TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SarcasticAssBag Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by SarcasticAssBag on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
55

Good way to suddenly get hit with false rape allegations and have her whole gaggle of harpies do everything they can to cause as much damage to his life as possible.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/08/21 05:48 PM
6

Ironic because it's not food, they just want you to take it away.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/07/21 12:59 AM
16

as long as she didn't kill him What if he killed himself because he was sick of her bullshit?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/05/21 12:55 AM
16

You are so invited to my next party.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/21 07:27 PM
9

"The experience that you have gone through is in many ways comparable to what happens with domestic violence. Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/03/21 08:51 AM
4

This would happen regardless of gender Possibly. The social media reaction would be quite the opposite, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/20 10:00 AM
5

while I enjoy my healthy and productive relationships from afar With a pair of binoculars.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/19 06:51 AM
3

Honestly, I'd be totally OK with that. The older we are capable of having healthy babies, the more inheritable defects and diseases that kill off people younger than that age we remove from the gene-pool.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/18 08:59 PM
6

You're falling for a false dichotomy here. The choice isn't between some imaginary frothing-at-the-mouth insane leftist elite and equally imaginary patriotic salt-of-the-Earth conservatives. The choice is between people who think justifying their own racism and sexism are acceptable and people who don't. For both groups, you'll find people on the left and the right. The left lends itself better to this particular type of insanity because their language has typically been one of acceptance, toler…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:18 AM
1

Now you're just being willfully obtuse. The original story didn't mention mugging either but I use that as an example too. But fine, if it makes you feel better, you win.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:47 PM
1

Once again, I wasn't making a comment about the posted story but a generic scenario to avoid the more obvious case of victim-blaming with regards to rape.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:14 PM
1

In the US where the original submission took place perhaps but you appear to have missed the point I was making, which was general in nature and had to do with sanctioning vs. risk mitigation. I thought this could be an appropriate place to bring it up since the previous comments were also general in nature and that we had moved beyond the actual story. I felt that drawing the obvious and more interesting parallel to rape prevention was a little crass and probably unnecessary so I avoided it but…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:36 PM
11

I think some people have difficulty differentiating between risk mitigation and responsibility (on both sides of the argument no less). I lessen my risk of being mugged (and I would be a fool not to) by not walking into dark alleys. If I get mugged, the person who deserves sanction is the mugger. One is assigning blame, the other is suggesting that people act responsibly to lessen risk to themselves. You would be a fool to distribute nudes of yourself and not expect them to end up on the interne…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:14 AM
3

A lot of people react very negatively when you point out logical fallacies. In fact, some times they should because not every opinion needs to be rooted in logic. You also don't want to be "that guy" who always adjusts his fedora and pompously proceeds to pick apart someone's argument in a social setting. I've found that you'll get much better results by simply asking "how" instead. Instead of countering someone's arguments. Ask them exactly what they would prefer and then ask them precisely how…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:50 PM
3

As the article hints, it was an unwillingness to offend the jewish population combined with our current right-wing government that ensured the choice. The newspapers have had long and numerous editiorials, charicatures etc. ridiculing ritual circumcision for some time now. As expected, they received their fair share of claims of anti-semitism and so on. The current coalition in power consists of the "Conservative party" and the "Progress party". The Progress party has a long history of sucking u…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:55 AM
2

I remember when France didn't want to participate in the US's latest Iraqi adventure. The news was full of Americans buying tons of French wine and pouring it out. It was glorious.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:43 AM
3

Ok, how about another? The Norwegian supreme court can currently make a ruling on whether a particular application of a law is counter to the constitution or not. One of the other proposed changes also up for consideration is to expand this power to allow the supreme court to decide if a law itself is counter to the constitution. This probably sounds familiar to you but flies in the face of a statement made by Johan Sverdrup, the father of Norwegian parliamentary system, when he in 1884 declared…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 01:01 AM
1

This proposal is from September of 2011 and has been discussed at some length in various media outlets. It's one of 50-some proposed changes to the constitution this year alone, not counting the revising of the language for the entire constitution that was just passed on May 6th. Jesus. Do you people live under a rock? I suppose you haven't heard of the proposed change to allow the supreme court to evaluate the constitutionality of laws (and not just applications of laws) either. This would effe…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:50 PM
3

Ok, since you insist and thereby imply that no such thing exists, the second article of the Norwegian constitution from 1814-1851 stated that jews and monastic societies were prohibited from entering into the kingdom. Timeless, I'm sure we can agree, no? :) Edit: I should, perhaps, amend this and explain that the Norwegian constitution is not considered holy writ here. Unlike in the US, we consider it a law that can be changed just like any other and we regularly do so. We have specific procedur…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:15 PM
3

What irks me is when mods of some of those subreddits also become mods of subreddits with generic names. Before you know it, these subreddits become single-topic places for these people to race their hobby-horses. In /r/randomtopic I expect submissions and comments relating to that topic... not whatever topic du jour radfems or ratheists hate this week. I've had to ditch quite a few subreddits after SRS members and their kind become mods and turn the community toxic. Either I share interests wit…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:15 PM
12

Is it still ok to be a dick, though?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:23 PM
5

Now ask yourself... if you were hiring and her name came across your desk. What would you do?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 01:34 PM
9

I'll be sending you people the bill for retreiving my sides from orbit. Damn you all to hell, this hurts.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 01:30 PM
20

"Dads welcome... except Bob."
/r/MensRights23/12/13 10:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter