress that you support equal rights. They followed me out the door and all the way to the bus stop, harassing and attacking me the entire way. They are cowards. Th…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:53 AM
4

In my country at least t What country? And we are still talking about feminists instead of focusing on our problems, as fucking usual. Are you dense? I just posted you a link showing a dozen examples of feminists changing the law to harm men. One cannot support equal rights without opposing feminism.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:01 AM
30

If those samples were found in the post by officials on their way to foreign laboratories, the French men who sent them could theoretically face a year in prison and a 15,000 Euro fine. This year the ban was challenged but the French Government decided to uphold and maintain the anti-paternity testing law. The reasons for which the Government said the ban should remain were related to the preservation of peace within French families. According to some online articles, Germany, has also banned (o…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:53 PM
3

Obviously they have their extremists that are straight up retarded, but the thing as a whole isn't bad. Check out this short piece by Karen Straughan. I would be interested in hearing if you change your opinion after reading it. The extremists are guiding the ship. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:39 PM
3

That's the thing I don't get with "Men'sRights" movements, aren't we supposed to fight against mandatory military registration instead of bashing the feminists for not wanting it? That's the position of most MRA's. Abolish conscription. The only reason we bring it up vis a vis feminism is that feminists claim they are a "gender equality" movement, which obviously isn't the case.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:20 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06Ja7dj22sE
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:21 PM
18

Great. Too bad you're irrelevant. If feminists spent 1/1 hundredth of the time trying to reform their movement from within rather than defending their brand name on the Internet we wouldn't even need a Men's Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:16 PM
8

I strongly disagree. The people I'm talking about are not marginal figures; they are the movers and shakers of the feminist movement. Today and yesterday. The academics, the leaders, the big organizations like the National Organization for Women. The people who write policy that is passed into law. The "coffee shop" feminists who have some vague idea about gender equality do nothing but enable the man-haters at the top. Here's a great little piece by Karen Straughan on the subject, highly recomm…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:09 PM
1

Wow. That's really telling. It's also telling that a feminist professor in Canada wrote an entire book trying to justify wives killing their husbands using the discredited Duluth model. And apparently her opinions are taken seriously by the legal community. I believe John the Other did a video on this.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:57 PM
6

Both exist in parts this community Perhaps. But MRA's don't have any institutional power (ironic for an alleged "patriarchy", no?). We are not seeking male supremacy, while feminists are doing exactly that (and have already succeeded to an alarming degree). Moreover, MRA's do not portray females as an "oppressor class". Feminist theory is itself rooted in misandry, whereas MRA's only want equal rights and responsibilities. I'll concede that there is a lot of misogyny in the MGTOW forums, and som…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:51 PM
5

A transparent marketing ploy using men as the foils. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:46 PM
3

don't mistake that for some admission that there isn't an unfortunate amount of anti-feminism and misogyny Anti-feminism is not misogyny. The vast majority of women don't identify as feminists -- I think in the UK it's down to 7 percent? Most people support gender equality, which is precisely why they don't support the feminist movement. Feminist leaders work tirelessly to preserve and expand female privilege while demonizing men and boys. They oppose equal parenting rights; they want to elimina…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:26 PM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 12:15 AM
16

Feminism has always been about maximum choice (with minimal responsibility) for women. The only new thing here is that a growing number of women have finally figured out that most jobs suck ass and raising a family is more fulfilling. Studies show that house wives have the highest happiness rate of any female demographic. The question is how many men are going to want to subsidize house wives given the monumental risks involved.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 09:18 PM
4

You're not the first one to notice this. Feminists do more to propagate negative stereotypes about women than any other group.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 09:06 PM
20

This is called "preparing boys for the real world", as opposed to the imaginary world dreamt up by feminists. There's a reason children fare much better when they have contact with their fathers. The role of the mother is unconditional love and support. The role of the father is to instill a sense of justice and character and prepare the child for the horrors of reality.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:45 PM
1

We're talking about a specific culture, are we not? If you want to compare how men and women fare in Saudi Arabia or China or Eastern Europe then we can discuss that too. For example we could compare male slaves being used for their labor vs. female slaves being used for sex, or the higher rates of boys who are subject to molestation in countries like Afghanistan. Seems like you're the one being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:39 PM
4

This phenomenon is discussed at length in the book "Sexual Utopia in Power" which is popular on Pick up Artist websites. The basic gist is that men thought the "sexual liberation" movement would mean more sex for men. Turns out the opposite happened. Most women ended up only pursuing what they considered the "top" men (high status, rich, handsome), so the average dude was left out in the cold. They argue therefore that sexual "liberation" for women was sexual enslavement (from the male POV, lack…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:34 PM
83

Sounds like a publicity stunt. They did the same with Ghostbusters and Mad Max. "MRA's organize boycott of sassy feminist film!" Actually no, it was some anti-MRA dude who wrote a single article on some right wing website.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:26 PM
6

Women have more rights then men and are privileged from cradle to grave. Human rights violations like genital mutilation and being denied access to one's children are not in the same universe, let alone ballpark, as trivialities like "manspreding" and "mansplaining."
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:24 PM
13

lol at poster who thinks "meninism" is a real thing. The authors are academics not pranksters. It's a rather boring read Reviewer doesn't claim this. Indeed she states that she found much of the book interesting. Her complaint is with the writing style. Frankly she seems to be grasping at straws in order to negatively review an anti-feminist work. Rather than concentrating on the practice and consequences of male-bashing (and perhaps, heaven help us, even suggesting some solutions) Note for read…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:20 PM
16

Feminists threw away the male gender role while demanding that the traditional female gender role be kept in tact. Women are now privileged in both spheres -- the home and the workplace. They can receive scholarships and affirmative action to achieve a job, then if they want to they can ditch their careers and become stay at home moms. Men are left without a sense of purpose. Feminists won't even allow them to be fathers; instead they demonize fathers for being "deadbeats" or domestic abusers an…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:11 PM
6

It becomes less cute when you realize that almost every major feminist activist has expressed similar sentiments -- unironically. First wave feminists typically did so in private. For example Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote in her diary that "we are, as a sex, infinitely superior" to men. During the second wave feminists openly expressed supremacist beliefs. For example Germaine Greer stated, “I have a great deal of difficulty with the idea of the ideal man. As far as I’m concerned, men are the pro…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:58 PM
9

Women have been criminally under-represented in serial killer documentaries, literature, films etc. Even by law enforcement agencies including the FBI. A female criminologist whose name I forget recently wrote an article about this. She said that female serial killers have historically been much more common than most people realize; their crimes just tend to be less viscerally "thrilling." People want to see a movie about some damsel being stalked and stabbed by a brazen male sex-crazed psychopa…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:11 AM
5

How bout this wonderful human being.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 03:15 AM
8

she preceded to rip on men for not allowing women to go battle. lol. Yeah because I'm sure the women were lining up to go die in rat infested trenches. I mean, there may have been a few, but to argue that being forced to die in wars is a privilege is the height of feminist dishonesty and stupidity. The majority of American men who fought in the war were conscripted, they didn't enlist. Some men were sent to prison and/or shot for refusing to fight, even conscientious objectors (like the Hofer br…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:37 AM
5

I strongly disagree. Society does not treat sexual assault in a "gender neutral" matter. Boys need to be taught the hard reality, not the mythology. Otherwise they will end up victims. The same is true about things like "talking about your feelings." If you're a parent then of course you should encourage your children to talk to you about their problems. But boys need to be made cognizant that society will not extend the same empathy to their sex as females. There is a difference between teachin…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:07 AM
3

Maybe start an MRM group? I'd like to see one in every major city and town in the next decade. The more women that become involved the more powerful we will be -- and, paradoxically, the more empowered women will be. Join the honey badgers? They're a great group of gals (and a few guys) fighting for men's rights. I'm sure they'd be happy to have you on and advise you.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 12:20 AM
2

And here's Janice Fiamengo on the empathy gap. Cites numerous examples. Edit: oops forgot link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKJ8x9ut1hU
/r/MensRights24/05/17 11:54 PM
2

in/out group bias is related. Study linked here. https://www.avoiceformen.com/gynarchy/the-in-group-bias-mistake-and-darwinian-gender-studies/ Also related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights24/05/17 11:51 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4t4vgm/study_finds_that_as_many_as_88_of_people_would/ Not that we should need studies to demonstrate the obvious.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 11:19 PM
5

“We sought to demonstrate that a desire for a certain moral view of the world to be validated could overcome the critical assessment required for legitimate scholarship,” they wrote. “Particularly, we suspected that gender studies is crippled academically by an overriding almost-religious belief that maleness is the root of all evil. On the evidence, our suspicion was justified.” And there you have it. To what extent are gender studies programs funded by governments? They should be immediately d…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:26 PM
2

Aren't men also a minority compared to women?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:33 PM
1

Unless I'm mistaken China is the only country in the world where the female suicide rate is higher than that of males. Pretty sure they also rank near the top for female engineers. Be careful what you wish for ladies.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:23 PM
9

Not to become a feminist.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:39 PM
12

Run away! Run away!
/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:52 PM
10

I've never dated a feminist, but in the past before I learned about the ideology I wouldn't have had a problem doing so. Now? No fucking way. Anyone who believes in cockamamie ideas like "affirmative consent" is a false rape accusation waiting to happen. I tend to broach the issue in a roundabout way by discussing politics. If they believe in "the patriarchy" then it's bye bye.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:11 PM
25

Nice write up but I strongly disagree with this: The CEO of Ms. Magazine seemed smart and level headed, despite being a huge critic. Her focus is obviously on women, and that's fine. To me she came off worse than anyone in the film, even big red. She was arrogant, out of touch, elitist, condescending, smug and ignorant. Focussing on women's issues doesn't mean you get to lie about domestic violence and portray men as abusive monsters. Her line about "their grandfathers had it pretty good" becaus…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:22 PM
9

Aren't mothers the most likely to abuse their children? Followed by non-biological fathers? The headline has it exactly backwards: the current arrangements are endangering children. Equal parenting rights would help everyone concerned. Feminists are essentially using children as human shields and perpetuating their abuse for no other reason than they want to harm fathers. Another factor is that abused children sometimes grow up to become abusive themselves -- including against women. So literall…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:11 PM
9

I started reading the comments then stopped. They're predictable: a bunch of women saying "wha wha cry me a river, at least you don't have to worry about being raped and killed, plus patriarchy!" In the first place, yes, we do have to worry about being raped and killed. And secondly, why is that women have become so addicted to victimhood that they are unable to even acknowledge men's issues without narcissistically making everything about themselves? Where is this much heralded female empathy I…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:25 PM
6

Super rich men are often treated leniently when accused of a crime. In other words men have to become super rich to be treated like average women in the criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:08 AM
16

Not sure why this would surprise anyone. Republicans have never been pro-men. All Western political parties are gynocentric to the core. So much for the "patriarchy" lol.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:05 AM
7

One criticism: I object to labeling feminists as "WRA's." Most MRA's are also WRA's. Most feminists are NOT MRA's. MRA's support equal rights, feminists support female supremacy. Hence their opposition to things like equal parenting rights.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:17 PM
1

So it will more be about Trump's boorish comments than misandry? Seems like there is already more than enough attention being paid to Trump's shenanigans.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 08:22 PM
1

What's up with the Trump stuff? Seems like it will confuse people as to what the topic is...
/r/MensRights21/05/17 08:09 PM
3

You are a misogynist.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:07 PM
3

Studies claim I am a dragon (I was born in the year OF the dragon, according to the Chinese calendar). I insist you believe it and refer to me by my proper pronoun, which is Sir, or better yet, Sir Dragon.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 09:00 PM
1

racially profiling and singling out people Is Abhorrent, but not the same thing as drawing up lists, kidnapping people, then torturing and killing them as occurred in eg Pinochet's pro-capitalist Chile. He was directly advised by Milton Friedman. I can't really provide more evidence of Hitler not being a capitalist You are an army of one, plus a few fruitcakes. Every single reputable historian who has studied Nazi Germany concedes that it was pro-capitalist. And not to put too fine a point on it…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:29 PM
2

progressives are far closer to fascism than either left or right Perhaps. Again it depends on how we define the term. Modern day "progressives" aren't rounding people up and putting them in camps, as occurred in countless communist and pro-capitalist dictatorships throughout the 20th century. To call him a capitalist is evidently inaccurate I disagree. The essential components of a capitalist economy were present in Nazi Germany, and as mentioned he was funded by the great capitalists of the age…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:55 PM
24

If what you say is correct, then millions of dollars are currently being wasted teaching young people a wrong-headed ideology. Is that possible!?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:22 PM
70

American black women are treated better in the criminal "justice" system than white men. If feminist "intersectionality" theory were correct, the exact opposite would be true. Oops. ;)
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:19 PM
2

I believe it has far more in common with the left than the right This is completely ahistorical. Hitler was fanatically pro-capitalist, anti-union and was in fact funded by the great capitalists of the age, from DuPont to Rockefeller to Ford. Just like feminism in fact. Fascism is the last resort of capitalism. Winston Churchill (certainly no "progressive") was a huge fan of Mussolini until the fascists began encroaching on Anglo-American interests. Depending on how we define "progressivism" I m…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:50 PM
17

Nailed it. Men don't "seek help" because men aren't idiots. We know that no one gives a shit about us and that we are expected to shoulder the burdens of others (specifically women and children). Now, if these people truly want to curb the male suicide epidemic they will take a good hard look at how our society is treating men. They will look at the laws that oppress men. That is the road to change, not lame pleas for men to become more like women and talk about their feeeeelings.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:43 PM
8

I think it's more complicated. White men are their rhetorical targets, but feminist policy harms poor men the most, and poverty doesn't discriminate. Just to offer an example: there was a recent case of a black man who lost his job and couldn't find work. He fell behind in child support. He had a previous arrest, so when the police arrived he ran. They shot him in the back, killing him. I'm not saying white men don't face discrimination. They do -- mostly due to their sex but increasingly due to…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:38 PM
6

I just mentioned one such strike. Things went swimmingly ;) Police evolved from slave patrols and strike breakers. They do more harm than good.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:32 PM
180

Why is it that we can't restore normalcy? Female "weakness" is their primary source of strength. That's the paradox. That's why Munchausen syndrome exists. Damsel in distress? Men come running. Nature gave men a slew of advantages, but it richly compensated women. Unfortunately we don't recognize female power, which is dangerous because power corrupts. Men in power favor women. Women also favor women. Studies on in group bias confirm this. That means that "patriarchy" theory is, in a word, horse…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:29 PM
17

http://mra-uk.co.uk/?p=215 http://mra-uk.co.uk/?p=414
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:23 PM
21

See also: "Judges ordered to show more mercy on women criminals when deciding sentences" http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311004/Judges-ordered-mercy-women-criminals-deciding-sentences.html
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:13 PM
14

Nanny state on steroids. I agree with Jordan Peterson that this will harm rather than help trans people. State mandated speech is never a good idea. And what's the purpose of this? Virtue signaling, essentially.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:08 PM
4

Police are overrated. During the Seattle General Strike the police force was abolished. Veterans from WWI took over. Crime plummeted and arrests dropped by half.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:03 PM
3

Second wave feminists were funded by the Ford and Rockefeller foundations. Gloria Steinem was funded by the CIA, as she herself eventually admitted. Friedan was a useful idiot.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:58 PM
191

Reminder that a study showed that five out of six UK male prisoners would be free if they were treated like women in the criminal "justice" system. I suspect the situation is similar in the US. If we truly want to lessen unnecessary incarceration we are better off looking at sex than race.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:56 PM
15

Once a week isn't enough. The gender sentencing gap is six times larger than the racial sentencing gap. And feminists want to make it worse. "Equality" lol.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:53 PM
16

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/plea-keep-women-out-prison-12511713#ICID=FB-Chron-main
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:52 PM
2

John Stuart Mill Mill was a socialist and advocated for the elimination of wage labor.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:45 PM
1

Feminism was designed to replace class struggle. Hence why it is funded by the great capitalists. You're hilariously confused.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:42 PM
1

That's an unrelated but interesting point.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:40 AM
4

Great article Peter. A common claim by feminists is that "nice guys" are only interested in sex. This is patently false. Nice guys are the biggest romantics around, while studs tend to be much more detached about relationships. This isn't to say that sex isn't important to men, obviously it is. But it's also about basic human contact. Unless I'm mistaken there is actually a program in some European country (Germany?) that provides occasional prostitutes for disabled men. That seems like a very h…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:03 AM
3

My position is already the law in most Western nations. Just do a Google search for juvenile punishments in X nation.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 02:09 AM
9

One of the problems with sexual assault and sexual harassment allegations is that human relationships are messy. Men are expected to initiate, and that includes men who are socially awkward, have mental illnesses, or are just plain unattractive. Thus, a behavior conducted by a wealthy handsome individual could meet the requirements for sexual harassment or even assault but be welcomed by a woman, and conversely, a harmless but clumsy come-on by an unattractive individual could be construed as hi…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:43 AM
3

lol. I explicitly stated that it should not be the same. That was my entire point. My opinion is supported by every single human rights organization in the world. You opinion is supported by religious fundamentalists and dictators.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:19 AM
5

Are you suggesting they should have their own prison called Time Out Land You may have heard of something called "juvenile detention facilities." Or did you think we incarcerated children and teenagers with adults? At this point you may want to do some rudimentary research on the ways in which civilized countries already treat young offenders very differently than adults.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:55 AM
7

An extremely damning experiment. We assumed that if we were merely clear in our moral implications that maleness is intrinsically bad and that the penis is somehow at the root of it, we could get the paper published in a respectable journal. We didn’t try to make the paper coherent Unfortunately that may have helped the paper get published. Feminism is nothing if not incoherent. Destructive, unsustainable hegemonically male approaches to pressing environmental policy and action are the predictab…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:52 AM
5

they are simply punished differently. They aren't "punished". They are treated. Stop coddling them simply because they are young. Are you honestly arguing that a young person who murders someone should NOT go to prison? I never said that. I simply said they shouldn't be treated like adults because they aren't adults.. Their brains aren't fully developed.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:34 AM
8

subtle messages in the buildings themselves lol I missed that one. These people are starting to sound like paranoid schizophrenics. The patriarchy! It's everywhere! Even in the walls and the air we breathe!
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:16 AM
2

But the problem was the fact that she was drunk so she legally could not consent to the sexual activity. Isn't the same true of Brock then? I don't understand why only one party is held accountable for actions they undertake while drunk -- well I do, but you get the point. Incidentally, didn't Lena Dunham (or was it Amy Schumer? I get the two mixed up) write about doing the exact same thing to a man -- when she was sober?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:08 AM
3

The subject of debate is a 14 year old and your first statistic is about 13 and younger individuals. So you're okay with 14 year olds being tried as adults but not 13 year olds? Your second statistical point is applying to one in five if not less of people who are 14 years old. So would you be okay with one in five schizophrenics being treated as sane? The bottom line is that your position is an irrational one. 14 year olds are not adults, their brains aren't fully developed. You are supporting …
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:04 AM
15

When women are treated like men (equally) they perceive it as "sexist" because they are accustomed to chivalry. Studies confirm this (interestingly, men also perceive equality toward women as "sexist"). The kicker is that feminists also perceive chivalrous behavior as "sexist" (feminists even have a phrase for it, "benevolent sexism"). So there is literally no way of interacting with women that feminists will not perceive as sexist (or "misogynist"). The only solution is to ignore their demands …
/r/MensRights19/05/17 11:14 PM
1

I got banned for presenting logical arguments to a feminist. I was entirely polite during the whole affair. Feminists cannot handle debate because their theories are irrational and contradictory.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 11:09 PM
1

Can someone explain the Brock Turner case? As I understand they were both drunk and she willingly hooked up with him. Is that not accurate?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 11:03 PM
5

I note with interest that this post is being heavily downvoted, presumably by conservatives. People need to remember that gynocentrism is not just a problem on the left, and we do ourselves no favors by pretending as though right wing politicians are working on behalf of men's rights. They aren't. The right has in fact worked with feminists on a whole range of issues, from no fault divorce to preventing alimony reform to opposing shared parenting to increasing penalties for prostitution to oppos…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 10:09 PM
7

If you commit the crimes of an adult then you should be judged as one. This is nonsensical and barbaric. It is noteworthy that only a few countries in the world hold this stance -- the United States and a bunch of backward theocracies. "It has been found that youths younger than 13 are lacking many of the abilities that older adolescent and adult defendants possess; namely a familiarity with court proceedings, a robust understanding of rights, a comprehension that defense attorneys are on the si…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 09:40 PM
1

There was some study (sorry, no link) showing that "diversity training" and "unconscious racism" training in businesses actually increased racist attitudes. I suspect that "misogyny" and "affirmative consent" classes produce a similar effect. People don't like being lectured at. If you really want to blow the minds of the SJW's you should focus on class. Identity politics increases division amongst the working class and is a betrayal of the ideas of people like Martin Luther King (a democratic s…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:46 AM
11

Studies show that that these sites reduce heroin usage and prevent the spread of STD's. The "war on liquor", the "war on drugs", the "war on prostitution", the "war on terrorism" etc. only increase the problems they purport to be solving.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:26 AM
25

Women are just as violent as men. They are just more cowardly in the way they perpetrate violence. For example they are more likely to use proxy violence via the state and to target children and the elderly.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 01:26 AM
4

You're a legend.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 01:24 AM
3

I don't think we'll ever do away with gynocentrism entirely. It's simply the way we're hardwired. But just because something is difficult doesn't mean it's unachievable. Sadly, it may be that the MRM will only succeed when enough women realize it is in their best interest. And it is: consider that studies on shared parenting show it is actually beneficial to the mother as well as father and children. At the end of the day you can't harm men without harming women. They rely on us to an extraordin…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 11:42 PM
6

It certainly helps to explain a great many patriarchal institutions. Perhaps patriarchy was rooted in love and the desire to protect women rather than oppress them? That would make a lot more sense than the "men are evil and tried to oppress their own mothers throughout all of history" narrative propagated by feminists.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 11:28 PM
11

Tangentially related to men's rights. I saw a post on r/thebluepill expressing astonishment at how fast the MGTOW sub is growing. Here's a link confirming the trend. Feminists hate the idea of gender equality so they spend most of their time attacking the Men's Rights Movement. They really should start thinking this thing through. MRA's are pretty benign figures when you get down to it. Stopping the genital mutilation of children, granting fathers equal rights, supporting male victims of domesti…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 11:00 PM
10

The irony is that in the modern West the exact opposite is true. Females are privileged in every sphere while males suffer institutional discrimination in school, universities, the workplace, family courts, criminal courts, health, social services and the broader culture (see Paul Nathanson's work on misandry). Feminists have it exactly backwards.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 08:18 PM
2

At what point do we start calling this a matriarchy? I mean that in all seriousness. Every single political party is pro-feminist even if they avoid the label. Women have more rights than men. Thousands of programs for women and girls. Virtually nothing for men and boys. Constant vilification of men and masculinity. It makes no difference how many politicians or CEO's have penises if they are supporting policies that oppress men.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 08:14 PM
7

Because men – and especially white, professional men – occupy a uniquely privileged place in society, Nathan is reluctant to discuss his feelings openly. Lol. Stopped reading there.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:57 PM
8

Stipulate that those who confess won't be punished. Problem solved. Remember that we're only talking about cases where it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the accuser engaged in a malicious lie. Not a "he said she said" situation.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:49 PM
2

"Patriarchy" lol. Great post.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:36 PM
2

She definitely should do a follow up of some sort. One intriguing idea posed by (I forget) would be to show how feminism harms women and children in addition to men. I would also love to see a documentary on the Honey Badgers, or just Karen Straughan (focussing on their ideas, not their personal lives).
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:31 PM
6

Feminists gave feathers to boys as young as 12. Some went on to fight and die in the war before they even saw their 16th birthday. 40 percent of adult British males lacked the property requirements to vote. And yet we celebrate the suffragettes. Hideous.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 02:41 AM
5

The studies took into account severity of crime, previous offenses and all other controlling factors. If men were treated like women in the criminal justice system then 5 out of 6 male prisoners would be free (in the UK; not sure about the US). It is clear that (a) you haven't the slightest idea what you're talking about. You haven't even bothered to study the history of the movement you so fervently support and (b) you're an ideologue who can't be swayed by facts. Instead of thanking me for kin…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 02:38 AM
11

There is no such thing as "the patriarchy". It's a figment of your imagination, like the "illuminati" to Alex Jones. female on male domestic violence not taken seriously The first domestic violence law in the United States was gender neutral. The Massachusetts Bay Colony passed an edict in 1655 that stated: "No man shall strike his wife nor any woman her husband on penalty of such fine not exceeding ten pounds for one offense, or such corporal punishment as the County shall determine." Feminists…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 02:07 AM
7

It's kinda sad to realise how little feminism has changed in that time. If you wanna get really depressed go read Earnest Belford Bax's "The Fraud of Feminism." He was making the same arguments we do a century ago. The good news is that feminism has become such a menace that men (and quite a few women) are finally saying enough.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:53 AM
39

I agree. However it's remarkable how little difference there is between Tumblrinas and academic feminists. The latter group simply uses fancier language.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:48 AM
1

MRA's are the equivalent of WRA's. Red Pillers are the equivalent of women who read Cosmo magazine. Radical MGTOW's are the equivalent of feminists. They really do despise the opposite sex. Not to be confused with the majority of MGTOW's, who are simply men who recognize a raw deal when they see it.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:45 AM
1

Nice.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 11:50 PM
1

Does it really matter if feminists blame the patriarchy while MRAs blame gynocentrism if there are shared goals of equality under the law and equal treatment in courts? Well, as mentioned I would be happy to see feminists organizing to change the laws in an actual gender neutral way regardless of whether they believe in the patriarchy. But it does matter to the extent that if you start out with a faulty premise you are going to make constant errors. So if you assume that feminists are acting in …
/r/MensRights17/05/17 11:40 PM
9

It's not entirely outside the realm of possibility that something like this could work, at least on a few issues. Every day we see feminists posting on this sub claiming they want to end conscription and MGM; that they oppose the Duluth model; that they support shared parenting etc. It might be a worthwhile effort to create a sub for all these "dissident feminists" to organize against the people who run their movement. Let them put their money where their mouth is. Hell, let them blame everythin…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 10:49 PM
3

And "should we celebrate"? More charming comments from our favorite equality hate movement. I can't help but wonder how many feminists honestly believe they don't need men. Women would last about a week in our absence. It would be the shortest lived dystopia in history.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 09:28 PM
8

Anarcha-feminists are frauds. If they were actually anarchists they would want nothing to do with feminism, an authoritarian ideology that relies on the state to steal men's wealth and turns dads into indentured servants. They would be aghast at attempts to reverse due process rights, to allow the state to micro-manage people's sex lives, to make cat-calling a "hate crime" etc. Come to think of it Marxist feminists are frauds too, since feminists do not want "equality of outcome" when it comes t…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 09:13 PM
3

Jennifer McIntosh is a Victorian psychologist who was the lead author in a hugely influential study which concluded that any regular overnight care by fathers was damaging to infants and toddlers. McIntosh promoted this position across the world – men’s groups in Israel threatened to sue her after she campaigned in their country against shared parenting. Feminists are so fucking evil. Then came the game-changer. In 2014 Richard Warshak, a psychiatry professor who’s also an international authorit…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 07:10 PM
19

every other polarised member of the plebeian political spectrum The word "plebeian" makes no sense in this context. r/Iamverysmart the film’s director, Cassie Jaye, is certainly no Tarantino either. Evidently the reviewer isn't aware of a single documentary filmmaker she could have compared to Cassie. Plebeian indeed. the benefits of feminism and how it addresses many of the men’s rights issues brought up by the film Facepalm. A pressing need for gender discourse to stray away from descending in…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:53 PM
29

What is this a restaurant? Tell them you won't be eating there anymore and tell them why.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:33 PM
2

Huh? Very few liberals have spoken out in favor of men's rights. They almost universally support feminism. Sadly the same is true of most socialists and anarchists. Though it's also true that the first major critiques of feminism ("The Fraud of Feminism" and "The Legal Subjugation of Men") were written by a socialist (Earnest Belford Bax, in the early 20th century). After the 70's feminism became the left's version of religion. Feminism is a set of irrational, counter-factual, provably false, an…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 07:01 PM
2

But instead of saying, "men also face systemic oppression," you say, "only men face systemic oppression. Women faced "systemic oppression" in the 19th century, and today in some countries like Saudi Arabia. In the West, it is only males that face "systemic" oppression (edit: due to their sex). Unless you think manspreading and mansplaining qualify. Women are now privileged in both the traditional male and female spheres. Straight white men may indeed be oppressed based on their sex, but that doe…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 04:50 PM
2

And your mistake is assuming that I'm referring to "every single man" and not men as a general demographic. Go ahead and read the stats I linked if you want to get a handle on how men as a "general demographic" are faring. You seemed to be implying that "cishet straight white males" suffer no "systemic oppression" due to their sex. I pointed out that they do. The criminal and family courts are the very definition of systemic. I am a man That doesn't surprise me. As I pointed out, males have bias…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 04:13 PM
2

Men, as a group, have more power, especially in the highest echelons of society. Your mistake is in viewing men as a borg hive collective. That's not the way men work. Men do not try to "privilege" their sexual competitors and actually have out-group bias toward women. That's why there are thousands of programs for women and girls and very few for men and boys. It's also why JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs fund feminist programs while the first International Men's Conference was held in an old build…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:53 PM
4

Essential viewing. Every feminist should see this. If they have even the slightest hint of basic human decency they will ditch feminism and begin supporting equal rights.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 12:28 AM
6

Here. Read some quotes by the leaders of your movement, past and present. From the founder of the feminist movement in the US, who argued that women are "infinitely superior to men," to the founder of the first gender studies course, who literally advocated genocide against men and boys. Also includes a quote by Germaine Greer claiming that males are "inferior" to females on a biological level. These are feminism's leading lights, not marginal figures. There is nothing remotely equivalent by MRA…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 12:22 AM
14

in a culture where women are treated like cattle Seven different Islamic nations have elected women to head of state. Pretty sure they don't do that with cows. If you're talking about a country like Saudi Arabia, it's true that women lack certain rights. But any analysis of gender in Islamic nations has to also take in to account the disadvantages of the males -- which are numerous (and by "males" I don't mean the Saudi Royal Family). Cows also don't get to have male servants and order men kille…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 10:44 PM
7

Great to hear. What a scam artist. Still, we may be winning on the Internet but we're not winning in academia or government. The fight has only just begun.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 09:37 PM
5

After all the hullabaloo I was was expecting something dramatic from Laci. Instead all I saw was, "I've had conversations with a few anti-SJW's and they made a few good points" and "I support free speech unless it calls for violence." Her example was a feminist woman who was critical of current thinking on trans issues. Red Pill? Not so much. I suppose she should get a pat on the head for not being a completely dogmatic authoritarian nutjob. But I haven't seen any reflection on men's rights, mis…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 09:11 PM
4

But but...muh fish and bicycles! Strong independent womyn don't need no man!
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:27 PM
7

This is hilarious for all the wrong reasons. It’s a summer day in Sonoma Valley’s Bohemian Grove, where the country’s most powerful men gather to cavort, perform mysterious rituals and cement their social and political power. Right. Because the average man's experience is very similar to that of the billionaires who meet at the Bohemian club. It's extremely alarming -- and bizarre -- that so many women (and apparently idiotic men) think a homeless man benefits from the fact that there are more m…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:15 PM
125

This was written by a man ("our brains evolved"), albeit a very sad, very pathetic man. It's interesting that healthy male sexuality is being demonized on so many fronts. We are HARD-WIRED to be attracted to females at their peak fertility years. Feminists are shaming men for the way they were born.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:10 PM
5

/u/Imnotmrabut posted the most concise guide. If you're looking for additional materials: All of Karen Straughan's and Janice Fiamengo's Youtube videos. Books: The Fraud of Feminism and The legal subjugation of men by Earnest Belford Bax (early 20th century); The myth of male power by Warren Farrell; The War Against Boys and Who Stole Feminism? by Christina Hoff Sommers; The Second Sexism by David Benetar; The Privileged Sex by Martin Van Creveld*; and the five part series on misandry by Paul Na…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:49 PM
7

Yep. Headline is misleading. The letter essentially praises Ford as an "outspoken" supporter of "women's rights" who is sometimes "provocative". No: she is an outright man-hater; evidently she's also so insecure she can't even handle debate with 15 year old boys. The school may as well have invited a speaker from the Klan. It then goes to on threaten the male students who have rightly condemned her misandry and bullying not to engage in "online harassment" -- precisely what Ford is doing to the …
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:41 PM
11

The disturbing thing about Japan is that the government, even with its extreme aversion to immigration, is making no effort to provide positive incentives to men in order to solve the problem. Instead they're coming up with harebrained ideas like a "handsome man tax". The assumption seems to be that men will "man up" just for the hell of it. But they're forgetting that male sacrifice has always been contingent on some sort of reward, even if it was just respect and honor. There is no honor in sa…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:09 PM
10

Women's lives are seen as as valuable as children's Far more valuable than children's. If we valued children as much as women we'd have a "violence against children act" instead of a "violence against women" act. Women actually suffer less violence than any other demographic, yet here we are.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:54 PM
0

Since you can't support any of your claims with facts On the contrary I have presented facts. I even cited a nobel prize winning economist. You have presented only that's not REAL capitalism deflections. Similar to feminists in fact. communist nutter & denialist The last resort of ideologues: personal attacks. I don't have a dog in this fight as I support neither ideology. I acknowledge the atrocities of both systems. You're the one denying the atrocities of capitalism. Like I said at the outset…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:49 PM
1

Perhaps someday someone will attempt to card that out. Imo the deaths attributable to capitalism are so vast as to be virtually unquantifiable. Really do have to go off to bed now...later.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:42 AM
1

Here's a relevant passage from one of Chomsky's essays: The example stands as a dramatic "criminal indictment" of totalitarian Communism, exactly as Ryan writes. But before closing the book on the indictment we might want to turn to the other half of Sen's India-China comparison, which somehow never seems to surface despite the emphasis Sen placed on it. He observes that India and China had "similarities that were quite striking" when development planning began 50 years ago, including death rate…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:36 AM
0

Sorry, but you don't get to say "this country, which had an observably capitalist economy, wasn't real capitalism." It doesn't wash when communists do it and it doesn't wash when capitalists do it. I do find it amusing however that capitalists seem to think deaths under market economies are akin to "an act of god." Especially when you consider that Sen pointed to eg lack of investment in health care by the Indian government as one of the reasons their death toll was much higher than China. As fo…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:27 AM
1

I think it's debatable both ways. To the extent that people's lives are better (if they are) this is certainly no thanks to capitalism. If the capitalists had won every battle we'd still be working 7 day weeks 12 hours a day with no workplace safety regulations, company towns ruled by private police, rampant child labor and average wages of a dollar a day.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:07 AM
1

Read William Blum's Killing Hope and Rogue State if you're truly interested in the answer. The US government funded and armed fascist, genocidal regimes from Greece to Indonesia to Guatemala. All pro-capitalist.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:28 AM
-1

They had a very free market, private property, wage labor etc. You sound like those communists who say, "But, Russia wasn't a real communist country!" The Nazis were also pro-capitalist, and indeed were funded by the great capitalists of the era, including in the United States.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:26 AM
0

poverty, misery, starvation, totalitarianism and death That's a great description of the history of both communism and capitalism.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:01 AM
0

I'm not a communist. And incidentally, more people died in capitalist India between the years 1950 to 1980 than all communist countries in history. This as documented by the Nobel prize winning economist Amartya Sen. I feel sorry for people who view things in such black and white terms. If you don't hear from me tomorrow I'll get back to you early next week, as I may have to go visit family. I'm interested in the population question as well.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:59 AM
0

Sources are directly from the World Bank as far as I'm aware. Off to bed but I'll see if I can answer your query tomorrow.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:41 AM
-6

I'm afraid it's more complicated than that. The number of people living in extreme poverty has ben reduced (roughly halved, and mostly in China), the number of people living in poverty has increased. This is consistent with the history of capitalism. Charity targets the people most in need, while capitalism manufactures poverty. Do you really think living on $1.50 a day does not constitute poverty? $5? $10? Economists: Fine, use whichever figure you want. That's definitely not what they're doing…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:54 AM
-12

lol you want other sources? I can post these all day: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/08/exposing-great-poverty-reductio-201481211590729809 Sorry guy but you've been duped by a few con artists at the UN and World Bank. They changed the definition of what constitutes poverty in order to arrive at their "decrease in poverty" narrative. "The $1.25 threshold is absurdly low, but it remains in favour because it is the only baseline that shows any progress in the fight against poverty, a…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:21 AM
13

I don't think most MGTOW are "converted" to the cause by older men. All they have to do is look at how their own fathers and uncles have been treated by the system.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:01 AM
-5

Capitalism has lifted most of the world out of crushing poverty over the last 100 years and will do the same for the remainder in the next few decades. This is actually a myth "Asked for his comments, Rob Vos, director of the Development Policy and Analysis Division at the U.N.'s Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA), told IPS: "It is true that most of the poverty reduction comes on account of China - when measured in absolute numbers." In South Asia as a whole, he pointed out, the…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:50 AM
17

lol. Let me guess: the sneaky patriarchy is covering up an epidemic of rape? That must be why they're subjecting boys to kangaroo courts and ruining their lives even when the accusations are obviously false. You would think feminists would be overjoyed with this news, but you'd be wrong. Rape is their bread and butter.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:31 AM
1

If you say so. It is under capitalism than feminism has run completely amok.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:00 AM
1

Not at all. There are plenty of liberal capitalist feminists and always has been. In fact they are probably the strong majority. Feminism isn't inherently socialist. In fact the modern version has essentially replaced class analysis with "patriarchy" analysis, and is therefore contrary to socialism.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:39 AM
1

You're the one who dishonestly claimed that feminism was founded by Marxists. There were socialist feminists, there were socialists who rejected feminism, and there were right wing feminists who thought only propertied men and women should be allowed to vote.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:36 AM
1

I'm aware of them. There were some socialist feminists, and some feminists who (for example) thought blacks were subhuman and that only propertied women and men should be allowed to vote. It is simply wrong to claim that the movement was a Marxist invention.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:34 AM
2

Feminist theories and ideas have exists since at least Lysistrata You're the one who referred to the mid-1800's. Like I said, first wave feminists were mostly rich Christian women, not socialists.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:22 AM
2

Is this a joke? Feminism is inherently Marxist/socialist and has been since the mid-1800s if not before. Incorrect. First wave feminists were mostly rich Christian women. The first (and perhaps best) critique of feminism was written by a socialist (Earnest Belford Bax). The best academic work on misandry was also written by a socialist (Paul Nathanson). There is nothing inherent to socialism that requires men being treated unfairly. Radical feminist theory (patriarchy) was actually introduced to…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 11:46 PM
12

I'm a socialist (anarchist) but there is no reason MRA's "must" be socialist. Most MRA issues require no political affiliation. Things like shared parenting, MGM, alimony reform, due process rights, recognition of male victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, etc. etc. I agree with your premise though: the glass cellar is full of men. Broader issues like homelessness, workplace safety, even social issues like hypergamy (which increases with inequality) cannot be solved by free market cap…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 11:41 PM
14

Nice trolling. I refuse to believe you're being serious.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 11:20 PM
13

We are watching a bizarre and epic social experiment. MRA's are asking society to embrace its higher angels -- reason and empathy. Feminists are asking society to do what feels right -- protect the womynz at all costs, even when this endless faux "protection" is actually harmful to women. Feminists are watching their kingdom collapse just as they achieve power. They could do the right and noble thing -- admit they fucked up big time, embrace the MRM, and subject their theories to critical scruti…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:43 PM
6

Great article. There's another factor in female hostility to male spaces: projection. I had a gay friend who for a time served as an "honorary woman" and was invited into their spaces. He was shocked at how nasty they were toward the men in the lives. They would openly denigrate their boyfriends and husbands, mock a lover's penis size, etc. Now compare this to male spaces. We hardly talk about women at all. References to women are fleeting and often self-deprecating. We talk about sports, politi…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:13 PM
9

You're better off without them, honestly, but I guess that's easy for me to say. My personal opinion is that arguing about things like "sexual harassment" (and its ever expanding definition) may not be the best approach. Better to focus on the ways in which the feminist movement has actively worked against equality. Demonspawn posted a great link.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 06:25 PM
1

It works on some feminists, but apparently not enough to challenge the Gloria Steinem wing. Example: feminists in Vancouver Canada actually tried to no-platform Chris Hedges because he supports the Nordic model. There is a strong "pro-legalization" faction here due to the serial killer Robert Pickton, who targeted poor, often indigenous sex workers on the lower east side. But they were not powerful enough to overcome the "anti-sex" feminists, ie the majority. The latter group worked with the con…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 06:13 PM
1

lol. You're too fatuous to have a debate with. In future try dialing back the unjustified arrogance. It's abundantly clear that you haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about, which is a common trait of feminists. Many people here, including myself, used to be feminists before we did our homework. More advice: when people try to educate you don't get defensive.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 05:51 PM
1

Even if they are socialists their argument still makes no sense. It would be like saying we should criminalize every job on earth because people are "selling their bodies." Why just prostitution? Why not whatever job they're currently working at? Is being a prostitute really worse than working at McDonald's? The only argument that seems to work on these idiots is to point that sex workers themselves overwhelmingly want prostitution legalized. Doing so would make their lives much safer.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 05:46 PM
2

Yep. Women are much more into the rape fantasy stuff than men. Further evidence that everything feminists accuse men of is simply projection.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 05:38 PM
4

It is a one hundred percent certainty that feminists will try to ban sexbots. There's so much money to be made that it seems unlikely they will succeed. On the other hand -- war on drugs. Black markets can be even more lucrative. "But their arguments are complete horseshit," you say. Well that hasn't stopped them before...
/r/MensRights11/05/17 05:36 PM
19

She committed an act of extreme violence against her baby boy. In a sane world she would be charged like the criminal she is. I'm cut and I don't blame my parents, because at the time it was almost universally accepted that the procedure was beneficial. Parents can no longer make that excuse. We have a mountain of scientific data showing that the process is harmful and indeed highly dangerous. Your stupid fucking religious beliefs do not justify mutilating children.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 05:21 PM
6

This. It is abundantly clear that none of these protesters have seen the movie. Otherwise they would realize how embarrassing their actions are. Their slogans "racist sexist anti-queer" make absolutely no sense. There are all sorts of non-straight and non-white people involved in the MRM (not that it would matter if there weren't), and indeed a few appear in the film itself (eg Krystal Garcia). Corrupt gender studies professors are feeding them lies, and they are responding like the dumb kids th…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 05:15 PM
3

If the cultural (i.e. patriarchal) view Culture is created by both men and women. Calling it "patriarchal" is silly. create a straw man It's not a straw man if it's an accurate reflection of feminist theory. I've read about a dozen feminist texts. How many have you read? It is not remotely an overstatement to say that feminists blame men for society's problems. It's right there in the word -- patriarchy. they have simply not been allowed to. I have no idea what you're talking about. Allowed to d…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 01:42 AM
1

suggesting that women should be grateful to men is something else. You're right. All those men who died in wars defending their wives and children and at the workplace under brutal conditions were horrible oppressors. They deserved no gratitude from their wives and children at all. Should blacks be grateful to whites for living in America since they could technically be living in huts in Africa dying from aids and malaria? You're comparing slaves to women? lol. I'm pretty sure slaves didn't eat …
/r/MensRights11/05/17 01:30 AM
1

Thanks for the link. Will save me time in future.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:32 PM
2

I honestly don't understand how anyone could find this "women should be grateful"-argument convincing in its current state. So please elaborate it more. There's nothing wrong with being grateful. It's a good thing. I'm grateful for my loving mother. I'm grateful for the nurses who treated me in hospital when I suffered a broken back. I'm grateful for the women fighting for men's rights. I'm grateful for women who raise children to become decent people. Etc. Etc. So too should women be grateful f…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:20 PM
1

...Because raising children is far less important than being a corporate wage slave. Here's a fun fact that will make feminist's heads explode: housewives are happier than any other female demographic.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 10:40 PM
3

Still waiting for some enterprising Aussie to report this bitch for hate speech.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 10:07 PM
7

I define the patriarchal world view as the cultural/social notion that men are the historical protagonist of mankind. Women have value simply for existing (women and children first), men have to earn value by doing. Additionally, females sexually select for men of high status (which corresponds to achievement). Therefore it's not surprising that men have always achieved more than women -- assuming giving birth and raising children is regarded as a lesser achievement than working outside the home…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 09:53 PM
1

A conspiracy means two ore more people don't something illegal. I'm not aware that ignoring studies is illegal. Highly immoral in this context but not illegal. If you're arguing that every single academic feminist is unaware of the studies in question, I find that implausible.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 09:30 PM
6

Pretty refreshing to see someone admit error rather than create endless fallacies to protect a fallacy. Really all we're saying here is that men are not psycho rapists. A few nuts do not a gender theory make. The stats support our view.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:04 AM
1

Or rather, the SJW feminist madness IS bigoted, Canadians are not.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:47 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:37 AM
1

the idea of free speech was developed in such a way as to allow the public the freedom to criticize their authority figures And this is the great irony. In Canada at least, feminists have institutional power. In the Universities and at the state level. They ramble on about "heteronormative patriarchy" without realizing that they have become the establishment. As establishment figures are wont to do, they seek to ban speech that contradicts their worldview. Feminists are in a particularly precari…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:29 PM
1

Is the respect for transgender people and other visible minorities supported by the majority of the Canadian public? I hope so. I would also hope that free speech rights are supported by the majority of the Canadian public. An alarmingly high number of professors and student unions don't seem to value free speech at all. They would be wise to rethink this knee-jerk support of censorship, since laws opposing free speech will eventually be used against everyone. If we can respect those disagreemen…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:06 PM
1

evolve with the rest of society That's just it though. Is this "society evolving" or is this a tiny percentage of the population -- radical feminists -- enforcing their views on everyone else by fiat? Are they actually increasing respect for the trans community? According to Peterson at least, he has received dozens of supportive emails by trans people, and indeed one even appeared on a news broadcast with him (in support of his views). I don't consider people who use drugs to be criminals. Nor …
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:48 PM
4

Good article on the chilling proposals feminists are making down under. However Ms. Arndt needs to be made aware of something. Men can do just about anything. They can build sky-scrapers, they can land people on the moon, they can cure diseases and invent marvelous new technologies. What they can't do, or at least what they have a very, very difficult time doing, is fighting against women. It doesn't matter if they're actually fighting against women, the mere perception of such a thing triggers …
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:17 PM
1

then you do have the right to be an asshole - just don't expect your government job to last very long. Here's where we disagree. I think the "asshole" is the person demanding that everyone else change their behavior under threat of punishment in order to accord with my fantasies about gender. Until causation is established, there's really only guesses. Which is why I said "my guess." Strangely there doesn't seem to be much interest in the topic by feminists, who essentially control discourse in …
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:05 PM
9

I will do so on condition that you first show me evidence that there is no Bigfoot or Lochness Monster.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:49 PM
21

This is starting to resemble those show trials in the Soviet Union. The heretic has repented. Congratulations feminists on another scalp. I went from having a lot of respect for this guy to having very little. While I sympathize with his plight at being the latest target of the SJW mob, he should know by now that showing weakness to feminists only compounds their hate. An apology to a feminist is like blood to a shark. The first comment on the article says it all: it attacks him for being a "pri…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:48 PM
4

Men should refuse to date feminists. Period. Not out of spite but self-preservation. It should be the first question you ask on a date.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:34 PM
1

"Fox" is not a gender, so it can't really be a gender identity. So it's not the best example. Now you're just being coy. I used the fox example to highlight the absurdity of your argument. Some gender identities are equally ridiculous. These are not oppressed groups. These are teenagers trying to get noticed. "It's zir problem" would become "It's Germaine's problem." Get clever. What you describe is a totalitarian nightmare. Professors should not have to tip toe around engaging in mental gymnast…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:24 PM
10

This campaign proves once and for all (as if we needed any further proof) that feminists have zero interest in equality. Women are ALREADY treated like royalty by the criminal "justice" system.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:54 PM
1

Threatening a professor can result in a hearing that can get you expelled. The threat could be implicit. If his "identity" as a fox was protected then the professor would be required to defer or else. You yourself said that it would be just to punish a professor who refused to address a student in the manner of their choosing. You may think the fox example is absurd, but you should take a look at the dozens of new "gender identities" people are coming up with. but honestly, it just sounds too bi…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:51 PM
7

Reminds me of when royalty would become upset if a peasant looked them in the eye.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:40 PM
1

If the only argument though, to refusing to gender someone correctly, or refusing to use a preferred pronoun, is "because my free speech says I can call you whatever I want", then I have a hard time calling it insensitive to tell them to get a new job. It's more complicated than you are acknowledging. If some student demands to be referred to as a fox because he's otherkin, and that the professor use "zer" otherwise I'll get you fired, that amounts to bullying in the opposite direction. If it vi…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:32 PM
1

I don't see a reason why a professor should want to be so boldly insensitive to their students. Peterson's argument on the subject of "zer" etc is that these terms did not arise organically but are being shoved down the throats of the public by ideologically driven man-hating zealous. It could be argued that it is at least as "insensitive" (indeed, Orwellian) to micro-manage speech under threat of punishment, even if said punishment doesn't come directly from the state. Do you know where I can f…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:07 PM
12

Indeed. If feminists actually believed there was a one in four chance they would suffer a brutal sexual attack while at university they wouldn't go near college campuses. Instead it's their main nesting ground. This shows that they are engaging in a vicious lie to demonize men and terrorize women in service of their warped ideology.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 07:55 PM
1

It is a form not covered by Bill C-16. Well if what you're saying is true I have no problem with the bill, but as I said I haven't read it. I do wonder why Peterson is making such a big deal of it if it's as benign as you say. If a University introduced a policy that forced professors to use one of the new pronouns like zer etc., and they refused, do you think it right that they be punished? In what way are white males attacked? I have never taken a gender studies course, so I don't know what th…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 07:26 PM
3

Pretty sure you are correct, though don't have a study handy. There was a recent case of female prison guards raping boys in a juvenile detention facility. One of the articles about it said, to paraphrase, that we should not be giving boys an impetus to get arrested. THAT is rape culture. I simply can't imagine such an article with the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 07:02 PM
3

Bill C-16 does not force anyone to say anything. So to confirm, if a student asked a prof to use a pronoun, and he/she refused, the prof would not be subject to punishment? Isn't the prof technically engaging in a form of discrimination since he/she isn't recognizing the trans person's condition and instead dismissing them as mentally ill? Incidentally, I find it odd that gender studies professors who repeatedly attack "white males" are never charged under this legislation. Do you know if white …
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:59 PM
2

Jordan Peterson claims otherwise. He has stated that if asked by a student he would refer to a transwoman as "her"/"she." But that the new legislation would force him to do so. I haven't read the legislation personally but there seems to at least be some controversy over how these laws would be enforced, especially when combined with provincial "human rights" legislation.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:42 PM
2

You are correct. It seems to derive from gynocentricism run amok. All societies are gynocentric in the sense that they value the live's of women over those of men. We actually value the live's of women over children, even girls. How do I know this? I know this because women suffer the least violence out of any demographic, yet we have a "violence against women" act rather than a "violence" act or "violence against children" act (which would implicate primarily women). Feminism exploits natural (…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:36 PM
1

Til that only black men have been raped in prison.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:29 PM
8

The state should not be in the business of mandating what pronouns people use. That is totalitarian beyond belief.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:26 PM
17

Here is some local news reportage from Portland. It is absolutely appalling. http://www.kgw.com/news/education/grant-high-teachers-rape-culture-letter-creates-controversy/437663847 The school is investigating the incident. The school provided counselors for staff or students to speak with about the situation. Yes. The students need counselors because logic and rational thought are apparently a source of trauma in today's "education" system. "I felt attacked. I felt frustrated. I felt vulnerable,…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:02 PM
18

"It was completely normal in high school for boys to try to get girls so drunk How did they go about this? Strapping them down and sticking a funnel in their mouths? Or are they claiming that teenage girls have no agency and should therefore be accompanied by an adult male chaperone at all times? I'm really starting to wonder whether "patriarchy" arose because women continually refused to take responsibility for their actions. You can't expect men to treat you as an equal if you insist on having…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 05:37 PM
28

You don't have to go to the Middle East to find rape culture. Just go to a male prison or juvenile detention facility. Or look at the way we treat women who molest boys. There was a case linked here a ways back of a woman living in a trailer park who molested three pre-pubescent boys over a period of several years. She was given probation. Ironically, it would appear that female sexual predation against boys is a major cause of adult male sexual aggression against women. This is a closely guarde…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 05:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter