TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sarutahiko Archive

View 0 posts and 8 comments by Sarutahiko on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And the National Organization for Marriage calls itself an organization that protects marriage and communities that are built around it. It doesn't make it true. There are many people and organizations that self-identify as a certain group in order to further their own goals. Sometimes they successful. Either way, what they end up doing is hurting and defaming the original group/name. All I 'wanted' was to say that just because certain members of a certain group act a certain way does not mean t…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 08:49 PM
1

I would agree with that assessment as well.. But I feel like calling organizations that practice that kind of .. uh.. work?.. feminist organizations is like calling groups like the Family Research Council, Focus on the Family and the National Organization for Marriage pro-family and pro-rights groups. -.-
/r/MensRights14/04/11 08:13 PM
-1

I'll be honest: I'm not going to read that. I also don't have a deep knowledge of the current back-and-forth between prominent feminists and ... whatever the opposite of a feminist is. This is what I know: a feminist is anyone who believes that women and men should have equal rights. That's a lot of people, actually. And I would be willing to bet any amount of money that that group of people, taken as a whole, will display this kind of ridiculous behavior no more and no less than any other large…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 07:53 PM
2

I can see that you are attacking me. If I didn't see it I wouldn't be calling you out on it. Hm? I never claimed to be a genius, but your implication and immediate teardown of such is.. an unoriginal method of attack. Good job. Your smooth transition from argument to person attack (and then claiming that the personal attack is a-okay because you know you're doing it) was very well done, indeed. Sneaky. I love you too.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 07:31 PM
2

I enjoy how you attack me instead of my arguments. Really moves the whole exchange of ideas forward. I would also like to question your attacking my apparent.. uh.. intellect (or what I would assume you would call intellectual facade)? Is it so wrong of me to use the words and phrases that best convey my thoughts? One more thing: your hypocrisy tickles me.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 07:21 PM
0

Yes, I do see the title and I do see the word "example." And what that implies is that this is typical of anyone espousing a feminist argument. And it's not. Also, please read up on the logical fallacy of small numbers. I do not think that any "side" is not guilty of claiming false "facts," and I agree that doing such is deplorable and wrong. This does not give just cause to attack an entire base of people because one person that holds that viewpoint acted stupid. Furthermore, whether or not any…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 06:53 PM
-3

Support for my statement: taking one argument and applying the negative implications of this argument style to all people who support similar ideas.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 06:43 PM
-11

Example of stereotyping
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter