TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sarge-Pepper Archive

View 8 posts and 129 comments by Sarge-Pepper on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There's no facts there, just rhetoric meant to slam feminism. This is "Men's Rights", not "Hur Hur, Feminists, amirite?"
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:03 PM
1

Thank you for calling this person out. We should really return this sub to middle ground instead of a reactionary, angry movement.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:57 PM
1

It's better than getting permanently neutered, and relying on someone else to promise they they are on birth control. And it's not through the nuts, it's through the vas diffrens, the tube that runs to your balls, not hte balls themselves.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:11 AM
2

That was a lower court, and it's being appealed.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:35 AM
14

Thank goodness, another beam of sanity in this subreddit. I tried to say the same thing a few days ago. We are trying to encourage men and get us back to an even playing field in areas where we are being looked down on. What we aren't supposed to be doing, is smashing the other 50% of the world. Let's raise ourselves up instead of knocking others down.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:34 AM
0

I won't type their names for privacy reasons, but there are plenty of mainstream women that fight for us. Christina Hoff Sommers, host of the popular "The Factual Feminist" video blog and noted feminist academic who fights the middle ground. Sh0eonHead, another blogger who is out there calling out feminist shenanigans. What about Erin Pizzy, who founded the first male DV shelter, only to be run out and now fronts for AVFM. I personally know several women and have dated two who have shared my bel…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:27 PM
1

You are welcome to think what you wish, but i've been here since my ex wife left me for another guy, leveled DV at me, and tried to take me in court, which I won. The movement has, multiple times, showed that these main points are at the center. Not anti-feminism, not Red-Pill, not misogyny. We focus on us because no one else does or will.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:22 PM
0

And I can only hope that you realize your anger is only going to set you and us up for failure. I'm sorry for what happened, and grateful that you won. But the fact that you received no support at all from here only exemplifies my argument that this sub is only a rage point, not a place of answers or progress. If we are to be legitimate and compeditive as a concept to knock heads with 3rd wave feminism, then we need level headed responses, not simply "Fuck you" logic.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:19 PM
1

Ah, I've butted heads with you before. I remember your presumptive attitude and had you and those like you in mind with this post.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 08:35 PM
0

And that's what we work against. I'm not trying to clam that feminism is clean or proper or right. They're not. 3rd wave has taken over and corrupted a legitimate moment into a sexist husk of what it meant to empower women, encouraging them to instead become victims. My claim on this post was more meant to say that being reactionary and angry doesn't win us fights, calling feminism the enemy and women cunts, as is so prevalent in this sub, only looses us supporters and makes us look childish and…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 06:50 PM
-1

I am upset, especially about the personal reasons I got into MRM in the first place. I support people's rights to be angry. But I've seen that getting angry at everyone doesn't work and makes the movement look like a series of angry man-babies like yourself, who just lash out instead of working toward a purpose. We can be better than that. We are not slaves to our anger, and can use it to further rights for everyone instead of just peddling petty revenge.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 04:48 PM
0

Well, I'm sorry that you condemn 50 percent of the gender. If you actually looked into it, I'm sure you'd find supporters of you weren't angry about it.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:50 PM
-1

Hardly. There are many sympathetic, I'm friends with many. I wouldn't be friends with them and have won them over to our cause if I was angry and said anything that was in the comments of this sub. I'm sorry you are so upset at the other 50% of the population, but this post just shows me that you aren't better than the #killallmen posters on tumblr. You have quite a bit of maturation to do.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:49 PM
1

So I'll go tell you to duck yourself then. My kiddo is on his way to Hawaii with his mother and her husband, and when she left, she leveled DV accusations against me. If anyone deserves to be angry, it's me. But I recognize instead that anger does nothing for the cause I support, instead, I attack the underlying laws and shenanigans that made this type of situation happen. And "our space" sounds mighty SJW of you, my friend. We are MRA's, we should have standards and a good message to win more p…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:20 PM
-2

I'm dating that sometimes, yeah it's feminism as a whole. But my big point is that we are men's rights, not anti-feminism. The men rights moment isn't defined as "not feminism" instead that we are fighting for a solid set of points. We just happen to butt heads with feminism a lot.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:15 PM
1

Damn man, you are the type of poster I'm talking about. No troll here, I've been here since my wife took my son and falsely accused me of domestic violence. I am angry, and I have every right to be. But confronting feminism and those who support the backwards laws that make this kind of thing possible and encouraged takes more than rage. People like you make this movement look horrid.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:13 PM
1

People like me? I've been on there before and it's just male feminists pretty much whilping themselves. No thanks.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 12:51 PM
-1

I'm making a post at the moment and researching local men's rights groups I can be a part of. As far as what I can do on this sub? Not much, I have no mod powers. I can only raise awareness. I can start to be more active in the sub and make comments to counter the hate so normaly said.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 08:42 AM
-1

I disagree with the premise that we should tone police newcomers. I think that's exactly what's needed since we slam feminism constantly for the same thing, not calling out their ranks when they claim that men don't matter. We need to set a solid example from the instant someone steps in that anger, when directed appropriately and at the right issues, is better than random vitriol and spite. Explaining upon entry that these are our core values and we don't want angry foul-mouthed examples of red…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 08:22 AM
1

It did say I was a lurker. I've been here longer than you, pal. Regardless, you prove my point. Nothing but vitriol. I hope you can find the help you need before you hurt the movement further with your misplaced anger.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 08:15 AM
4

Thanks for bringing more concise points than I did. I agree with you, almost all of what you said. I think that I should correct myself a bit and say that making enemies isn't nessecary. There are plenty of feminists who truly believe in Men's rights without the title of MRA themselves. Demonizing the whole movement is rash and unneeded. Instead, lets make concise stabs when the occasion calls for it. If a feminist organization is proven to be backing anti-father legislation, that's feminists fa…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 07:15 AM
5

How is this men's rights at all? This has nothing at all to do with what we stand for: Gender Equality. To level the playing field again, conservative or liberal stances be dammed. This is just a play to Republicans and the Right and I'm not to fond of politicizing the movement I belong to.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 06:15 AM
9

You were banned because you focused on one study as historical evidence of a biased argument. Return of Kings is hardly a credible source, and the study was dubious at best. If you were going for a comment that was oriented toward revealing a truth, you missed the mark with bias language and unproven and unsupportable hypothesis, with a terrible source to back it up. I agree that you shouldn't have been banned for it, but your comment was just bad in a historical sense. They'd tear you apart ove…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 06:00 AM
3

Wow. It even says in the article three or four times that they felt that male sexuality wasn't recognized and the world would be better if it was, but the diss was warranted. Make no mistake, everyone is acting childish, but this article, in no way, embodies anything about the men's right movement or even is worth sharing on this sub. Shit posting of the highest order.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:50 AM
0

You didn't.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:38 AM
1

I agree with your final statement, only because we are watching both groups steadily drift further apart from each other's I only joined the MRM about 3-4 years ago, and I've seen this and most other outlets for MRA related news travel hard to the right, going from "We need to defend our own rights in parental courts and address major issues with how we are treated" to a very hardline conservative "all women are evil and are the cause of everything terrible." While feminism heads the same direct…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:59 PM
2

You sound like a Texan Militaman warning the the government is gonna take our guns and enslave us. I'm sad such a shit post has made it to the front page.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:41 PM
1

Good :> Regardless of the actions and inactions that lead here, this is a good sign that people are starting to trust the numbers more than the narrative. Hopefully, this action will encourage others to take the same actions. It's progress!
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:30 PM
0

What I wrote: "Showing "The Hunting Grounds" really will show that CNN does not value journalist integrity anymore, as it it nothing but a slander piece that is horridly researched and propagates statistics that have been proven false. CNN is better than that, and can be so much more if it actually approached the issues fairly and honestly, instead of trying to push an agenda to promote false rape culture in America. Please, do the right thing and demand that the film makers film a documentary, …
/r/MensRights20/11/15 11:01 AM
-1

I've seen a huge resurgence of true misogyny and right wingers in here lately. I signed up to support men's rights, not to call out each "Slight" that the "left" does to keep men down. It's disgusting how anti-women a lot of these posts are. Everyone has problems, and preventing women from getting birth controls and access to gendered healthcare doesn't help us at all, it only hurts them, and that's not what we should be about.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:57 PM
-2

ITT: The Right wing nuts are loose again. Grab the shock batons and cages.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:55 PM
0

I will agree with that statement. Third-Wave Feminism that has defined itself with victimhood and demonization of men, absolutely it's not compatible. I mean more along the ideologies of Second Wave, where the priority lay with equality between the sexes and empowerment and enforcement of presonal responsibility in women.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:15 PM
1

Did you miss the huge press conference where Obama attacked the very basis of SJW's on campus? It's not going to be in the form of "Hey, SJW's are stupid!" But even politics and progressives are tired of the same old shindig. Anyway, again this isn't supposed to be an us vs them argument. It is possible to support feminism and MRA at the same time, because the problems both genders face are not mutually exclusive. I can want rape to not be a thing for either gender, I can want harsher sentencing…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 11:57 AM
0

Well, this is going nowhere. Enjoy your tinfoil hat.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:16 PM
1

Some, maybe. But that can be traced back to people already disposed to killing attaching to an ideology. We have Muslims that blow themselves up, Christians that blow up abortion clinics, atheists that shoot up schools, and Misogynists that attack women. So yeah, that's to be expected of any movement and you point is moot. Give me a cause, and i'll show you someone who's willing to kill or die for it. The point being that we are trying NOT to come off as crazy and aggressive so that the basic ri…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:09 PM
3

A quote? That's not really supportive of your argument. Again, you're being obtuse and aggressive with this. It's pretty definitive that you really are the "Obama is gunna take my gunz" of the MRA movement. Chill. This is about making everyone equal, not getting into a slobbernocker with anyone. Please, for all of our sakes, stay away from a camera and don't interview with anyone, lest you're views set the progress the MRM has made back decades..
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:57 PM
2

I really didn't think you could sound more crazy, but you did it. Again, it's not us against them. This isn't a knock down drag out fight, it's not gonna come to bloodshed, because as a whole, a majority of people are civil. Progressive, at least to me, means that we are looking forward and trying to anticipate what's coming next. Progressive is not a bad label, neither is conservative. It's SJW's and nutjobs like you that make this a polarized fight, that make it into "It's gotta be us or them"…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:41 PM
1

Annnnd you sound like one of those "the south will rise again types." No use arguing with you.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 05:40 PM
3

I was on board, until they started talking about the Progressive Left. I'm an MRA, and I don't think conservatism and MRA mix super well. It makes us look like bigots and shut-ins. It's not us vs them, it's trying to make sure everyone's issues are being addressed, and splitting it down the middle only pushes people away.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:34 PM
2

#MenDay #InternationalMensDay #ManTalk4ManDay #HeSpeak #Voices4Men
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:31 PM
2

Can anyone else not hear this? I tried to click it and both it and the youtube it links to are both completely silent. EDIT: Because it's only on the left channel and i have the right headphone in.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:38 PM
11

The dude recording sounded like High Five Ghost from Regular Show.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/15 01:22 PM
2

ITT: Red Piller gets upset over moderate views and rational thought.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 12:27 PM
1

Which would explain why you wrote a diatribe saying this exact thing. I'm telling you, your personal anecdotes about you never hearing it, isn't the truth of the situation. It's not even in the urban dictionary, dictionary, or other official sources. For all anyone knows, you just made that shit up now. So please, recognize that your interpretation is not the popular one, nor should it be just because that's the way that you see it.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:47 PM
1

Yeah, you can claim that as much as you want, but the widespread and accepted thought of Cuck is to be cuckholded in a sexual way. Just like as much as people try to redefine racism to be power+prejudice, it's still going to be hating or otherwise segregating based off of skin color or culture.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:23 PM
2

Not until this morning. They called it off topic.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:07 PM
4

To bad it got down-voted to oblivion :/
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:23 AM
5

I posted this over at /r/politics if anyone wants to take a look. Maybe more mainstream attention will help?
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:55 PM
1

A voice for men is hardly a TRP website, even the amount of writers there claim to be MRA. And yes, the public faces of moments generally desire the movement. So the mysoginistic training system of TRP would be described as TRP. Kinda how public forums work.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:34 PM
1

But TRP and MRA have different goals. To bring the two closer makes MRA's look worse. TRP is meant to make guys into Alphas, using various man, and to return women to their place as subordinates. MRA is meant to bring about equality back to places like family law and rape/DV enforcement. Two entirely separate thoughts, and honestly, if MRA has any chance of progressing, it needs to distance itself as far as possibly from TRP
/r/MensRights18/10/15 10:26 PM
1

Yeah. And it was just as cringe. And it doesn't matter if he's MEA or not, anything that is against feminism is "MRA" to feminists because it's been preached to them that must be the only reason people disagree with them is of they are MRA's. Regardless, it's a terrible argument and probably served to solidify their own position.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:09 PM
3

Unfortunatly, you came across as Childish in this. You claim several times to have rebutted against their arguments, when in reality, you only glazed over arguments they presented. Meanwhile, while they were posting sources (Not very good ones, but sources regardless) you didn't post one thing to back up your claims, accusing them of beign emotion driven and accusatory. Im sorry man, but this was 10 ways to go about this wrong and make it seem like you are just a dick stirring the pot, instead o…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 01:58 PM
2

That's not at all what he was saying. You are making a false equivalence. Kissing on the check doesn't equal groping someone's genitals.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:18 AM
0

Wow. That's some straight up red pill there. That type of shit ain't too welcome here.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:51 PM
17

Where's the source for this? It sounds like a fantastic study.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:05 PM
2

This is a really idiotic resentation and video and a pretty well done panel reaction to a prickly subject. ::looks at channel name:: Oh that explains it.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:02 PM
5

Doesn't matter. He's underage, therefore, it's statutory rape. Kids can't consent, period.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:18 PM
3

Because if he's not 18, it's still statutory rape regardless of how he felt about it.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:17 PM
20

I sent this email to the station managers: "Hello, I am appalled and disgusted in the quality of journalism that allowed someone to call the molestation and rape of a young man in your coverage area something as simple as "Providing Sex." The child was underage, this is Statutory Rape, and this woman is a rapist. You should call her as such, instead of trying to downplay the suffering and harm that she did to that young man. If this was gender swapped, with a female student being the once assaul…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:16 PM
2

Totaly agree. This was the most cringeworthy thing i've seen all week.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:32 PM
1

Found the Red Piller.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:25 PM
3

Fucking a, I love this thread.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:38 AM
1

I am so down with this.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:09 PM
5

Right, i'm tossing you under the bus? I'm hesitant to call a someone as volatile as you a brother in this cause, lest you make us look bad, like you kinda are. where the cunt Exactly what i am talking about. You are full of vitriol and spite, and instead of working toward actual change, you'd rather just sit here and insult those who hurt you, acting incredibly like a redfem yourself. You and those like you hurt the movement with your anger.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:48 PM
4

Christ man, turning everyone away at the door for not doing research is a classic feminist move f you cared you would see how much info there is on this subject already Educate yourself. Sound familar? If we want to spread awareness, being a goddamn dick isn't going to get us anywhere. Yes, it's repeated a whole bunch. Yes, there are trolls that come here. But if we put our best foot forward every time, they will have little to no ammo to use, and eventually the trolls will stop, replaced by peo…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:28 PM
10

This. Just all of this. Thank you for saying so much about this. I feel the exact same say about the state of some of the people in here, to the way some close 'rational' feminists end up going batshit when confronted, and even the basic stuff we fight against. Very well written. It should be MRM 101.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:20 PM
2

Here's a split list of evidence why feminism is held in bad regard here and by men in general (Regardless of how few of us actively talk about it out loud.) The first half is all quotes from academic feminists and heralds of the feminist cause. The second half is actions recorded and pointed out that were perpetrated by feminism. It's honestly pretty disgusting when seen all at the same time. But the worst part is that it isn't made up. It's all happened and been said. There's no embellishment i…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:10 PM
2

I would like to make the clarification that this is a TEDx talk. TED talks are fully sponsored and vetted for accuracy and legitimacy of the speaker. TEDx is a form that you fill out to apply for the title. I think this is rediculous and filed a complaint with TED about it, i suggest you do as well.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:38 PM
-1

I provided the proof there, including multiple witness accounts. You get disruptive, you get asked to leave.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:33 AM
-1

I don't know, I love the MRA, but this shit it what makes me want to starts distancing myself. Especially after a blatant attack like that.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:32 AM
-7

Oh I agree, we, as a movement, need to stand up for certain things and make progress. That being said, blatantly breaking the rules of a convention, crowdfunding a stealth manuver into said convention, then disrupting the panels is not a good move. Then claiming oppression on top of it? It's childish and paints us as stereotypes that feminists constantly bash us for, giving merit to their claims. We are supposed to be a rational and reasonable ones, not the ones shutting down panels of conventio…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 08:03 PM
-18

No, the story is that a group of Pro-GG'ers got into a vendor slot under false pretences (As shown on their own crowdfunder or "Honey Badger Radio"), and when they showed up to panels and started to derail the conversations that were already in progress by asking non relevant questions nad generally being disruptive, they were asked to leave. Here's the source, with citations and proof Now everyone's got their panties in a bunch and calling oppression for it. Please, we, as a movement, can do so…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:58 PM
1

Dude, this is the type of argumentative growling that gives us a bad name. Address in a respectable fashion, and our image will improve. If you read more that that comment, she laments that her loved ones and other males will have to be possibly subjected to it, so there's no reason to get up in arms about it.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 07:24 PM
5

Unfortunatly, people are so enamored with having a female president, that ANY female president will do. It's still an election, it's still the person leading the whole country. Let's try to get the lesser of two evils in there.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 07:21 PM
1

Repost this to /r/Gaming. See how it does.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 07:07 PM
-5

Wow. Looking back through your history, you are just a generaly hateful person. I'm really ashamed that men's rights accepts people like you. You give us all a bad name.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:35 PM
-6

Red Herring. I'm not trying to prove anything other than you are being a dick. My evidence? All your responces in this post. Again, someone came in to try and have some discourse, and you are acting exactly like feminists say we do. So please, shape up for all of our sakes.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:26 PM
-5

Yeah, I am. Because you feminists oppose it, duh. You make assumptions of what she believes, even though it flies right in the face of what she just told you. So no. It's not so much as fact as you are being ridiculous. MRM is supposed to be above knee jerk sarcasm and snipes, but here you are, doing the same thing through this whole thread. Answer her questions succinctly, display you opinions in and intelligent manner, and stop acting like a neanderthal toward a guest looking for information.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:01 PM
1

As with any large movement. It's almost like it's make up of lots of people, each with different opinions and ideas...
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:43 PM
0

Because you feminists Seriously, she's trying to talk to us and reach an understanding of our values. Please, try not to be a shithead.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:01 PM
2

I sent this to TED at their contact info. Hopefully, you guys can utilize it. Hello, I'd like to complain about the TEDx talks that you all host. TED talks are and have been a cornerstone of science and technology, allowing the layman to get involved and get explanations on core concepts of important changes in our society. The scientific community has, in my opinion, really benefited from professors, doctors, and researchers taking the time to talk to people and distribute the knowledge of high…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:34 PM
10

Make you own poster and put it up. Place it right in the middle. Have it say: "Men, I love you and accept you. You are not aggressors or rapists by default. Stay strong and believe in yourself." You'll never know who will see it and who will be uplifted by it.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:32 PM
3

Well there's a difference between "don't voluntarily get into a binding contract without seriously considering the political climate and the wants of your business partner" and "don't ever look at a woman, ever."
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:38 PM
5

No, Christ. Stop being so apocalyptic about it. We're supposed to be the rational and level headed group. Vitriol like this gets us nowhere
/r/MensRights11/04/15 06:59 PM
216

It suddenly makes so much sense why SRS is allowed to get away with so much. The CEO is one of them!!
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:29 PM
1

Everyone needs to go and actually read this article. This first paragraph is a good description, but the rest of the article is proving it wrong and proving that obesity is something that needs to be dealt with. It made me very happy to see.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:43 PM
19

HAES At first, when i went to the Wiki page, i was mad. Then i got past the first paragraph and realized the whole article was about how this movement is full of shit and Obesity is an actual problem, citing facts and standards, i got happy again.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:40 PM
3

No, because we are above that. Violence begets violence. Let them that the low road, we will keep showing them real equality.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:08 PM
10

The difference being that men's rights are political, dealing with institutional discrimination. Slut shaming and sexual preference is societal and not really a men's rights issue to be discussed. That's for /r/askmen for a nonbias responses as a whole, or /r/theredpill for the circle jerk of "women r sluts, hue hue" that they are pretty much known for.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 06:52 PM
1

While I agree with the thought behind it, the demands make this come off as conceited and whiney.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:19 PM
8

Wow. This article has so much information. /s
/r/MensRights19/12/14 05:10 PM
17

Sent message to the mods about this asking for an explanation. From me: *What happened? This was removed with over3k up votes, had very informative and relatable posts, and was a true "TIL" that shared a good amout of real info with possible victims. Why was this removed and the user deleted/banned?* Quotes from mods: from lanismycousin[M] via /r/todayilearned/ sent 7 minutes ago Here we go with another mensrights/undeleter The user wasn't banned. She deleted her own account. The information in …
/r/MensRights26/10/14 07:31 PM
4

I agree. While female entitlement is an issue, I feel the only way to really address it is to simply ignore it. Move on a live how you want to, let the haters hate
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:28 PM
2

Not sure if sarcasm or red piller.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:28 PM
16

That's a hefty claim man. You got a source to back it up?
/r/MensRights25/02/14 03:41 PM
5

Your username is apt to this situation. Maybe if /u/echochamber responded too, we'd have a radfem party!
/r/MensRights30/12/13 05:05 PM
6

Dead again.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 04:35 PM
1

Agreed. Very well brought to the table, and I appreciate catching those things when I did not. I wasn't aware of "enthusiastic convent being a thing already, so that was very informative. I do like most of this article, it's a very large step in the right direction, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:57 AM
11

It's not about that. It's about a widely accepted and socially okay practice of gentian mutilation for no purpose than "it looks better" or "my religion says so." Both are barbaric, and when those same reasons are used in another country to mutilate women's genitals, it it suddenly not okay. Male circumcision is one of those serious issues that needs to be addressed.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:30 PM
2

Upvote for Doubleclicks reference.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:25 PM
4

I am so glad you put the /s on there. I was legitimately getting upset. :/
/r/MensRights29/07/13 05:18 PM
3

Reported it for gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:49 PM
6

Down votes because you aren't clear in what you are saying, it's off topic, and that this event is about kids education, not even a men's right issue.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:34 PM
-1

I just had the picture open.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:35 PM
2

Yeah, we noticed. Not much i can do about it.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:58 PM
1

Yeah, actually, another female posted in favor of mine nad random guy's opinion, reinforcing it with some cites. It was awesome.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:57 PM
1

That the whole point i made. Pay isn't (Or rather shouldn't) be based off of gender, in any case, incuding an "Even Pay" inititive giving bonuses to women just for getting into jobs. Pay needs to be based off of mertit, and i believe (No sources, just my opinion) that it is for the most part. Is there sexism? Yes, certainly is. Is it handled, for the most part, yeah. Thats why there are discrimination lawsuits and lawyers.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:21 PM
0

That isn't what he meant. I know what he's saying and agree.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:17 PM
1

As far as i know, no. But if it has, there wouldn't be much coverage of it. It's not sensationalist enough to post that people might be wrong about that stat.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:17 PM
1

Shit. I get that enough in real life. Let alone online. Lol.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:15 PM
3

Don't think i can reupload. Oh well. Anyone could have just gone to the group anyway. It just save them a step.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:12 PM
6

Yeah, but it was on my phone and i was watching my kid at the time :/
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:49 PM
1

No, i just didn't recheck this as i went to bed last night. How do you readd a photo to an imgur album and edit it?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:49 PM
19

Found a feminist pic on facebook. It was early, so i decided to comment. The resulting comments surprised me, as i wasn't torn limb from limb. Did i have my facts straight and present a good argument?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 01:28 AM
1

Up vote for reference to The Importance Of Being Earnest.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:43 PM
0

Good luck to you. It's a sloppy slope of hate you got going on.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:00 PM
1

Why? What case is there for that? Again, you are doing the same thing for the same reasons that feminists are, simply because you don't agree with the fact that other people make their own choices. So what if they want to believe that they can be helped or are worth a damn to something in this world? What does that impact you? Sure, people make excuses and do bad things as under the guise of religion. But what most people seem to forget is that bad people do bad things anyway, regardless of reli…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:12 PM
1

Who are you to say what people should get by on? If a faith in a higher power disqualifies them from respect, how about Islam, wiccanism, paganism, or any faith I any higher power? Why just Christianity? What happens when people falsely believe science facts or pseudo science? Or even hold a sting belief that nothing exists, and hold themselves as the end all, be all? Everyone believes in something, even if its their own tenacity. But even that is intangible and faulty, as it can fail. So why cr…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:03 PM
3

Ouch. That's the exact train of thought that feminism uses. People are people. There are plenty of Christians who don't press their beliefs, just like there are Christians that blow up buildings. Take each person as though they are an individual and realize that we all have problems to deal with, regardless of stance, belief, or race. That's what gets us through to equality. If the person is a dick, that's not indicative of a movement. Same as if the person is awesome. Peeps is peeps and stop Ju…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:51 PM
1

Nope. Though I really need to update it and get it renoterized.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:54 PM
1

Okay. I was certainly planning on having the documents written up by a lawyer to keep it well made. Anything I should watch out for?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:42 PM
1

It could be that the feminists I know are in the minority of the movement now too. I only know a few and am apparently blessed to have even and deep discussions without her launching into the patriarchy or feeling me in a rapist. Is it bad that I want the rest of the movement to be like that?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:18 PM
3

I'm certainly not an apologist, their behavior is ridiculous for any creed or cause. I stated that this is an extreme viewpoint in a movement and should not be heard as the ideals of the movement itself. But your point was that this type of behavior was starting to, or already has become the norm or the movement, and that if it has not, the lack of policing from the inside of the movement is action as condonement of the actions themselves, allowing for progressively worsening situations. And tha…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:14 PM
1

Yeah, and that certainly should be investigated, but the likelihood that if they weren't arrested on the scene to be persecute now is low.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:17 PM
14

That's a well worded argument, and raises several pertinent points. I don't really have a retort.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:15 PM
-5

I don't think that's the message at all. I thinks it's very much extreme disapproval. In no way are they trying sway the general populace's stance on their issue through violence or coercion. Stupidity and hostility, yeah. But locking entrances does not make terrorism.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:48 PM
12

It's not terrorism. False fire alarm, yeah. Illegal barricade of a public space? Sure. Possibly protesting without a permit? Not too sure. But terrorism? Doubtful. This is Canada, not America, where everyone's a terrorist in disguise.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:11 PM
27

They did. Toronto police had to clear them out, but the speech still happened, granted, it was an hour late.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:30 PM
50

Several, actually. The feminists that sit down and talk, who genuinely want social change for the female gender, but realize that doing it at the expense of others is not a good idea, and perpetrates thought processes of bigotry and hatred that should have died a long time ago. These feminists view men as the enemy and view anything that tries to put our gender into the limelight is met with hostility for that very reason. They view us as the oppressors, directly making their life bad, instead o…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter